100+ datasets found
  1. d

    50 States Comparison

    • catalog.data.gov
    • s.cnmilf.com
    • +2more
    Updated Sep 1, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    data.iowa.gov (2023). 50 States Comparison [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/50-states-comparison
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 1, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    data.iowa.gov
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    This online application gives manufacturers the ability to compare Iowa to other states on a number of different topics including: business climate, education, operating costs, quality of life and workforce.

  2. Crime Statistics Comparison | DATA.GOV.HK

    • data.gov.hk
    Updated Dec 30, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    data.gov.hk (2018). Crime Statistics Comparison | DATA.GOV.HK [Dataset]. https://data.gov.hk/en-data/dataset/hk-hkpf-stat-crm-stat-compar
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 30, 2018
    Dataset provided by
    data.gov.hk
    Description

    Crime Statistics Comparison

  3. f

    DataSheet_3_To have value, comparisons of high-throughput phenotyping...

    • figshare.com
    txt
    Updated Jan 19, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Justin M. McGrath; Matthew H. Siebers; Peng Fu; Stephen P. Long; Carl J. Bernacchi (2024). DataSheet_3_To have value, comparisons of high-throughput phenotyping methods need statistical tests of bias and variance.csv [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1325221.s003
    Explore at:
    txtAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 19, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Frontiers
    Authors
    Justin M. McGrath; Matthew H. Siebers; Peng Fu; Stephen P. Long; Carl J. Bernacchi
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    The gap between genomics and phenomics is narrowing. The rate at which it is narrowing, however, is being slowed by improper statistical comparison of methods. Quantification using Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) is commonly used to assess method quality, but it is an often misleading statistic for this purpose as it is unable to provide information about the relative quality of two methods. Using r can both erroneously discount methods that are inherently more precise and validate methods that are less accurate. These errors occur because of logical flaws inherent in the use of r when comparing methods, not as a problem of limited sample size or the unavoidable possibility of a type I error. A popular alternative to using r is to measure the limits of agreement (LOA). However both r and LOA fail to identify which instrument is more or less variable than the other and can lead to incorrect conclusions about method quality. An alternative approach, comparing variances of methods, requires repeated measurements of the same subject, but avoids incorrect conclusions. Variance comparison is arguably the most important component of method validation and, thus, when repeated measurements are possible, variance comparison provides considerable value to these studies. Statistical tests to compare variances presented here are well established, easy to interpret and ubiquitously available. The widespread use of r has potentially led to numerous incorrect conclusions about method quality, hampering development, and the approach described here would be useful to advance high throughput phenotyping methods but can also extend into any branch of science. The adoption of the statistical techniques outlined in this paper will help speed the adoption of new high throughput phenotyping techniques by indicating when one should reject a new method, outright replace an old method or conditionally use a new method.

  4. Most well-known price comparison portals in the United States 2023

    • statista.com
    Updated Apr 3, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Most well-known price comparison portals in the United States 2023 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1341380/most-well-known-price-comparison-portals-in-the-united-states/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 3, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    Price comparison portals can be useful in various ways. While they allow buyers to find the best possible price available for a product, they can also help sellers to make sure that the pricing of their products remain competitive. Sellers also can use these portals to market their products in front of a very targeted audience.

    In the U.S., Google Shopping is the most well-known price comparison portal with a brand awareness of 59 percent. Second on this list are Yahoo Shopping and Bing Shop, that are recognized by almost half of the internet respondents. Shopzilla comes in fourth, followed by Shopping.com and PriceGrabber.

    For this study, brand awareness was surveyed employing the concept of aided brand recognition, showing respondents both the brand's logo and the written brand name.

    Interested in more detailed results covering all brands of this ranking and many more? Explore GCS Brand Profiles. These statistics show results of the Brand KPI survey.

  5. f

    Statistics of cricket dataset.

