Facebook
TwitterThe Community Life Survey is a nationally representative annual survey of adults (16+) in England that aims to track the latest trends and developments across areas that are key to encouraging social action and empowering communities.
This report summarises the findings of the 2021/22 Community Life Survey, which ran from October 2021 to September 2022. It should be noted that fieldwork, particularly during the first quarter of the 2021/22 survey, took place during the COVID-19 pandemic. It is unclear what effect the COVID-19 pandemic, associated lockdown measures and associated media coverage may have had on relevant public behaviours, attitudes and perceptions. This should be taken into consideration when interpreting results.
In 2016/17, the survey discontinued face-to-face data collection and moved fully to an online mode (with paper mode for those who are not digitally engaged).
Differences between groups are only reported on in this publication where they are statistically significant (i.e. where we can be confident that the differences seen in our sampled respondents reflect the population).
Responsible analyst: Olivia Cossey
Statistical enquiries:
Email: evidence@dcms.gov.uk
Twitter: https://twitter.com/dcmsinsight?lang=en">@DCMSInsight
Estimates from the 2021/22 Community Life Survey show that among adults (16+) in England:
95%of respondents either definitely or tended to agree that if they needed help, there are people who would be there for them; in line with 2020/21 (95%).
71%of respondents (approximately 32 million people in England) met up in person with friends/family at least once a week, a statistically significant increase from 2020/21 where the figure was 66% (30 million people), though still significantly lower than levels in 2019/20 (74%, 34 million people).
7.0 mean score for how happy people felt yesterday, an increase from a mean score of 6.8 in 2020/21. Average scores for life satisfaction and self-worth in 2021/22 were consistent with those in 2020/21.
6% of respondents (approximately 3 million people in England) said they feel lonely often or always. This is in line with reported loneliness in 2019/20 and 2020/21.
76% were satisfied with their local area as a place to live, a decrease from 79% in 2020/21, but in line with levels in 2019/20 (76%).
58% agreed that people in their neighbourhood pull together to improve the neighbourhood. This is lower than in 2020/21 (65%), but in line with levels in 2019/20 (59%).
34% of respondents said they had engaged in some form of civic participation at least once in the last 12 months; a decrease compared to levels in 2020/21 (41%).
18% had taken part in civic consultation, and 7% in civic activism; both similar levels to 2020/21.
27% of respondents agreed that they personally can influence decisions affecting their local area. This is similar to 2020/21.
16% of respondents (approximately 7 million people in England) took part in formal volunteering at least once a month in the past 12 months, in line with rates in 2020/21 (17%). However, these participation rates are the lowest recorded since data collection started on the Community Life Survey.
26% of respondents (approximately
Facebook
TwitterThe table below lists links to ad hoc statistical analyses on the Community Life Survey that have not been included in our standard publications.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/690cd9c3f5db1b22dad3e6cc/Community_Life_Survey_-_Estimates_on_Volunteering_trends_in_England.ods">Community Life Survey: Estimates on volunteering trends in England, 2013/14 to 2023/24 (ODS, 25.1 KB)
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/67ae2b74e270ceae39f9e1c0/Community_Life_Survey_-_reasons_for_pride_in_local_area_2023_24.ods">Community Life Survey: Reasons for pride/lack of pride in local area by age group, 2023/24 (ODS, 15.1 KB)
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/64771a925f7bb700127fa20c/Community_Life_Survey_-_Influencing_local_decisions.ods">Community Life Survey: Feeling able to influence decisions affecting the local area by citizenship and household income, 2019/20 to 2021/22 (ODS, 10.9 KB)
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6436be8c877741000c68d874/Community_Life_Survey_-_Strength_of_community_variables_by_Output_Area_Classifications_2017_18_to_2020_21.ods">Community Life Survey: Strength of community variables by Output Area Classification, 2017/18 to 2020/21 (ODS, 111 KB)
