Welcome to Apiscrapy, your ultimate destination for comprehensive location-based intelligence. As an AI-driven web scraping and automation platform, Apiscrapy excels in converting raw web data into polished, ready-to-use data APIs. With a unique capability to collect Google Address Data, Google Address API, Google Location API, Google Map, and Google Location Data with 100% accuracy, we redefine possibilities in location intelligence.

Key Features:

Unparalleled Data Variety: Apiscrapy offers a diverse range of address-related datasets, including Google Address Data and Google Location Data. Whether you seek B2B address data or detailed insights for various industries, we cover it all.

Integration with Google Address API: Seamlessly integrate our datasets with the powerful Google Address API. This collaboration ensures not just accessibility but a robust combination that amplifies the precision of your location-based insights.

Business Location Precision: Experience a new level of precision in business decision-making with our address data. Apiscrapy delivers accurate and up-to-date business locations, enhancing your strategic planning and expansion efforts.

Tailored B2B Marketing: Customize your B2B marketing strategies with precision using our detailed B2B address data. Target specific geographic areas, refine your approach, and maximize the impact of your marketing efforts.

Use Cases:

Location-Based Services: Companies use Google Address Data to provide location-based services such as navigation, local search, and location-aware advertisements.

Logistics and Transportation: Logistics companies utilize Google Address Data for route optimization, fleet management, and delivery tracking.

E-commerce: Online retailers integrate address autocomplete features powered by Google Address Data to simplify the checkout process and ensure accurate delivery addresses.

Real Estate: Real estate agents and property websites leverage Google Address Data to provide accurate property listings, neighborhood information, and proximity to amenities.

Urban Planning and Development: City planners and developers utilize Google Address Data to analyze population density, traffic patterns, and infrastructure needs for urban planning and development projects.

Market Analysis: Businesses use Google Address Data for market analysis, including identifying target demographics, analyzing competitor locations, and selecting optimal locations for new stores or offices.

Geographic Information Systems (GIS): GIS professionals use Google Address Data as a foundational layer for mapping and spatial analysis in fields such as environmental science, public health, and natural resource management.

Government Services: Government agencies utilize Google Address Data for census enumeration, voter registration, tax assessment, and planning public infrastructure projects.

Tourism and Hospitality: Travel agencies, hotels, and tourism websites incorporate Google Address Data to provide location-based recommendations, itinerary planning, and booking services for travelers.

Discover the difference with Apiscrapy – where accuracy meets diversity in address-related datasets, including Google Address Data, Google Address API, Google Location API, and more. Redefine your approach to location intelligence and make data-driven decisions with confidence. Revolutionize your business strategies today!

The City Boundary layer, originally created by the Office of City Clerk, bounds the City of Miami to its current limits. The layer is edited and maintained by GIS Team of the City. This layer is a representation of the official City of Miami Boundary Legal Description based on the legal survey of the city, but it is not to be construed as an official survey of the city boundary. It may be used for general reference purposes but not in place of an official survey or other legal instrument.

Vector polygon map data of city limits from Houston, Texas containing 731 features.

City limits GIS (Geographic Information System) data provides valuable information about the boundaries of a city, which is crucial for various planning and decision-making processes. Urban planners and government officials use this data to understand the extent of their jurisdiction and to make informed decisions regarding zoning, land use, and infrastructure development within the city limits.

By overlaying city limits GIS data with other layers such as population density, land parcels, and environmental features, planners can analyze spatial patterns and identify areas for growth, conservation, or redevelopment. This data also aids in emergency management by defining the areas of responsibility for different emergency services, helping to streamline response efforts during crises..

This city limits data is available for viewing and sharing as a map in a Koordinates map viewer. This data is also available for export to DWG for CAD, PDF, KML, CSV, and GIS data formats, including Shapefile, MapInfo, and Geodatabase.

Contains data from CARTO.CTYLIMIT.Updated as needed.

Author: J Benolkin, educator, Minnesota Alliance for Geographic EducationGrade/Audience: high schoolResource type: lessonSubject topic(s): urban geography, gisRegion: united statesStandards: Minnesota Social Studies Standards

Standard 1. People use geographic representations and geospatial technologies to acquire, process and report information within a spatial context.

Standard 6. Geographic factors influence the distribution, functions, growth and patterns of cities and human settlements.Objectives: Students will be able to:

1. Create a custom map using Google Maps.
2. Apply one of three urban models to a U.S. city or urban area.Summary: This lesson follows an introduction to Urban Models. It asks students to apply the urban models of Concentric Zone, Sector, and Multi-Nuclei to U.S. cities.

Vector polygon map data of city limits from Fort Worth, Texas containing 15 features.

City limits GIS (Geographic Information System) data provides valuable information about the boundaries of a city, which is crucial for various planning and decision-making processes. Urban planners and government officials use this data to understand the extent of their jurisdiction and to make informed decisions regarding zoning, land use, and infrastructure development within the city limits.

By overlaying city limits GIS data with other layers such as population density, land parcels, and environmental features, planners can analyze spatial patterns and identify areas for growth, conservation, or redevelopment. This data also aids in emergency management by defining the areas of responsibility for different emergency services, helping to streamline response efforts during crises..

This city limits data is available for viewing and sharing as a map in a Koordinates map viewer. This data is also available for export to DWG for CAD, PDF, KML, CSV, and GIS data formats, including Shapefile, MapInfo, and Geodatabase.

The Digital Geologic-GIS Map of City of Rocks National Reserve and Vicinity, Idaho is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables, and is available in the following GRI-supported GIS data formats: 1.) a 10.1 file geodatabase (ciro_geology.gdb), a 2.) Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geopackage, and 3.) 2.2 KMZ/KML file for use in Google Earth, however, this format version of the map is limited in data layers presented and in access to GRI ancillary table information. The file geodatabase format is supported with a 1.) ArcGIS Pro map file (.mapx) file (ciro_geology.mapx) and individual Pro layer (.lyrx) files (for each GIS data layer), as well as with a 2.) 10.1 ArcMap (.mxd) map document (ciro_geology.mxd) and individual 10.1 layer (.lyr) files (for each GIS data layer). The OGC geopackage is supported with a QGIS project (.qgz) file. Upon request, the GIS data is also available in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format. Contact Stephanie O'Meara (see contact information below) to acquire the GIS data in these GIS data formats. In addition to the GIS data and supporting GIS files, three additional files comprise a GRI digital geologic-GIS dataset or map: 1.) A GIS readme file (ciro_geology_gis_readme.pdf), 2.) the GRI ancillary map information document (.pdf) file (ciro_geology.pdf) which contains geologic unit descriptions, as well as other ancillary map information and graphics from the source map(s) used by the GRI in the production of the GRI digital geologic-GIS data for the park, and 3.) a user-friendly FAQ PDF version of the metadata (ciro_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Please read the ciro_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the GIS data and other map files. Google Earth software is available for free at: https://www.google.com/earth/versions/. QGIS software is available for free at: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/. Users are encouraged to only use the Google Earth data for basic visualization, and to use the GIS data for any type of data analysis or investigation. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/geologic-resources-inventory-products.htm. For more information about the Geologic Resources Inventory Program visit the GRI webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/gri,htm. At the bottom of that webpage is a "Contact Us" link if you need additional information. You may also directly contact the program coordinator, Jason Kenworthy (jason_kenworthy@nps.gov). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: U.S. Geological Survey. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (ciro_geology_metadata.txt or ciro_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:24,000 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 12.2 meters or 40 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in Google Earth, ArcGIS, QGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm).

The digital map market, currently valued at $25.55 billion in 2025, is experiencing robust growth, projected to expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 13.39% from 2025 to 2033. This expansion is fueled by several key factors. The increasing adoption of location-based services (LBS) across various sectors, including transportation, logistics, and e-commerce, is a primary driver. Furthermore, the proliferation of smartphones and connected devices, coupled with advancements in GPS technology and mapping software, continues to fuel market growth. The rising demand for high-resolution, real-time mapping data for autonomous vehicles and smart city initiatives also significantly contributes to market expansion. Competition among established players like Google, TomTom, and ESRI, alongside emerging innovative companies, is fostering continuous improvement in map accuracy, functionality, and data accessibility. This competitive landscape drives innovation and lowers costs, making digital maps increasingly accessible to a broader range of users and applications. However, market growth is not without its challenges. Data security and privacy concerns surrounding the collection and use of location data represent a significant restraint. Ensuring data accuracy and maintaining up-to-date map information in rapidly changing environments also pose operational hurdles. Regulatory compliance with differing data privacy laws across various jurisdictions adds another layer of complexity. Despite these challenges, the long-term outlook for the digital map market remains positive, driven by the relentless integration of location intelligence into nearly every facet of modern life, from personal navigation to complex enterprise logistics solutions. The market's segmentation (although not explicitly provided) likely includes various map types (e.g., road maps, satellite imagery, 3D maps), pricing models (subscriptions, one-time purchases), and industry verticals served. This diversified market structure further underscores its resilience and potential for sustained growth. Recent developments include: December 2022 - The Linux Foundation has partnered with some of the biggest technology companies in the world to build interoperable and open map data in what is an apparent move t. The Overture Maps Foundation, as the new effort is called, is officially hosted by the Linux Foundation. The ultimate aim of the Overture Maps Foundation is to power new map products through openly available datasets that can be used and reused across applications and businesses, with each member throwing their data and resources into the mix., July 27, 2022 - Google declared the launch of its Street View experience in India in collaboration with Genesys International, an advanced mapping solutions company, and Tech Mahindra, a provider of digital transformation, consulting, and business re-engineering solutions and services. Google, Tech Mahindra, and Genesys International also plan to extend this to more than around 50 cities by the end of the year 2022.. Key drivers for this market are: Growth in Application for Advanced Navigation System in Automotive Industry, Surge in Demand for Geographic Information System (GIS); Increased Adoption of Connected Devices and Internet. Potential restraints include: Growth in Application for Advanced Navigation System in Automotive Industry, Surge in Demand for Geographic Information System (GIS); Increased Adoption of Connected Devices and Internet. Notable trends are: Surge in Demand for GIS and GNSS to Influence the Adoption of Digital Map Technology.

Since their introduction in 2012, Local Climate Zones (LCZs) emerged as a new standard for characterizing urban landscapes, providing a holistic classification approach that takes into account micro-scale land-cover and associated physical properties. This global map of Local Climate Zones, at 100m pixel size and representative for the nominal year …

The electronic map market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing adoption of location-based services (LBS), the proliferation of smartphones and connected devices, and the expanding use of GPS technology across various sectors. The market's value, estimated at $15 billion in 2025, is projected to experience a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 12% from 2025 to 2033, reaching approximately $45 billion by 2033. Key drivers include the rising demand for precise navigation systems in the automotive industry, the surge in e-commerce and delivery services relying on efficient route optimization, and the growing importance of location intelligence for urban planning and resource management. Furthermore, advancements in mapping technologies, such as 3D mapping and augmented reality (AR) integration, are further fueling market expansion. While data security and privacy concerns represent a potential restraint, the overall outlook remains positive, fueled by continuous technological advancements and increasing reliance on location data across numerous applications. The market is segmented by various factors, including map type (2D, 3D, etc.), application (navigation, GIS, etc.), and end-user (automotive, government, etc.). Leading companies like ESRI, Google, TomTom, and HERE Technologies are actively shaping the market landscape through innovation and strategic partnerships. Regional variations in market penetration exist, with North America and Europe currently holding a significant share. However, Asia-Pacific is expected to witness the fastest growth due to rapid urbanization and increasing smartphone penetration. The competitive landscape is characterized by both established players and emerging technology companies vying for market share through technological advancements, improved data accuracy, and enhanced user experience. The forecast period of 2025-2033 promises significant opportunities for growth, driven by the continuous integration of electronic maps into various aspects of daily life and the emerging importance of location data in diverse industries.

The dataset and the validation are fully described in a Nature Scientific Data Descriptor https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-019-0265-5

If you want to use this dataset in an interactive environment, then use this link https://mybinder.org/v2/gh/GeographerAtLarge/TravelTime/HEAD

The following text is a summary of the information in the above Data Descriptor.

The dataset is a suite of global travel-time accessibility indicators for the year 2015, at approximately one-kilometre spatial resolution for the entire globe. The indicators show an estimated (and validated), land-based travel time to the nearest city and nearest port for a range of city and port sizes.

The datasets are in GeoTIFF format and are suitable for use in Geographic Information Systems and statistical packages for mapping access to cities and ports and for spatial and statistical analysis of the inequalities in access by different segments of the population.

