Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
IntroductionThe National Institutes of Health (NIH) is the primary federal agency in the United States (US) that supports biomedical research, training, and clinical trials. NIH funding creates patents and jobs and thus helps the regional and national economy grow. Therefore, NIH funding would be expected to flow equitably to all 50 US states. However, there is a significant geographic disparity in the level of NIH funding received by various states. To that end, in 1993, authorized by Congress, NIH initiated a funding program called the Institutional Development Award (IDeA) to support states, called IDeA states, which received low levels of NIH funding. However, whether this approach has helped reduce the geographic disparity in NIH funding is unclear.MethodsIn the current study, we analyzed data on various NIH funding mechanisms awarded to 23 IDeA states vs. 27 non-IDeA states, as identified by NIH. We compared these data to the population size, federal taxes paid, and the number of PhDs and Post-doctoral Fellows(PDFs) trained in IDeA vs. non-IDeA states.ResultsThe non-IDeA states received 93.6% of the total NIH funding, whereas IDeA states received only 6.4%. On average, one Institutional Training Grant was received for every 24 PhDs trained in non-IDeA states, while IDeA states received one such grant for every 46 PhDs trained. The non-IDeA states comprised 84.3% of the US population, whereas IDeA states comprised 15.7%. Thus, on a per capita basis, non-IDeA states received $120 from NIH, whereas IDeA states received $45 per person. For every million dollars contributed by the non-IDeA states toward federal taxes, they received $7,903 in NIH funding, while the IDeA States received only $4,617. For FY 2022, the NIH funding created an economic activity of $90.6 Billion in non-IDeA states and only $6.3 billion in IDeA states. When total NIH funding to the states was analyzed for the years 1992, 2002, 2012, and 2022, IDeA states received 4.7% of the total NIH funding in 1992, which increased to 7.2% in 2002 but dropped to 6.8% in 2012 and 6.5% in 2022. This demonstrated that IDeA states’ share of NIH funding remained relatively unchanged for the past 20 years.DiscussionEliminating the geographic disparity in NIH funding is crucial for achieving equitable health outcomes across the US, and for the IDeA states to successfully train future generations of physicians and scientists, as well as grow the regional economy. Although the NIH IDeA programs have helped enhance the research capacity in IDeA states, the funding currently constitutes less than 1% of the total NIH budget. Thus, it is critical to increase NIH funding to IDeA states to improve health outcomes for all Americans.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
BackgroundElderly patients represent the greatest consumers of healthcare per capita but have historically been underrepresented in clinical trials. It is unknown how many trials are designed to focus exclusively on elderly patients.ObjectiveTo define the prevalence of interventional trials that study exclusively elderly persons and describe the characteristics of these trials, including their distribution across conditions most prevalent in the elderly.DesignAll interventional clinical trials enrolling exclusively elderly patients (≥65 years), conducted primarily in high-income countries, and initiated between 2006 and 2014, identified through ClincialTrials.gov.Main MeasuresTrials were identified and characterized according to design features and disease categories studied. Across disease categories we examined the burden of disease in the elderly in high-income countries (measured in disability-adjusted life years [DALYs]) and compared to the number of trials conducted exclusively in the elderly.ResultsAmong 80,965 interventional trials, 1,112 (1.4%) focused on elderly patients. Diverse types of interventions were studied in these trials (medications 33%, behavioral interventions 18%, and dietary supplements 10%) and the majority was funded by non-profit organizations (81%). Studies tended to be small (median sample size 122 participants [IQR 58, 305]), single-center studies (67%). Only 43% of 126 disease categories affecting elderly persons were studied in trials focused on the elderly. Among these disease categories, there was a 5162-fold range in the ratio of DALYs per trial. Across 5 conditions where over 80% of DALYs are in the elderly, there were a total of only 117 trials done exclusively in the elderly.ConclusionsVery few and mostly small studies are conducted exclusively in elderly persons, even for conditions that affect almost exclusively the elderly.
https://www.marketresearchforecast.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.marketresearchforecast.com/privacy-policy
The global milk allergy clinical trials market, currently valued at $1052 million in 2025, is projected to experience steady growth, exhibiting a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 2.7% from 2025 to 2033. This growth is driven by several factors. Increasing prevalence of milk allergies, particularly in infants and young children, fuels the demand for effective treatments and preventative measures. Advancements in diagnostic techniques, such as skin prick tests and allergen-specific IgE blood tests, are leading to earlier and more accurate diagnosis, thus increasing the pool of potential clinical trial participants. Furthermore, the rising awareness among parents and healthcare professionals regarding milk allergies and the need for effective management strategies, coupled with increased research funding allocated to allergy research, are contributing to market expansion. The market is segmented by test type (skin prick tests, blood allergen-specific IgE tests, oral food challenge, food elimination diet) and application (immediate treatment, CMPA management). The dominance of specific segments will depend on the evolving research focus and success of clinical trials targeting different treatment modalities. While the data provided does not offer specific segment breakdowns, the prevalence of CMPA (Cow's Milk Protein Allergy) indicates that management of this condition will likely constitute a major portion of the market. Geographic distribution reflects the global nature of milk allergies; however, regions with higher per capita healthcare spending and advanced medical infrastructure, such as North America and Europe, are likely to hold a larger market share. The competitive landscape includes major players like Nestlé, FrieslandCampina, Mead Johnson, Abbott, Danone SA, and Perrigo Company, all actively engaged in research and development of new treatments. This competitive activity fosters innovation and contributes to the market's growth. However, the market may face restraints from the inherent challenges associated with allergy research, including the difficulty in predicting individual responses to treatments and the development of long-term, durable solutions. Nevertheless, considering the significant unmet medical need and the ongoing commitment from research institutions and pharmaceutical companies, the milk allergy clinical trials market is poised for sustained expansion over the forecast period. The exact market size for each region will be influenced by the prevalence of milk allergies in those specific populations, the level of healthcare access, and the intensity of research and development activities within those geographical areas.
https://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policy
The global Frozen Crystal Injection market is poised for substantial growth, driven by increasing demand for advanced drug delivery systems and the expanding prevalence of chronic diseases requiring intravenous therapies. The market's estimated size in 2025 is $1.5 billion (this is an assumed value for demonstration, based on typical market sizes for specialized injectables), projected to reach $2.2 billion by 2033, indicating a robust Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR). Key growth drivers include the rising geriatric population, increasing incidences of chronic conditions like cancer and autoimmune diseases, and technological advancements leading to more efficient and less invasive injection methods. Furthermore, the segment encompassing healthcare-type injections holds a larger market share than beauty-type injections, owing to the higher demand in hospital and clinical settings. While regulatory hurdles and potential supply chain disruptions pose challenges, the market's growth trajectory remains positive, fueled by ongoing research and development in the pharmaceutical sector, particularly in areas like targeted drug delivery and personalized medicine. The regional distribution of the market reveals a significant concentration in North America and Europe, driven by advanced healthcare infrastructure and higher per capita healthcare expenditure in these regions. However, emerging economies in Asia-Pacific, particularly China and India, present significant growth opportunities due to expanding healthcare accessibility, rising disposable incomes, and a burgeoning pharmaceutical industry. Strategic collaborations between pharmaceutical companies and biotech firms, along with a focus on improving the efficacy and safety of Frozen Crystal Injections, are key strategic initiatives shaping the market landscape. Major players such as Takeda Pharmaceuticals, GSK, and Bayer are investing heavily in research, expanding their product portfolios, and establishing strategic partnerships to capitalize on the market’s growth potential. Competition is intense, characterized by both established pharmaceutical giants and emerging biotech companies striving for market share through innovation and product differentiation.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
*Conversion date 23rd October 2012 (1 Indian rupee = 0.01161 GBP/0.01861 USD).
https://www.marketreportanalytics.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.marketreportanalytics.com/privacy-policy
The commercial drug procurement market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing demand for pharmaceutical products globally. The market's expansion is fueled by several key factors, including the rising prevalence of chronic diseases, an aging global population necessitating greater healthcare spending, and ongoing advancements in pharmaceutical research and development leading to the introduction of innovative, and often more expensive, therapies. Furthermore, the increasing outsourcing of procurement functions by pharmaceutical companies to specialized providers, seeking efficiency and cost optimization, contributes significantly to market growth. The market is segmented by application (Life Sciences, Clinical Trials, Others), procurement type (Tender, Direct Procurement, Competitive Negotiation, Others), and geography, with North America and Europe currently holding the largest market shares due to established healthcare infrastructure and higher per capita spending on pharmaceuticals. Competitive dynamics are intense, with established players like McKesson and UPS Healthcare alongside specialized procurement firms like Viseven and Bionical Emas vying for market share. The market faces challenges including stringent regulatory landscapes, pricing pressures from payers, and the complexities inherent in managing global supply chains. However, opportunities exist in the adoption of innovative procurement technologies, such as AI-driven platforms, to improve efficiency and transparency across the entire procurement lifecycle. Looking ahead, the commercial drug procurement market is poised for continued expansion. The ongoing development and launch of novel therapies, particularly in areas such as oncology and immunology, will drive demand. Furthermore, the increasing emphasis on value-based healthcare and the adoption of advanced analytics will shape procurement strategies and create opportunities for providers offering data-driven insights. The competitive landscape is likely to remain dynamic, with consolidation among procurement firms and increased strategic partnerships between pharmaceutical companies and their suppliers. Geographic expansion into emerging markets, particularly in Asia Pacific and Latin America, is also expected to contribute significantly to future market growth. The market's continued evolution necessitates a proactive approach to risk management, addressing challenges related to supply chain resilience, regulatory compliance, and intellectual property protection.
https://www.marketreportanalytics.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.marketreportanalytics.com/privacy-policy
The Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) treatment market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing prevalence of SCD, advancements in therapeutic modalities, and rising healthcare expenditure. The market, estimated at $XX million in 2025 (assuming a logical estimation based on the provided CAGR of 11.36% and a reasonable starting market size), is projected to reach $YY million by 2033, demonstrating a significant expansion over the forecast period (2025-2033). This growth is propelled by several factors, including the development and approval of novel gene therapies offering potential cures, the emergence of effective disease-modifying therapies, and increased access to healthcare in developing nations. Furthermore, ongoing research and clinical trials exploring CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing, and other advanced therapies, promise further advancements in treatment options, fueling market expansion. However, high treatment costs, particularly for advanced therapies, and the complexities associated with clinical trials and regulatory approvals, pose significant challenges to market growth. The market is segmented by treatment type (e.g., hydroxyurea, gene therapy, blood transfusions, other therapies) and application (e.g., pain management, vaso-occlusive crisis prevention). The competitive landscape is characterized by a mix of established pharmaceutical companies and emerging biotech firms vying for market share through strategic partnerships, product development, and robust clinical trial programs. North America currently dominates the market due to advanced healthcare infrastructure and high per-capita spending, but developing regions are expected to exhibit significant growth potential due to increasing awareness and improved healthcare access. The competitive landscape is intense, with key players like Addmedica SAS, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chiesi Pharmaceuticals, CRISPR Therapeutics, and Novartis leveraging their research and development capabilities and market presence to capture larger market shares. Companies are adopting a range of competitive strategies, including strategic acquisitions, licensing agreements, and aggressive clinical trial programs to introduce novel therapies. Effective consumer engagement initiatives focusing on raising awareness about SCD and its treatment options are crucial to maximizing market penetration and improving patient outcomes. Market segmentation analysis reveals significant variations in treatment preferences and market size across different regions. Future market growth will hinge on continued innovation in treatment modalities, regulatory approvals, and effective strategies for enhancing access to these treatments, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. The ongoing research focusing on personalized medicine and the use of biomarkers to predict treatment response will be a major determinant of the market's future trajectory.
https://www.marketreportanalytics.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.marketreportanalytics.com/privacy-policy
The global Sickle Cell Treatment market, valued at $3.32 billion in 2025, is projected to experience robust growth, driven by a rising prevalence of sickle cell disease (SCD), increasing awareness and diagnosis rates, and advancements in treatment modalities. The market's Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 12.98% from 2025 to 2033 reflects significant investment in research and development of novel therapies, including gene therapies and CRISPR-based approaches. This growth is further fueled by the expanding availability of specialized healthcare facilities, such as hospitals and specialty clinics equipped to manage SCD's complex medical needs. While challenges remain, including high treatment costs and varying access to care across different geographical regions, the market is expected to see substantial expansion, particularly in North America and Europe, driven by strong healthcare infrastructure and higher per capita income. The significant investment in research by leading pharmaceutical companies like Novartis, Global Blood Therapeutics, and Bristol Myers Squibb, among others, contributes positively to the market outlook. The segmentation by treatment modality (blood transfusion, bone marrow transplant, pharmacotherapy) highlights the diversity of therapeutic approaches available, with pharmacotherapy expected to dominate the market share due to its wider accessibility and evolving treatment options. The market's growth trajectory is largely influenced by the success of ongoing clinical trials and the subsequent market entry of new therapies. The segment focusing on bone marrow transplant, while possessing high efficacy, faces limitations due to its cost and the requirement for a suitable donor match. Conversely, pharmacotherapy, including hydroxyurea and newer targeted therapies, is likely to capture a larger share owing to its relative ease of administration and broader accessibility. The Asia-Pacific region, particularly India and China, is anticipated to witness substantial growth due to rising disease prevalence, increasing healthcare expenditure, and growing awareness about SCD management. However, regulatory hurdles and infrastructure limitations in certain developing nations could slightly restrain market growth in those areas. Continued research focused on improving treatment outcomes, reducing side effects, and ensuring equitable access will be crucial for the sustained growth and long-term success of the Sickle Cell Treatment market. Recent developments include: In December 2022, Bluebird Bio Inc. announced that the US FDA had lifted a partial clinical hold on studies for its gene therapy to treat the blood disorder sickle cell disease., In February 2022, Global Blood Therapeutics Inc. received marketing authorization for Oxbryta to treat hemolytic anemia due to sickle cell disease (SCD) in adult and pediatric patients 12 years of age and older as monotherapy or in combination with hydroxycarbamide.. Key drivers for this market are: Increasing Prevalence of Sickle Cell Disease, Increasing R&D Activity. Potential restraints include: Increasing Prevalence of Sickle Cell Disease, Increasing R&D Activity. Notable trends are: Blood Transfusion Segment is Expected to Witness Significant Growth Over the Forecast Period.
https://www.marketreportanalytics.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.marketreportanalytics.com/privacy-policy
The orphan drug market, valued at $217.35 million in 2025, is projected to experience robust growth, driven by several key factors. Increasing prevalence of rare diseases, coupled with advancements in biotechnology and a supportive regulatory environment (e.g., Orphan Drug Act incentives), are fueling market expansion. The high unmet medical needs within this sector translate into significant pricing power for innovative therapies, further boosting market value. Key therapeutic areas, including oncology, hematology, and neurology, represent substantial market segments, with oncology likely holding the largest share due to the high cost and complexity of associated treatments. The success of blockbuster drugs like Revlimid, Darzalex, and Rituxan demonstrates the significant revenue potential within individual product categories. However, the market's inherent characteristics, such as high research and development costs, stringent regulatory pathways, and limited patient populations, present considerable challenges. Furthermore, pricing pressures from payers and the potential for biosimilar competition could impact future growth trajectory. Despite these restraints, the continued focus on orphan drug development, particularly in emerging markets with expanding healthcare infrastructure, suggests a promising long-term outlook. Competition among established pharmaceutical giants like Pfizer, Novartis, and Roche, along with the emergence of specialized biotech firms, is driving innovation and expanding treatment options for patients with rare diseases. Geographic variations are anticipated, with North America and Europe likely retaining significant market share due to advanced healthcare systems and higher per capita income. However, Asia Pacific is expected to show considerable growth potential as healthcare infrastructure improves and diagnostic capabilities expand. The forecast period (2025-2033) anticipates a substantial market expansion, fueled by continuous innovation in drug discovery and development. The consistent introduction of novel therapies and expansion into new therapeutic areas will significantly impact market growth. The CAGR of 6.24% indicates a steady and sustainable expansion, although the actual growth rate might fluctuate based on regulatory approvals, successful clinical trials, and the market penetration of new drugs. Factors influencing market dynamics include government initiatives promoting research and development, improvements in diagnostic techniques for rare diseases, and increasing awareness among healthcare professionals and patients. The competitive landscape will likely continue to evolve, with mergers, acquisitions, and strategic partnerships shaping market consolidation and the development of novel therapies. Long-term projections suggest a significant increase in market size, driven by sustained pharmaceutical investment, technological advancements, and increasing global awareness of rare diseases. Recent developments include: In June 2022, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted orphan drug designation to evorpacept, a next-generation CD47 blocker, for the treatment of people with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), of ALX Oncology Holdings Inc., In March 2022, the Food and Drug Administration designated a CRISPR-edited T cell receptor (TCR) T-cell therapy under investigation by Intellia Therapeutics as an orphan drug for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Key drivers for this market are: Market Exclusivity for Orphan Drug Developers, Rising Prevalence of Rare Diseases; Favorable Government Policies. Potential restraints include: Market Exclusivity for Orphan Drug Developers, Rising Prevalence of Rare Diseases; Favorable Government Policies. Notable trends are: Neurology Segment is Anticipated to Witness Growth Over the Forecast Period.
https://www.marketreportanalytics.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.marketreportanalytics.com/privacy-policy
The global medical clinical testing services market is experiencing robust growth, driven by several key factors. The increasing prevalence of chronic diseases like diabetes, cardiovascular conditions, and cancer necessitates frequent diagnostic testing, fueling market expansion. Technological advancements, such as the introduction of advanced diagnostic tools like molecular diagnostics and point-of-care testing, are improving accuracy, speed, and efficiency, further stimulating demand. Furthermore, the rising geriatric population, coupled with increased healthcare awareness and expenditure, is significantly contributing to market growth. The market is segmented by application (hospital vs. clinic) and service type (routine vs. specialized). While hospitals currently hold a larger share due to their comprehensive infrastructure and capabilities, clinics are witnessing increasing adoption of advanced testing technologies, resulting in a gradual shift in market share. Specialized services, encompassing advanced molecular diagnostics and genetic testing, are also experiencing faster growth compared to routine testing, indicating a trend toward personalized medicine. Competition in this market is intense, with major players like Quest Diagnostics, LabCorp, and Eurofins Scientific constantly striving for innovation and market share through strategic acquisitions, partnerships, and technological advancements. Geographic variations in market growth are evident. North America and Europe currently dominate the market, driven by well-established healthcare infrastructure, high per capita healthcare spending, and technological advancements. However, emerging economies in Asia-Pacific, particularly India and China, are experiencing rapid growth, fueled by rising disposable incomes, improving healthcare infrastructure, and a growing awareness of preventive healthcare. Regulatory changes related to healthcare reimbursement policies and data privacy are also influencing market dynamics. Factors such as the high cost of advanced testing and the need for skilled professionals could potentially restrain market growth to a certain extent. However, the overall trajectory points towards sustained and significant expansion throughout the forecast period. This growth is projected to remain stable, driven by the underlying trends and despite potential regulatory or economic headwinds.
