CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
Explore our detailed website traffic dataset featuring key metrics like page views, session duration, bounce rate, traffic source, and conversion rates.
Daily utilization metrics for data.lacity.org and geohub.lacity.org. Updated monthly
Web traffic statistics for the several City-Parish websites, brla.gov, city.brla.gov, Red Stick Ready, GIS, Open Data etc. Information provided by Google Analytics.
Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset contains 145063 time series representing the number of hits or web traffic for a set of Wikipedia pages from 2015-07-01 to 2022-06-30. This is an extended version of the dataset that was used in the Kaggle Wikipedia Web Traffic forecasting competition. For consistency, the same Wikipedia pages that were used in the competition have been used in this dataset as well. The colons (:) in article names have been replaced by dashes (-) to make the .tsf file readable using our data loaders.
The data were downloaded from the Wikimedia REST API. According to the conditions of the API, this dataset is licensed under CC-BY-SA 3.0 and GFDL licenses.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This is a dataset of Tor cell file extracted from browsing simulation using Tor Browser. The simulations cover both desktop and mobile webpages. The data collection process was using WFP-Collector tool (https://github.com/irsyadpage/WFP-Collector). All the neccessary configuration to perform the simulation as detailed in the tool repository.The webpage URL is selected by using the first 100 website based on: https://dataforseo.com/free-seo-stats/top-1000-websites.Each webpage URL is visited 90 times for each deskop and mobile browsing mode.
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
Context
The data presented here was obtained in a Kali Machine from University of Cincinnati,Cincinnati,OHIO by carrying out packet captures for 1 hour during the evening on Oct 9th,2023 using Wireshark.This dataset consists of 394137 instances were obtained and stored in a CSV (Comma Separated Values) file.This large dataset could be used utilised for different machine learning applications for instance classification of Network traffic,Network performance monitoring,Network Security Management , Network Traffic Management ,network intrusion detection and anomaly detection.
The dataset can be used for a variety of machine learning tasks, such as network intrusion detection, traffic classification, and anomaly detection.
Content :
This network traffic dataset consists of 7 features.Each instance contains the information of source and destination IP addresses, The majority of the properties are numeric in nature, however there are also nominal and date kinds due to the Timestamp.
The network traffic flow statistics (No. Time Source Destination Protocol Length Info) were obtained using Wireshark (https://www.wireshark.org/).
Dataset Columns:
No : Number of Instance. Timestamp : Timestamp of instance of network traffic Source IP: IP address of Source Destination IP: IP address of Destination Portocol: Protocol used by the instance Length: Length of Instance Info: Information of Traffic Instance
Acknowledgements :
I would like thank University of Cincinnati for giving the infrastructure for generation of network traffic data set.
Ravikumar Gattu , Susmitha Choppadandi
Inspiration : This dataset goes beyond the majority of network traffic classification datasets, which only identify the type of application (WWW, DNS, ICMP,ARP,RARP) that an IP flow contains. Instead, it generates machine learning models that can identify specific applications (like Tiktok,Wikipedia,Instagram,Youtube,Websites,Blogs etc.) from IP flow statistics (there are currently 25 applications in total).
**Dataset License: ** CC0: Public Domain
Dataset Usages : This dataset can be used for different machine learning applications in the field of cybersecurity such as classification of Network traffic,Network performance monitoring,Network Security Management , Network Traffic Management ,network intrusion detection and anomaly detection.
ML techniques benefits from this Dataset :
This dataset is highly useful because it consists of 394137 instances of network traffic data obtained by using the 25 applications on a public,private and Enterprise networks.Also,the dataset consists of very important features that can be used for most of the applications of Machine learning in cybersecurity.Here are few of the potential machine learning applications that could be benefited from this dataset are :
Network Performance Monitoring : This large network traffic data set can be utilised for analysing the network traffic to identifying the network patterns in the network .This help in designing the network security algorithms for minimise the network probelms.
Anamoly Detection : Large network traffic dataset can be utilised training the machine learning models for finding the irregularitues in the traffic which could help identify the cyber attacks.
3.Network Intrusion Detection : This large dataset could be utilised for machine algorithms training and designing the models for detection of the traffic issues,Malicious traffic network attacks and DOS attacks as well.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
General data recollected for the studio " Analysis of the Quantitative Impact of Social Networks on Web Traffic of Cybermedia in the 27 Countries of the European Union".
Four research questions are posed: what percentage of the total web traffic generated by cybermedia in the European Union comes from social networks? Is said percentage higher or lower than that provided through direct traffic and through the use of search engines via SEO positioning? Which social networks have a greater impact? And is there any degree of relationship between the specific weight of social networks in the web traffic of a cybermedia and circumstances such as the average duration of the user's visit, the number of page views or the bounce rate understood in its formal aspect of not performing any kind of interaction on the visited page beyond reading its content?
To answer these questions, we have first proceeded to a selection of the cybermedia with the highest web traffic of the 27 countries that are currently part of the European Union after the United Kingdom left on December 31, 2020. In each nation we have selected five media using a combination of the global web traffic metrics provided by the tools Alexa (https://www.alexa.com/), which ceased to be operational on May 1, 2022, and SimilarWeb (https:// www.similarweb.com/). We have not used local metrics by country since the results obtained with these first two tools were sufficiently significant and our objective is not to establish a ranking of cybermedia by nation but to examine the relevance of social networks in their web traffic.
In all cases, cybermedia whose property corresponds to a journalistic company have been selected, ruling out those belonging to telecommunications portals or service providers; in some cases they correspond to classic information companies (both newspapers and televisions) while in others they refer to digital natives, without this circumstance affecting the nature of the research proposed.
Below we have proceeded to examine the web traffic data of said cybermedia. The period corresponding to the months of October, November and December 2021 and January, February and March 2022 has been selected. We believe that this six-month stretch allows possible one-time variations to be overcome for a month, reinforcing the precision of the data obtained.
To secure this data, we have used the SimilarWeb tool, currently the most precise tool that exists when examining the web traffic of a portal, although it is limited to that coming from desktops and laptops, without taking into account those that come from mobile devices, currently impossible to determine with existing measurement tools on the market.
It includes:
Web traffic general data: average visit duration, pages per visit and bounce rate Web traffic origin by country Percentage of traffic generated from social media over total web traffic Distribution of web traffic generated from social networks Comparison of web traffic generated from social netwoks with direct and search procedures
Click Web Traffic Combined with Transaction Data: A New Dimension of Shopper Insights
Consumer Edge is a leader in alternative consumer data for public and private investors and corporate clients. Click enhances the unparalleled accuracy of CE Transact by allowing investors to delve deeper and browse further into global online web traffic for CE Transact companies and more. Leverage the unique fusion of web traffic and transaction datasets to understand the addressable market and understand spending behavior on consumer and B2B websites. See the impact of changes in marketing spend, search engine algorithms, and social media awareness on visits to a merchant’s website, and discover the extent to which product mix and pricing drive or hinder visits and dwell time. Plus, Click uncovers a more global view of traffic trends in geographies not covered by Transact. Doubleclick into better forecasting, with Click.
Consumer Edge’s Click is available in machine-readable file delivery and enables: • Comprehensive Global Coverage: Insights across 620+ brands and 59 countries, including key markets in the US, Europe, Asia, and Latin America. • Integrated Data Ecosystem: Click seamlessly maps web traffic data to CE entities and stock tickers, enabling a unified view across various business intelligence tools. • Near Real-Time Insights: Daily data delivery with a 5-day lag ensures timely, actionable insights for agile decision-making. • Enhanced Forecasting Capabilities: Combining web traffic indicators with transaction data helps identify patterns and predict revenue performance.
