The City Health Dashboard presents city- and/or census tract-level data for over 970 cities across the United States to describe population health within local contexts. Metrics included in the dashboard encompass five broad domains: health outcomes, social and economic factors, health behavior, physical environment, and clinical care.

The underlying data originates from a combination of publicly-available and private sources, including the U.S. Census Bureau, Centers for Disease Control, Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Bureau of Investigation, American Medical Association, ParkServe®, and Walk Score®.

An up-to-date list of all cities in the Dashboard may be found here.

Cities with City Health Dashboard data currently in Chattadata

Philadelphia Council District Health Dashboard - Dataset and Codebook

Description

This dataset supports the Philadelphia Council District Health Dashboard, an interactive web application that visualizes health disparities and social determinants of health across Philadelphia's 10 City Council Districts. The dashboard provides district-level insights to guide equitable policy and investment decisions by City Council members and the public.

Background

Philadelphia residents experience drastically different health outcomes across the city – differences shaped by federal, state, and local policies rather than individual choices alone. This project maps key health indicators across all 10 Philadelphia City Council Districts to show how politics and geography intersect to shape Philadelphian health.

Data Sources

• US Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year estimates (2018-2022)
• Open Data Philly (2015-2024)

Data aggregated from original geographic units to City Council District boundaries using population-weighted methods.

Dataset Contents

Files:

• data_v1.csv - Main dataset containing health indicators by Philadelphia City Council District
• codebook_v1.csv - Complete metadata and variable documentation

Methodology

• Population-weighted aggregation for demographic/socioeconomic variables
• Area-weighted aggregation for environmental variables
• Count aggregation for incident data
• City averages calculated as population-weighted across districts

Geographic Coverage

• Unit: Philadelphia City Council Districts (n=10)
• Period: 2018-2022 (ACS), 2015-2024 (Open Data Philly)

Applications

Supports policy analysis, community advocacy, academic research, and public health planning at the district level.

Contact

Authors

Amber Bolli, Tamara Rushovich, Ran Li, Stephanie Hernandez, Alina Schnake-Mahl

Funding

Transform Academia for Equity grant from Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

Keywords

Philadelphia, City Council, Health Disparities, Social Determinants, Urban Health, Public Policy, Geospatial Analysis

This dashboard shows historic and current data related to this performance measure. The performance measure dashboard is available at 3.34 Community Health and Well-Being. Data Dictionary

Philadelphia Council District Health Dashboard - Dataset and Codebook

Description

This dataset supports the Philadelphia Council District Health Dashboard, an interactive web application that visualizes health disparities and social determinants of health across Philadelphia's 10 City Council Districts. The dashboard provides district-level insights to guide equitable policy and investment decisions by City Council members and the public.

Background

Philadelphia residents experience drastically different health outcomes across the city – differences shaped by federal, state, and local policies rather than individual choices alone. This project maps key health indicators across all 10 Philadelphia City Council Districts to show how politics and geography intersect to shape Philadelphian health.

Data Sources

• US Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year estimates (2018-2022)
• Open Data Philly (2015-2024)

Data aggregated from original geographic units to City Council District boundaries using population-weighted methods.

Dataset Contents

Files:

• data_v1_1.csv - Main dataset containing health indicators by Philadelphia City Council District
• codebook_v1_1.csv - Complete metadata and variable documentation

Methodology

• Population-weighted aggregation for demographic/socioeconomic variables
• Area-weighted aggregation for environmental variables
• Count aggregation for incident data
• City averages calculated as population-weighted across districts

Geographic Coverage

• Unit: Philadelphia City Council Districts (n=10)
• Period: 2018-2022 (ACS), 2015-2024 (Open Data Philly)

Applications

Supports policy analysis, community advocacy, academic research, and public health planning at the district level.

Contact

Authors

Amber Bolli, Tamara Rushovich, Ran Li, Stephanie Hernandez, Alina Schnake-Mahl

Funding

Transform Academia for Equity grant from Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

Keywords

Philadelphia, City Council, Health Disparities, Social Determinants, Urban Health, Public Policy, Geospatial Analysis

Current range of Air Quality Health Index (AQHI) at general and roadside stations provided by Environmental Protection Department.

The dataset combines migration data from Redfin for 132 U.S. cities (2019-2021) with health information from NYU Langone Health's City Health Dashboard.

An application to monitor COVID-19 cases and share City closures information with the public. Used in the GIS@Work Fire Emergency link.

This dataset comes from the Community Survey questions relating to the Community Health & Well-Being performance measure: "With “10” representing the best possible life for you and “0” representing the worst, how would you say you personally feel you stand at this time?" and "With “10” representing the best possible life for you and “0” representing the worst, how do you think you will stand about five years from now?" – the results of both scores are then used to assess a Cantril Scale which is a way of assessing general life satisfaction. As per the Cantril Self-Anchoring Striving Scale the three categories of identification are as follows: Thriving – Respondents rate their current life as a 7 or higher AND their future life as an 8 or higher. Struggling – Respondents either rate their current life moderately (5 or 6) OR rate their future life moderately (5, 6 or 7) or negatively (0 to 4). Suffering – Respondents rate their current life negatively (0 to 4) AND their future life negatively (0 to 4). The survey is mailed to a random sample of households in the City of Tempe and has a 95% confidence level.This page provides data for the Community Health and Well-Being performance measure. The performance measure dashboard is available at 3.34 Community Health and Well-Being. Additional InformationSource: Community Attitude Survey (Vendor: ETC Institute)Contact: Adam SamuelsContact email: adam_samuels@tempe.govPreparation Method: Survey results from two questions are calculated to create a Cantril Scale value that falls into the categories of Thriving, Struggling, and Suffering.Publish Frequency: AnnuallyPublish Method: ManualData Dictionary

This indicator provides information about lead exposure risk for census tracts in Los Angeles County based on self-reported housing and poverty data. Using methods implemented by New York University for the City Health Dashboard, a lead risk index score ranging from 1 to 10 was assigned to each census tract with available data, with a score of 1 indicating the lowest risk and a score of 10 indicating the highest risk for lead exposure.Lead is a heavy metal that has negative impacts on nearly every system in the body, particularly the brain, kidneys, and blood. Although lead paint was phased out in the 1970s, legacy lead paint and dust remain primary sources of lead exposure in the US. Literature on lead poisoning consistently finds two factors to be correlated with lead exposure risk: the age of houses (which predicts the likelihood of lead paint) and poverty. While all people can be affected by lead, young children and pregnant persons are the most vulnerable. Irreversible neurodevelopment effects, including decreased IQ, shortened attention span, and reduced fine motor skills, occur at even low levels of lead exposure. At high levels, anemia, high blood pressure, seizures, and death can occur. There is no known safe level of lead exposure for children.For more information about the Community Health Profiles Data Initiative, please see the initiative homepage.

Data Description: This dataset includes information on the location, hours, care type, services, provided, and insurance accepted for Cincinnati Health Department Health Centers.

Data Creation: Data is provided by the Health Department

Data Created By: Health Department

Refresh Frequency: As needed

CincyInsights: The City of Cincinnati maintains an interactive dashboard portal, CincyInsights in addition to our Open Data in an effort to increase access and usage of city data. This data set has an associated dashboard available here: https://insights.cincinnati-oh.gov/stories/s/tgfw-4wez/

Data Dictionary: A data dictionary providing definitions of columns and attributes is available as an attachment to this dataset.

Processing: The City of Cincinnati is committed to providing the most granular and accurate data possible. In that pursuit the Office of Performance and Data Analytics facilitates standard processing to most raw data prior to publication. Processing includes but is not limited: address verification, geocoding, decoding attributes, and addition of administrative areas (i.e. Census, neighborhoods, police districts, etc.).

