36 datasets found
  1. Great Recession: GDP growth for the E7 emerging economies 2007-2011

    • statista.com
    Updated Sep 2, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Great Recession: GDP growth for the E7 emerging economies 2007-2011 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1346915/great-recession-e7-emerging-economies-gdp-growth/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 2, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2007 - 2011
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    The Global Financial Crisis (2007-2008), which began due to the collapse of the U.S. housing market, had a negative effect in many regions across the globe. The global recession which followed the crisis in 2008 and 2009 showed how interdependent and synchronized many of the world's economies had become, with the largest advanced economies showing very similar patterns of negative GDP growth during the crisis. Among the largest emerging economies (commonly referred to as the 'E7'), however, a different pattern emerged, with some countries avoiding a recession altogether. Some commentators have particularly pointed to 2008-2009 as the moment in which China emerged on the world stage as an economic superpower and a key driver of global economic growth. The Great Recession in the developing world While some countries, such as Russia, Mexico, and Turkey, experienced severe recessions due to their connections to the United States and Europe, others such as China, India, and Indonesia managed to record significant economic growth during the period. This can be partly explained by the decoupling from western financial systems which these countries undertook following the Asian financial crises of 1997, making many Asian nations more wary of opening their countries to 'hot money' from other countries. Other likely explanations of this trend are that these countries have large domestic economies which are not entirely reliant on the advanced economies, that their export sectors produce goods which are inelastic (meaning they are still bought during recessions), and that the Chinese economic stimulus worth almost 600 billion U.S. dollars in 2008/2009 increased growth in the region.

  2. National debt of China in relation to GDP 2010-2030

    • ai-chatbox.pro
    • statista.com
    Updated Jun 3, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista Research Department (2025). National debt of China in relation to GDP 2010-2030 [Dataset]. https://www.ai-chatbox.pro/?_=%2Fstudy%2F9896%2Fchina-statista-dossier%2F%23XgboD02vawLYpGJjSPEePEUG%2FVFd%2Bik%3D
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 3, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Authors
    Statista Research Department
    Area covered
    China
    Description

    The graph shows national debt in China related to gross domestic product until 2024, with forecasts to 2030. In 2024, gross national debt ranged at around 88 percent of the national gross domestic product. The debt-to-GDP ratio In economics, the ratio between a country's government debt and its gross domestic product (GDP) is generally defined as the debt-to-GDP ratio. It is a useful indicator for investors to measure a country's ability to fulfill future payments on its debts. A low debt-to-GDP ratio also suggests that an economy produces and sells a sufficient amount of goods and services to pay back those debts. Among the important industrial and emerging countries, Japan displayed one of the highest debt-to-GDP ratios. In 2024, the estimated national debt of Japan amounted to about 250 percent of its GDP, up from around 180 percent in 2004. One reason behind Japan's high debt load lies in its low annual GDP growth rate. Development in China China's national debt related to GDP grew slowly but steadily from around 23 percent in 2000 to 34 percent in 2012, only disrupted by the global financial crisis in 2008. In recent years, China increased credit financing to spur economic growth, resulting in higher levels of debt. China's real estate crisis and a difficult global economic environment require further stimulating measures by the government and will predictably lead to even higher debt growth in the years ahead.

  3. Great Recession: global gross domestic product (GDP) growth from 2007 to...

    • statista.com
    Updated Sep 2, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Great Recession: global gross domestic product (GDP) growth from 2007 to 2011 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1347029/great-recession-global-gdp-growth/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 2, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2007 - 2011
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    From the Summer of 2007 until the end of 2009 (at least), the world was gripped by a series of economic crises commonly known as the Global Financial Crisis (2007-2008) and the Great Recession (2008-2009). The financial crisis was triggered by the collapse of the U.S. housing market, which caused panic on Wall Street, the center of global finance in New York. Due to the outsized nature of the U.S. economy compared to other countries and particularly the centrality of U.S. finance for the world economy, the crisis spread quickly to other countries, affecting most regions across the globe. By 2009, global GDP growth was in negative territory, with international credit markets frozen, international trade contracting, and tens of millions of workers being made unemployed.

    Global similarities, global differences

    Since the 1980s, the world economy had entered a period of integration and globalization. This process particularly accelerated after the collapse of the Soviet Union ended the Cold War (1947-1991). This was the period of the 'Washington Consensus', whereby the U.S. and international institutions such as the World Bank and IMF promoted policies of economic liberalization across the globe. This increasing interdependence and openness to the global economy meant that when the crisis hit in 2007, many countries experienced the same issues. This is particularly evident in the synchronization of the recessions in the most advanced economies of the G7. Nevertheless, the aggregate global GDP number masks the important regional differences which occurred during the recession. While the more advanced economies of North America, Western Europe, and Japan were all hit hard, along with countries who are reliant on them for trade or finance, large emerging economies such as India and China bucked this trend. In particular, China's huge fiscal stimulus in 2008-2009 likely did much to prevent the global economy from sliding further into a depression. In 2009, while the United States' GDP sank to -2.6 percent, China's GDP, as reported by national authorities, was almost 10 percent.

  4. H

    Replication Data for: The Crisis of COVID-19 and the Political Economy of...

    • dataverse.harvard.edu
    Updated Jul 7, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Ian Tsung-yen Chen (2023). Replication Data for: The Crisis of COVID-19 and the Political Economy of China’s Vaccine Diplomacy [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/EZHYNC
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Jul 7, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Harvard Dataverse
    Authors
    Ian Tsung-yen Chen
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    China
    Description

    This dataset includes the replication dataset and code (do file for stata) for a forthcoming article in Foreign Policy Analysis, titled "The Crisis of COVID-19 and the Political Economy of China’s Vaccine Diplomacy"

  5. Total investment as a share of GDP in China 1980-2030

    • statista.com
    Updated Apr 24, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Total investment as a share of GDP in China 1980-2030 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1197064/china-total-investment-as-gdp-share/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 24, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    China
    Description

    In 2024, China’s level of total investment reached around 40.4 percent of the gross domestic product (GDP). This value is expected to remain stable in 2025 and increase slightly in the following years. Final consumption accounted for 55.7 percent in 2023. International comparison of total investments The GDP of a country can be calculated by the expenditure approach, which sums up final consumption (private and public), total investment, and net exports. The ratio of consumption to investment may vary greatly between different countries.Matured economies normally consume a larger share of their economic output. In the U.S. and many European countries, total investment ranges roughly at only 20 to 25 percent of the GDP. In comparison, some emerging economies reached levels of 30 to 40 percent of investment during times of rapid economic development. Level of total investment in China China is among the countries that spend the highest share of their GDP on investments. Between 1980 and 2000, 30 to 40 percent of its economic output were invested, roughly on par with South Korea or Japan. While the latter’s investment spending ratio decreased in later years, China’s even grew, especially after the global financial crisis, peaking at staggering 47 percent of GDP in 2011.However, returns on those investments declined year by year, indicated by lower GDP growth rates. This resulted in a quickly growing debt burden, which reached nearly 285 percent of the GDP in 2023, up from only 135 percent in 2008. The Chinese government defined the goal to shift to consumption driven growth, but the transformation takes longer than expected.

  6. f

    Additional file 1 of An innovative machine learning workflow to research...

    • springernature.figshare.com
    xlsx
    Updated Aug 15, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Da Wang; YingXue Zhou (2024). Additional file 1 of An innovative machine learning workflow to research China’s systemic financial crisis with SHAP value and Shapley regression [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.26691553.v1
    Explore at:
    xlsxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 15, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    figshare
    Authors
    Da Wang; YingXue Zhou
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    China
    Description

    Additional file 1: Spearman correlation matrix.

  7. f

    CWT plots comparison of the COVID-19 and the GFC.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 12, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Cheng Hu; Wei Pan; Wulin Pan; Wan-qiang Dai; Ge Huang (2023). CWT plots comparison of the COVID-19 and the GFC. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272024.t002
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 12, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Cheng Hu; Wei Pan; Wulin Pan; Wan-qiang Dai; Ge Huang
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    CWT plots comparison of the COVID-19 and the GFC.