Use Case: Analyze Year Over Year Growth Rate by Region
Problem A public investor wants to understand how a company’s year-over-year growth differs by region.
Solution The firm leveraged Consumer Edge Click data to: • Gain visibility into key metrics like views, bounce rate, visits, and addressable spend • Analyze year-over-year growth rates for a time period • Breakout data by geographic region to see growth trends
Metrics Include: • Spend • Items • Volume • Transactions • Price Per Volume
Inquire about a Click subscription to perform more complex, near real-time analyses on public tickers and private brands as well as for industries beyond CPG like: • Monitor web traffic as a leading indicator of stock performance and consumer demand • Analyze customer interest and sentiment at the brand and sub-brand levels
Consumer Edge offers a variety of datasets covering the US, Europe (UK, Austria, France, Germany, Italy, Spain), and across the globe, with subscription options serving a wide range of business needs.
Consumer Edge is the Leader in Data-Driven Insights Focused on the Global Consumer
This dataset was created by Abhinaba Saha
http://dcat-ap.de/def/licenses/cc-byhttp://dcat-ap.de/def/licenses/cc-by
The dataset contains traffic collected for 96 websites located in
Open Government Licence - Canada 2.0https://open.canada.ca/en/open-government-licence-canada
License information was derived automatically
Digital technology and Internet use, website traffic strategies, by North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) and size of enterprise for Canada from 2012 to 2013.
Top 25 Daily Page Views for the main website of Los Angeles
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This is the aggregated version of the daily dataset used in the Kaggle Wikipedia Web Traffic forecasting competition. It contains 145063 time series representing the number of hits or web traffic for a set of Wikipedia pages from 2015-07-01 to 2017-09-05, after aggregating them into weekly.
The original dataset contains missing values. They have been simply replaced by zeros before aggregation.
Traffic analytics, rankings, and competitive metrics for kaggle.com as of June 2025
Web traffic statistics for the top 2000 most visited pages on nyc.gov by month.
This dataset was created by Suruthi S
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
YouTube flows
https://www.paradoxintelligence.com/termshttps://www.paradoxintelligence.com/terms
Website visitor analytics, engagement metrics, and competitive intelligence across public companies
Unlock the Power of Behavioural Data with GDPR-Compliant Clickstream Insights.
Swash clickstream data offers a comprehensive and GDPR-compliant dataset sourced from users worldwide, encompassing both desktop and mobile browsing behaviour. Here's an in-depth look at what sets us apart and how our data can benefit your organisation.
User-Centric Approach: Unlike traditional data collection methods, we take a user-centric approach by rewarding users for the data they willingly provide. This unique methodology ensures transparent data collection practices, encourages user participation, and establishes trust between data providers and consumers.
Wide Coverage and Varied Categories: Our clickstream data covers diverse categories, including search, shopping, and URL visits. Whether you are interested in understanding user preferences in e-commerce, analysing search behaviour across different industries, or tracking website visits, our data provides a rich and multi-dimensional view of user activities.
GDPR Compliance and Privacy: We prioritise data privacy and strictly adhere to GDPR guidelines. Our data collection methods are fully compliant, ensuring the protection of user identities and personal information. You can confidently leverage our clickstream data without compromising privacy or facing regulatory challenges.
Market Intelligence and Consumer Behaviuor: Gain deep insights into market intelligence and consumer behaviour using our clickstream data. Understand trends, preferences, and user behaviour patterns by analysing the comprehensive user-level, time-stamped raw or processed data feed. Uncover valuable information about user journeys, search funnels, and paths to purchase to enhance your marketing strategies and drive business growth.
High-Frequency Updates and Consistency: We provide high-frequency updates and consistent user participation, offering both historical data and ongoing daily delivery. This ensures you have access to up-to-date insights and a continuous data feed for comprehensive analysis. Our reliable and consistent data empowers you to make accurate and timely decisions.
Custom Reporting and Analysis: We understand that every organisation has unique requirements. That's why we offer customisable reporting options, allowing you to tailor the analysis and reporting of clickstream data to your specific needs. Whether you need detailed metrics, visualisations, or in-depth analytics, we provide the flexibility to meet your reporting requirements.
Data Quality and Credibility: We take data quality seriously. Our data sourcing practices are designed to ensure responsible and reliable data collection. We implement rigorous data cleaning, validation, and verification processes, guaranteeing the accuracy and reliability of our clickstream data. You can confidently rely on our data to drive your decision-making processes.
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
On a quest to compare different cryptoexchanges, I came up with the idea to compare metrics across multiple platforms (at the moment just two). CoinGecko and CoinMarketCap are two of the biggest websites for monitoring both exchanges and cryptoprojects. In response to over-inflated volumes faked by crypto exchanges, both websites came up with independent metrics for assessing the worth of a given exchange.
Collected on May 10, 2020
CoinGecko's data is a bit more holistic, containing metrics across a multitude of areas (you can read more in the original blog post here. The data from CoinGecko consists of the following:
-Exchange Name -Trust Score (on a scale of N/A-10) -Type (centralized/decentralized) -AML (risk: How well prepared are they to handle financial crime?) -API Coverage (Blanket Measure that includes: (1) Tickers Data (2) Historical Trades Data (3) Order Book Data (4) Candlestick/OHLC (5) WebSocket API (6) API Trading (7) Public Documentation -API Last Updated (When was the API last updated?) -Bid Ask Spread (Average buy/sell spread across all pairs) -Candlestick (Available/Not) -Combined Orderbook Percentile (See above link) -Estimated_Reserves (estimated holdings of major crypto) -Grade_Score (Overall API score) -Historical Data (available/not) -Jurisdiction Risk (risk: risk of Terrorist activity/bribery/corruption?) -KYC Procedures (risk: Know Your Customer?) -License and Authorization (risk: has exchange sought regulatory approval?) -Liquidity (don't confuse with "CMC Liquidity". THIS column is a combo of (1) Web traffic & Reported Volume (2) Order book spread (3) Trading Activity (4) Trust Score on Trading Pairs -Negative News (risk: any bad news?) -Normalized Trading Volume (Trading Volume normalized to web traffic) -Normalized Volume Percentile (see above blog link) -Orderbook (available/not) -Public Documentation (got well documented API available to everyone?) -Regulatory Compliance (risk rating from compliance perspective) -Regulatory last updated (last time regulatory metrics were updated) -Reported Trading Volume (volume as listed by the exchange) -Reported Normalized Trading Volume (Ratio of normalized to reported volume [0-1]) -Sanctions (risk: risk of sanctions?) -Scale (based on: (1) Normalized Trading Volume Percentile (2) Normalized Order Book Depth Percentile -Senior Public Figure (risk: does exchange have transparent public relations? etc) -Tickers (tick tick tick...) -Trading via API (can data be traded through the API?) -Websocket (got websockets?)
-Green Pairs (Percentage of trading pairs deemed to have good liquidity) -Yellow Pairs (Percentage of trading pairs deemed to have fair liquidity -Red Pairs (Percentage of trading pairs deemed to have poor liquidity) -Unknown Pairs (percentage of trading pairs that do not have sufficient order book data)
~
Again, CoinMarketCap only has one metric (that was recently updated and scales from 1-1000, 1000 being very liquid and 1 not. You can go check the article out for yourself. In the dataset, this is the "CMC Liquidity" column, not to be confused with the "Liquidity" column, which refers to the CoinGecko Metric!
Thanks to coingecko and cmc for making their data scrapable :)
[CMC, you should try to give us a little more access to the figures that define your metric. Thanks!]
Your data will be in front of the world's largest data science community. What questions do you want to see answered?
CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
Explore our detailed website traffic dataset featuring key metrics like page views, session duration, bounce rate, traffic source, and conversion rates.