Disclaimer: There is no cost to the end user for this data, however, all users agree to the following disclaimer by virtue of downloading any Albany GIS data. The City of Albany's Infrastructure records, drawings, and other documents have been gathered over many decades, using differing standards for quality control, documentation, and verification. All of the data provided represents current information in a readily available format. While the data provided is generally believed to be accurate, occasionally it proves to be incorrect; thus its accuracy is not warranted. Prior to making any property purchases or other investments based in full or in part upon the material provided, it is specifically advised that you independently field verify the information contained within our records.

Contains 2 datasets:

• lower and single tier municipalities
• upper tier municipalities and districts.

Wisconsin municipal ward data collected in January 2025 by LTSB that was dissolved into municipal boundaries (cities, towns, and villages). [Attribute Definitions]. This data has been collected in regards to state statute 15(4)(br)1. County clerks will transmit municipal, municipal ward, and county supervisory districts in GIS format to LTSB by January 15th and July 15th* per statute 5.15(4)(br)1: "...no later than January 15 and July 15 of each year*, the county clerk shall transmit to the Legislative Technology Services Bureau a report confirming the boundaries of each municipality, ward, and supervisory district in the county together with a map of the county, in an electronic format approved by the Legislative Technology Services Bureau. Each report shall be current to the nearest January 1 or July 1* preceding the date of the report”. (*with the exception of years ending in “01” where data collection will align closer to typical redistricting timelines of March and October 15)Municipal clerks need to notify the county clerk within 5 days of any boundary change per statute 5.15(4)(b): "Within 5 days after adoption or enactment of an ordinance or resolution under this section or any amendment thereto, the municipal clerk shall transmit one copy of the ordinance or resolution or the amendment to the county clerk of each county in which the municipality is contained, accompanied by the list and map specified in par. (a). Each copy shall identify the name of the municipality and the county or counties in which it is located."Municipal data collected in the January collections will be used by LTSB to update municipal boundaries the U.S. Census Bureau’s TIGER database via the Boundary Annexation Survey (BAS). Counties and municipalities are no longer required to submit boundary changes directly to the Census Bureau. LTSB will submit data to the Census Bureau for the state as a whole.Section 13.96(1)(b) of the Wisconsin Statutes requires LTSB to “upon receipt of municipal boundary information at each reporting interval, reconcile and compile the information received to produce a statewide data base consisting of municipal boundary information for the entire state”.Section 13.96(1)(c) states that LTSB shall “Participate, on behalf of this state, in geographic boundary information programs when offered by the U.S. bureau of the census”.LTSB will publish Municipal Wards, Municipal Boundaries (cities, towns, villages), and County Supervisory Districts to the LTSB GIS Hub website.This data has been collected with the LTSB GeoData Collector.*with the exception of years ending in “01” where data collection will align closer to typical redistricting timelines of March and October 15.

Terms of UseData Limitations and DisclaimerThe user’s use of and/or reliance on the information contained in the Document shall be at the user’s own risk and expense. MassDEP disclaims any responsibility for any loss or harm that may result to the user of this data or to any other person due to the user’s use of the Document.This is an ongoing data development project. Attempts have been made to contact all PWS systems, but not all have responded with information on their service area. MassDEP will continue to collect and verify this information. Some PWS service areas included in this datalayer have not been verified by the PWS or the municipality involved, but since many of those areas are based on information published online by the municipality, the PWS, or in a publicly available report, they are included in the estimated PWS service area datalayer.Please note: All PWS service area delineations are estimates for broad planning purposes and should only be used as a guide. The data is not appropriate for site-specific or parcel-specific analysis. Not all properties within a PWS service area are necessarily served by the system, and some properties outside the mapped service areas could be served by the PWS – please contact the relevant PWS. Not all service areas have been confirmed by the systems.Please use the following citation to reference these data:MassDEP, Water Utility Resilience Program. 2024. Community and Non-Transient Non-Community Public Water System Service Area (PubV2024_7).IMPORTANT NOTICE: This MassDEP Estimated Water Service datalayer may not be complete, may contain errors, omissions, and other inaccuracies and the data are subject to change. This version is published through MassGIS. We want to learn about the data uses. If you use this dataset, please notify staff in the Water Utility Resilience Program (WURP@mass.gov).

This GIS datalayer represents approximate service areas for Public Water Systems (PWS) in Massachusetts. In 2017, as part of its “Enhancing Resilience and Emergency Preparedness of Water Utilities through Improved Mapping” (Critical Infrastructure Mapping Project ), the MassDEP Water Utility Resilience Program (WURP) began to uniformly map drinking water service areas throughout Massachusetts using information collected from various sources. Along with confirming existing public water system (PWS) service area information, the project collected and verified estimated service area delineations for PWSs not previously delineated and will continue to update the information contained in the datalayers. As of the date of publication, WURP has delineated Community (COM) and Non-Transient Non-Community (NTNC) service areas. Transient non-community (TNCs) are not part of this mapping project.

Layers and Tables:

The MassDEP Estimated Public Water System Service Area data comprises two polygon feature classes and a supporting table. Some data fields are populated from the MassDEP Drinking Water Program’s Water Quality Testing System (WQTS) and Annual Statistical Reports (ASR).

The Community Water Service Areas feature class (PWS_WATER_SERVICE_AREA_COMM_POLY) includes polygon features that represent the approximate service areas for PWS classified as Community systems.The NTNC Water Service Areas feature class (PWS_WATER_SERVICE_AREA_NTNC_POLY) includes polygon features that represent the approximate service areas for PWS classified as Non-Transient Non-Community systems.The Unlocated Sites List table (PWS_WATER_SERVICE_AREA_USL) contains a list of known, unmapped active Community and NTNC PWS services areas at the time of publication.

Production

Data Universe

Public Water Systems in Massachusetts are permitted and regulated through the MassDEP Drinking Water Program. The WURP has mapped service areas for all active and inactive municipal and non-municipal Community PWSs in MassDEP’s Water Quality Testing Database (WQTS). Community PWS refers to a public water system that serves at least 15 service connections used by year-round residents or regularly serves at least 25 year-round residents.

All active and inactive NTNC PWS were also mapped using information contained in WQTS. An NTNC or Non-transient Non-community Water System refers to a public water system that is not a community water system and that has at least 15 service connections or regularly serves at least 25 of the same persons or more approximately four or more hours per day, four or more days per week, more than six months or 180 days per year, such as a workplace providing water to its employees.

These data may include declassified PWSs. Staff will work to rectify the status/water services to properties previously served by declassified PWSs and remove or incorporate these service areas as needed.

Maps of service areas for these systems were collected from various online and MassDEP sources to create service areas digitally in GIS. Every PWS is assigned a unique PWSID by MassDEP that incorporates the municipal ID of the municipality it serves (or the largest municipality it serves if it serves multiple municipalities). Some municipalities contain more than one PWS, but each PWS has a unique PWSID. The Estimated PWS Service Area datalayer, therefore, contains polygons with a unique PWSID for each PWS service area.

A service area for a community PWS may serve all of one municipality (e.g. Watertown Water Department), multiple municipalities (e.g. Abington-Rockland Joint Water Works), all or portions of two or more municipalities (e.g. Provincetown Water Dept which serves all of Provincetown and a portion of Truro), or a portion of a municipality (e.g. Hyannis Water System, which is one of four PWSs in the town of Barnstable).

Some service areas have not been mapped but their general location is represented by a small circle which serves as a placeholder. The location of these circles are estimates based on the general location of the source wells or the general estimated location of the service area - these do not represent the actual service area.

The service areas were mapped from 2017 to 2022 and may not include all current active PWSs. A list of unmapped PWS systems is included in the USL table PWS_WATER_SERVICE_AREA_USL available for download with the dataset and shown below. Some PWSs that are not mapped may have come online after this iteration of the mapping project; these will be reconciled and mapped during the next phase of the WURP project. PWS IDs that represent regional or joint boards with (e.g. Tri Town Water Board, Randolph/Holbrook Water Board, Upper Cape Regional Water Cooperative) will not be mapped, because their individual municipal service areas are included in this datalayer.

Some PWSs that are not mapped may have come online after this iteration of the mapping project; these will be reconciled and mapped during the next phase of the WURP project. Those highlighted (e.g. Tri Town Water Board, Randolph/Holbrook Water Board, Upper Cape Regional Water Cooperative) represent regional or joint boards that will not be mapped, because their individual municipal service areas are included in this datalayer.

PWSs that do not have corresponding sources, may be part of consecutive systems, may have been incorporated into another PWSs, reclassified as a different type of PWS, or otherwise taken offline. PWSs that have been incorporated, reclassified, or taken offline will be reconciled during the next data update.

Methodologies and Data Sources

Several methodologies were used to create service area boundaries using various sources, including data received from the systems in response to requests for information from the MassDEP WURP project, information on file at MassDEP, and service area maps found online at municipal and PWS websites. When provided with water line data rather than generalized areas, 300-foot buffers were created around the water lines to denote service areas and then edited to incorporate generalizations. Some municipalities submitted parcel data or address information to be used in delineating service areas.

Verification Process

Small-scale PDF file maps with roads and other infrastructure were sent to every PWS for corrections or verifications. For small systems, such as a condominium complex or residential school, the relevant parcels were often used as the basis for the delineated service area. In towns where 97% or more of their population is served by the PWS and no other service area delineation was available, the town boundary was used as the service area boundary. Some towns responded to the request for information or verification of service areas by stating that the town boundary should be used since all or nearly all of the municipality is served by the PWS.

Sources of information for estimated drinking water service areas

The following information was used to develop estimated drinking water service areas:

EOEEA Water Assets Project (2005) water lines (these were buffered to create service areas)Horsely Witten Report 2008Municipal Master Plans, Open Space Plans, Facilities Plans, Water Supply System Webpages, reports and online interactive mapsGIS data received from PWSDetailed infrastructure mapping completed through the MassDEP WURP Critical Infrastructure InitiativeIn the absence of other service area information, for municipalities served by a town-wide water system serving at least 97% of the population, the municipality’s boundary was used. Determinations of which municipalities are 97% or more served by the PWS were made based on the Percent Water Service Map created in 2018 by MassDEP based on various sources of information including but not limited to:The Winter population served submitted by the PWS in the ASR submittalThe number of services from WQTS as a percent of developed parcelsTaken directly from a Master Plan, Water Department Website, Open Space Plan, etc. found onlineCalculated using information from the town on

City Council enacted the new Kingston Zoning Bylaw Number 2022-62 on April 26, 2022. The Kingston Zoning Bylaw regulates the use of lands and the size and location of buildings for almost all properties in the City of Kingston (all properties except those identified as “Not Subject to this By-law”). Two appeals were filed during the appeal period to the Ontario Land Tribunal. On September 28, 2022, the Ontario Land Tribunal issued an oral decision confirming that all of the unappealed portions of Kingston Zoning By-law are now in effect.Portions of the Former Zoning By-laws remain in effect and are identified in By-law 2022-62 as "“Not Subject to this By-law”. The 5 Former zoning bylaws are as follows:> City of Kingston Restricted Area Zoning By-law No. 8499> Downtown and Harbour Restricted Area Zoning By-law No. 96-259> Kingston Township Restricted Area Zoning By-law No. 76-26> Cataraqui North Zoning By-law No. 97-102> Pittsburgh Township Restricted Area Zoning By-law No. 32-74For more information, please contact Planning Services located at 1211 John Counter Boulevard, Phone: 613-546-4291.

Summary: The s-RSA presents the future spatial policy of the city of Antwerp. This policy consists of a generic or city-wide vision and an active or project-based approach. The generic policy can be described as follows: The generic policy is made up of seven images: water city, eco city, port city, railway city, porous city, villages and metropolis and mega city. These images together form the collective memory of the inhabitants and visitors of the city. From a generic approach, strategic policy means prioritising a number of goals, structured according to the images of the city, which in turn determine strategic selections and measures. These selections form the basis for the selection cards. · The images of the city form the frame of reference that every project relating to Antwerp must take into account. This framework is made up of rules drawn up from each image. Since the generic rules apply to the entire territory of the city, the active policy (the spaces, programmes and projects) must also focus on this. The image of the ‘rail city’ is one of the seven images within the s-RSA. This image argues for the opening of the city by increasing its accessibility. This image, because of the literal meaning of tracks, creates the illusion of focusing only on public transport. In reality, this image encompasses all spatial and functional mobility aspects. With regard to car traffic, the city and the port must remain accessible via motorways. As a result, projects such as closing the ring and separating through and destination traffic are conceived. Both have a major impact on the city's lower network, both spatially and in terms of traffic management. The better elaboration of this fine-meshed network should, together with the parent network, ensure the creation of a city with an open spatial system. However, public transport plays an important role in this picture, as a more developed and efficient public transport network can reduce car orientation and thus increase the accessibility of the city and the quality of life in the city. The improvement of public transport translates into: strengthening the territorial boulevards that run from the districts to the inner city (this type of boulevard always contains a tram), designing radial boulevards that connect the different districts (this type desirable contains a tram), completely redesigning a green Singel (for local traffic) improving the coordination between different forms of public transport and with other modes. Purpose: Visualisation of the selection map 04B_spoorstad_fietsroutenetwerk of the sRSA,The demarcations are not hard limits, and can be further specified in the implementation process. The selection map is not a zoning plan or a land use plan. The card does not confirm or deny building rights Creation: The selection maps are the result of the conversion of the seven formatted images of the city into shape format. The autocad maps and the corresponding grids were used as a basis for this. The drawing was done using the large-scale basic map of the city of Antwerp.

This data is kept daily and is therefore always up to date Summary: The s-RSA presents the future spatial policy of the city of Antwerp. This policy consists of a generic or city-wide vision and an active or project-based approach. The generic policy can be described as follows: The generic policy is made up of seven images: water city, eco city, port city, railway city, porous city, villages and metropolis and mega city. These images together form the collective memory of the inhabitants and visitors of the city. From a generic approach, strategic policy means prioritising a number of goals, structured according to the images of the city, which in turn determine strategic selections and measures. These selections form the basis for the selection cards. · The images of the city form the frame of reference that every project relating to Antwerp must take into account. This framework is made up of rules drawn up from each image. · Since the generic rules apply to the entire territory of the city, the active policy (the spaces, programmes and projects) must also focus on this. The 'water city' is one of the seven images within the s-RSA. This image calls for a general restoration of the relationship between the city and the water network within it, in which the relationship with the Scheldt plays a crucial role. The restoration of the water network can be done by making the original structure visible again where it is possible. This means increasing the quality of the public domain around rivers, streams, docks and canals and improving their accessibility. In order to give shape to this image, the parts of the water network were determined on the basis of selections. For example, there were river and stream valleys, historical waters: lakes, dikes, beach, new wet nature, Scheldt bridges and new high-rise areas along the water selected Purpose: Visualization of the selection map 01-water city of the sRSA,The demarcations are not hard limits, and can be further specified in the implementation process. The selection map is not a zoning plan or a land use plan. The card does not confirm or deny building rights Creation: The selection maps are the result of the conversion of the seven formatted images of the city into shape format. The autocad maps and the corresponding grids were used as a basis for this. The drawing was done using the large-scale basic map of the city of Antwerp.

Summary: City of Port Moody Parks, Facilities and Trails MapDisclaimer: The User acknowledges and agrees that the Data is provided by the City to the User for the User's convenience and reference, and that the City makes no guarantees, representations or warranties, whether express or implied, as to the Data or as to any results to be or intended to be achieved from use of the Data, including without limitation guarantees, representations or warranties as to the accuracy, quality or completeness of the Data, merchantability or fitness for use for any particular purpose, and the User hereby waives all guarantees, representations and warranties in respect of the Data, whether express, implied by statute or otherwise. The User hereby releases The City from, and hereby indemnifies and holds harmless The City from and against, any liability, obligation, costs (including without limitation legal costs), expenses, claims, actions, proceedings, damages and penalties to the User or any other person or legal entity resulting from or related to the use, disclosure or reproduction of or reliance on the Data.

Specific information regarding land, including lot sizes, legal descriptions, and charges must be confirmed at the Land Title Office and the User must not rely on the City of Port Moody for this information.

Summary: The s-RSA presents the future spatial policy of the city of Antwerp. This policy consists of a generic or city-wide vision and an active or project-based approach. The generic policy can be described as follows: The generic policy is made up of seven images: water city, eco city, port city, railway city, porous city, villages and metropolis and mega city. These images together form the collective memory of the inhabitants and visitors of the city. From a generic approach, strategic policy means prioritising a number of goals, structured according to the images of the city, which in turn determine strategic selections and measures. These selections form the basis for the selection cards. · The images of the city form the frame of reference that every project relating to Antwerp must take into account. This framework is made up of rules drawn up from each image. Since the generic rules apply to the entire territory of the city, the active policy (the spaces, programmes and projects) must also focus on this. The image of the ‘villages and metropolis’ is one of the seven images within the s-RSA. This image is subdivided into a few subimages: Police-centric city, heritage, living, working and recreation. In the sub-image of ‘villages and metropolis – works’, the Spatial Structure Plan does not directly aim to formulate an economic policy, but the Spatial Structure Plan can be seen as complementary to a development policy and can help and guide sustainable growth by supporting a number of ‘virtuous relationships’ and discouraging a number of others. The objectives to achieve this vision are: preserving the historical clusters, strengthening the economic role of trade and business, allowing for new growth sectors and attracting innovative activities. The selections were made on the basis of two models: clusters and models. This resulted in clusters of business parks and interweaving areas, activity in residential areas, mobilization of empty land and reorganization of residual land, re-use of brownfields, new business areas, new office locations and retail areas. Visualization of the selection map 06D_works of the sRSA,The demarcations are not hard limits, and can be further specified in the implementation process. The selection map is not a zoning plan or a land use plan. The card does not confirm or deny building rights Creation: The selection maps are the result of the conversion of the seven formatted images of the city into shape format. The autocad maps and the corresponding grids were used as a basis for this. The drawing was done using the large-scale basic map of the city of Antwerp.

The parcel outlines represent tax parcel boundaries, not ownership. For Land Ownership please confirm with the Land Registry Office.The parcel lines shown on the map do not represent a Plan of Survey nor do they represent the City’s opinion as to the true location of the parcel line. For an accurate opinion of the boundary location, the user should consult with an Ontario Land Surveyor.This dataset will be updated on a monthly basis. DISCLAIMERPlease be advised GIS_AREA values are based on the NAD83 Zone17N Datum and Shape_Area and Shape_Length Values are based on the WGS84 Web Mercator Datum

Vector polygon map data of property parcels from Las Vegas, Nevada, containing 794,465 features.

Property parcel GIS map data consists of detailed information about individual land parcels, including their boundaries, ownership details, and geographic coordinates.

Property parcel data can be used to analyze and visualize land-related information for purposes such as real estate assessment, urban planning, or environmental management.

Available for viewing and sharing as a map in a Koordinates map viewer. This data is also available for export to DWG for CAD, PDF, KML, CSV, and GIS data formats, including Shapefile, MapInfo, and Geodatabase.

NOTE TO USERS -- There may be disruption to this dataset between March 19 to March 29 related to an upgrade. Do not use this data to make zoning determinations. This data does not show all zoning regulations for an address, including overlays and situations where an address has more than one zoning. Also, the data may be out of date. Use the interactive mapping application https://maps.austintexas.gov/GIS/PropertyProfile/ to make zoning determinations, and call 311 if you have questions about zoning. Zoning only applies to addresses within the City of Austin city limits. This dataset is a list of addresses with their zoning provided to answer questions such as "what property addresses have CS zoning." This data is derived from GIS layer for address and zoning. The place_id field is provided for linking to the addresses GIS layer. This product is produced by the City of Austin for informational purposes. No warranty is made they City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness.

The dataset contains locations and attributes of DC Boundary stones. A database provided by A. Morton Thomas & Associates, Inc. identified DC Boundary stone locations. DC Boundary stones field surveyed by GPS and conventional survey methods. Surveyed accuracy is +/- 5cm horizontal and +/- 9cm vertical.STONES North, NE1, NE8, East, SE1, SE9, SW5, West, NW1, NW2, NW4, NW5, NW9 = Field Survey Method: Conventional - 2 survey control points were set at the site utilizing GPS-RTK. Conventional survey total station was then utilized to data collect angle and distance measurements to the stone. The Stone was located at the top center point for both upright and leaning conditions. 3 color digital photos were obtained for the stone. A measure down was obtained from the top of stone to the ground. STONES NE2, NE3, NE4, NE5, NE6, NE7, NE9, SE2, SE3, SE5, SE6, SE7, SE8, SW1, SW2, SW3, SW4, SW6, SW7, SW8, SW9, NW3, NW7, NW 8 = Field Survey Method: GPS-RTK A minimum of 3 consecutive GPS-RTK observations were made with each observation being a minimum of 30 seconds in length with data collected at 1 second intervals. The observations were averaged to produce the resulting coordinates and data was reviewed to confirm project accuracies were met. The Stone was located at the top center point for both upright and leaning conditions. 3 color digital photos were obtained for the stone. A measure down was obtained from the top of stone to the ground. STONE SE4 = No survey worked performed. Stone is located in private residence waiting to be reset by joint survey society effort. No plans at this time for resetting STONE South = Could not survey due to site being under construction with stone wrapped in burlap and packed in sand. Approximate coordinates (+/- 0.4') obtained from AMT surveyor working for PCC at Woodrow Wilson Bridge

LTSB dissolves municipal ward data into county supervisory districts. Wisconsin municipal ward data was collected in July 2024. [Attribute Definitions]. This data has been collected in regards to state statute 15(4)(br)1. County clerks will transmit municipal, municipal ward, and county supervisory districts in GIS format to LTSB by January 15th and July 15th* per statute 5.15(4)(br)1: "...no later than January 15 and July 15 of each year*, the county clerk shall transmit to the Legislative Technology Services Bureau a report confirming the boundaries of each municipality, ward, and supervisory district in the county together with a map of the county, in an electronic format approved by the Legislative Technology Services Bureau. Each report shall be current to the nearest January 1 or July 1* preceding the date of the report”. (*with the exception of years ending in “01” where data collection will align closer to typical redistricting timelines of March and October 15)Municipal clerks need to notify the county clerk within 5 days of any boundary change per statute 5.15(4)(b): "Within 5 days after adoption or enactment of an ordinance or resolution under this section or any amendment thereto, the municipal clerk shall transmit one copy of the ordinance or resolution or the amendment to the county clerk of each county in which the municipality is contained, accompanied by the list and map specified in par. (a). Each copy shall identify the name of the municipality and the county or counties in which it is located."Municipal data collected in the January collections will be used by LTSB to update municipal boundaries the U.S. Census Bureau’s TIGER database via the Boundary Annexation Survey (BAS). Counties and municipalities are no longer required to submit boundary changes directly to the Census Bureau. LTSB will submit data to the Census Bureau for the state as a whole.Section 13.96(1)(b) of the Wisconsin Statutes requires LTSB to “upon receipt of municipal boundary information at each reporting interval, reconcile and compile the information received to produce a statewide data base consisting of municipal boundary information for the entire state”.Section 13.96(1)(c) states that LTSB shall “Participate, on behalf of this state, in geographic boundary information programs when offered by the U.S. bureau of the census”.LTSB will publish Municipal Wards, Municipal Boundaries (cities, towns, villages), and County Supervisory Districts to the LTSB HUB Data Portal.This data has been collected with the LTSB GeoData Collector.

Summary: The s-RSA proposes a future spatial policy for the city based on a general vision. The strategic map is the synthesis of the active policy to be pursued by the S-RSA. This map is structured as follows: The strategic map consists of 5 strategic areas: hard spine, soft spine, green girth, vivid canal and bearing mesh. A strategic space plays a key role in the active policy of the S-RSA. It is in these spaces that the city wishes to invest with people and resources as a priority for the next 15 years. Within each strategic space, the s-RSA has defined strategic programmes. A strategic programme gives a more specific and pragmatic content to the strategic space. For each programme, the S-RSA has also identified strategic projects: these are the proposed actions with which the structural plan aims to achieve the vision and area-based objectives. Some strategic projects are priorities: These are the so-called leverage actions. The "lower network" is one of the five strategic spaces of the S-RSA. The "lower network" is the fine-meshed network of streets, boulevards, tram and bus lines, bicycle and footpaths that connects the urban or neighborhood centers with each other and with the city center and thus strengthens the various "villages" within Antwerp. In order to improve the identity of each district core, it is necessary to work on a good public domain. The boulevards, together with the shopping streets and the alternative routes, form one of the programs of the "lower network". The East-West boulevards are part of the program for the boulevards. Purpose: Visualization and demarcation of the East-West boulevard of the "lower network" for the city of Antwerp. The demarcations are not hard limits, and can be further specified in the implementation process. In general, the strategic map is not a zoning plan or a land use plan. The card does not confirm or deny building rights Creation: The map layer is the result of the conversion of the strategic spaces to shape format. The autocad maps and the corresponding grids were used as a basis for this. The drawing was done using the large-scale basic map of the city of Antwerp. The map layer indicates where the East-West boulevards of the "lower network" are demarcated.

Draft boundaries for Significant Natural Areas defined in the December 2016 report by Wildlands Ecologists. These boundaries were revised in July 2017 and are currently being updated as the Place Planning team carries out site visits to confirm the boundaries. SNAs are a natural ecosystem or habitat with significant indigenous biodiversity values. SNAs are identified by Wildlands Ecological Specialists against five criteria based on the Regional Policy Statement for Wellington Region. The criteria are: representativeness, rarity, diversity, ecological context, and tangata whenua values. We worked with ecologists and landscape specialists Wildlands and Boffa Miskell to map Wellington’s threatened indigenous flora and fauna based on Department of Conservation classification. We talked to local iwi about special landscapes. Policy 23 of the Regional Policy Statement for the Wellington region states ‘District and regional plans shall identify and evaluate indigenous ecosystems and habitats with significant indigenous biodiversity values; these ecosystems and habitats will be considered significant if they meet one or more of the following criteria: Representativeness: the ecosystems or habitats that are typical and characteristic examples of the full range of the original or current natural diversity of ecosystem and habitat types in a district or in the region, and: Are no longer commonplace (less than about 30 % remaining) Are poorly represented in existing protected areas (less than about 20 % legally protected) Rarity: the ecosystem or habitat has biological or physical features that are scarce or threatened in a local, regional, or national context. This can include individual species, rare and distinctive biological communities and physical features that are unusual or rare. Diversity: the ecosystem or habitat has a natural diversity of ecological units, ecosystems, species and physical features within an area Ecological context of an area: the ecosystem or habitat: Enhances connectivity or otherwise buffers representative, rare or diverse indigenous ecosystems and habitats, or Provides seasonal or core habitat for protected or threatened indigenous species Tangata Whenua Values: the ecosystem or habitat contains characteristics of special spiritual, historical or cultural significance to tangata whenua, identified in accordance with Tikanga Māori. In August 2019, the Place Planning team began engagement with members of the public whose property boundaries overlapped with an outstanding landscape boundary as part of the Backyard Taonga project. In March 2020, the Place Planning team began consultation on the Draft Spatial Plan as a precursor for a full District Plan review. For more information contact the Backyard Taonga project team by email: backyardtaonga@wcc.govt.nz or visit our website: https://planningforgrowth.wellington.govt.nz/about/backyard-taonga

This data has been collected in regards state statute 5.15(4)(br)1. Municipal clerks within 5 days of any boundary change need to notify the county clerk.5.15(4)(b)Within 5 days after adoption or enactment of an ordinance or resolution under this section or any amendment thereto, the municipal clerk shall transmit one copy of the ordinance or resolution or the amendment to the county clerk of each county in which the municipality is contained, accompanied by the list and map specified in par. (a). Each copy shall identify the name of the municipality and the county or counties in which it is located.County clerks will transmit municipal, municipal ward and county supervisory districts in GIS format to LTSB by January 15thand July 15th. ”no later than January 15 and July 15 of each year, the county clerk shall transmit to the legislative technology services bureau a report confirming the boundaries of each municipality, ward, and supervisory district in the county together with a map of the county, in an electronic format approved by the legislative technology services bureau. Each report shall be current to the nearest January 1 or July 1 preceding the date of the report”.Municipal data collected in January will be used by LTSB to update municipal boundaries the U.S. Census Bureau’s TIGER database via the Boundary Annexation Survey (BAS). Counties and municipalities are no longer required to submit boundary changes directly to the Census Bureau. LTSB will submit data to the Census Bureau for the state as a whole.Section 13.96(1)(b)of the Wisconsin Statutes requires LTSB to “upon receipt of municipal boundary information at each reporting interval under s. 5.15 (4) (bg), reconcile and compile the information received to produce a statewide data base consisting of municipal boundary information for the entire state”.13.96(1)(c)LTSB shall “Participate, on behalf of this state, in geographic boundary information programs when offered by the U.S. bureau of the census”.LTSB will publish Municipal Ward, Municipal Boundaries and County Supervisory Districts to the LTSB Open Data Portal located at http://data.ltsb.opendata.arcgis.com/.This data has been collected with the WISE-Decade software platform. For more information on this system please visit http://legis.wisconsin.gov/ltsb/gis/wise-decade/.

Chapel Hill Town Map (JPEG file). This map image was prepared by Deborah Squires/the Chapel Hill Planning Department.

This map service is for use by the public to assist with planning and development enquiries in the City of Logan. It includes key maps from the current version of the Logan Planning Scheme 2015, including zones and zone precincts, local plans and local plan precincts, overlays (incorporating TLPI No.1 2023), local government infrastructure plan (LGIP) maps, and some of the key planning scheme policy (PSP) maps relating to environment (policy 3) and infrastructure (policy 5). These maps are also available as ‘interactive mapping’ in the Logan PD Hub: https://loganhub.com.au . For a full list of planning scheme maps, please refer to Council’s website: https://www.logan.qld.gov.au/planning-and-development/logan-planning-schemeBy using this information service provided by Logan City Council, you confirm that you agree to the following terms and conditions:- The available planning scheme maps do not replace the PDF maps that are published on the Council’s website, and the PDF maps prevail to the extent of any inconsistency. - This information is subject to change and should not be relied on to make decisions, particularly in regard to property transactions, to value property, or to make any decisions which may have financial or legal implications. - While all reasonable care has been taken in producing the maps, Council does not warrant the accuracy, completeness or currency of this information and accepts no responsibilities for, or in connection with, any expense, loss, damage or liability (including indirect or consequential loss) arising as a result of any inaccuracies, errors or omissions, or your reliance on or use of this information. - The copyright of the information available through this website is owned by or licensed to Council. Council reserves all intellectual property rights in the information and does not confer any intellectual property rights on you or any other person by making the information available.

This File Geodatabase download, (last updated September 25, 2024), contains all the feature classes within the Land and Property Information group. The City of Langley has compiled all the Land and Property Information feature classes into one file geodatabase. Data is updated on a regular basis; however, lot sizes, legal descriptions and encumbrances must be confirmed at the Land Title Office.File Geodatabase Feature Classes:Address (Anno)Address PointsCity BoundaryEasement AnnoEasementsFacilitiesFolioLegal DescriptionsLot LinesParcelsRoad AllowanceSchools