This feature class represents the boundaries of the City of Austin Neighborhood Planning Areas (NPA). The status of these areas, as directed by City Council, can either be plan approved, planning underway/set to begin, future planning area, or non-neighborhood planning area. Future planning area boundaries may change before they are set by the City Council to begin. See https://www.austintexas.gov/department/planning-and-zoning/plans for more information. Terms of Use This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey and represents only the approximate relative location of property boundaries. This product has been produced by the City of Austin for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness.

City of Austin Open Data Terms of Use https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/ranj-cccq

This dataset is a monthly upload of the Community Registry (www.AustinTexas.gov/CR), where community organizations such as neighborhood associations may register with the City of Austin to receive notices of land development permit applications within 500 feet of the organization's specified boundaries. This dataset can be used to contact multiple registered organizations at once by filtering/sorting, for example, by Association Type or by Association ZipCode. The organizations' boundaries can be viewed in the City's interactive map at www.AustinTexas.gov/GIS/PropertyProfile/ - the Community Registry layer is under the Boundaries/Grids folder.

It depicts where different types of development should occur. This GIS is an aggregation of the GIS layers for each FLUM, and does not serve as an official FLUM's that can be viewed at http://www.austintexas.gov/page/adopted-neighborhood-planning-areas-0. Official FLUM's may contain City Council adopted notations and information that is not contained in this GIS. The Hyde Park and Old West Austin Neighborhood Planning Areas do not have a City Council Approved Future Land Use Map. http://www.austintexas.gov/sites/default/files/files/Planning/Neighborhood_Planning/land_use_policy_guide.pdf contains more information on the land use codes used in the FLUM's. This layer also contains information on the parcel-based Infill Options. It does not show all infill options. More information on these can be obtained at http://www.austintexas.gov/department/neighborhood-planning-resources.

City of Austin Open Data Terms of Use https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/ranj-cccq The City of Austin’s Community Tree Priority Map (formerly Planting Prioritization) serves as a decision support tool to determine where to focus forestry activities in Austin, Texas. This map shows U.S. Census tracts (2010) containing tabular data related to community forestry priorities determined by the Community Tree Preservation Division’s Urban Forest Program. Prioritization is determined through the priority score. This score combines nine measures normalized and summarized into four broad categories. The score is aggregated at the neighborhood (U.S. Census tract) level. Scores can range from 0 to 100 with higher scores meaning a higher need for community forestry activities to achieve more equitable canopy distribution. Finally, the priority level provides a categorical representation of the data for a simplified view. Priority Score = ( Σ Natural Environment + Σ Social Vulnerability + Σ Community Investment + Σ Health & Well-Being ) / 4 This map was updated in 2020. Minor updates are made as-needed with a review and data update scheduled for 2025 (every 5 years). Ultimately, this map is used to aggregate Urban Forest Grant/Portal projects and tree planting/distribution data to assess program performance. This dataset is intended to be downloaded as a GIS Shapefile but may also be viewed in Excel. It's also available in ArcGIS Online at https://austin.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=7d7c5260e60c4f8ab811d2c5fda6c40f

City of Austin Neighborhood Reporting Areas

description: Shows the acreage of "general" zoning categories in each neigborhood reporting area. Neigborhood reporting areas are a combination of official and unofficial boundaries for the purpose of collecting and reporting information (data) in Austin. They are comprised of Neighborhood Planning Areas (in the central core) which are approved and can only be changed by City Council. Areas outside of neighborhood planning areas were drawn using logical boundaries such as roadways, and covering larger areas encompassing several neighborhoods. A Neighborhood Reporting Area map is available at http://www.austintexas.gov/sites/default/files/files/Planning/Demographics/Neighborhood_Reporting_Areas.pdf. The zoning data does not indicate public right-of-way (ROW) areas, such as streets and railroad ROW's, which are not typically zoned. General zoning includes major base zone district categories plus zones with vertical and mixed use overlays. Zoning maps are available at http://austintexas.gov/page/planning-maps, and http://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=6803413bed5e4aa0bb13c93c71ccb41d. More information on zoning is available at http://www.austintexas.gov/department/zoning. This information is taken from the zoning layer https://data.austintexas.gov/Geodata/Zoning/5rzy-nm5e; abstract: Shows the acreage of "general" zoning categories in each neigborhood reporting area. Neigborhood reporting areas are a combination of official and unofficial boundaries for the purpose of collecting and reporting information (data) in Austin. They are comprised of Neighborhood Planning Areas (in the central core) which are approved and can only be changed by City Council. Areas outside of neighborhood planning areas were drawn using logical boundaries such as roadways, and covering larger areas encompassing several neighborhoods. A Neighborhood Reporting Area map is available at http://www.austintexas.gov/sites/default/files/files/Planning/Demographics/Neighborhood_Reporting_Areas.pdf. The zoning data does not indicate public right-of-way (ROW) areas, such as streets and railroad ROW's, which are not typically zoned. General zoning includes major base zone district categories plus zones with vertical and mixed use overlays. Zoning maps are available at http://austintexas.gov/page/planning-maps, and http://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=6803413bed5e4aa0bb13c93c71ccb41d. More information on zoning is available at http://www.austintexas.gov/department/zoning. This information is taken from the zoning layer https://data.austintexas.gov/Geodata/Zoning/5rzy-nm5e