    • figshare.com
    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Sep 20, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Shihab Ahmed; Moythry Manir Samia; Maksuda Haider Sayma; Md. Mohsin Kabir; M. F. Mridha (2024). Statistics of cricket dataset. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0308050.t002
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 20, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Shihab Ahmed; Moythry Manir Samia; Maksuda Haider Sayma; Md. Mohsin Kabir; M. F. Mridha
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    In recent years, the surge in reviews and comments on newspapers and social media has made sentiment analysis a focal point of interest for researchers. Sentiment analysis is also gaining popularity in the Bengali language. However, Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis is considered a difficult task in the Bengali language due to the shortage of perfectly labeled datasets and the complex variations in the Bengali language. This study used two open-source benchmark datasets of the Bengali language, Cricket, and Restaurant, for our Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis task. The original work was based on the Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbors, and Convolutional Neural Network models. In this work, we used the Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers, the Robustly Optimized BERT Approach, and our proposed hybrid transformative Random Forest and Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (tRF-BERT) models to compare the results with the existing work. After comparing the results, we can clearly see that all the models used in our work achieved better results than any of the previous works on the same dataset. Amongst them, our proposed transformative Random Forest and Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers achieved the highest F1 score and accuracy. The accuracy and F1 score of aspect detection for the Cricket dataset were 0.89 and 0.85, respectively, and for the Restaurant dataset were 0.92 and 0.89 respectively.

  6. f

    Data from: Confidently Comparing Estimates with the c-value

    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    Updated Dec 15, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Deshpande, Sameer K.; Trippe, Brian L.; Broderick, Tamara (2022). Confidently Comparing Estimates with the c-value [Dataset]. https://datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov/dataset?q=0000242724
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 15, 2022
    Authors
    Deshpande, Sameer K.; Trippe, Brian L.; Broderick, Tamara
    Description

    Modern statistics provides an ever-expanding toolkit for estimating unknown parameters. Consequently, applied statisticians frequently face a difficult decision: retain a parameter estimate from a familiar method or replace it with an estimate from a newer or more complex one. While it is traditional to compare estimates using risk, such comparisons are rarely conclusive in realistic settings. In response, we propose the “c-value” as a measure of confidence that a new estimate achieves smaller loss than an old estimate on a given dataset. We show that it is unlikely that a large c-value coincides with a larger loss for the new estimate. Therefore, just as a small p-value supports rejecting a null hypothesis, a large c-value supports using a new estimate in place of the old. For a wide class of problems and estimates, we show how to compute a c-value by first constructing a data-dependent high-probability lower bound on the difference in loss. The c-value is frequentist in nature, but we show that it can provide validation of shrinkage estimates derived from Bayesian models in real data applications involving hierarchical models and Gaussian processes. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

  7. Threads and Twitter comparison 2023

    • statista.com
    Updated Jul 5, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2023). Threads and Twitter comparison 2023 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1398734/comparison-features-threads-twitter/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 5, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Jul 2023
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    On 5th July 2023, Meta Platforms released Threads, a text-focused social media platform. Joining Meta's Family of Apps, Threads focuses on real-time conversations, giving users a similar experience to Twitter. Threads offers users 500 characters per post, in comparison to Twitter's 280 characters. However, for Twitter Blue subscribers, posts can be substantially longer. Threads users can also take advantage of longer video posts, and free verification through their Instagram accounts.

    A bolt out of the (Twitter) blue

    As the tech elite attempt to fill the Twitter-shaped hole that social media users are feeling since the platform’s recent changes, the company is offering users the chance to verify themselves on the platform. The famous blue check mark, once reserved for journalists, celebrities, and public figures, can be purchased for a monthly fee. As of April 2023, there 640 thousand people were subscribing to Twitter Blue, up from 290 thousand in February 2023.

    Threads is off to a strong start

    Creating a profile on Threads is easy for Meta product users who already have an Instagram account as the new and free-to-use platform is integrated into the widely used app. With around two billion monthly active users on Instagram, it is no surprise that Threads gained 30 million sign-ups within 24 hours of being launched. Although signing up for Threads is easy, quitting the platform is not so straightforward, as deleting a Threads account results in the deactivation of the linked Instagram account.

  8. f

    Population specific performance comparison statistics.

    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    • plos.figshare.com
    Updated Feb 24, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Geoffroy, Elyse; Van Den Berg, David; Conomos, Matthew; Gignoux, Christopher R.; Blackwell, Tom; Im, Hae Kyung; Johnson, W. Craig; Durda, Peter; Lappalainen, Tuuli; Schubert, Ryan; Mikhaylova, Anna V.; Manichaikul, Ani; Mulford, Ashley J.; Thornton, Timothy A.; Guo, Xiuqing; Tracy, Russell; Rich, Stephen S.; Lange, Ethan; Rotter, Jerome I.; Cho, Michael H.; Ardlie, Kristin; Lange, Leslie; Gregga, Isabelle; Liu, Yongmei; Papanicolaou, George; Taylor, Kent D.; Clish, Clary; Aguet, Francois; Cornell, Elaine; Wheeler, Heather E.; Gerszten, Robert (2022). Population specific performance comparison statistics. [Dataset]. https://datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov/dataset?q=0000196575
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 24, 2022
    Authors
    Geoffroy, Elyse; Van Den Berg, David; Conomos, Matthew; Gignoux, Christopher R.; Blackwell, Tom; Im, Hae Kyung; Johnson, W. Craig; Durda, Peter; Lappalainen, Tuuli; Schubert, Ryan; Mikhaylova, Anna V.; Manichaikul, Ani; Mulford, Ashley J.; Thornton, Timothy A.; Guo, Xiuqing; Tracy, Russell; Rich, Stephen S.; Lange, Ethan; Rotter, Jerome I.; Cho, Michael H.; Ardlie, Kristin; Lange, Leslie; Gregga, Isabelle; Liu, Yongmei; Papanicolaou, George; Taylor, Kent D.; Clish, Clary; Aguet, Francois; Cornell, Elaine; Wheeler, Heather E.; Gerszten, Robert
    Description

    Test statistics for ANOVA and permuted F test comparing the predictive performance of different training populations for a particular model building strategy. ANOVA is run using the training population and the aptamer model ID as factors and Spearman Correlation as response. For our permuted F test the aptamer model ID is treated as a blocking factor for permutation. (XLSX)

  9. d

    Data for comparison of climate envelope models developed using...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • data.usgs.gov
    Updated Nov 26, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Geological Survey (2025). Data for comparison of climate envelope models developed using expert-selected variables versus statistical selection [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/data-for-comparison-of-climate-envelope-models-developed-using-expert-selected-variables-v
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 26, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    United States Geological Surveyhttp://www.usgs.gov/
    Description

    The data we used for this study include species occurrence data (n=15 species), climate data and predictions, an expert opinion questionnaire, and species masks that represented the model domain for each species. For this data release, we include the results of the expert opinion questionnaire and the species model domains (or masks). We developed an expert opinion questionnaire to gather information regarding expert opinion regarding the importance of climate variables in determining a species geographic range. The species masks, or model domains, were defined separately for each species using a variation of the “target-group” approach (Phillips et al. 2009), where the domain was determine using convex polygons including occurrence data for at least three phylogenetically related and similar species (Watling et al. 2012). The species occurrence data, climate data, and climate predictions are freely available online, and therefore not included in this data release. The species occurrence data were obtained primarily from the online database Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF; http://www.gbif.org/), and from scientific literature (Watling et al. 2011). Climate data were obtained from the WorldClim database (Hijmans et al. 2005) and climate predictions were obtained from the Center for Ocean-Atmosphere Prediction Studies (COAPS) at Florida State University (https://floridaclimateinstitute.org/resources/data-sets/regional-downscaling). See metadata for references.

  10. T

    WORLD by Country Dataset

    • tradingeconomics.com
    csv, excel, json, xml
    Updated Aug 18, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    TRADING ECONOMICS (2023). WORLD by Country Dataset [Dataset]. https://tradingeconomics.com/country-list/world-
    Explore at:
    xml, json, csv, excelAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 18, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    TRADING ECONOMICS
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    2025
    Area covered
    World
    Description

    This dataset provides values for WORLD reported in several countries. The data includes current values, previous releases, historical highs and record lows, release frequency, reported unit and currency.

  11. Comparative summary of telephone statistics

    • www150.statcan.gc.ca
    • open.canada.ca
    • +1more
    Updated Feb 18, 2000
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Government of Canada, Statistics Canada (2000). Comparative summary of telephone statistics [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.25318/2210009001-eng
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 18, 2000
    Dataset provided by
    Statistics Canadahttps://statcan.gc.ca/en
    Area covered
    Canada
    Description

    Comparative summary of telephone statistics, by operating details for Canada from 1976 to 1996. (Terminated)

  12. Price comparison habits before buying online worldwide 2022

    • statista.com
    Updated Nov 25, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Price comparison habits before buying online worldwide 2022 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1239795/price-comparison-online-shopping-habits/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 25, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Aug 2022
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    Price checking is a priority for at least ***** in *** online shoppers, according to an *********** survey conducted in the United States, United Kingdom, France, Germany, and Australia. Up to ** percent of respondents said they usually compared prices on a few sites before making an online purchase. On the other hand, a total of ** percent of respondents did not compare prices prior to buying online.

  13. Global social media subscriptions comparison 2023

    • statista.com
    • de.statista.com
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Stacy Jo Dixon, Global social media subscriptions comparison 2023 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/topics/1164/social-networks/
    Explore at:
    Dataset provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Authors
    Stacy Jo Dixon
    Description

    Social media companies are starting to offer users the option to subscribe to their platforms in exchange for monthly fees. Until recently, social media has been predominantly free to use, with tech companies relying on advertising as their main revenue generator. However, advertising revenues have been dropping following the COVID-induced boom. As of July 2023, Meta Verified is the most costly of the subscription services, setting users back almost 15 U.S. dollars per month on iOS or Android. Twitter Blue costs between eight and 11 U.S. dollars per month and ensures users will receive the blue check mark, and have the ability to edit tweets and have NFT profile pictures. Snapchat+, drawing in four million users as of the second quarter of 2023, boasts a Story re-watch function, custom app icons, and a Snapchat+ badge.

  14. A Comparison of Variance Estimation Methods for Regression Analyses with the...

    • data.virginia.gov
    • gimi9.com
    • +1more
    html
    Updated Sep 6, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (2025). A Comparison of Variance Estimation Methods for Regression Analyses with the Mental Health Surveillance Study Clinical Sample [Dataset]. https://data.virginia.gov/dataset/a-comparison-of-variance-estimation-methods-for-regression-analyses-with-the-mental-health-surv
    Explore at:
    htmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 6, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administrationhttps://www.samhsa.gov/
    Description

    The purpose of this report is to compare alternative methods for producing measures of SEs for regression models for the MHSS clinical sample with the goal of producing more accurate and potentially smaller SEs.

  15. r

    Comparison of statistical methods used to meta-analyse results from...

    • researchdata.edu.au
    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    • +1more
    Updated Feb 24, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Simon Turner; Monica Taljaard; Joanne McKenzie; Elizabeth Korevaar; Andrew Forbes; AMALIA KARAHALIOS (2023). Comparison of statistical methods used to meta-analyse results from interrupted time series studies: an empirical study - Code and data [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.26180/21280791.V2
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 24, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Monash University
    Authors
    Simon Turner; Monica Taljaard; Joanne McKenzie; Elizabeth Korevaar; Andrew Forbes; AMALIA KARAHALIOS
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    ITS data collected as part of Comparison of statistical methods used to meta-analyse results from interrupted time series studies: an empirical study.

    Code used to analyse the ITS studies.

  16. f

    Data from: Comparing statistical analyses to estimate thresholds in...

    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    • plos.figshare.com
    Updated Apr 8, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Krull, Marcos (2020). Comparing statistical analyses to estimate thresholds in ecotoxicology [Dataset]. https://datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov/dataset?q=0000586709
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 8, 2020
    Authors
    Krull, Marcos
    Description

    Different methods are used in ecotoxicology to estimate thresholds in survival data. This paper uses Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate the accuracy of three methods (maximum likelihood (MLE) and Markov Chain Monte Carlo estimates (Bayesian) of the no-effect concentration (NEC) model and Piecewise regression) in estimating true and apparent thresholds in survival experiments with datasets having different slopes, background mortalities, and experimental designs. Datasets were generated with models that include a threshold parameter (NEC) or not (log-logistic). Accuracy was estimated using root-mean square errors (RMSEs), and RMSE ratios were used to estimate the relative improvement in accuracy by each design and method. All methods had poor performances in shallow and intermediate curves, and accuracy increased with the slope of the curve. The EC5 was generally the most accurate method to estimate true and apparent thresholds, except for steep curves with a true threshold. In that case, the EC5 underestimated the threshold, and MLE and Bayesian estimates were more accurate. In most cases, information criteria weights did not provide strong evidence in support of the true model, suggesting that identifying the true model is a difficult task. Piecewise regression was the only method where the information criteria weights had high support for the threshold model; however, the rate of spurious threshold model selection was also high. Even though thresholds are an attractive concept from a regulatory and practical point of view, threshold estimates, under the experimental conditions evaluated in this work, should be carefully used in survival analysis or when there are any biological reasons to support the existence of a threshold.

  17. p

    Data from: Mosier

    • publicschoolreview.com
    json, xml
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Public School Review, Mosier [Dataset]. https://www.publicschoolreview.com/mosier-profile
    Explore at:
    json, xmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Public School Review
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 1991 - Dec 31, 2025
    Description

    Historical Dataset of Mosier is provided by PublicSchoolReview and contain statistics on metrics:Total Students Trends Over Years (1991-2023),Total Classroom Teachers Trends Over Years (2005-2023),Distribution of Students By Grade Trends,Student-Teacher Ratio Comparison Over Years (2005-2023),Asian Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (1992-2023),Hispanic Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (1993-2023),Black Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (1992-2023),White Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (1991-2023),Two or More Races Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2009-2023),Diversity Score Comparison Over Years (1991-2023),Free Lunch Eligibility Comparison Over Years (2000-2023),Reduced-Price Lunch Eligibility Comparison Over Years (1999-2023),Reading and Language Arts Proficiency Comparison Over Years (2011-2022),Math Proficiency Comparison Over Years (2012-2023),Overall School Rank Trends Over Years (2012-2023)

  18. i

    Comparing spatial statistical methods to detect amphibian road mortality...

    • iepnb.es
    • pre.iepnb.es
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Comparing spatial statistical methods to detect amphibian road mortality hotspots. - Dataset - CKAN [Dataset]. https://iepnb.es/catalogo/dataset/comparing-spatial-statistical-methods-to-detect-amphibian-road-mortality-hotspots1
    Explore at:
    License

    MIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Animal mortality on roads is one of the main concerns on wildlife conservation. Due to their habitat requirements, amphibians became one of the most commonly road-killed group and this may affect their population viability. Implementation of mitigation measures may overcome the problem. However, due to the extensive road network, their application is very expensive and required a better understanding in where they should be implemented. Mortality hotspots can be identified as clusters of road-killed records) using GIS (Geographic Information Systems). Although there are several statistical methods available, it is lacking a comparison analysis of them in order to understand their pros and contras. The aim of this study was to analyse possible differences between global, multi-scale and local spatial analysis methods in defining hotspots using amphibian road fatality data collected in northern Portugal country roads. We calculated the Nearest neighbor index, Morans I and Getis-ord General in order to compare the global clustering of points in seven sampled roads, and three were identified as clustered. We used Ripley K-function, Ripley L-function and F function to calculate the best scale for Malo's equation and Kernel density analysis in detecting hotspots and we compared their detection performance with Local Indicators of Association (LISA) (i.e Local Moran's I and Getis-ord Gi). Three different GIS software applications were used: ArcGis, Quantum GIS with R (opensource) and GeoDa (opensource). Results showed the importance of using multidistance spatial cluster analysis to define the best scale for hotspot detection with Malo´s equation and Kernel density analysis. Here we also suggest the advantages of Local Indicators of Association (LISA) for detecting clusters with the contribution of each individual observation (Local Morans I and Getis-ord Gi).

  19. FTB EITC Summary of CA Residents Year Comparison Feb 2025

    • data.ca.gov
    • catalog.data.gov
    pdf
    Updated May 13, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    California Franchise Tax Board (2025). FTB EITC Summary of CA Residents Year Comparison Feb 2025 [Dataset]. https://data.ca.gov/dataset/ftb-eitc-summary-of-ca-residents-year-comparison-feb-2025
    Explore at:
    pdf(183035)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 13, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    California Franchise Tax Boardhttp://ftb.ca.gov/
    Area covered
    California
    Description

    Produced by the Economic & Statistical Research Bureau, monthly tabulations of tax filings statistics for the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), Young Child Tax Credit (YCTC) and Foster Youth Tax Credit (FYTC) provide credit use by county, preparer type, credit amount allowed number of dependents and a many other useful cross-sections.

  20. Comparison of furloughed jobs data, UK: March 2020 to January 2021

    • gov.uk
    • s3.amazonaws.com
    Updated Mar 5, 2021
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Office for National Statistics (2021). Comparison of furloughed jobs data, UK: March 2020 to January 2021 [Dataset]. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/comparison-of-furloughed-jobs-data-uk-march-2020-to-january-2021
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 5, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    GOV.UKhttp://gov.uk/
    Authors
    Office for National Statistics
    Area covered
    United Kingdom
    Description

    Official statistics are produced impartially and free from political influence.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
data.iowa.gov (2023). 50 States Comparison [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/50-states-comparison

50 States Comparison

Explore at:
14 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
Dataset updated
Sep 1, 2023
Dataset provided by
data.iowa.gov
Area covered
United States
Description

This online application gives manufacturers the ability to compare Iowa to other states on a number of different topics including: business climate, education, operating costs, quality of life and workforce.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu