Cochise County parcels showing tax information. This layer is updated weekly.For more information please contact Cochise County GIS

Available Tax Lien parcels within Cochise County.For more information please contact Cochise County Treasurer

Cochise County Interactive Mapping Application. This application is a work in progress and new data and tools will be added over time. Check back often for updates!For any questions, concerns, or recommendations please contact Cochise County GIS

The TIGER/Line Files are shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) that are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line File is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. Edge refers to the linear topological primitives that make up MTDB. The All Lines Shapefile contains linear features such as roads, railroads, and hydrography. Additional attribute data associated with the linear features found in the All Lines Shapefile are available in relationship (.dbf) files that users must download separately. The All Lines Shapefile contains the geometry and attributes of each topological primitive edge. Each edge has a unique TIGER/Line identifier (TLID) value.

Facility locations within Cochise County. These layers are updated on an infrequent basis. For more information please contact Cochise County GIS

This map displays the Cochise County Board of Supervisor districts.

A paper copy of the Geologic Map of the Catalina Core Complex and San Pedro Trough (Dickinson, 1992) was scanned and digitized by U.S. Geological Survey staff and contractors at the Southwest Field Office (Tucson, AZ) in 2000-2001 for input into an ArcInfo geographic information system (GIS). The resulting geologic map database (in ArcInfo format) can be queried in many ways to produce a variety of geologic maps. Digital base map data files. (topography, roadways, towns, and hydrography) are not included: they may be obtained from a variety of commercial and government sources. Geologic map graphics and plot files that are provided in the Open-File Report are representations of the digital database and are not designed to be cartographic products.

Facility locations within Cochise County. These layers are updated on an infrequent basis. For more information please contact Cochise County GIS

This dataset consists of a shapefile representing 50 foot contour intervals for Santa Cruz County, Arizona. Datasets are also available for 100', 250', and 500' intervals. Each file covers an Arizona county or part of a county and as a collection covers the entire state. The data were created by processing hillshade TIF files derived from the U.S. Geological Survey National Elevation Dataset. The processing produced ESRI formatted coverages for each county or part of a county. The U.S. Geological Survey has developed a National Elevation Dataset (NED). The NED is a seamless mosaic of best-available elevation data. The 7.5-minute elevation data for the conterminous United States are the primary initial source data. In addition to the availability of complete 7.5-minute data, efficient processing methods were developed to filter production artifacts in the existing data, convert to the NAD83 datum, edge-match, and fill slivers of missing data at quadrangle seams. One of the effects of the NED processing steps is a much-improved base of elevation data for calculating slope and hydrologic derivatives. The specifications for the NED 1 arc second and 1/3 arc second data are - Geographic coordinate system, Horizontal datum of NAD83, except for AK which is NAD27, Vertical datum of NAVD88, except for AK which is NAVD29, Z units of meters.

Plan submitted by: AZ71@22 on 10/22/2021 USER DESCRIPTION: This map better defines southern AZ regionally and logically. USER PLAN OBJECTIVE: This map fixes Southern AZ. Tanque Verde SHOULD NOT be associated with Marana and Oro Valley. This map includes Oracle, San Manuel and Mammoth in D17. But it expands D18 to include Tanque Verde Region and keeps Summerhaven in D18 (since the only way to access it is through D18). It also adjusts D19 to better represent SE Arizona and ranch land. D19 SHOULD NOT go north of Cochise County line.

Plan submitted by: redistrictadmin on 10/18/2021 USER DESCRIPTION: In this version based off LD Test Map Version 4.0, Tombstone and a portion of Cochise County are united into District 19. USER PLAN OBJECTIVE: N/A

Plan submitted by: AZ71@22 on 12/12/2021 USER DESCRIPTION: This map is based of LD 12.0 but balances out population and communities of interest in the Tucson and southern regions. USER PLAN OBJECTIVE: PLEASE REVIEW! Based off the LD 12.0 map, this map is primarily focused on Southern AZ, however all districts are drawn logically and population balanced. It accomplishes the requests of Mehl & Lerner: MEHL: LD17 includes Saddlebrook, Red Rock & the area south of Park Link Dr in Pinal County. It also now includes Picture Rocks and keeps Marana & Oro Valley together. LERNER: LD20 now has its city line drawn down Campbell Ave in the northern part of the city then jumps to Country Club Ave (halfway between Campbell & Alvernon) following Mayor Romero's request. It also incorporates the Pascua Yaqui Tribe in LD20. LD18 includes Tanque Verde and eastern Tucson separating Vail into LD19 along with Corona de Tucson. LD21 now combines Green Valley and Sahuarita in one district which many locals requested. Unfortunately, the Latino Coalition arm into Cochise County is eliminated as there is no way to population balance in Cochise County and still keep Santa Cruz County as one. (Plus I don't think it's wise to place Bisbee, the county seat of Cochise County, into a completely different district associated with another county). This map also incorporates some of the Yuma Gold map. LD23 is population balanced and shares Yuma with LD28 that stretches into the west Phx valley area. The same as LD23 stretches from Yuma into the west valley region of Tucson.

Plan submitted by: RyanA1084 on 10/7/2021 USER DESCRIPTION: Map of statewide congressional districts, developed with a focus on CD2. All populations have been approximately balanced and districts have made competitive where possible. Unlike the Grid Map, CD2 on this map does not go into Cochise County, which has unique issues related to the Mexican border and military bases that distinguish it from the interests of the rest of CD2. This map designs CD2 to include as many tribal communities as possible. This results in a deviation of -3% in population in CD2, +2% in CD6, and +1% in CD9. USER PLAN OBJECTIVE: Map of statewide congressional districts, developed with a focus on CD2. All populations have been approximately balanced and districts have made competitive where possible. Unlike the Grid Map, CD2 on this map does not go into Cochise County, which has unique issues related to the Mexican border and military bases that distinguish it from the interests of the rest of CD2. This map designs CD2 to include as many tribal communities as possible. This results in a deviation of -3% in population in CD2, +2% in CD6, and +1% in CD9.

Plan submitted by: AriBradshaw on 09/20/2021 USER DESCRIPTION: This map unites most native tribes in Arizona to one district. It creates another rural district that consists of Snowflake, Prescott, Sedona, Graham County, Greenlee County, Cochise County, Santa Cruz County, and the rural parts of Pima county. There is a semi-rural district that combines rural-esque suburbs of Phoenix with Prescott. It creates a hispanic-focused district in the Southwest of Phoenix, a Central/Western Phoenix district, a Northeast Phoenix/Scottsdale district, and two EValley. USER PLAN OBJECTIVE: N/A

Plan submitted by: AriBradshaw on 10/20/2021 USER DESCRIPTION: Gave Graham and Greenlee to D2. Gave all of San Tan to D5 and spiralled from there. Gave all of the radically different part of downtown to D1 from D3. USER PLAN OBJECTIVE: Dear Commission, Mappers, Lawyers, and Public:

This map differs from the adopted 5.0 Map in the following ways:

Each district is equal in population.

We have added all of Colorado City and Wickenburg from D9 to D2. We have added the Biltmore/Arcadia-influenced "new Downtown" where First Friday occurs to D1 from D3.

We have added all of San Tan Valley together in D5. This area does not belong in D2 at all. By adding all of San Tan to D5 and by honoring the VRA in D3, D4 is forced to extend further into the East Valley. This means that it has around 50-70k overpopulation if it continues to include land North of the river. For this reason, the natives are united with the Ft. McDowell natives and Scottsdale is united together from D4 to D1.

We have united the Sun Cities together in D9.

The VRA D7 was made more conducive to the VRA by trading parts of Tucson, Yuma (city), and Maricopa (county) with various districts.Pinal's divisions need to make sense if Pinal is to be divided. Florence and Coolidge must go together. Apache Junction and San Tan must go together. Maricopa and Casa Grande should go together - though are more separable than the others. The southernmost part around Red Rock and Saddlebrook ought to be included in D5 no matter what. We understand the commission's hesitation to have an "arm" sticking out from D5, but we feel that these exurban cities have much much much more in common with Tucson than they do with a rural district such as D2 or the Latino VRA-oriented district such as D9. We urge the commission to strongly consider these points considering Pinal County.

We have added Graham and Greenlee Counties to D2. There is no logical reason why these should be included into a southern district. The mining communities of Greenlee County should not have their small voices diluted even further by urban populations. Additionally, the rural lifestyles along the valley in Graham county are much more akin to those in southern Apache and Navajo than in Pima or Santa Cruz.

We understand the hesitation to even consider adding parts of Cochise to D2. However, when faced with the alternatives, no option best respects the populations of towns like Benson or Wilcox as giving them to a rural district like D2. Giving them to D5 effectively nullifies their voice while D2 must take from an urban area instead. We would rather sacrifice appearance of contiguousness for the sake of the voice of the rural communities along the I10 in Cochise County.

We have added Gold Canyon to D5 from D2. However, for population rebalancing in the Phoenix area, we understand if you return it to D2.

Finally, we have added a portion of D8 south of Cave Creek to D1. This community was split down the middle by an arbitrary diagonal so we attempted to balance it.

Thank you so much to the Commission, Mapping Team, Lawyers, and AZ public for your work and dedication to the State of Arizona. God Bless.