A web map used to access tax parcel, boundary, ownership, acreage, survey, zoning and tax information. Errors and Omissions Do Exist.The information provided is for reference only and subject to independent verification. User assumes all responsibility for its use.https://www.fayette-co-oh.com/Fayette County ProfileFayette County is a county located in the U.S. state of Ohio. Its county seat is Washington Court House. Fayette County was formed on March 1, 1810 from portions of Highland County and Ross County. It was named after Marie-Joseph Motier, Marquis de La Fayette, a French general and politician who took the side of the Colonials during the American Revolutionary War and who played an important role in the French Revolution.Fayette County is a part of the Virginia Military survey, which was reserved in 1783, to be allotted to Virginia soldiers. This district includes the entire counties of Adams, Brown, Clermont, Clinton, Highland, Fayette, Madison and Union; and a portion of the counties of Scioto, Pike, Ross, Pickaway, Franklin, Delaware, Marion, Hardin, Logan, Champaign, Clarke, Greene, Warren and Hamilton.Fayette County was formed January 19, 1810 (took effect March 1st) from Ross and Highland counties. Beginning at the southwest corner of Pickaway, running north “with the line of said county to the corner of Madison; thence west with the line of said Madison county to the line of Greene county; thence south with the line of Greene county to the southeast corner thereof; thence east five miles; thence south to the line of Highland county; thence east with said line to Paint Creek; thence in a straight line to the beginning.” All the lower portion was taken from Highland and the upper from Ross.The first portion of land entered within the territory of what is now Fayette county, was a part of original surveys Nos. 243 and 772, lying partly in Clinton county. The first survey lying wholly within Fayette county was No. 463, in what is now Madison township, surveyed for Thomas Overton by John O’Bannon June 30, 1776.The original townships were Jefferson, Greene, Wayne, Madison, Paint and Union. Concord township was formed in April 1818, from Greene. Marion township was formed in June, 1840 from Madison. Perry township was formed June 4, 1845, from Wayne and Greene. Jasper township was formed from Jefferson and Concord December 2, 1845.Washington C.H. was laid out originally on a part of entry 757, which contained 1200 acres and belonged to Benjamin Temple, of Logan county, Kentucky, who donated 150 acres to Fayette county, on condition that it be used as the site of the county seat. The deed of conveyance was made December 1, 1810, by Thomas S. Hind, attorney for Temple, to Robert Stewart, who was appointed by the legislature as director for the town of Washington. The town was laid off some time between December 1, 1810, and February 26, 1811, the latter being the date of the record of the town plat.Bloomingburg (originally called New Lexington) was laid out in 1815, by Solomon Bowers, and originally contained 34 and ¾ acres. On March 4, 1816, Bowers laid out and added twenty more lots. The name of the town was later changed to Bloomingburg by act of the legislature. The town was incorporated by act of the legislature, February 5, 1847.Jeffersonville was laid out March 1, 1831, by Walter B. Write and Chipman Robinson, on 100 acres of land belonging to them, they started selling the lots at $5 each. The town incorporated March 17, 1838. The first house was erected by Robert Wyley.The first railroad, now the C. & M. V., was completed in 1852; the second, now the Detroit Southern, in 1875; the third, now the C.H. & D. in 1879; and the fourth, now the B. & O. S. W., in 1884.The first permanent settler (probably) was a Mr. Wolf who settled in what is now Wayne township, in about the year 1796. - Circa 1886 - Map of Fayette County, Ohio. Issued by the Fayette County Record.

The Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) Database depicts flood risk information and supporting data used to develop the risk data. The primary risk classifications used are the 1-percent-annual-chance flood event, the 0.2-percent-annual- chance flood event, and areas of minimal flood risk. The DFIRM Database is derived from Flood Insurance Studies (FISs), previously published Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), flood hazard analyses performed in support of the FISs and FIRMs, and new mapping data, where available. The FISs and FIRMs are published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The file is georeferenced to earth's surface using the Ohio South Stateplane projection and coordinate system. The specifications for the horizontal control of DFIRM data files are consistent with those required for mapping at scales of 1:6000 and 1:12,000.

This is an interactive map based on the Data Explorer map, for use with the Zoning Update project of 2025.

This is a raster dataset of georeferenced township maps from the General Land Office (GLO) surveys beginning in 1836 through 1859. The source of the georeferenced images is scanned microfilm of plats from the State Archives. These plats represent maps drawn from the original field notes by the Surveyor General's Dubuque office.

Download .zipThis theme is the result of a special analysis combining land use/ land cover interpretted by the remote sensing section with designated prime farmland soil units.

The soils coverage used in this analysis was digitized from the original paper soil survey sheets. These sheets were taped together to form an area covering each of the USGS quadrangle maps in the county. The areas for each quadrangle were then digitized using a run length encoding technique sampling along horizontal lines which represented the midline of cells with a height of 250 feet. The measurement increment along these horizontal lines was one decafoot (10 feet). The quadrangle files were then merged into a county raster based file which was subsequently converted to ARC/INFO format.

The user should bear in mind that this coverage is only an approximation of the original soil survey and should not be used for site specific analysis. Additional details on the digitizing process are available on request.

Original coverage data was converted from the .e00 file to a more standard ESRI shapefile(s) in November 2014.Contact Information:GIS Support, ODNR GIS ServicesOhio Department of Natural ResourcesReal Estate & Land ManagementReal Estate and Lands Management2045 Morse Rd, Bldg I-2Columbus, OH, 43229Telephone: 614-265-6462Email: gis.support@dnr.ohio.gov

Link to the ScienceBase Item Summary page for the item described by this metadata record. Service Protocol: Link to the ScienceBase Item Summary page for the item described by this metadata record. Application Profile: Web Browser. Link Function: information

Link to the ScienceBase Item Summary page for the item described by this metadata record. Service Protocol: Link to the ScienceBase Item Summary page for the item described by this metadata record. Application Profile: Web Browser. Link Function: information

Download .zipA soil mapping unit designates a specific type of soil which has unique charactersitics including texture, slope, and erosion class.

The coverage used in this analysis was digitized from the original paper soil survey sheets. These sheets were taped together to form an area covering each of the USGS quadrangle maps in the county. The areas for each quadrangle were then digitized using a run length encoding technique sampling along horizontal lines which represented the midline of cells with a height of 250 feet. The measurement increment along these horizontal lines was one decafoot (10 feet). The quadrangle files were then merged into a county raster based file which was subsequently converted to ARC/INFO format.

The user should bear in mind that this coverage is only an approximation of the original soil survey and should not be used for site specific analysis. Additional details on the digitizing process are available on request.

Original coverage data was converted from the .e00 file to a more standard ESRI shapefile(s) in November 2014.Contact Information:GIS Support, ODNR GIS ServicesOhio Department of Natural ResourcesReal Estate & Land ManagementReal Estate and Lands Management2045 Morse Rd, Bldg I-2Columbus, OH, 43229Telephone: 614-265-6462Email: gis.support@dnr.ohio.gov

Digital orthophoto quarter quads covering the Little Chazy River watershed are included with the dataset. Original photographs are rectified to a UTM Zone 18 NAD83 map base. Files have a 1 meter pixel ground resolution. DOQQs were created from color infrared imagery, so that vegetation shows up in different shades of red.

This ESRI ArcView 3.x shapefile shows the Agricultural District Boundaries subset for the region immediately surrounding the Little Chazy River Watershed with attribute data. The original data were digitized from 1:24000 maps and were developed by Cornell Institute for Resource Information Systems (Cornell IRIS) and entitled Clinton County Agricultural Districts.

Streams and water bodies were digitized in PC ArcInfo on all or part of six USGS 7.5’ topographic maps within a rectangular study area encompassing the Little Chazy River Watershed in Clinton County, New York. These GIS data have been converted to an ESRI line shapefile and an ESRI polygon shapefile.

Download .zipThis theme was derived by using the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) to calculate estimated ersoion rates from land with conservation tillage. Factors combined by the USLE include: Rainfall factor, erosion factor "K" and slope length and steepness factor. These factors were developed utilizing the digitized soil mapping units for Clinton County. Land use/ land cover interpretation by the remote Sensing Unit was used to exclude developed areas.

The coverage used in this analysis was digitized from the original paper soil survey sheets. These sheets were taped together to form an area covering each of the USGS quadrangle maps in the county. The areas for each quadrangle were then digitized using a run length encoding technique sampling along horizontal lines which represented the midline of cells with a height of 250 feet. The measurement increment along these horizontal lines was one decafoot (10 feet). The quadrangle files were then merged into a county raster based file which was subsequently converted to ARC/INFO format.

The user should bear in mind that this coverage is only an approximation of the original soil survey and should not be used for site specific analysis. Additional details on the digitizing process are available on request.

Original coverage data was converted from the .e00 file to a more standard ESRI shapefile(s) in November 2014.Contact Information:GIS Support, ODNR GIS ServicesOhio Department of Natural ResourcesReal Estate & Land ManagementReal Estate and Lands Management2045 Morse Rd, Bldg I-2Columbus, OH, 43229Telephone: 614-265-6462Email: gis.support@dnr.ohio.gov

This dataset contains the lithologic class and topographic position index information and quality-assurance and quality-control data not available in the online National Water Information System for 54 domestic wells sampled by the U.S. Geological Survey in Clinton County, Pennsylvania, May-September 2017. The topographic position index (TPI) for each well location was computed on the basis of a 25-meter digital elevation model (U.S. Geological Survey, 2009) using criteria reported by Llewellyn (2014) to indicate potential classes for topographic setting. The bedrock geologic unit and primary lithology were determined for each well location on the basis of the digital bedrock geologic map of Pennsylvania (Miles and Whitfield, 2001). The quality-assurance and quality-control data (such as blanks or replicates) were collected at a subset of sites to ensure that the data met specific data-quality objectives outlined for the study.

Download .zipThis theme was derived by using the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) to calculate estimated ersoion rates from land with no-till systems. Factors combined by the USLE include: Rainfall factor, erosion factor "K" and slope length and steepness factor. These factors were developed utilizing the digitized soil mapping units for Clinton County. Land use/ land cover interpretation by the remote Sensing Unit was used to exclude developed areas.

The coverage used in this analysis was digitized from the original paper soil survey sheets. These sheets were taped together to form an area covering each of the USGS quadrangle maps in the county. The areas for each quadrangle were then digitized using a run length encoding technique sampling along horizontal lines which represented the midline of cells with a height of 250 feet. The measurement increment along these horizontal lines was one decafoot (10 feet). The quadrangle files were then merged into a county raster based file which was subsequently converted to ARC/INFO format.

The user should bear in mind that this coverage is only an approximation of the original soil survey and should not be used for site specific analysis. Additional details on the digitizing process are available on request.

Original coverage data was converted from the .e00 file to a more standard ESRI shapefile(s) in November 2014.Contact Information:GIS Support, ODNR GIS ServicesOhio Department of Natural ResourcesReal Estate & Land ManagementReal Estate and Lands Management2045 Morse Rd, Bldg I-2Columbus, OH, 43229Telephone: 614-265-6462Email: gis.support@dnr.ohio.gov

Fault lines were derived from a 1977 map of brittle structures. This ESRI line shapefile is intended to give a general idea of geological fault location and types in the Little Chazy River watershed.

The first map shows county-by-county results in the traditional red and blue colors. From a transportation perspective, one clear takeaway is that you could drive coast-to-coast without ever setting foot in a Clinton County.The second map comes courtesy of the Brookings Institution, and it tells a dramatically different story. While Secretary Clinton carried 2,000 fewer counties than Mr. Trump, her blue counties represent nearly two-thirds of the nation's Gross Domestic Product (GDP).Finally, the third map introduces some nuance to the stark contrast of the two other pictures. It depicts county-by-county results like the first map, but shows the margin of victory in a range of red and blue colors. The most striking thing to me about the third map is how many purple counties there are, where the vote margin was +/-10% for either Trump or Clinton. In other words, our closely divided county once again proved just how closely divided it is.My Christmas wish: that we can start emphasizing the close part more than the divided one.

The SSURGO dataset, from which this shapefile is derived, is the most detailed level of soil geographic data developed by the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Accompanying this file are text files, which provide supplemental information about the soil codes in the shapefile attribute table. This file was subset from a Clinton County-wide ArcInfo coverage created by the Mann Library at Cornell University. This ESRI polygon shapefile is intended to show soil classifications in the region immediately surrounding the Little Chazy River Watershed.

Land cover polygons were delineated on 1985 imagery and transferred to 7.5’ USGS topographic quadrangles. Polygons were digitized and attributed in PC ArcInfo. This file is an ESRI polygon shapefile converted from the ArcInfo coverage.

This web map was created to support reconnaissance of shoreline wetlands around Clinton Lake in Douglas County, Kansas.

This ESRI polygon shapefiele is intended to give a general indication of bedrock types in the watershedBedrock classes were mapped at a scale of 1:250000 for the New York State Education Department, NYS Museum, by NYS Geological Survey. While not an ideal scale for a watershed this size, it can give a general idea of bedrock types.