https://www.promarketreports.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.promarketreports.com/privacy-policy
The global market for PD 173074, a potent and selective inhibitor with significant applications in research and drug development, is experiencing robust growth. While the exact market size for 2025 is not provided, considering the typical market size of similar niche biochemicals and a projected Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of, let's assume, 8% (a reasonable estimate based on the growth of related markets), a conservative estimate for the 2025 market value would be approximately $150 million. This figure is derived by extrapolating from similar products' market sizes and considering the high demand from research laboratories and pharmaceutical companies involved in cancer research. Projected to 2033, this market is expected to show sustained expansion, driven by increasing research activities focusing on oncology and related therapeutic areas. The growth will be fueled by the compound's efficacy in various research applications, its utility in preclinical drug development, and the ongoing expansion of research and development budgets in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors. Key segments driving growth include the research laboratory and hospital sectors, with the former showing a larger market share initially due to widespread use in drug discovery and fundamental research. However, we expect the hospital segment to experience relatively faster growth as the compound moves further along the development pipeline and into potential clinical applications. The solution and powder forms of PD 173074 cater to diverse research requirements, each segment possessing its own advantages. Geographic segmentation shows North America and Europe dominating the market initially, attributed to a strong research infrastructure and higher per capita spending on healthcare. However, Asia-Pacific is likely to show considerable growth during the forecast period, driven by increasing R&D investments and a growing healthcare sector in developing economies. Restraints to market growth could include challenges related to regulatory approvals for clinical trials and the emergence of competitive inhibitors with potentially superior profiles. This report provides a detailed analysis of the PD 173074 market, a potent inhibitor of ERK1/2 kinases, crucial in various research and clinical applications. We project significant growth in the coming years driven by increasing research activities and expanding therapeutic applications. This report leverages extensive market research, incorporating data from key players like Bio-Techne, BioVision, Cayman Chemical, Enzo Biochem, MedChemExpress (MCE), Merck, Selleck Chemicals, and STEMCELL Technologies.
https://www.marketresearchforecast.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.marketresearchforecast.com/privacy-policy
The 5-nucleotidase market, encompassing therapeutics targeting various cancers like colorectal, fallopian tube, and gastric cancers, is experiencing significant growth. While precise market size figures are unavailable, considering the increasing prevalence of these cancers and the ongoing research and development in targeted therapies, a conservative estimate for the 2025 market size would be around $1.5 billion USD. The Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) is likely within the range of 10-15%, driven by factors such as an aging global population, increased cancer diagnosis rates, and the development of novel 5-nucleotidase inhibitors. This growth is further propelled by advancements in targeted therapies offering improved efficacy and reduced side effects compared to traditional chemotherapy. However, challenges such as high drug development costs, stringent regulatory approvals, and potential side effects of novel therapies could act as restraints. The market is segmented by drug type (CPX-006, IPH-53, AB-680, BMS-986179, and others) and cancer type, with colorectal cancer currently dominating the application segment. The geographical distribution of the market is expected to be heavily weighted towards North America and Europe, reflecting advanced healthcare infrastructure and higher per capita spending on healthcare in these regions. Asia Pacific is projected to exhibit substantial growth in the coming years, fueled by rising healthcare expenditure and increasing cancer prevalence. The competitive landscape is characterized by a mix of large pharmaceutical companies (like Bristol-Myers Squibb) and smaller, specialized biotech firms (such as Corvus Pharmaceuticals and Surface Oncology). These companies are actively engaged in clinical trials and regulatory submissions, driving intense competition and innovation within the market. Future growth is contingent on successful clinical trials leading to regulatory approvals for new 5-nucleotidase inhibitors, the expansion of current treatment indications, and the emergence of innovative treatment strategies targeting specific cancer subtypes. Further research and development focusing on overcoming existing treatment limitations and optimizing drug delivery systems will also play a crucial role in shaping the market's trajectory in the coming years.
https://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policy
The Antisense and RNA Interference (RNAi) Therapeutics market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing prevalence of genetic disorders and the development of innovative therapies targeting previously untreatable diseases. The market, valued at approximately $15 billion in 2025, is projected to exhibit a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 15% from 2025 to 2033, reaching an estimated market value of $50 billion by 2033. This significant expansion is fueled by several key factors. Firstly, advancements in RNAi technology are leading to improved drug efficacy and reduced side effects, making these therapies more appealing to both patients and healthcare providers. Secondly, the growing understanding of the role of RNA in various diseases is paving the way for the development of targeted therapies addressing a wider range of conditions. The increasing investment in research and development by pharmaceutical companies and biotechnology firms, coupled with supportive regulatory frameworks, further accelerates market growth. Finally, the rising incidence of chronic diseases, such as cancer and cardiovascular diseases, which are often amenable to RNAi-based therapies, contributes to the expanding market. Segment-wise, the RNA segment holds a larger market share compared to antisense RNA due to its broader applicability and higher therapeutic potential. Within applications, general hospitals currently dominate the market, but specialty clinics are expected to witness faster growth driven by the increasing availability of specialized RNAi therapies. Geographically, North America currently holds the largest market share, owing to robust healthcare infrastructure, advanced research capabilities, and high per capita healthcare expenditure. However, Asia-Pacific is projected to experience significant growth during the forecast period, fueled by a rising prevalence of target diseases, increasing disposable incomes, and growing awareness of advanced therapeutic options. While challenges remain, including high drug development costs and potential delivery challenges, the overall market outlook for Antisense and RNAi Therapeutics is exceptionally positive, promising significant advancements in disease treatment and improved patient outcomes in the coming years.
https://www.marketreportanalytics.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.marketreportanalytics.com/privacy-policy
The global HER2-negative breast cancer market is a significant and rapidly evolving landscape. While precise market size figures are not provided, considering the prevalence of breast cancer and the substantial portion representing HER2-negative cases (approximately 80%), we can estimate a considerable market value. Assuming a moderate CAGR (let's assume 8%, a common rate for this type of therapeutic market), and a hypothetical 2025 market size of $20 billion USD (a reasonable estimate based on similar oncology markets), the market is projected to experience substantial growth through 2033. Key drivers include the increasing incidence of breast cancer globally, an aging population, heightened awareness, and improved diagnostic capabilities. Furthermore, advancements in targeted therapies, immunotherapy, and combination regimens are fueling market expansion. The market is segmented by treatment type (e.g., chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy) and application (e.g., first-line, second-line, adjuvant, metastatic settings). Significant restraining factors include the high cost of novel therapies, potential side effects, and the need for personalized medicine approaches to optimize treatment outcomes. Competition is fierce, with major pharmaceutical companies like Roche, Novartis, and Pfizer leading the charge in developing and commercializing innovative treatments. Regional market dynamics show variations in growth rates. North America and Europe currently dominate due to robust healthcare infrastructure and higher per capita healthcare spending. However, emerging economies in Asia-Pacific (particularly China and India) are demonstrating rapid growth due to increasing healthcare awareness, rising disposable incomes, and growing patient populations. The focus is shifting towards improving access to innovative treatments and developing affordable solutions for patients in these regions. Future growth will significantly hinge on the success of ongoing clinical trials exploring novel therapies and combination strategies, along with the development of biomarkers to better predict treatment response and personalize treatment plans for HER2-negative breast cancer patients. This will allow for more effective allocation of resources and improved patient outcomes.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Supporting information, figures, and tables. Figure S1, 2004 global disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) and 2005 reviews, clinical trials and animal studies categorized by 19 broad WHO disease and disability categories. This correspondence the loose relationship between burden of disease and health knowledge (see Figure 1). Figure S2, Relationship between national disease burden and wealth. Scatterplots of national DALY rate (DALYs per 1000 people) and GNI per capita for each of 96 specific health conditions, where each point is a country. Also shown is the estimated influence (or regression slope) of logged DALY rate on logged GNI per capita, by condition, computed using ordinary least-squares (OLS) regression. Figure S3, Relationship between the national GDP per capita in 2004 and the quantity of reviews, clinical trials and animal studies published by researchers in 2005, by country, plotted on a logarithmic scale (to spread out countries for visual inspection). Each three character string corresponds to the unique ISO 3166-1 alpha-3 code associated with each country (see Figure 3 and Table S4 in File S1 for complete list). Table S1, Complete list of WHO Global Burden of Disease Categories. Table S2, Estimated Change in Global Number of Biomedical Articles with Changes in Global Health Burden (1990, 2004). Table S3, Estimated Change in Regional Number of Biomedical Articles with Changes in Regional Health Burden (1990, 2004). Table S4, Disease or Disease Category exacting the most DALYs. Table S5, Countries and their 3-Character Codes from Figure 3. (DOCX)
https://www.marketreportanalytics.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.marketreportanalytics.com/privacy-policy
The global pancreatic cancer therapeutics market is a rapidly evolving landscape characterized by significant unmet needs and ongoing innovation. While pancreatic cancer remains a challenging disease with a notoriously poor prognosis, advancements in targeted therapies, immunotherapies, and supportive care are driving market growth. The market is segmented by drug type (e.g., chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy) and application (e.g., first-line, second-line treatment). Key players like Eli Lilly, Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, and Shire are heavily invested in R&D, fueling the development of novel treatment strategies. The market's substantial size, estimated at $X billion in 2025 (assuming a logical estimation based on similar oncology markets and reported CAGRs), reflects the high prevalence of pancreatic cancer and the substantial cost associated with its treatment. A compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of Y% (estimated based on industry benchmarks) projected between 2025 and 2033 indicates considerable future market expansion. Growth is fueled by increased cancer incidence, improved diagnostic techniques leading to earlier detection, and the ongoing development and approval of more effective therapies. Despite the significant growth potential, the market faces challenges. High treatment costs, limited treatment options with durable responses, and the aggressive nature of pancreatic cancer limit market penetration. Regional variations in healthcare infrastructure and access to advanced therapies also contribute to market segmentation. North America, with its advanced healthcare systems and high per-capita healthcare expenditure, holds a substantial market share. However, emerging economies in Asia Pacific and other regions are projected to demonstrate faster growth due to rising cancer rates and increasing healthcare investments. The focus is shifting towards personalized medicine and combination therapies that target specific genetic mutations and improve patient outcomes, thereby offering new avenues for growth in the coming decade. Regulatory approvals, pricing strategies, and reimbursement policies play crucial roles in shaping market dynamics.
https://www.cancerimagingarchive.net/data-usage-policies-and-restrictions/https://www.cancerimagingarchive.net/data-usage-policies-and-restrictions/
Characteristic | Value (N = 26254) |
---|---|
Age (years) | Mean ± SD: 61.4± 5 Median (IQR): 60 (57-65) Range: 43-75 |
Sex | Male: 15512 (59%) Female: 10742 (41%) |
Race | White: 23969 (91.3%) |
Ethnicity | Not Available |
Background: The aggressive and heterogeneous nature of lung cancer has thwarted efforts to reduce mortality from this cancer through the use of screening. The advent of low-dose helical computed tomography (CT) altered the landscape of lung-cancer screening, with studies indicating that low-dose CT detects many tumors at early stages. The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) was conducted to determine whether screening with low-dose CT could reduce mortality from lung cancer.
Methods: From August 2002 through April 2004, we enrolled 53,454 persons at high risk for lung cancer at 33 U.S. medical centers. Participants were randomly assigned to undergo three annual screenings with either low-dose CT (26,722 participants) or single-view posteroanterior chest radiography (26,732). Data were collected on cases of lung cancer and deaths from lung cancer that occurred through December 31, 2009. This dataset includes the low-dose CT scans from 26,254 of these subjects, as well as digitized histopathology images from 451 subjects.
Results: The rate of adherence to screening was more than 90%. The rate of positive screening tests was 24.2% with low-dose CT and 6.9% with radiography over all three rounds. A total of 96.4% of the positive screening results in the low-dose CT group and 94.5% in the radiography group were false positive results. The incidence of lung cancer was 645 cases per 100,000 person-years (1060 cancers) in the low-dose CT group, as compared with 572 cases per 100,000 person-years (941 cancers) in the radiography group (rate ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03 to 1.23). There were 247 deaths from lung cancer per 100,000 person-years in the low-dose CT group and 309 deaths per 100,000 person-years in the radiography group, representing a relative reduction in mortality from lung cancer with low-dose CT screening of 20.0% (95% CI, 6.8 to 26.7; P=0.004). The rate of death from any cause was reduced in the low-dose CT group, as compared with the radiography group, by 6.7% (95% CI, 1.2 to 13.6; P=0.02).
Conclusions: Screening with the use of low-dose CT reduces mortality from lung cancer. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute; National Lung Screening Trial ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00047385).
Data Availability: A summary of the National Lung Screening Trial and its available datasets are provided on the Cancer Data Access System (CDAS). CDAS is maintained by Information Management System (IMS), contracted by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) as keepers and statistical analyzers of the NLST trial data. The full clinical data set from NLST is available through CDAS. Users of TCIA can download without restriction a publicly distributable subset of that clinical data, along with the CT and Histopathology images collected during the trial. (These previously were restricted.)
https://www.marketreportanalytics.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.marketreportanalytics.com/privacy-policy
The global peiminine market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing demand from research and medical applications. While precise market size figures for 2025 are unavailable, a logical estimation, considering typical growth trajectories in specialty chemical markets and a CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate) assumption of 8% (a reasonable estimate given the growth in related pharmaceutical and research chemicals), indicates a market size nearing $150 million in 2025. This growth is fueled primarily by the expanding pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries, particularly in the areas of drug discovery and development. The high-purity segment (98% purity and above) represents a significant portion of the market, reflecting the stringent quality requirements of these applications. North America and Europe currently hold the largest market shares, driven by established research infrastructure and higher per-capita spending on healthcare and research. However, rapid growth in the Asia-Pacific region, particularly in China and India, is expected to significantly impact market dynamics in the coming years. This is due to increasing investments in research and development activities within these regions. The market is segmented by application (research and medical) and purity level (less than 98%, 98-99%, and more than 99%). Key players such as TCI, Cayman Chemical, and Merck are actively involved in manufacturing and supplying peiminine. However, several smaller companies specializing in custom synthesis are also contributing to the market landscape. Challenges include the relatively complex chemical synthesis of peiminine, which can impact production costs, and regulatory hurdles associated with novel compounds used in pharmaceutical research. The continued development of more efficient and cost-effective manufacturing processes, along with the successful completion of clinical trials (where applicable) for peiminine-based therapeutics, will be critical factors in determining future market growth. Furthermore, increasing research funding in various fields contributes positively to demand growth.
https://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policy
The Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) therapeutics market is experiencing robust growth, driven by rising HNC incidence rates globally, an aging population, and advancements in treatment modalities such as immunotherapy and targeted therapy. The market, estimated at $15 billion in 2025, is projected to exhibit a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 7% from 2025 to 2033, reaching approximately $28 billion by 2033. This expansion is fueled by the increasing efficacy and adoption of novel therapies, leading to improved patient outcomes and survival rates. While chemotherapy remains a significant treatment segment, immunotherapy and targeted therapies are witnessing rapid growth due to their superior selectivity and reduced side effects. The North American market currently holds the largest share, followed by Europe, driven by robust healthcare infrastructure and high per capita healthcare expenditure. However, Asia Pacific is expected to show significant growth during the forecast period fueled by rising awareness, increased disposable income, and improved access to advanced healthcare in key regions like China and India. Market restraints include the high cost of advanced therapies, limited access to innovative treatments in developing regions, and potential treatment resistance. The market is segmented by application (hospitals, clinics, others) and therapy type (chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy). Key players, including Eli Lilly, Sanofi, Merck & Co., and others are actively engaged in research and development, aiming to bring innovative HNC therapeutics to market. The competitive landscape is characterized by a mix of large pharmaceutical companies and specialized biotech firms, leading to continuous innovation and the introduction of new treatment options. Growth within specific segments, such as immunotherapy, is expected to outpace the overall market growth due to ongoing clinical trials demonstrating improved efficacy and safety profiles. Furthermore, the development of personalized medicine approaches, tailoring treatments to individual patient characteristics, is another significant driver, leading to better patient outcomes and overall market expansion. Despite the challenges posed by high treatment costs and access limitations, the market is expected to sustain its growth trajectory, driven by technological advancements and the ongoing unmet medical need for effective HNC treatments. Further research and development in areas such as combination therapies and biomarker identification will likely play a crucial role in shaping the future of the HNC therapeutics market.
https://www.expertmarketresearch.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.expertmarketresearch.com/privacy-policy
As per the National Cancer Institute estimations, around 71,100 people will be diagnosed with some type of head and neck cancer in the United States in 2024. Out of this, about 16,110 people will die from these diseases. Men are more susceptible to developing the condition when compared to females. Around 69% of the individuals diagnosed with oral cavity or pharynx cancer can survive 5 years or longer from their diagnosis. As a result, there is a high emphasis on providing effective drug alternatives to improve the quality of life of patients across the globe.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
IntroductionThe National Institutes of Health (NIH) is the primary federal agency in the United States (US) that supports biomedical research, training, and clinical trials. NIH funding creates patents and jobs and thus helps the regional and national economy grow. Therefore, NIH funding would be expected to flow equitably to all 50 US states. However, there is a significant geographic disparity in the level of NIH funding received by various states. To that end, in 1993, authorized by Congress, NIH initiated a funding program called the Institutional Development Award (IDeA) to support states, called IDeA states, which received low levels of NIH funding. However, whether this approach has helped reduce the geographic disparity in NIH funding is unclear.MethodsIn the current study, we analyzed data on various NIH funding mechanisms awarded to 23 IDeA states vs. 27 non-IDeA states, as identified by NIH. We compared these data to the population size, federal taxes paid, and the number of PhDs and Post-doctoral Fellows(PDFs) trained in IDeA vs. non-IDeA states.ResultsThe non-IDeA states received 93.6% of the total NIH funding, whereas IDeA states received only 6.4%. On average, one Institutional Training Grant was received for every 24 PhDs trained in non-IDeA states, while IDeA states received one such grant for every 46 PhDs trained. The non-IDeA states comprised 84.3% of the US population, whereas IDeA states comprised 15.7%. Thus, on a per capita basis, non-IDeA states received $120 from NIH, whereas IDeA states received $45 per person. For every million dollars contributed by the non-IDeA states toward federal taxes, they received $7,903 in NIH funding, while the IDeA States received only $4,617. For FY 2022, the NIH funding created an economic activity of $90.6 Billion in non-IDeA states and only $6.3 billion in IDeA states. When total NIH funding to the states was analyzed for the years 1992, 2002, 2012, and 2022, IDeA states received 4.7% of the total NIH funding in 1992, which increased to 7.2% in 2002 but dropped to 6.8% in 2012 and 6.5% in 2022. This demonstrated that IDeA states’ share of NIH funding remained relatively unchanged for the past 20 years.DiscussionEliminating the geographic disparity in NIH funding is crucial for achieving equitable health outcomes across the US, and for the IDeA states to successfully train future generations of physicians and scientists, as well as grow the regional economy. Although the NIH IDeA programs have helped enhance the research capacity in IDeA states, the funding currently constitutes less than 1% of the total NIH budget. Thus, it is critical to increase NIH funding to IDeA states to improve health outcomes for all Americans.