Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.marketreportanalytics.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.marketreportanalytics.com/privacy-policy
The global code editor market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing demand for software development across various industries and the rising adoption of cloud-based solutions. The market's expansion is fueled by several key factors, including the proliferation of mobile and web applications, the growth of big data analytics, and the increasing need for efficient and collaborative software development processes. The shift towards Agile and DevOps methodologies further accelerates the demand for sophisticated code editors offering features like integrated debugging, version control integration, and collaborative coding capabilities. While the on-premise deployment model still holds a significant share, the web-based segment is witnessing exponential growth due to its accessibility, scalability, and cost-effectiveness. The competitive landscape is characterized by a mix of established players like Microsoft and Sublime HQ, alongside open-source communities contributing significantly to the market's dynamism. The market is segmented by application (personal and enterprise use) and deployment type (on-premise and web-based). Enterprise adoption is a major driver, with large organizations investing heavily in code editor solutions to enhance developer productivity and streamline their software development lifecycles. Future growth will be significantly impacted by advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) integrated into code editors offering features like intelligent code completion, bug detection, and automated refactoring. The market is geographically diverse, with North America and Europe currently holding the largest market share due to the high concentration of tech companies and skilled developers. However, regions like Asia Pacific are experiencing rapid growth, fueled by increasing digitalization and a burgeoning IT sector. Challenges facing the market include the need for continuous updates to keep pace with evolving programming languages and frameworks, ensuring security and data protection within collaborative coding environments, and addressing the skills gap in software development. Despite these challenges, the long-term outlook for the code editor market remains positive, driven by consistent technological advancements and the ever-increasing reliance on software solutions across all sectors of the global economy. We project sustained growth throughout the forecast period (2025-2033), fueled by continuous innovation and expanding adoption across diverse industries and geographies.
Facebook
TwitterThis data package includes information regarding Ambulatory Payment Classification and Code pairs for 'Integrated' Outpatient Code Editor (I/OCE) of outpatient institutional providers. It also contains datasets about Diagnosis Codes, National Correct Codes, Valid Modifiers and Valid Revenue of Initiative Pairs for IOCE Quarterly Release Files.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
This is data set from JetBrains's Python Developer Survey 2017, I have cleaned column names of Raw CSV file
Data set comprises of: What secondary language developers use alongside python? What purpose they use python for? What text editor/IDE they use for python development? Age range of developers
Accompanied is a "PDF" file listing the questions asked in the survey
NOTE:
https://www.jetbrains.com/research/python-developers-survey-2017/
What percentage of Python developers also use Javascript?
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policy
The global text editor software market is a dynamic landscape driven by the increasing demand for efficient code editing tools across diverse sectors, including software development, web design, and data science. The market's growth is fueled by several factors, such as the rising adoption of cloud-based text editors offering collaborative features and seamless accessibility, the proliferation of programming languages requiring specialized editors, and the increasing need for advanced features like intelligent code completion, debugging tools, and version control integration. While the precise market size is unavailable, based on industry reports and the observed growth in related software markets, we can estimate the 2025 market size at approximately $2 billion USD. Considering a conservative Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 8% – a figure reflective of the steady but consistent expansion in this sector – we project substantial growth throughout the forecast period (2025-2033). This growth reflects not only the continuous expansion of the software development sector but also the increasing accessibility of coding and text editing through user-friendly interfaces and online platforms. However, the market also faces challenges. The presence of numerous free and open-source text editors limits the potential for premium software sales. Furthermore, the market is characterized by intense competition, with both established players like Microsoft and Adobe and numerous smaller, niche players vying for market share. This competitive landscape necessitates continuous innovation and adaptation to maintain a strong market position. Segmentation within the market is considerable, with distinctions drawn between IDEs (Integrated Development Environments) with extensive features, lightweight editors for quick tasks, and specialized editors catering to specific programming languages or use cases. The geographic distribution is likely skewed towards regions with strong technological infrastructure and software development hubs like North America and Western Europe, though the market is experiencing growth in other regions as digital literacy expands. Further market penetration hinges on addressing user needs for improved collaboration features, enhanced security, and seamless integration with other development tools.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.statsndata.org/how-to-orderhttps://www.statsndata.org/how-to-order
The AI Code Editor market has emerged as a powerful segment within the broader software development industry, transforming the way developers write, debug, and optimize code. With an increasing demand for efficiency and precision in programming, AI-powered code editors leverage machine learning and natural language
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.wiseguyreports.com/pages/privacy-policyhttps://www.wiseguyreports.com/pages/privacy-policy
| BASE YEAR | 2024 |
| HISTORICAL DATA | 2019 - 2023 |
| REGIONS COVERED | North America, Europe, APAC, South America, MEA |
| REPORT COVERAGE | Revenue Forecast, Competitive Landscape, Growth Factors, and Trends |
| MARKET SIZE 2024 | 2397.5(USD Million) |
| MARKET SIZE 2025 | 2538.9(USD Million) |
| MARKET SIZE 2035 | 4500.0(USD Million) |
| SEGMENTS COVERED | Application, Platform, Deployment Type, End Use, Regional |
| COUNTRIES COVERED | US, Canada, Germany, UK, France, Russia, Italy, Spain, Rest of Europe, China, India, Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, Rest of APAC, Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, Rest of South America, GCC, South Africa, Rest of MEA |
| KEY MARKET DYNAMICS | Cloud integration, Collaboration features, User experience focus, Open-source solutions, AI-driven enhancements |
| MARKET FORECAST UNITS | USD Million |
| KEY COMPANIES PROFILED | Makov, Adobe, Emacs, JetBrains, Visual Studio Code, Microsoft, Atom, Google, Notepad++, Sublime Text, NetBeans, Apple, Eclipse, Coda, TextMate, Vim |
| MARKET FORECAST PERIOD | 2025 - 2035 |
| KEY MARKET OPPORTUNITIES | AI integration for enhanced features, Cloud-based collaboration tools, Multi-platform compatibility expansion, Customization and personalization options, Increased demand for Markdown support |
| COMPOUND ANNUAL GROWTH RATE (CAGR) | 5.9% (2025 - 2035) |
Facebook
Twitter
According to our latest research, the global CSV Editor market size reached USD 1.24 billion in 2024, reflecting robust adoption across various industries. The market is projected to expand at a CAGR of 7.8% from 2025 to 2033, reaching an estimated value of USD 2.43 billion by 2033. This impressive growth trajectory is primarily driven by the rising demand for efficient data management tools, the proliferation of digital transformation initiatives, and the increasing reliance on structured data formats for analytics and business intelligence applications.
One of the most significant growth factors for the CSV Editor market is the exponential increase in data generation across enterprises of all sizes. Organizations are increasingly leveraging CSV editors to manage, clean, and manipulate large datasets for analytics, reporting, and integration purposes. The surge in cloud computing adoption has further amplified the need for agile, scalable, and collaborative data editing solutions, making CSV editors an indispensable tool in the modern data stack. Furthermore, the integration of advanced features such as real-time collaboration, data validation, and seamless interoperability with other business applications has significantly enhanced the value proposition of contemporary CSV editors, driving their adoption across both technical and non-technical user segments.
Another critical driver for the CSV Editor market is the growing emphasis on data-driven decision-making within enterprises. As organizations strive to extract actionable insights from vast volumes of structured and semi-structured data, the ability to efficiently manipulate and curate CSV files becomes paramount. CSV editors are increasingly being integrated with business intelligence platforms, data warehouses, and ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) pipelines, enabling users to streamline data preparation workflows and reduce time-to-insight. The emergence of low-code and no-code platforms has also democratized access to data editing tools, empowering business users to participate in data management processes without requiring extensive technical expertise.
The rapid evolution of regulatory requirements concerning data privacy and governance is also fueling the demand for advanced CSV editors. Organizations must ensure that their data handling practices comply with regulations such as GDPR, HIPAA, and CCPA, which necessitates robust data auditing, validation, and version control capabilities. Modern CSV editors are being equipped with features that facilitate compliance, such as audit trails, role-based access controls, and automated data masking. As a result, industries with stringent compliance mandates, including BFSI, healthcare, and government, are increasingly adopting sophisticated CSV editing solutions to mitigate risks and ensure data integrity.
From a regional perspective, North America continues to dominate the CSV Editor market owing to its mature IT infrastructure, high digital adoption rates, and a strong presence of leading software vendors. However, the Asia Pacific region is witnessing the fastest growth, driven by rapid digitalization, expanding SME sector, and increasing investments in cloud-based solutions. Europe also presents significant opportunities due to the regionÂ’s focus on data protection and the proliferation of data-centric business models. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa regions are gradually catching up, supported by improving internet penetration and government-led digital initiatives.
In the realm of data management tools, the role of a YAML Editor is becoming increasingly significant. As organizations continue to embrace DevOps practices and infrastructure as code, YAML files are frequently used to define configurations, automate processes, and manage application deployments. The simplicity and readability of YAML make it an ideal choice for configuration management, enabling developers and IT professionals to streamline their workflows and reduce the risk of errors. With the growing complexity of IT environments, a robust YAML Editor is essential for ensuring accuracy and consistency across configuration files, thereby enhancing operational efficiency and reducing downtime.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The dataset contains recordings of developers interacting with the QualityAssistant static analysis plugin in Pharo IDE (version 5 and 6). We recorded 7786 development sessions from 547 developers in a time span of 322 days.
In a regular programming session, the developer launches the Pharo IDE and uses the code editor to display code. The Pharo IDE allows the developer to work on a single method or class definition at a time. QualityAssistant then evaluates the browsed code; if the tool finds quality violations, it displays them in the code editor. The developer eventually edits the code, i.e., performing code transformations either manually or using automated tools. After the developer compiles the code, QualityAssistant re-evaluates it and thus more or fewer violations may be displayed to the developer.
By instrumenting this tool, we were able to collect the data about violation reports seen by Pharo developers. More than 933 thousand events corresponding to violations shown in the IDE were collected.
Facebook
Twitter
According to our latest research, the global Hex Editor market size reached USD 1.12 billion in 2024, with a robust compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 7.9% projected for the period 2025 to 2033. By the end of 2033, the market is expected to achieve a value of USD 2.23 billion. The primary growth drivers for the Hex Editor market include the escalating demand for advanced debugging tools, increasing cybersecurity threats, and the critical need for precise binary data manipulation across industries such as software development, cybersecurity, and data recovery.
A key growth factor for the Hex Editor market is the proliferation of complex software environments and the corresponding need for highly specialized tools for software debugging and reverse engineering. As modern applications and systems become more intricate, developers and security professionals increasingly rely on hex editors to inspect, modify, and repair binary files. The adoption of Hex Editors is further propelled by the widespread use of embedded systems, IoT devices, and firmware development, where direct access to binary data is essential for troubleshooting and optimization. Moreover, the integration of Hex Editors into popular integrated development environments (IDEs) and the availability of cross-platform solutions have broadened their appeal among both individual users and enterprises.
Another significant driver is the rising threat landscape in cybersecurity, which has necessitated robust forensic analysis and malware detection capabilities. Hex Editors are indispensable tools for cybersecurity professionals who need to dissect malicious code, analyze suspicious files, and recover corrupted data. The increasing frequency of ransomware attacks, data breaches, and advanced persistent threats (APTs) has led organizations to invest heavily in security tools, including Hex Editors, to strengthen their defensive posture. As regulatory compliance requirements around data integrity and privacy become more stringent, the adoption of Hex Editors for forensic and audit purposes is expected to surge, further fueling market growth.
The ongoing digital transformation across industries is also a significant growth catalyst for the Hex Editor market. Enterprises are increasingly digitizing legacy systems, migrating to cloud-based infrastructures, and deploying new software solutions, all of which require robust tools for data migration, validation, and repair. Hex Editors play a pivotal role in these processes by enabling granular control over file structures and data formats. The surge in data recovery initiatives, especially in sectors such as finance, healthcare, and government, has amplified the demand for advanced hex editing solutions. Additionally, the rise of open-source and community-driven Hex Editors has democratized access to these tools, fostering innovation and customization.
Regionally, North America continues to dominate the Hex Editor market, accounting for the largest revenue share in 2024, driven by a mature IT ecosystem, high cybersecurity spending, and a strong presence of technology companies. Europe follows closely, with significant adoption in sectors such as automotive, aerospace, and industrial automation. The Asia Pacific region is witnessing the fastest growth, fueled by rapid digitalization, increasing investments in IT infrastructure, and a burgeoning developer community. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are also emerging as promising markets, supported by government initiatives to enhance digital resilience and local software development capabilities.
In parallel with the advancements in Hex Editors, the role of XML Editor tools has become increasingly significant in the broader software development landscape. XML Editors are essential for developers working with XML files, which are widely used for data representation and configuration across various applications. These editors provide a user-friendly interface for creating, editing, and validating XML documents, ensuring that the data structures are well-formed and adhere to specific schemas. As the demand for interoperability and data exchange between systems grows, XML Editors play a crucial role in facilitating seamless communication and integration. The ability to efficiently manage and manipulate XML data is vital for developers, particularly in industries such a
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/privacy-policy/https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/privacy-policy/
Integrated Development Environment (IDE) Software Market size was valued at USD 2,431.49 Million in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 3,808.56 Million by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 5.83% from 2024 to 2030.
Global Integrated Development Environment (IDE) Software Market Outlook
Small-medium enterprises are the backbone of any economy. Starting with the most critical aspect, the statistics about small- and medium-sized enterprises, today, SMEs account for most businesses worldwide. They are the most important contributors to job creation and global economic development. SMBs represent an enormous opportunity for the high-tech industry to generate new and recurring revenue, and this market is hugely untapped and doing business differently. As more companies embark on digital transformation, they boost their investment in IT products and services. The Integrated Development Environment (IDE) software market is experiencing a notable surge in demand, primarily fueled by the increasing needs of small and medium-sized businesses (SMBs) for robust software development tools. SMBs, recognizing the pivotal role of software applications in their operations, are actively seeking comprehensive IDE solutions that cater to their unique requirements and resource constraints. As these businesses expand their digital footprint, the demand for streamlined and efficient software development processes has intensified, prompting a corresponding rise in the adoption of IDE software.
SMBs often operate with leaner teams and limited resources, making it crucial for them to invest in tools that enhance developer productivity and collaboration. IDEs offer an integrated and user-friendly platform that consolidates essential development functionalities like code editing, debugging, and project management. The accessibility of these tools empowers SMBs to overcome technical challenges without the need for extensive expertise, accelerating their software development cycles and time-to-market. Security concerns are a significant constraint on the growth of the global integrated development environment (IDE) software market. As the demand for advanced IDE solutions rises, the industry faces challenges related to protecting sensitive code repositories, intellectual property, and data privacy. Integrating cloud-based IDEs while offering unprecedented flexibility and collaboration introduces apprehensions regarding the security of code stored and processed on remote servers. Organizations, particularly those handling proprietary or confidential information, may resist adopting IDE solutions due to fears of unauthorized access, data breaches, or the potential compromise of critical source code.
Additionally, the interconnected nature of modern development environments amplifies the attack surface for potential threats. Malicious actors could exploit vulnerabilities in IDE software to gain unauthorized access, inject malicious code, or compromise the integrity of the development process. Security lapses in IDEs could lead to severe consequences, including intellectual property theft, unauthorized modifications to source code, and compromising sensitive information. The adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in commercial products has increased considerably since the launch of ChatGPT in November 2022. In the future, integrated development environments (IDEs) can also be expected to adopt artificial intelligence. AI and machine learning are expected to help developers write programming code, increasing their productivity and changing their roles. Next-generation IDEs will allow programmers to guide software development rather than write the actual codes. A few IDEs, such as Replit and Copilot, already suggest parts of coding lines to developers. However, with the adoption of AI, this aspect of the software is expected to progress considerably.
There are concerns associated with AI-assisted IDEs, which help to complete a programmer's coding. This includes a threat to programming jobs. However, developers' jobs are not expected to be threatened by this feature soon. Moreover, such assistance in coding helps companies develop complex and feature-rich software, thereby increasing their competitiveness in the market. AI-assisted IDEs make the coding task easier and faster for developers. As a result of such advantages, companies are expected to incorporate artificial intelligence into IDE software during the forecast period.
Facebook
TwitterThis data package contains the National Correct Coding Initiative (NCCI), the procedure to procedure (PTP) edits, for outpatient hospitals as well as physicians/practitioners. The quarterly additions include information about the changes/additions in the PTP edit published files for the current quarter.
Facebook
TwitterMSZSI: Multi-Scale Zonal Statistics [AgriClimate] Inventory
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MSZSI is a data extraction tool for Google Earth Engine that aggregates time-series remote sensing information to multiple administrative levels using the FAO GAUL data layers. The code at the bottom of this page (metadata) can be pasted into the Google Earth Engine JavaScript code editor and ran at https://code.earthengine.google.com/.
Please refer to the associated publication:
Peter, B.G., Messina, J.P., Breeze, V., Fung, C.Y., Kapoor, A. and Fan, P., 2024. Perspectives on modifiable spatiotemporal unit problems in remote sensing of agriculture: evaluating rice production in Vietnam and tools for analysis. Frontiers in Remote Sensing, 5, p.1042624.
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/remote-sensing/articles/10.3389/frsen.2024.1042624
Input options:
[1] Country of interest
[2] Start and end year
[3] Start and end month
[4] Option to mask data to a specific land-use/land-cover type
[5] Land-use/land-cover type code from CGLS LULC
[6] Image collection for data aggregation
[7] Desired band from the image collection
[8] Statistics type for the zonal aggregations
[9] Statistic to use for annual aggregation
[10] Scaling options
[11] Export folder and label suffix
Output: Two CSVs containing zonal statistics for each of the FAO GAUL administrative level boundaries
Output fields: system:index, 0-ADM0_CODE, 0-ADM0_NAME, 0-ADM1_CODE, 0-ADM1_NAME, 0-ADMN_CODE, 0-ADMN_NAME, 1-AREA_PERCENT_LULC, 1-AREA_SQM_LULC, 1-AREA_SQM_ZONE, 2-X_2001, 2-X_2002, 2-X_2003, ..., 2-X_2020, .geo
PREPROCESSED DATA DOWNLOAD
The datasets available for download contain zonal statistics at 2 administrative levels (FAO GAUL levels 1 and 2). Select countries from Southeast Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa (Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao PDR, Myanmar, Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam, Burundi, Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique, Rwanda, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia, Zimbabwe) are included in the current version, with plans to extend the dataset to contain global metrics. Each zip file is described below and two example NDVI tables are available for preview.
