Cochise County parcels showing tax information. This layer is updated weekly.For more information please contact Cochise County GIS

Available Tax Lien parcels within Cochise County.For more information please contact Cochise County Treasurer

Cochise County Interactive Mapping Application. This application is a work in progress and new data and tools will be added over time. Check back often for updates!For any questions, concerns, or recommendations please contact Cochise County GIS

Geospatial data about Cochise County, Arizona Parcels. Export to CAD, GIS, PDF, CSV and access via API.

The TIGER/Line Files are shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) that are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line File is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. The All Roads Shapefile includes all features within the MTDB Super Class "Road/Path Features" distinguished where the MAF/TIGER Feature Classification Code (MTFCC) for the feature in MTDB tha begin with "S". This includes all primary, secondary, local neighborhood, and rural roads, city streets, vehicular trails (4wd), ramps, service drives, alleys, parking lot roads, private roads for service vehicles (logging, oil fields, ranches, etc.), bike paths or trails, bridle/horse paths, walkways/pedestrian trails, and stairways.

Cochise Count Special Tax Districts. This layer is updated on a very infrequent basis.For more information please contact Special Districts

Cochise County Incorporated Limits. This layer is updated on an infrequent basis. For more information please contact Cochise County GIS

A paper copy of the Geologic Map of the Catalina Core Complex and San Pedro Trough (Dickinson, 1992) was scanned and digitized by U.S. Geological Survey staff and contractors at the Southwest Field Office (Tucson, AZ) in 2000-2001 for input into an ArcInfo geographic information system (GIS). The resulting geologic map database (in ArcInfo format) can be queried in many ways to produce a variety of geologic maps. Digital base map data files. (topography, roadways, towns, and hydrography) are not included: they may be obtained from a variety of commercial and government sources. Geologic map graphics and plot files that are provided in the Open-File Report are representations of the digital database and are not designed to be cartographic products.

Both Lnd_SectionCorner and NS_Lnd_SectionCornerDoc tables are related using the ID1 field.

Cochise County road center lines. This layer is updated on an infrequent basis. For more information please contact Cochise County GIS

This layer is parcel geometry with a reference note only. For a more rich parcel layer please see "Cad_Parcel_TaxInfo"

County maintained roads in Cochise County. This layer is updated on an infrequent basis.For more information please contact Cochise County Engineering & Natural Resources

This map displays the Cochise County Board of Supervisor districts.

Cochise County Zoning areas. This layer is updated on an infrequent basis. For more information please contact Cochise County Development Services For more information about zoning please go here Summary of Zoning Districts

Facility locations within Cochise County. These layers are updated on an infrequent basis. For more information please contact Cochise County GIS

Cochise County mile posts. This layer is updated on an infrequent basis. For more information please contact Cochise County Engineering & Natural Resources

Groundwater recharge properties feature represents various properties within Cochise County as part of the Cochise Conservation and Recharge Network (CCRN). For questions regarding this information, please contact Cochise County, Engineering and Natural Resource Department

Cochise County election precincts updated in 2022 based on County Board of Supervisor Resolution 22-03 filed in the office of the County Recorder under recording instrument number 2022-06041. This layer is updated on an infrequent basis.

Plan submitted by: AriBradshaw on 10/20/2021 USER DESCRIPTION: Gave Graham and Greenlee to D2. Gave all of San Tan to D5 and spiralled from there. Gave all of the radically different part of downtown to D1 from D3. USER PLAN OBJECTIVE: Dear Commission, Mappers, Lawyers, and Public:

This map differs from the adopted 5.0 Map in the following ways:

Each district is equal in population.

We have added all of Colorado City and Wickenburg from D9 to D2. We have added the Biltmore/Arcadia-influenced "new Downtown" where First Friday occurs to D1 from D3.

We have added all of San Tan Valley together in D5. This area does not belong in D2 at all. By adding all of San Tan to D5 and by honoring the VRA in D3, D4 is forced to extend further into the East Valley. This means that it has around 50-70k overpopulation if it continues to include land North of the river. For this reason, the natives are united with the Ft. McDowell natives and Scottsdale is united together from D4 to D1.

We have united the Sun Cities together in D9.

The VRA D7 was made more conducive to the VRA by trading parts of Tucson, Yuma (city), and Maricopa (county) with various districts.Pinal's divisions need to make sense if Pinal is to be divided. Florence and Coolidge must go together. Apache Junction and San Tan must go together. Maricopa and Casa Grande should go together - though are more separable than the others. The southernmost part around Red Rock and Saddlebrook ought to be included in D5 no matter what. We understand the commission's hesitation to have an "arm" sticking out from D5, but we feel that these exurban cities have much much much more in common with Tucson than they do with a rural district such as D2 or the Latino VRA-oriented district such as D9. We urge the commission to strongly consider these points considering Pinal County.

We have added Graham and Greenlee Counties to D2. There is no logical reason why these should be included into a southern district. The mining communities of Greenlee County should not have their small voices diluted even further by urban populations. Additionally, the rural lifestyles along the valley in Graham county are much more akin to those in southern Apache and Navajo than in Pima or Santa Cruz.

We understand the hesitation to even consider adding parts of Cochise to D2. However, when faced with the alternatives, no option best respects the populations of towns like Benson or Wilcox as giving them to a rural district like D2. Giving them to D5 effectively nullifies their voice while D2 must take from an urban area instead. We would rather sacrifice appearance of contiguousness for the sake of the voice of the rural communities along the I10 in Cochise County.

We have added Gold Canyon to D5 from D2. However, for population rebalancing in the Phoenix area, we understand if you return it to D2.

Finally, we have added a portion of D8 south of Cave Creek to D1. This community was split down the middle by an arbitrary diagonal so we attempted to balance it.

Thank you so much to the Commission, Mapping Team, Lawyers, and AZ public for your work and dedication to the State of Arizona. God Bless.