These maps represent a unique global representation of physical access to essential services offered by cities and ports.

The datasets travel_time_to_cities_x.tif (where x has values from 1 to 12) The value of each pixel is the estimated travel time in minutes to the nearest urban area in 2015. There are 12 data layers based on different sets of urban areas, defined by their population in year 2015 (see PDF report).

travel_time_to_ports_x (x ranges from 1 to 5)

The value of each pixel is the estimated travel time to the nearest port in 2015. There are 5 data layers based on different port sizes.

Format Raster Dataset, GeoTIFF, LZW compressed Unit Minutes

Data type Byte (16 bit Unsigned Integer)

No data value 65535

Flags None

Spatial resolution 30 arc seconds

Spatial extent

Upper left -180, 85

Lower left -180, -60 Upper right 180, 85 Lower right 180, -60 Spatial Reference System (SRS) EPSG:4326 - WGS84 - Geographic Coordinate System (lat/long)

Temporal resolution 2015

Temporal extent Updates may follow for future years, but these are dependent on the availability of updated inputs on travel times and city locations and populations.

Methodology Travel time to the nearest city or port was estimated using an accumulated cost function (accCost) in the gdistance R package (van Etten, 2018). This function requires two input datasets: (i) a set of locations to estimate travel time to and (ii) a transition matrix that represents the cost or time to travel across a surface.

The set of locations were based on populated urban areas in the 2016 version of the Joint Research Centre’s Global Human Settlement Layers (GHSL) datasets (Pesaresi and Freire, 2016) that represent low density (LDC) urban clusters and high density (HDC) urban areas (https://ghsl.jrc.ec.europa.eu/datasets.php). These urban areas were represented by points, spaced at 1km distance around the perimeter of each urban area.

Marine ports were extracted from the 26th edition of the World Port Index (NGA, 2017) which contains the location and physical characteristics of approximately 3,700 major ports and terminals. Ports are represented as single points

The transition matrix was based on the friction surface (https://map.ox.ac.uk/research-project/accessibility_to_cities) from the 2015 global accessibility map (Weiss et al, 2018).

Code The R code used to generate the 12 travel time maps is included in the zip file that can be downloaded with these data layers. The processing zones are also available.

Validation The underlying friction surface was validated by comparing travel times between 47,893 pairs of locations against journey times from a Google API. Our estimated journey times were generally shorter than those from the Google API. Across the tiles, the median journey time from our estimates was 88 minutes within an interquartile range of 48 to 143 minutes while the median journey time estimated by the Google API was 106 minutes within an interquartile range of 61 to 167 minutes. Across all tiles, the differences were skewed to the left and our travel time estimates were shorter than those reported by the Google API in 72% of the tiles. The median difference was −13.7 minutes within an interquartile range of −35.5 to 2.0 minutes while the absolute difference was 30 minutes or less for 60% of the tiles and 60 minutes or less for 80% of the tiles. The median percentage difference was −16.9% within an interquartile range of −30.6% to 2.7% while the absolute percentage difference was 20% or less in 43% of the tiles and 40% or less in 80% of the tiles.

This process and results are included in the validation zip file.

Usage Notes The accessibility layers can be visualised and analysed in many Geographic Information Systems or remote sensing software such as QGIS, GRASS, ENVI, ERDAS or ArcMap, and also by statistical and modelling packages such as R or MATLAB. They can also be used in cloud-based tools for geospatial analysis such as Google Earth Engine.

The nine layers represent travel times to human settlements of different population ranges. Two or more layers can be combined into one layer by recording the minimum pixel value across the layers. For example, a map of travel time to the nearest settlement of 5,000 to 50,000 people could be generated by taking the minimum of the three layers that represent the travel time to settlements with populations between 5,000 and 10,000, 10,000 and 20,000 and, 20,000 and 50,000 people.

The accessibility layers also permit user-defined hierarchies that go beyond computing the minimum pixel value across layers. A user-defined complete hierarchy can be generated when the union of all categories adds up to the global population, and the intersection of any two categories is empty. Everything else is up to the user in terms of logical consistency with the problem at hand.

The accessibility layers are relative measures of the ease of access from a given location to the nearest target. While the validation demonstrates that they do correspond to typical journey times, they cannot be taken to represent actual travel times. Errors in the friction surface will be accumulated as part of the accumulative cost function and it is likely that locations that are further away from targets will have greater a divergence from a plausible travel time than those that are closer to the targets. Care should be taken when referring to travel time to the larger cities when the locations of interest are extremely remote, although they will still be plausible representations of relative accessibility. Furthermore, a key assumption of the model is that all journeys will use the fastest mode of transport and take the shortest path.

The Digital Geologic-GIS Map of Grant's Headquarters at City Point, Petersburg National Battlefield, Virginia is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables, and is available in the following GRI-supported GIS data formats: 1.) a 10.1 file geodatabase (cipo_geology.gdb), a 2.) Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geopackage, and 3.) 2.2 KMZ/KML file for use in Google Earth, however, this format version of the map is limited in data layers presented and in access to GRI ancillary table information. The file geodatabase format is supported with a 1.) ArcGIS Pro map file (.mapx) file (cipo_geology.mapx) and individual Pro layer (.lyrx) files (for each GIS data layer), as well as with a 2.) 10.1 ArcMap (.mxd) map document (cipo_geology.mxd) and individual 10.1 layer (.lyr) files (for each GIS data layer). The OGC geopackage is supported with a QGIS project (.qgz) file. Upon request, the GIS data is also available in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format. Contact Stephanie O'Meara (see contact information below) to acquire the GIS data in these GIS data formats. In addition to the GIS data and supporting GIS files, three additional files comprise a GRI digital geologic-GIS dataset or map: 1.) A GIS readme file (pete_geology_gis_readme.pdf), 2.) the GRI ancillary map information document (.pdf) file (pete_geology.pdf) which contains geologic unit descriptions, as well as other ancillary map information and graphics from the source map(s) used by the GRI in the production of the GRI digital geologic-GIS data for the park, and 3.) a user-friendly FAQ PDF version of the metadata (cipo_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Please read the pete_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the GIS data and other map files. Google Earth software is available for free at: https://www.google.com/earth/versions/. QGIS software is available for free at: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/. Users are encouraged to only use the Google Earth data for basic visualization, and to use the GIS data for any type of data analysis or investigation. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/geologic-resources-inventory-products.htm. For more information about the Geologic Resources Inventory Program visit the GRI webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/gri,htm. At the bottom of that webpage is a "Contact Us" link if you need additional information. You may also directly contact the program coordinator, Jason Kenworthy (jason_kenworthy@nps.gov). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: U.S. Geological Survey. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (cipo_geology_metadata.txt or cipo_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:24,000 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 12.2 meters or 40 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in Google Earth, ArcGIS, QGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm).

The TIGER/Line shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line shapefile is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. The primary legal divisions of most states are termed counties. In Louisiana, these divisions are known as parishes. In Alaska, which has no counties, the equivalent entities are the organized boroughs, city and boroughs, municipalities, and for the unorganized area, census areas. The latter are delineated cooperatively for statistical purposes by the State of Alaska and the Census Bureau. In four states (Maryland, Missouri, Nevada, and Virginia), there are one or more incorporated places that are independent of any county organization and thus constitute primary divisions of their states. These incorporated places are known as independent cities and are treated as equivalent entities for purposes of data presentation. The District of Columbia and Guam have no primary divisions, and each area is considered an equivalent entity for purposes of data presentation. The Census Bureau treats the following entities as equivalents of counties for purposes of data presentation: Municipios in Puerto Rico, Districts and Islands in American Samoa, Municipalities in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and Islands in the U.S. Virgin Islands. The entire area of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the Island Areas is covered by counties or equivalent entities. The boundaries for counties and equivalent entities are as of January 1, 2017, primarily as reported through the Census Bureau's Boundary and Annexation Survey (BAS).

This global accessibility map enumerates land-based travel time to the nearest densely-populated area for all areas between 85 degrees north and 60 degrees south for a nominal year 2015. Densely-populated areas are defined as contiguous areas with 1,500 or more inhabitants per square kilometre or a majority of built-up land cover types coincident with a population centre of at least 50,000 inhabitants. This map was produced through a collaboration between MAP (University of Oxford), Google, the European Union Joint Research Centre (JRC), and the University of Twente, Netherlands.The underlying datasets used to produce the map include roads (comprising the first ever global-scale use of Open Street Map and Google roads datasets), railways, rivers, lakes, oceans, topographic conditions (slope and elevation), landcover types, and national borders. These datasets were each allocated a speed or speeds of travel in terms of time to cross each pixel of that type. The datasets were then combined to produce a "friction surface"; a map where every pixel is allocated a nominal overall speed of travel based on the types occurring within that pixel. Least-cost-path algorithms (running in Google Earth Engine and, for high-latitude areas, in R) were used in conjunction with this friction surface to calculate the time of travel from all locations to the nearest (in time) city. The cities dataset used is the high-density-cover product created by the Global Human Settlement Project. Each pixel in the resultant accessibility map thus represents the modelled shortest time from that location to a city. Authors: D.J. Weiss, A. Nelson, H.S. Gibson, W. Temperley, S. Peedell, A. Lieber, M. Hancher, E. Poyart, S. Belchior, N. Fullman, B. Mappin, U. Dalrymple, J. Rozier, T.C.D. Lucas, R.E. Howes, L.S. Tusting, S.Y. Kang, E. Cameron, D. Bisanzio, K.E. Battle, S. Bhatt, and P.W. Gething. A global map of travel time to cities to assess inequalities in accessibility in 2015. (2018). Nature. doi:10.1038/nature25181

Processing notes: Data were processed from numerous sources including OpenStreetMap, Google Maps, Land Cover mapping, and others, to generate a global friction surface of average land-based travel speed. This accessibility surface was then derived from that friction surface via a least-cost-path algorithm finding at each location the closest point from global databases of population centres and densely-populated areas. Please see the associated publication for full details of the processing.

Source: https://map.ox.ac.uk/research-project/accessibility_to_cities/

The global digital map ecosystem is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing demand for location-based services (LBS) across various sectors. The market, estimated at $150 billion in 2025, is projected to witness a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 12% from 2025 to 2033, reaching approximately $450 billion by 2033. This expansion is fueled by several key factors, including the proliferation of smartphones and connected devices, advancements in mapping technologies like AI-powered map creation and real-time updates, and the growing adoption of autonomous vehicles. The automotive industry, particularly the self-driving car segment, is a major driver, demanding high-precision maps with detailed information about road infrastructure, traffic patterns, and environmental conditions. Furthermore, the increasing integration of digital maps into diverse applications, including navigation, logistics, urban planning, and augmented reality experiences, contributes significantly to market growth. Competitive pressures among established players like Google, TomTom, and Baidu, as well as emerging technology companies, are fostering innovation and expanding the capabilities of digital mapping solutions. However, challenges remain. Data privacy concerns and the need for robust data security are crucial considerations as the amount of location data collected and processed continues to escalate. Furthermore, maintaining the accuracy and timeliness of map data in a rapidly changing world requires substantial investment in data collection, processing, and update mechanisms. Regulatory hurdles and varying data accessibility across different regions also pose obstacles to seamless global deployment. Market segmentation reveals the significant contribution of both civil and military applications, with acquisition, production, and release systems constituting the core technology components. The Asia-Pacific region, particularly China and India, is anticipated to experience the most significant growth due to rapid urbanization, increasing smartphone penetration, and burgeoning digital economies. North America and Europe, while already having mature markets, will also contribute substantially, driven by technological advancements and increased demand for sophisticated mapping solutions in the autonomous vehicle and smart city sectors.

The HD Live Map market is experiencing robust growth, projected to reach a market size of $1279 million in 2025 and exhibiting a remarkable Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 24.8% from 2025 to 2033. This expansion is fueled by several key market drivers, including the increasing adoption of Advanced Driver-Assistance Systems (ADAS) and autonomous driving technologies in both commercial and military applications. The rising demand for precise and real-time location data for improved navigation, safety, and traffic management further contributes to this growth. Technological advancements, such as the development of high-resolution sensor technologies and improved data processing capabilities, are enhancing the accuracy and reliability of HD Live Maps, making them an indispensable component of next-generation vehicle systems. The market is segmented by crowdsourcing and centralized models, reflecting the varied approaches to data acquisition and map creation. Furthermore, application-based segmentation highlights the significant roles of commercial and military sectors, with the former encompassing automotive, logistics, and ride-sharing applications, while the latter emphasizes defense and security operations. Leading players such as TomTom, Google, Alibaba (AutoNavi), and Baidu are actively investing in R&D and strategic partnerships to consolidate their market positions. The competitive landscape is dynamic, with established players and emerging technology firms competing to deliver superior map data and services. The geographical distribution of the HD Live Map market is diverse, with North America and Asia Pacific expected to dominate due to significant investments in autonomous vehicle technology and robust infrastructure development. Europe is also a significant market, driven by strong government support for technological innovation and the growing adoption of connected car services. The market growth will be influenced by factors such as government regulations related to autonomous driving, the cost of data acquisition and processing, and the increasing integration of HD Live Maps into various smart city initiatives. The ongoing development of 5G networks and the rise of IoT devices are also expected to further stimulate market growth in the coming years. Continuous improvement in map accuracy and detail, coupled with wider industry adoption, will remain pivotal to the market's sustained expansion throughout the forecast period.

The Navigation Electronic Map market is experiencing robust growth, projected to reach a market size of $3021 million in 2025, exhibiting a remarkable Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 25.4% from 2019 to 2033. This expansion is fueled by several key factors. The increasing adoption of smartphones and connected vehicles significantly drives demand for accurate and detailed navigation maps, particularly in the rapidly expanding personal use segment. Furthermore, advancements in mapping technologies, including the transition from 2D to higher-resolution 3D mapping, and the integration of advanced features like augmented reality overlays and real-time traffic updates, are enhancing user experience and driving market growth. The commercial and military sectors also contribute significantly, with logistics companies, delivery services, and defense organizations relying heavily on sophisticated navigation systems for efficient operations and strategic planning. Growth is also expected to be fueled by increasing investment in infrastructure development and smart city initiatives, creating a demand for high-precision navigation solutions. However, certain challenges exist. Data privacy concerns and the increasing complexity of map data management could pose challenges. Competition among established players like Google, TomTom, and ESRI, along with the emergence of new entrants, creates a dynamic and competitive landscape. Despite these restraints, the long-term outlook for the Navigation Electronic Map market remains exceptionally positive. The continued integration of navigation systems into various applications, coupled with ongoing technological innovations, will likely sustain high growth rates throughout the forecast period (2025-2033). The market segmentation, encompassing 2D and 3D maps across personal, commercial, and military applications, indicates diverse avenues for growth and caters to specific user requirements. Geographic expansion, particularly in developing regions with rapidly expanding infrastructure projects, also offers significant potential for market expansion.

This global accessibility map enumerates land-based travel time to the nearest densely-populated area for all areas between 85 degrees north and 60 degrees south for a nominal year 2015. Densely-populated areas are defined as a contiguous area with 1,500 or more inhabitants per square kilometre or a majority of built-up land cover types coincident with a population centre of at least 50,000 inhabitants.This dataset is described in "Mapping inequality in accessibility: a global assessment of travel time to cities in 2015" (Weiss et al 2018; doi:10.1038/nature25181)This map was produced through a collaboration between MAP (University of Oxford), Google, the European Union Joint Research Centre (JRC), and the University of Twente, Netherlands.The underlying datasets used to produce the map include roads (comprising the first ever global-scale use of Open Street Map and Google roads datasets), railways, rivers, lakes, oceans, topographic conditions (slope and elevation), landcover types, and national borders. These datasets were each allocated a speed or speeds of travel in terms of time to cross each pixel of that type. The datasets were then combined to produce a "friction surface"; a map where every pixel is allocated a nominal overall speed of travelbased on the types occurring within that pixel. Least-cost-path algorithms (running in Google Earth Engine and, for high-latitude areas, in R) wereused in conjunction with this friction surface to calculate the time of travel from all locations to the nearest (in time) city. The cities dataset used is the high-density-cover product created by the Global Human Settlement Project. Each pixel in the resultant accessibility map thus represents the modelled shortest time from that location to a city.

City limits for the City of Boulder, Colorado.

The United States Census Bureau regularly releases a geodatabase named TIGER. This dataset contains the 2020 census block groups, which is a cluster of blocks within the same census tract that have the same first digit of their four-digit census block number. There are just over 240,000 polygon features covering …