The neighborhoods - all layer provides polygons representing neighborhood associations and approximate neighborhood (subdivision) boundaries within the City of Tucson, Arizona. Unofficial neighborhoods are delineated based on the subdivisions layer and may not accurately reflect culturally recognized neighborhoods.Examples of features in this dataset include:Registered Neighborhood AssociationsUnregistered Neighborhoods (Subdivisions) PurposeShows the approximate boundaries of neighborhoods/subdivisions within the City of Tucson.Dataset ClassificationLevel 0 – OpenKnown Uses--Known ErrorsThis layer serves as a general representation of neighborhood associations and subdivision boundaries and may not capture all nuances or changes in neighborhood delineations. Users should verify boundaries with local authorities for precise neighborhood information.Data ContactPlanning and Development Services DepartmentMatt Berubematthew.berube@tucsonaz.govPublisher ContactInformation Technology DepartmentGIS_IT@tucsonaz.govUpdate Frequency/Maintenance DescriptionThe layer is maintained by the City of Tucson's Planning and Development Services Department and is periodically updated to reflect changes in neighborhood associations and subdivisions. Updates may include incorporating new subdivisions or modifications to existing boundaries based on community feedback or administrative changes. The layer is intended for reference purposes and should not be used for legal or regulatory decisions without validation from appropriate authorities.

Displays Speed Limit Ordinances for the City of Tucson. Created by copying features from stnetall.PurposeLine Layer that shows the speed limits of streets in Tucson.Dataset ClassificationLevel 0 - OpenKnown UsesUsed in Various Web MapsKnown ErrorsUrban streets from 12000 scale & rural streets from 100000 scale; 1/3 streets rectified to parcel base. 10/2013: While this layer is maintained as a Shapefile, the coverage format is still required for certain nightly processing. Data ContactDepartment of Transportation and MobilityUpdate FrequencyUpdated as needed

This dataset maps out the boundaries for municipal jurisdictions in Pima County, Arizona. Jurisdictions include:City of TucsonTown of MaranaTown of Oro ValleyTown of SahuaritaCity of South TucsonPima CountyClick here to visit Pima County's Open Data site.PurposeThis layer was developed locate the municipal boundaries of jurisdictions in Pima County, Arizona.Dataset ClassificationLevel 0 - OpenKnown UsesThis layer is not in any known applications.Get Started with this Data• What is the largest incorporated jurisdiction by area?• Which incorporated jurisdiction has the longest boundary?• Which jurisdiction do I live in?Known Errors NoneContactPima CountyUpdate FrequencyAs Needed

The ESZ is used to verify location in creating calls for service and to determine the proper responses for unit recommendations. Layer was created from the Fire Station Boundary polygon shapefile provided by Ann Moser. Edits were done to edge match with streets and other jurisdictional boundaries. Additional edits for splitting boundaries along N/S Broadway and Alpha Trucks.PurposeLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Dataset ClassificationLevel 0 - OpenKnown UsesFor CADKnown ErrorsLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Data ContactLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Update FrequencyOccasionally using ArcMap.Last known update: January 2012

ward_cot displays the six city council districts in the City of Tucson. Ward area legal boundaries are based on Pima County voting precinct legal boundaries. Last updated September 19, 2023.PurposeShows the six wards of the City of Tucson and the respective councilmembers elected them.Dataset ClassificationLevel 0 - OpenKnown Uses--Known Errors--Data ContactCity of Tucson Information Technology Department, GIS Services, GIS_IT@tucsonaz.govUpdate FrequencyUpdated as new annexation or redistricting occurs.

COMPLETED 2010. The data was converted from the most recent (2010) versions of the adopted plans, which can be found at https://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/planning/plans/ Supplemental Information: In March 2010, Pima Association of Governments (PAG), in cooperation with the City of Tucson (City), initiated the Planned Land Use Data Conversion Project. This 9-month effort involved evaluating mapped land use designations and selected spatially explicit policies for nearly 50 of the City's adopted neighborhood, area, and subregional plans and converting the information into a Geographic Information System (GIS) format. Further documentation for this file can be obtained from the City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Department or Pima Association of Governments Technical Services. A brief summary report was provided, as requested, to the City of Tucson which highlights some of the key issues found during the conversion process (e.g., lack of mapping and terminology consistency among plans). The feature class "Plan_boundaries" represents the boundaries of the adopted plans. The feature class "Plan_mapped_land_use" represents the land use designations as they are mapped in the adopted plans. Some information was gathered that is implicit based on the land use designation or zones (see field descriptions below). Since this information is not explicitly stated in the plans, it should only be viewed by City staff for general planning purposes. The feature class "Plan_selected_policies" represents the spatially explicit policies that were fairly straightforward to map. Since these policies are not represented in adopted maps, this feature class should only be viewed by City staff for general planning purposes only. 2010 - created by Jamison Brown, working as an independent contractor for Pima Association of Governments, created this file in 2010 by digitizing boundaries as depicted (i.e. for the mapped land use) or described in the plans (i.e. for the narrative policies). In most cases, this involved tracing based on parcel (paregion) or street center line (stnetall) feature classes. Snapping was used to provide line coincidence. For some map conversions, freehand sketches were drawn to mimick the freehand sketches in the adopted plan. Field descriptions Field descriptions for the "Plan_boundaries" feature class: Plan_Name: Plan name Plan_Type: Plan type (e.g., Neighborhood Plan) Plan_Num: Plan number ADOPT_DATE: Date of Plan adoption IMPORTANT: A disclaimer about the data as it is unofficial. URL: Uniform Resource Locator Field descriptions for the "Plan_mapped_land_use" feature class: Plan_Name: Plan name Plan_Type: Plan type (e.g., Neighborhood Plan) Plan_Num: Plan number LU_DES: Land use designation (e.g., Low density residential) LISTED_ALLOWABLE_ZONES: Allowable zones as listed in the Plan LISTED_RAC_MIN: Minimum residences per acre (if applicable), as listed in the Plan LISTED_RAC_TARGET: Target residences per acre (if applicable), as listed in the Plan LISTED_RAC_MAX: Maximum residences per acre (if applicable), as listed in the Plan LISTED_FAR_MIN: Minimum Floor Area Ratio (if applicable), as listed in the Plan LISTED_FAR_TARGET: Target Floor Area Ratio (if applicable), as listed in the Plan LISTED_FAR_MAX: Maximum Floor Area Ratio (if applicable), as listed in the Plan BUILDING_HEIGHT_MAX Building height maximum (ft.) if determined by Plan policy IMPORTANT: A disclaimer about the data as it is unofficial. URL: Uniform Resource Locator IMPLIED_ALLOWABLE_ZONES: Implied (not listed in the Plan) allowable zones IMPLIED_RAC_MIN: Implied (not listed in the Plan) minimum residences per acre (if applicable) IMPLIED_RAC_TARGET: Implied (not listed in the Plan) target residences per acre (if applicable) IMPLIED_RAC_MAX: Implied (not listed in the Plan) maximum residences per acre (if applicable) IMPLIED_FAR_MIN: Implied (not listed in the Plan) minimum Floor Area Ratio (if applicable) IMPLIED_FAR_TARGET: Implied (not listed in the Plan) target Floor Area Ratio (if applicable) IMPLIED_FAR_MAX: Implied (not listed in the Plan) maximum Floor Area Ratio (if applicable) IMPLIED_LU_CATEGORY: Implied (not listed in the Plan) general land use category. General categories used include residential, office, commercial, industrial, and other.PurposeLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Dataset ClassificationLevel 0 - OpenKnown UsesThis layer is intended to be used in the City of Tucson's Open Data portal and not for regular use in ArcGIS Online, ArcGIS Enterprise or other web applications.Known ErrorsLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Data ContactJohn BeallCity of Tucson Development Services520-791-5550John.Beall@tucsonaz.govUpdate FrequencyLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

File originated from: lfil_ex for landfill sites in eastern Pima County by Pima County, but is being updated by the City of Tucson - Environmental Services. For historic information on this file, refer to the Pima County GIS Technical Services. Additional attribute fields were added to this shapefile for the City of Tucson - Environmental Services projects. City landfill boundaries are approximate and updated as new information becomes available. Original file adopted from Pima County LFIL_EX gis file. See Pima County metadata for original filePurposeTo be used on the City of Tucson - Environmental Services Potential Environmental Concerns Webmap.Dataset ClassificationLevel 0 – OpenKnown UsesNoneKnown ErrorsBoundaries are for general, approximate location of landfill boundaries and are not exact. The City of Tucson has not verified boundaries which had no City of Tucson involvement.ContactTucson Department of Environmental and General ServicesUpdate FrequencyAs Needed

