6 datasets found
  1. W

    CompArg: Comparative Sentences 2019

    • anthology.aicmu.ac.cn
    • webis.de
    3237552
    Updated 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Chris Biemann; Matthias Hagen (2019). CompArg: Comparative Sentences 2019 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3237552
    Explore at:
    3237552Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    2019
    Dataset provided by
    The Web Technology & Information Systems Network
    Friedrich Schiller University Jena
    Authors
    Chris Biemann; Matthias Hagen
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    CompArg: Comparative Sentences 2019 dataset for comparative argument mining is composed of sentences annotated with BETTER / WORSE markers (the first object is better / worse than the second object) or NONE (the sentence does not contain a comparison of the target objects). The BETTER sentences stand for a pro-argument in favor of the first compared object and WORSE-sentences represent a con-argument and favor the second object.

  2. f

    Sample sentences from CompSent-19 dataset [9], with preference indications....

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated May 27, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Marzieh Babaali; Afsaneh Fatemi; Mohammad Ali Nematbakhsh (2025). Sample sentences from CompSent-19 dataset [9], with preference indications. Note: Sequence matters—preferences reference the initial entity in comparison to the subsequent one. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319824.t003
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 27, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Marzieh Babaali; Afsaneh Fatemi; Mohammad Ali Nematbakhsh
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Sample sentences from CompSent-19 dataset [9], with preference indications. Note: Sequence matters—preferences reference the initial entity in comparison to the subsequent one.

  3. r

    AC2-VMCOMG103 - Malekula comparative grammar (draft) by A. Capell

    • researchdata.edu.au
    Updated Apr 7, 2016
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    PARADISEC (2016). AC2-VMCOMG103 - Malekula comparative grammar (draft) by A. Capell [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.4225/72/56EC1E44E0FA3
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 7, 2016
    Dataset provided by
    PARADISEC
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 1970
    Area covered
    Description

    19 page typed manuscript. -- Draft prepared by Capell. Part IV Malekula Comparative Grammar. Foreward and sound laws of Malekula.; Date of recording unknown.. Language as given: Malekula

  4. r

    AC2-VCGS303 - Comparative Grammar notes of some Vanuatu languages

    • researchdata.edu.au
    Updated Mar 18, 2016
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    PARADISEC (2016). AC2-VCGS303 - Comparative Grammar notes of some Vanuatu languages [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.4225/72/56EC19FF46757
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 18, 2016
    Dataset provided by
    PARADISEC
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 1970
    Area covered
    Description

    1 page manuscript. -- Draft by Capell. The Comparative Grammar notes. Languages are Efate, Pangkumu, Malo, Baki, Bieri, Tanna and Efate.; Date of recording unknown.. Language as given: Efate, Pangkumu (Rerep), Malo, Baki, Bieri (Bieria), Tanna, Futuna

  5. f

    Comparative preference types with examples.

    • figshare.com
    xls
    Updated May 27, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Marzieh Babaali; Afsaneh Fatemi; Mohammad Ali Nematbakhsh (2025). Comparative preference types with examples. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319824.t005
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 27, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Marzieh Babaali; Afsaneh Fatemi; Mohammad Ali Nematbakhsh
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    The extraction of subjective comparative relations is essential in the field of question answering systems, playing a crucial role in accurately interpreting and addressing complex questions. To tackle this challenge, we propose the SCQRE model, specifically designed to extract subjective comparative relations from questions by focusing on entities, aspects, constraints, and preferences. Our approach leverages multi-task learning, the Natural Language Inference (NLI) paradigm, and a specialized adapter integrated into RoBERTa_base_go_emotions to enhance performance in Element Extraction (EE), Compared Elements Identification (CEI), and Comparative Preference Classification (CPC). Key innovations include handling X- and XOR-type preferences, capturing implicit comparative nuances, and the robust extraction of constraints often neglected in existing models. We also introduce the Smartphone-SCQRE dataset, along with another domain-specific dataset, Brands-CompSent-19-SCQRE, both structured as subjective comparative questions. Experimental results demonstrate that our model outperforms existing approaches across multiple question-level and sentence-level datasets and surpasses recent language models, such as GPT-3.5-turbo-0613, Llama-2-70b-chat, and Qwen-1.5-7B-Chat, showcasing its effectiveness in question-based comparative relation extraction.

  6. Average length of prison sentences for offences in England and Wales 2023/24...

    • statista.com
    Updated Apr 24, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Average length of prison sentences for offences in England and Wales 2023/24 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1100192/prison-sentence-length-in-england-and-wales-by-offence/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 24, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Apr 1, 2023 - Mar 31, 2024
    Area covered
    England
    Description

    In 2023/24 the average custodial sentence length for sexual offences in England and Wales was 69.5 months, or just over five years, the most of any broad offence type in that year. Other crimes that carried high prison sentences were robbery offences at 45.2 months, and drug offences at 41.4 months. The average length of a prison sentence for all offences in 2024 was 22.5 months, while the offences that carried the shortest sentence lengths were motoring offences. Court backlog a major concern The number of crown court cases awaiting trial in England and Wales reached a high of over 67,573 cases in late 2023, almost double the number of outstanding cases in 2019. Although the number of new crown court cases has actually been declining, the courts have struggled to keep pace by closing existing cases, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. As a consequence of these pressures, the amount of time between a criminal offence taking place and the conclusion of the case has also risen. In 2014, it took an average of 412 days for an offence to reach a conclusion in the courts, with this rising to 697 days by 2021. The UK prison system The prison population of the United Kingdom was estimated to number approximately 97,800 people, as of 2024, the vast majority of which were in England and Wales. In 2023/24, the average cost of a prison place in England and Wales was estimated at 56,987 British pounds, compared with 51,724 pounds in the previous financial year. Of the various prisons across UK jurisdictions, the largest one in terms of capacity was HMS Oakwood in the West Midlands, which had a prison population of 2,121 in 2025. Despite the construction of relatively new prisons such as Oakwood, prison overcrowding has increased recently. In September 2023, for example, there were just 768 spare prison places in England and Wales compared with almost 2,600 in April 2022.

  7. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Chris Biemann; Matthias Hagen (2019). CompArg: Comparative Sentences 2019 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3237552

CompArg: Comparative Sentences 2019

Explore at:
3237552Available download formats
Dataset updated
2019
Dataset provided by
The Web Technology & Information Systems Network
Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Authors
Chris Biemann; Matthias Hagen
License

Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically

Description

CompArg: Comparative Sentences 2019 dataset for comparative argument mining is composed of sentences annotated with BETTER / WORSE markers (the first object is better / worse than the second object) or NONE (the sentence does not contain a comparison of the target objects). The BETTER sentences stand for a pro-argument in favor of the first compared object and WORSE-sentences represent a con-argument and favor the second object.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu