The Delta Neighborhood Physical Activity Study was an observational study designed to assess characteristics of neighborhood built environments associated with physical activity. It was an ancillary study to the Delta Healthy Sprouts Project and therefore included towns and neighborhoods in which Delta Healthy Sprouts participants resided. The 12 towns were located in the Lower Mississippi Delta region of Mississippi. Data were collected via electronic surveys between August 2016 and September 2017 using the Rural Active Living Assessment (RALA) tools and the Community Park Audit Tool (CPAT). Scale scores for the RALA Programs and Policies Assessment and the Town-Wide Assessment were computed using the scoring algorithms provided for these tools via SAS software programming. The Street Segment Assessment and CPAT do not have associated scoring algorithms and therefore no scores are provided for them. Because the towns were not randomly selected and the sample size is small, the data may not be generalizable to all rural towns in the Lower Mississippi Delta region of Mississippi. Dataset one contains data collected with the RALA Programs and Policies Assessment (PPA) tool. Dataset two contains data collected with the RALA Town-Wide Assessment (TWA) tool. Dataset three contains data collected with the RALA Street Segment Assessment (SSA) tool. Dataset four contains data collected with the Community Park Audit Tool (CPAT). [Note : title changed 9/4/2020 to reflect study name] Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Dataset One RALA PPA Data Dictionary. File Name: RALA PPA Data Dictionary.csvResource Description: Data dictionary for dataset one collected using the RALA PPA tool.Resource Software Recommended: Microsoft Excel,url: https://products.office.com/en-us/excel Resource Title: Dataset Two RALA TWA Data Dictionary. File Name: RALA TWA Data Dictionary.csvResource Description: Data dictionary for dataset two collected using the RALA TWA tool.Resource Software Recommended: Microsoft Excel,url: https://products.office.com/en-us/excel Resource Title: Dataset Three RALA SSA Data Dictionary. File Name: RALA SSA Data Dictionary.csvResource Description: Data dictionary for dataset three collected using the RALA SSA tool.Resource Software Recommended: Microsoft Excel,url: https://products.office.com/en-us/excel Resource Title: Dataset Four CPAT Data Dictionary. File Name: CPAT Data Dictionary.csvResource Description: Data dictionary for dataset four collected using the CPAT.Resource Software Recommended: Microsoft Excel,url: https://products.office.com/en-us/excel Resource Title: Dataset One RALA PPA. File Name: RALA PPA Data.csvResource Description: Data collected using the RALA PPA tool.Resource Software Recommended: Microsoft Excel,url: https://products.office.com/en-us/excel Resource Title: Dataset Two RALA TWA. File Name: RALA TWA Data.csvResource Description: Data collected using the RALA TWA tool.Resource Software Recommended: Microsoft Excel,url: https://products.office.com/en-us/excel Resource Title: Dataset Three RALA SSA. File Name: RALA SSA Data.csvResource Description: Data collected using the RALA SSA tool.Resource Software Recommended: Microsoft Excel,url: https://products.office.com/en-us/excel Resource Title: Dataset Four CPAT. File Name: CPAT Data.csvResource Description: Data collected using the CPAT.Resource Software Recommended: Microsoft Excel,url: https://products.office.com/en-us/excel Resource Title: Data Dictionary. File Name: DataDictionary_RALA_PPA_SSA_TWA_CPAT.csvResource Description: This is a combined data dictionary from each of the 4 dataset files in this set.

At CompanyData.com (BoldData), we provide direct access to comprehensive, verified retail company data from around the world—available in easy-to-use Excel files. With a curated list of 38 million retail companies, our database is built on official trade registers, ensuring accuracy, compliance, and depth. Whether you're targeting retailers globally or analyzing markets, our dataset is a reliable foundation for your business strategies.

Each record includes detailed company information such as legal entity details, industry codes, company hierarchies, contact names, direct emails, phone numbers (including mobile when available), and firmographics like revenue, size, and geography. The data is continuously updated, fully GDPR-compliant, and meticulously verified, making it ideal for precise targeting, compliance tasks, and strategic outreach.

Our retail company data serves a wide range of industries and use cases, including KYC verification, compliance checks, global sales prospecting, multichannel marketing, CRM enrichment, and AI model training. Whether you're mapping retail supply chains or launching a new product globally, our data ensures you're connecting with the right companies at the right time.

Delivery is simple and scalable: receive tailored Excel files, access our self-service platform, integrate via real-time API, or enhance your existing records through our data enrichment services. With coverage of 380 million verified companies across all sectors and regions, CompanyData.com (BoldData) empowers your business with the global retail insights needed to thrive in a fast-moving market.

Ahoy, data enthusiasts! Join us for a hands-on workshop where you will hoist your sails and navigate through the Statistics Canada website, uncovering hidden treasures in the form of data tables. With the wind at your back, you’ll master the art of downloading these invaluable Stats Can datasets while braving the occasional squall of data cleaning challenges using Excel with your trusty captains Vivek and Lucia at the helm.

The SMARTDEST DATASET WP3 v1.0 includes data at sub-city level for 7 cities: Amsterdam, Barcelona, Edinburgh, Lisbon, Ljubljana, Turin, and Venice. It is made up of information extracted from public sources at the local level (mostly, city council open data portals) or volunteered geographic information, that is, geospatial content generated by non-professionals using mapping systems available on the Internet (e.g., Geofabrik). Details on data sources and variables are included in a ‘metadata’ spreadsheet in the excel file. The same excel file contains 5 additional spreadsheets. The first one, labelled #1, was used to perform the analysis on the determinants of the geographical spread of tourism supply in SMARTDEST case study’s cities (in the main document D3.3, section 4.1), The second one (labelled #2) offers information that would allow to replicate the analysis on tourism-led population decline reported in section 4.3. As for spreadsheets named #3-AMS, #4-BCN, and #5-EDI, they refer to data sources and variables used to run follow-up analyses discussed in section 5.1, with the objective of digging into the causes of depopulation in Amsterdam, Barcelona, and Edinburgh, respectively. The column ‘row’ can be used to merge the excel file with the shapefile ‘db_task3.3_SmartDest’. Data are available at the buurt level in Amsterdam (an administrative unit roughly corresponding to a neighbourhood), census tract level in Barcelona and Ljubljana, for data zones in Edinburgh, statistical zones in Turin, and località in Venice.

Population model survival and fecundity data in spreadsheet formatFecundity and survival data on Petroica longipes collected in the field at Tawharanui Regional Park, New Zealand. Fecundity and survival components of the model are on separate sheets and abbreviations are explained in the internal cell comments. Full understanding of how the data was modelled requires reading the spreadsheet with the model and its respective annotations in Appendix S3.Spreadsheet of Popn Model data.xlsx

We present a perspective on drug development for the synthesis of an active pharmaceutical ingredient (e.g., agomelatine) within a commercial technology called Luminata and compare the results to the current method of consolidating the reaction data into Microsoft Excel. The Excel document becomes the ultimate repository of information extracted from multiple sources such as the electronic lab notebook, the laboratory information management system, the chromatography data system, in-house databases, and external data. The major needs of a pharmaceutical company are tracking the stages of multiple reactions, calculating the impurity carryover across the stages, and performing structure dereplication for an unknown impurity. As there is no standardized software available to link the different needs throughout the life cycle of process development, there is a demand for mapping tools to consolidate the route for an API synthesis and link it with analytical data while reducing transcription errors and maintaining an audit trail.

A dataset providing information of the vehicle types and counts in several locations in Leeds. Purpose of the project The aim of this work was to examine the profile of vehicle types in Leeds, in order to compare local emissions with national predictions. Traffic was monitored for a period of one week at two Inner Ring Road locations in April 2016 and at seven sites around the city in June 2016. The vehicle registration data was then sent to the Department for Transport (Dft), who combined it with their vehicle type data, replacing the registration number with an anonymised ‘Unique ID’. The data is provided in three folders:- Raw Data – contains the data in the format it was received, and a sample of each format. Processed Data – the data after processing by LCC, lookup tables, and sample data. Outputs – Excel spreadsheets summarising the data for each site, for various time/dates. Initially a dataset was received for the Inner Ring Road (see file “IRR ANPR matched to DFT vehicle type list.csv”), with vehicle details, but with missing / uncertain data on the vehicles emissions Eurostandard class. Of the 820,809 recorded journeys, from the pseudo registration number field (UniqueID) it was determined that there were 229,891 unique vehicles, and 31,912 unique “vehicle types” based on the unique concatenated vehicle description fields. It was therefore decided to import the data into an MS Access database, create a table of vehicle types, and to add the necessary fields/data so that combined with the year of manufacture / vehicle registration, the appropriate Eurostandard could be determined for the particular vehicle. The criteria for the Eurostandards was derived mainly from www.dieselnet.com and summarised in a spreadsheet (“EuroStandards.xlsx”). Vehicle types were assigned to a “VehicleClass” (see “Lookup Tables.xlsx”) and “EU class” with additional fields being added for any modified data (Gross Vehicle Weight – “GVM_Mod”; Engine capacity – “EngineCC_mod”; No of passenger seats – “PassSeats”; and Kerb weight – “KerbWt”). Missing data was added from the internet lookups, extrapolation from known data, and by association – eg 99% of cars with an engine size Additional data was then received from the Inner Ring Road site, giving journey date/time and incorporating the Taxi data for licensed taxis in Leeds. Similar data for Sites 1-7 was also then received, and processed to determine the “VehicleClass” and “EU class”. A mixture of Update queries, and VBA processing was then used to provide the Level 1-6 breakdown of vehicle types (see “Lookup Tables.xlsx”). The data was then combined into one database, so that the required Excel spreadsheets could be exported for the required time/date periods (see “outputs” folder).

General overview
The following datasets are described by this metadata record, and are available for download from the provided URL.

- Raw log files, physical parameters raw log files
- Raw excel files, respiration/PAM chamber raw excel spreadsheets
- Processed and cleaned excel files, respiration chamber biomass data
- Raw rapid light curve excel files (this is duplicated from Raw log files), combined dataset pH, temperature, oxygen, salinity, velocity for experiment
- Associated R script file for pump cycles of respirations chambers

####

Physical parameters raw log files

Raw log files
1) DATE=
2) Time= UTC+11
3) PROG=Automated program to control sensors and collect data
4) BAT=Amount of battery remaining
5) STEP=check aquation manual
6) SPIES=check aquation manual
7) PAR=Photoactive radiation
8) Levels=check aquation manual
9) Pumps= program for pumps
10) WQM=check aquation manual

####

Respiration/PAM chamber raw excel spreadsheets

Abbreviations in headers of datasets
Note: Two data sets are provided in different formats. Raw and cleaned (adj). These are the same data with the PAR column moved over to PAR.all for analysis. All headers are the same. The cleaned (adj) dataframe will work with the R syntax below, alternative add code to do cleaning in R.

Date: ISO 1986 - Check
Time:UTC+11 unless otherwise stated
DATETIME: UTC+11 unless otherwise stated
ID (of instrument in respiration chambers)
ID43=Pulse amplitude fluoresence measurement of control
ID44=Pulse amplitude fluoresence measurement of acidified chamber
ID=1 Dissolved oxygen
ID=2 Dissolved oxygen
ID3= PAR
ID4= PAR
PAR=Photo active radiation umols
F0=minimal florescence from PAM
Fm=Maximum fluorescence from PAM
Yield=(F0 – Fm)/Fm
rChl=an estimate of chlorophyll (Note this is uncalibrated and is an estimate only)
Temp=Temperature degrees C
PAR=Photo active radiation
PAR2= Photo active radiation2
DO=Dissolved oxygen
%Sat= Saturation of dissolved oxygen
Notes=This is the program of the underwater submersible logger with the following abreviations:
Notes-1) PAM=
Notes-2) PAM=Gain level set (see aquation manual for more detail)
Notes-3) Acclimatisation= Program of slowly introducing treatment water into chamber
Notes-4) Shutter start up 2 sensors+sample…= Shutter PAMs automatic set up procedure (see aquation manual)
Notes-5) Yield step 2=PAM yield measurement and calculation of control
Notes-6) Yield step 5= PAM yield measurement and calculation of acidified
Notes-7) Abatus respiration DO and PAR step 1= Program to measure dissolved oxygen and PAR (see aquation manual). Steps 1-4 are different stages of this program including pump cycles, DO and PAR measurements.

8) Rapid light curve data
Pre LC: A yield measurement prior to the following measurement
After 10.0 sec at 0.5% to 8%: Level of each of the 8 steps of the rapid light curve
Odessey PAR (only in some deployments): An extra measure of PAR (umols) using an Odessey data logger
Dataflow PAR: An extra measure of PAR (umols) using a Dataflow sensor.
PAM PAR: This is copied from the PAR or PAR2 column
PAR all: This is the complete PAR file and should be used
Deployment: Identifying which deployment the data came from

####

Respiration chamber biomass data

The data is chlorophyll a biomass from cores from the respiration chambers. The headers are: Depth (mm) Treat (Acidified or control) Chl a (pigment and indicator of biomass) Core (5 cores were collected from each chamber, three were analysed for chl a), these are psudoreplicates/subsamples from the chambers and should not be treated as replicates.

####

Associated R script file for pump cycles of respirations chambers

Associated respiration chamber data to determine the times when respiration chamber pumps delivered treatment water to chambers. Determined from Aquation log files (see associated files). Use the chamber cut times to determine net production rates. Note: Users need to avoid the times when the respiration chambers are delivering water as this will give incorrect results. The headers that get used in the attached/associated R file are start regression and end regression. The remaining headers are not used unless called for in the associated R script. The last columns of these datasets (intercept, ElapsedTimeMincoef) are determined from the linear regressions described below.

To determine the rate of change of net production, coefficients of the regression of oxygen consumption in discrete 180 minute data blocks were determined. R squared values for fitted regressions of these coefficients were consistently high (greater than 0.9). We make two assumptions with calculation of net production rates: the first is that heterotrophic community members do not change their metabolism under OA; and the second is that the heterotrophic communities are similar between treatments.

####

Combined dataset pH, temperature, oxygen, salinity, velocity for experiment

This data is rapid light curve data generated from a Shutter PAM fluorimeter. There are eight steps in each rapid light curve. Note: The software component of the Shutter PAM fluorimeter for sensor 44 appeared to be damaged and would not cycle through the PAR cycles. Therefore the rapid light curves and recovery curves should only be used for the control chambers (sensor ID43).

The headers are
PAR: Photoactive radiation
relETR: F0/Fm x PAR
Notes: Stage/step of light curve
Treatment: Acidified or control


The associated light treatments in each stage. Each actinic light intensity is held for 10 seconds, then a saturating pulse is taken (see PAM methods).

After 10.0 sec at 0.5% = 1 umols PAR
After 10.0 sec at 0.7% = 1 umols PAR
After 10.0 sec at 1.1% = 0.96 umols PAR
After 10.0 sec at 1.6% = 4.32 umols PAR
After 10.0 sec at 2.4% = 4.32 umols PAR
After 10.0 sec at 3.6% = 8.31 umols PAR
After 10.0 sec at 5.3% =15.78 umols PAR
After 10.0 sec at 8.0% = 25.75 umols PAR

This dataset appears to be missing data, note D5 rows potentially not useable information

See the word document in the download file for more information.

Introduction : Equations can calculate pulse wave velocity (ePWV) from blood pressure values (BP) and age. The ePWV predicts cardiovascular events beyond carotid-femoral PWV. We aimed to evaluate the correlation between four different equations to calculate ePWV. Methods: The ePWV was estimated utilizing mean BP (MBP) from office BP (MBPOBP) or 24-hour ambulatory BP (MBP24-hBP). We separated the whole sample into two groups: individuals with risk factors and healthy individuals. The e-PWV was calculated as follows:  We calculated the concordance correlation coefficient (Pc) between e1-PWVOBP vs e2-PWVOBP, e1-PWV24-hBP vs e2-PWV24-hBP, and mean values of e1-PWVOBP, e2-PWVOBP, e1-PWV24-hBP, and e2-PWV24-hBP . The multilevel regression model determined how much the ePWVs are influenced by age and MBP values. Results: We analyzed data from 1541 individuals; 1374 ones with risk factors and 167 healthy ones. The values are presented for the entire sample, for risk-factor patients and for he..., This study is a secondary analysis of data obtained from two cross-sectional studies conducted at a specialized center in Brazil to diagnose and treat non-communicable diseases. In both studies, the inclusion criteria were adults aged 18 years and above, referred to undergo ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) due to suspected non-treated or uncontrolled hypertension following initial blood pressure measurements by a physician. The combined databases included 1541 people. For the first database, we recruited participants between 28 January and 13 December 2013, and for the second database, between 23 January 2016 and 28 June 2019. Prior to being fitted with an AMBP device and assisted by a trained nurse, all participants signed a written consent form to partake in the research. Later, the nurse collected demographic and clinical data, including any previous reports of clinical cardiovascular disease (CVD), acute myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, coronary or other a..., , # ePWV_PLOS_ONE

Give a brief summary of dataset contents, contextualized in experimental procedures and results.

Description of the data and file structure

The database includes variables from two other databases. We collected only the interest variables of the manuscript from them. The ePWV_PLOS_ONE database presents all the data described in the paper. We used Microsoft Excel Worksheet version 2013 to include the data. The spreadsheet has 36 columns (A to AI) and 1542 rows (2 to 1542). The ePWV_PLOS_ONE contains two spreadsheets, DATABASE and LEGENDS. DATABASE presents all data from 1541 subjects. The LEGENDS spreadsheet describes the meaning of variable abbreviations.

Sharing/Access information

Data was derived from the following sources:

• see Related Works

Code/Software

n/a

Analyzing sales data is essential for any business looking to make informed decisions and optimize its operations. In this project, we will utilize Microsoft Excel and Power Query to conduct a comprehensive analysis of Superstore sales data. Our primary objectives will be to establish meaningful connections between various data sheets, ensure data quality, and calculate critical metrics such as the Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) and discount values. Below are the key steps and elements of this analysis:

1- Data Import and Transformation:

• Gather and import relevant sales data from various sources into Excel.
• Utilize Power Query to clean, transform, and structure the data for analysis.
• Merge and link different data sheets to create a cohesive dataset, ensuring that all data fields are connected logically.

2- Data Quality Assessment:

• Perform data quality checks to identify and address issues like missing values, duplicates, outliers, and data inconsistencies.
• Standardize data formats and ensure that all data is in a consistent, usable state.

3- Calculating COGS:

• Determine the Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) for each product sold by considering factors like purchase price, shipping costs, and any additional expenses.
• Apply appropriate formulas and calculations to determine COGS accurately.

4- Discount Analysis:

• Analyze the discount values offered on products to understand their impact on sales and profitability.
• Calculate the average discount percentage, identify trends, and visualize the data using charts or graphs.

5- Sales Metrics:

• Calculate and analyze various sales metrics, such as total revenue, profit margins, and sales growth.
• Utilize Excel functions to compute these metrics and create visuals for better insights.

6- Visualization:

• Create visualizations, such as charts, graphs, and pivot tables, to present the data in an understandable and actionable format.
• Visual representations can help identify trends, outliers, and patterns in the data.

7- Report Generation:

• Compile the findings and insights into a well-structured report or dashboard, making it easy for stakeholders to understand and make informed decisions.

Throughout this analysis, the goal is to provide a clear and comprehensive understanding of the Superstore's sales performance. By using Excel and Power Query, we can efficiently manage and analyze the data, ensuring that the insights gained contribute to the store's growth and success.

AbstractThe dataset provided here contains the efforts of independent data aggregation, quality control, and visualization of the University of Arizona (UofA) COVID-19 testing programs for the 2019 novel Coronavirus pandemic. The dataset is provided in the form of machine-readable tables in comma-separated value (.csv) and Microsoft Excel (.xlsx) formats.Additional InformationAs part of the UofA response to the 2019-20 Coronavirus pandemic, testing was conducted on students, staff, and faculty prior to start of the academic year and throughout the school year. These testings were done at the UofA Campus Health Center and through their instance program called "Test All Test Smart" (TATS). These tests identify active cases of SARS-nCoV-2 infections using the reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test and the Antigen test. Because the Antigen test provided more rapid diagnosis, it was greatly used three weeks prior to the start of the Fall semester and throughout the academic year.As these tests were occurring, results were provided on the COVID-19 websites. First, beginning in early March, the Campus Health Alerts website reported the total number of positive cases. Later, numbers were provided for the total number of tests (March 12 and thereafter). According to the website, these numbers were updated daily for positive cases and weekly for total tests. These numbers were reported until early September where they were then included in the reporting for the TATS program.For the TATS program, numbers were provided through the UofA COVID-19 Update website. Initially on August 21, the numbers provided were the total number (July 31 and thereafter) of tests and positive cases. Later (August 25), additional information was provided where both PCR and Antigen testings were available. Here, the daily numbers were also included. On September 3, this website then provided both the Campus Health and TATS data. Here, PCR and Antigen were combined and referred to as "Total", and daily and cumulative numbers were provided.At this time, no official data dashboard was available until September 16, and aside from the information provided on these websites, the full dataset was not made publicly available. As such, the authors of this dataset independently aggregated data from multiple sources. These data were made publicly available through a Google Sheet with graphical illustration provided through the spreadsheet and on social media. The goal of providing the data and illustrations publicly was to provide factual information and to understand the infection rate of SARS-nCoV-2 in the UofA community.Because of differences in reported data between Campus Health and the TATS program, the dataset provides Campus Health numbers on September 3 and thereafter. TATS numbers are provided beginning on August 14, 2020.Description of Dataset ContentThe following terms are used in describing the dataset.1. "Report Date" is the date and time in which the website was updated to reflect the new numbers2. "Test Date" is to the date of testing/sample collection3. "Total" is the combination of Campus Health and TATS numbers4. "Daily" is to the new data associated with the Test Date5. "To Date (07/31--)" provides the cumulative numbers from 07/31 and thereafter6. "Sources" provides the source of information. The number prior to the colon refers to the number of sources. Here, "UACU" refers to the UA COVID-19 Update page, and "UARB" refers to the UA Weekly Re-Entry Briefing. "SS" and "WBM" refers to screenshot (manually acquired) and "Wayback Machine" (see Reference section for links) with initials provided to indicate which author recorded the values. These screenshots are available in the records.zip file.The dataset is distinguished where available by the testing program and the methods of testing. Where data are not available, calculations are made to fill in missing data (e.g., extrapolating backwards on the total number of tests based on daily numbers that are deemed reliable). Where errors are found (by comparing to previous numbers), those are reported on the above Google Sheet with specifics noted.For inquiries regarding the contents of this dataset, please contact the Corresponding Author listed in the README.txt file. Administrative inquiries (e.g., removal requests, trouble downloading, etc.) can be directed to data-management@arizona.edu

A dataset of all the meta-data for all of the datasets available through the data.gov.uk service. This is provided as a zipped CSV or JSON file. It is published nightly.

Updates: 27 Sep 2017: we've moved all the previous dumps to an S3 bucket at https://dgu-ckan-metadata-dumps.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/ - This link is now listed here as a data file.

From 13/10/16 we added .v2.jsonl dump, which is set to replace the .json dump (which will be discontinued after a 3 month transition). This is produced using 'ckanapi dump'. It provides an enhanced version of each dataset ('validated', or what you get from package_show in CKAN API v3 - the old json was the unvalidated version). This now includes full details of the organization the dataset is in, rather than just the owner_id. Plus it includes the results of the archival & qa for each dataset and resource, showing whether the link is broken, detected format and stars of openness. It also benefits from being json lines http://jsonlines.org/ format, so you don't need to load the whole thing into memory to parse the json - just a line at a time.

On 12/1/2015 the organizations of the CSV was changed:

• Before this date, each dataset was one line, and resources added as numbered columns. Since a dataset may have up to 300 resources, it ends up with 1025 columns, which is wider than many versions of Excel and Libreoffice will open. And the uncompressed size of 170Mb is more than most will deal with too. It is suggested you load it into a database, ahandle it with a python or ruby script, or use tools such as Refine or Google Fusion Tables.

• After this date, the datasets are provided in one CSV and resources in another. On occasions that you want to join them, you can join them using the (dataset) "Name" column. These are now manageable in spreadsheet software.

You can also use the standard CKAN API if you want to search or get a small section of the data. Please respect the traffic limits in the API: http://data.gov.uk/terms-and-conditions

The dataset for this study was assembled by collecting all peer-reviewed publications from March 2000 to April 2024 using the Web of Science, SCOPUS, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases. The bibliographic retrieval process preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA), with specific search terms used titles, keywords, and abstracts: ("NBPT" OR "N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide") AND ("DMPP" OR "3,4-dimethylepyrazole phosphate" OR "DCD" OR "dicyandiamide"). Based on the inclusion criteria, 261 experimental sites from 41 countries were selected for meta-analysis (Fig. 1). Â The selection criteria were based on the following: (1) inclusion of only field observations, excluding pot and laboratory experiments; (2) experiments using urea as the base fertilizer; (3) comparison of the efficacy of individual inhibitors with combination inhibitors to determine cost-effective; (4) inclusion of treatment replicates (a minimum of three); (5) measurem..., , , # Global meta-analysis of individual and combined nitrogen inhibitors: enhancing plant productivity and reducing environmental losses

https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.1vhhmgr4d

This dataset serves the article "Global meta-analysis of individual and combined nitrogen inhibitors: enhancing plant productivity and reducing environmental losses" from the Global Change Biology, containing data of the inhibitor use effects under 285 different treatments extracted from 41 studies. The meanings represented by different abbreviations are shown in the “Abbreviation†.

The “Data†table contains data on pH type, soil texture type, nitrification inhibitors type, urease inhibitors type, N application rate type, cropping system classified type, soil organic carbon type and environmental impact variables, including mean annual temperature (MAT) and local mean annual precipitation (MAP) extracted from 41 studies.

“Data sources†table are the 41 studies from whic...

"SHRP 2 initiated the L38 project to pilot test products from five of the program’s completed projects. The products support reliability estimation and use based on data analyses, analytical techniques, and decision-making framework. The L38 project has two main objectives: (1) to assist agencies in using travel time reliability as a measure in their business practices and (2) to receive feedback from the project research teams on the applicability and usefulness of the products tested, along with their suggested possible refinements. SHRP 2 selected four teams from California, Minnesota, Florida, and Washington. Project L38C tested elements from Projects L02, L05, L07, and L08. Project L02 identified methods to collect, archive, and integrate required data for reliability estimation and methods for analyzing and visualizing the causes of unreliability based on the collected data. Projects L07 and L08 produced analytical techniques and tools for estimating reliability based on developed models and allowing the estimation of reliability and the impacts on reliability of alternative mitigating strategies. Project L05 provided guidance regarding how to use reliability assessments to support the business processes of transportation agencies. The datasets in this zip file, which is 7.83 MB in size, support of SHRP 2 reliability project L38C, "Pilot testing of SHRP 2 reliability data and analytical products: Florida." The accompanying report can be accessed at the following URL: https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/3609 There are 12 datasets in this zip file, including 2 Microsoft Excel worksheets (XLSX) and 10 Comma Separated Values (CSV) files. The Microsoft Excel worksheets can be opened using the 2010 and 2016 versions of Microsoft Word, the CSV files can be opened using most text editors.

The EIA-906, EIA-920, EIA-923 and predecessor forms provide monthly and annual data on generation and fuel consumption at the power plant and prime mover level. A subset of plants, steam-electric plants 10 MW and above, also provides boiler level and generator level data. Data for utility plants are available from 1970, and for non-utility plants from 1999. Beginning with January 2004 data collection, the EIA-920 was used to collect data from the combined heat and power plant (cogeneration) segment of the non-utility sector; also as of 2004, nonutilities filed the annual data for nonutility source and disposition of electricity. Beginning in 2007, environmental data was collected on Schedules 8A – 8F of the Form 923 and includes by-product disposition, financial information, NOX control operations, cooling system operations and FGP and FGD unit operations. Beginning in 2008, the EIA-923 superseded the EIA-906, EIA-920, FERC 423, and the EIA-423. Schedule 2 of the EIA-923 collects the plant level fuel receipts and cost data previously collected on the FERC and EIA Forms 423. Data for fuel receipts and costs prior to 2010 are published at /cneaf/electricity/page/eia423.html.

Power plant data prior to 2001 are published as database (.DBF) files, with separate files for utility and non-utility plants. For 2001 data and subsequent years, the data are in Excel spreadsheet files that include data for all plants and make other changes to the presentation of the data.

Note that beginning with January 2001, the data for combined heat and power plants (i.e., the plants that provide data on the EIA-920 form) will only be posted in the combined Excel file.

The links will allow you to download the current Excel files, and will take you to the locations from which you can download the DBF-format utility and non-utility files for 2000 and earlier. The "Database Notes from EIA" link will take you to information on changes to the data and other points of interest to users.

Historical database (.dbf) files for utility (1970-2000) and non-utility (1999-2000)

Utility Database	Legacy (.DBF) Format
Non-Utility Database	Legacy (.DBF) Format
Database Notes from EIA	Updated 4/21/10
Comments or Questions?	E-Mail EIA-923@eia.doe.gov

Additional Links:
Monthly Generation and Fuel Consumption by State
Electric Power Monthly
Form EIA-923, Power Plant Operations Report, form and instructions, (http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/images/pdf.gif" alt="pdf file" height="16" width="16">) pdf format
Form EIA-923, Power Plant Operations Report, form and instructions, MS Word format

    <b>Contact:</b> <span class="bodypara"><div align="left"> Channele Wirman<br> Phone: 202-586-5356<br> Email: <a href="mailto:channele.wirman@eia.doe.gov">Channele Wirman</a></div></span>

Spatial analysis and statistical summaries of the Protected Areas Database of the United States (PAD-US) provide land managers and decision makers with a general assessment of management intent for biodiversity protection, natural resource management, and recreation access across the nation. The PAD-US 3.0 Combined Fee, Designation, Easement feature class (with Military Lands and Tribal Areas from the Proclamation and Other Planning Boundaries feature class) was modified to remove overlaps, avoiding overestimation in protected area statistics and to support user needs. A Python scripted process ("PADUS3_0_CreateVectorAnalysisFileScript.zip") associated with this data release prioritized overlapping designations (e.g. Wilderness within a National Forest) based upon their relative biodiversity conservation status (e.g. GAP Status Code 1 over 2), public access values (in the order of Closed, Restricted, Open, Unknown), and geodatabase load order (records are deliberately organized in the PAD-US full inventory with fee owned lands loaded before overlapping management designations, and easements). The Vector Analysis File ("PADUS3_0VectorAnalysisFile_ClipCensus.zip") associated item of PAD-US 3.0 Spatial Analysis and Statistics ( https://doi.org/10.5066/P9KLBB5D ) was clipped to the Census state boundary file to define the extent and serve as a common denominator for statistical summaries. Boundaries of interest to stakeholders (State, Department of the Interior Region, Congressional District, County, EcoRegions I-IV, Urban Areas, Landscape Conservation Cooperative) were incorporated into separate geodatabase feature classes to support various data summaries ("PADUS3_0VectorAnalysisFileOtherExtents_Clip_Census.zip") and Comma-separated Value (CSV) tables ("PADUS3_0SummaryStatistics_TabularData_CSV.zip") summarizing "PADUS3_0VectorAnalysisFileOtherExtents_Clip_Census.zip" are provided as an alternative format and enable users to explore and download summary statistics of interest (Comma-separated Table [CSV], Microsoft Excel Workbook [.XLSX], Portable Document Format [.PDF] Report) from the PAD-US Lands and Inland Water Statistics Dashboard ( https://www.usgs.gov/programs/gap-analysis-project/science/pad-us-statistics ). In addition, a "flattened" version of the PAD-US 3.0 combined file without other extent boundaries ("PADUS3_0VectorAnalysisFile_ClipCensus.zip") allow for other applications that require a representation of overall protection status without overlapping designation boundaries. The "PADUS3_0VectorAnalysis_State_Clip_CENSUS2020" feature class ("PADUS3_0VectorAnalysisFileOtherExtents_Clip_Census.gdb") is the source of the PAD-US 3.0 raster files (associated item of PAD-US 3.0 Spatial Analysis and Statistics, https://doi.org/10.5066/P9KLBB5D ). Note, the PAD-US inventory is now considered functionally complete with the vast majority of land protection types represented in some manner, while work continues to maintain updates and improve data quality (see inventory completeness estimates at: http://www.protectedlands.net/data-stewards/ ). In addition, changes in protected area status between versions of the PAD-US may be attributed to improving the completeness and accuracy of the spatial data more than actual management actions or new acquisitions. USGS provides no legal warranty for the use of this data. While PAD-US is the official aggregation of protected areas ( https://www.fgdc.gov/ngda-reports/NGDA_Datasets.html ), agencies are the best source of their lands data.

Missense mutations can have diverse effects on proteins, depending on their location within the protein and the specific amino acid substitution. Mutations in the DNA mismatch repair gene MLH1 are associated with Lynch syndrome, yet the underlying mechanism of most disease-causing mutations remains elusive. To address this gap, we aim to disentangle the mutational effects on two essential properties for MLH1 function: protein stability and protein-protein interaction. We systematically examine the cellular abundance and interaction with PMS2 of 4839 (94%) MLH1 variants in the C-terminal domain. Our combined data shows that most MLH1 variants lose interaction with PMS2 due to reduced cellular abundance. However, substitutions to charged residues in the canonical interface lead to reduced interaction with PMS2. Unexpectedly, we also identify a distal region in the C-terminal domain of MLH1 where substitutions cause both decreased and increased binding with PMS2, and propose a region in PMS2 as the binding site. Our data correlate with clinical classifications of benign and pathogenic MLH1 variants and align with thermodynamic stability predictions and evolutionary conservation. This work provides mechanistic insights into variant consequences and may help interpret MLH1 variants.

Abstract

The documentation covers Enterprise Survey panel datasets that were collected in Slovenia in 2009, 2013 and 2019.

The Slovenia ES 2009 was conducted between 2008 and 2009. The Slovenia ES 2013 was conducted between March 2013 and September 2013. Finally, the Slovenia ES 2019 was conducted between December 2018 and November 2019. The objective of the Enterprise Survey is to gain an understanding of what firms experience in the private sector.

As part of its strategic goal of building a climate for investment, job creation, and sustainable growth, the World Bank has promoted improving the business environment as a key strategy for development, which has led to a systematic effort in collecting enterprise data across countries. The Enterprise Surveys (ES) are an ongoing World Bank project in collecting both objective data based on firms' experiences and enterprises' perception of the environment in which they operate.

Geographic coverage

National

Analysis unit

The primary sampling unit of the study is the establishment. An establishment is a physical location where business is carried out and where industrial operations take place or services are provided. A firm may be composed of one or more establishments. For example, a brewery may have several bottling plants and several establishments for distribution. For the purposes of this survey an establishment must take its own financial decisions and have its own financial statements separate from those of the firm. An establishment must also have its own management and control over its payroll.

Universe

As it is standard for the ES, the Slovenia ES was based on the following size stratification: small (5 to 19 employees), medium (20 to 99 employees), and large (100 or more employees).

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

The sample for Slovenia ES 2009, 2013, 2019 were selected using stratified random sampling, following the methodology explained in the Sampling Manual for Slovenia 2009 ES and for Slovenia 2013 ES, and in the Sampling Note for 2019 Slovenia ES.

Three levels of stratification were used in this country: industry, establishment size, and oblast (region). The original sample designs with specific information of the industries and regions chosen are included in the attached Excel file (Sampling Report.xls.) for Slovenia 2009 ES. For Slovenia 2013 and 2019 ES, specific information of the industries and regions chosen is described in the "The Slovenia 2013 Enterprise Surveys Data Set" and "The Slovenia 2019 Enterprise Surveys Data Set" reports respectively, Appendix E.

For the Slovenia 2009 ES, industry stratification was designed in the way that follows: the universe was stratified into manufacturing industries, services industries, and one residual (core) sector as defined in the sampling manual. Each industry had a target of 90 interviews. For the manufacturing industries sample sizes were inflated by about 17% to account for potential non-response cases when requesting sensitive financial data and also because of likely attrition in future surveys that would affect the construction of a panel. For the other industries (residuals) sample sizes were inflated by about 12% to account for under sampling in firms in service industries.

For Slovenia 2013 ES, industry stratification was designed in the way that follows: the universe was stratified into one manufacturing industry, and two service industries (retail, and other services).

Finally, for Slovenia 2019 ES, three levels of stratification were used in this country: industry, establishment size, and region. The original sample design with specific information of the industries and regions chosen is described in "The Slovenia 2019 Enterprise Surveys Data Set" report, Appendix C. Industry stratification was done as follows: Manufacturing – combining all the relevant activities (ISIC Rev. 4.0 codes 10-33), Retail (ISIC 47), and Other Services (ISIC 41-43, 45, 46, 49-53, 55, 56, 58, 61, 62, 79, 95).

For Slovenia 2009 and 2013 ES, size stratification was defined following the standardized definition for the rollout: small (5 to 19 employees), medium (20 to 99 employees), and large (more than 99 employees). For stratification purposes, the number of employees was defined on the basis of reported permanent full-time workers. This seems to be an appropriate definition of the labor force since seasonal/casual/part-time employment is not a common practice, except in the sectors of construction and agriculture.

For Slovenia 2009 ES, regional stratification was defined in 2 regions. These regions are Vzhodna Slovenija and Zahodna Slovenija. The Slovenia sample contains panel data. The wave 1 panel “Investment Climate Private Enterprise Survey implemented in Slovenia” consisted of 223 establishments interviewed in 2005. A total of 57 establishments have been re-interviewed in the 2008 Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey.

For Slovenia 2013 ES, regional stratification was defined in 2 regions (city and the surrounding business area) throughout Slovenia.

Finally, for Slovenia 2019 ES, regional stratification was done across two regions: Eastern Slovenia (NUTS code SI03) and Western Slovenia (SI04).

Mode of data collection

Computer Assisted Personal Interview [capi]

Research instrument

Questionnaires have common questions (core module) and respectfully additional manufacturing- and services-specific questions. The eligible manufacturing industries have been surveyed using the Manufacturing questionnaire (includes the core module, plus manufacturing specific questions). Retail firms have been interviewed using the Services questionnaire (includes the core module plus retail specific questions) and the residual eligible services have been covered using the Services questionnaire (includes the core module). Each variation of the questionnaire is identified by the index variable, a0.

Response rate

Survey non-response must be differentiated from item non-response. The former refers to refusals to participate in the survey altogether whereas the latter refers to the refusals to answer some specific questions. Enterprise Surveys suffer from both problems and different strategies were used to address these issues.

Item non-response was addressed by two strategies: a- For sensitive questions that may generate negative reactions from the respondent, such as corruption or tax evasion, enumerators were instructed to collect the refusal to respond as (-8). b- Establishments with incomplete information were re-contacted in order to complete this information, whenever necessary. However, there were clear cases of low response.

For 2009 and 2013 Slovenia ES, the survey non-response was addressed by maximizing efforts to contact establishments that were initially selected for interview. Up to 4 attempts were made to contact the establishment for interview at different times/days of the week before a replacement establishment (with similar strata characteristics) was suggested for interview. Survey non-response did occur but substitutions were made in order to potentially achieve strata-specific goals. Further research is needed on survey non-response in the Enterprise Surveys regarding potential introduction of bias.

For 2009, the number of contacted establishments per realized interview was 6.18. This number is the result of two factors: explicit refusals to participate in the survey, as reflected by the rate of rejection (which includes rejections of the screener and the main survey) and the quality of the sample frame, as represented by the presence of ineligible units. The relatively low ratio of contacted establishments per realized interview (6.18) suggests that the main source of error in estimates in the Slovenia may be selection bias and not frame inaccuracy.

For 2013, the number of realized interviews per contacted establishment was 25%. This number is the result of two factors: explicit refusals to participate in the survey, as reflected by the rate of rejection (which includes rejections of the screener and the main survey) and the quality of the sample frame, as represented by the presence of ineligible units. The number of rejections per contact was 44%.

Finally, for 2019, the number of interviews per contacted establishments was 9.7%. This number is the result of two factors: explicit refusals to participate in the survey, as reflected by the rate of rejection (which includes rejections of the screener and the main survey) and the quality of the sample frame, as represented by the presence of ineligible units. The share of rejections per contact was 75.2%.

Once PowerPivot has been installed, to load the large files, please follow the instructions below: Start Excel as normal Click on the PowerPivot tab Click on the PowerPivot Window icon (top left) In the PowerPivot Window, click on the "From Other Sources" icon In the Table Import Wizard e.g. scroll to the bottom and select Text File Browse to the file you want to open and choose the file extension you require e.g. CSV Please read the below notes to ensure correct understanding of the data. Microsoft PowerPivot add-on for Excel can be used to handle larger data sets. The Microsoft PowerPivot add-on for Excel is available using the link in the 'Related Links' section - https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=43348 Once PowerPivot has been installed, to load the large files, please follow the instructions below: 1. Start Excel as normal 2. Click on the PowerPivot tab 3. Click on the PowerPivot Window icon (top left) 4. In the PowerPivot Window, click on the "From Other Sources" icon 5. In the Table Import Wizard e.g. scroll to the bottom and select Text File 6. Browse to the file you want to open and choose the file extension you require e.g. CSV Please read the below notes to ensure correct understanding of the data. Fewer than 5 Items Please be aware that I have decided not to release the exact number of items, where the total number of items falls below 5, for certain drugs/patient combinations. Where suppression has been applied a * is shown in place of the number of items, please read this as 1-4 items. Suppressions have been applied where items are lower than 5, for items and NIC and for quantity when quantity and items are both lower than 5 for the following drugs and identified genders as per the sensitive drug list; When the BNF Paragraph Code is 60401 (Female Sex Hormones & Their Modulators) and the gender identified on the prescription is Male When the BNF Paragraph Code is 60402 (Male Sex Hormones And Antagonists) and the gender identified on the prescription is Female When the BNF Paragraph Code is 70201 (Preparations For Vaginal/Vulval Changes) and the gender identified on the prescription is Male When the BNF Paragraph Code is 70202 (Vaginal And Vulval Infections) and the gender identified on the prescription is Male When the BNF Paragraph Code is 70301 (Combined Hormonal Contraceptives/Systems) and the gender identified on the prescription is Male When the BNF Paragraph Code is 70302 (Progestogen-only Contraceptives) and the gender identified on the prescription is Male When the BNF Paragraph Code is 80302 (Progestogens) and the gender identified on the prescription is Male When the BNF Paragraph Code is 70405 (Drugs For Erectile Dysfunction) and the gender identified on the prescription is Female When the BNF Paragraph Code is 70406 (Drugs For Premature Ejaculation) and the gender identified on the prescription is Female This is because the patients could be identified, when combined with other information that may be in the public domain or reasonably available. This information falls under the exemption in section 40 subsections 2 and 3A (a) of the Freedom of Information Act. This is because it would breach the first data protection principle as: a. it is not fair to disclose patients personal details to the world and is likely to cause damage or distress. b. these details are not of sufficient interest to the public to warrant an intrusion into the privacy of the patients. Please click the below web link to see the exemption in full.

Characteristics of the included studies on knowledge and attitudes toward mpox.