This dataset contains the details of key school performance indicators like the drop-out rate, retention rate, repetition rate, and the promotion rate by levels of education for all schools.

Key Stage 1 (KS1) data for primary school pupils in Year 2 who met or exceeded the Expected Standard (EXS+) by School Ward for the 2016 onwards. The data is by school location, rather than by pupil residence. In determining, which ward the data relates to, a Schools list by wards is available. The data source is the National Consortium of Examination Results (NCER).

A summary of Calderdale school performance can be found on the Council website: School performance tables. School performance for individual schools can be found at Compare school performance.

Please note some DFE numbers might have changed please see previous DFE code on Schools list.

Key Stage 2 (KS2) data for year 6 primary school pupils who met or exceeded the Expected Standard (EXS+) by School Ward for the period 2016 onwards. The data is by school location, rather than by pupil residence. In determining, which ward the data relates to, a Schools list by wards is available. The data source is the National Consortium of Examination Results (NCER) but the figures come from the Department of Education (DfE).

A summary of Calderdale school performance can be found on the Council website: School performance tables. School performance for individual schools can be found at Compare school performance.

Please note some DFE numbers might have changed please see previous DFE code on Schools list.

This data tracks four-year graduation rates from high schools located within the City of Tempe, with data publicly available through the Arizona Department of Education.Values of “8888” are used when there are too few to count, and values of “9999” are used where there is no data available. This page provides data for the High School Graduation Rate performance measure. The performance measure dashboard is available at 3.08 High School Graduation Rates. Additional Information Source: Contact: Marie RaymondContact E-Mail: Marie_Raymond@tempe.govContact Phone: 480-585-7818Data Source: Tempe High School DistrictData Source Type: Excel Preparation Method: Arizona Department of Education (ADE) generated Excel Spreadsheets- available at https://www.azed.gov/accountability-research/data/Publish Frequency: AnnuallyPublish Method: ManualData Dictionary

Progress Reports grade each school with an A, B, C, D, or F. These reports focus on a school's learning environment, student performance, and student progress. They were designed to help parents, teachers, principals, and others understand how well schools are doing—and compare them to other, similar schools.

Year 1 (Y1) primary school pupils phonics data who met the Expected Standard for Phonics by School Ward for the period 2013 onwards.The data is by school location, rather than by pupil residence. In determining, which ward the data relates to, a Schools list by wards is available. The data source is the National Consortium of Examination Results (NCER).

A summary of Calderdale school performance can be found on the Council website: School performance tables. School performance for individual schools can be found at Compare school performance.

Please note some DFE numbers might have changed please see previous DFE code on Schools list.

Historical Dataset of Performance School is provided by PublicSchoolReview and contain statistics on metrics:Total Students Trends Over Years (2009-2023),Total Classroom Teachers Trends Over Years (2009-2023),Distribution of Students By Grade Trends,Student-Teacher Ratio Comparison Over Years (2009-2023),Asian Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2009-2013),Hispanic Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2009-2016),Black Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2009-2016),White Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2009-2012),Diversity Score Comparison Over Years (2009-2016),Free Lunch Eligibility Comparison Over Years (2013-2023),Reduced-Price Lunch Eligibility Comparison Over Years (2013-2023),Reading and Language Arts Proficiency Comparison Over Years (2010-2016),Math Proficiency Comparison Over Years (2010-2016),Overall School Rank Trends Over Years (2010-2016)

Historical Dataset of Performance Learning Center is provided by PublicSchoolReview and contain statistics on metrics:Total Students Trends Over Years (2008-2023),Total Classroom Teachers Trends Over Years (2009-2023),Distribution of Students By Grade Trends,Student-Teacher Ratio Comparison Over Years (2008-2023),American Indian Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2010-2021),Asian Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2021-2023),Hispanic Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2008-2023),Black Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2008-2023),White Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2008-2023),Two or More Races Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2013-2023),Diversity Score Comparison Over Years (2008-2023),Free Lunch Eligibility Comparison Over Years (2008-2023),Reduced-Price Lunch Eligibility Comparison Over Years (2009-2023),Reading and Language Arts Proficiency Comparison Over Years (2011-2022),Math Proficiency Comparison Over Years (2011-2022),Science Proficiency Comparison Over Years (2021-2022),Overall School Rank Trends Over Years (2011-2022),Graduation Rate Comparison Over Years (2012-2022)

