Collaboratory is a software product developed and maintained by HandsOn Connect Cloud Solutions. It is intended to help higher education institutions accurately and comprehensively track their relationships with the community through engagement and service activities. Institutions that use Collaboratory are given the option to opt-in to a data sharing initiative at the time of onboarding, which grants us permission to de-identify their data and make it publicly available for research purposes. HandsOn Connect is committed to making Collaboratory data accessible to scholars for research, toward the goal of advancing the field of community engagement and social impact.Collaboratory is not a survey, but is instead a dynamic software tool designed to facilitate comprehensive, longitudinal data collection on community engagement and public service activities conducted by faculty, staff, and students in higher education. We provide a standard questionnaire that was developed by Collaboratory’s co-founders (Janke, Medlin, and Holland) in the Institute for Community and Economic Engagement at UNC Greensboro, which continues to be closely monitored and adapted by staff at HandsOn Connect and academic colleagues. It includes descriptive characteristics (what, where, when, with whom, to what end) of activities and invites participants to periodically update their information in accordance with activity progress over time. Examples of individual questions include the focus areas addressed, populations served, on- and off-campus collaborators, connections to teaching and research, and location information, among others.The Collaboratory dataset contains data from 45 institutions beginning in March 2016 and continues to grow as more institutions adopt Collaboratory and continue to expand its use. The data represent over 6,200 published activities (and additional associated content) across our user base.Please cite this data as:Medlin, Kristin and Singh, Manmeet. Dataset on Higher Education Community Engagement and Public Service Activities, 2016-2023. Collaboratory [producer], 2021. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2023-07-07. https://doi.org/10.3886/E136322V1When you cite this data, please also include: Janke, E., Medlin, K., & Holland, B. (2021, November 9). To What End? Ten Years of Collaboratory. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/a27nb

Among the large companies that tend to participate in open source communities, Red Hat ranks the highest worldwide, with ** percent of respondents indicating it as a excellent company in terms of contributions, collaboration and leadership on open source projects and initiatives within the global open source ecosystem in 2021. Google, IBM, and Microsoft also achieve high rankings for their open source community engagement.

Analysis of data from the Community Life Survey looking at how 16- to 24-year-olds engage with their local area, compared with adults aged 25 and over. The data covers England only.

Supplementary data for "Alison Rentschler, Kathleen C. Williams, Community engagement and the importance of partnerships within the Great Lakes Areas of Concern program: A mixed-methods case study, Journal of Great Lakes Research, Volume 48, Issue 6, 2022, Pages 1473-1484, ISSN 0380-1330, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2022.08.005.". This dataset is not publicly accessible because: The supplementary data is covered by an IRB with the University of Michigan. It can be accessed through the following means: The supplementary data is available for download through the journal article published online. Format: A file with Figures and Tables is available for download as a docx. file through the journal article published online. This dataset is associated with the following publication: Rentschler, A., and K. Williams. Community engagement and the importance of partnerships within the Great Lakes Areas of Concern program: A mixed-methods case study. JOURNAL OF GREAT LAKES RESEARCH. International Association for Great Lakes Research, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, N/A, (2022).

This survey, conducted from 12 to 18 February 2020, focusses on citizens’ engagement with Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) as well as their experiences with local public consultations.

Across the EU, 47% of respondents engage with CSOs in some way, mostly by donating money (27%). For those respondents engaged with a CSO, more than one third say it deals with European issues or institutions.

Opinions are quite divided on how well CSOs inform about issues that matter to respondents. 49% of respondents say they feel informed and 46% say that they do not feel informed (46%) about the CSO’s activities. There is greater agreement, however, about the topics that should be priorities for CSOs. A majority of respondents think that CSOs should primarily deal with public health (57%), food safety (57%) and the environment (53%).

The most powerful motivators to increase engagement with CSOs are ‘being convinced that the engagement will have a real impact’ (33%), and ‘knowing how financial engagement will be used by the CSOs’ (25%). In each country, one of these two factors is mostly mentioned.

Although fewer than half of respondents are actively engaged with CSOs, the CSO communication campaigns seem to have a broader impact. Having seen such a campaign organised by CSOs, a majority of respondents ‘took concrete actions’ (55%) and ‘discussed the campaign topic with other people’ (54%).

Finally, 45% of respondents said that in the last 12 months a public consultation took place in their city or village, but only 16% participated in it. For a large majority (72%) of respondents living in an area where such consultations have been held, public consultations are considered useful activities.

Financial overview and grant giving statistics of About Family and Community Engagement

This dataset is comprised of survey responses from EPA staff regarding environmental cleanup activities. The survey asked participants about strategies EPA cleanup personnel use to get to know communities, build trust, and build stakeholder relationships. It also contains questions related to the respondent’s employment status and history with the EPA, their current role in environmental cleanup, and the type of cleanup, cleanup site, and contaminants with which they most commonly work.

UK armed forces veterans and community engagement by personal and service-related characteristics, weighted estimates, Veterans' Survey 2022, UK.

Community Engagement Incidents are interactions the Ferndale Police have with community members that are not responses to calls for service. They are being tracked in order to promote community policing principles and engage citizens in positive interactions with officers.

This dataset represents the total number of individuals educated and engaged through Community Engagement initiatives.

This dataset redacts sensitive information including employee names and comments which may be sensitive.

The Current Population Survey Civic Engagement and Volunteering (CEV) Supplement is the most robust longitudinal survey about volunteerism and other forms of civic engagement in the United States. Produced by AmeriCorps in partnership with the U.S. Census Bureau, the CEV takes the pulse of our nation’s civic health every two years. The data on this page was collected in September 2023. The next wave of the CEV will be administered in September 2025.

The CEV can generate reliable estimates at the national level, within states and the District of Columbia, and in the largest twelve Metropolitan Statistical Areas to support evidence-based decision making and efforts to understand how people make a difference in communities across the country.

Click on "Export" to download and review an excerpt from the 2023 CEV Analytic Codebook that shows the variables available in the analytic CEV datasets produced by AmeriCorps.

Click on "Show More" to download and review the following 2023 CEV data and resources provided as attachments:

1) 2023 CEV Dataset Fact Sheet – brief summary of technical aspects of the 2023 CEV dataset. 2) CEV FAQs – answers to frequently asked technical questions about the CEV 3) Constructs and measures in the CEV 4) 2023 CEV Analytic Data and Setup Files – analytic dataset in Stata (.dta), R (.rdata), SPSS (.sav), and Excel (.csv) formats, codebook for analytic dataset, and Stata code (.do) to convert raw dataset to analytic formatting produced by AmeriCorps. These files were updated on January 16, 2025 to correct erroneous missing values for the ssupwgt variable. 5) 2023 CEV Technical Documentation – codebook for raw dataset and full supplement documentation produced by U.S. Census Bureau 6) 2023 CEV Raw Data and Read In Files – raw dataset in Stata (.dta) format, Stata code (.do) and dictionary file (.dct) to read ASCII dataset (.dat) into Stata using layout files (.lis)

The size of the Community Engagement Platform market was valued at USD 281.7 million in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 505.12 million by 2033, with an expected CAGR of 8.7% during the forecast period.

Financial overview and grant giving statistics of Alliance for Community Engagement

This is the list of titles and abstracts considered in the pen-ultimate stage of the systematic review about effectiveness in community engagement.

Civic engagement activities agencies completed between September 15 and April 30 for the 2020-2022 reports. The latest data is available at https://data.cityofnewyork.us/d/9hhx-gjf8

HNS Community Engagement service areas for team assignments

This statistic illustrates the outcome of the social engagement index in 2018, by country. According to data published by IPSOS, ** percent of respondents from South Africa were ranked as having high social engagement, compared to only ***** percent of respondents from Japan.