Date of Publication: 07/21/2021Name of Person Responsible: Alan HalterDate to be removed/updated: Ongoing updates. Last updated on 10/61/2021.This map includes the variables used to calculate Tree Equity Scores for Austin, Texas. For more information, contact the original data author, American Forests. Layer colors are HEX F99D3E (orange) to 6CC396 (green).A Tree Equity Score is a metric that helps cities assess how well they are delivering equitable tree canopy cover to all residents. The score combines measures of tree canopy cover need and priority for trees in urban neighborhoods (defined as Census Block Groups). It is derived from tree canopy cover, climate, demographic and socioeconomic data. Geographies represent selected Census blockgroups for Caldwell, Hays, Travis, and Williamson counties. They cover the Census "urbanized area" for Austin and might not represent the full City of Austin jurisdiction.The score is calculated at the neighborhood (block group) level.Methodology (For more information about methodology, visit https://treeequityscore.org/methodology/ )Step 1: A Neighborhood GoalDensity Adjusted Canopy TargetThe canopy target – which is meant to be equitable, aspirational and achievable – requires the following data:Tree canopy cover. High resolution tree canopy where available, the National Land Cover Database where it is not.Census American Community Survey (ACS) 2018 5-year Block Group population estimatesCensus ACS 2018 5-year city and block group Median Income estimatesTo identify a baseline canopy target, we use generalized natural biome baseline targets selected in conjunction with the USDA Forest Service. We select the baseline target based on the location of the municipality.Forest: 40%Grassland: 20%Desert: 15%This target is then adjusted based on population density to estimate a neighborhood goal. Based on research completed by The Nature Conservancy, adjustments are made using the following table:Adjusting for population density makes for more achievable targets, while recognizing differences in plantable areas suitable for tree canopy. Note: Neighborhood goals are capped at 150% of the natural biome baseline target.The formula for each neighborhood goal, GOAL, is as follows:GOAL = Baseline target * Density adjustment factorStep 2: The Canopy GapThe neighborhood canopy gap, GAP, is calculated by subtracting the existing neighborhood canopy from the density adjusted target, that is: GAP = GOAL – EC, where EC is % existing canopy for that neighborhoodThe canopy Gap is then normalized to a score from 0-100.GAPScore = 100 * GAP / GAPmax , where:GAPmax is the maximum GAP value citywide for that indicator; andNotes: If the GAP is negative (i.e. Existing canopy is greater than the neighborhood goal), it is adjusted to 0 before normalizing to create the gap score. Also, if Gapmax = 0, then GapScore is set to 0 as well.Step 3: The Priority IndexThe Priority Index is developed to help prioritize the need for planting to achieve Tree Equity. The priority index includes the following equally-weighted characteristics:Income: Percentage of population below 200% of povertyEmployment: Unemployment rateRace: Percentage of people who are not white non-HispanicAge: Ratio of seniors and children to working-age adultsClimate: Urban Heat Island severityHealth: Prevalence of poor mental, physical, respiratory, and cardiac health (composite index)These measures are normalized and combined to create a simple priority index from 0 to 1, where 1 indicates a greater amount of inequity. The indices, N, are calculated as follows:Ni = (xi - xi,min ) / (xi,max - xi,min) , where, for each indicator, Ni,xi is the value for that neighborhood for that indicator, i;xi,max is the maximum value citywide for that indicator, i; andxi,min is the minimum value citywide for that indicator, i.The Priority index, E, is then calculated as follows: E = (N1 + N2 + N3 + N4 + N5 + N6) / 6 , where Ni refers to each indicator value (income, employment, race, age, or climate)Step 4: Tree Equity ScoreTree Equity Score, TES, is calculated by multiplying the Baseline Gap Score by the Priority Index, simply:TES = 100 (1 - GAPScore E)A lower Tree Equity Score indicates a greater priority for closing the tree canopy gap.Tree equity scores of 100 indicate tree equity has been achieved.Data Dictionarygeoid: the blockgroup idtotal_pop: the total population of the block groupstate: the state the blockgroup is incounty: the county the blockgroup is inpctpov: the percent of people in poverty inside the blockgrouppctpoc: the percent of people of color inside the block groupunemplrate: the unemployment rate inside of the block groupmedhhinc: the median household income of the block groupdep_ratio: the dependency ratio (childrens + seniors / 18-64 adults)child_perc: the percent of children inside of the blockgroupseniorperc: the percent of seniors inside of the blockgrouparea: the area of the blockgroup in square kilometerssource: the source of the tree canopy of the block groupavg_temp: the average temperature of the blockgroup on a hot summer's dayua_name: the urbanized area the block group is located insideincorpname: the incorporated place the block group is located insidecongressio: the congressional district of the block groupbgpopdense: the density of the blockgroup (total population over area)popadjust: the population adjustment factor (based on the population density)biome: the biome of the blockgroupbaselinecanopy: baseline tree canopy target generalized to natural biome (percent)treecanopy: the tree canopy percentage of the blockgroup (set to negative 1 if the source is 'ED')tc_gap: the tree canopy gap of the block group (goal minus canopy)tc_goal: the tree canopy goal of the block group (set to negative 1 if the source is 'ED')phys_hlth: the self reported physical health challenges of the people in the block group (a percentage)ment_hlth: the self reported mental health challenges of people in the block group (a percentage)asthma: the self reported asthma challenges of people in the block group (a percentage)core_m: the self reported male coronary heart challenges of people in the block group (a percentage)core_w: the self reported female coronary heart challenges of people in the block group (a percentage)core_norm: the normalized total coronary challenges of people in the block grouphealthnorm: the normalized health index of the block grouppriority: the priority index of the block grouptes: the tree equity score of the block grouptesctyscor: the tree equity score of the incorporated place/municipality of the block group

As the local history division of the Austin Public Library, the Austin History Center provides the public with information about the history, current events, and activities of Austin and Travis County. We collect and preserve information about local governments, businesses, residents, institutions, and neighborhoods so that generations to come will have access to our history. The award-winning Austin Public Library (APL) has been the community’s premier source of knowledge, technology, and inspiration for nearly a century. It provides library programs, technology, collections, and space through its state-of-the-art Central Library, Austin History Center, and 20 library branches. It also provides services and resources out in the community through outreach and partnerships.

This 2013 dataset includes information at the block group-level for the 5-county Austin metro area. Economic, educational, housing, mobility, and environmental indicators are calculated for each block group to provide a comprehensive opportunity index score. This score reflects "opportunity" in the area, defined as a situation or condition that places individuals in a position to be more likely to succeed or excel. This data was collected and calculated by the Kirwan Institute, with collaboration from Green Doors and various community partners, and is compiled in "Geography of Opportunity in Austin" (http://www.greendoors.org/programs/docs/Geography-of-Opportunity-Austin-2013.pdf#page=43). The data can be viewed in an interactive map form here: http://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=5db08646b03547abab85aec0a3592fb7. The data is also available in shapefile format for use in ESRI GIS mapping applications here: https://data.austintexas.gov/Neighborhood/Kirwin-Opportunity-Map/3ns6-m3cy.

This map shows the relative locations of historic districts, contributing properties, and historic landmarks in Austin. Updated: 12-10-2020This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, and/or surveying purposes. It represents only the approximate relative location of property boundaries based on external datasets provided by the Travis Central Appraisal District. Historic resource inventory data and associated recommendations are based on information collected by a consultant, neighborhood group, or individual surveyor as part of a National Register nomination, local historic district nomination, Council-approved area survey, or reconnaissance-level survey. This map has been produced by Planning and Zoning for the sole purpose of geographic reference; no warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness.

Map of the available data for gas pipelines greater than 8 inches contained within or passing through the City of Austin Extra Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) circa 2010. Data source: Texas Railroad Commission. This map has not been updated since 2011. Please visit the Texas Railroad Commission website for current data.

Date of Publication: 2015Name of Person Responsible: Alan HalterDate to be removed/updated: Updated every 5 years. Last updated on 11/24/2020.This map shows U.S. Census tracts (2010) containing tabular data related to community forestry priorities determined by the Community Tree Preservation Division’s Urban Forest Program. Prioritization is determined through the attribute field, “PRIORITY_SCORE_2020” aka the “Priority Score.” This score combines nine measures normalized and summarized into four broad categories outlined below. The score is aggregated at the neighborhood (U.S. Census tract) level. Scores can range from 0 to 100 with higher scores meaning a higher need for community forestry activities to achieve more equitable canopy distribution.Layers in this map:Community Tree Priorities 2020 - the most recent Community Tree Priorities layer for 2020 (formerly Planting Prioritization). Colors in red are areas we want to see more tree planting happen.Community Tree Priorities 2015 - the Community Tree Priorities layer for 2015 (formerly Planting Prioritization). This is a deprecated layer and is for historical reference only.City Funded Tree Planting (last 3 years) - address locations where trees were distributed through the NeighborWoods, Ready Set Plant, and Austin Community Trees programs. Data are filtered to show only the last three years of distribution.Zipcodes - zipcode boundaries for reference.An additional gray layer is added to mask areas outside the City of Austin's city limits.

Shapefile of the City of Austin's neighborhood reporting areas showing equitability of parks across the city. Information includes median income, median income divided by the poverty guideline for a family of four (giving a ratio over poverty line), acres of park within ten-minute walking distance (1/3 mile from hexagon boundary), and household poverty rate normalized by number of households within each polygon.

City of Austin Open Data Terms of Use https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/ranj-cccq This dataset was created to depict approximate tree canopy cover for all land within the City of Austin's "full watershed regulation area." Intended for planning purposes and measuring citywide percent canopy. Definition: Tree canopy is defined as the layer of leaves, branches, and stems of trees that cover the ground when viewed from above. Methods: The 2022 tree canopy layer was derived from satellite imagery (Maxar) and aerial imagery (NAIP). Images were used to extract tree canopy into GIS vector features. First, a “visual recognition engine” generated the vector features. The engine used machine learning algorithms to detect and label image pixels as tree canopy. Then using prior knowledge of feature geometries, more modeling algorithms were used to predict and transform probability maps of labeled pixels into finished vector polygons depicting tree canopy. The resulting features were reviewed and edited through manual interpretation by GIS professionals. When appropriate, NAIP 2022 aerial imagery supplemented satellite images that had cloud cover, and a manual editing process made sure tree canopy represented 2022 conditions. Finally, an independent accuracy assessment was performed by the City of Austin and the Texas A&M Forest Service for quality assurance. GIS professionals assessed agreement between the tree canopy data and its source satellite imagery. An overall accuracy of 98% was found. Only 23 errors were found out of a total 1,000 locations reviewed. These were mostly omission errors (e.g. not including canopy in this dataset when canopy is shown in the satellite or aerial image). Best efforts were made to ensure ground-truth locations contained a tree on the ground. To ensure this, location data were used from City of Austin and Texas A&M Forest Service databases. Analysis: The City of Austin measures tree canopy using the calculation: acres of tree canopy divided by acres of land. The area of interest for the land acres is evaluated at the City of Austin's jurisdiction including Full Purpose, Limited Purpose, and Extraterritorial jurisdictions as of May 2023. New data show, in 2022, tree canopy covered 41% of the total land area within Austin's city limits (using city limit boundaries May 2023 and included in the download as layer name "city_of_austin_2023"). 160,046.50 canopy acres (2022) / 395,037.53 land acres = 40.51% ~41%. This compares to 36% last measured in 2018, and a historical average that’s also hovered around 36%. The time period between 2018 and 2022 saw a 5 percentage point change resulting in over 19K acres of canopy gained (estimated). Data Disclaimer: It's possible changes in percent canopy over the years is due to annexation and improved data methods (e.g. higher resolution imagery, AI, software used, etc.) in addition to actual in changes in tree canopy cover on the ground. For planning purposes only. Dataset does not account for individual trees, tree species nor any metric for tree canopy height. Tree canopy data is provided in vector GIS format housed in a Geodatabase. Download and unzip the folder to get started. Please note, errors may exist in this dataset due to the variation in species composition and land use found across the study area. This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey and represents only the approximate relative location of property boundaries. This product has been produced by the City of Austin for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness. Data Provider: Ecopia AI Tech Corporation and PlanIT Geo, Inc. Data derived from Maxar Technologies, Inc. and USDA NAIP imagery

The 'Area of Interest' feature layer represents the defined geographic boundary used in the Resilience CASPER 2023 survey and StoryMap. This layer outlines the designated survey area for the Community Assessment for Public Health Emergency Response (CASPER), which was conducted in the Eastern Crescent during the spring of 2023. The CASPER methodology is a rapid needs assessment tool designed to evaluate community resilience, preparedness, and response capabilities in the face of public health emergencies and disasters.This feature layer includes 15 zip codes—78757, 78752, 78753, 78754, 78723, 78724, 78721, 78742, 78744, 78725, 78719, 78758, 78702, 78741, and 78617—carefully selected to align with census blocks and geographic divisions within the ESRI Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Community Health Assessment tool. The defined boundary was established to ensure consistency in spatial analysis, facilitate accurate data collection, and support public health decision-making.By visualizing the survey area within this feature layer, the Resilience CASPER 2023 StoryMap provides an interactive representation of the communities assessed, allowing public health officials, emergency planners, and stakeholders to analyze key findings, identify trends, and enhance preparedness efforts. This dataset plays a crucial role in understanding vulnerabilities, guiding resource allocation, and strengthening emergency response strategies for future public health challenges.The Texas Public Information Act gives you the right to access all government records, except where certain exceptions apply. The public information officer may not ask you why you want the records. Request public records online: https://www.austintexas.gov/PIRLearn more about ArcGIS Online Feature Layers https://doc.arcgis.com/en/arcgis-online/reference/feature-layers.htm

Select demographics and land use for the East Riverside - Oltorf neighborhood planning area

Community Connections Program: 100 Gigabit Speed (Google Fiber) Public Facilities administered through the City's Office of Telecom & Regulatory Affairs (TARA) and Google Fiber.

The Home Owners' Loan Corporation (HOLC) was created in the New Deal Era and trained many home appraisers in the 1930s. The HOLC created a neighborhood ranking system infamously known today as redlining. Local real estate developers and appraisers in over 200 cities assigned grades to residential neighborhoods. These maps and neighborhood ratings set the rules for decades of real estate practices. The grades ranged from A to D. A was traditionally colored in green, B was traditionally colored in blue, C was traditionally colored in yellow, and D was traditionally colored in red. A (Best): Always upper- or upper-middle-class White neighborhoods that HOLC defined as posing minimal risk for banks and other mortgage lenders, as they were "ethnically homogeneous" and had room to be further developed.B (Still Desirable): Generally nearly or completely White, U.S. -born neighborhoods that HOLC defined as "still desirable" and sound investments for mortgage lenders.C (Declining): Areas where the residents were often working-class and/or first or second generation immigrants from Europe. These areas often lacked utilities and were characterized by older building stock.D (Hazardous): Areas here often received this grade because they were "infiltrated" with "undesirable populations" such as Jewish, Asian, Mexican, and Black families. These areas were more likely to be close to industrial areas and to have older housing.Banks received federal backing to lend money for mortgages based on these grades. Many banks simply refused to lend to areas with the lowest grade, making it impossible for people in many areas to become homeowners. While this type of neighborhood classification is no longer legal thanks to the Fair Housing Act of 1968 (which was passed in large part due to the activism and work of the NAACP and other groups), the effects of disinvestment due to redlining are still observable today. For example, the health and wealth of neighborhoods in Chicago today can be traced back to redlining (Chicago Tribune). In addition to formerly redlined neighborhoods having fewer resources such as quality schools, access to fresh foods, and health care facilities, new research from the Science Museum of Virginia finds a link between urban heat islands and redlining (Hoffman, et al., 2020). This layer comes out of that work, specifically from University of Richmond's Digital Scholarship Lab. More information on sources and digitization process can be found on the Data and Download and About pages. NOTE: This map has been updated as of 1/16/24 to use a newer version of the data layer which contains more cities than it previously did. As mentioned above, over 200 cities were redlined and therefore this is not a complete dataset of every city that experienced redlining by the HOLC in the 1930s. Map opens in Sacramento, CA. Use bookmarks or the search bar to get to other cities.Cities included in this mapAlabama: Birmingham, Mobile, MontgomeryArizona: PhoenixArkansas: Arkadelphia, Batesville, Camden, Conway, El Dorado, Fort Smith, Little Rock, Russellville, TexarkanaCalifornia: Fresno, Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento, San Diego, San Francisco, San Jose, StocktonColorado: Boulder, Colorado Springs, Denver, Fort Collins, Fort Morgan, Grand Junction, Greeley, Longmont, PuebloConnecticut: Bridgeport and Fairfield; Hartford; New Britain; New Haven; Stamford, Darien, and New Canaan; WaterburyFlorida: Crestview, Daytona Beach, DeFuniak Springs, DeLand, Jacksonville, Miami, New Smyrna, Orlando, Pensacola, St. Petersburg, TampaGeorgia: Atlanta, Augusta, Columbus, Macon, SavannahIowa: Boone, Cedar Rapids, Council Bluffs, Davenport, Des Moines, Dubuque, Sioux City, WaterlooIllinois: Aurora, Chicago, Decatur, East St. Louis, Joliet, Peoria, Rockford, SpringfieldIndiana: Evansville, Fort Wayne, Indianapolis, Lake County Gary, Muncie, South Bend, Terre HauteKansas: Atchison, Greater Kansas City, Junction City, Topeka, WichitaKentucky: Covington, Lexington, LouisvilleLouisiana: New Orleans, ShreveportMaine: Augusta, Boothbay, Portland, Sanford, WatervilleMaryland: BaltimoreMassachusetts: Arlington, Belmont, Boston, Braintree, Brockton, Brookline, Cambridge, Chelsea, Dedham, Everett, Fall River, Fitchburg, Haverhill, Holyoke Chicopee, Lawrence, Lexington, Lowell, Lynn, Malden, Medford, Melrose, Milton, Needham, New Bedford, Newton, Pittsfield, Quincy, Revere, Salem, Saugus, Somerville, Springfield, Waltham, Watertown, Winchester, Winthrop, WorcesterMichigan: Battle Creek, Bay City, Detroit, Flint, Grand Rapids, Jackson, Kalamazoo, Lansing, Muskegon, Pontiac, Saginaw, ToledoMinnesota: Austin, Duluth, Mankato, Minneapolis, Rochester, Staples, St. Cloud, St. PaulMississippi: JacksonMissouri: Cape Girardeau, Carthage, Greater Kansas City, Joplin, Springfield, St. Joseph, St. LouisNorth Carolina: Asheville, Charlotte, Durham, Elizabeth City, Fayetteville, Goldsboro, Greensboro, Hendersonville, High Point, New Bern, Rocky Mount, Statesville, Winston-SalemNorth Dakota: Fargo, Grand Forks, Minot, WillistonNebraska: Lincoln, OmahaNew Hampshire: ManchesterNew Jersey: Atlantic City, Bergen County, Camden, Essex County, Monmouth, Passaic County, Perth Amboy, Trenton, Union CountyNew York: Albany, Binghamton/Johnson City, Bronx, Brooklyn, Buffalo, Elmira, Jamestown, Lower Westchester County, Manhattan, Niagara Falls, Poughkeepsie, Queens, Rochester, Schenectady, Staten Island, Syracuse, Troy, UticaOhio: Akron, Canton, Cleveland, Columbus, Dayton, Hamilton, Lima, Lorain, Portsmouth, Springfield, Toledo, Warren, YoungstownOklahoma: Ada, Alva, Enid, Miami Ottawa County, Muskogee, Norman, Oklahoma City, South McAlester, TulsaOregon: PortlandPennsylvania: Allentown, Altoona, Bethlehem, Chester, Erie, Harrisburg, Johnstown, Lancaster, McKeesport, New Castle, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Wilkes-Barre, YorkRhode Island: Pawtucket & Central Falls, Providence, WoonsocketSouth Carolina: Aiken, Charleston, Columbia, Greater Anderson, Greater Greensville, Orangeburg, Rock Hill, Spartanburg, SumterSouth Dakota: Aberdeen, Huron, Milbank, Mitchell, Rapid City, Sioux Falls, Vermillion, WatertownTennessee: Chattanooga, Elizabethton, Erwin, Greenville, Johnson City, Knoxville, Memphis, NashvilleTexas: Amarillo, Austin, Beaumont, Dallas, El Paso, Forth Worth, Galveston, Houston, Port Arthur, San Antonio, Waco, Wichita FallsUtah: Ogden, Salt Lake CityVirginia: Bristol, Danville, Harrisonburg, Lynchburg, Newport News, Norfolk, Petersburg, Phoebus, Richmond, Roanoke, StauntonVermont: Bennington, Brattleboro, Burlington, Montpelier, Newport City, Poultney, Rutland, Springfield, St. Albans, St. Johnsbury, WindsorWashington: Seattle, Spokane, TacomaWisconsin: Kenosha, Madison, Milwaukee County, Oshkosh, RacineWest Virginia: Charleston, Huntington, WheelingAn example of a map produced by the HOLC of Philadelphia:

A census tract is a geographic area defined by the U.S. Census Bureau for the purpose of collecting and analyzing demographic data. Typically, a census tract contains a population of about 1,200 to 8,000 people and is designed to reflect homogenous social and economic characteristics. Tracts are used in various statistical analyses and are updated every ten years with the decennial census, allowing for a detailed understanding of population trends, housing, and economic conditions within specific communities. These files do not include demographic data, but they contain geographic entity codes that can be linked to the Census Bureau’s demographic data, available on https://data.census.gov. Terms of Use This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey and represents only the approximate relative location of property boundaries. This product has been produced by the US Census for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness.

Watershed Youth Education team tracks the schools that a program is provided to and the programs provided at the school.