  8. f

    Stock price crash risk.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jul 9, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Xin Wang; Yue Sun; Yanlin Li; Cuijiao Zhang (2024). Stock price crash risk. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306899.t008
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jul 9, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Xin Wang; Yue Sun; Yanlin Li; Cuijiao Zhang
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This paper focuses on firms in which insiders pledge their shares as collateral for loans. By investigating a natural experiment—China’s enactment of provisions on share reductions that restrict pledge creditors’ cashing-out behavior—we find that pledging firms exhibited more conservative financial reporting after the implementation than non-pledging firms. This effect was pronounced in firms with a higher ratio of pledged shares, a longer maturation period of the pledged shares, and more concentrated pledge creditors. Additionally, we show that pledging firms increased their accounting conservatism after the shock, leading to a lower risk of margin calls and stock price crashes. The effect on accounting conservatism was stronger in firms with controlling pledgers or when the pledge creditors were banks. Our results remained consistent after we performed several robustness tests. These behaviors are economically logical because the provisions heighten creditors’ liquidity risk and the potential losses of loan default. Pledging shareholders embrace more accounting conservatism to mitigate creditors’ concerns about agency costs and avoid triggering margin calls. Our findings provide direct support that creditors have a real demand for accounting conservatism and highlight the impact of shareholder-creditor conflicts on the financial reporting policies of pledging firms.

  9. f

    Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Apr 3, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Lujing Liu; Xiaoning Zhou; Jian Xu (2024). Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300217.t004
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 3, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Lujing Liu; Xiaoning Zhou; Jian Xu
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    The objective of this study is to explore the impact of working capital management on firms’ financial performance in China’s agri-food sector from 2006 to 2021. In addition, we analyze whether this impact is the same during the 2008 financial crisis and the 2020 COVID-19 crisis. Working capital management is measured by working capital investment policy (measured by current assets to total assets ratio), working capital financing policy (measured by current liabilities to total assets ratio), cash conversion cycle, and net working capital ratio. The results reveal that current assets to total assets ratio and net working capital ratio positively influence financial performance measured through return on assets (ROA), while current liabilities to total assets ratio and cash conversion cycle negatively influence ROA. We also find that the relationship between working capital management and financial performance is more affected during COVID-19 than in the 2008 financial crisis. The findings might provide important implications for company managers to make optimal working capital management practices, depending on the economic environment.

  10. Approximated hazard rate.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Sep 6, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Kwangwon Ahn; Minhyuk Jeong; Jinu Kim; Domenico Tarzia; Ping Zhang (2024). Approximated hazard rate. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309483.t005
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 6, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Kwangwon Ahn; Minhyuk Jeong; Jinu Kim; Domenico Tarzia; Ping Zhang
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Housing markets are often characterized by price bubbles, and governments have instituted policies to stabilize them. Under this circumstance, this study addresses the following questions. (1) Does policy tightening change expectations in housing prices, revealing a regime change? (2) If so, what determines the housing market’s reaction to policy tightening? To answer these questions, we examine the effects of policy tightening that occurred in 2016 on the Chinese housing market where a price boom persisted in the post-2000 period. Using a log-periodic power law model and employing a modified multi-population genetic algorithm for parameter estimation, we find that tightening policy in China did not cause a market crash; instead, shifting the Chinese housing market from faster-than-exponential growth to a soft landing. We attribute this regime shift to low sensitivity in the Chinese housing market to global perturbations. Our findings suggest that government policies can help stabilize housing prices and improve market conditions when implemented expediently. Moreover, policymakers should consider preparedness for the possibility of an economic crisis and other social needs (e.g., housing affordability) for overall social welfare when managing housing price bubbles.

