Frequencies and percentages of overall and per domain GRADE rating for Cochrane and non-Cochrane meta-analyses.

Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy Impact Factor 2024-2025 - ResearchHelpDesk - Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy (Sys Rev Pharm.), (SRP) (Print ISSN: 0975-8453, E-ISSN: 0976-2779) a half-yearly publication, serves the need of different scientists and others involved in Pharmaceutical research and development. Each issue covers review articles on Drug discovery topics, and also publishes full-length reviews related to different subjects in pharmacy and that are of broad readership interest to users in industry, academia, and government. The first issue was published online in December 2009. All contributions to Sys. Rev Pharm are reviewed by the peer review process and copyediting process with the understanding that they have not been published previously and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. Author/s is/are responsible for all statements made in their work and obtaining necessary permission to republish any previously published illustrations and/or other relevant materials. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive the final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository. Scope of the journal The journal covers and publishes all articles related to Pharmacy subjects including some of the allied subjects. Articles with timely interest and newer research concepts will be given more preference. This journal also publishes manuscripts related to agriculture and agriculture sciences. Topics include all aspects of crop and animal physiology, modeling of crop and animal systems, the scientific underpinning of agronomy and husbandry, animal welfare and behavior, soil science, plant and animal product quality, plant and animal nutrition, engineering solutions, decision support systems, land use, environmental impacts of agriculture and forestry, impacts of climate change, rural biodiversity, experimental design, and statistical analysis, and the application of new analytical and study methods (including genetic diversity and molecular biology approaches). Abstracted and Indexed in Academic Search Complete Baidu Scholar CNKI Scholar (China National Knowledge Infrastructure) Chemical Abstracts CABI Full Text Dimensions EBSCO (relevant databases) EBSCO Discovery Service Genamics JournalSeek Google Scholar Index Copernicus J-Gate JournalTOCs JournalGuide Microsoft Academic ProQuest (relevant databases) Publons PhcogBase ReadCube SCOPUS Scimago Journal Ranking SCILIT Sherpa/RoMEO Summon (Serials Solutions/ProQuest) Ulrich's Periodicals Directory/ulrichsweb WorldCat (OCLC) ROAD

ObjectivesThe main objective was to assess the credibility of the evidence using Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) in oral health systematic reviews on the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) and elsewhere.Study Design and SettingSystematic Reviews or meta-analyses (January 2008-December 2013) from 14 high impact general dental and specialty dental journals and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were screened for meta-analyses. Data was collected at the systematic review, meta-analysis and trial level. Two reviewers applied and agreed on the GRADE rating for the selected meta-analyses.ResultsFrom the 510 systematic reviews initially identified 91 reviews (41 Cochrane and 50 non-Cochrane) were eligible for inclusion. The quality of evidence was high in 2% and moderate in 18% of the included meta-analyses with no difference between Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews, journal impact factor or year of publication. The most common domains prompting downgrading of the evidence were study limitations (risk of bias) and imprecision (risk of play of chance).ConclusionThe quality of the evidence in oral health assessed using GRADE is predominantly low or very low suggesting a pressing need for more randomised clinical trials and other studies of higher quality in order to inform clinical decisions thereby reducing the risk of instituting potentially ineffective and/or harmful therapies.

Validation of the 4 risk-of-bias domains between automated and human assessments in RCTs obtained from the Cochrane systematic reviews risk-of-bias tables.

†2011 Journal Citation Reports® (Thomson Reuters, 2012).‡SRs published in Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine were included in Journal of Dental Research. Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine was merged into the Journal of Dental Research (last issue Nov 2004).IF, impact factor; N/A, not applicable.

Objectives: A rapidly developing scenario like a pandemic requires the prompt production of high-quality systematic reviews, which can be automated using artificial intelligence (AI) techniques. We evaluated the application of AI tools in COVID-19 evidence syntheses. Study design: After prospective registration of the review protocol, we automated the download of all open-access COVID-19 systematic reviews in the COVID-19 Living Overview of Evidence database, indexed them for AI-related keywords, and located those that used AI tools. We compared their journals’ JCR Impact Factor, citations per month, screening workloads, completion times (from pre-registration to preprint or submission to a journal) and AMSTAR-2 methodology assessments (maximum score 13 points) with a set of publication date matched control reviews without AI. Results: Of the 3999 COVID-19 reviews, 28 (0.7%, 95% CI 0.47-1.03%) made use of AI. On average, compared to controls (n=64), AI reviews were published in journals...

Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy Acceptance Rate - ResearchHelpDesk - Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy (Sys Rev Pharm.), (SRP) (Print ISSN: 0975-8453, E-ISSN: 0976-2779) a half-yearly publication, serves the need of different scientists and others involved in Pharmaceutical research and development. Each issue covers review articles on Drug discovery topics, and also publishes full-length reviews related to different subjects in pharmacy and that are of broad readership interest to users in industry, academia, and government. The first issue was published online in December 2009. All contributions to Sys. Rev Pharm are reviewed by the peer review process and copyediting process with the understanding that they have not been published previously and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. Author/s is/are responsible for all statements made in their work and obtaining necessary permission to republish any previously published illustrations and/or other relevant materials. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive the final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository. Scope of the journal The journal covers and publishes all articles related to Pharmacy subjects including some of the allied subjects. Articles with timely interest and newer research concepts will be given more preference. This journal also publishes manuscripts related to agriculture and agriculture sciences. Topics include all aspects of crop and animal physiology, modeling of crop and animal systems, the scientific underpinning of agronomy and husbandry, animal welfare and behavior, soil science, plant and animal product quality, plant and animal nutrition, engineering solutions, decision support systems, land use, environmental impacts of agriculture and forestry, impacts of climate change, rural biodiversity, experimental design, and statistical analysis, and the application of new analytical and study methods (including genetic diversity and molecular biology approaches). Abstracted and Indexed in Academic Search Complete Baidu Scholar CNKI Scholar (China National Knowledge Infrastructure) Chemical Abstracts CABI Full Text Dimensions EBSCO (relevant databases) EBSCO Discovery Service Genamics JournalSeek Google Scholar Index Copernicus J-Gate JournalTOCs JournalGuide Microsoft Academic ProQuest (relevant databases) Publons PhcogBase ReadCube SCOPUS Scimago Journal Ranking SCILIT Sherpa/RoMEO Summon (Serials Solutions/ProQuest) Ulrich's Periodicals Directory/ulrichsweb WorldCat (OCLC) ROAD

General psychiatry Impact Factor 2024-2025 - ResearchHelpDesk - General Psychiatry (GPSYCH) is an open access journal that covers all topics of interest to psychiatrists and other mental health professionals internationally. The journal includes original research, systematic reviews, meta-analyses (that, unlike meta-analyses in other journals, pool results from studies published in Chinese and English), forums on topical issues (with commentaries from Chinese and international authors), case reports, research methods in psychiatry, and a unique section on ‘Biostatistics in Psychiatry’. Original articles on basic research, clinical research, community-based studies, and ecological studies are all considered for publication.

Indian Journal of Child Health Impact Factor 2024-2025 - ResearchHelpDesk - Indian Journal of Child Health (IJCH) is a monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal published by Atharva Scientific Publications, Bhopal, India. IJCH is both online and print, open access journal and it allows free access to its contents and permits authors to self-archive the final accepted version of their articles. The journal publishes articles covering various aspects of child health including basic research and clinical investigations in different fields of pediatrics covering perinatal and neonatal to adolescent age group. Aim and Scope: The Indian Journal of Child Health aims to publish scientifically written, high-quality articles addressing significant questions in basic research and clinical practice related to child health. Journal publishes articles covering all the aspects of pediatrics, including various subspecialties and also epidemiology and social issues related to neonates, children, and adolescents. The journal invites articles in various categories including perspectives, research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analysis, review articles, short communications, case reports, research letters, letters to the editor, images, and book reviews etc. Manuscripts should present novel findings addressing significant questions in pediatrics and neonatology, should not be published or not being considered for publication elsewhere. After initial review by our editorial board, all articles will be sent out for review by external reviewers. The acceptance criteria are the quality and originality of the research and its significance to our readership. Key features: Peer-reviewed content Free online access Monthly publication Distinguished Editorial team Covered in major indexing and abstracting services Immediate online-publication after acceptance

The impact of different journal submission requirements on report quality.

This is a network of 14 systematic reviews on the salt controversy and their included studies. Each edge in the network represents an inclusion from one systematic review to an article. Systematic reviews were collected from Trinquart (Trinquart, L., Johns, D. M., & Galea, S. (2016). Why do we think we know what we know? A metaknowledge analysis of the salt controversy. International Journal of Epidemiology, 45(1), 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyv184 ). FILE FORMATS 1) Article_list.csv - Unicode CSV 2) Article_attr.csv - Unicode CSV 3) inclusion_net_edges.csv - Unicode CSV 4) potential_inclusion_link.csv - Unicode CSV 5) systematic_review_inclusion_criteria.csv - Unicode CSV 6) Supplementary Reference List.pdf - PDF ROW EXPLANATIONS 1) Article_list.csv - Each row describes a systematic review or included article. 2) Article_attr.csv - Each row is the attributes of a systematic review/included article. 3) inclusion_net_edges.csv - Each row represents an inclusion from a systematic review to an article. 4) potential_inclusion_link.csv - Each row shows the available evidence base of a systematic review. 5) systematic_review_inclusion_criteria.csv - Each row is the inclusion criteria of a systematic review. 6) Supplementary Reference List.pdf - Each item is a bibliographic record of a systematic review/included paper. COLUMN HEADER EXPLANATIONS 1) Article_list.csv: ID - Numeric ID of a paper paper assigned ID - ID of the paper from Trinquart et al. (2016) Type - Systematic review / primary study report Study Groupings - Groupings for related primary study reports from the same report, from Trinquart et al. (2016) (if applicable, otherwise blank) Title - Title of the paper year - Publication year of the paper Attitude - Scientific opinion about the salt controversy from Trinquart et al. (2016) Doi - DOIs of the paper. (if applicable, otherwise blank) Retracted (Y/N) - Whether the paper was retracted or withdrawn (Y). Blank if not retracted or withdrawn. 2) Article_attr.csv: ID - Numeric ID of a paper year - Publication year Attitude - Scientific opinion about the salt controversy from Trinquart et al. (2016) Type - Systematic review/ primary study report 3) inclusion_net_edges.csv: citing_ID - The numeric ID of a systematic review cited_ID - The numeric ID of the included articles 4) potential_inclusion_link.csv: This data was translated from the Sankey diagram given in Trinquart et al. (2016) as Web Figure 4. Each row indicates a systematic review and each column indicates a primary study. In the matrix, "p" indicates that a given primary study had been published as of the search date of a given systematic review. 5)systematic_review_inclusion_criteria.csv: ID - The numeric IDs of systematic reviews paper assigned ID - ID of the paper from Trinquart et al. (2016) attitude - Its scientific opinion about the salt controversy from Trinquart et al. (2016) No. of studies included - Number of articles included in the systematic review Study design - Study designs to include, per inclusion criteria population - Populations to include, per inclusion criteria Exposure/Intervention - Exposures/Interventions to include, per inclusion criteria outcome - Study outcomes required for inclusion, per inclusion criteria Language restriction - Report languages to include, per inclusion criteria follow-up period - Follow-up period required for inclusion, per inclusion criteria

Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy FAQ - ResearchHelpDesk - Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy (Sys Rev Pharm.), (SRP) (Print ISSN: 0975-8453, E-ISSN: 0976-2779) a half-yearly publication, serves the need of different scientists and others involved in Pharmaceutical research and development. Each issue covers review articles on Drug discovery topics, and also publishes full-length reviews related to different subjects in pharmacy and that are of broad readership interest to users in industry, academia, and government. The first issue was published online in December 2009. All contributions to Sys. Rev Pharm are reviewed by the peer review process and copyediting process with the understanding that they have not been published previously and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. Author/s is/are responsible for all statements made in their work and obtaining necessary permission to republish any previously published illustrations and/or other relevant materials. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive the final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository. Scope of the journal The journal covers and publishes all articles related to Pharmacy subjects including some of the allied subjects. Articles with timely interest and newer research concepts will be given more preference. This journal also publishes manuscripts related to agriculture and agriculture sciences. Topics include all aspects of crop and animal physiology, modeling of crop and animal systems, the scientific underpinning of agronomy and husbandry, animal welfare and behavior, soil science, plant and animal product quality, plant and animal nutrition, engineering solutions, decision support systems, land use, environmental impacts of agriculture and forestry, impacts of climate change, rural biodiversity, experimental design, and statistical analysis, and the application of new analytical and study methods (including genetic diversity and molecular biology approaches). Abstracted and Indexed in Academic Search Complete Baidu Scholar CNKI Scholar (China National Knowledge Infrastructure) Chemical Abstracts CABI Full Text Dimensions EBSCO (relevant databases) EBSCO Discovery Service Genamics JournalSeek Google Scholar Index Copernicus J-Gate JournalTOCs JournalGuide Microsoft Academic ProQuest (relevant databases) Publons PhcogBase ReadCube SCOPUS Scimago Journal Ranking SCILIT Sherpa/RoMEO Summon (Serials Solutions/ProQuest) Ulrich's Periodicals Directory/ulrichsweb WorldCat (OCLC) ROAD

*multiple answers possible.

Findings from current and previous studies on assessment of publication and outcome reporting biases in systematic reviews of health literature.

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was used meta-analysis to investigate changes of serum tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM).MethodsRelevant literatures were identified from PubMed, Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang and Chinese-Cqvip databases (published from January 1, 1999 to September 30, 2016). Eligible reports were included for pooled analysis of serum TNF-α level and subgroup analysis was performed in relation with age, disease duration and ethnicity.ResultsA total of 23 articles (1631 T1DM cases, 1429 healthy controls) were included for this meta-analysis. Compared with the controls, the patients had significantly increased serum TNF-α level (P < 0.001). Similar results were also found among all subgroup analysis of different age, disease duration and ethnicity (with the exception of Asian) (all P < 0.05). Regression analysis indicated that age (P = 0.680), disease duration (P = 0.957), and ethnicity (P = 0.526) of patients were not significant impact factors for the high heterogeneity. The results were stable according to the sensitivity analysis and no publication bias existed in this meta-analysis.ConclusionsSerum TNF-α level in T1DM patients has significantly elevated among all age, disease duration and ethnicity groups.

Additional file 2.

APOS Trends in Orthodontics Impact Factor 2024-2025 - ResearchHelpDesk - The APOS Trends in Orthodontics (APOS) is an open access peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing high-quality articles in the field of Orthodontic . The journal is an orthodontic specialty journal and aims to provide its readers state of the art information on orthodontic advances both in the research and clinical arena. Potential authors may submit original research conducted after ethical clearances, clinical case reports, clinical/technique pearls and book reviews. Systematic reviews are welcome, descriptive reviews are not within the scope of the journal. We welcome research that follows the CONSORT, PRISMA, STROBE and STARD guidelines. The experts’ corner in every current issue is an invitational article to a professional with expertise in a given area of orthodontics, as determined by the editorial board. The journal respects the scientific submission of its authors and believes in following an expeditious double-blind peer review process and endeavours to complete the review process within the scheduled time frame. A significant effort from the author and the journal perhaps enables to strike equilibrium to meet the professional expectations of the peers in the world of scientific publication. APOS Trends believes in safeguarding the privacy rights of human subjects. In order to comply with it, the journal instructs all authors when uploading the manuscript to also add the ethical clearance (human/animals)/informed consent of the subject in the manuscript. This applies to the study/case report that involves animal/human subjects/human specimens, e.g., extracted tooth parts/soft tissue for biopsy/in-vitro analysis. Abstracting and Indexing Information The journal is registered with the following abstracting partners: EBSCO Publishing’s Electronic Databases, Google Scholar, Crossref, Open Academic Journals Index (OAJI), Directory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), Eurasian Scientific Journal Index, Scientific Indexing Services (SIS) and Index Copernicus International World of Journals (ICI), International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). The journal is indexed with: DOAJ, Emerging Sources Citation Index, Index Copernicus.

