Facebook
TwitterAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The data and programs replicate tables and figures from "The US–China Phase One trade deal: An economic analysis of the managed trade agreement", by Funke and Wende. Please see the ReadMe file for additional details.
Facebook
TwitterThis data package includes the underlying data and files to replicate the calculations, charts, and tables presented in An Assessment of the Korea-China Free Trade Agreement, PIIE Policy Brief 15-24. If you use the data, please cite as: Schott, Jeffrey J., Euijin Jung, and Cathleen Cimino-Isaacs. (2015). An Assessment of the Korea-China Free Trade Agreement. PIIE Policy Brief 15-24. Peterson Institute for International Economics.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
China and Australia signed the Free Trade Agreement (ChAFTA) in 2015, which aims to eliminate or reduce trade barriers between countries through tariffs or quotas. Eliminating trade barriers has expanded China’s agricultural imports from Australia. ChAFTA will strengthen the trade relationship between the two countries, enabling agricultural product imports to have a trade creation effect. This article systematically evaluates the trade effects of ChAFTA on the scale of China’s agricultural product imports based on data from 2000 to 2020. Two statistical methods, Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) and Poisson Pseudo Maximum Likelihood (PPML) are applied to estimate the trade effects of agreements. Empirical studies have shown that ChAFTA has a significant trade creation effect on China’s agricultural product imports, while the trade diversion effect is insignificant. When time fixed effects and export country fixed effects are controlled, the PPML method exhibits stronger explanatory power compared to OLS and the estimated trade creation effect is more significant. The empirical research results remain robust even after considering the impact of WTO. There are no endogeneity issues in the results after adding lead variables. By incorporating lagged terms, we find there is no phase-in effect. Empirical research on heterogeneity analysis of agricultural product classification found that ChAFTA had the most significant impact on the import of forest products and aquatic products, followed by textiles and agricultural products.
Facebook
TwitterIn the backdrop of criticism that the China-Pakistan Free Trade Agreement has disproportionately favored China, particularly in agricultural trade, there has been a surge in Pakistan’s imports, leading to a trade deficit. This study attempts to evaluate the impact of CPFTA 1&2 on the vegetable exports of Pakistan which is an important sector of the agricultural industry. A panel data set of Pakistan’s vegetable exports to its trading partners from 2003 to 2021 was analyzed with the extensively used gravity model of trade. The vegetable export data was sourced from the International Trade Centre (ITC) which is based on the Pakistan Bureau of Statistics. The results suggest that the China-Pakistan Free Trade Agreement (CPFTA-I) has a positive association with Pakistan’s vegetable exports to China. However, trade liberalization with Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, and Malaysia plays a more substantial role in driving Pakistan’s vegetable exports. CPFTA-II has not had a measurable or statistically significant impact on the vegetable exports of Pakistan as this period was highly influenced by COVID-19. The results of colonialism variables show that Pakistan is exporting more to countries with the same colonial history. Moreover, the results of the geographical variable suggest that Pakistan should explore more close markets to expand vegetable exports. Policy implications suggest the need to reduce trade costs, leverage CPEC infrastructure, enrich trade relations with neighboring countries, and involve business professionals in policy negotiations.
Facebook
TwitterMIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
License information was derived automatically
Techsalerator’s Import/Export Trade Data for United States's $26.9 trillion economy provides a detailed and insightful collection of information on international trade activities involving companies in United States.
To obtain Techsalerator’s Import/Export Trade Data for the United States, please reach out to info@techsalerator.com with your requirements. Techsalerator will provide a customized quote based on your data needs, with delivery available within 24 hours. Ongoing access options can also be discussed.
Techsalerator's Import/Export Trade Data for the United States offers a rich and detailed collection of information crucial for businesses, investors, and trade analysts. This dataset provides a thorough examination of trade activities, documenting and classifying import and export transactions across various U.S. industries. By integrating data from customs reports, trade agreements, and shipping records, the dataset delivers a comprehensive view of the U.S. trade landscape.
Key Data Fields
Company Name: Lists companies involved in trade transactions, helping identify potential partners or competitors and track industry-specific trade patterns. Trade Volume: Details the quantity or value of goods traded, offering insights into the scale and economic impact of trade activities. Product Category: Specifies the types of goods traded, such as raw materials or consumer products, aiding in understanding market demand and supply chain dynamics. Import/Export Country: Identifies the countries of origin or destination for traded goods, providing information on regional trade relationships and market access. Transaction Date: Records the date of transactions, revealing seasonal trends and shifts in trade dynamics over time.
Top Trade Trends in the U.S.
Trade Deficit Dynamics: The U.S. continues to face a notable trade deficit, particularly with major partners like China and the European Union. Efforts are ongoing to address these imbalances through various policy measures and agreements. China-U.S. Trade Relations: The trade relationship with China remains pivotal, characterized by negotiations, tariffs, and agreements that impact global trade flows and supply chains. Shift Towards Regional Trade Agreements: There is a growing emphasis on regional agreements, such as the USMCA, which replaces NAFTA, reflecting a trend toward localized trade solutions. Growth in Technology and E-Commerce: Increased trade in technology products and a surge in e-commerce are reshaping trade patterns and logistics. Sustainability and Environmental Regulations: The U.S. is incorporating sustainability into trade policies, focusing on reducing carbon emissions and promoting green technologies. Notable Companies in U.S. Trade Data Apple Inc.: A major exporter of electronics and software, including iPhones and MacBooks, highlighting its significant role in U.S. trade. Amazon.com, Inc.: A leading e-commerce company with a substantial impact on international trade through its global sales and logistics network. Boeing Company: A key player in aerospace, exporting aircraft and components, contributing significantly to U.S. trade. Microsoft Corporation: Exporter of software, cloud services, and hardware, reflecting the importance of tech exports in the U.S. economy. ExxonMobil Corporation: A major exporter of energy products, including crude oil and refined products, impacting the energy sector of U.S. trade. Accessing Techsalerator’s Data
To obtain Techsalerator’s Import/Export Trade Data for the United States, please reach out to info@techsalerator.com with your requirements. Techsalerator will provide a customized quote based on your data needs, with delivery available within 24 hours. Ongoing access options can also be discussed.
Included Data Fields:
Company Name Trade Volume Product Category Import/Export Country Transaction Date Shipping Details Customs Codes Trade Value
For detailed insights into U.S. import and export activities and trends, Techsalerator’s dataset is an invaluable resource for staying informed and making strategic decisions.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Trump urges China to quadruple U.S. soybean orders to reduce trade deficits, sparking market reactions and skepticism from trade analysts.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
We measure the tariff shocks by matching the U.S. products of Section 301 Tariffs with China provincial customs export data in 2017, the year before the trade war.First, based on the tariffed product lists released by the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR), which specify products at the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) eight-digit code level, we calculate the proportion of tariffed product categories under each six-digit HTS code. For instance, under the U.S. HTS-6 code 6309.29 (tents of other textile material), the corresponding sub-code includes 6306.29.11 (tents of cotton) and 6306.29.21 (tents made of other materials), with only 6306.29.11 being subject to additional tariffs. Thus, the tariffed rate for HTS code 6309.29 is 50%.Second, since the HTS-6 codes are consistent under the Harmonized System (HS) across countries, we estimate the scale of Chinese export affected by the trade war by multiplying the export data of HS-6 products by the corresponding HTS-6 tariffed rate.Third, we further adjust for provincial differences by dividing each province’s tariff-affected export scale by its total export scale.Fourth, the intensity of tariffs varied across the four rounds of the trade war. In the first three rounds, listed products were subjected to a 25% tariff, whereas the fourth round, while covering nearly all remaining U.S.-bound exports, had a lower tariff rate (7.5%), following the signing of the “Phase One” trade agreement between China and the U.S. in January 2020. To account for these differences, we assign a weight of 0.25 to the first three rounds and a weight of 0.075 to the fourth round. The weighted sum serves as a proxy variable for the provincial exposure of the U.S.-China trade war.
Facebook
TwitterApache License, v2.0https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
License information was derived automatically
Techsalerator’s Import/Export Trade Data for the United States
Techsalerator’s Import/Export Trade Data for the United States offers a comprehensive and insightful collection of information on international trade activities involving U.S. companies. This dataset provides a detailed examination of trade transactions, documenting and classifying imports and exports across various industries within the U.S.
To obtain Techsalerator’s Import/Export Trade Data for the United States, please reach out to info@techsalerator.com or visit Techsalerator Contact Us with your specific requirements. Techsalerator will provide a customized quote based on your data needs, with delivery available within 24 hours. Ongoing access options can also be discussed.
Techsalerator's Import/Export Trade Data for the United States delivers a thorough analysis of trade activities, integrating data from customs reports, trade agreements, and shipping records. This comprehensive dataset helps businesses, investors, and trade analysts understand the U.S. trade landscape in detail.
Key Data Fields
Top Trade Trends in the United States
Notable Companies in U.S. Trade Data
Accessing Techsalerator’s Data
To obtain Techsalerator’s Import/Export Trade Data for the United States, please contact us at info@techsalerator.com with your requirements. We will provide a customized quote based on the number of data fields and records needed, with delivery available within 24 hours. Ongoing access options can also be discussed.
Included Data Fields:
For detailed insights into the United States’ import and export activities and trends, Techsalerator’s dataset is an invaluable resource for staying informed and making strategic decisions.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://scoop.market.us/privacy-policyhttps://scoop.market.us/privacy-policy
The US tariff policies have significantly impacted the global trade management market, leading to both opportunities and challenges for businesses. In particular, tariffs on imported goods have increased the complexity of managing cross-border trade, requiring businesses to implement more sophisticated trade management solutions.
As companies face rising costs due to tariffs, the demand for trade management systems that help optimize customs compliance, minimize duties, and streamline logistics has surged. Furthermore, sectors such as manufacturing, retail, and transportation have felt the brunt of these tariffs, with industries directly impacted by increased trade barriers.
➤➤➤ Get More Insights about US Tariff Impact Analysis @ https://market.us/report/trade-management-market/free-sample/
For example, the retail sector has seen a rise in goods costs, ultimately affecting margins. The US tariff impact on sectors like manufacturing and retail is approximately 10-15% as they deal with higher raw material costs and inventory disruptions. Companies now look for more automation and integrated solutions to mitigate these costs and streamline operations.
The US tariffs have led to an increased cost of imports, pushing businesses to adopt more efficient trade management systems. As tariffs increase, businesses are forced to reevaluate their supply chain strategies, leading to higher operational costs. In the long term, this could prompt global shifts in trade flows.
US tariffs have disproportionately affected countries with high trade volumes with the US, especially China, Mexico, and Canada. As tariffs increase, businesses in these regions must adapt to higher costs and potential disruptions. This shift influences regional trade agreements and the movement of goods, altering global trade dynamics.
US tariffs have forced businesses to invest in advanced trade management technologies to mitigate the effects of increased import duties and logistical delays. Companies are now focusing on automation, compliance optimization, and cost-effective solutions to navigate the growing complexities of international trade. Small and medium-sized enterprises face considerable challenges.
Facebook
TwitterOpen Database License (ODbL) v1.0https://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
Data of Electronic appendices
Facebook
TwitterWe employ a new, commodity-level dataset on the flow of goods between fifteen major treaty ports to estimate a general-equilibrium trade model for China in the late Qing era. The distribution of welfare effects depends critically on each port's productivity, China's economic geography as it influences trade costs, as well as the degree of regional diversity in production, which increases the potential gains from trade. We utilize this framework to quantify the size and distribution of welfare effects resulting from new technology and lower trade costs that emerged during the Treaty-Port Era. Our results suggest that the new trade with foreign countries led to significant changes in domestic trade relationships. There was a limit to how much could be gained through increased domestic trade, however, because differences in productivity across regions were relatively low.
Facebook
TwitterIn 2024, the value of goods exported from South Korea to China amounted to about *** billion U.S. dollars. The Free Trade Agreement between the two governments came into force in December 2015.
Facebook
TwitterIn 2024, South Korea's trade balance with China amounted to a deficit of about **** billion U.S. dollars. The Free Trade Agreement between the two governments came into force in December 2015.
Facebook
TwitterApache License, v2.0https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
License information was derived automatically
Techsalerator’s Import/Export Trade Data for Cambodia
Techsalerator’s Import/Export Trade Data for Cambodia offers a thorough and insightful collection of information on international trade activities involving Cambodian companies. This dataset provides a detailed examination of trade transactions, documenting and classifying imports and exports across various industries within Cambodia.
To obtain Techsalerator’s Import/Export Trade Data for Cambodia, please reach out to info@techsalerator.com or visit https://www.techsalerator.com/contact-us with your specific requirements. Techsalerator will provide a customized quote based on your data needs, with delivery available within 24 hours. Ongoing access options can also be discussed.
Techsalerator's Import/Export Trade Data for Cambodia delivers a comprehensive analysis of trade activities, integrating data from customs reports, trade agreements, and shipping records. This dataset helps businesses, investors, and trade analysts understand Cambodia’s trade landscape in detail.
Key Data Fields
Top Trade Trends in Cambodia
Notable Companies in Cambodian Trade Data
Accessing Techsalerator’s Data
To obtain Techsalerator’s Import/Export Trade Data for Cambodia, please contact us at info@techsalerator.com with your requirements. We will provide a customized quote based on the number of data fields and records needed, with delivery available within 24 hours. Ongoing access options can also be discussed.
Included Data Fields:
For detailed insights into Cambodia’s import and export activities and trends, Techsalerator’s dataset is an invaluable resource for staying informed and making strategic decisions.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Literature on China exchange rate and trade.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This paper attempts to identify structural constraints to growth and exports within Cambodia’s key industries and to consider the policy actions needed to reduce obstacles to trade. Special emphasis is placed on exports to China, given the major export opportunities arising from the ASEAN– PRC Free Trade Agreement (ACFTA). A qualitative case study method was applied at the firm level by conducting face-to-face interviews to identify the impediments to the growth and exports of key industries in Cambodia, and to examine the opportunities and challenges presented by the ACFTA. This study covers the garment and food industries, which are critical to economic development. The study also provides policy recommendations at both the industry and government levels.
Facebook
TwitterOpen Government Licence - Canada 2.0https://open.canada.ca/en/open-government-licence-canada
License information was derived automatically
The Canada Gazette is the official newspaper of the Government of Canada. Learn about new statutes, new and proposed regulations, administrative board decisions and public notices. To enhance transparency and accessibility, Global Affairs Canada (GAC) has proactively published relevant content to the Open Government Portal, making these records easier to find, search, and reuse by the public, researchers, and civil society. Please note, any releases after 2024-11-04 have not been published. For official records or any inquiries related to these notices, please consult the Canada Gazette website - https://gazette.gc.ca/
Facebook
TwitterDeal Fastener Dongguan Limited China Export Import Data. Follow the Eximpedia platform for HS code, importer-exporter records, and customs shipment details.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
U.S. stock futures remained stable as markets await U.S.-China trade talk results. Investors are hopeful for improved relations following a preliminary agreement, despite recent tensions.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Contemporaneous effect of foreign variables on domestic variables.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The data and programs replicate tables and figures from "The US–China Phase One trade deal: An economic analysis of the managed trade agreement", by Funke and Wende. Please see the ReadMe file for additional details.