Frequencies and percentages of overall and per domain GRADE rating for Cochrane and non-Cochrane meta-analyses.

The impact of different journal submission requirements on report quality.

Multiple linear regression determinants of reporting quality of RCTs.

The evaluation result of the CONSORT checklist.

‡2011 Journal Citation Reports® (Thomson Reuters, 2012). The highest impact factor for oral health journals is 3.961 (Periodontology 2000).†Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), where Cochrane SRs are published, was classified as a general journal.§Includes Cochrane SRs only (CDSR’s impact factor = 5.912).*Includes SRs published in oral health journals without impact factor.¶Includes SRs published in non-oral health journals.‡Does not equal 100% for overall, as Cochrane SRs were not considered in the analysis.N/A, not applicable.

Background

Laparoscopic surgery (LS) is hypothesized to result in milder proinflammatory reactions due to less severe operative trauma, which may contribute to the observed clinical benefits after LS. However, previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the impact of LS on immunocompetence are outdated, limited and heterogeneous. Therefore, the humoral response after laparoscopic and open colorectal cancer (CRC) resections was evaluated in a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods

Included were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) measuring parameters of humoral immunity after LS compared to open surgery (OS) in adult patients with CRC of any stage. MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science (SCI-EXPANDED), Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov and ICTRP (World Health Organization) were systematically searched. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Cochrane RoB2 tool. Weighted inverse variance meta-analysis of mean differences was performed for C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, tumour necrosis factor (TNF)α and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) using the random-effects method. Methods were prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021264324). Results

Twenty RCTs with 1131 participants were included. Narrative synthesis and meta-analysis up to 8 days after surgery was performed. Quantitative synthesis found concentrations to be significantly lower after LS at 0–2 h after surgery (IL-8), at 3–9 h (CRP, IL-6, IL-8, TNFα) and at postoperative day 1 (CRP, IL-6, IL-8, VEGF). At 3–9 h, IL-6 was notably lower in the LS group by 86.71 pg/ml (mean difference [MD] − 86.71 pg/ml [− 125.05, − 48.37], p < 0.00001). Combined narratively, 13 studies reported significantly lower concentrations of considered parameters in LS patients, whereas only one study reported lower inflammatory markers (for CRP and IL-6) after OS. Conclusion

The increase in postoperative concentrations of several proinflammatory parameters was significantly less pronounced after LS than after OS in this meta-analysis. Overall, the summarized evidence reinforces the view of a lower induction of inflammation due to LS

Characteristics of the interventions and outcomes.

Details of the criteria of credibility assessment used in umbrella reviews published in the top-100 ranking journalsb'*'.

Description of included umbrella reviews.

• Source: ISI Web of Knowledge 2013, Journal Citations Reports via www.webofknowledge.com, accessed on September 3rd, 2014.Impact Factors (2013) top 5 Ear Nose Throat (ENT) journals and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

Certainty and methodological quality assessment in included URs.

ObjectiveThis systematic review aimed to examine the impact of technology- and parent-based psychosocial interventions on family factors among children with cancer, focusing on family dynamics.MethodsData were sourced from ten databases (CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, Sinomed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and CINAHL) up to August 2024. The PRISMA statement guidelines, the Cochrane risk bias assessment tool, and the non-randomized controlled trial risk bias assessment tool were used in this study and experimental and quasi-experimental studies were included. The review protocol is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023435402).ResultsTwelve studies, including seven randomized controlled trials and five quasi-experimental studies, involving 1,309 parents of children with cancer, were included in the review. These studies utilized various theoretical models and delivered interventions through different modes, such as Internet-based platforms and telehealth. Overall, technology- and parent-based interventions have demonstrated positive effects on family dynamics factors, including family function, communication, coping ability, and family burden.ConclusionsTechnology- and parent-based psychosocial interventions showed promise in enhancing family dynamics factors although intervention methods varied across studies. This review recommends larger-scale randomized controlled trials to evaluate the effectiveness of technology- and parent-based psychosocial interventions on family dynamics factors among this vulnerable population and highlights the potential of such interventions to improve care quality, treatment outcomes, and resource allocation in pediatric oncology.