This operations dashboard shows historic and current data related to this performance measure. The performance measure dashboard is available at 3.09 Post-Secondary Achievement Rate. Data Dictionary

School progress report, district scorecard, PSSA & Keystone, district graduation rate, school graduation rate, aimsweb-star, attendance, out-of-school suspensions, serious incidents, NSC student tracker reports, college matriculation, end-of-year report

This dataset contains the State, Year, Level and Gender-wise Performance Indicators in School Education. This dataset includes major indicators like Drop out Rate, Repetition Rate, Promotion Rate, Retention Rate and Transition Rate.

Educational Youth Indicators

School Enrollment, Attendance, Achievement, and Engagement

By City of Baltimore [source]

About this dataset

This dataset from the Baltimore Neighborhood Indicators Alliance-Jacob France Institute (BNIA-JFI) gathers information about education and youth across Baltimore. Through tracking 27 indicators grouped into seven categories - student enrollment and demographics, dropout rate and high school completion, student attendance, suspensions and expulsions, elementary and middle school student achievement, high school performance, youth labor force participation, and youth civic engagement - BNIA-JFI paints a comprehensive picture of education trends within the city limits. Data sourced from the Baltimore City Public School System (BCPSS), American Community Survey (ACS), as well as Maryland Department of Education allows for cross program comparison to better map connections between educational outcomes affected by neighborhood context. The 2009-2010 school year was used based on readily available data with an approximated 3.4% of address unable to be matched or geocoded and therefore not included in these calculations. Leveraging this data provides perspective to help guide decisions made at local government level that could impact thousands of lives in years ahead

More Datasets

For more datasets, click here.

Featured Notebooks

• 🚨 Your notebook can be here! 🚨!

How to use the dataset

This dataset contains valuable information about the educational performance and youth engagement in Baltimore City. It provides data on 27 indicators, grouped into seven categories: student enrollment and demographics; dropout rate and high school completion; student attendance, suspensions and expulsions; elementary and middle school student achievement; high school performance; youth labor force participation; and youth civic engagement. This dataset can be used to answer important questions about education in Baltimore, such as examining the relationship between community conditions and educational outcomes.

Before using this dataset, it’s important to understand the source of data for each indicator (e.g., Baltimore City Public School System, American Community Survey) so you can understand potential limitations inherent in each data set. Additionally, keep in mind that this dataset does not include students whose home address cannot be geocoded or matched between datasets due to inconsistency of information or other issues - this means that comparisons between some of these indicators may not be as accurate as is achievable with other datasets available from sources such as the Maryland Department of Education or the Baltimore City Public Schools System.

Once you are familiar with where the data comes from you can use it to answer these questions by exploring different trends within Baltimore city over time:

• How have student enrollment numbers changed over time?
• What has been the overall trend in dropout rates across elementary schools?
• Are there any differences in student attendance based on school type?
• What correlations exist between neighborhood community characteristics (such as crime rates or poverty levels), and academic achievement scores?
• How have rates of labor force participation among adolescents shifted year-over-year?

And more! By looking at trends by geography within this diverse city we can gain valuable insight into what factors may play a role influencing educational outcomes for children growing up in different areas around Baltimore City - an essential step for developing methodologies for successful policy interventions targeting our most vulnerable populations!

Research Ideas

• Analyzing the correlation between student achievement and socio-economic status of the neighborhoods in which students live.
• Creating targeted policies that are tailored to address specific educational issues showcased in each Baltimore neighborhood demographic.
• Using data visualizations to demonstrate to residents and community leaders how their area is performing compared to other communities in terms of education, dropout rates, suspension rates, and more

Acknowledgements

If you use this dataset in your research, please credit the original authors. Data Source

License

License: CC0 1.0 Universal (CC0 1.0) - Public Domain Dedication No Copyright - You can copy, modify, distribute and perform the work, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission. [See Other Information](https://creativecommons.org/public...

Early Years Foundation Stage Profile (EYFSP) data for reception aged primary school pupils who met Good Level of Development (GLD) Standard by School Ward for the 2013 onwards. The data is by school location, rather than by pupil residence. In determining, which ward the data relates to, a Schools list by wards is available. The data source is the National Consortium of Examination Results (NCER). A summary of Calderdale school performance can be found on the Council website: School performance tables. School performance for individual schools can be found at Compare school performance. Please note some DFE numbers might have changed please see previous DFE code on Schools list.

This dataset contains data by school on student SAT scores relative to the SAT College and Career Readiness (CCR) Benchmark score of 1550 (critical reading, mathematics and writing sections combined) for the graduating classes of 2012 and 2013. According to research conducted by the College Board*, a score of 1550 indicates that a student will have a 65 percent or greater likelihood of achieving a B- average or higher during the first year of college.

This dataset also provides an estimated SAT Participation Rate, which equals the number of SAT test-taking seniors in the school divided by the number of seniors enrolled in the school as a percentage. These participation rates are considered an estimate because the grade level of the SAT test-taker is self-reported by the student at the time of registration for the SAT while the total number of seniors enrolled in the school is reported to the Connecticut State Department of Education (CSDE) by the district. These are the best available estimates of SAT participation rates.

The Benchmark Performance reflect the results of only those who participate in the SAT. Because participation rates vary from school to school, the CSDE provides both the estimated Participation rates together with the Benchmark Performance in order to promote fair and valid comparisons across schools.

Note: The data are suppressed when there are too few test-takers to sufficiently protect privacy.

*The research report can be found at: http://research.collegeboard.org/sites/default/files/publications/2012/7/researchreport-2011-5-sat-college-readiness-benchmark-secondary-performance.pdf

Academic achievement is an important index to measure the quality of education and students’ learning outcomes. Reasonable and accurate prediction of academic achievement can help improve teachers’ educational methods. And it also provides corresponding data support for the formulation of education policies. However, traditional methods for classifying academic performance have many problems, such as low accuracy, limited ability to handle nonlinear relationships, and poor handling of data sparsity. Based on this, our study analyzes various characteristics of students, including personal information, academic performance, attendance rate, family background, extracurricular activities and etc. Our work offers a comprehensive view to understand the various factors affecting students’ academic performance. In order to improve the accuracy and robustness of student performance classification, we adopted Gaussian Distribution based Data Augmentation technique (GDO), combined with multiple Deep Learning (DL) and Machine Learning (ML) models. We explored the application of different Machine Learning and Deep Learning models in classifying student grades. And different feature combinations and data augmentation techniques were used to evaluate the performance of multiple models in classification tasks. In addition, we also checked the synthetic data’s effectiveness with variance homogeneity and P-values, and studied how the oversampling rate affects actual classification results. Research has shown that the RBFN model based on educational habit features performs the best after using GDO data augmentation. The accuracy rate is 94.12%, and the F1 score is 94.46%. These results provide valuable references for the classification of student grades and the development of intervention strategies. New methods and perspectives in the field of educational data analysis are proposed in our study. At the same time, it has also promoted innovation and development in the intelligence of the education system.

This dataset shows all school level performance data used to create CPS School Report Cards for the 2011-2012 school year. Metrics are described as follows (also available for download at http://bit.ly/uhbzah): NDA indicates "No Data Available." SAFETY ICON: Student Perception/Safety category from 5 Essentials survey // SAFETY SCORE: Student Perception/Safety score from 5 Essentials survey // FAMILY INVOLVEMENT ICON: Involved Families category from 5 Essentials survey // FAMILY INVOLVEMENT SCORE: Involved Families score from 5 Essentials survey // ENVIRONMENT ICON: Supportive Environment category from 5 Essentials survey // ENVIRONMENT SCORE: Supportive Environment score from 5 Essentials survey // INSTRUCTION ICON: Ambitious Instruction category from 5 Essentials survey // INSTRUCTION SCORE: Ambitious Instruction score from 5 Essentials survey // LEADERS ICON: Effective Leaders category from 5 Essentials survey // LEADERS SCORE: Effective Leaders score from 5 Essentials survey // TEACHERS ICON: Collaborative Teachers category from 5 Essentials survey // TEACHERS SCORE: Collaborative Teachers score from 5 Essentials survey // PARENT ENGAGEMENT ICON: Parent Perception/Engagement category from parent survey // PARENT ENGAGEMENT SCORE: Parent Perception/Engagement score from parent survey // AVERAGE STUDENT ATTENDANCE: Average daily student attendance // RATE OF MISCONDUCTS (PER 100 STUDENTS): # of misconducts per 100 students//AVERAGE TEACHER ATTENDANCE: Average daily teacher attendance // INDIVIDUALIZED EDUCATION PROGRAM COMPLIANCE RATE: % of IEPs and 504 plans completed by due date // PK-2 LITERACY: % of students at benchmark on DIBELS or IDEL // PK-2 MATH: % of students at benchmark on mClass // GR3-5 GRADE LEVEL MATH: % of students at grade level, math, grades 3-5 // GR3-5 GRADE LEVEL READ: % of students at grade level, reading, grades 3-5 // GR3-5 KEEP PACE READ: % of students meeting growth targets, reading, grades 3-5 // GR3-5 KEEP PACE MATH: % of students meeting growth targets, math, grades 3-5 // GR6-8 GRADE LEVEL MATH: % of students at grade level, math, grades 6-8 // GR6-8 GRADE LEVEL READ: % of students at grade level, reading, grades 6-8 // GR6-8 KEEP PACE MATH: % of students meeting growth targets, math, grades 6-8 // GR6-8 KEEP PACE READ: % of students meeting growth targets, reading, grades 6-8 // GR-8 EXPLORE MATH: % of students at college readiness benchmark, math // GR-8 EXPLORE READ: % of students at college readiness benchmark, reading // ISAT EXCEEDING MATH: % of students exceeding on ISAT, math // ISAT EXCEEDING READ: % of students exceeding on ISAT, reading // ISAT VALUE ADD MATH: ISAT value-add value, math // ISAT VALUE ADD READ: ISAT value-add value, reading // ISAT VALUE ADD COLOR MATH: ISAT value-add color, math // ISAT VALUE ADD COLOR READ: ISAT value-add color, reading // STUDENTS TAKING ALGEBRA: % of students taking algebra // STUDENTS PASSING ALGEBRA: % of students passing algebra // 9TH GRADE EXPLORE (2009): Average EXPLORE score, 9th graders who tested in fall 2009 // 9TH GRADE EXPLORE (2010): Average EXPLORE score, 9th graders who tested in fall 2010 // 10TH GRADE PLAN (2009): Average PLAN score, 10th graders who tested in fall 2009 // 10TH GRADE PLAN (2010): Average PLAN score, 10th graders who tested in fall 2010 // NET CHANGE EXPLORE AND PLAN: Difference between Grade 9 Explore (2009) and Grade 10 Plan (2010) // 11TH GRADE AVERAGE ACT (2011): Average ACT score, 11th graders who tested in fall 2011 // NET CHANGE PLAN AND ACT: Difference between Grade 10 Plan (2009) and Grade 11 ACT (2011) // COLLEGE ELIGIBILITY: % of graduates eligible for a selective four-year college // GRADUATION RATE: % of students who have graduated within five years // COLLEGE/ ENROLLMENT RATE: % of students enrolled in college // COLLEGE ENROLLMENT (NUMBER OF STUDENTS): Total school enrollment // FRESHMAN ON TRACK RATE: Freshmen On-Track rate

This operations dashboard shows historic and current data related to this performance measure.

This dataset shows all school level performance data used to create CPS School Report Cards for the 2011-2012 school year. Metrics are described as follows (also available for download at http://bit.ly/uhbzah): NDA indicates "No Data Available." SAFETY ICON: Student Perception/Safety category from 5 Essentials survey // SAFETY SCORE: Student Perception/Safety score from 5 Essentials survey // FAMILY INVOLVEMENT ICON: Involved Families category from 5 Essentials survey // FAMILY INVOLVEMENT SCORE: Involved Families score from 5 Essentials survey // ENVIRONMENT ICON: Supportive Environment category from 5 Essentials survey // ENVIRONMENT SCORE: Supportive Environment score from 5 Essentials survey // INSTRUCTION ICON: Ambitious Instruction category from 5 Essentials survey // INSTRUCTION SCORE: Ambitious Instruction score from 5 Essentials survey // LEADERS ICON: Effective Leaders category from 5 Essentials survey // LEADERS SCORE: Effective Leaders score from 5 Essentials survey // TEACHERS ICON: Collaborative Teachers category from 5 Essentials survey // TEACHERS SCORE: Collaborative Teachers score from 5 Essentials survey // PARENT ENGAGEMENT ICON: Parent Perception/Engagement category from parent survey // PARENT ENGAGEMENT SCORE: Parent Perception/Engagement score from parent survey // AVERAGE STUDENT ATTENDANCE: Average daily student attendance // RATE OF MISCONDUCTS (PER 100 STUDENTS): # of misconducts per 100 students//AVERAGE TEACHER ATTENDANCE: Average daily teacher attendance // INDIVIDUALIZED EDUCATION PROGRAM COMPLIANCE RATE: % of IEPs and 504 plans completed by due date // PK-2 LITERACY: % of students at benchmark on DIBELS or IDEL // PK-2 MATH: % of students at benchmark on mClass // GR3-5 GRADE LEVEL MATH: % of students at grade level, math, grades 3-5 // GR3-5 GRADE LEVEL READ: % of students at grade level, reading, grades 3-5 // GR3-5 KEEP PACE READ: % of students meeting growth targets, reading, grades 3-5 // GR3-5 KEEP PACE MATH: % of students meeting growth targets, math, grades 3-5 // GR6-8 GRADE LEVEL MATH: % of students at grade level, math, grades 6-8 // GR6-8 GRADE LEVEL READ: % of students at grade level, reading, grades 6-8 // GR6-8 KEEP PACE MATH: % of students meeting growth targets, math, grades 6-8 // GR6-8 KEEP PACE READ: % of students meeting growth targets, reading, grades 6-8 // GR-8 EXPLORE MATH: % of students at college readiness benchmark, math // GR-8 EXPLORE READ: % of students at college readiness benchmark, reading // ISAT EXCEEDING MATH: % of students exceeding on ISAT, math // ISAT EXCEEDING READ: % of students exceeding on ISAT, reading // ISAT VALUE ADD MATH: ISAT value-add value, math // ISAT VALUE ADD READ: ISAT value-add value, reading // ISAT VALUE ADD COLOR MATH: ISAT value-add color, math // ISAT VALUE ADD COLOR READ: ISAT value-add color, reading // STUDENTS TAKING ALGEBRA: % of students taking algebra // STUDENTS PASSING ALGEBRA: % of students passing algebra // 9TH GRADE EXPLORE (2009): Average EXPLORE score, 9th graders who tested in fall 2009 // 9TH GRADE EXPLORE (2010): Average EXPLORE score, 9th graders who tested in fall 2010 // 10TH GRADE PLAN (2009): Average PLAN score, 10th graders who tested in fall 2009 // 10TH GRADE PLAN (2010): Average PLAN score, 10th graders who tested in fall 2010 // NET CHANGE EXPLORE AND PLAN: Difference between Grade 9 Explore (2009) and Grade 10 Plan (2010) // 11TH GRADE AVERAGE ACT (2011): Average ACT score, 11th graders who tested in fall 2011 // NET CHANGE PLAN AND ACT: Difference between Grade 10 Plan (2009) and Grade 11 ACT (2011) // COLLEGE ELIGIBILITY: % of graduates eligible for a selective four-year college // GRADUATION RATE: % of students who have graduated within five years // COLLEGE/ ENROLLMENT RATE: % of students enrolled in college // COLLEGE ENROLLMENT (NUMBER OF STUDENTS): Total school enrollment // FRESHMAN ON TRACK RATE: Freshmen On-Track rate // RCDTS: Region County District Type Schools Code