Indian Journal of Dermatology Impact Factor 2024-2025 - ResearchHelpDesk - Indian Journal of Dermatology - journal publishes information related to skin-pathology and different modes of therapeutics, including dermatosurgery and cosmetic dermatology. Likewise, it carries articles on leprosy, STI and HIV/AIDS. The editorial board encourages the authors to publish articles addressing emerging techniques and developments in the subject specialty, in the form of Original investigations, Narrative and Systematic Reviews as well as Case Reports. The journal aims at publishing Editorials and Commentaries from eminent personalities on a regular basis. Published since 1955, Indian Journal of Dermatology (IJD), (ISSN: Print- 0019-5154, Online - 1998-3611) is the oldest published journal of Dermatology in Asia and one of the oldest peer-reviewed journals dedicated to this particular discipline. The journal is being published regularly since its inception and continues to be one of the pioneer medical journals from India. In 1962, it became the first indexed Dermatology Journal from Asia, whereas in 1965, it became the official organ of the then Dermatological Society of India. Since 1973, it is being published by Indian Association of Dermatologists, Venereologists and Leprologists, West Bengal State branch. IJD became the official organ of AADV from May-June 2012 (Vol 57,Issue 3) without any change of name or ownership of the journal. By launching the web version www.e-ijd.org in November 2000, IJD became the first Indian Dermatology journal to enter the internet. Yearly six issues of the journal are being published in the months of February, April, June, August, October and December Indian Journal of Dermatology’s uniqueness lays in being a journal on the global platform where a scientific journal (not only in dermatology but in the entire field of biomedical journals) published by a state branch of a society could not only regularly publish for such a long time but also continue to be an influential, indexed journal.

IP Journal of Diagnostic Pathology and Oncology Impact Factor 2024-2025 - ResearchHelpDesk - IP Journal of Diagnostic Pathology and Oncology (formerly known as Journal of Diagnostic Pathology and Oncology) is an interdisciplinary journal at the interface of pathology and oncology, including the preclinical and translational research, diagnostics and therapy. The journal covers studies related to pathology including morbid anatomy, surgical pathology, clinical pathology, diagnostic cytopathology including gynecologic cytology. Furthermore, JDPO offers an International forum for the rapid communication of reviews, original research, critical and topical reports with excellence and novelty. Published quarterly, JDPO is dedicated to keeping scientists informed of developments in its focused biomedical fields which span the gap between basic research and clinical medicine. Aims and Scope: A special aim of JDPO is to promote publishing activity in pathology and oncology of colleagues in all over the World. The journal will interest pathologists which include Diagnosticians, Biochemists, Microbiologists, Cytopathologist, Histopathologists, Haematopathologists and a broad range of experimental and clinical oncologists, and related experts. This Journal is founded to promote and encourage development and advancement of pathology and oncology and allied specialties in India and also to provide a platform for the fellow surgeons to showcase their work at the global level. It publishes full-length papers, reviews, and other articles of academic interest on all aspects of pathological and Oncological Research. This Journal publishes peer-reviewed original research papers, case reports, systematic reviews, meta-analysis, letters to the editor and brief communications. This journal presents research, reviews and topical reports at the interface of pathology and oncology, coverage spans the gap between basic research and clinical medicine and promotes the publication of pathology and oncology research by specialists in India. All the manuscripts undergo the peer-review process; and articles, with originality in their content, having a valid research methodology, supported by proper reference will be considered for publication. Original Research materials, investigative protocols of both surgical and combined modalities of treatment, including basic research will find preference.

This document presents the T1.1 Systematic Literature Review Dataset, which was collected for the VERITY project, on the topic of ‘trust in science’, based on a total of 83 articles which provide empirical results from various scientific disciplines (e.g., social and educational psychology, medicine, science education, science communication).The methodology for the completion of the Systematic Literature Review was based on the PRISMA protocol, which provides an evidence-based minimum set of criteria for reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.To identify the most appropriate studies for our research questions, the eligibility of the articles to be included in the systematic literature review was determined by the following two main criteria: Only studies directly examining the correlation and causal relationship of various factors to the levels of public trust in science were considered. The factors correlated and affecting the public’s trust in science had to be investigated empirically, without any restrictions on the methodology. Moreover, to ensure the credibility, integrity, and feasibility of the literature review, three criteria were added: The surveys are based on participants aged at least 16 years old (research based on young children was excluded). The study is written in English. The study appears in a peer-reviewed journal as an article. The review began with a comprehensive search for articles in three electronic databases: Scopus, Web of Science and PsycInfo. The selection of Scopus and Web of Science was based on their widely recognized impact indices containing high-calibre scholarly literature published worldwide and across a wide range of scientific fields. PsycInfo was selected as the premier abstracting and indexing database covering the behavioural, social, and psychological sciences. The selected search strategy was based on the two core concepts of our main research question, namely, ‘trust’ and ‘science’. After careful consideration, the following query string was established utilizing Boolean operators (AND, OR): (trust* OR distrust* OR mistrust* ) AND ( scien* ) in TITLE