Neighborhood associations within the Tulsa city limits. This is not the neighborhoods within Tulsa. For questions regarding neighborhood associations, contact the Working in Neighborhoods department. This dataset should only be used as a supplement to official records.

This resource is a member of a series. The TIGER/Line shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) System (MTS). The MTS represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line shapefile is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. The All Roads shapefile includes all features within the MTS Super Class "Road/Path Features" distinguished where the MAF/TIGER Feature Classification Code (MTFCC) for the feature in the MTS that begins with "S". This includes all primary, secondary, local neighborhood, and rural roads, city streets, vehicular trails (4wd), ramps, service drives, alleys, parking lot roads, private roads for service vehicles (logging, oil fields, ranches, etc.), bike paths or trails, bridle/horse paths, walkways/pedestrian trails, and stairways.

Council Districts within the Tulsa city limits. This dataset should only be used as a supplement to official records.

Tulsa HP Zoning within the Tulsa city limits. This dataset should only be used as a supplement to official records.

There is no description for this dataset.

Development Plans within the Tulsa city limits. This dataset should only be used as a supplement to official records.

This feature class models the future "ultimate" land use condition of the Tulsa Metro Area and the hydrologic curve numbers (CN) that correspond to the land use categories for various soil types. The land use categories are an amalgamation of the National Land Use Land Cover (LULC) database and local Future Land Use data contained within feature classes provided by the local municipalities (Bixby, Broken Arrow, Glenpool, Jenks, Owasso, Sand Springs, Sperry, City of Tulsa, and Tulsa County). The National LULC database forms the base of the dataset. Anywhere local future land use data was available, the associated polygons replaced the National LULC data. The dataset is clipped to an area that bounds the major hydrologic catchments that impact the City of Tulsa. The local datasets were altered programmatically to remove polygons that were duplicates or that lacked data that described the future land use of that polygon. In the case of the City of Tulsa, the future land use in areas deemed "stable" were removed under the assumption that the National Land Use Land Cover dataset of the current condition (derived through remote sensing) is more detailed and accurate than broad planning areas if the condition is not expected to change. This dataset is intended to be used in hydrologic modeling to represent the "ultimate" condition that is currently planned for ultimate future build-out with future development. For each land use condition, the city storm water engineer has attributed CN values, a hydrologic parameter that describes the stormwater runoff potential, that correspond to each land use category for each soil type (A, B, C, D, A/B. A/C, B/C, A/D, B/C, C/D). The numbers were assigned for each land use category by selecting the best match to charts of research values from a number of scientifically validated sources: USDA (United state Department of Agriculture) Urban Hydrology for Small Watershed, Technical release 55 (TR-55) reference manual, 210-VI-TR-55, Second Ed., June 1986.Chow, V.T. et al., 1988. Applied Hydrology. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc. New York, NY.National engineering handbook, Part 630 Hydrology, Section 4-Hydrology, Chapter 5-10. National Resources Conservation Services (NRCS), 210-vi, NEH, September 1997, Washington, DC.United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 1959a. Forest and range hydrology handbook. Washington, DC.United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 1959b. Section 1 of Handbook on methods of hydrologic analysis, Section 1. Washington, DC.United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2003. Small Watershed Hydrology (WinTR–55), November 2003.United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2004. Watershed Hydrology (WinTR–20), draft, March 2004.Soil Conservation Service, 1982. TR-20, Project Formulation-Hydrology, Technical Release 20, Lanham, MD.ODOT (Oklahoma Department of Transportation) Roadway Drainage Manual, Chapter 7 Hydrology, November 2014.USDOT (United state Department of Transportation) Hydraulic Engineering Circular (HEC-22) No. 22, 3rd Edition, Urban Drainage Design Manual, Publication No. FHWA-NHI-10-009, September 2009, Revised August 2013.AASHTO. Highway Drainage Guidelines, Chapter 2 Hydrology. Washington, DC : Technical Committee on Hydrology and Hydraulics, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2007.FHWA. Highway Hydrology, Hydraulic Design Series No. 2, 2nd Edition. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration, 2002. FHWA-NHI-02-001.NCRS. A Method for Estimating Volume and Rate of Runoff in Small Watersheds. Washington, DC : National Resources Conservation Service, US Department of Agriculture, 1973. SCS-TP-149.Chow, V. T., and B. C. Yen, Urban stormwater runoff: determination of volumes and flowrates, report EPA-600/2-76-116, Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, May 1976.Chow, V.T. 1959. Open channel hydraulics. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc. New York, NY.American Society of Civil Engineers, 1992. Design and Construction of Urban Stormwater Management Systems, "ASCE Manuals and Reports of Engineering Practice No. 77, WEF Manual of Practice FD-20," New York, NY.American Public Works Association Research Foundation and the Institute for Water Resources, 1981. Urban Stormwater Management, Special Report No. 49, American Public Works Association, Washington, D.C.Rawls, W.J., A. Shalaby, and R.H. McCuen. 1981. Evaluation of methods for determining urban runoff curve numbers. Trans. Amer. Soc. Agriculture. Eng. 24(6):1562-1566