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6423fb862fa8480013ec0e2c/Community_Life_Survey_-_Volunteering_in_the_Heritage_Sector.ods">Community Life Survey: Volunteering in the Heritage Sector, 2021/22 (ODS, 10.8 KB)
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/62a9bd3e8fa8f50390d45147/CLS_ad_hoc_Volunteering_Final_220609_.ods">Community Life Survey: Further estimates on volunteering trends in England (ODS, 62.2 KB)
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/618cde40e90e070440c8b97e/CLS_Ad_hoc_-_member_of_public_-_Nov_2021.xlsx">Community Life Survey: Formal volunteering in groups, clubs or organisations, 2019/20 to 2020/21 (MS Excel Spreadsheet, 67.5 KB)
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/618cddd28fa8f50379269bef/ONS_ad_hoc_Nov_2021.xlsx">Community Life Survey: Feeling of being able to influence decisions that affect your local area, 2020/2021 (MS Excel Spreadsheet, 70.6 KB)
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5d010983e5274a3cf94f84ea/Community_Life_Survey_further_estimates_of_levels_of_loneliness_in_London_and_England_2017-18.xlsx">Community Life Survey: Further estimates of levels of loneliness in London and England 2017-18 (MS Excel Spreadsheet, 83.3 KB)
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5d010905e5274a3cfb11188d/Community_Life_Survey_Frequency_of_chatting_to_neighbours_2017-18.xlsx">Community Life Survey: Frequency of chatting to neighbours 2017-18</a
Facebook
TwitterThe CLS was first commissioned by the Cabinet Office in 2012. From 2016-17, the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) took over responsibility for publishing results. During 2020, the DCMS also commissioned the Community Life COVID-19 Re-contact Survey (CLRS) (SN 8781) to provide data on how the COVID-19 pandemic has affected volunteering, charitable giving, social cohesion, wellbeing and loneliness in England.
For the 2023-24 and 2024-25 survey years, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the CLS to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. This has enabled data collection at the most granular level since data collection commenced. The questionnaire for 2023-24 was developed collaboratively to adapt to the needs and interests of both DCMS and MHCLG, including some new questions and changes to existing questions, response options and definitions in the 2023-24 and upcoming 2024-25 surveys.
Background
Up to 2015-16, the survey used a face-to-face methodology. Following thorough testing (experimental online versions of the survey were released for 2013-14, 2014-15 and 2015-16), the CLS moved online from 2016-17 onwards, with an end to the previous face-to-face method. The survey uses a push-to-web methodology (with paper mode for those who are not digitally engaged). The survey informs and directs policy and action in these areas;
The CLS incorporates a small number of priority measures from the Citizenship Survey, which ran from 2001-2011, conducted by the then Department for Communities and Local Government. These measures were incorporated in the CLS so that trends in these issues could continue to be tracked over time. (The full Citizenship Survey series is held at the UK Data Archive under GNs 33347 and 33474.)
Further information may be found on the GOV.UK Community Life Survey webpage.
The Community Life Survey 2023-2024 was conducted between October 2023 and March 2024, with samples issued on a quarterly basis. The survey was conducted via an online and paper survey method called Address Based Online Surveying (ABOS). This is an affordable method of surveying the general population that still employs random sampling techniques. ABOS is a type of 'push to web' methodology, with a paper mode for those who are not digitally engaged.
A Secure Access version of the data is available under SN 9406 and includes additional demographic variables and geographic indicators. Users should note that the Secure version is subject to restrictive access conditions, and are strongly advised to check whether the Safeguarded version is suitable for their needs before considering an application for the Secure version.
Facebook
TwitterThe Community Life Survey (CLS) is a household survey conducted in England, tracking the latest trends and developments across areas key to encouraging social action and empowering communities, including: volunteering and charitable giving; views about the local area; community cohesion and belonging; community empowerment and participation; influencing local decisions and affairs; and subjective well-being and loneliness.
The CLS was first commissioned by the Cabinet Office in 2012. From 2016-17, the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) took over responsibility for publishing results. During 2020, the DCMS also commissioned the Community Life COVID-19 Re-contact Survey (CLRS) (SN 8781) to provide data on how the COVID-19 pandemic has affected volunteering, charitable giving, social cohesion, wellbeing and loneliness in England.
For the 2023-24 and 2024-25 survey years, DCMS partnered with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to boost the CLS to be able to produce meaningful estimates at Local Authority level. This has enabled data collection at the most granular level since data collection commenced. The questionnaire for 2023-24 was developed collaboratively to adapt to the needs and interests of both DCMS and MHCLG, including some new questions and changes to existing questions, response options and definitions in the 2023-24 and upcoming 2024-25 surveys.
Background
Up to 2015-16, the survey used a face-to-face methodology. Following thorough testing (experimental online versions of the survey were released for 2013-14, 2014-15 and 2015-16), the CLS moved online from 2016-17 onwards, with an end to the previous face-to-face method. The survey uses a push-to-web methodology (with paper mode for those who are not digitally engaged). The survey informs and directs policy and action in these areas;
The CLS incorporates a small number of priority measures from the Citizenship Survey, which ran from 2001-2011, conducted by the then Department for Communities and Local Government. These measures were incorporated in the CLS so that trends in these issues could continue to be tracked over time. (The full Citizenship Survey series is held at the UK Data Archive under GNs 33347 and 33474.)
Further information may be found on the GOV.UK Community Life Survey webpage.
Facebook
TwitterThe Community Life Survey was first commissioned by the Cabinet Office in 2012-2013. It is a household survey conducted in England, tracking the latest trends and developments across areas key to encouraging social action and empowering communities, including:volunteering and charitable giving;views about the local area;community cohesion and belonging;community empowerment and participation;influencing local decisions and affairs; and subjective well-beingUp to 2015-16, the survey used a face-to-face methodology. Following thorough testing, the CLS moved to an online and paper mixed-method approach from 2016-17 onwards (a paper self-completion questionnaire being available as an alternative to the online survey), with an end to previous current face-to-face method. The objectives of the survey are to: The objectives of the survey are to: provide robust, nationally representative data on behaviours and attitudes within communities to inform and direct policy and action in these areas;to provide data of value to all users, including public bodies, external stakeholders and the public; andunderpin further research and debate on building stronger communitiesThe Community Life Survey incorporates a small number of priority measures from the Citizenship Survey, which ran from 2001-2011, conducted by the Department for Communities and Local Government. These measures were incorporated in the Community Life Survey so that trends in these issues could continue to be tracked over time. (The full Citizenship Survey series is held at the UK Data Archive under GNs 33347 and 33474.)
Further information may be found on the gov.uk Community Life Survey website.
The Community Life Survey Experimental Online Data, 2013-2014 includes the Special Licence data from a project testing the viability of an online alternative to the face-to-face survey. This dataset covers the 2013-2014 online survey, with a sample size of 10,215 adults (aged 16 years and over) in England, which ran from June 2013 to March 2014. Data from a postal version of the questionnaire, which was available on request, is also included in the dataset. This questionnaire covered the same topics as the online survey but was reduced in length. Full details can be found in the Web Survey Technical Report which is available in the Documentation section below.
End User Licence and Special Licence data Users should note that there are two versions of each Community Life Survey Experimental Online Data experimental online dataset. One is available under the standard End User Licence (EUL) agreement, and the other is a Special Licence (SL) version. The SL version contains more detailed variables relating to: social class; ethnicity; religion; sexual identity and lower level geographical classifications.
The SL data have more restrictive access conditions than those made available under the standard EUL. Prospective users of the SL version will need to complete an extra application form and demonstrate to the data owners exactly why they need access to the additional variables in order to get permission to use that version. Therefore, users are strongly advised to order the standard version of the data.
The standard EUL version of the Community Life Survey Experimental Online Data, 2013-2014 is held under SN 7737.
The main topics include: identity and social networks, local community, civic engagement, volunteering, social action, subjective well-being and basic demographics.The Community Life Survey Experimental Online Data, 2013-2014: Special Licence Access data file includes the following extra variables:SOC2010 (SOC2010)SOC2010 Sub-Major Group (SOC10smg)Ethnic group: 6 categories (Ethnic6)Ethnic group: 11 categories (Ethnic11a)Respondents Ethnic origin and age (excludes Mixed/Other) (Rethage9a)Sex within Ethnicity: 11 categories (E11sex1)Sex within Ethnicity: 10 categories (E5sex1)Whether practising for each religion (Actrel)Respondent religion: 7 categories (Jewish included in other)(Relig7)Practice status for each religion (Relstat)Ethno-Religious groups: 11 categories (E11Relig1)Respondent sexual identity: 3 categories (Sid2g)ONS Ward Classification: Subgroup (2001 Wards) (Wrdsubgpg)ONS District Level Classification: Subgroup (2003) (Ladsubgpg)Output Area Classification : Subgroup (52 categories) (Oasubgrp)Rural and Urban Area Classification 2004 (Rural)
Facebook
TwitterThis dataset comes from the Community Survey questions relating to the Community Health & Well-Being performance measure: "With “10” representing the best possible life for you and “0” representing the worst, how would you say you personally feel you stand at this time?" and "With “10” representing the best possible life for you and “0” representing the worst, how do you think you will stand about five years from now?" – the results of both scores are then used to assess a Cantril Scale which is a way of assessing general life satisfaction. As per the Cantril Self-Anchoring Striving Scale, the three categories of identification are as follows: Thriving – Respondents rate their current life as a 7 or higher AND their future life as an 8 or higher. Suffering – Respondents rate their current life negatively (0 to 4) AND their future life negatively (0 to 4). Struggling – Respondents who do not meet the criteria for Thriving or Suffering. The survey is mailed to a random sample of households in the City of Tempe and has a 95% confidence level. Note on Methodology Update: In 2025, the Cantril classification method was revised to align with Gallup’s official Life Evaluation Index methodology. This change affects only a small number of respondents whose answers did not fit cleanly into the previous custom definition of “Struggling,” which classified respondents who rated their current life moderately (5 or 6) or their future life moderately or negatively (0 to 7). Under the updated approach, respondents who previously fell outside that definition are now appropriately included in the Struggling category. The overall distribution of Thriving, Struggling, and Suffering changed only minimally, and the updated methodology has been applied consistently to all prior years.This page provides data for the Community Health and Well-Being performance measure.The performance measure dashboard is available at 3.34 Community Health and Well-Being.Data Dictionary Additional InformationSource: Community Attitude Survey (Vendor: ETC Institute)Contact: Amber AsburryContact email: amber_asburry@tempe.govPreparation Method: Survey results from two questions are calculated to create a Cantril Scale value that falls into the categories of Thriving, Struggling, and Suffering.Publish Frequency: AnnuallyPublish Method: Manual
Facebook
TwitterThe Community Life Survey collects information about whether adults (16+) have volunteered and given to charitable causes.
This section provides headline data measuring engagement in formal and informal volunteering, reasons for and barriers to volunteering, as well as charitable giving behaviours and views. The data looks at engagement over time, and differences in engagement between demographic groups.
62% of respondents (approximately 28 million people in England) have volunteered in any way in the last 12 months, and 41% (approximately 19 million people in England) at least once a month.
63% (approximately 29 million people in England) of respondents said they had given to charitable causes in the last 4 weeks. This is a decrease from 2019/20 where it was measured at 75% and the lowest proportion recorded in the CLS.
Formal volunteering at least once a month in the past 12 months decreased in 2020/21 (17%) from 2019/20 (23%), the lowest that it has been recorded in the CLS.
Informal volunteering at least once a month in the past 12 months increased in 2020/21 (33%) from 2019/20 (28%), the highest that it has been recorded in the CLS.
Information about volunteering in DCMS sectors, as well as charitable giving has historically been collected in the DCMS ‘Taking Part Survey’. Volunteering and charitable giving results will vary between Taking Part and Community Life Survey. This is likely due to differences in the methods of collection and question phrasing.
In May 2019, DCMS published ‘Community Life Survey and Taking Part Survey 2017-18: Focus on volunteering by age and gender’. This report combines data from the Taking Part and Community Life surveys to explore experiences of volunteering by gender and age.
In December 2020, DCMS published ‘Community Life COVID-19 Re-contact Survey 2020- Main Report’. This report covered public beliefs and behaviours relating to social cohesion, charitable giving, volunteering, wellbeing and loneliness for adults in England during March to July 2020, and how these have changed compared with a period before the COVID-19 pandemic.
Facebook
TwitterReleased: 29 July 2021
Geographic Coverage: England
This release provides estimates on a number of measures covering social cohesion, community engagement and social action over the period of April 2020 to March 2021. The survey ran over the course of a year, recording respondents’ answers consistently over the year during different periods of lockdown measures. It is therefore likely that COVID-19 pandemic impacted respondent’s behaviours and responses, although we can not state that any change is caused purely because of this.
The Community Life Survey is a nationally representative annual survey of adults (16+) in England that aims to track the latest trends and developments across areas that are key to encouraging social action and empowering communities.
The survey moved from a face-to-face mode to an online (with paper mode for those who are not digitally engaged) in 2016/17. The results included in the release are based on online/paper completes only, covering the eight years from 2013/14, when this method was first tested, to 2020/21.
Differences between groups are only reported on in this publication where they are statistically significant i.e. where we can be confident that the differences seen in our sampled respondents reflect the population.
Responsible statistician: Aleister Skinner
Statistical enquiries: evidence@dcms.gov.uk, @DCMSInsight
Estimates from the 2020/21 Community Life Survey show that among adults (16+) in England:
Most adults (95%) agreed that if they needed help there are people who would be there for them.
66% of respondents met up in person with friends or family at least once a week, a significant decrease from 2019/20 (74%).
The proportion of adults reporting they felt lonely often/always remained similar to 2019/20 at 6%.
Measures for life satisfaction, happiness and self-worth have decreased from 2019/20.
79% of respondents agree that they were satisfied with their local area as a place to live, an increase from 2019/20 (76%).
65% of respondents agreed that people in their neighbourhood pull together to improve their neighbourhood; this was higher than in 2019/20 (59%).
41% of respondents have taken part in civic participation, 19% in civic consultation, and 7% in civic activism.
27% of respondents agreed that they could personally influence decisions in their local areas.
There was a decrease in the proportion of people giving to charitable causes. 63% of respondents reported having given to charitable causes in the last 4 weeks (at the time of responding to the survey). This was lower than in 2019/20 where 75% of respondents reported doing so and the lowest since the Community Life Survey began in 2013/14.
There was a decrease in the proportion of people formally volunteering. 17% of respondents reported formally volunteering at least once a month, the lowest recorded participation rate since data collection in the Community Life Survey.
There was an increase in the proportion of people informally volunteering. 33% of respondents had volunteered informally at least once a month, the highest percentage on record in the Community Life Survey.
1. Identity and Social Network
3. Neighbourhood and Community
4. Civic Engagement and Social Action
5. Volunteering and Charitable Giving
Facebook
TwitterFinancial overview and grant giving statistics of Community Life Center Inc.
Facebook
TwitterFinancial overview and grant giving statistics of Community Life Support Inc.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://digital.nhs.uk/about-nhs-digital/terms-and-conditionshttps://digital.nhs.uk/about-nhs-digital/terms-and-conditions
This is a monthly report on publicly funded community services for people of all ages using data from the Community Services Data Set (CSDS) reported in England for May 2024. It has been developed to help achieve better outcomes and provide data that will be used to commission services in a way that improves health, reduces inequalities, and supports service improvement and clinical quality. These statistics are classified as experimental and should be used with caution. Experimental statistics are new official statistics undergoing evaluation. More information about experimental statistics can be found on the UK Statistics Authority website (linked at the bottom of this page). A provisional data file for June 2024 is now included in this publication. Please note this is intended as an early view until providers submit a refresh of their data, which will be published next month.
Facebook
TwitterFinancial overview and grant giving statistics of Community Life Foundation International Inc.
Facebook
TwitterThe Community Life Survey collects information about the way adults (16+) perceive their neighbourhood and community.
37% of respondents (approximately 17 million people in England) agreed that they borrow from, and exchange favours with, their neighbours which was in line with 2019/20. This measure however was statistically significantly lower than in 2013/14, when data was first collected (42%, approximately 23 million people).
83% of respondents (approximately 38 million people in England) agreed that their area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together. This was in line with the 2019/20 figure.
79% of respondents (approximately 36 million people in England) were satisfied with their local area as a place to live, a statistically significant increase than in 2019/20 (76%).
65% of respondents (approximately 30 million people in England) felt they belonged to their neighbourhood. This was inline with the 2019/20 figure.
84% of respondents (approximately 38 million people in England) felt they belonged to Britain. This was inline with the 2019/20 figure.
65% of respondents (approximately 30 million people in England) agreed that people in their neighbourhood pull together to improve the neighbourhood. This is statistically significantly higher than in 2019/20 (59%) and the highest agreement recorded since the CLS began in 2013/14.
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/wellbeing/datasets/socialcapitalheadlineindicators">Social capital headline indicators, which presents data on subjects including the opinions of respondents about their neighbourhood
Facebook
Twitterhttps://digital.nhs.uk/about-nhs-digital/terms-and-conditionshttps://digital.nhs.uk/about-nhs-digital/terms-and-conditions
Due to the coronavirus illness (COVID-19) disruption, it would seem that this is now starting to affect the quality and coverage of some of our statistics, such as an increase in non-submissions for some datasets. We are also starting to see some different patterns in the submitted data. For example, fewer patients are being admitted to and discharged from hospital. Therefore, data should be interpreted with care over the COVID-19 period. This is a monthly report on publicly funded community services for people of all ages using data from the Community Services Data Set (CSDS) reported in England for December 2020. It has been developed to help achieve better outcomes and provide data that will be used to commission services in a way that improves health, reduces inequalities, and supports service improvement and clinical quality. This is the sixth report from the new version of the dataset, CSDS v1.5. As an uplift from v1.0, the v1.5 dataset collects additional data of the person's care plan details, employment status and social & personal circumstances. These statistics are classified as experimental and should be used with caution. Experimental statistics are new official statistics undergoing evaluation. More information about experimental statistics can be found on the UK Statistics Authority website.
Facebook
TwitterNote: This dataset is historical only and there are not corresponding datasets for more recent time periods. For that more-recent information, please visit the Chicago Health Atlas at https://chicagohealthatlas.org. This dataset gives the average life expectancy and corresponding confidence intervals for each Chicago community area for the years 1990, 2000 and 2010. See the full description at: https://data.cityofchicago.org/api/views/qjr3-bm53/files/AAu4x8SCRz_bnQb8SVUyAXdd913TMObSYj6V40cR6p8?download=true&filename=P:\EPI\OEPHI\MATERIALS\REFERENCES\Life Expectancy\Dataset description - LE by community area.pdf
Facebook
TwitterThis dataset gives the average life expectancy and corresponding confidence intervals for each Chicago community area for the years 1990, 2000 and 2010. See the full description at: https://data.cityofchicago.org/api/views/qjr3-bm53/files/AAu4x8SCRz_bnQb8SVUyAXdd913TMObSYj6V40cR6p8?download=true&filename=P:\EPI\OEPHI\MATERIALS\REFERENCES\Life Expectancy\Dataset description - LE by community area.pdf
Facebook
TwitterThe Community Life survey is a household self-completion survey of adults aged 16+ in England. The survey provides evidence on social cohesion, community engagement and social action. This report summarises the results from the survey and provides comparisons between London and the rest of England. There are other surveys that provide more granular evidence on these topics within London, but this survey has been selected to provide a regional comparison. Further details of the breakdowns presented in this report can be accessed through the data tables on the Community Life survey webpage.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Making life good in the community is a three year research project that examed
how best to support people with an intellectual disability living in group
homes to lead fulfilling lives.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://dataverse-staging.rdmc.unc.edu/api/datasets/:persistentId/versions/1.0/customlicense?persistentId=hdl:1902.29/H-P2795https://dataverse-staging.rdmc.unc.edu/api/datasets/:persistentId/versions/1.0/customlicense?persistentId=hdl:1902.29/H-P2795
This survey, commissioned by HUD, explores American attitudes toward community life in rural, suburban, and urban settings.Questions include personal preferences for large or small community settings for home, work, leisure, cost, local government, transportation, home ownership, education, and medical care.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Making life good in the community is a three year research project that examed
how best to support people with an intellectual disability living in group
homes to lead fulfilling lives.
Facebook
TwitterThe Community Life Survey is a nationally representative annual survey of adults (16+) in England that aims to track the latest trends and developments across areas that are key to encouraging social action and empowering communities.
This report summarises the findings of the 2021/22 Community Life Survey, which ran from October 2021 to September 2022. It should be noted that fieldwork, particularly during the first quarter of the 2021/22 survey, took place during the COVID-19 pandemic. It is unclear what effect the COVID-19 pandemic, associated lockdown measures and associated media coverage may have had on relevant public behaviours, attitudes and perceptions. This should be taken into consideration when interpreting results.
In 2016/17, the survey discontinued face-to-face data collection and moved fully to an online mode (with paper mode for those who are not digitally engaged).
Differences between groups are only reported on in this publication where they are statistically significant (i.e. where we can be confident that the differences seen in our sampled respondents reflect the population).
Responsible analyst: Olivia Cossey
Statistical enquiries:
Email: evidence@dcms.gov.uk
Twitter: https://twitter.com/dcmsinsight?lang=en">@DCMSInsight
Estimates from the 2021/22 Community Life Survey show that among adults (16+) in England:
95%of respondents either definitely or tended to agree that if they needed help, there are people who would be there for them; in line with 2020/21 (95%).
71%of respondents (approximately 32 million people in England) met up in person with friends/family at least once a week, a statistically significant increase from 2020/21 where the figure was 66% (30 million people), though still significantly lower than levels in 2019/20 (74%, 34 million people).
7.0 mean score for how happy people felt yesterday, an increase from a mean score of 6.8 in 2020/21. Average scores for life satisfaction and self-worth in 2021/22 were consistent with those in 2020/21.
6% of respondents (approximately 3 million people in England) said they feel lonely often or always. This is in line with reported loneliness in 2019/20 and 2020/21.
76% were satisfied with their local area as a place to live, a decrease from 79% in 2020/21, but in line with levels in 2019/20 (76%).
58% agreed that people in their neighbourhood pull together to improve the neighbourhood. This is lower than in 2020/21 (65%), but in line with levels in 2019/20 (59%).
34% of respondents said they had engaged in some form of civic participation at least once in the last 12 months; a decrease compared to levels in 2020/21 (41%).
18% had taken part in civic consultation, and 7% in civic activism; both similar levels to 2020/21.
27% of respondents agreed that they personally can influence decisions affecting their local area. This is similar to 2020/21.
16% of respondents (approximately 7 million people in England) took part in formal volunteering at least once a month in the past 12 months, in line with rates in 2020/21 (17%). However, these participation rates are the lowest recorded since data collection started on the Community Life Survey.
26% of respondents (approximately