COMPLETED 2010. The data was converted from the most recent (2010) versions of the adopted plans, which can be found at https://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/planning/plans/Supplemental Information: In March 2010, Pima Association of Governments (PAG), in cooperation with the City of Tucson (City), initiated the Planned Land Use Data Conversion Project. This 9-month effort involved evaluating mapped land use designations and selected spatially explicit policies for nearly 50 of the City's adopted neighborhood, area, and subregional plans and converting the information into a Geographic Information System (GIS) format. Further documentation for this file can be obtained from the City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Department or Pima Association of Governments Technical Services. A brief summary report was provided, as requested, to the City of Tucson which highlights some of the key issues found during the conversion process (e.g., lack of mapping and terminology consistency among plans). The feature class "Plan_boundaries" represents the boundaries of the adopted plans. The feature class "Plan_mapped_land_use" represents the land use designations as they are mapped in the adopted plans. Some information was gathered that is implicit based on the land use designation or zones (see field descriptions below). Since this information is not explicitly stated in the plans, it should only be viewed by City staff for general planning purposes. The feature class "Plan_selected_policies" represents the spatially explicit policies that were fairly straightforward to map. Since these policies are not represented in adopted maps, this feature class should only be viewed by City staff for general planning purposes only.2010 - created by Jamison Brown, working as an independent contractor for Pima Association of Governments, created this file in 2010 by digitizing boundaries as depicted (i.e. for the mapped land use) or described in the plans (i.e. for the narrative policies). In most cases, this involved tracing based on parcel (paregion) or street center line (stnetall) feature classes. Snapping was used to provide line coincidence. For some map conversions, freehand sketches were drawn to mimick the freehand sketches in the adopted plan. Field descriptionsField descriptions for the "Plan_boundaries" feature class: Plan_Name: Plan name Plan_Type: Plan type (e.g., Neighborhood Plan) Plan_Num: Plan number ADOPT_DATE: Date of Plan adoption IMPORTANT: A disclaimer about the data as it is unofficial. URL: Uniform Resource Locator Field descriptions for the "Plan_mapped_land_use" feature class: Plan_Name: Plan name Plan_Type: Plan type (e.g., Neighborhood Plan) Plan_Num: Plan number LU_DES: Land use designation (e.g., Low density residential) LISTED_ALLOWABLE_ZONES: Allowable zones as listed in the Plan LISTED_RAC_MIN: Minimum residences per acre (if applicable), as listed in the Plan LISTED_RAC_TARGET: Target residences per acre (if applicable), as listed in the Plan LISTED_RAC_MAX: Maximum residences per acre (if applicable), as listed in the Plan LISTED_FAR_MIN: Minimum Floor Area Ratio (if applicable), as listed in the Plan LISTED_FAR_TARGET: Target Floor Area Ratio (if applicable), as listed in the Plan LISTED_FAR_MAX: Maximum Floor Area Ratio (if applicable), as listed in the Plan BUILDING_HEIGHT_MAX Building height maximum (ft.) if determined by Plan policy IMPORTANT: A disclaimer about the data as it is unofficial. URL: Uniform Resource Locator IMPLIED_ALLOWABLE_ZONES: Implied (not listed in the Plan) allowable zones IMPLIED_RAC_MIN: Implied (not listed in the Plan) minimum residences per acre (if applicable) IMPLIED_RAC_TARGET: Implied (not listed in the Plan) target residences per acre (if applicable) IMPLIED_RAC_MAX: Implied (not listed in the Plan) maximum residences per acre (if applicable) IMPLIED_FAR_MIN: Implied (not listed in the Plan) minimum Floor Area Ratio (if applicable) IMPLIED_FAR_TARGET: Implied (not listed in the Plan) target Floor Area Ratio (if applicable) IMPLIED_FAR_MAX: Implied (not listed in the Plan) maximum Floor Area Ratio (if applicable) IMPLIED_LU_CATEGORY: Implied (not listed in the Plan) general land use category. General categories used include residential, office, commercial, industrial, and other.PurposeLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Dataset ClassificationLevel 0 - OpenKnown UsesLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Known ErrorsLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Data ContactJohn BeallCity of Tucson Development Services520-791-5550John.Beall@tucsonaz.govUpdate FrequencyLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

Displays the smallest unit in the Public Land Survey System; Township/Ranges are subdivided into 36 Sections; each Section is approximately one square mile. These polygons are maintained in the Parcel Fabric. This layer has been adjusted to Section corner data from the GIS parcel Section Auto CAD drawings. It also includes the half Township South of 12S14E Sections 31-34, designated as 12F14E (field TR). TOWNSHIP and RANGE field values are four characters where the last two characters indicate the direction where 01 is North, 02 is East, 03 is South and 04 is West.https://gis.pima.gov/data/contents/metadet.cfm?name=trsPurposeLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Dataset ClassificationLevel 0 – OpenKnown UsesLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Known ErrorsThe Canoa Land Grant area is not part of the Public Land Survey System. The trs layer includes sections in the Canoa Land Grant area as if it had been included in the survey.2021 - This layer contains a Stated Area field in square miles. This is a GIS calculated estimate and should not be used in place of official stated areas from the original documents.Contactgisdata@pima.govUpdate FrequencyLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

Status: UPDATED occasionally using ArcMap Contact: Michael Liberti, Tucson Water, 520-837-2226, Michael.Liberti@tucsonaz.gov Intended Use: Primary data record of service area boundaries. Not intended for map display unless approved by data owner. Known errors/qualifications This is a rough approximation of the obligated areas served by Tucson Water and some errors may exist especially in those areas outside the City of Tucson limits. Does not include the non-potable service area boundaries. The non-potable water system includes all water types that have not been treated to potable standards: reclaimed water lines, raw CAP mains from the canal, secondary effluent piped from the County treatment plant to the Roger Road reclaimed plan, TARP water in the mains between the recovery wells and the treatment plant and the CAVSARP recovery wellfields. Boundaries may overlap other water company service area boundaries because their definition of the boundaries may vary.***SERVED = The parcel has a TW water meter and is consuming water.***OBLIGATED = Either 1) a vacant parcel inside the City of Tucson that does not have a TW meter, or 2) a vacant/abandoned parcel that has a meter, but is not consuming water. ***COMMITTED = a parcel outside the City of Tucson that 1) is in an area of intergovernmental contractual agreement (e.g. Dove Mountain/Continental Ranch...) 2) is a master planned development for which TW previously granted a service agreement (will have a corresponding GREENLINE feature) 3) is under 20 acres and is located adjacent to a delivery pipe and is served on three sides 4) a Tucson Unified School District parcel ***NOT OBLIGATED = Call Tucson Water Development Services for clarification. ALSO NOTE THAT PIPELINE RIGHT-OF-WAYS OUTSIDE TUCSON ARE ALSO COMMITTED (NO PARCEL) So, a parcel can be committed by contract, by prior approval or by location Individuals that live outside Tucson who are not currently served by TW fall under #3. Unless directed otherwise by Tucson Water, by default any parcel outside the City of Tucson that does not have a Tucson Water meter will NOT be served unless they annex. Replaces ObligatedServiceArea feature class formerly maintained in VMDB. The name ObligatedServiceArea is still used, but now is just a filtered view of ServiceArea. September 2010 - loaded ServiceArea shapefile into EDITSDE geodatabase to be maintained as feature class instead of shapefile. Renamed to ServiceArea. ObligatedServiceArea becomes a view of the ServiceArea feature class. sdetable -o create_view -T OBLIGATEDSERVICEAREA -t SERVICEAREA -w "SA_TYPE in ('SERVED','OBLIGATED','COMMITTED')" -c "OBJECTID,SHAPE,SA_TYPE,SA_SUBTYPE,REC_DATE,INSTALLYEAR" -i sde:sqlserver:pw-sql2005 -D editsdeAugust 2010 - ObligatedServiceArea criteria is redefined based on decisions by Mayor and Council. New shapefile called ServiceArea becomes the data of record.10/10/2008 Bryn Enright Copy of most recent Obligated Service Area provided to John Regan from Pima County to post in the GIS Library and MapGuide site.10/10/2008 Bryn Enright Renamed the feature class from admin.ObligatedServiceArea to admin.ObligatedServiceAreaHistory. The most current area will be made available in a new database view called admin.ObligatedServiceArea.10/10/2008 Bryn Enright "Appended the most recent obligated service area created by Michael Liberti which was created by:1. Dissolving the current service area (req_SA_current.shp) with committed areas outside the city (dove mtn, larry's marana, diamond bell, corona de tucson...)2. Erased the city polygon (LIMJURIS) from the dissolve.3. Added the entire city polygon back in (i.e. obligated area) but then erased all of the ""water providers"" with CCNs ('56' water right)." In = req_SA_obligated.shp Out = ADMIN.ObligatedServiceAreaJune 2008 Bryn Enright Shapefile imported into Geodatabase (EMAPDB) In = Req_ServiceArea_v1.shp Out = ObligatedServiceAreaJune 2008 Michael Liberti Layer dissolved to show only 1 polygon for obligated area. In = ServiceArea_v1.shp Out = Req_ServiceArea_v1.shpJune 2008 Michael Liberti Layer updated with new services and existing remote services that were not previously included.February 2008 Michael Liberti Layer updated with new services for the 2008 Update to the Water Plan 2000-2050November 2004 Michael Liberti "Modified PCLIS WATERCOS as collection of PARCELS intersecting SERVICES by M Liberti. Layer created for use in the Water Plan 2000-2050" In=PCLIS WATERCOS Out=ServiceArea_v1.shp Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipiscing elit. Massa enim nec dui nunc. Quis commodo odio aenean sed adipiscing diam donec adipiscing. Nulla pellentesque dignissim enim sit amet venenatis urna. Sit amet volutpat consequat mauris nunc congue nisi vitae. Fames ac turpis egestas maecenas pharetra convallis posuere morbi leo. Morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis. Eget lorem dolor sed viverra ipsum nunc. Id ornare arcu odio ut sem. Morbi leo urna molestie at elementum eu. In metus vulputate eu scelerisque. Lobortis mattis aliquam faucibus purus in massa tempor nec feugiat. Ut sem viverra aliquet eget sit amet tellus cras adipiscing. Lobortis mattis aliquam faucibus purus in massa tempor. Donec massa sapien faucibus et molestie ac feugiat. Et odio pellentesque diam volutpat commodo sed egestas egestas. Pharetra magna ac placerat vestibulum lectus. Fermentum leo vel orci porta non pulvinar neque laoreet suspendissePurposeLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Dataset ClassificationLevel 0 - OpenKnown UsesLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Known ErrorsLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Data ContactLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Update FrequencyLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

