GIS Map view look up parcel information including owner, taxes, market value and more.Important Mailing Label Information:The "Mailing Labels" button is is copy of the Parcels Layer and is intended to be turned OFF on the map, and is there just for the "Public Notification" Widget. This widget obtains information on the pop-up of a selected layer to create "Mailing Labels." This said, this layer contains the Owners Mailing Address information. Below is Arcaded used to customize the pop-up:Made three custom Arcade Lines below: Proper($feature["OWNER_NAM1"]) + Proper($feature["OWNER_NAM2"])Proper($feature["OWNER_ADDR"])Proper($feature["OWNER_CITY"]) + ',' + $feature["OWNER_STAT"] + ',' + $feature["OWNER_ZIP"]Below is the custom pop-up:{expression/expr0}{expression/expr1}{expression/expr2}
Cobb County Streams and Lakes
Refer to the status of each trail to determine if it is complete, or in the construction phase. This does not include Federal Park trails such as Kennesaw Mountain.
10.2.2 12/18/14
The subdivision polygon layer displays phases and subsections for developments, apartment complexes, mobile home parks, and platted subdivisions with the city limits of Kennesaw. This polygon layer contains the following data (fields): NAME, PHASE, Plat Book, Plat Book Page Number, platUNC, PLAT RECORDED ON, and PLAT TYPE. The NAME fields display the name of the development, apartment complex, mobile home park, or platted subdivision. The PHASE field displays the phase of the development, apartment complex, mobile home park, or platted subdivision (ex. P-1, P-2, and P-3). The Plat Book field is the book in which the plat was recorded at the Cobb County Clerk of Superior Court. The Plat Book Page Number field is the page of the book that the plat was recorded at the Cobb County Clerk of Superior Court. The platUNC field is a link to a digital copy of the plat on the Cobb County Clerk of Superior Court website. The PLAT RECORDED ON field is the date the plat was recorded. The YEAR RECORDED field is the year that the plat was recorded on. The PLAT TYPE field field displays the type of plat the development, apartment complex, mobile home park, or platted subdivision is (ex. single family subdivision, commercial, and mobile home park).
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This layer was developed by the Research & Analytics Division of the Atlanta Regional Commission to show generalized land cover for regional planning with a land use component used for forecasts and modeling at ARC.LandPro2012 should not be taken out of its regional context, though county-level or municipal-level analysis may be useful for transportation, environmental and land use planning. LandPro2012 is ARC's land use/land cover GIS database for the 21-county Atlanta Region (Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, DeKalb, Douglas, Fayette, Fulton, Gwinnett, Henry, Rockdale, the EPA non-attainment (8hr standard) counties of Carroll, Coweta, Barrow, Bartow, Forsyth, Hall, Newton, Paulding, Spalding and Walton and Dawson which will become a part of the 2010 Urbanized Area). LandPro2012 was created by on-screen photo-interpretation and digitizing of ortho-rectified aerial photography. The primary source for this GIS database were the local parcels and the 2009 true color imagery with 1.64-foot pixel resolution, provided by Aerials Express, Inc. 2010 is the first year we have used parcel data to help more accurately delineate the LandPro categories.For ArcGIS 10 users: See full metadata by enabling FGDC metadata in ArcCatalog Customize > ArcCatalog Options > Metadata (tab)Though the terms are often used interchangeably, land use and land cover are not synonymous. Land cover generally refers to the natural or cultivated vegetation, rock, or water covering the land, as well as the developed surface which can be identified on aerial photography. Land use generally refers to the way that humans use or will use the land, regardless of its apparent land cover. Collateral data for the land cover mapping effort included the Aero Surveys of Georgia street atlas, the Georgia Department of Community Affairs (DCA) Community Facilities database and the USGS Digital Raster Graphics (DRGs) of 1:24,000 scale topographic maps. The land use component of this database was added after the land cover interpretation was completed, and is based primarily on ownership information provided by the 21 counties and the City of Atlanta for larger tracts of undeveloped land that meet the land use definition of "Extensive Institutional" or "Park Lands" (refer to the Code Descriptions and Discussion section below). Although some of the boundaries of these tracts may align with visible features from the aerial photography, these areas are generally "non-photo-identifiable," thus require other sources for accurate identification. The land use/cover classification system is adapted from the USGS (Anderson) classification system, incorporating a mix of level I, II and III classes. There are a total of 25 categories in ARC's land use/cover system (described below), 2 of which are used only for land use designations: Park Lands (Code 175) and Extensive Institutional (Code 125). The other 23 categories can describe land use and/or land cover, and in most cases will be the same. The LU code will differ from the LC code only where the Park Lands (Code 175) and Extensive Institutional (Code 125) land holdings have been identified from collateral sources of land ownership.Although similar to previous eras of ARC land use/cover databases developed before 1999 (1995, 1990 etc.), "LandPro" differs in many significant ways. Originally, ARC's land use and land cover database was built from 1975 data compiled by USGS at scales of 1:100,000 and selectively, 1:24,000. The coverage was updated in 1990 using SPOT satellite imagery and low-altitude aerial photography and again in 1995 using 1:24,000 scale panchromatic aerial photography. Unlike these previous 5-year updates, the 1999, 2001, 2003, 2005 2007, 2008 and 2009 LandPro databases were compiled at a larger scale (1:14,000) and do not directly reflect pre-1999 delineations. In addition, all components of LandPro were produced using digital orthophotos for on-screen photo-interpretation and digitizing, thus eliminating the use of unrectified photography and the need for data transfer and board digitizing. As a result, the positional accuracy of LandPro is much higher than in previous eras. There have also been some changes to the classification system prior to 1999. Previously, three categories of Forest (41-deciduous, 42-coniferous, and 43-mixed forest) were used; this version does not distinguish between coniferous and deciduous forest, thus Code 40 is used to simply designate Forest. Likewise, two categories of Wetlands (61-forested wetland, and 62-non-forested wetland) were used before; this version does not distinguish between forested and non-forested wetlands, thus Code 60 is used to simply designate Wetlands. With regard to Wetlands, the boundaries themselves are now based on the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) delineations along with the CIR imagery. Furthermore, Code 51 has been renamed "Rivers" from "Streams and Canals" and represents the Chattahoochee and Etowah Rivers which have been identified in the land use/cover database. In addition to these changes, Code 52 has been dropped from the system as there are no known instances of naturally occurring lakes in the Region. Finally, the land use code for Park Lands has been changed from 173 to 175 so as to minimize confusion with the Parks land cover code, 173. There has been a change in the agriculture classification for LandPro2005 and any LandPro datasets hereafter. Previously, four categories of agriculture (21- agriculture-cropland and pasture, 22 - agriculture - orchards, 23 - agriculture - confined feeding operations and 24 - agriculture - other) were used; this version does not distinguish between the different agricultural lands. Code 20 is now used to designate agriculture. Due to new technology and the enhancements to this database, direct comparison between LandPro99, LandPro2001, LandPro2003 and landPro2005 and all successive updates are now possible, with the 1999 database serving as ARC's new baseline. Please note that as a result of the 2003 mapping effort, LandPro2001 has been adjusted for better comparison to LandPro2003 and is named "LandPro01_adj." Likewise, LandPro99 was previously adjusted when LandPro2001 was completed, but was not further adjusted following the 2003 update. Although some adjustments were originally made to the 1995 land use/cover database for modeling applications, direct comparisons to previous versions of ARC land use/cover before 1999 should be avoided in most cases.The 2010 update has moved away from using the (1:14,000) scale, as will any future updates. Due to the use of local parcels, we have begun to snap LandPro boundaries to the parcel data, making a more accurate dataset. The major change in this update was to make residential areas reflect modern zoning codes more closely. Due to these changes you will no longer be able to compare this dataset to previous years. High density (113) has changed from lots below .25 to lots .25 and smaller. Medium density (112) has changed from .25 to 2 acre lots, to .26 to 1 acre lots. Low density has changed from 2 to 5 acre lots to 1.1 to 2 acre