Open Government Licence 3.0http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/
License information was derived automatically
Analysis of data from the Community Life Survey looking at how 16- to 24-year-olds engage with their local area, compared with adults aged 25 and over. The data covers England only.
Among the large companies that tend to participate in open source communities, Red Hat ranks the highest worldwide, with ** percent of respondents indicating it as a excellent company in terms of contributions, collaboration and leadership on open source projects and initiatives within the global open source ecosystem in 2021. Google, IBM, and Microsoft also achieve high rankings for their open source community engagement.
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Collaboratory is a software product developed and maintained by HandsOn Connect Cloud Solutions. It is intended to help higher education institutions accurately and comprehensively track their relationships with the community through engagement and service activities. Institutions that use Collaboratory are given the option to opt-in to a data sharing initiative at the time of onboarding, which grants us permission to de-identify their data and make it publicly available for research purposes. HandsOn Connect is committed to making Collaboratory data accessible to scholars for research, toward the goal of advancing the field of community engagement and social impact.Collaboratory is not a survey, but is instead a dynamic software tool designed to facilitate comprehensive, longitudinal data collection on community engagement and public service activities conducted by faculty, staff, and students in higher education. We provide a standard questionnaire that was developed by Collaboratory’s co-founders (Janke, Medlin, and Holland) in the Institute for Community and Economic Engagement at UNC Greensboro, which continues to be closely monitored and adapted by staff at HandsOn Connect and academic colleagues. It includes descriptive characteristics (what, where, when, with whom, to what end) of activities and invites participants to periodically update their information in accordance with activity progress over time. Examples of individual questions include the focus areas addressed, populations served, on- and off-campus collaborators, connections to teaching and research, and location information, among others.The Collaboratory dataset contains data from 45 institutions beginning in March 2016 and continues to grow as more institutions adopt Collaboratory and continue to expand its use. The data represent over 6,200 published activities (and additional associated content) across our user base.Please cite this data as:Medlin, Kristin and Singh, Manmeet. Dataset on Higher Education Community Engagement and Public Service Activities, 2016-2023. Collaboratory [producer], 2021. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2023-07-07. https://doi.org/10.3886/E136322V1When you cite this data, please also include: Janke, E., Medlin, K., & Holland, B. (2021, November 9). To What End? Ten Years of Collaboratory. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/a27nb
Supplementary data for "Alison Rentschler, Kathleen C. Williams, Community engagement and the importance of partnerships within the Great Lakes Areas of Concern program: A mixed-methods case study, Journal of Great Lakes Research, Volume 48, Issue 6, 2022, Pages 1473-1484, ISSN 0380-1330, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2022.08.005.". This dataset is not publicly accessible because: The supplementary data is covered by an IRB with the University of Michigan. It can be accessed through the following means: The supplementary data is available for download through the journal article published online. Format: A file with Figures and Tables is available for download as a docx. file through the journal article published online. This dataset is associated with the following publication: Rentschler, A., and K. Williams. Community engagement and the importance of partnerships within the Great Lakes Areas of Concern program: A mixed-methods case study. JOURNAL OF GREAT LAKES RESEARCH. International Association for Great Lakes Research, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, N/A, (2022).
This dataset represents the total number of individuals educated and engaged through Community Engagement initiatives.
This dataset redacts sensitive information including employee names and comments which may be sensitive.
Financial overview and grant giving statistics of About Family and Community Engagement
The Current Population Survey Civic Engagement and Volunteering (CEV) Supplement is the most robust longitudinal survey about volunteerism and other forms of civic engagement in the United States. Produced by AmeriCorps in partnership with the U.S. Census Bureau, the CEV takes the pulse of our nation’s civic health every two years. The CEV can support evidence-based decision making and efforts to understand how people make a difference in communities across the country. The findings on this page are based on data collected in September of 2017, 2019, 2021, and 2023. All figures are weighted to account for the random selection of eligible respondents and missing data due to nonresponse. They reflect national rates of 17 measures of civic engagement for key demographic subgroups. Please see column descriptions for details. A spreadsheet with all of these figures is provided as an attachment along with additional resources about the CEV data. Click on "Show More" to view and download. To explore CEV findings in an interactive dashboard, please see https://data.americorps.gov/stories/s/AmeriCorps-Civic-Engagement-and-Volunteering-CEV-D/62w6-z7xa For the full CEV datasets, please see https://data.americorps.gov/browse?q=cev&sortBy=last_modified&utf8=%E2%9C%93
https://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policy
The global Community Engagement Platform market is anticipated to grow from a value of USD 281.7 million in 2025 to USD 495.5 million in 2033, exhibiting a CAGR of 8.7% during the forecast period (2025-2033). The rising need for enhanced citizen engagement, streamlined communication, and efficient community management drives market growth. Additionally, government initiatives promoting citizen participation and the increasing adoption of digital platforms further fuel market expansion. The market is segmented into various application areas, including BFSI, government and public utilities, healthcare, retail, manufacturing, education, and media and entertainment. Cloud-based platforms hold a significant market share due to their cost-effectiveness, flexibility, and scalability. Leading companies in the market include Vanilla Forums, Higher Logic, Mobilize, and Bang the Table. North America dominates the market, followed by Europe and Asia Pacific. Key market drivers include the growing demand for citizen engagement, the proliferation of digital communication channels, and the increasing focus on community-led initiatives. However, data privacy concerns and limited technical expertise in certain regions pose challenges to market growth.
This dataset is comprised of survey responses from EPA staff regarding environmental cleanup activities. The survey asked participants about strategies EPA cleanup personnel use to get to know communities, build trust, and build stakeholder relationships. It also contains questions related to the respondent’s employment status and history with the EPA, their current role in environmental cleanup, and the type of cleanup, cleanup site, and contaminants with which they most commonly work.
Open Government Licence 3.0http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/
License information was derived automatically
UK armed forces veterans and community engagement by personal and service-related characteristics, weighted estimates, Veterans' Survey 2022, UK.
Financial overview and grant giving statistics of Community Engagement Partners
https://www.cognitivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.cognitivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policy
According to Cognitive Market Research, the global Community Engagement Platform market size is USD 581.2 million in 2024. It will expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 16.20% from 2024 to 2031.
North America held the major market share for more than 40% of the global revenue with a market size of USD 232.48 million in 2024 and will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 14.2% from 2024 to 2031.
Europe accounted for a market share of over 30% of the global revenue with a market size of USD 174.36 million.
Asia Pacific held a market share of around 23% of the global revenue with a market size of USD 133.68 million in 2024 and will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 18.2% from 2024 to 2031.
Latin America had a market share for more than 5% of the global revenue with a market size of USD 29.06 million in 2024 and will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 15.6% from 2024 to 2031.
Middle East and Africa had a market share of around 2% of the global revenue and was estimated at a market size of USD 11.62 million in 2024 and will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 15.9% from 2024 to 2031.
The Load-based ASRS held the highest Community Engagement Platform market revenue share in 2024.
Market Dynamics of Community Engagement Platform Market
Key Drivers for Community Engagement Platform Market
Increasing Need for Citizen Engagement to Increase the Demand Globally
Governments and businesses now emphasize citizen engagement for inclusive decision-making and agree with constructing. Community engagement structures serve as centralized hubs for verbal exchange, collaboration, and feedback. These systems foster transparency, enabling stakeholders to voice concerns, offer input, and participate in discussions. By leveraging such platforms, governments and organizations benefit from precious insights, improving their responsiveness to community desires and worries. Moreover, fostering open talk cultivates consideration between government and residents, leading to greater knowledge and effective choice-making approaches. As the demand for participatory governance grows, community engagement structures play a pivotal role in facilitating significant interactions and selling democratic standards.
Rise of Social Media to Propel Market Growth
Social media has revolutionized communique, shaping how human beings connect and engage globally. Community engagement systems capitalize on social media tools to domesticate online communities and enhance participation. By integrating functions like forums, live chats, and polls, these systems facilitate dynamic interactions and alternate thoughts amongst diverse stakeholders. Leveraging the massive attain and accessibility of social media systems, community engagement initiatives can amplify their outreach and engagement efforts. Furthermore, social media integration permits actual-time remarks collection and dissemination, fostering inclusive selection-making approaches. As social media continues to conform, its synergy with network engagement systems gives extraordinary possibilities to foster collaboration, empower groups, and force high-quality trade via participatory methods.
Restraint Factor for the Community Engagement Platform Market
High Cost to Limit the Sales
Implementing and maintaining a community engagement platform often affords monetary challenges, especially for smaller groups with constrained assets. The initial setup charges, including software development, infrastructure, and staff education, may be prohibitive—moreover, ongoing prices for preservation, updates, and technical support in addition to pressure budgets. Smaller groups may additionally conflict to allocate budget for such tasks amidst competing priorities. Additionally, there are hidden fees associated with personal engagement, content moderation, and records security measures, exacerbating monetary burdens. As a result, a few businesses might also choose inexpensive options or forego community engagement efforts altogether, missing out on precious possibilities for stakeholder involvement and remarks and addressing the cost barrier calls for progressive financing fashions, collaborative partnerships, and strategic aid allocation to make certain equitable rights of entry to powerful network engagement systems.
Impact of Covid-19 on the Community Engagement Platform Market
The COVID-19 pandemic c...
This is the list of titles and abstracts considered in the pen-ultimate stage of the systematic review about effectiveness in community engagement.
CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
This is the list of titles and abstracts considered in the pen-ultimate stage of the systematic review about effectiveness in community engagement.
Civic engagement activities agencies completed between September 15 and April 30 for the 2020-2022 reports. The latest data is available at https://data.cityofnewyork.us/d/9hhx-gjf8
Financial overview and grant giving statistics of Partners For Campus Community Engagement
Released: 29 July 2021
Geographic Coverage: England
This release provides estimates on a number of measures covering social cohesion, community engagement and social action over the period of April 2020 to March 2021. The survey ran over the course of a year, recording respondents’ answers consistently over the year during different periods of lockdown measures. It is therefore likely that COVID-19 pandemic impacted respondent’s behaviours and responses, although we can not state that any change is caused purely because of this.
The Community Life Survey is a nationally representative annual survey of adults (16+) in England that aims to track the latest trends and developments across areas that are key to encouraging social action and empowering communities.
The survey moved from a face-to-face mode to an online (with paper mode for those who are not digitally engaged) in 2016/17. The results included in the release are based on online/paper completes only, covering the eight years from 2013/14, when this method was first tested, to 2020/21.
Differences between groups are only reported on in this publication where they are statistically significant i.e. where we can be confident that the differences seen in our sampled respondents reflect the population.
Responsible statistician: Aleister Skinner
Statistical enquiries: evidence@dcms.gov.uk, @DCMSInsight
Estimates from the 2020/21 Community Life Survey show that among adults (16+) in England:
Most adults (95%) agreed that if they needed help there are people who would be there for them.
66% of respondents met up in person with friends or family at least once a week, a significant decrease from 2019/20 (74%).
The proportion of adults reporting they felt lonely often/always remained similar to 2019/20 at 6%.
Measures for life satisfaction, happiness and self-worth have decreased from 2019/20.
79% of respondents agree that they were satisfied with their local area as a place to live, an increase from 2019/20 (76%).
65% of respondents agreed that people in their neighbourhood pull together to improve their neighbourhood; this was higher than in 2019/20 (59%).
41% of respondents have taken part in civic participation, 19% in civic consultation, and 7% in civic activism.
27% of respondents agreed that they could personally influence decisions in their local areas.
There was a decrease in the proportion of people giving to charitable causes. 63% of respondents reported having given to charitable causes in the last 4 weeks (at the time of responding to the survey). This was lower than in 2019/20 where 75% of respondents reported doing so and the lowest since the Community Life Survey began in 2013/14.
There was a decrease in the proportion of people formally volunteering. 17% of respondents reported formally volunteering at least once a month, the lowest recorded participation rate since data collection in the Community Life Survey.
There was an increase in the proportion of people informally volunteering. 33% of respondents had volunteered informally at least once a month, the highest percentage on record in the Community Life Survey.
1. Identity and Social Network
3. Neighbourhood and Community
4. Civic Engagement and Social Action
5. Volunteering and Charitable Giving
Financial overview and grant giving statistics of Community Engagement and Opportunity Council
Public engagement files for the public
The Gilbert Town Council’s subcommittee on communications conducted a community-wide survey aimed at soliciting feedback on ways to improve communication around key issues in Gilbert.The survey was shared on Gilbert's website, social media channels and in the digital newsletter. It received 1,094 responses from February 15 through March 12, 2023.This data set contains all the individual responses, anonymized to remove any Personally Identifiable Information from survey respondents.The data set is structured so that the question asked is displayed in the header field with multiple choice responses in each row. Respondents that selected an option from the multiple choice list will show that response value. Respondents who did not select that option will show a null or blank value for the response.
Open Government Licence 3.0http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/
License information was derived automatically
Analysis of data from the Community Life Survey looking at how 16- to 24-year-olds engage with their local area, compared with adults aged 25 and over. The data covers England only.