Key: [source, data, units, temporal range, aggregation, masking, zonal statistic, notes]
Currently available:
MSZSI-V2_V-NDVI-MEAN.tar: [NASA-MODIS, NDVI, index, 2001–2020, annual mean, agriculture, mean, n/a]
MSZSI-V2_T-LST-DAY-MEAN.tar: [NASA-MODIS, LST Day, °C, 2001–2020, annual mean, agriculture, mean, n/a]
MSZSI-V2_T-LST-NIGHT-MEAN.tar: [NASA-MODIS, LST Night, °C, 2001–2020, annual mean, agriculture, mean, n/a]
MSZSI-V2_R-PRECIP-SUM.tar: [UCSB-CHG-CHIRPS, Precipitation, mm, 2001–2020, annual sum, agriculture, mean, n/a]
MSZSI-V2_S-BDENS-MEAN.tar: [OpenLandMap, Bulk density, g/cm3, static, n/a, agriculture, mean, at depths 0-10-30-60-100-200]
MSZSI-V2_S-ORGC-MEAN.tar: [OpenLandMap, Organic carbon, g/kg, static, n/a, agriculture, mean, at depths 0-10-30-60-100-200]
MSZSI-V2_S-PH-MEAN.tar: [OpenLandMap, pH in H2O, pH, static, n/a, agriculture, mean, at depths 0-10-30-60-100-200]
MSZSI-V2_S-WATER-MEAN.tar: [OpenLandMap, Soil water, % at 33kPa, static, n/a, agriculture, mean, at depths 0-10-30-60-100-200]
MSZSI-V2_S-SAND-MEAN.tar: [OpenLandMap, Sand, %, static, n/a, agriculture, mean, at depths 0-10-30-60-100-200]
MSZSI-V2_S-SILT-MEAN.tar: [OpenLandMap, Silt, %, static, n/a, agriculture, mean, at depths 0-10-30-60-100-200]
MSZSI-V2_S-CLAY-MEAN.tar: [OpenLandMap, Clay, %, static, n/a, agriculture, mean, at depths 0-10-30-60-100-200]
MSZSI-V2_E-ELEV-MEAN.tar: [MERIT, [elevation, slope, flowacc, HAND], [m, degrees, km2, m], static, n/a, agriculture, mean, n/a]
Coming soon
MSZSI-V2_C-STAX-MEAN.tar: [OpenLandMap, Soil taxonomy, category, static, n/a, agriculture, area sum, n/a]
MSZSI-V2_C-LULC-MEAN.tar: [CGLS-LC100-V3, LULC, category, 2015–2019, mode, none, area sum, n/a]
Data sources:
/*/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// MSZSI: Multi-Scale Zonal Statistics Inventory Authors: Brad G. Peter, Department of Geography, University of Alabama Joseph Messina, Department of Geography, University of Alabama Austin Raney, Department of Geography, University of Alabama Rodrigo E. Principe, AgriCircle AG Peilei Fan, Department of Geography, Environment, and Spatial Sciences, Michigan State University Citation: Peter, Brad; Messina, Joseph; Raney, Austin; Principe, Rodrigo; Fan, Peilei, 2021, 'MSZSI: Multi-Scale Zonal Statistics Inventory', https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/YCUBXS, Harvard Dataverse, V# SEAGUL: Southeast Asia Globalization, Urbanization, Land and Environment Changes http://seagul.info/ https://lcluc.umd.edu/projects/divergent-local-responses-globalization-urbanization-land-transition-and-environmental This project was made possible by the the NASA Land-Cover/Land-Use Change Program (Grant #: 80NSSC20K0740)
Facebook
TwitterThe Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS) is a household survey programme developed by UNICEF to assist countries in filling data gaps for monitoring human development in general and the situation of children and women in particular. MICS is capable of producing statistically sound, internationally comparable estimates of social indicators. The current round of MICS is focused on providing a monitoring tool for the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), the World Fit for Children (WFFC), as well as for other major international commitments, such as the United Nations General Assembly Special Session (UNGASS) on HIV/AIDS and the Abuja targets for malaria.
The 2006 Iraq Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey has as its primary objectives: - To provide up-to-date information for assessing the situation of children and women in Iraq; - To furnish data needed for monitoring progress toward goals established by the Millennium Development Goals and the goals of A World Fit For Children (WFFC) as a basis for future action; - To contribute to the improvement of data and monitoring systems in Iraq and to strengthen technical expertise in the design, implementation and analysis of such systems.
Survey Content MICS questionnaires are designed in a modular fashion that was customized to the needs of the country. They consist of a household questionnaire, a questionnaire for women aged 15-49 and a questionnaire for children under the age of five (to be administered to the mother or caretaker). Other than a set of core modules, countries can select which modules they want to include in each questionnaire.
Survey Implementation The survey was implemented by the Central Organization for Statistics and Information Technology (COSIT), the Kurdistan Region Statistics Office (KRSO) and Suleimaniya Statistical Directorate (SSD), in partnership with the Ministry of Health (MOH). The survey also received support and assistance of UNICEF and other partners. Technical assistance and training for the surveys was provided through a series of regional workshops, covering questionnaire content, sampling and survey implementation; data processing; data quality and data analysis; report writing and dissemination.
The survey is nationally representative and covers the whole of Iraq.
Households (defined as a group of persons who usually live and eat together)
De jure household members (defined as memers of the household who usually live in the household, which may include people who did not sleep in the household the previous night, but does not include visitors who slept in the household the previous night but do not usually live in the household)
Women aged 15-49
Children aged 0-4
The survey covered all de jure household members (usual residents), all women aged 15-49 years resident in the household, and all children aged 0-4 years (under age 5) resident in the household. The survey also includes a full birth history listing all chuldren ever born to ever-married women age 15-49 years.
Sample survey data [ssd]
The sample for the Iraq Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey was designed to provide estimates on a large number of indicators on the situation of children and women at the national level; for areas of residence of Iraq represented by rural and urban (metropolitan and other urban) areas; for the18 governorates of Iraq; and also for metropolitan, other urban, and rural areas for each governorate. Thus, in total, the sample consists of 56 different sampling domains, that includes 3 sampling domains in each of the 17 governorates outside the capital city Baghdad (namely, a metropolitan area domain representing the governorate city centre, an other urban area domain representing the urban area outside the governorate city centre, and a rural area domain) and 5 sampling domains in Baghdad (namely, 3 metropolitan areas representing Sadir City, Resafa side, and Kurkh side, an other urban area sampling domain representing the urban area outside the three Baghdad governorate city centres, and a sampling domain comprising the rural area of Baghdad).
The sample was selected in two stages. Within each of the 56 sampling domains, 54 PSUs were selected with linear systematic probability proportional to size (PPS).
\After mapping and listing of households were carried out within the selected PSU or segment of the PSU, linear systematic samples of six households were drawn. Cluster sizes of 6 households were selected to accommodate the current security conditions in the country to allow the surveys team to complete a full cluster in a minimal time. The total sample size for the survey is 18144 households. The sample is not self-weighting. For reporting national level results, sample weights are used.
The sampling procedures are more fully described in the sampling appendix of the final report and can also be found in the list of technical documents within this archive.
(Extracted from the final report: Central Organisation for Statistics & Information Technology and Kurdistan Statistics Office. 2007. Iraq Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey 2006, Final Report. Iraq.)
No major deviations from the original sample design were made. One cluster of the 3024 clusters selected was not completed all othe clusters were accessed.
Face-to-face [f2f]
The questionnaires were based on the third round of the Multiple Indicator Cluster survey model questionnaires. From the MICS-3 model English version, the questionnaires were revised and customized to suit local conditions and translated into Arabic and Kurdish languages. The Arabic language version of the questionnaire was pre-tested during January 2006 while the Kurdish language version was pre-tested during March 2006. Based on the results of the pre-test, modifications were made to the wording and translation of the questionnaires.
In addition to the administration of questionnaires, fieldwork teams tested the salt used for cooking in the households for iodine content, and measured the weights and heights of children age under-5 years.
Data were processed in clusters, with each cluster being processed as a complete unit through each stage of data processing. Each cluster goes through the following steps: 1) Questionnaire reception 2) Office editing and coding 3) Data entry 4) Structure and completeness checking 5) Verification entry 6) Comparison of verification data 7) Back up of raw data 8) Secondary editing 9) Edited data back up
After all clusters are processed, all data is concatenated together and then the following steps are completed for all data files: 10) Export to SPSS in 5 files (hh - household, hl - household members, wm - women age 15-49, ch - children under 5 bh - women age 15-49) 11) Recoding of variables needed for analysis 12) Adding of sample weights 13) Calculation of wealth quintiles and merging into data 14) Structural checking of SPSS files 15) Data quality tabulations 16) Production of analysis tabulations
Detailed documentation of the editing of data can be found in the data processing guidelines in the MICS Manual (http://www.childinfo.org/mics/mics3/manual.php)
Data entry was conducted by 12 data entry operators in tow shifts, supervised by 2 data entry supervisors, using a total of 7 computers (6 data entry computers plus one supervisors computer). All data entry was conducted at the GenCenStat head office using manual data entry. For data entry, CSPro version 2.6.007 was used with a highly structured data entry program, using system controlled approach, that controlled entry of each variable. All range checks and skips were controlled by the program and operators could not override these. A limited set of consistency checks were also included inthe data entry program. In addition, the calculation of anthropometric Z-scores was also included in the data entry programs for use during analysis. Open-ended responses ("Other" answers) were not entered or coded, except in rare circumstances where the response matched an existing code in the questionnaire.
Structure and completeness checking ensured that all questionnaires for the cluster had been entered, were structurally sound, and that women's and children's questionnaires existed for each eligible woman and child.
100% verification of all variables was performed using independent verification, i.e. double entry of data, with separate comparison of data followed by modification of one or both datasets to correct keying errors by original operators who first keyed the files.
After completion of all processing in CSPro, all individual cluster files were backed up before concatenating data together using the CSPro file concatenate utility.
Data editing took place at a number of stages throughout the processing (see Other processing), including: a) Office editing and coding b) During data entry c) Structure checking and completeness d) Secondary editing e) Structural checking of SPSS data files
Detailed documentation of the editing of data can be found in the data processing guidelines in the MICS Manual (http://www.childinfo.org/mics/mics3/manual.php)
Of the 18144 households selected for the sample, 18123 were found to be occupied. Of these, 17873 were successfully interviewed for a household response rate of 98.6 percent. In the interviewed households, 27564 women (age 15-49 years) were identified. Of these, 27186 were successfully interviewed, yielding a
Facebook
TwitterThe Private Farmer Survey(CROP) is part of the brainchild of the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) and is often referred to as Regular survey carried out on annual basis by the NBS over the years. In recent times, starting from 2004, there is a collaborative effort between the NBS and the CBN in 2004 and 2005 till now the collaboration incorporated Nigerian Communications commission (NCC). The main reason of for conducting the survey was to enable the collaborating agencies fulfil their mandate in the production of current and credible statistics, to monitor and evaluate the status of the economy and the various government programmes such as the National Economic Empowerment and Development Strategy (NEEDS) and the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs).
The collaborative survey also assured the elimination of conflicts in data generated by the different agencies and ensured a reliable, authentic national statistics for the country.
National
Household who engage in crop farming
The survey covered all the household members who were into crop production.
Sample survey data [ssd]
National Agricultural Sample Survey (Private Farmers Questionnaire Survey) samples were derived from the National Bureau of Statistics 2000/05 NISH sample design. The NISH employed a 2-stage, replicated and rotated cluster sample design with enumeration areas (EAs) as first stage sampling units [Primary Sampling Units (PSU)], while the housing units constituted the second stage sampling units [Secondary Sampling Units]. The housing units were the ultimate sampling units for the multi-subject survey.
The Private Farmers' Survey total sample size was 10,950 Farming Housing Units. In each State, the housing units were stratified into Farming and Non-Farming. Five housing units were systematically selected in each Enumeration Area. A sample size of 300 farming housing units was drawn from each State and 150 from FCT, Abuja. The total sample size of 10,950 could provide estimates at national and State levels.
For the NASS (Private Farmers), 5 farming housing Unit (FHUs) were selected systematically after stratifying the housing units into farming and non-farming housing units where all the holders within the selected farming housing units were interviewed using the private farmers questionnaires.
Estimation Procedures:
Let the probability of selecting the EA be fj and the probability of selecting the housing unit be fk. Then the product f = fjfk = 1 where fj = n and fk = h Wj k N H.
For NASS (Private Farmers)
^ n h Ys = N S FH S x s j k n j=1 m k=1
n m
= N FH S S xs j k n h j=1 k=1
n h
= Ws j k S S x s j k
j=1 k=1
^
Where Ys is the state Estimate
N = Total number of EAs in the 5th State
n = Selected number of EAs in 5th State
FH = Total number of farming housing units listed.
M = Selected number of farming housing units
Xsjk is the value of the element of farming housing unit (FHUs) in the kth housing unit of jth EA in the 8th State. Ws j k is the weight.
. National Estimate: ^ 37 ^ YN = S Ys s=1
^ ^
Where YN is the National Estimate and Ys is the state Estimate.