Data Usage: For directions on downloading and using open data please visit our How-to Guide: https://data.cincinnati-oh.gov/dataset/Open-Data-How-To-Guide/gdr9-g3ad

Context

Part of Janatahack Hackathon in Analytics Vidhya

Content

The healthcare sector has long been an early adopter of and benefited greatly from technological advances. These days, machine learning plays a key role in many health-related realms, including the development of new medical procedures, the handling of patient data, health camps and records, and the treatment of chronic diseases.

MedCamp organizes health camps in several cities with low work life balance. They reach out to working people and ask them to register for these health camps. For those who attend, MedCamp provides them facility to undergo health checks or increase awareness by visiting various stalls (depending on the format of camp).

MedCamp has conducted 65 such events over a period of 4 years and they see a high drop off between “Registration” and number of people taking tests at the Camps. In last 4 years, they have stored data of ~110,000 registrations they have done.

One of the huge costs in arranging these camps is the amount of inventory you need to carry. If you carry more than required inventory, you incur unnecessarily high costs. On the other hand, if you carry less than required inventory for conducting these medical checks, people end up having bad experience.

The Process:

MedCamp employees / volunteers reach out to people and drive registrations.
During the camp, People who “ShowUp” either undergo the medical tests or visit stalls depending on the format of health camp.

Other things to note:

Since this is a completely voluntary activity for the working professionals, MedCamp usually has little profile information about these people.
For a few camps, there was hardware failure, so some information about date and time of registration is lost.
MedCamp runs 3 formats of these camps. The first and second format provides people with an instantaneous health score. The third format provides  
information about several health issues through various awareness stalls.

Favorable outcome:

For the first 2 formats, a favourable outcome is defined as getting a health_score, while in the third format it is defined as visiting at least a stall.
You need to predict the chances (probability) of having a favourable outcome.

Train / Test split:

Camps started on or before 31st March 2006 are considered in Train
Test data is for all camps conducted on or after 1st April 2006.

Acknowledgements

Credits to AV

Inspiration

To share with the data science community to jump start their journey in Healthcare Analytics

Hub page featuring Sioux Falls Dashboard - Protecting Life - Health - Food Scores Over 90.

This dataset by The COVID Tracking Project at The Atlantic captures the virus’s transmission in 65 cities and counties across the country. Many of these metropolitan areas only report the current day’s totals and remove older data from their public health dashboards so that no historical archive is available. As a result, it’s often impossible to see the impact of the virus on a particular geography over time. Our dataset captures this historical information. It is the only available metropolitan dataset that includes race and ethnicity, which allows us to improve our understanding of how COVID-19 disproportionately affects communities of color.

We have completed our data collection on this project and want to share what we’ve learned from viewing COVID-19 at the local level. Five months in, we’ve seen that local data tells a vastly different story than state-level data. Not only do trends emerge in city and county data before appearing at the state level, but state-level data also o...

Data Description: This dataset contains information on the Cincinnati Health Department's (CHD) Creating Healthy Communities Coalition (CHCC). Creating Health Communities is an Ohio Department of Health (ODH) program. This dataset has the location and estimated number of people impacted by CHCC activities implemented in 2015-2017. For more information, visit https://www.cincinnati-oh.gov/health/cincinnati-health-department-divisions1/environmental-health/health-promotion-worksite-wellness/

Disclaimers: The CHCC dashboard includes data from outside the city limits, including Northern Kentucky, Hamilton County, Columbus area, and Dayton area, for the following measures: UDF Healthy Food Retail, Produce Perks, and Tobacco Free Policies.

A residential population may be impacted by multiple PSE changes, due to the location of various PSE changes. For example, in 2015 the Stanley Rowe Senior Citizens population was impacted by a Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design PSE change. The same population was impacted again in 2016 with a Smoke-free Policy change.

Data Creation: The Cincinnati Health Department provides updates on each CHCC activity impacting Cincinnati residents

Data Created By: Cincinnati Health Department

Refresh Frequency: Daily

CincyInsights: The City of Cincinnati maintains an interactive dashboard portal, CincyInsights in addition to our Open Data in an effort to increase access and usage of city data. This data set has an associated dashboard available here: https://insights.cincinnati-oh.gov/stories/s/5ygy-4y6j

Data Dictionary: A data dictionary providing definitions of columns and attributes is available as an attachment to this dataset.

Processing: The City of Cincinnati is committed to providing the most granular and accurate data possible. In that pursuit the Office of Performance and Data Analytics facilitates standard processing to most raw data prior to publication. Processing includes but is not limited: address verification, geocoding, decoding attributes, and addition of administrative areas (i.e. Census, neighborhoods, police districts, etc.).

Data Usage: For directions on downloading and using open data please visit our How-to Guide: https://data.cincinnati-oh.gov/dataset/Open-Data-How-To-Guide/gdr9-g3ad

Measure and Map Access to Grocery StoresFrom the perspective of the people living in each neighborhoodHow do people in your city get to the grocery store? The answer to that question depends on the person and where they live. This web map helps answer the question in this app.Some live in cities and stop by a grocery store within a short walk or bike ride of home or work. Others live in areas where car ownership is more prevalent, and so they drive to a store. Some do not own a vehicle, and rely on a friend or public transit. Others rely on grocery delivery for their needs. And, many live in rural areas far from town, so a trip to a grocery store is an infrequent event involving a long drive.This map from Esri shows which areas are within a ten minute walk or ten minute drive of a grocery store in the United States and Puerto Rico. Darker color indicates access to more stores. The chart shows how many people can walk to a grocery store if they wanted to or needed to.It is estimated that 20% of U.S. population live within a 10 minute walk of a grocery store, and 92% of the population live within a 10 minute drive of a grocery store.Look up your city to see how the numbers change as you move around the map. Or, draw a neighborhood boundary on the map to get numbers for that area.Every census block is scored with a count of walkable and drivable stores nearby, making this a map suitable for a dashboard for any city, or any of the 50 states, DC and Puerto Rico. Two colorful layers visualize this definition of access, one for walkable access (suitable for looking at a city neighborhood by neighborhood) and one for drivable access (suitable for looking across a city, county, region or state).On the walkable layer, shades of green define areas within a ten minute walk of one or more grocery stores. The colors become more intense and trend to a blue-green color for the busiest neighborhoods, such as downtown San Francisco. As you zoom in, a layer of Census block points visualizes the local population with or without walkable access.As you zoom out to see the entire city, the map adds a light blue - to dark blue layer, showing which parts of the region fall within ten minutes' drive of one or more grocery stores. As a result, the map is useful at all scales, from national to regional, state and local levels. It becomes easier to spot grocery stores that sit within a highly populated area, and grocery stores that sit in a shopping center far away from populated areas. This view of a city begins to hint at the question: how many people have each type of access to grocery stores? And, what if they are unable to walk a mile regularly, or don't own a car?How to Use This MapUse this map to introduce the concepts of access to grocery stores in your city or town. This is the kind of map where people will want to look up their home or work address to validate what the map is saying.The map was built with that use in mind. Many maps of access use straight-line, as-the-crow-flies distance, which ignores real-world barriers to walkability like rivers, lakes, interstates and other characteristics of the built environment. Block analysis using a network data set and Origin-Destination analysis factors these barriers in, resulting in a more realistic depiction of access.There is data behind the map, which can be summarized to show how many people have walkable access to local grocery stores. The map includes a feature layer of population in Census block points, which are visible when you zoom in far enough. This feature layer can be plugged into an app like this one that summarizes the population with/without walkable or drivable access.Lastly, this map can serve as backdrop to other community resources, like food banks, farmers markets (example), and transit (example). Add a transit layer to immediately gauge its impact on the population's grocery access. You can also use this map to see how it relates to communities of concern. Add a layer of any block group or tract demographics, such as Percent Senior Population (examples), or Percent of Households with Access to 0 Vehicles (examples).The map is a useful visual and analytic resource for helping community leaders, business and government leaders see their town from the perspective of its residents, and begin asking questions about how their community could be improved.Data sourcesPopulation data is from the 2010 U.S. Census blocks. Each census block has a count of stores within a 10 minute walk, and a count of stores within a ten minute drive. Census blocks known to be unpopulated are given a score of 0. The layer is available as a hosted feature layer.Grocery store locations are from SafeGraph, reflecting what was in the data as of October 2020. Access to the layer was obtained from the SafeGraph offering in ArcGIS Marketplace. For this project, ArcGIS StreetMap Premium was used for the street network in the origin-destination analysis work, because it already has the necessary attributes on each street segment to identify which streets are considered walkable, and supports a wide variety of driving parameters.The walkable access layer and drivable access layers are rasters, whose colors were chosen to allow the drivable access layer to serve as backdrop to the walkable access layer. Alternative versions of these layers are available. These pairs use different colors but are otherwise identical in content.Data PreparationArcGIS Network Analyst was used to set up a network street layer for analysis. ArcGIS StreetMap Premium was installed to a local hard drive and selected in the Origin-Destination workflow as the network data source. This allows the origins (Census block centroids) and destinations (SafeGraph grocery stores) to be connected to that network, to allow origin-destination analysis.The Census blocks layer contains the centroid of each Census block. The data allows a simple popup to be created. This layer's block figures can be summarized further, to tract, county and state levels.The SafeGraph grocery store locations were created by querying the SafeGraph source layer based on primary NAICS code. After connecting to the layer in ArcGIS Pro, a definition query was set to only show records with NAICS code 445110 as an initial screening. The layer was exported to a local disk drive for further definition query refinement, to eliminate any records that were obviously not grocery stores. The final layer used in the analysis had approximately 53,600 records. In this map, this layer is included as a vector tile layer.MethodologyEvery census block in the U.S. was assigned two access scores, whose numbers are simply how many grocery stores are within a 10 minute walk and a 10 minute drive of that census block. Every census block has a score of 0 (no stores), 1, 2 or more stores. The count of accessible stores was determined using Origin-Destination Analysis in ArcGIS Network Analyst, in ArcGIS Pro. A set of Tools in this ArcGIS Pro package allow a similar analysis to be conducted for any city or other area. The Tools step through the data prep and analysis steps. Download the Pro package, open it and substitute your own layers for Origins and Destinations. Parcel centroids are a suggested option for Origins, for example. Origin-Destination analysis was configured, using ArcGIS StreetMap Premium as the network data source. Census block centroids with population greater than zero were used as the Origins, and grocery store locations were used as the Destinations. A cutoff of 10 minutes was used with the Walk Time option. Only one restriction was applied to the street network: Walkable, which means Interstates and other non-walkable street segments were treated appropriately. You see the results in the map: wherever freeway overpasses and underpasses are present near a grocery store, the walkable area extends across/through that pass, but not along the freeway.A cutoff of 10 minutes was used with the Drive Time option. The default restrictions were applied to the street network, which means a typical vehicle's access to all types of roads was factored in.The results for each analysis were captured in the Lines layer, which shows which origins are within the cutoff of each destination over the street network, given the assumptions about that network (walking, or driving a vehicle).The Lines layer was then summarized by census block ID to capture the Maximum value of the Destination_Rank field. A census block within 10 minutes of 3 stores would have 3 records in the Lines layer, but only one value in the summarized table, with a MAX_Destination_Rank field value of 3. This is the number of stores accessible to that census block in the 10 minutes measured, for walking and driving. These data were joined to the block centroids layer and given unique names. At this point, all blocks with zero population or null values in the MAX_Destination_Rank fields were given a store count of 0, to help the next step.Walkable and Drivable areas are calculated into a raster layer, using Nearest Neighbor geoprocessing tool on the count of stores within a 10 minute walk, and a count of stores within a ten minute drive, respectively. This tool uses a 200 meter grid and interpolates the values between each census block. A census tracts layer containing all water polygons "erased" from the census tract boundaries was used as an environment setting, to help constrain interpolation into/across bodies of water. The same layer use used to "shoreline" the Nearest Neighbor results, to eliminate any interpolation into the ocean or Great Lakes. This helped but was not perfect.Notes and LimitationsThe map provides a baseline for discussing access to grocery stores in a city. It does not presume local population has the desire or means to walk or drive to obtain groceries. It does not take elevation gain or loss into account. It does not factor time of day nor weather, seasons, or other variables that affect a

Analysis of ‘COVID-19 Deaths by Population Characteristics Over Time’ provided by Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai), based on source dataset retrieved from https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/60f5842f-a359-4b03-ad21-1bcfc3bf7fe6 on 13 February 2022.

--- Dataset description provided by original source is as follows ---

Note: On January 22, 2022, system updates to improve the timeliness and accuracy of San Francisco COVID-19 cases and deaths data were implemented. You might see some fluctuations in historic data as a result of this change.

A. SUMMARY This dataset shows San Francisco COVID-19 deaths by population characteristics and by date. Deaths are included on the date the individual died.

Population characteristics are subgroups, or demographic cross-sections, like age, race, or gender. The City tracks how deaths have been distributed among different subgroups. This information can reveal trends and disparities among groups.

Data is lagged by five days, meaning the most date included is 5 days prior to today. All data update daily as more information becomes available.

B. HOW THE DATASET IS CREATED COVID-19 deaths are suspected to be associated with COVID-19. This means COVID-19 is listed as a cause of death or significant condition on the death certificate.

Data on the population characteristics of COVID-19 deaths are from: * Case interviews * Laboratories * Medical providers

These multiple streams of data are merged, deduplicated, and undergo data verification processes. It takes time to process this data. Because of this, data is lagged by 5 days and death totals for previous days may increase or decrease. More recent data is less reliable.

Data are continually updated to maximize completeness of information and reporting on San Francisco COVID-19 deaths.

Data notes on each population characteristic type is listed below.

Race/ethnicity * We include all race/ethnicity categories that are collected for COVID-19 cases.

Sexual orientation * Sexual orientation data is collected from individuals who are 18 years old or older. These individuals can choose whether to provide this information during case interviews. Learn more about our data collection guidelines. * The City began asking for this information on April 28, 2020. Gender * The City collects information on gender identity using these guidelines.

Comorbidities * Underlying conditions are reported when a person has one or more underlying health conditions at the time of diagnosis or death.

Transmission type * Information on transmission of COVID-19 is based on case interviews with individuals who have a confirmed positive test. Individuals are asked if they have been in close contact with a known COVID-19 case. If they answer yes, transmission category is recorded as contact with a known case. If they report no contact with a known case, transmission category is recorded as community transmission. If the case is not interviewed or was not asked the question, they are counted as unknown.

Homelessness Persons are identified as homeless based on several data sources: * self-reported living situation
* the location at the time of testing * Department of Public Health homelessness and health databases * Residents in Single-Room Occupancy hotels are not included in these figures.
These methods serve as an estimate of persons experiencing homelessness. They may not meet other homelessness definitions.

Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) occupancy * A Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) is a type of long-term care facility that provides care to individuals, generally in their 60s and older, who need functional assistance in their daily lives. * Facilities are mandated to report COVID-19 cases or deaths among their residents. The City follows up with these facilities to confirm.
* There may be differences between the City’s SNF data and the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) dashboard. The difference may be because the City and the State use dif

--- Original source retains full ownership of the source dataset ---

THIS DATA HAS BEEN REPLACED BY DIFFERENT FEATURE SERVICESTHE LAST DATE OF ENTRY WAS 8/23/2020THE DATA REPLACING THIS DATA CAN BE FOUND:SAMHD Daily Surveillance Data PublicSAMHD COVID-19 Weekly Data PublicCOVID19 Weekly Lab Testing Public------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------This data set contains data used to produce the public CoVID-19 Surveillance Dashboard and describes a variety of indicators of the CoVID-19 situation in the City of San Antonio and Bexar County. Each field is updated daily since the first date the data element appeared live in the Dashboard. The Surveillance Dashboard is live and available here.This data reflects information provided by the City of San Antonio Metro Health Department, and is released daily at 7PM on the City of San Antonio CoVID-19 website.

This Power BI dashboard shows the COVID-19 vaccination rate by key demographics including age groups, race and ethnicity, and sex for Tempe zip codes.Data Source: Maricopa County GIS Open Data weekly count of COVID-19 vaccinations. The data were reformatted from the source data to accommodate dashboard configuration. The Maricopa County Department of Public Health (MCDPH) releases the COVID-19 vaccination data for each zip code and city in Maricopa County at ~12:00 PM weekly on Wednesdays via the Maricopa County GIS Open Data website (https://data-maricopa.opendata.arcgis.com/). More information about the data is available on the Maricopa County COVID-19 Vaccine Data page (https://www.maricopa.gov/5671/Public-Vaccine-Data#dashboard). The dashboard’s values are refreshed at 3:00 PM weekly on Wednesdays. The most recent date included on the dashboard is available by hovering over the last point on the right-hand side of each chart. Please note that the times when the Maricopa County Department of Public Health (MCDPH) releases weekly data for COVID-19 vaccines may vary. If data are not released by the time of the scheduled dashboard refresh, the values may appear on the dashboard with the next data release, which may be one or more days after the last scheduled release.Dates: Updated data shows publishing dates which represents values from the previous calendar week (Sunday through Saturday). For more details on data reporting, please see the Maricopa County COVID-19 data reporting notes at https://www.maricopa.gov/5460/Coronavirus-Disease-2019.

Detroit-specific ZIP code populations, along with their cumulative COVID case counts, deaths, and rates. Data provided by Detroit Health Department. The public-facing COVID Cases Dashboard is hosted at: detroitmi.gov/healthUPDATE* July 29 2021:The underlying calculation for disease date was updated to allow for individuals to appear on the curve in multiple locations if they experienced more than one case of COVID-19 that was at least 90 days apart.Geospatial information analysis was also improved and additional criterial for address clean up were implemented, which leads to more accurate case counts within Zip Codes. Some unverified addresses that may have appeared in previous Zip Code counts are now excluded.This change discourages direct comparison of dashboard visualizations and counts prior to the new calculation, and non-significant shifts in numbers will be noticed.Case numbers represent Detroit residents only. Some ZIP codes with very low case counts are excluded to protect privacy. Case counts are totals per ZIP code and are not adjusted for population. ZIP code totals are preliminary; addresses are updated as new information becomes available and counts are subject to change. Not all cases have an accurate location; only cases with a known ZIP code are represented. Where a ZIP code is split between cities, only the Detroit portion is shown (48203, 48211, 48212, 48236, 48239). The counts exclude cases among prisoners at the Wayne County Jail and known hospital or laboratory locations.ZIP_Code: The USPS ZIP postal code Clipped_ZIP_Population: The 2010 population of the ZIP code, clipped to include Detroit City residents only.ZIP_Case_Count: The current cumulative count of Confirmed COVID cases within the ZIP code, since the beginning of the pandemic. (Have a "Confimed" case status in MDSS)ZIP_Death_Count: The current cumulative count of Confirmed COVID cases within the ZIP code, since the beginning of the pandemic. (Have a "Confimed" case status in MDSS and are deceased)ZIP_Case_Rate: Rate of confirmed cases per 100 thousand residents in the ZIP code. For each zip, the rate was calculated by (C/P)*100000 C = the count of confirmed (MDSS case status = Confirmed) cases with a resident address in the ZIP code P = the population count of the ZIP codeZIP_Death_Rate: Rate of confirmed cases that were marked deceased, per 100 thousand residents in the ZIP code. For each zip, the rate was calculated by (D/P)*100000 D = the count of confirmed (MDSS case status = Confirmed) cases marked as deceased, with a resident address in the ZIP P = the population count of the ZIP code