Facebook
TwitterCity of Pittsburgh Boundary based on 2020 Census Data. This includes Mt. Oliver Borough which is not a part of Pittsburgh but is included since it is fully enclosed by Pittsburgh. This also includes rivers within Pittsburgh. This is considered current as of August 2023.
Facebook
TwitterPittsburgh City Boundary
Facebook
TwitterHistoric Boundaries for City of Pittsburgh City Council Districts For more recent and current council district boundaries, see https://data.wprdc.org/dataset/resources/city-council-districts-2012
Facebook
TwitterThis dataset demarcates the municipal boundaries in Allegheny County. Data was created to portray the boundaries of the 130 Municipalities in Allegheny County the attribute table includes additional descriptive information including Councils of Government (COG) affiliation (regional governing and coordinating bodies comprised of several bordering municipalities), School District, Congressional District, FIPS and County Municipal Code and County Council District.
If viewing this description on the Western Pennsylvania Regional Data Center’s open data portal (http://www.wprdc.org), this dataset is harvested on a weekly basis from Allegheny County’s GIS data portal (http://openac.alcogis.opendata.arcgis.com/). The full metadata record for this dataset can also be found on Allegheny County’s GIS portal. You can access the metadata record and other resources on the GIS portal by clicking on the “Explore” button (and choosing the “Go to resource” option) to the right of the “ArcGIS Open Dataset” text below.
Category: Civic Vitality and Governance
Organization: Allegheny County
Department: Geographic Information Systems Group; Department of Administrative Services
Temporal Coverage: current
Data Notes:
Coordinate System: Pennsylvania State Plane South Zone 3702; U.S. Survey Foot
Development Notes: none
Other: none
Related Document(s): Data Dictionary (none)
Frequency - Data Change: As needed
Frequency - Publishing: As needed
Data Steward Name: Eli Thomas
Data Steward Email: gishelp@alleghenycounty.us
Facebook
TwitterCC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
Boundaries for Pittsburgh City Council
Facebook
TwitterThis data shows the attendance boundaries used to assign students to feeder pattern schools based on their place of residence. These boundaries were adopted for the 2012-13 school year by the Pittsburgh Public Schools. The boundaries were drawn to align with major roads, neighborhood boundaries, and natural features. Efforts were also made to enable all students within an elementary school to move to the same middle school, and allow all students in a middle school to transition to the same high school.
Facebook
TwitterMIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
License information was derived automatically
This Polygon Feature Class is of the City of Kingston former Municipal Boundary. The boundaries were for the City of Kingston, Kingston Twp, Pittsburgh Twp prior to amalgamation in 1998. This data is used for Map Presentations, Web Map Applications and General Analysis.
Facebook
TwitterThis dataset contains boundaries of individual parcels in Allegheny County, including the county block and lot number. As this is a very large dataset, you may wish to use our property information extractor (http://tools.wprdc.org/parcels-n-at/) to download filtered versions of this parcel dataset.
The most authoritative source for this data is now the PASDA page (https://www.pasda.psu.edu/uci/DataSummary.aspx?dataset=1214), which includes links to historical versions of the shapefile representations of this data.
Facebook
TwitterThis dataset portrays the boundaries of the County Council Districts in Allegheny County. The dataset is based on municipal boundaries and City of Pittsburgh ward boundaries and was updated as the result of reapportionment in September 2002. It has also been attributed with the current representatives' names. If viewing this description on the Western Pennsylvania Regional Data Center’s open data portal (http://www.wprdc.org), this dataset is harvested on a weekly basis from Allegheny County’s GIS data portal (http://openac.alcogis.opendata.arcgis.com/). The full metadata record for this dataset can also be found on Allegheny County’s GIS portal. You can access the metadata record and other resources on the GIS portal by clicking on the “Explore” button (and choosing the “Go to resource” option) to the right of the “ArcGIS Open Dataset” text below. Category: Civic Vitality and Governance Organization: Allegheny County Department: Geographic Information Systems Group; Department of Administrative Services Temporal Coverage: 2002-present Data Notes: Coordinate System: Pennsylvania State Plane South Zone 3702; U.S. Survey Foot Development Notes: none Other: none Related Document(s): Data Dictionary (none) Frequency - Data Change: As needed Frequency - Publishing: As needed Data Steward Name: Eli Thomas Data Steward Email: gishelp@alleghenycounty.us
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Pittsburgh Neighborhoods
Facebook
TwitterWatersheds for surface water streams and rivers within Pittsburgh boundaries. StreamStats was the original source, and the geometry was simplified afterwards.
Facebook
TwitterCity of Pittsburgh Street Centerline Data DictionaryEditor Tracking (created_date, created_user, last_edited_date, last_edited_user)Automatically recorded information indicating the creation date and user and the last modified date and user.From/To Street Name (fromstreet, tostreet)Where the street segment ends or begins. The starting point of the line segment is the From Street and the end point of the line segment is the To Street. The names of the cross streets are used where applicable. If the segment does not begin or end at a cross street, CITY LIMIT and DEAD END can both be used. The name of the street itself can also be used in situations where the beginning or end of a segment is in between cross streets.Functional Class (domi_class)A general classification system used by the Department of Mobility and Infrastructure to stratify roads by significance.• Principal Arterial - Roadways with high traffic volumes such as interstate highways, freeways, and expressways; frequently the route of choice for intercity buses and trucks.• Minor Arterial – Roadways that serve trips of moderate length and smaller geographic areas than principal arterials.• Collector – Roadways that “collect” traffic from Local Roads and connect traffic to Arterial roadways. Typically, shorter than Arterial Routes but longer than Local Roads. Collectors provide traffic circulation within residential neighborhoods as well as commercial, industrial, or civic districts.• Local – Roadways that provide direct access to adjacent land, not intended for use in long distance travel. Locals roads provide access to higher systems, and typically don’t carry through traffic movement.• Alley - Streets intended to provide access to the rear or side of lots or buildings in urban areas and not intended for the purpose of vehicular through traffic.• Park Road – Roadways that provide access into and through parks.• Private Road – Privately owned and maintained roads. Private roads are often open to the public in spaces such as shopping malls, airports, and sports arenas. Public access can be restricted to private gated properties.• UnknownLength (measurlgth)The length of the segment measured in feet, projected using the NAD 1983 State Plane Pennsylvania South FIPS 3702 (US Feet) projection.Most Recent Paving Date (replaced)The date a segment was most recently resurfaced, repaved, or otherwise restored.Number of Travel Lanes (num_lanes)Number of travel lanes in any direction of travel on an undivided road. Divided roadways using more than one segment note number of lanes on the given segment only.One Way Designation (oneway)The direction of allowed traffic flow along a route• N: Travel allowed in both directions.• FT: One way travel allowed in the direction the line segment is drawn, from the beginning of the line (from) to the end of the line (to).• TF: One way travel allowed in the opposite direction the line segment is drawn, from the end of the line (to) to the beginning of the line (from).Owner (owner)The owner of a road, usually but not necessarily always responsible for maintenance activities and project initiation.• CITY• STATE• PRIVATE• MT OLIVER• COUNTY• PORT AUTHORITY• OTHER MUNICIPALITY• UnknownRoad Status (class)The status of the road, typically indicating either the maintenance responsibility or if and why a segment cannot traversed by vehicle.Right/Left Council District (council_rt, council_lt)The Council District identifier to the right and left of a segment, when facing the direction the line segment has been drawn.Right/Left Fire Zone (fire_zn_rt, fire_zn_lt)The Bureau of Fire Zone identifier to the right and left of a segment, when facing the direction the line segment has been drawn.Right/Left Neighborhood (hood_right, hood_left)The Neighborhood identifier to the right and left of a segment, when facing the direction the line segment has been drawn.Right/Left Police Zone (zone_right, zone_left)The Bureau of Police identifier to the right and left of a segment, when facing the direction the line segment has been drawn.Right/Left Street Maintenance Division (dpw_zon_rt, dpw_zon_lt)The Department of Public Works Street Maintenance Division identifier to the right and left of a segment, when facing the direction the line segment has been drawn.Right/Left Street Sweeping (sweep_right, sweep_left)The Street Sweeping Route identifier to the right and left of a segment, when facing the direction the line segment has been drawn. The identifier consists of 3 parts: the Public Works Division, the route number, and the date of street sweeping (e.g. ‘5SW8-2W’ is done by the 5th Division, on route number 8, and completed on the 2nd Wednesday of each month).Right/Left Voting District (vote_dt_rt, vote_dt_lt)The Voting District identifier to the right and left of a segment, when facing the direction the line segment has been drawn.Right/Left Ward (ward_rg, ward_lt)The Ward identifier to the right and left of a segment, when facing the direction the line segment has been drawn.Right/Left Zip Code (zipr, zipl)The Zip Code identifier to the right and left of a segment, when facing the direction the line segment has been drawn.Road Removal Date (retired)The date indicating when a segment was removed from the street centerline dataset, usually indicating the road was removed due to new development or other changes in the immediate area.Road Surface Width (roadwidth)Surface width in feet. The measurement of the full traveled way and shoulders/auxiliary lanes.Segment ID (carteid)A unique identifier assigned to each street segment in the City of Pittsburgh.Speed Limit (speedlimit)The speed limit for traffic travelling on both sides of the road.Street Name (streetname, prefix, name, type, suffix, dir)The streetname field contains the name of a road (a combination of prefix, name, type, suffix, dir. Names in this field are written in all capital letters and their abbreviated type. (E.g. MAIN ST, E QUINN RD). The prefix field contains any prefix before the proper street name, usually an abbreviated cardinal direction (N, S, E, W). The name field contains the spelled out street name. The type field contains the type of street (e.g. road, avenue, way). The suffix field contains any suffix after the proper street name, usually an abbreviated cardinal direction (N, S, E, W). The dir field contains the direction of travel in relation to another segment, typically a tunnel, bridge, or highway.Surface Material Type (paveclass)The material used to build the street surface• Asphalt• Concrete• Brick• Blockstone• Unsurfaced• Metal Deck• Wood• Unknown
Facebook
TwitterThis dataset demarcates municipal voting districts in Allegheny County. These were updated in 2019 to match municipal boundaries.
To inquire about obtaining historical versions of this dataset, please contact Mark VanderVen (Mark.VanderVen@AlleghenyCounty.US).
Facebook
TwitterCC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
Allows users to look up City of Pittsburgh Neighborhoods
Facebook
TwitterThis dataset contains the Allegheny County boundary.
Facebook
TwitterThis dataset demarcates the Pennsylvania Senate district boundaries within Allegheny County.
If viewing this description on the Western Pennsylvania Regional Data Center’s open data portal (http://www.wprdc.org), this dataset is harvested on a weekly basis from Allegheny County’s GIS data portal (http://openac.alcogis.opendata.arcgis.com/). The full metadata record for this dataset can also be found on Allegheny County’s GIS portal. You can access the metadata record and other resources on the GIS portal by clicking on the “Explore” button (and choosing the “Go to resource” option) to the right of the “ArcGIS Open Dataset” text below.
Category: Civic Vitality and Governance
Organization: Allegheny County
Department: Geographic Information Systems Group; Department of Administrative Services
Temporal Coverage: 2015
Data Notes:
Coordinate System: Pennsylvania State Plane South Zone 3702; U.S. Survey Foot
Development Notes: none
Other: none
Related Document(s): Data Dictionary (none)
Frequency - Data Change: As needed
Frequency - Publishing: As needed
Data Steward Name: Eli Thomas
Data Steward Email: gishelp@alleghenycounty.us
Facebook
TwitterAbout the G.M. Hopkins Maps History and Background of the Maps Maps produced by the G.M. Hopkins Company have made a lasting impression on the boundaries of many American cities. Between 1870 and 1940, the company produced over 175 atlases and real estate plat maps that primarily covered the Eastern sea board, including cities, counties, and townships in 18 different states and the District of Columbia. In the early years, the company produced county atlases, but gradually focused on city plans and atlases. They were among the first publishers to create a cadastral atlas, a cross between a fire insurance plat and a county atlas prevalent in the 1860s-1870s. These real estate or land ownership maps (also known as plat maps) not only depict property owners, but show lot and block numbers, dimensions, street widths, and other buildings and landmarks, including churches, cemeteries, mills, schools, roads, railroads, lakes, ponds, rivers, and streams. Originally named the G.M. Hopkins and Company, the map-making business was jointly founded in 1865 in Philadelphia, Pa., by the Hopkins brothers, G.M. and Henry. The true identity of G.M. Hopkins remains somewhat of a mystery even today. “G.M.” either stands for Griffith Morgan or George Morgan. There are three different possibilities for the confusion over his identity. “Either the compilers of the earlier [city] directories were negligent; G.M. Hopkins changed his first name; or there were two G.M. Hopkins (father and son) working for the same firm” (Moak, Jefferson M. Philadelphia Mapmakers. Philadelphia: Shackamaxon Society, 1976, p. 258). http://digital.library.pitt.edu/abouthp/#hopkins McKeesport from the original Sanborn maps from 1889.
Facebook
Twitter
Facebook
TwitterIf viewing this description on the Western Pennsylvania Regional Data Center’s open data portal (http://www.wprdc.org), this dataset is harvested on a weekly basis from Allegheny County’s GIS data portal (http://openac.alcogis.opendata.arcgis.com/). The full metadata record for this dataset can also be found on Allegheny County’s GIS portal. You can access the metadata record and other resources on the GIS portal by clicking on the “Explore” button (and choosing the “Go to resource” option) to the right of the “ArcGIS Open Dataset” text below.
Category: Civic Vitality and Governance
Organization: Allegheny County
Department: Geographic Information Systems Group; Department of Administrative Services
Temporal Coverage: current
Data Notes:
Coordinate System: Pennsylvania State Plane South Zone 3702; U.S. Survey Foot
Development Notes: none
Other: none
Related Document(s): Data Dictionary (none)
Frequency - Data Change: As needed
Frequency - Publishing: As needed
Data Steward Name: Eli Thomas
Data Steward Email: gishelp@alleghenycounty.us
Facebook
TwitterAbout the G.M. Hopkins Maps History and Background of the Maps Maps produced by the G.M. Hopkins Company have made a lasting impression on the boundaries of many American cities. Between 1870 and 1940, the company produced over 175 atlases and real estate plat maps that primarily covered the Eastern sea board, including cities, counties, and townships in 18 different states and the District of Columbia. In the early years, the company produced county atlases, but gradually focused on city plans and atlases. They were among the first publishers to create a cadastral atlas, a cross between a fire insurance plat and a county atlas prevalent in the 1860s-1870s. These real estate or land ownership maps (also known as plat maps) not only depict property owners, but show lot and block numbers, dimensions, street widths, and other buildings and landmarks, including churches, cemeteries, mills, schools, roads, railroads, lakes, ponds, rivers, and streams. Originally named the G.M. Hopkins and Company, the map-making business was jointly founded in 1865 in Philadelphia, Pa., by the Hopkins brothers, G.M. and Henry. The true identity of G.M. Hopkins remains somewhat of a mystery even today. “G.M.” either stands for Griffith Morgan or George Morgan. There are three different possibilities for the confusion over his identity. “Either the compilers of the earlier [city] directories were negligent; G.M. Hopkins changed his first name; or there were two G.M. Hopkins (father and son) working for the same firm” (Moak, Jefferson M. Philadelphia Mapmakers. Philadelphia: Shackamaxon Society, 1976, p. 258). http://digital.library.pitt.edu/abouthp/#hopkins McKeesport from the original Sanborn maps from 1889.
Facebook
TwitterCity of Pittsburgh Boundary based on 2020 Census Data. This includes Mt. Oliver Borough which is not a part of Pittsburgh but is included since it is fully enclosed by Pittsburgh. This also includes rivers within Pittsburgh. This is considered current as of August 2023.