5 datasets found
  1. a

    NCR Paint Creek Cabin Creek Strike Site

    • nps.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Jun 1, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    National Park Service (2021). NCR Paint Creek Cabin Creek Strike Site [Dataset]. https://nps.hub.arcgis.com/maps/2ebb5cd2359c4224b6f7d1d8158e37f6
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2021
    Dataset authored and provided by
    National Park Service
    Area covered
    Description

    This web map is used in The West Virginia Mine Wars: An American Labor Conflict in Appalachia StoryMap, developed by the National Historic Landmarks (NHL) program and the National Capital Regional Office, National Park Service. The StoryMap covers the coal miners fight for employee rights. From 1912 to 1921, thousands of coal miners in the southern coalfields of West Virginia fought violently against coal company operators to secure their right to unionize and abolish the brutal mine guard system.The research content presented in this National Park Service StoryMap was prepared by Dr. Rachel Donaldson, a labor historian in association with the Organization of American Historians. Dr. Donaldson was a co-author for the National Historic Landmark study of the Jefferson County Courthouse. The original StoryMap was designed and organized by National Capital Region National Historic Landmark Program Intern Max Sickler in 2021. The updated StoryMap was created by Samantha Melvin in January 2024.For full details read the West Virginia Mine Wars series on NPS.gov. The images in this StoryMap are available on NPGallery in the West Virginia Mine Wars Story Map Album.

  2. f

    Surface and Underground Coal Mines in the U.S.

    • geodata.fnai.org
    • geodata.colorado.gov
    • +3more
    Updated Feb 20, 2020
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Esri U.S. Federal Datasets (2020). Surface and Underground Coal Mines in the U.S. [Dataset]. https://geodata.fnai.org/datasets/fedmaps::surface-and-underground-coal-mines-in-the-u-s--2/explore
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 20, 2020
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Esri U.S. Federal Datasets
    Area covered
    Description

    Surface and Underground Coal Mines in the U.S.This feature layer, utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration (EIA), displays all operating surface and underground coal mines in the U.S. by total production in short tons. Per EIA, "Coal is a combustible black or brownish-black sedimentary rock with a high amount of carbon and hydrocarbons. Coal is classified as a nonrenewable energy source because it takes millions of years to form. Coal contains the energy stored by plants that lived hundreds of millions of years ago in swampy forests."Coal is mainly found in three regions: the Appalachian coal region, the Interior coal region, and the Western coal region (includes the Powder River Basin).The Appalachian coal region includes Alabama, Eastern Kentucky, Maryland, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia.The Interior coal region includes Arkansas, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, Texas, and Western Kentucky.The Western coal region includes Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Montana, New Mexico, North Dakota, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming.Gemini Surface MineData currency: This cached Esri service is checked monthly for updates from its federal source (Coal Mines)Data modification: NoneFor more information, please visit: Coal ExplainedFor feedback: ArcGIScomNationalMaps@esri.comEnergy Information AdministrationPer EIA, "The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) collects, analyzes, and disseminates independent and impartial energy information to promote sound policymaking, efficient markets, and public understanding of energy and its interaction with the economy and the environment."

  3. f

    Comparison of results to new permits.

    • figshare.com
    xls
    Updated May 31, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Michael P. Strager; Jacquelyn M. Strager; Jeffrey S. Evans; Judy K. Dunscomb; Brad J. Kreps; Aaron E. Maxwell (2023). Comparison of results to new permits. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128813.t003
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 31, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Michael P. Strager; Jacquelyn M. Strager; Jeffrey S. Evans; Judy K. Dunscomb; Brad J. Kreps; Aaron E. Maxwell
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    For Alabama and West Virginia, detailed summary of mine permits with new/recent activity in relation to Random Forests (RF) model results.Comparison of results to new permits.

  4. Coal Mines

    • chesapeake-conservation-atlas-chescon.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Mar 26, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Chesapeake Conservancy (2018). Coal Mines [Dataset]. https://chesapeake-conservation-atlas-chescon.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/coal-mines
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 26, 2018
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Chesapeake Conservancyhttps://www.chesapeakeconservancy.org/
    Area covered
    Description

    SourceChesapeake Conservation PartnershipLocationPennsylvania, New York, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, and the District of Columbia.DescriptionEnergy is a vital input to supporting our way of life. Yet, energy production and transmission also have the potential to adversely impact values we treasure. Harmonizing our needs with our values requires solid understanding of both conservation goals and existing and proposed energy infrastructure.The map depicts known data related to energy production and infrastructure.Creating the map included acquiring and displaying data on the full range of energy production -- from geologic potential, to areas of resource extraction, energy production, and transmission including both renewable energy and fossil fuels.The map also shows proposed and potential energy projects including potential fracking sites, proposed gas storage sites, proposed gas pipelines, and proposed electric transmission lines.All data is compiled from publicly available sources including the US Energy Information Administration (EIA), the Homeland Infrastructure Foundation-Level Data, state agencies, and non-governmental organizations.In particular, data on potential and proposed projects come from a variety of sources, including non-governmental organizations tracking these projects, agencies regulating the projects and utilities proposing them. This dataset will be the most difficult to keep current across six states with many different entities in charge of the various projects.How you might make use of this data layerThis dataset shares the locations of energy resources and infrastructure. This information may be useful in understanding how infrastructure may influence land conservation and stewardship.How to get more informationFor more information about the Chesapeake Conservation Partnership contact: John Griffin, Program Manager, jgriffin@chesapeakeconservation.org

  5. a

    SW QM Reports

    • conservation-abra.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Feb 22, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Allegheny-Blue Ridge Alliance (2023). SW QM Reports [Dataset]. https://conservation-abra.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/sw-qm-reports
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 22, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Allegheny-Blue Ridge Alliance
    Area covered
    Description

    Purpose:This feature layer describes water quality sampling data performed at several operating coal mines in the South Fork of Cherry watershed, West Virginia.Source & Data:Data was downloaded from WV Department of Environmental Protection's ApplicationXtender online database and EPA's ECHO online database between January and April, 2023.There are five data sets here: Surface Water Monitoring Sites, which contains basic information about monitoring sites (name, lat/long, etc.) and NPDES Outlet Monitoring Sites, which contains similar information about outfall discharges surrounding the active mines. Biological Assessment Stations (BAS) contain similar information for pre-project biological sampling. NOV Summary contains locations of Notices of Violation received by South Fork Coal Company from WV Department of Environmental Protection. The Quarterly Monitoring Reports table contains the sampling data for the Surface Water Monitoring Sites, which actually goes as far back as 2018 for some mines. Parameters of concern include iron, aluminum and selenium, among others.A relationship class between Surface Water Monitoring Sites and the Quarterly Monitoring Reports allows access to individual sample results.Processing:Notices of Violation were obtained from the WV DEP AppXtender database for Mining and Reclamation Article 3 (SMCRA) Permitting, and Mining and Reclamation NPDES Permitting. Violation data were entered into Excel and loaded into ArcGIS Pro as a CSV text file with Lat/Long coordinates for each Violation. The CSV file was converted to a point feature class.Water quality data were downloaded in PDF format from the WVDEP AppXtender website. Non-searchable PDFs were converted via Optical Character Recognition, so that data could be copied. Sample results were copied and pasted manually to Notepad++, and several columns were re-ordered. Data was grouped by sample station and sorted chronologically. Sample data, contained in the associated table (SW_QM_Reports) were linked back to the monitoring station locations using the Station_ID text field in a geodatabase relationship class.Water monitoring station locations were taken from published Drainage Maps and from water quality reports. A CSV table was created with station Lat/Long locations and loaded into ArcGIS Pro. It was then converted to a point feature class.Stream Crossings and Road Construction Areas were digitized as polygon feature classes from project Drainage and Progress maps that were converted to TIFF image format from PDF and georeferenced.The ArcGIS Pro map - South Fork Cherry River Water Quality, was published as a service definition to ArcGIS Online.Symbology:NOV Summary - dark blue, solid pointLost Flats Surface Water Monitoring Sites: Data Available - medium blue point, black outlineLost Flats Surface Water Monitoring Sites: No Data Available - no-fill point, thick medium blue outlineLost Flats NPDES Outlet Monitoring Sites - orange point, black outlineBlue Knob Surface Water Monitoring Sites: Data Available - medium blue point, black outlineBlue Knob Surface Water Monitoring Sites: No Data Available - no-fill point, thick medium blue outlineBlue Knob NPDES Outlet Monitoring Sites - orange point, black outlineBlue Knob Biological Assessment Stations: Data Available - medium green point, black outlineBlue Knob Biological Assessment Stations: No Data Available - no-fill point, thick medium green outlineRocky Run Surface Water Monitoring Sites: Data Available - medium blue point, black outlineRocky Run Surface Water Monitoring Sites: No Data Available - no-fill point, thick medium blue outlineRocky Run NPDES Outlet Monitoring Sites - orange point, black outlineRocky Run Biological Assessment Stations: Data Available - medium green point, black outlineRocky Run Biological Assessment Stations: No Data Available - no-fill point, thick medium green outlineRocky Run Stream Crossings: turquoise blue polygon with red outlineRocky Run Haul Road Construction Areas: dark red (40% transparent) polygon with black outlineHaul Road No 2 Surface Water Monitoring Sites: Data Available - medium blue point, black outlineHaul Road No 2 Surface Water Monitoring Sites: No Data Available - no-fill point, thick medium blue outlineHaul Road No 2 NPDES Outlet Monitoring Sites - orange point, black outline

  6. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
National Park Service (2021). NCR Paint Creek Cabin Creek Strike Site [Dataset]. https://nps.hub.arcgis.com/maps/2ebb5cd2359c4224b6f7d1d8158e37f6

NCR Paint Creek Cabin Creek Strike Site

Explore at:
Dataset updated
Jun 1, 2021
Dataset authored and provided by
National Park Service
Area covered
Description

This web map is used in The West Virginia Mine Wars: An American Labor Conflict in Appalachia StoryMap, developed by the National Historic Landmarks (NHL) program and the National Capital Regional Office, National Park Service. The StoryMap covers the coal miners fight for employee rights. From 1912 to 1921, thousands of coal miners in the southern coalfields of West Virginia fought violently against coal company operators to secure their right to unionize and abolish the brutal mine guard system.The research content presented in this National Park Service StoryMap was prepared by Dr. Rachel Donaldson, a labor historian in association with the Organization of American Historians. Dr. Donaldson was a co-author for the National Historic Landmark study of the Jefferson County Courthouse. The original StoryMap was designed and organized by National Capital Region National Historic Landmark Program Intern Max Sickler in 2021. The updated StoryMap was created by Samantha Melvin in January 2024.For full details read the West Virginia Mine Wars series on NPS.gov. The images in this StoryMap are available on NPGallery in the West Virginia Mine Wars Story Map Album.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu