This statistic displays the share of Greek households which own selected electronic goods in 2017. A 58 percent share of respondents owned an internet connection at home while 61 percent had a smartphone.

In StatBank Denmark, you will find statistics on emergency response operations. Before you disclose data from the statistics bank, we encourage you to contact us at helpdesk@odin.dk so that we can advise you on the use of data. If you use figures from StatBank Denmark, the source must be stated as: ‘Source: The Danish Emergency Management Agency, Statbank of the Danish Emergency Management Agency.” In StatBank Denmark you can find statistics on, among other things, emergency response to fire, rescue and environmental accidents, as well as summaries of alert messages to the emergency services. You can also compile statistics yourself by choosing your own search criteria. The figures can, for example, be presented on a national basis, per region or municipality, or for the individual fire station. You can choose between the periods day, week, month or year. Employees in the municipal emergency services can also extract data. Data in the StatBank primarily comes from ODIN - the Danish Emergency Management Agency's Online Data Registration and INd Reporting System, where the Danish Emergency Management Agency fills out reports with information about their emergency response and capacity. Reports in pdf format with statistics from all years since 1998 (under "Annual Statistics") are also available here: https://www.brs.dk/en/rescue preparedness authority/knowledge2 data-and-documentation/rescue preparedness statistics bank/

This statistic displays the share of Portugese households which own selected electronic goods in 2015. A 63 percent share of respondents owned an internet connection at home while 44 percent owned a smartphone.

This statistic displays the share of Polish households which own selected electronic goods in 2017. A 66 percent share of respondents owned an internet connection at home while 55 percent owned a smartphone.

We collect, validate, model, and segment raw data signals from over 900+ sources globally to deliver thousands of mobile audience segments. We then combine that data with other public and private data sources to derive interests, intent, and behavioral attributes. Our proprietary algorithms then clean, enrich, unify and aggregate these data sets for use in our products. We have categorized our audience data into consumable categories such as interest, demographics, behavior, geography, etc. Audience Data Categories:Below mentioned data categories include consumer behavioral data and consumer profiles (available for the US and Australia) divided into various data categories. Brand Shoppers:Methodology: This category has been created based on the high intent of users in terms of their visits to Brand outlets in the real world. To create segments containing users with a high-affinity index, we use a precise determination of the number of occurrences at a given time. Place Category Visitors:Methodology: This category has been created based on the high intent of users visiting specific places of interest in the real world. To create segments containing users with a high-affinity index, we use a precise determination of the number of occurrences at a given time. Demographics:This category has been created based on deterministic data that we receive from apps based on the declared gender and age data. Marital Status, Education, Party affiliation, and State residency are available in the US. Geo-Behavioural:This category has been created based on the high intent of users in terms of the frequency of their visits to specific granular places of interest in the real world. To create segments containing users with a high-affinity index, we use a precise determination of the number of occurrences at a given time. Interests:This segment is created based on users' interest in a specific subject while browsing the internet when the visited website category is clearly focused on a specific subject such as cars, cooking, traveling, etc. We use a deterministic model to assign a proper profile and time that information is valid. The recency of data can range from 14 to 30 days, depending on the topic. Intent:Factori receives data from many partners to deliver high-quality pieces of information about users’ shopping intent. We collect data from sources connected to the eCommerce sector and we also receive data connected to online transactions from affiliate networks to deliver the most accurate segments with purchase intentions, such as laptops, mobile phones, or cars. The recency of data can range from 7 to 14 days depending on the product category. Events:This category was created based on the high interest of users in terms of content related to specific global events - sports, culture, and gaming. Among the event segments, we also distinguish categories related to the interest in certain lifestyle choices and behaviors. To create segments containing users with a high-affinity index, we use a precise determination of the number of occurrences at a given time. App Usage:Mobile category is a branch of the taxonomy that is dedicated only to the data that is based on mobile advertising IDs. It is based on the categorization of the mobile apps that the user has installed on the device. Auto Ownership:Consumer Profiles - Available for US and AustraliaThis audience has been created based on users declaring that they own a certain brand of automobile and other automotive attributes via a survey or registration. These audiences are currently available in the USA. Motorcycle Ownership:Consumer Profiles - Available for US and AustraliaThis audience has been created based on users declaring that they own a certain brand of motorcycle and other motorcycle-based attributes via a survey or registration. These audiences are currently available for the USA. Household:Consumer Profiles - Available for the US and AustraliaThis audience has been created based on users' declaring their marital status, parental status, and the overall number of children via a survey or registration. These audiences are currently available in the USA. Financial:Consumer Profiles - Available for the US and Australia this audience has been created based on their behavior in different financial services like property ownership, mortgage, investing behavior, and wealth and declaring their estimated net worth via a survey or registration. Purchase/ Spending Behavior:Consumer Profiles - Available for the US and AustraliaThis audience has been created based on their behavior in different spending behaviors in different business verticals available in the USA. Clusters:Consumer Profiles - Available for the US and AustraliaClusters are groups of consumers who exhibit similar demographic, lifestyle, and media consumption characteristics, empowering marketers to understand the unique attributes that comprise their most profitable consumer segments. Armed with this rich data, data scientists can drive analytics and modeling to power their brand’s unique marketing initiatives. B2B Audiences;Consumer Profiles - Available for US and AustraliaThis audience has been created based on users declaring their employee credentials, designations, and companies they work in, further specifying business verticals, revenue breakdowns, and headquarters locations. Customizable Audiences Data Segment:Brands can choose the appropriate pre-made audience segments or ask our data experts about creating a custom segment that is precisely tailored to your brief in order to reach their target customers and boost the campaign's effectiveness. Location Query Granularity:Minimum area: HEX 8Maximum area: QuadKey 17/City

The National Insect and Disease Risk map identifies areas with risk of significant tree mortality due to insects and plant diseases. The layer identifies lands in three classes: areas with risk of tree mortality from insects and disease between 2013 and 2027, areas with lower tree mortality risk, and areas that were formerly at risk but are no longer at risk due to disturbance (human or natural) between 2012 and 2018. Areas with risk of tree mortality are defined as places where at least 25% of standing live basal area greater than one inch in diameter will die over a 15-year time frame (2013 to 2027) due to insects and diseases.The National Insect and Disease Risk map, produced by the US Forest Service FHAAST, is part of a nationwide strategic assessment of potential hazard for tree mortality due to major forest insects and diseases. Dataset Summary Phenomenon Mapped: Risk of tree mortality due to insects and diseaseUnits: MetersCell Size: 30 meters in Hawaii and 240 meters in Alaska and the Contiguous USSource Type: DiscretePixel Type: 2-bit unsigned integerData Coordinate System: NAD 1983 Albers (Contiguous US), WGS 1984 Albers (Alaska), Hawaii Albers (Hawaii)Mosaic Projection: North America Albers Equal Area ConicExtent: Alaska, Hawaii, and the Contiguous United States Source: National Insect Disease Risk MapPublication Date: 2018ArcGIS Server URL: https://landscape11.arcgis.com/arcgis/This layer was created from the 2018 version of the National Insect Disease Risk Map.What can you do with this Layer? This layer is suitable for both visualization and analysis across the ArcGIS system. This layer can be combined with your data and other layers from the ArcGIS Living Atlas of the World in ArcGIS Online and ArcGIS Pro to create powerful web maps that can be used alone or in a story map or other application.Because this layer is part of the ArcGIS Living Atlas of the World it is easy to add to your map:In ArcGIS Online you can add this layer to a map by selecting Add then Browse Living Atlas Layers. A window will open. Type "insects and disease" in the search box and browse to the layer. Select the layer then click Add to Map.In ArcGIS Pro open a map and select Add Data from the Map Tab. Select Data at the top of the drop down menu. The Add Data dialog box will open on the left side of the box, expand Portal if necessary, then select Living Atlas. Type "insects and disease" in the search box, browse to the layer then click OK.In ArcGIS Pro you can use raster functions to create your own custom extracts of the data. Imagery layers provide fast, powerful inputs to geoprocessing tools, models, or Python scripts in Pro. For example, Zonal Statistics as Table tool can be used to summarize risk of tree mortality across several watersheds, counties, or other areas that you may be interested in such as areas near homes.In ArcGIS Online you can change then layer's symbology in the image display control, set the layer's transparency, and control the visible scale range.The ArcGIS Living Atlas of the World provides an easy way to explore many other beautiful and authoritative maps on hundreds of topics like this one.

This layer shows median household income by race and by age of householder. This is shown by tract, county, and state boundaries. This service is updated annually to contain the most currently released American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year data, and contains estimates and margins of error. There are also additional calculated attributes related to this topic, which can be mapped or used within analysis. Median income and income source is based on income in past 12 months of survey. This layer is symbolized to show median household income. To see the full list of attributes available in this service, go to the "Data" tab, and choose "Fields" at the top right. Current Vintage: 2019-2023ACS Table(s): B19013B, B19013C, B19013D, B19013E, B19013F, B19013G, B19013H, B19013I, B19049, B19053Data downloaded from: Census Bureau's API for American Community Survey Date of API call: December 12, 2024National Figures: data.census.govThe United States Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS):About the SurveyGeography & ACSTechnical DocumentationNews & UpdatesThis ready-to-use layer can be used within ArcGIS Pro, ArcGIS Online, its configurable apps, dashboards, Story Maps, custom apps, and mobile apps. Data can also be exported for offline workflows. For more information about ACS layers, visit the FAQ. Please cite the Census and ACS when using this data.Data Note from the Census:Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables.Data Processing Notes:This layer is updated automatically when the most current vintage of ACS data is released each year, usually in December. The layer always contains the latest available ACS 5-year estimates. It is updated annually within days of the Census Bureau's release schedule. Click here to learn more about ACS data releases.Boundaries come from the US Census TIGER geodatabases, specifically, the National Sub-State Geography Database (named tlgdb_(year)_a_us_substategeo.gdb). Boundaries are updated at the same time as the data updates (annually), and the boundary vintage appropriately matches the data vintage as specified by the Census. These are Census boundaries with water and/or coastlines erased for cartographic and mapping purposes. For census tracts, the water cutouts are derived from a subset of the 2020 Areal Hydrography boundaries offered by TIGER. Water bodies and rivers which are 50 million square meters or larger (mid to large sized water bodies) are erased from the tract level boundaries, as well as additional important features. For state and county boundaries, the water and coastlines are derived from the coastlines of the 2023 500k TIGER Cartographic Boundary Shapefiles. These are erased to more accurately portray the coastlines and Great Lakes. The original AWATER and ALAND fields are still available as attributes within the data table (units are square meters).The States layer contains 52 records - all US states, Washington D.C., and Puerto RicoCensus tracts with no population that occur in areas of water, such as oceans, are removed from this data service (Census Tracts beginning with 99).Percentages and derived counts, and associated margins of error, are calculated values (that can be identified by the "_calc_" stub in the field name), and abide by the specifications defined by the American Community Survey.Field alias names were created based on the Table Shells file available from the American Community Survey Summary File Documentation page.Negative values (e.g., -4444...) have been set to null, with the exception of -5555... which has been set to zero. These negative values exist in the raw API data to indicate the following situations:The margin of error column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute a standard error and thus the margin of error. A statistical test is not appropriate.Either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute an estimate, or a ratio of medians cannot be calculated because one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution.The median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution, or in the upper interval of an open-ended distribution. A statistical test is not appropriate.The estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate.The data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small.

NFL Football Stats

My family has always been serious about fantasy football. I've managed my own team since elementary school. It's a fun reason to talk with each other on a weekly basis for almost half the year.

Ever since I was in 8th grade I've dreamed of building an AI that could draft players and choose lineups for me. I started off in Excel and have since worked my way up to more sophisticated machine learning. The one thing that I've been lacking is really good data, which is why I decided to scrape pro-football-reference.com for all recorded NFL player data.

From what I've been able to determine researching, this is the most complete public source of NFL player stats available online. I scraped every NFL player in their database going back to the 1940s. That's over 25,000 players who have played over 1,000,000 football games.

The scraper code can be found here. Feel free to user, alter, or contribute to the repository.

The data was scraped 12/1/17-12/4/17

Shameless plug

When I uploaded this dataset back in 2017, I had two people reach out to me who shared my passion for fantasy football and data science. We quickly decided to band together to create machine-learning-generated fantasy football predictions. Our website is https://gridironai.com. Over the last several years, we've worked to add dozens of data sources to our data stream that's collected weekly. Feel free to use this scraper for basic stats, but if you'd like a more complete dataset that's updated every week, check out our site.

The data is broken into two parts. There is a players table where each player has been assigned an ID and a game stats table that has one entry per game played. These tables can be linked together using the player ID.

Player Profile Fields

• Player ID: The assigned ID for the player.
• Name: The player's full name.
• Position: The position the player played abbreviated to two characters. If the player played more than one position, the position field will be a comma-separated list of positions (i.e. "hb,qb").
• Height: The height of the player in feet and inches. The data format is

This statistic shows the percentage of the French who would potentially like to create their own startup in the field of new technologies someday, in a survey from 2018. It appears that nearly 80 percent of the respondents did not envisage to create their startup in new technologies.