The cities annex feature class is intended to track city and town annexations in Maricopa County, Arizona.

This dataset contains the Maricopa County, Arizona City Council District boundaries for those cities with council districts. This includes Phoenix, Surprise, Buckeye, Peoria, Glendale and Mesa.

The City of Tempe ZIP Codes feature class is intended to show the USPS ZIP Code boundaries within Tempe, Arizona.

Cumulation of the weekly release of COVID-19 data for Maricopa County by City. Includes COVID Case Rate per 100k population as viewed on the Maricopa County School Reopening Dashboard map by week. For more information about the data, visit: https://www.maricopa.gov/5594/School-Metrics.

Cumulation of the weekly release of COVID-19 data for Maricopa County by City. Includes PCR Test Percent Positivity as viewed on the Maricopa County School Reopening Dashboard map by week. For more information about the data, visit: https://www.maricopa.gov/5594/School-Metrics.

The City Voting District boundaries. Data provided by Maricopa County Elections. This layer was created by Maricopa County Recorder's Office - Elections Department and modified to fit the City of Buckeye's data model.

City of Mesa population provided by Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP) updated annually as of July 1. See Population and Housing Unit Estimates. Census PEP estimates are used for state revenue sharing per AZ statute (42-5033.01). This dataset is the authoritative source for all city metrics such as Crimes or Traffic Collisions per 1,000 residents.

2025-2040 population projections provided by Maricopa County Association of Governments (MAG) and adopted June 2023. MAG's planning area and incorporated jurisdiction projections are published at 2023 MAG Socioeconomic Projections

Other sources of population estimates include US Census American Community Survey 1-year and 5-year Estimates at https://citydata.mesaaz.gov/d/n5gn-m5c3 and https://citydata.mesaaz.gov/Economic-Development/d/9nqf-ygw6, Arizona Office of Economic Opportunity (OEO) at https://www.azcommerce.com/oeo/population/population-estimates/ (see link for OEO methodology which differs slightly from official US Census Estimates) and City of Mesa Office of Economic Development at https://www.selectmesa.com/business-environment/demographics (ESRI Community Analyst).

Number of heat related deaths, by place of injury, reported by Maricopa County Public Health Department during heat seasons 2023 and 2024. Heat season is generally identified as May-October. Unless otherwise specified in the column metadata, counts include only injury locations occurring within the city boundary and excludes injury locations in unincorporated county islands. Counts are sourced from county Public Health Department. See column metadata for more details. The "Total-All" column includes individuals whose injuries occurred in areas known as unincorporated county islands—these are neighborhoods or communities that are not officially part of any city, even though they may appear to be within city boundaries.

Because death certificates listed the nearest city as the place of injury, some of these deaths may be recorded under a city name even if they technically happened outside that city’s jurisdiction.

This dataset reports the number of heat-related deaths by location of injury, as recorded by the Maricopa County Public Health Department during the 2023 and 2024 heat seasons (typically May through October).

Unless otherwise noted in the column metadata, counts reflect injuries that occurred within official city boundaries and exclude incidents in unincorporated county islands—areas not formally part of any city.

The "Total-All" column includes deaths from both city areas and unincorporated county islands, where the death certificate listed Mesa as place of initial injury. These islands are neighborhoods that may appear to be inside a city but are not under city jurisdiction.

See also Public Health Heat Related Deaths Dashboard. Zip code centroids sourced from Mesa Zip Codes.

Surficial Geology of the Lower Agua Fria River, Lake Pleasant to Sun City, Maricopa County, Arizona. One report and two map sheets, scale 1:24,000.

Water surface elevations of the base flood as approved by the Federal mergency management Agency (FEMA) for the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM). The base flood elevation, in feet, is in relation to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929. Profile baselines are for the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM). The cross section data are used for the production of Flood Insurance Rate Maps. The Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) show different floodplains with different zone designations. These are primarily for insurance rating purposes, but the zone differentiation can be very helpful for other floodplain management purposes. The differentiated floodplain zones are used for the production of Flood Insurance Rate Maps. Maricopa County has been subdivided into FIRM panels for the publication and distribution of FIRMs. Profile baselines are for the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM).

