The Community Development Block Grant Program provides grants and technical assistance to develop livable urban communities for persons of low and moderate incomes by expanding economic opportunities and providing housing and suitable living environments. This report covers Fiscal Years 2019-2025. For more information visit https://www.oregon.gov/biz/programs/CDBG/Pages/default.aspx

Through the Community Development Public Service Programs, MOHCD funds a wide range of social services, with two primary objectives: 1) Families and individuals are resilient and economically self-sufficient, and 2) Families and individuals are stably housed. These objectives are met through specific funding strategies developed in our ten program areas. This data reports MOHCD’s efforts toward accomplishing those two objectives across each program area. Data reflects activities funded for Fiscal Year 2018-2019 as of June 30, 2019.

Content

This data details community development projects funded by the Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development (MOHCD) by funded agency, program area, and funding source for Fiscal Year 2018-2019 as of June 30, 2019.

Context

This is a dataset hosted by the city of San Francisco. The organization has an open data platform found here and they update their information according the amount of data that is brought in. Explore San Francisco's Data using Kaggle and all of the data sources available through the San Francisco organization page!

• Update Frequency: This dataset is updated quarterly.

Acknowledgements

This dataset is maintained using Socrata's API and Kaggle's API. Socrata has assisted countless organizations with hosting their open data and has been an integral part of the process of bringing more data to the public.

Cover photo by Breno Assis on Unsplash
Unsplash Images are distributed under a unique Unsplash License.

These profiles significantly increase the amount of information that is available about the performance of CDBG grantees. It is important that our grantees, all our stakeholders, and citizens be able to access detailed information about the performance of each local CDBG program. This access helps ensure accountability and assists in assessing the progress of each grantee's program. These profiles also assist grantees in measuring their contributions toward meeting the housing and community developments needs of low- and moderate-income persons in their communities and in analyzing the effectiveness and efficiency of their program.

Summary of all Housing & Community Development (HCD) program activities compiled from individual program tracking excel-based sheets that includes fund utilization and persons served associated by fund year, expenditure dates, activity, agency, type of services, city council priorities that it supports and if program crosses multiple fiscal years. Also included are links to source documentation that are not tied to any visualizations.

Listing of open and closed CDBG contracts between NYS Homes & Community Renewal’s Office of Community Renewal and grant recipients. Details include contract number, project name, project type, activity, contract amount, grant recipient, county, municipality and contract status, for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program.

The report contains thirteen (13) performance metrics for City's workforce development programs. Each metric can be breakdown by three demographic types (gender, race/ethnicity, and age group) and the program target population (e.g., youth and young adults, NYCHA communities) as well. This report is a key output of an integrated data system that collects, integrates, and generates disaggregated data by Mayor's Office for Economic Opportunity (NYC Opportunity). Currently, the report is generated by the integrated database incorporating data from 18 workforce development programs managed by 5 City agencies. There has been no single "workforce development system" in the City of New York. Instead, many discrete public agencies directly manage or fund local partners to deliver a range of different services, sometimes tailored to specific populations. As a result, program data have historically been fragmented as well, making it challenging to develop insights based on a comprehensive picture. To overcome it, NYC Opportunity collects data from 5 City agencies and builds the integrated database, and it begins to build a complete picture of how participants move through the system onto a career pathway. Each row represents a count of unique individuals for a specific performance metric, program target population, a specific demographic group, and a specific period. For example, if the Metric Value is 2000 with Clients Served (Metric Name), NYCHA Communities (Program Target Population), Asian (Subgroup), and 2019 (Period), you can say that "In 2019, 2,000 Asian individuals participated programs targeting NYCHA communities. Please refer to the Workforce Data Portal for further data guidance (https://workforcedata.nyc.gov/en/data-guidance), and interactive visualizations for this report (https://workforcedata.nyc.gov/en/common-metrics).

The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) is a federal block grant distributed (via formula) to states and local governments. Recipients use the grant funds to carry out housing, economic development, and public improvement efforts that serve low, and moderate-income communities. This dataset provides point location, and relevant information of CDBG activities that have taken place since 1996, and which HUD classifies using one of the following categories:Asset Acquisition - activity related to acquisition, including disposition, clearance and demolition, and clean-up of contaminated Sites/brownfields.Economic Development - activity related to economic development, including commercial or industrial rehab, commercial or industrial land acquisition, commercial or industrial construction, commercial or industrial infrastructure development, direct assistance to businesses, and micro-enterprise assistance.Housing - activity related to housing, including multifamily rehab, housing services, code enforcement, operation and repair of foreclosed property and public housing modernization.Public Improvements - activity related to public improvements, including senior centers, youth centers, parks, street improvements, water/sewer improvements, child care centers, fire stations, health centers, non-residential historic preservation, etc.Public Services - activity related to public services, including senior services, legal services, youth services, employment training, health services, homebuyer counseling, food banks, etc.Other - activity related to urban renewal completion, non-profit organization capacity building, and assistance to institutions of higher education.Location data for HUD-related properties and facilities are derived from HUD's enterprise geocoding service. Note that these data only include latitude and longitude coordinates and associated attributes for those addresses that can be geocoded to an interpolated point along a street segment, or to a ZIP+4 centroid location. While not all records are able to be geocoded and mapped, we are continuously working to improve the address data quality and enhance coverage. Please consider this issue when using any datasets provided by HUD.To learn more about the CDBG Program visit: https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/comm_planning/communitydevelopment/programs, for questions about the spatial attribution of this dataset, please reach out to us at GISHelpdesk@hud.gov. Data Dictionary: DD_CDBG Program ActivityDate of Coverage: Up to 11/2023 Last Updated: 11/2023

Abstract

IFAD's Coastal Community Development Project (CCDP) in Indonesia, a US$43.2 million project, had the overall goal of reducing poverty through enhanced, sustainable and replicable economic growth among the active poor in coastal and small island communities. This was to be achieved through investments in fishery, aquaculture, processing and marketing, in addition to provision of related support structures. To this end, the project aimed at addressing constraints on small-scale fishery communities by increasing fish catch, fish productivity and income through improvements in fishing gears (technology) used and fishing practices as well as increasing household participation in high-potential marine and aquaculture value chains. CCDP also aimed at rehabilitating coastal and natural resources to ensure sustainability of the environment, fish stock and economic livelihoods. The project was implemented in 181 villages within 12 districts throughout eastern Indonesia.

The CCDP was selected for rigorous ex-post impact assessment (IA) to analyze the effects of CCDP on a number of impact and outcome indicators, including economic mobility, food security and nutrition, resilience, women's empowerment and natural resources rehabilitation. For more information, please, click on the following link https://www.ifad.org/en/web/knowledge/-/publication/impact-assessment-the-coastal-community-development-ccdp-.

Geographic coverage

The project was implemented in 181 villages within 12 districts throughout eastern Indonesia.

Analysis unit

Households

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

The households that directly participated in the CCDP were termed beneficiaries or the "treatment" group, while households residing in the same villages as CCDP beneficiaries but did not directly participate in the CCDP were termed "spillover" group, as they were likely to indirectly benefit from some of the CCDP interventions, in one way or another. A separate "control" or comparison group of households was drawn from separate districts and villages, which had similar characteristics at baseline as those where CCDP was implemented. More detail on the sampling procedure is available in the IA plan and report attached in the documentation section.

Mode of data collection

Computer Assisted Personal Interview [capi]

Research instrument

A detailed household survey questionnaire was developed to collect primary data on the livelihood activities of the CCDP beneficiaries as well as the spillover and comparison group households. The questionnaire primarily captured data on fisheries and aquaculture activities of the households, characteristics of their fishing gears, fishing boats and technologies used by the fishers as well as the kinds of fish and quantities caught during the peak and low seasons. For aquaculture fishers, the questionnaire collected data on the aquaculture infrastructure used such as cages, rafts and nets, in addition to the types of inputs used such as fingerlings and fish feed. Data on labor use and how fishers organized their fishing/aquaculture activities, including whether they fished in groups or not and whether they sold their fish catch in groups or as individuals and where they sold their fish (whether fresh or after processing), etc. were all captured by the questionnaire.

Additional variables captured by the questionnaire include household-level variables such as income sources (including non-fishing activities), diet composition and food insecurity experiences. Variables on household assets, including productive assets (fishing assets, farming assets, etc.), housing assets, durable assets, savings, and access to credit were also collected through the questionnaire. As is standard with most household surveys, the questionnaire captured household demographic variables, including the ages, sex, education levels, ethnicity and religion of the individuals in the households interviewed. Variables designed to measure resilience to a variety of shocks as well as measure women's empowerment were also captured through the household survey questionnaire. In addition to the household survey questionnaire, a community-level survey questionnaire was designed and used to collect data on a number of community-level variables. This questionnaire captured variables such as the types of infrastructure and public services available in the communities, the various development projects implemented in the community, as well as variables on shocks that the communities experienced and the development and social groups operating in the communities. The community-level survey questionnaire allowed for the collection of important community-level variables useful for matching as well as for controlling for as part of data analysis.

Note: some variables may have missing labels. Please, refer to the questionnaire for more details.

This data details community development projects funded by the Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development (MOHCD) by funded agency, program area, and funding source.

This pdf gives a summary of the CDFI (Community Development Financial Institutions) program and the NACA (Native American CDFI Assistance) Program datasets and the data trends for FY (fiscal year)2018.

Description Community Development Corporations (CDCs) are nonprofit, community-focused entities whose mission is to support their affiliated city neighborhoods with a range of programs such as affordable housing, economic development, safety, and social services.

This layer consists of the CDC service boundaries as of 2021 for CDCs that are funded by the City of Cleveland's Department of Community Development.

Since that time, Cudell CDC and DSCDO have dissolved, and a new CDC (Northwest Neighborhoods) was created. The Northwest Neighborhoods boundary is not contained within this feature layer, but can be accessed 
here. 
The DSCDO and Cudell boundaries are still needed by Community Development staff, as those designations are still cited in some contracts until they expire. For an accurate identification of the dominant CDC in an area, visit the CDC Identifier application 
here.

This dataset is featured on the following app(s):Community Development Corporation (CDC) Identifier App

CDCs included in this feature layer:

 Bellaire-Puritas Development CorporationMidtown Cleveland, Inc.
 Burten, Bell, Carr Development CorporationMt. Pleasant NOW Development Corp.
 Cudell Improvements, Inc.Metro West Community Development Organization
 Detroit Shoreway Community Dev. Org.Ohio City, Inc.
 Fairfax Renaissance Dev. Corp.Old Brooklyn Community Dev. Corp.
 Famicos FoundationSlavic Village Development
 Greater CollinwoodTremont West Development Corp.
 Harvard Community Service CenterUnion-Miles Development Corp.
 West Park Kamm's Neighborhood Development Corp.Westown Community Development Corp.

Data GlossarySee the Attributes section below for details about each column in this dataset.

Update Frequency When the status of CDCs change.

Contacts Department of Community Development | (216) 664-4000

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requires local municipalities that receive Community Development Block Grant (CDBG or CD) formula Entitlement funds to use the 5-year 2016-2020 American Community Survey (ACS) Low and Moderate Income Summary Data (LMISD) data file to determine where CDBG funds may be used for activities that are available to all the residents in a particular area ("CD area benefit" or "CD-eligible area"). A CD-eligible census tract refers to 2020 census tracts where the area is primarily residential in nature and at least 51.00% of the residents are low- and moderate-income persons as per the LMISD data file. For New York City, a primarily residential area is defined as one where at least 50.00% of the total built floor area is residential. Low- and moderate-income persons are defined as persons living in households with incomes below 80 percent of the area median household income (AMI). In addition, floor area percentages have been updated with the most recent floor area data (PLUTO 24v4). Persons who are interested in determining their individual household eligibility for CD-funded programs should refer to HUD's household low- and moderate-income limits for the given year. For more information about how geographic datasets are used for compliance purposes, please refer to the following HUD Office of Community Planning and Development (CPD) Notice CPD-24-04.

Community Development Block Grant Program funds help strengthen Maryland’s communities by expanding affordable housing opportunities, creating jobs, stabilizing neighborhoods and improving overall quality of life.​

Congress created the Community Development Block Grant Program under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974. The primary objective is to develop viable communities, provide decent housing and a suitable living environment, and to expand economic opportunities, principally for persons of low and moderate income. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) oversees the Program.

The Program is comprised of two parts. The Entitlement Program is directly administered by HUD and provides Federal funds to large metropolitan entitlement communities. The States and Small Cities Program provides Federal funds to the States and Puerto Rico (with the exception of Hawaii) who then distribute funds to non-entitlement counties, small cities and towns. Congress​ allocates funds to the program annually. The Entitlement Program receives approximately 70% of the allocation and the remaining 30% is distributed to the States and Small Cities Program.

Maryland's Community Development Block Grant Program is administered by the Maryland Department of Housing and Community Development. The State receives an allocation from the Department of Housing and Urban Development each July.

DISCLAIMER: Some of the information may be tied to the Department’s bond funded loan programs and should not be relied upon in making an investment decision. The Department provides comprehensive quarterly and annual financial information and operating data regarding its bonds and bond funded loan programs, all of which is posted on the publicly-accessible Electronic Municipal Market Access system website (commonly known as EMMA) that is maintained by the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board, and on the Department’s website under Investor Information.

More information accessible here: http://dhcd.maryland.gov/Investors/Pages/default.aspx

Community Development And Empowerment Initiative Program Export Import Data. Follow the Eximpedia platform for HS code, importer-exporter records, and customs shipment details.

Established in 1974, the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program provides annual grant funding to local and

state governments to address a wide range of unique community development needs.

HUD determines the amount of each grant by using a formula comprised of several measures of community need, including

the extent of poverty, population, housing density, age of housing, and population growth relative to other metropolitan

areas.

The annual CDBG appropriation is allocated among states and local jurisdictions categorized as "entitlement" and

"non-entitlement" communities respectively. Entitlement communities are comprised of the principal cities of Metropolitan Statistical

Areas (MSAs); metropolitan cities with populations of at least 50,000; and qualified urban counties with a population of 200,000 or

more (excluding the populations of entitlement cities). Non-entitlement communities receive CDBG funding from their respective states

in accordance with requirements that state.

To learn more about the CDBG program visit: https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/comm_planning/communitydevelopment/programs

Data Dictionary: DD_CDBG Grantee Areas

Date of Coverage: 2020

Data Updated: Annually

The Western Alaska Community Development Quota (CDQ) Program allocates a percentage of all Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands quotas for groundfish, prohibited species, halibut, and crab to eligible communities. The purpose of the CDQ Program is to provide the means for starting or supporting commercial fisheries business activities that will result in an ongoing, regionally based, fisheries-relat...

Get data on announced projects funded through the Rural Economic Development (RED) program.

Ontario's RED program funds projects that stimulate economic growth in rural and Indigenous communities.

The data includes:

• name of the organization that requested funding
• county or district where the organization is located
• project name
• date that funding was approved
• amount of funding provided

From 2013 to 2016, the RED program funded projects led by businesses or communities.

Starting in 2017, the RED program only focuses on projects led by:

• not-for-profit organizations
• municipalities
• local service boards
• Indigenous communities and organizations

Learn more about the Rural Economic Development program.

The Community Development Process Survey is an evaluation tool showing the City Council and the community our customer satisfaction levels during the course of processing an application. By collecting the survey responses, we can identify areas of satisfaction as well as steps for improvement. This dataset comes from collecting survey responses at each key step in the planning entitlement, plan review, permitting, and inspection processes. The performance measure page is available at 4.20 Community Development Process Satisfaction. Additional Information Source: SurveyMonkeyContact (author): Jacob Payne Contact E-Mail (author): jacob_payne@tempe.gov Contact (maintainer): Contact E-Mail (maintainer): Data Source Type: Excel Preparation Method: Survey Monkey Publish Frequency: Annual Publish Method: Manual Data Dictionary

The City Planning Facilities Database (FacDB) aggregates information about 35,000+ public and private facilities and program sites that are owned, operated, funded, licensed or certified by a City, State, or Federal agency in the City of New York. It captures facilities that generally help to shape quality of life in the city’s neighborhoods, including schools, day cares, parks, libraries, public safety services, youth programs, community centers, health clinics, workforce development programs, transitional housing, and solid waste and transportation infrastructure sites. To facilitate analysis and mapping, the data is available in coma-separated values (CSV) file format, ESRI Shapefile, and GeoJSon. The data is also complemented with a new interactive web map that enables users to easily filter the data for their needs. Users are strongly encouraged to read the database documentation, particularly with regard to analytical limitations.

For data dictionary, please follow this link