This dataset shows zip codes located in Pima County. The layer is maintained by Pima County, originally sourced from the US Postal Service zip code areas. Click here to visit Pima County's Open Data site.PurposeTo delineate zip codes within Pima CountyDataset ClassificationLevel 0 – OpenKnown UsesNoneKnown ErrorsMetropolitan boundaries are delineated well. Rural boundaries are extrapolated in some areas. Refer to US Postal Service for latest ZIP Code routes and for exact individual addresses. Zip codes defined by the US Postal Service as "unique", "military", and "post office box" are not included in this layer as they have no defined areas.ContactGISData@pima.govUpdate FrequencyAs Needed

The dataset includes approximate flood-hazard boundary areas prepared by both detailed and approximate methods. Study limits were defined using the highlighted drainage-problem areas shown on the city's zoning base maps as a guide. Floodplain studies completed and sealed in 2007 and 2008. The highlighted drainage problem areas shown on the city's zoning base maps did not distinguish between FEMA flood plains and problem areas approximated either from drainage complaints or from information included in subdivision/development drainage studies.PurposeLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Dataset ClassificationLevel 0 - OpenKnown UsesThis layer is intended to be used in the City of Tucson's Open Data portal and not for regular use in ArcGIS Online, ArcGIS Enterprise or other web applications.Known ErrorsLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Data ContactLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Update FrequencyLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

A copy of located in editsde for backup purposes. The dataset includes approximate flood-hazard boundary areas prepared by both detailed and approximate methods. Study limits were defined using the highlighted drainage-problem areas shown on the city's zoning base maps as a guide. Floodplain studies completed and sealed in 2007 and 2008 . Shape files created April 2011. Shape files exported from Autodesk Map 3D 2006 and projected using ArcMap 10. Maintenance and frequency to be determined by City of Tucson, Planning and Development ServicesReplace feature class "dsdFHZStudy2007CrossSections" See feature class "cotFloodHazardsPurposeLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Dataset ClassificationLevel 0 - OpenKnown UsesThis layer is intended to be used in the Open Data portal and not for regular use in ArcGIS Online and ArcGIS Enterprise.Known ErrorsLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Data ContactLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Update FrequencyLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

The dataset includes approximate flood-hazard boundary areas prepared by both detailed and approximate methods. Study limits were defined using the highlighted drainage-problem areas shown on the city's zoning base maps as a guide. Floodplain studies completed and sealed in 2007 and 2008 . Shape files created April 2011. Shape files exported from Autodesk Map 3D 2006 and projected using ArcMap 10.PurposeThis layer is intended to be used in the Open Data portal and not for regular use in ArcGIS Online and ArcGIS Enterprise.Dataset ClassificationLevel 0 - OpenKnown UsesLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Known ErrorsLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Data ContactLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Update FrequencyMaintenance and frequency to be determined by City of Tucson, Planning and Development Services.

Plan submitted by: arizconway@msn.com on 10/5/2021 USER DESCRIPTION: N/A USER PLAN OBJECTIVE: This Map is intended meet all the requirements of Proposition 106 with special emphasis on Communities of Interest and County lines, City and Town limits and Native American Community boundaries. No Native American Communities are split. The Northern Arizona urban area including Flagstaff and Prescott are in a single District. Phoenix is included in six Phoenix only Districts, Mesa in two Mesa only Districts, Tucson in two Tucson only Districts, and Glendale in one Glendale only District. Yuma is in a one District. Marana and the Catalina Foothills are separated from Tucson. Sun City and Sun City West are in the same District.

This web map contains the new Hybrid Reference Layer vector tile layer, which is designed to be used to overlay imagery. The vector tile layer is similar in content and style to the popular Imagery with Labels map, which is delivered as a map service with raster tiles, with additional labels for transportation features.The 'Imagery with Labels' basemap contains the World Imagery map service and the World Boundaries and Places map service, so when you use that basemap you get boundaries and places, but you don't get highways and streets at small scales or street labels at large scale.If you prefer a map that uses raster tiles for both boundary and transportation features, you can use the Imagery with Labels and Transportation map.

This layer shows poverty status by age group. This is shown by tract, county, and state boundaries. This service is updated annually to contain the most currently released American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year data, and contains estimates and margins of error. There are also additional calculated attributes related to this topic, which can be mapped or used within analysis. Poverty status is based on income in past 12 months of survey. This layer is symbolized to show the percentage of the population whose income falls below the Federal poverty line. To see the full list of attributes available in this service, go to the "Data" tab, and choose "Fields" at the top right. Current Vintage: 2013-2017ACS Table(s): B17020Data downloaded from: Census Bureau's API for American Community Survey Date of API call: December 7, 2018National Figures: American Fact FinderThe United States Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS):About the SurveyGeography & ACSTechnical DocumentationNews & UpdatesThis ready-to-use layer can be used within ArcGIS Pro, ArcGIS Online, its configurable apps, dashboards, Story Maps, custom apps, and mobile apps. Data can also be exported for offline workflows. Please cite the Census and ACS when using this data.Data Note from the Census:Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables.Data Processing Notes:This dataset is updated automatically when the most current vintage of ACS data is released each year. The service contains the ACS data as of the current vintage listed. Tabular data is updated annually with the Census Bureau's release schedule. This may alter data values, fields, and boundaries. Click here to learn more about ACS data releases.Boundaries come from the US Census TIGER geodatabases. Boundaries are updated at the same time as the data updates (annually), and the boundary vintage appropriately matches the data vintage as specified by the Census. These are Census boundaries with water and/or coastlines clipped for cartographic purposes. For census tracts, the water cutouts are derived from a subset of the 2010 AWATER (Area Water) boundaries offered by TIGER. For state and county boundaries, the water and coastlines are derived from the coastlines of the 500k TIGER Cartographic Boundary Shapefiles. The original AWATER and ALAND fields are still available as attributes within the data table (units are square meters). The States layer contains 52 records - all US states, Washington D.C., and Puerto RicoCensus tracts with no population that occur in areas of water, such as oceans, are removed from this data service (Census Tracts beginning with 99).Percentages and derived counts, and associated margins of error, are calculated values (that can be identified by the "_calc_" stub in the field name), and abide by the specifications defined by the American Community Survey.Field alias names were created based on the Table Shells file available from the American Community Survey Summary File Documentation page.Negative values (e.g., -555555...) have been set to null. These negative values exist in the raw API data to indicate the following situations:The margin of error column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute a standard error and thus the margin of error. A statistical test is not appropriate.Either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute an estimate, or a ratio of medians cannot be calculated because one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution.The median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution, or in the upper interval of an open-ended distribution. A statistical test is not appropriate.The estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate.The data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small. NOTE: any calculated percentages or counts that contain estimates that have null margins of error yield null margins of error for the calculated fields.