The eastern Black Canyon City 7 ' Quadrangle and the western Squaw Creek Mesa 7 ' Quadrangle includes the Interstate 17 corridor where it passes through Black Canyon City and Rock Springs and continues north up the steep grade on the southwest slope of Black Mesa (Figure 1). The distribution of surfaces of different ages and sources in the Black Canyon City quadrangle is associated with the Agua Fria River and Quaternary landslides in the southern and northern halves of the quadrangle, respectively. The southern half of the quadrangle is dominated by the incised Agua Fria River and its tributaries (Little Squaw Creek and Moore Gulch). The Agua Fria River has incised up to 60 m into Paleoproterozoic bedrock (Xs) in the11southwestern quarter of the quadrangle. The Little Squaw Creek and Moore Gulch have incised up to 20 m into Chalk Canyon Formation (Tc, Tcl, Tcs) in the southern half of the quadrangle.The northern half of the quadrangle is dominated by Quaternary landslides (Figure 2, 3) ranging from relatively fresh Holocene landslides (Qylsd) to degraded Pleistocene landslides (Qlso). Several older landslide deposits contain younger landslides, indicating that younger mass-wasting events have occurred on older landslide deposits.

Link to the ScienceBase Item Summary page for the item described by this metadata record. Service Protocol: Link to the ScienceBase Item Summary page for the item described by this metadata record. Application Profile: Web Browser. Link Function: information

Tempe is among Arizona's most educated cities, lending to a creative, smart atmosphere. With more than a dozen colleges, trade schools and universities, about 40 percent of our residents over the age of 25 have Bachelor's degrees or higher. Having such an educated and accessible workforce is a driving factor in attracting and growing jobs for residents in the region.The City of Tempe is a member of the Greater Phoenix Economic Council (GPEC) and with the membership staff tracks collaborative efforts to recruit business prospects and locates. The Greater Phoenix Economic Council (GPEC) is a performance-driven, public-private partnership. GPEC partners with the City of Tempe, Maricopa County, 22 other communities and more than 170 private-sector investors to promote the region’s competitive position and attract quality jobs that enable strategic economic growth and provide increased tax revenue for Tempe.This dataset provides the target and actual job creation numbers for the City of Tempe and Greater Phoenix Economic Council (GPEC). The job creation target for Tempe is calculated by multiplying GPEC's target by twice Tempe's proportion of the population.This page provides data for the New Jobs Created performance measure.The performance measure dashboard is available at 5.02 New Jobs Created.Additional InformationSource:Contact: Madalaine McConvilleContact Phone: 480-350-2927Data Source Type: Excel filesPreparation Method: Extracted from GPEC monthly and annual reports and proprietary excel filesPublish Frequency: AnnuallyPublish Method: ManualData Dictionary

Cumulation of the weekly release of COVID-19 data for Maricopa County by City, Zip Code, ESD, HSD, and USD. Includes PCR Test Percent Positivity and COVID Case Rate per 100k population as viewed on the Maricopa County School Reopening Dashboard map by week. For more information about the data, visit: https://www.maricopa.gov/5594/School-Metrics.

This dataset contain the parcels from the Maricopa County Assessor's office. The area covered is in Maricopa County (Phoenix metro area), Arizona. Major cities include Phoenix, Scottsdale, Mesa and Tempe. Various types of property usage are depicted in this layer. The most common are residential, commericial, industrial and agricultural properties. Multiple sources were used to collect the information including but not limitied to CAD packages, aerial photography, and digitizing from paper maps. Adjustments are made where necessary in the process of updating and some parcel lines are only approximate. In cases where a line adjustment might create a loss of landsize it is typically taken out from the right of way to minimize the loss of landsize in the property. The line symbology for different property lines are not available in this dataset. In addition to standard fields the data has unique assessor parcel number for identification, basic temporal information and the location of property.

Base zoning classifications. Does not include overlay zoning. Incorporated PAD Zoning in undeveloped PAD areas. Zones extend to the center of roads in most cases or parcel boundaries.

Plan submitted by: AriBradshaw on 10/20/2021 USER DESCRIPTION: Gave Graham and Greenlee to D2. Gave all of San Tan to D5 and spiralled from there. Gave all of the radically different part of downtown to D1 from D3. USER PLAN OBJECTIVE: Dear Commission, Mappers, Lawyers, and Public:

This map differs from the adopted 5.0 Map in the following ways:

Each district is equal in population.

We have added all of Colorado City and Wickenburg from D9 to D2. We have added the Biltmore/Arcadia-influenced "new Downtown" where First Friday occurs to D1 from D3.

We have added all of San Tan Valley together in D5. This area does not belong in D2 at all. By adding all of San Tan to D5 and by honoring the VRA in D3, D4 is forced to extend further into the East Valley. This means that it has around 50-70k overpopulation if it continues to include land North of the river. For this reason, the natives are united with the Ft. McDowell natives and Scottsdale is united together from D4 to D1.

We have united the Sun Cities together in D9.

The VRA D7 was made more conducive to the VRA by trading parts of Tucson, Yuma (city), and Maricopa (county) with various districts.Pinal's divisions need to make sense if Pinal is to be divided. Florence and Coolidge must go together. Apache Junction and San Tan must go together. Maricopa and Casa Grande should go together - though are more separable than the others. The southernmost part around Red Rock and Saddlebrook ought to be included in D5 no matter what. We understand the commission's hesitation to have an "arm" sticking out from D5, but we feel that these exurban cities have much much much more in common with Tucson than they do with a rural district such as D2 or the Latino VRA-oriented district such as D9. We urge the commission to strongly consider these points considering Pinal County.

We have added Graham and Greenlee Counties to D2. There is no logical reason why these should be included into a southern district. The mining communities of Greenlee County should not have their small voices diluted even further by urban populations. Additionally, the rural lifestyles along the valley in Graham county are much more akin to those in southern Apache and Navajo than in Pima or Santa Cruz.

We understand the hesitation to even consider adding parts of Cochise to D2. However, when faced with the alternatives, no option best respects the populations of towns like Benson or Wilcox as giving them to a rural district like D2. Giving them to D5 effectively nullifies their voice while D2 must take from an urban area instead. We would rather sacrifice appearance of contiguousness for the sake of the voice of the rural communities along the I10 in Cochise County.

We have added Gold Canyon to D5 from D2. However, for population rebalancing in the Phoenix area, we understand if you return it to D2.

Finally, we have added a portion of D8 south of Cave Creek to D1. This community was split down the middle by an arbitrary diagonal so we attempted to balance it.

Thank you so much to the Commission, Mapping Team, Lawyers, and AZ public for your work and dedication to the State of Arizona. God Bless.

Plan submitted by: redistrictadmin on 10/15/2021 USER DESCRIPTION: In this version based off CD Test Map Version 3.0, CD Test Map Version 3.4 looks to remove West Valley cities (Southern section) from District 9 and is left Unassigned. CD Test Map Version 3.4 then extends District 2 into Pinal County, adding Maricopa and the western portion of Casa Grande in order to achieve population balancing. Gila Bend is added to District 7 while the eastern portion of San Tan Valley and Florence is added into District 2. The western border of District 5 is moved into District 4, including East Mesa, South Chandler, and most of Gilbert. The Northern border of District 4 is moved into District one, including Tempe, South Scottsdale, and the entire Salt River Reservation. The Western border of District 1 is moved into District 8. Both Sun City and Sun City West is moved into District 8. The northern part of Peoria is moved into District 9. For more information on the methodology used to create these boundaries, please visit: https://redistricting-irc-az.hub.arcgis.com/pages/draft-maps USER PLAN OBJECTIVE: N/A

Plan submitted by: redistrictadmin on 10/15/2021 USER DESCRIPTION: In this version based off CD Test Map Version 3.4, CD Test Map Version 3.5 looks to match the eastern border of District 7 to that of District 7’s in CD Test Map Version 3.0 in order to achieve population balancing. The eastern border of District 6 is pushed east to take Tucson south of the Rillito River. District 6 is also pushed north into Pinal County, west of I-79. Additions to District 6 include Red Rock, Eloy, Arizona City, Picacho, Maricopa, and some of Casa Grande. For more information on the methodology used to create these boundaries, please visit: https://redistricting-irc-az.hub.arcgis.com/pages/draft-maps USER PLAN OBJECTIVE: N/A

Plan submitted by: AZ71@22 on 11/13/2021 USER DESCRIPTION: This LD map focuses on compromise in Southern AZ. It creates regional communities of interest in contiguous districts based on feedback from the public meetings. USER PLAN OBJECTIVE: PLEASE LOOK AT THIS MAP. This LD map is about compromise in Southern AZ.

MEHL: He gets his wish to keep Marana, Oro Valley, Saddlebrook I & II and Red Rock in Pinal County together in one D17 district.

LERNER: She successfully separates Tanque Verde and Houghton Corridor from NW Tucson to add to the D18 district of Tucson.

PUBLIC COMMENTS: The people of Santa Cruz County keep their county in one district and the communities of Green Valley, Quail Creek and Sahuarita are added entirely to D21 and remain consolidated along with Amado, Tubac & Tumacacori.

ADDITIONAL BENEFIT: The growing region of D16 in the central AZ region of the I-8/I-10 split becomes very competitive in this map version with Maricopa, Casa Grande, Arizona City staying as one entity since those cities have their own growth objective separate from Tucson and Phx.

Thank you. I really feel this map addresses everyone's issues fairly with near perfect population distribution, contiguous districts, supports communities of interest, and makes logical compromises the public is asking for.