lots. It must be noted that in the 2010 update, you still have old acreage standards reflected in the low density. This will be corrected in the 2011 and 2012 updates. The main focus of the 2010 update was to make sure the LandPro' residential areas reflected the local parcels and change LandPro based on the parcel acreage. DeKalb is the only county not corrected at this time because no parcels were available. The future updates will consist of but are not limited to, reclassifying areas in 111 that do not meet the new acreage standards, delineating and reclassifying Cell Towers, substations and transmission lines/power cuts from TCU (14) to a subset of this (142), reclassifying airports as 141 form TCU, and reclassifying landfills form urban other (17) to 174. Other changes are delineating more roads other than just Limited Access Highways, making sure parks match the already existing Land use parks layer, and beginning to differentiate office from commercial and commercial/industrial.Classification System:111: Low Density Single Family Residential - Houses on 1.1 - 2 acre lots. Though 2010 still reflects the old standard of lots up to 5 acres.112: Medium Density Single Family Residential - These areas usually occur in urban or suburban zones and are generally characterized by houses on .26 to 1 acre lots. This category accounts for the majority of residential land use in the Region and includes a wide variety of neighborhood types.113: High Density Residential - Areas that have predominantly been developed for concentrated single family residential use. These areas occur almost exclusively in urban neighborhoods with streets on a grid network, and are characterized by houses on lots .25 acre or smaller but may also include mixed residential areas with duplexes and small apartment buildings.117: Multifamily Residential - Residential areas comprised predominantly of apartment, condominium and townhouse complexes where net density generally exceeds eight units per acre. Typical apartment buildings are relatively easy to identify, but some high rise structures may be interpreted as, or combined with, office buildings, though many of these dwellings were identified and delineated in downtown and midtown for the first time with the 2003 update. Likewise, some smaller apartments and townhouses may be interpreted as, or combined with, medium- or high-density single family residential. Housing on military bases, campuses, resorts, agricultural properties and construction work sites is not included in this or other residential categories.119: Mobile Home Parks - Areas that have been developed for single family mobile home use. These residential areas may occur in urban, suburban, or rural zones throughout the Region, with or without a significant mix of forested land cover. Due to their sparse distribution, individual mobile homes are
Cobb Commissioner Districts. Based on State of GA HB-1256/HD-00046
Cobb County Historic Sites Driving Tour: Story MapWelcome to Historic Cobb County. Located in the rapidly growing metropolitan Atlanta Region, Cobb County has numerous historic buildings and sites. This Story Map highlights historic areas in 6 cities along with unincorporated Cobb County. The "Tour" consists of three separate routes that takes the traveler throughout historic Cobb County. In Cobb County, there are 41 sites and 13 districts that are listed in the National Register and/or the Cobb Register. These include Zion Baptist Church, which dates back to 1866 and is the oldest black Baptist Church building in the county and “The General,” the famed locomotive house in the Southern Museum of Civil War and Locomotive History in Kennesaw. Another of the county’s historic sites is the Andrew J. Cheney-Newcomer House. This Greek Revival house was built around 1856 and survived the Civil War due to its use by Federal troops as a headquarters building. The Cobb County Register of Historic Places lists thirteen sites and two districts. The Concord Covered Bridge Historic District contains four houses, a railroad trestle bridge and the ruins of the Concord Woolen Mill by Nickajack Creek. The Historic Preservation Commission holds regular meetings open to the public on the second Monday of each month. The meetings are held at 6:00 pm at the Cobb County building located at 100 Cherokee Street in Marietta. http://cobbcounty.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=811&Itemid=773
This feature class contains detailed line work supporting Sauk Counties road network and contains street name, classification, and address range attributes.This feature service contains copies of the Road Centerline feature class displaying only Town (RoadCenterline - TOWN) and Municipal (RoadCenterline - MUNI) Roads. These copies are used for cartographic reasons. Please use the feature class called RoadCenterline.shp.FROMLEFT - Lowest address range on left side of the roadTOLEFT - Highest address range on left side of the roadFROMRIGHT - Lowest address range on right side of the roadTORIGHT - Highest address range on right side of the roadROADPREDIR - Road Prefix DirectionROADNAME - Base Road NameROADTYPE - Road TypeROADPOSTDIR - Road Post DirectionFULLNAME - The full name of the road including any prefix and/or suffix in mixed case format for Esri Community Map contributorsALTROADNAME - Alternate Road NameALTROADNAME2 - Second Alternate Road NameFEDROUTE - The federal route nameAFEDRTE - The alternate federal route nameSTROUTE - The state route nameASTRTE -The alternate state route nameASTRTE2 - Second Alternate State RouteCTYROUTE - The county route nameACTYRTE - Alternate County RouteCFCCCODE - Census Feature Classification Code for roadROADCLASS - Functional classification of roads based on type of serviceTYPE - Used to support Sauk Counties symbolization of road network in mapping products.STATUSDeveloped - Current in use road network Undeveloped - Platted roads that have not been developed. Planned - Platted roads that we believe will one day be developed. Retired - Road that have been retired Developed-Outliers - Roads outside Sauk County extent.LASTUPDATE - The date the feature was last updated in the maintenance databaseMSAGLEFT - The MSAG community on left side of the roadMSAGRIGHT - The MSAG community on right side of the roadMUNILEFT - Municipal name on left side of the roadMUNIRIGHT - Municipal name on right side of the roadZIPLEFT - Zip code on left side of the roadZIPRIGHT - Zip code on right side of the roadESNLEFT - The ESN on left side of the roadESNRIGHT - The ESN on right side of the roadFIRENUMBERROADNAME - Populated in cases were the Fire Number road name does not match the current road nameMSAGROADPREDIR - MSAG Road Prefix Direction supports a standards used by the E911 applicationMSAGROADNAME - MSAG Road Name supports a standards used by the E911 applicationMSAGROADTYPE - MSAG Road Type supports a standards used by the E911 applicationMSAGROADPOSTDIR - MSAG Road Post Direction supports a standards used by the E911 applicationMSAGFULLNAME - MSAG Full Road Name supports a standards used by the E911 applicationMSAGFROMLEFT - Lowest MSAG address range on left side of the road. These ranges support entire ranges of a block, not the actual range.MSAGTOLEFT - Hightest MSAG address range on left side of the road. These ranges support entire ranges of a block, not the actual rangeMSAGFROMRIGHT - Lowest MSAG address range on right side of the road. These ranges support entire ranges of a block, not the actual rangeMSAGTORIGHT - Highest MSAG address range on right side of the road. These ranges support entire ranges of a block, not the actual rangeContact Information:Joe Fleischmann (GIS Coordinator)Sauk County Land Information\GISWest Square Building505 Broadway St., Baraboo WI, 53913jfleischmann@co.sauk.wi.usphone: 608.355.3570 8:00am - 4:30pm Monday - FridayAdditional Contact Persons:Kelly Felton (Cartographer/LIO) (608)355-3240 kfelton@co.sauk.wi.usSally Cobb (GIS Specialist) (608)355-3562 scobb@co.sauk.wi.usSpatial ReferenceGeographic coordinate reference GCS_North_American_1983_HARNProjection NAD_1983_HARN_WISCRS_Sauk_County_Feet
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This layer was developed by the Research & Analytics Division of the Atlanta Regional Commission and is a generalized landcover database designed for Regional Planning. Although it has a landuse component which is used for forecasts and modeling at ARC, outside users should be aware that the landcover and landuse delineations are based on photo-interpretation of a 5-acre and 25-acre minimum mapping unit respectively, not parcels. Likewise, LandPro2007 should not be taken out of its Regional context, though county-level or municipal-level analysis may be useful for transportation, environmental and landuse planning. LandPro2007 is ARC's landuse/landcover GIS database for the 20-county Atlanta Region (Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, DeKalb, Douglas, Fayette, Fulton, Gwinnett, Henry, Rockdale, the EPA non-attainment (1hr standard) counties of Forsyth, Paulding and Coweta. and the EPA non-attainment (8hr standard) counties of Carroll, Barrow, Bartow, Hall, Newton, Spalding and Walton). LandPro2005 was created by on-screen photo-interpretation and digitizing of ortho-rectified aerial photography at a scale of 1:14,000. The primary source for this GIS database was 2007 true color imagery with 1.64-foot pixel resolution, provided by Aerials Express, Inc.Though the terms are often used interchangeably, landuse and landcover are not synonymous. Landcover generally refers to the natural or cultivated vegetation, rock, or water covering the land, as well as the developed surface which can be identified on aerial photography. Landuse generally refers to the way that humans use or will use the land, regardless of its apparent landcover. Collateral data for the landcover mapping effort included the Aero Surveys of Georgia street atlas, the Georgia Department of Community Affairs (DCA) Community Facilities database and the USGS Digital Raster Graphics (DRGs) of 1:24,000 scale topographic maps. The landuse component of this database was added after the landcover interpretation was completed, and is based primarily on ownership information provided by the 20 counties and the City of Atlanta for larger tracts of undeveloped land that meet the landuse definition of "Extensive Institutional" or "Park Lands" (refer to the Code Descriptions and Discussion section below). Although some of the boundaries of these tracts may align with visible features from the aerial photography, these areas are generally "non-photo-identifiable," thus require other sources for accurate identification. The minimum mapping unit standard for this database is generally 5 acres, with varying exceptions based on category and context. Some smaller Intensive Institutional (mostly elementary schools), Commercial, Cemeteries, and Reservoirs (impoundments) have been intentionally delineated in some cases throughout the Region. Within the downtown and midtown areas, many small polygons of multi-family residential have been identified and added with the 2003 update and expanded upon in the 2005 and in the 2007 update through research of mostly web-based resources. Within single-family neighborhoods, differentiation of adjacent residential areas (111-low density, 112-medium density, and 113-high density) is generally 25 acres, and within agricultural areas, delineation of some forested areas (Code 40) is occasionally larger. 25 acres is also the minimum mapping consideration for the landuse categories of Extensive Institutional (Code 125) and Park Lands (Code 175). The landuse/cover classification system is adapted from the USGS (Anderson) classification system, incorporating a mix of level I, II and III classes. There are a total of 25 categories in ARC's landuse/cover system (described below), 2 of which are used only for landuse designations: Park Lands (Code 175) and Extensive Institutional (Code 125). The other 23 categories can describe landuse and/or landcover, and in most cases will be the same. The LU code will differ from the LC code only where the Park Lands (Code 175) and Extensive Institutional (Code 125) land holdings have been identified from collateral sources of land ownership.Although similar to previous eras of ARC landuse/cover databases developed before 1999 (1995, 1990 etc.), "LandPro" differs in many significant ways. Originally, ARC's landuse and landcover database was built from 1975 data complied by USGS at scales of 1:100,000 and selectively, 1:24,000. The coverage was updated in 1990 using SPOT satellite imagery and low-altitude aerial photography and again in 1995 using 1:24,000 scale panchromatic aerial photography. Unlike these previous 5-year updates, the 1999, 2001, 2003, 2005 and now 2007 LandPro databases were compiled at a larger scale (1:14,000) and do not directly reflect pre-1999 delineations. In addition, all components of LandPro were produced using digital orthophotos for on-screen photo-interpretation and digitizing, thus eliminating the use of unrectified photography and the need for data transfer and board digitizing. As a result, the positional accuracy of LandPro is much higher than in previous eras. There have also been some changes to the classification system prior to 1999. Previously, three categories of Forest (41-deciduous, 42-coniferous, and 43-mixed forest) were used; this version does not distinguish between coniferous and deciduous forest, thus Code 40 is used to simply designate Forest. Likewise, two categories of Wetlands (61-forested wetland, and 62-non-forested wetland) were used before; this version does not distinguish between forested and non-forested wetlands, thus Code 60 is used to simply designate Wetlands. With regard to Wetlands, the boundaries themselves are now based on the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) delineations along with the CIR imagery. Furthermore, Code 51 has been renamed "Rivers" from "Streams and Canals" and represents the Chattahoochee and Etowah Rivers which have been identified in the landuse/cover database. In addition to these changes, Code 52 has been dropped from the system as there are no known instances of naturally occurring lakes in the Region. Finally, the landuse code for Park Lands has been changed from 173 to 175 so as to minimize confusion with the Parks landcover code, 173. There has been a change in the agriculture classification for LandPro2005 and any LandPro datasets hereafter. Previously, four catagories of agriculture (21- agriculture-cropland and pasture, 22 - agriculture - orchards, 23 - agriculture - confined feeding operations and 24 - agriculture - other) were used; this version does not distinguish between the different agricultural lands. Code 20 is now used to designate agriclture. Due to new technology and the enhancements to this database, direct comparison between LandPro99, LandPro2001, LandPro2003 and landPro2005 is now possible, with the 1999 database serving as ARC's new baseline. Please note that as a result of the 2003 mapping effort, LandPro2001 has been adjusted for better comparison to LandPro2003 and is named "LandPro01_adj." Lilkewise, LandPro99 was previously adjusted when LandPro2001 was completed, but was not further adjusted following the 2003 update. Although some adjustments were originally made to the 1995 landuse/cover database for modeling applications, direct comparisons to previous versions of ARC landuse/cover before 1999 should be avoided in most cases.
Classification System:
111: Low Density Single Family Residential - Areas that have generally been developed for single family residential use, usually with a significant mix of forested or agricultural landcover. These areas often occur on the periphery of urban expansion and are generally characterized by houses on 2 to 5 acre lots. Some examples of this category include rural housing, estates, and linear residential developments along transportation routes.
112: Medium Density Single Family Residential - Areas that have predominantly been developed for single family residential use, with or without a significant mix of forested or agricultural landcover. These areas usually occur in urban or suburban zones and are generally characterized by houses on 1/4 to 2 acre lots. This category accounts for the majority of residential landuse in the Region and includes a wide variety of neighborhood types.
113: High Density Residential - Areas that have predominantly been developed for concentrated single family residential use. These areas occur almost exclusively in urban neighborhoods with streets on a grid network, and are characterized by houses on lots smaller than 1/4 acre, but may also include mixed residential areas with duplexes and small apartment buildings.
117: Multifamily Residential - Residential areas comprised predominantly of apartment, condominium and townhouse complexes where net density generally exceeds eight units per acre. Typical apartment buildings are relatively easy to identify, but some high rise structures may be interpreted as, or combined with, office buildings, though many of these dwellings were identified and delineated in downtown and midtown for the first time with the 2003 update. Likewise, some smaller apartments and townhouses may be interpreted as, or combined with, medium- or high-density single family residential. Housing on military bases, campuses, resorts, agricultural properties and construction work sites is not included in this or other residential categories.
119: Mobile Home Parks - Areas that have been developed for single family mobile home use. These residential areas may occur in urban, suburban, or rural zones throughout the Region, with or without a significant mix of forested landcover. Due to their sparse distribution, individual mobile homes are generally mapped with the Forest landcover (Code 40) and Low- or
Not seeing a result you expected?
Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.
GIS Map view look up parcel information including owner, taxes, market value and more.Important Mailing Label Information:The "Mailing Labels" button is is copy of the Parcels Layer and is intended to be turned OFF on the map, and is there just for the "Public Notification" Widget. This widget obtains information on the pop-up of a selected layer to create "Mailing Labels." This said, this layer contains the Owners Mailing Address information. Below is Arcaded used to customize the pop-up:Made three custom Arcade Lines below: Proper($feature["OWNER_NAM1"]) + Proper($feature["OWNER_NAM2"])Proper($feature["OWNER_ADDR"])Proper($feature["OWNER_CITY"]) + ',' + $feature["OWNER_STAT"] + ',' + $feature["OWNER_ZIP"]Below is the custom pop-up:{expression/expr0}{expression/expr1}{expression/expr2}