Variance Estimate (Jackknife Method)
To estimate variances using the Jackknife method will require forming replicate from the full sample by randomly eliminating one sample cluster [Enumeration Area (EA] at a time from a state containing k EAs, k replicated estimates are formed by eliminating one of these, at a time, and increasing the weight of the remaining (k-1) EAs by a factor of k/(k=1). This process is repeated for each EA.
For a given state or reporting domain, the estimate of the variance of a rate, r, is given by k Var(r ) = (Se)2 = 1 S (ri - r)2 where (Se) is the standard error, k is K(k-1) i=1
The number of EAs in the state of reporting domain.
r is the weighted estimate calculated from the entire sample of EAs in the state or reporting domain.
ri is equal to kr = (k-1) r(i) , where
r(i) is the re-weight estimate calculated from the reduced sample of k-1 EAs.
To obtain an estimate of the variance at a higher level, say, at the national level, the process is repeated over all states, with k redefined to refer to the total number of EAs (as opposed to the number in the states).
Face-to-face [f2f]
The questionnaire for the Private Farmers (CROP) is a structured questionnaire based on household characteristics with some modifications and additions.
DATA PROCESSING/ANALYSIS PLAN The data processing and analysis plan involved five main stages: training of data processing staff; manual editing and coding; development of data entry programme; data entry and editing and tabulation. Integrated Micro Prossor System (IMPS) and ACCESS software were used for data entry, Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) and Censuses and Surveys Processing System (CSPro) for editing and a combination of SPSS, Statistical Analysis Software (SAS) and EXCEL for table generation. The subject-matter specialists and computer personnel from the NBS and CBN implemented the data processing work. Tabulation Plans were equally developed by these officers for their areas and topics covered in the three-survey system used for the exercise. The data editing is in 2 phases namely manual editing before the data entry were done. This involved using editors at the various zones to manually edit and ensure consistency in the information on the questionnaire. The second editing is the computer editing, this is the cleaning of the already enterd data. The completed questionnaires were collated and edited manually (a) Office editing and coding were done by the editor using visul contro of the questionnaire before data entry (b) Imps was used to design the data entry template provided as external resource (c) Ten operator plus two suppervissor and two progammer were used (d) Ten machines were used for data entry (e) After data entry data entry supervisor runs fequency on each section to see that all the questionnaire were enterd (f) Conversion progarm was written to convert the data to spss also provided.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Modern programming languages are constantly evolving, introducing new language features and APIs to enhance software development practices. Software developers often face the tedious task of upgrading their codebase to new programming language versions. Recently, large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated potential in automating various code generation and editing tasks, suggesting their applicability in automating code upgrade. However, there exists no benchmark for evaluating the code upgrade ability of LLMs, as distilling code changes related to programming language evolution from real-world software repositories’ commit histories is a complex challenge.
In this work, we introduce CoUpJava, the first large-scale dataset for code upgrade, focusing on the code changes related to the evolution of Java. CoUpJava comprises 10,697 code upgrade samples, distilled from the commit histories of 1,379 open-source Java repositories and covering Java versions 7–23. The dataset is divided into two subsets: CoUpJava-Fine, which captures fine-grained method-level refactorings towards new language features; and CoUpJava-Coarse, which includes coarse-grained repository-level changes encompassing new language features, standard library APIs, and build configurations. Our proposed dataset provides high-quality samples by filtering irrelevant and noisy changes and verifying the compilability of upgraded code. Moreover, CoUpJava reveals diversity in code upgrade scenarios, ranging from small, fine-grained refactorings to large-scale repository modifications.
Facebook
TwitterApache License, v2.0https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
License information was derived automatically
Merged LeRobot Dataset
This dataset was created by merging multiple LeRobot datasets using the LeRobot merge tool.
Source Datasets
This merged dataset combines the following 3 datasets:
jackvial/koch_screwdriver_attach_orange_panel_1_e5 jackvial/koch_screwdriver_attach_orange_panel_29_e5 jackvial/koch_screwdriver_attach_orange_panel_30_e5
Dataset Statistics
Total Episodes: 15 Total Frames: 3173 Robot Type: koch_screwdriver_follower FPS: 30… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/jackvial/merge-editor-test.
Facebook
TwitterThe presence of adequate and current statistical data in various economic sectors that are considered essential for development planning, socio-economic policy formulation and economic analysis is vital in promoting the economic development of a country. Based on this general objective, the Central Statistical Agency (CSA) has been conducting surveys of various economic activities, of which, the annual Large and Medium Scale Manufacturing Industries survey is one.
Manufacturing is defined here according to International Standard Industrial Classification (ISIC Revision-3) as “the physical or chemical transformation of materials or components into new products, whether the work is performed by power-driven machines or by hand, whether it is done in a factory or in the worker’s home, and whether the products are sold at wholesale or retail. The assembly of the component parts of manufactured products is also considered as manufacturing activities.”
CSA has been publishing results of the survey of Manufacturing and Electricity Industries on annual basis since 1968 E.C. to provide users with reliable, comprehensive and timely statistical data on these sectors. In this respect, this survey, which is conducted on annual basis, is the principal source of industrial statistics on large and medium scale manufacturing industries in the country. In this edition value added in the national account concept at factor cost is replaced with value added in the national account concept at basic price. So as to comply with the current practice of System of National Account (SNA). As a result, the time serious data for the previous four years have also been adjusted. In addition to this the concept and data in respect of census value added is withdrawn from the report because its application is no more used in practice.
The main objectives of the annual survey of Large and Medium Scale Manufacturing and Electricity Industries are to:- 1. Obtain basic statistical data that are essential for policy makers, planners and researchers by major industrial group. 2. Collect basic quantitative information on employment, volume of production and raw materials, structure and performance of the country’s Large and Medium Scale Manufacturing and Electricity Industries. 3. Compile statistical data which will be an input to the System of National Accounts (SNA), on Large and Medium Scale Manufacturing and Electricity establishments as a whole and by major industrial group. 4. Obtain the number of proprietors engaged in these sectors and find out the major problems that create stumbling blocks for their activities.
National
Establishment/ Enterprise
The universe of the large and medium scale manufacturing survey is confined to those establishments which engaged 10 persons and above and use power-driven machines and covers both public and private industries in all Regions of the country.
Census/enumeration data [cen]
Not applicable - the survey enumerated all manufacturing industries/ enterprises that qualified as large and medium manufacturing industry category.
Face-to-face [f2f]
The questinnaire contains the following sections/ items:
Item 1.1. Adress of the establishments: This section has varibles that identify the questionnaire uniquely. The variables are; Killil, Zone, Wereda, Town, Higher, Kebele, House no, Year, ISIC, Establishmnet no, Eelephone no and P.O.Box codes or numbers.
Item 1.2. Address of Head Office if Separated From Factory: In this section information about factory head office is collected (if the factory is separated from the head office). The varibles used to collect the information are; Killil, Zone, Wereda, Town, Higher, Kebele, House no, Telephone no and P.O.Box.
Item 2. Basic Information About The Establishment: This section has questions related to basic information about the establishment.
Item 3.1. Number of Persons Engaged: This section has variables (questions) that used to collect establishment's employees number by employees occupation.
Item 3.2. Number of Persons Engaged by Educational Status: This section has varabils (questions) that used to collect establishment's employees number by their educational status.
Item 3.3. Number of Persons Engaged by Age Group: Contains variables that used to collect information about employees number by employees age group.
Item 3.4. Wages and Salaries and Other Employee Benefits Paid: This section has variables related to wages and other employees benefits by employee occupation.
Item 3.5. Number of Permanent Employees by Basic Salary Group: This section has variables related to salary groups by sex of employees
Item 4.1. Products and By-products: This section has questions related to product produced, produced quantity and sales.
Item 4.2. Service and Other Receipts: Contains questions related to income from different source other than selling the products.
Item 5. Value of Stocks: Contains questions that related to information about materials in the stock.
Item 6.1. Cost and Quantity of Raw Materials, Parts and Containers Used: This section has questions related to principal raw materials, raw material type, quantity, value and source (local or imported).
Item 6.2. Other Industrial Costs: This sections has questions related to other industrial costs including cost of energy and other expenses.
Item 6.3. Other Non-industrial Expenses: Contains questions related to non-industrial expenses like license fee, advertising, stationary, etc.
Item 6.4. Taxes Paid: This section has questions related to taxes like indirect tax and income tax.
Item 7. Fixed Assets and Investment: This section has questions related to fixed assets and investment on fixed assests and working capital.
Item 8.1. Annual Production at Full Capacity: This section has questions about quantity and value of products if the establishment uses its full capacity.
Item 8.2. Estimated Value and Quantity of Raw Materials Needed, at Full Capacity: This section has questions about the estimate of quantity and value of raw materials that needed to function at full capacity.
Item 8.3. The three major problems that prevented the establishment from operating at full capacity.
Item 8.4. The three major problems that are facing the establishment at present.
Editing, Coding and Verification: A number of quality control steps were taken to ensure the quality of data. The first step taken in this direction was, to revise the questionnaire, to make it easier for internal consistency checking or editing, both at field and office level. Furthermore, based on this revised questionnaire, revised instruction manual with field editing procedures was prepared in Amharic for both enumerators and supervisors (field editors). Using this manual, some editing and coding were carried out by field editors during the data collection stage. After the majority of the completed questionnaires were brought back to head office, final editing, coding and verification were performed by editors, statistical technicians and statisticians. Finally, the edited and coded questionnaires were checked and verified by other senior professionals.
Data Entry, Cleaning and Tabulation: The data were entered and verified on personal computers using CSpro (Census and Survey Processing System) Software. Twelve CSA data entry staff and one data cleaner participated in this activity for fifteen days with close supervision of the activities by two professionals. Then, the data entered were cleaned using personal computers in combination with manual cleaning for some serious errors. Finally, the tabulation of the results was processed using the same software by one programmer with technical assistance from Industry, Trade and Services Statistics Department staff.
Facebook
TwitterThe presence of adequate and current statistical data in various economic sectors that are considered essential for development planning, socio-economic policy formulation and economic analysis is vital in promoting the economic development of a country. Based on this general objective, the Central Statistical Agency (CSA) has been conducting surveys of various economic activities, of which, the annual Large and Medium Scale Manufacturing Industries survey is one.
Manufacturing is defined here according to International Standard Industrial Classification (ISIC Revision-3.1) as “the physical or chemical transformation of materials or components into new products, whether the work is performed by power-driven machines or by hand, whether it is done in a factory or in the worker's home, and whether the products are sold at wholesale or retail. The assembly of the component parts of manufactured products is also considered as manufacturing activities.”
CSA has been publishing results of the survey of Manufacturing and Electricity Industries on annual basis since 1968 Ethiopian Calendar to provide users with reliable, comprehensive and timely statistical data on these sectors. In this respect, this survey, which is conducted on annual basis, is the principal source of industrial statistics on large and medium scale manufacturing industries in the country.
The main objectives of the annual survey of Large and Medium Scale Manufacturing and Electricity Industries are to: 1.Obtain basic statistical data that are essential for policy makers, planners and researchers by major industrial group. 2.Collect basic quantitative information on employment, volume of quantitative information on employment, volume of production and raw materials, structure and performance of the country's Large and Medium Scale Manufacturing and Electricity Industries. 3.Compile statistical data which will be an input to the System of National Accounts (SNA), on Large and Medium Scale Manufacturing and Electricity establishments as a whole and by major industrial group. 4.Obtain the number of proprietors engaged in these sectors and find out the major problems that create stumbling blocks for their activities.
National
Establishment/ Enterprise
The universe of the large and medium scale manufacturing survey is confined to those establishments which engaged 10 persons and above and use power-driven machines and covers both public and private industries in all Regions of the country.
Census/enumeration data [cen]
Not applicable - the survey enumerated all manufacturing industries/ enterprises that qualified as large and medium manufacturing industry category.
Face-to-face [f2f]
The questinnaire contains the following sections/ items:
Item 1.1. Adress of the establishments: This section has varibles that identify the questionnaire uniquely. The variables are; Killil, Zone, Wereda, Town, Higher, Kebele, House no, Year, ISIC, Establishmnet no, Eelephone no and P.O.Box codes or numbers.
Item 1.2. Address of Head Office if Separated From Factory: In this section information about factory head office is collected (if the factory is separated from the head office). The varibles used to collect the information are; Killil, Zone, Wereda, Town, Higher, Kebele, House no, Telephone no and P.O.Box.
Item 2. Basic Information About The Establishment: This section has questions related to basic information about the establishment.
Item 3.1. Number of Persons Engaged: This section has variables (questions) that used to collect establishment's employees number by employees occupation.
Item 3.2. Number of Persons Engaged by Educational Status: This section has varabils (questions) that used to collect establishment's employees number by their educational status.
Item 3.3. Number of Persons Engaged by Age Group: Contains variables that used to collect information about employees number by employees age group.
Item 3.4. Wages and Salaries and Other Employee Benefits Paid: This section has variables related to wages and other employees benefits by employee occupation.
Item 3.5. Number of Permanent Employees by Basic Salary Group: This section has variables related to salary groups by sex of employees
Item 4.1. Products and By-products: This section has questions related to product produced, produced quantity and sales.
Item 4.2. Service and Other Receipts: Contains questions related to income from different source other than selling the products.
Item 5. Value of Stocks: Contains questions that related to information about materials in the stock.
Item 6.1. Cost and Quantity of Raw Materials, Parts and Containers Used: This section has questions related to principal raw materials, raw material type, quantity, value and source (local or imported).
Item 6.2. Other Industrial Costs: This sections has questions related to other industrial costs including cost of energy and other expenses.
Item 6.3. Other Non-industrial Expenses: Contains questions related to non-industrial expenses like license fee, advertising, stationary, etc.
Item 6.4. Taxes Paid: This section has questions related to taxes like indirect tax and income tax.
Item 7. Fixed Assets and Investment: This section has questions related to fixed assets and investment on fixed assests and working capital.
Item 8.1. Annual Production at Full Capacity: This section has questions about quantity and value of products if the establishment uses its full capacity.
Item 8.2. Estimated Value and Quantity of Raw Materials Needed, at Full Capacity: This section has questions about the estimate of quantity and value of raw materials that needed to function at full capacity.
Item 8.3. The three major problems that prevented the establishment from operating at full capacity.
Item 8.4. The three major problems that are facing the establishment at present.
Editing, Coding and Verification: A number of quality control steps were taken to ensure the quality of data. The first step taken in this direction was, to revise the questionnaire, to make it easier for internal consistency checking or editing, both at field and office level. Furthermore, based on this revised questionnaire, revised instruction manual with field editing procedures were prepared in Amharic for both enumerators and supervisors (field editors). Using this manual, some editing and coding were carried out by field editors during the data collection stage.
After the majority of the completed questionnaires were brought back to head office, final editing, coding and verification were performed by editors, statistical technicians and statisticians. Finally, the edited and coded questionnaires were checked and verified by other senior professionals.
Data Entry, Cleaning and Tabulation: The data were entered and verified on personal computers using CSpro (Census and Survey Processing System) Software. Fifteen CSA data entry staff and one data cleaner participated in this activity for fifteen days with close supervision of the activities by two professionals. Then, the data entered were cleaned hundred percent using personal computers in combination with manual cleaning for some serious errors. Finally, the tabulation of the results was processed using the same software by one programmer with technical assistance from Industry, Trade and Services Statistics Department staff.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.couponbirds.com/us/terms-of-usehttps://www.couponbirds.com/us/terms-of-use
Weekly statistics showing how many FOUR Editors coupon codes were verified by the CouponBirds team. This dataset reflects real-time coupon validation activity to ensure coupon accuracy and reliability.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.wiseguyreports.com/pages/privacy-policyhttps://www.wiseguyreports.com/pages/privacy-policy
| BASE YEAR | 2024 |
| HISTORICAL DATA | 2019 - 2023 |
| REGIONS COVERED | North America, Europe, APAC, South America, MEA |
| REPORT COVERAGE | Revenue Forecast, Competitive Landscape, Growth Factors, and Trends |
| MARKET SIZE 2024 | 44.4(USD Billion) |
| MARKET SIZE 2025 | 47.4(USD Billion) |
| MARKET SIZE 2035 | 90.0(USD Billion) |
| SEGMENTS COVERED | Programming Language Type, Application Domain, End User, Development Environment, Regional |
| COUNTRIES COVERED | US, Canada, Germany, UK, France, Russia, Italy, Spain, Rest of Europe, China, India, Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, Rest of APAC, Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, Rest of South America, GCC, South Africa, Rest of MEA |
| KEY MARKET DYNAMICS | Rapid technological advancements, Increasing demand for automation, Rise of data science, Growth in cloud computing, Expanding developer community |
| MARKET FORECAST UNITS | USD Billion |
| KEY COMPANIES PROFILED | Amazon, Atlassian, SAP, Google, Zoho, Microsoft, Salesforce, VMware, Adobe, Red Hat, NVIDIA, Accenture, IBM, Oracle, JetBrains |
| MARKET FORECAST PERIOD | 2025 - 2035 |
| KEY MARKET OPPORTUNITIES | AI-driven coding assistants, Rise of low-code platforms, Increased demand for cybersecurity languages, Growth in cloud-native development, Expanding educational programming resources |
| COMPOUND ANNUAL GROWTH RATE (CAGR) | 6.7% (2025 - 2035) |
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.marketreportanalytics.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.marketreportanalytics.com/privacy-policy
The global code editor market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing demand for software development across various industries and the rising adoption of cloud-based solutions. The market's expansion is fueled by several key factors, including the proliferation of mobile and web applications, the growth of big data analytics, and the increasing need for efficient and collaborative software development processes. The shift towards Agile and DevOps methodologies further accelerates the demand for sophisticated code editors offering features like integrated debugging, version control integration, and collaborative coding capabilities. While the on-premise deployment model still holds a significant share, the web-based segment is witnessing exponential growth due to its accessibility, scalability, and cost-effectiveness. The competitive landscape is characterized by a mix of established players like Microsoft and Sublime HQ, alongside open-source communities contributing significantly to the market's dynamism. The market is segmented by application (personal and enterprise use) and deployment type (on-premise and web-based). Enterprise adoption is a major driver, with large organizations investing heavily in code editor solutions to enhance developer productivity and streamline their software development lifecycles. Future growth will be significantly impacted by advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) integrated into code editors offering features like intelligent code completion, bug detection, and automated refactoring. The market is geographically diverse, with North America and Europe currently holding the largest market share due to the high concentration of tech companies and skilled developers. However, regions like Asia Pacific are experiencing rapid growth, fueled by increasing digitalization and a burgeoning IT sector. Challenges facing the market include the need for continuous updates to keep pace with evolving programming languages and frameworks, ensuring security and data protection within collaborative coding environments, and addressing the skills gap in software development. Despite these challenges, the long-term outlook for the code editor market remains positive, driven by consistent technological advancements and the ever-increasing reliance on software solutions across all sectors of the global economy. We project sustained growth throughout the forecast period (2025-2033), fueled by continuous innovation and expanding adoption across diverse industries and geographies.