  11. R

    Rigid Crash Barrier Report

    • archivemarketresearch.com
    doc, pdf, ppt
    Updated Apr 3, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Archive Market Research (2025). Rigid Crash Barrier Report [Dataset]. https://www.archivemarketresearch.com/reports/rigid-crash-barrier-117081
    Explore at:
    doc, ppt, pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 3, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Archive Market Research
    License

    https://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policy

    Time period covered
    2025 - 2033
    Area covered
    Global
    Variables measured
    Market Size
    Description

    The global rigid crash barrier market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing infrastructure development, stringent road safety regulations, and rising government investments in transportation infrastructure improvements worldwide. The market size in 2025 is estimated at $8 billion, exhibiting a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 7% from 2025 to 2033. This growth is fueled by several key factors. Firstly, the expansion of highway networks and the construction of new roads, particularly in developing economies, creates significant demand for crash barriers. Secondly, the increasing awareness of road safety and the implementation of stricter regulations mandating the installation of these barriers are boosting market expansion. Furthermore, technological advancements leading to the development of more durable, cost-effective, and aesthetically pleasing barrier systems are driving adoption. Different material types, such as metal and concrete, cater to various application needs and budget considerations, contributing to the market's diversity. The market segmentation reveals strong growth across various applications, with highways and mountain roads representing significant segments. While metal crash barriers currently dominate the market due to their versatility and cost-effectiveness, concrete barriers are gaining traction owing to their superior strength and durability in high-impact scenarios. Geographic analysis indicates strong growth potential in Asia-Pacific, particularly in rapidly developing economies like India and China, driven by large-scale infrastructure projects. North America and Europe maintain substantial market shares due to established infrastructure and stringent safety standards. However, competitive pressures from numerous established and emerging players are shaping the market landscape. Companies like YNM Safety, G R Infraprojects, and others are actively involved in innovation and strategic partnerships to enhance their market presence and meet the growing demand for high-performance rigid crash barriers. The forecast period of 2025-2033 anticipates continued expansion, with market growth further influenced by evolving safety regulations, advancements in barrier design, and overall economic growth in key regions.

  12. Consumer confidence in China 2020-2025

    • statista.com
    Updated Jul 9, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Consumer confidence in China 2020-2025 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/271697/consumer-confidence-in-china/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 9, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    May 2020 - May 2025
    Area covered
    China
    Description

    In May 2025, the index for consumer confidence in China ranged at ** points, up from **** points in the previous month. The index dropped considerably in the first half of 2022 and performed a sideways movement during 2023 and 2024. Consumer confidence Index The consumer confidence index (CCI), also called Index of Consumer Sentiment (ICS) is a commonly used indicator to measure the degree of economic optimism among consumers. Based on information about saving and spending activities of consumers, changes in business climate and future spending behavior are being projected. The CCI plays an important role for investors, retailers, and manufacturers in their decision-making processes. However, measurement of consumer confidence varies strongly from country to country. As consumers need time to react to economic changes, the CCI tends to lag behind other indicators like the consumer price index (CPI) and the producer price index (PPI). Development in China As shown by the graph at hand, confidence among Chinese consumers picked up since mid of 2016. In October 2017, the CCI hit a record value of 127.6 index points and entered into a sideward movement. Owing to a relative stability in GDP growth, a low unemployment rate, and a steady development of disposable household income, Chinese consumers gained more confidence in the state of the national economy. Those factors also contribute to the consumers’ spending power, which was reflected by a larger share of consumption in China’s GDP. After the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic, consumer confidence dropped quickly in the beginning of 2020, but started to recover in the second half of the year, leading to a v-shaped movement of the index in 2020.

  13. Difference test of matching variables.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jul 9, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Xin Wang; Yue Sun; Yanlin Li; Cuijiao Zhang (2024). Difference test of matching variables. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306899.t002
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jul 9, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Xin Wang; Yue Sun; Yanlin Li; Cuijiao Zhang
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This paper focuses on firms in which insiders pledge their shares as collateral for loans. By investigating a natural experiment—China’s enactment of provisions on share reductions that restrict pledge creditors’ cashing-out behavior—we find that pledging firms exhibited more conservative financial reporting after the implementation than non-pledging firms. This effect was pronounced in firms with a higher ratio of pledged shares, a longer maturation period of the pledged shares, and more concentrated pledge creditors. Additionally, we show that pledging firms increased their accounting conservatism after the shock, leading to a lower risk of margin calls and stock price crashes. The effect on accounting conservatism was stronger in firms with controlling pledgers or when the pledge creditors were banks. Our results remained consistent after we performed several robustness tests. These behaviors are economically logical because the provisions heighten creditors’ liquidity risk and the potential losses of loan default. Pledging shareholders embrace more accounting conservatism to mitigate creditors’ concerns about agency costs and avoid triggering margin calls. Our findings provide direct support that creditors have a real demand for accounting conservatism and highlight the impact of shareholder-creditor conflicts on the financial reporting policies of pledging firms.