BackgroundImmunotherapy has become one of the most important breakthroughs in cancer treatment. Consequently, there have been more immuno-oncology (IO) clinical trials for various cancers in recent decades. However, the quality of such trials in reporting adverse events (AE), especially immune-related AE (irAE), has not been comprehensively evaluated.MethodsWe evaluated the harm reporting quality of IO trials. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched to identify all head-to-head phase II and III clinical trials assessing cancer immunotherapy published between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2021. Publications were assessed using a 16-point harm reporting quality score (HRQS) derived from the 2004 Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) extension. The characteristics associated with improved reporting quality were identified with linear regression.ResultsA total of 123 publications were included. The mean HRQS was 11.1 (range, 5-14). The most common poorly reported items were harms addressed in the title (2%), AE collection methodology (3%), the statistical approach for analyzing harms (11%), and the irAE onset patterns and management (adequately reported in 14% and 33% of publications, respectively). The harm information was well described in the publications’ Results and Discussion sections (89-99%). The multivariable regression model revealed that higher impact factor (IF) (30ConclusionOur findings show that AE reporting in IO randomized trials is suboptimal. Efforts should be made to improve harm reporting and to standardize reporting practices. Improvements in AE reporting would permit more balanced assessment of interventions and would enhance evidence-based IO practice.

Subgroup analysis of the effects of exercise on body composition.

BackgroundAlcohol use is a contributing factor in many cases of traumatic injury. There is conflicting evidence on the impact of alcohol use at the time of physical trauma on severity of injury and hospital course. Similarly, the significance of alcohol use disorder on outcomes in hospitalized trauma patients is unclear. This scoping review aims to provide a concise overview of the current literature surrounding peri-trauma alcohol use and alcohol use disorder on injury severity, in-hospital complications, patient outcomes, and long-term health impact of alcohol use in trauma. We will also explore the associated healthcare costs of this patient population.MethodsA systematic search of the following databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library will be completed to extract all studies that meet our inclusion criteria from January 2000 onwards. Case reports will be excluded. Two reviewers will screen all citations, abstracts, and full text articles. A third reviewer will act as tiebreaker at each stage of the screening process. A narrative synthesis without meta-analysis will be conducted and assessed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines.DiscussionThis review will contribute to the literature by providing a concise overview of the current data on the impact of alcohol on outcomes following trauma. We will explore the overall themes in the literature, limitations, and future directions to focus forthcoming research in this patient population.Scoping review registrationThis project is registered via the Open Science Framework. The public registration is uniquely identified with the following DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/Z84WK.SupportThere were no funders or sponsors involved in the development of this protocol.

BackgroundHumanitarian crises and disasters affect millions of people worldwide. Humanitarian aid workers are civilians or professionals who respond to disasters and provide humanitarian assistance. In doing so, they face several stressors and traumatic exposures. Humanitarian aid workers also face unique challenges associated with working in unfamiliar settings.ObjectiveTo determine the occurrence of and factors associated with mental ill-health among humanitarian aid workers.Search strategyCINAHL plus, Cochrane library, Global Health, Medline, PubMed, Web of Science were searched from 2005–2020. Grey literature was searched on Google Scholar.Selection criteriaPRISMA guidelines were followed and after double screening, studies reporting occurrence of mental ill-health were included. Individual narratives and case studies were excluded, as were studies that reported outcomes in non-humanitarian aid workers.Data analysisData on occurrence of mental ill-health and associated factors were independently extracted and combined in a narrative summary. A random effects logistic regression model was used for the meta-analysis.Main resultsNine studies were included with a total of 3619 participants, reporting on five types of mental ill-health (% occurrence) including psychological distress (6.5%-52.8%); burnout (8.5%-32%); anxiety (3.8%-38.5%); depression (10.4%-39.0%) and post-traumatic stress disorder (0% to 25%). Hazardous drinking of alcohol ranged from 16.2%-50.0%. Meta-analysis reporting OR (95% CI) among humanitarian aid workers, for psychological distress was 0.45 (0.12–1.64); burnout 0.34 (0.27–0.44); anxiety 0.22 (0.10–0.51); depression 0.32 (0.18–0.57) and PTSD 0.11 (0.03–0.39). Associated factors included young age, being female and pre-existing mental ill-health.ConclusionsMental ill-health is common among humanitarian aid workers, has a negative impact on personal well-being, and on a larger scale reduces the efficacy of humanitarian organisations with delivery of aid and retention of staff. It is imperative that mental ill-health is screened for, detected and treated in humanitarian aid workers, before, during and after their placements. It is essential to implement psychologically protective measures for individuals working in stressful and traumatic crises.

Objective: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by developmentally inappropriate inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity. Multiple cognitive training appeared to be more effective than working memory training, but the evidence remains insufficient, particularly for the subgroup symptoms and executive function behaviors at home. Further analysis of the impact of factors on the effectiveness would facilitate the development of cognitive training.Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Psyche, Embase, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, CNKI, and Weifang Database, and included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of children with ADHD undergoing cognitive intervention. Metaanalysis and univariate metaregression were performed by STATE. The risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias tool 2.0 by the two investigators separately. This study was registered with INPLASY, number INPLASY202140065.Results: We included 17 RCTs in the systematic review, with a combined 1,075 participants. For metaanalyses of both subgroups of ADHD symptoms and the executive function behaviors, the test of published bias failed to reach the p < 0.05 level. When all of the training are considered together, cognitive training can improve the presentation of inattention symptoms [SMD = −0.390, 95%CI (−0.675, −0.104)] and executive function behaviors (SMD = −0.319, 95%CI (−0.527, −0.111)]. In the subgroup analysis, the effects of working memory training on both presentations were not statistically significant. In contrast, the multiple cognitive training had significant effects on the presentation of inattention symptoms [SMD = −0.507, 95% CI (−0.722, −0.292)], hyperactivity/impulsivity [SMD = −0.305, 95% CI (−0.518, −0.09)], and the executive function behaviors [SMD = −0.499, 95%CI (−0.707, −0.290)]. In addition, metaregression analysis showed that only training frequency did significantly impact the symptoms of ADHD and the executive function behaviors.Conclusion: This study showed that improvements in symptoms and executive function behaviors were related to the domains of cognitive intervention. The findings suggest that multiple domains of cognitive training and moderate training frequency may have wider clinical benefits. All the above results highlight further research in refining the executive functions of children with ADHD and developing individually tailored cognitive intervention on homes based for children with vulnerable executive functions.Systematic Review Registration: [http://inplasy.com/], [INPLASY202140065].

It is estimated that disruptions to life caused by the COVID-19 pandemic have led to an increase in the number of children and young people suffering from mental health issues globally. In England one in four children experienced poor mental health in 2022. Social prescribing is gaining traction as a systems-based approach, which builds upon person-centered methods, to refer children and young people with non-clinical mental health issues to appropriate community assets. Recognition of social prescribing benefits for children’s mental health is increasing, yet evidence is limited. Inconsistent terminology and variation of terms used to describe social prescribing practices across the literature hinders understanding and assessment of social prescribing’s impact on children’s mental health. This scoping review thus aims to systematically identify and analyse the various terms, concepts and language used to describe social prescribing with children and young people across the wider health and social care literature base. The scoping review will be undertaken using a six-stage framework which includes: identifying the research question, identifying relevant studies, study selection, charting the data, collating, summarising and reporting the results, and consultation. Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, PsychInfo, Social Policy Practice, Scopus, Science Direct, Cochrane library and Joanna Briggs), alongside evidence from grey literature, hand search, citation tracking, and use of expert correspondence will be included in the review to ensure published and unpublished literature is captured. Data extraction will be carried out by two reviewers using a predefined form to capture study characteristics, intervention descriptions, outcomes, and key terms used to report social prescribing for children and young people. No formal quality appraisal or risk of bias evaluation will be performed, as this scoping review aims to map and describe the literature. Data will be stored and managed using the Rayaan.ai platform and a critical narrative of the common themes found will be included.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of dupilumab treatment on the quality of life, psychological factors and clinical symptoms, in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.MethodsA comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Data coverage extends until April 2024. The study exclusively encompassed randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was the quality of life of patients, with subgroup analyses conducted. Revman 5.4 and Stata 15.1 software were used for the analyses.ResultsThis study included 17 studies with a total of 6,665 participants. To evaluate quality of life, six instruments were used: the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), the Quality of Life Index for Atopic Dermatitis (QoLIAD), the Children’s Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI), the Infant’s Dermatitis Quality of Life Index (IDQoL), the Dermatitis Family Impact (DFI), and the EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D). The QoLIAD is specifically designed for atopic dermatitis. The results demonstrated that dupilumab significantly improved DLQI/QoLIAD scores in adult patients (SMD = −0.64, 95% CI [-0.84, −0.45], p < 0.00001), the CDLQI/IDQoL scores in children/adolescents (SMD = −0.73, 95% CI [-0.84, −0.63], p < 0.00001), family quality of life measured by DFI (SMD = −0.97, 95% CI [-1.20, −0.75], p < 0.00001), and EQ-5D scores (SMD = 0.64, 95% CI [0.46, 0.82], p < 0.00001). The study also reported significant improvements in sleep-related metrics, total score on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), HADS anxiety scale, and HADS depression score. Additional improvements were observed in the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD), percent Body Surface Area (BSA), Global Individual Sign Score (GISS), and Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) response.ConclusionOur study demonstrates that dupilumab significantly enhances patients’ quality of life and alleviates symptoms. This meta-analysis utilizes various assessment tools to evaluate quality of life, synthesizing data from recent clinical trials. It builds on prior research to provide a comprehensive analysis of dupilumab’s effects and overall efficacy. The aim of this study is to offer evidence-based insights to improve the clinical application of dupilumab.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/.

Characteristics of the included studies and participants.