  14. Great Recession: major economy government expenditure as a share of GDP...

    • statista.com
    Updated Sep 2, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Great Recession: major economy government expenditure as a share of GDP 2007-2011 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1349349/great-recession-government-expenditure-gdp-major-economies/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 2, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2007 - 2012
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    During the financial crisis of 2007-2008 and the subsequent recession, many of the world's largest countries increased their government expenditure in order to backstop financial markets, provide a stimulus to the non-financial economy, or to bail-out companies and institutions which were in danger of bankruptcy. China and the United States led the way in stimulus spending, as the Chinese announced a package worth 600 billion U.S. dollars in 2008, while the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) in the U.S. had a combined announced value of around 1.5 trillion U.S. dollars. The increase in China's government expenditure was particularly notable, as it represented an increase of almost one-third from 2007 to 2009.

  15. Gross domestic product (GDP) growth rate in the BRICS countries 2000-2030

    • statista.com
    Updated May 20, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Gross domestic product (GDP) growth rate in the BRICS countries 2000-2030 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/741729/gross-domestic-product-gdp-growth-rate-in-the-bric-countries/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 20, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    India, South Africa, Russia, Brazil, China
    Description

    For most of the past two decades, China had the highest GDP growth of any of the BRICS countries, although it was overtaken by India in the mid-2010s, and India is predicted to have the highest growth in the 2020s. All five countries saw their GDP growth fall during the global financial crisis in 2008, and again during the coronavirus pandemic in 2020; China was the only economy that continued to grow during both crises, although India's economy also grew during the Great Recession. In 2014, Brazil experienced its own recession due to a combination of economic and political instability, while Russia also went into recession due to the drop in oil prices and the economic sanctions imposed following its annexation of Crimea.

  16. Gross domestic product (GDP) of the United States 2030

    • statista.com
    • ai-chatbox.pro
    Updated May 21, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Gross domestic product (GDP) of the United States 2030 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/263591/gross-domestic-product-gdp-of-the-united-states/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 21, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    The statistic shows the gross domestic product (GDP) of the United States from 1987 to 2024, with projections up until 2030. The gross domestic product of the United States in 2024 amounted to around 29.18 trillion U.S. dollars. The United States and the economy The United States’ economy is by far the largest in the world; a status which can be determined by several key factors, one being gross domestic product: A look at the GDP of the main industrialized and emerging countries shows a significant difference between US GDP and the GDP of China, the runner-up in the ranking, as well as the followers Japan, Germany and France. Interestingly, it is assumed that China will have surpassed the States in terms of GDP by 2030, but for now, the United States is among the leading countries in almost all other relevant rankings and statistics, trade and employment for example. See the U.S. GDP growth rate here. Just like in other countries, the American economy suffered a severe setback when the economic crisis occurred in 2008. The American economy entered a recession caused by the collapsing real estate market and increasing unemployment. Despite this, the standard of living is considered quite high; life expectancy in the United States has been continually increasing slightly over the past decade, the unemployment rate in the United States has been steadily recovering and decreasing since the crisis, and the Big Mac Index, which represents the global prices for a Big Mac, a popular indicator for the purchasing power of an economy, shows that the United States’ purchasing power in particular is only slightly lower than that of the euro area.

  17. GDP loss due to COVID-19, by economy 2020

    • statista.com
    • ai-chatbox.pro
    Updated May 30, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Jose Sanchez (2025). GDP loss due to COVID-19, by economy 2020 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/topics/6139/covid-19-impact-on-the-global-economy/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 30, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Authors
    Jose Sanchez
    Description

    In 2020, global gross domestic product declined by 6.7 percent as a result of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic outbreak. In Latin America, overall GDP loss amounted to 8.5 percent.

  18. GDP growth rate of the world's seven largest economies 2021, by country

    • statista.com
    • ai-chatbox.pro
    Updated Jun 23, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). GDP growth rate of the world's seven largest economies 2021, by country [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1207780/gdp-growth-rate-of-the-world-s-seven-largest-economies-by-country/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 23, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    World
    Description

    Out of the world's seven largest economies, the United Kingdom was the most negatively affected by the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. During the third quarter of 2020, the GDP growth rate of the UK stood at minus *** percent compared to the previous year. Furthermore, the GDPs of India and Japan were contracted by minus *** percent. Only China experienced a positive GDP growth rate of *** percent during that same period. However, in 2021, all the largest economies worldwide started to recover, with growth rates varying from *** percent (Japan) to over **** percent (India).

  19. f

    Exclusion of sample firms in which either executives or shareholders sell...

    • plos.figshare.com
    • figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jul 9, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Xin Wang; Yue Sun; Yanlin Li; Cuijiao Zhang (2024). Exclusion of sample firms in which either executives or shareholders sell shares. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306899.t012
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jul 9, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Xin Wang; Yue Sun; Yanlin Li; Cuijiao Zhang
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Exclusion of sample firms in which either executives or shareholders sell shares.

  20. Gross domestic product (GDP) in Germany 2030

    • statista.com
    • ai-chatbox.pro
    Updated May 21, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Gross domestic product (GDP) in Germany 2030 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/375206/gross-domestic-product-gdp-in-germany/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 21, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    Germany
    Description

    In 2018, Germany’s GDP peaked at around four billion U.S. dollars, the highest GDP the country has reported in decades. It is predicted to grow towards 5.57 billion by 2030. Germany has the fourth-largest GDP in the world, after the United States, China, and Japan. The national debt of Germany has steadily been falling since 2012 and is now about a quarter of the size of Japan’s and half that of the United States. Development of GDP per capita Gross domestic product per capita in Germany has been increasing since 2015 and experienced its last period of decline between the mid-nineties and early noughties. In 2001, GDP per capita was the lowest it had been since the early nineties, but more than doubled by the time of the financial crisis in 2008. GDP per capita fluctuated throughout the subsequent decade, before reaching around 48,000 U.S. dollars in 2018. Largest economic sectors The service sector generates the highest share of GDP in Germany at nearly 70 percent. Finance and telecommunications are a large part of the service sector, as well as tourism – including hospitality and accommodation. Roughly a quarter of GDP currently comes from the production industry, not including construction. Agriculture, fishing, and forestry make up less than one percent.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Statista (2024). Great Recession: GDP growth for the E7 emerging economies 2007-2011 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1346915/great-recession-e7-emerging-economies-gdp-growth/
Organization logo

Great Recession: GDP growth for the E7 emerging economies 2007-2011

Explore at:
Dataset updated
Sep 2, 2024
Dataset authored and provided by
Statistahttp://statista.com/
Time period covered
2007 - 2011
Area covered
Worldwide
Description

The Global Financial Crisis (2007-2008), which began due to the collapse of the U.S. housing market, had a negative effect in many regions across the globe. The global recession which followed the crisis in 2008 and 2009 showed how interdependent and synchronized many of the world's economies had become, with the largest advanced economies showing very similar patterns of negative GDP growth during the crisis. Among the largest emerging economies (commonly referred to as the 'E7'), however, a different pattern emerged, with some countries avoiding a recession altogether. Some commentators have particularly pointed to 2008-2009 as the moment in which China emerged on the world stage as an economic superpower and a key driver of global economic growth. The Great Recession in the developing world While some countries, such as Russia, Mexico, and Turkey, experienced severe recessions due to their connections to the United States and Europe, others such as China, India, and Indonesia managed to record significant economic growth during the period. This can be partly explained by the decoupling from western financial systems which these countries undertook following the Asian financial crises of 1997, making many Asian nations more wary of opening their countries to 'hot money' from other countries. Other likely explanations of this trend are that these countries have large domestic economies which are not entirely reliant on the advanced economies, that their export sectors produce goods which are inelastic (meaning they are still bought during recessions), and that the Chinese economic stimulus worth almost 600 billion U.S. dollars in 2008/2009 increased growth in the region.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu