Sheet 1 (Raw-Data): The raw data of the study is provided, presenting the tagging results for the used measures described in the paper. For each subject, it includes multiple columns: A. a sequential student ID B an ID that defines a random group label and the notation C. the used notation: user Story or use Cases D. the case they were assigned to: IFA, Sim, or Hos E. the subject's exam grade (total points out of 100). Empty cells mean that the subject did not take the first exam F. a categorical representation of the grade L/M/H, where H is greater or equal to 80, M is between 65 included and 80 excluded, L otherwise G. the total number of classes in the student's conceptual model H. the total number of relationships in the student's conceptual model I. the total number of classes in the expert's conceptual model J. the total number of relationships in the expert's conceptual model K-O. the total number of encountered situations of alignment, wrong representation, system-oriented, omitted, missing (see tagging scheme below) P. the researchers' judgement on how well the derivation process explanation was explained by the student: well explained (a systematic mapping that can be easily reproduced), partially explained (vague indication of the mapping ), or not present.

Tagging scheme:
Aligned (AL) - A concept is represented as a class in both models, either

with the same name or using synonyms or clearly linkable names; Wrongly represented (WR) - A class in the domain expert model is incorrectly represented in the student model, either (i) via an attribute, method, or relationship rather than class, or (ii) using a generic term (e.g., user'' instead ofurban planner''); System-oriented (SO) - A class in CM-Stud that denotes a technical implementation aspect, e.g., access control. Classes that represent legacy system or the system under design (portal, simulator) are legitimate; Omitted (OM) - A class in CM-Expert that does not appear in any way in CM-Stud; Missing (MI) - A class in CM-Stud that does not appear in any way in CM-Expert.

All the calculations and information provided in the following sheets

originate from that raw data.

Sheet 2 (Descriptive-Stats): Shows a summary of statistics from the data collection,

including the number of subjects per case, per notation, per process derivation rigor category, and per exam grade category.

Sheet 3 (Size-Ratio):

The number of classes within the student model divided by the number of classes within the expert model is calculated (describing the size ratio). We provide box plots to allow a visual comparison of the shape of the distribution, its central value, and its variability for each group (by case, notation, process, and exam grade) . The primary focus in this study is on the number of classes. However, we also provided the size ratio for the number of relationships between student and expert model.

Sheet 4 (Overall):

Provides an overview of all subjects regarding the encountered situations, completeness, and correctness, respectively. Correctness is defined as the ratio of classes in a student model that is fully aligned with the classes in the corresponding expert model. It is calculated by dividing the number of aligned concepts (AL) by the sum of the number of aligned concepts (AL), omitted concepts (OM), system-oriented concepts (SO), and wrong representations (WR). Completeness on the other hand, is defined as the ratio of classes in a student model that are correctly or incorrectly represented over the number of classes in the expert model. Completeness is calculated by dividing the sum of aligned concepts (AL) and wrong representations (WR) by the sum of the number of aligned concepts (AL), wrong representations (WR) and omitted concepts (OM). The overview is complemented with general diverging stacked bar charts that illustrate correctness and completeness.

For sheet 4 as well as for the following four sheets, diverging stacked bar

charts are provided to visualize the effect of each of the independent and mediated variables. The charts are based on the relative numbers of encountered situations for each student. In addition, a "Buffer" is calculated witch solely serves the purpose of constructing the diverging stacked bar charts in Excel. Finally, at the bottom of each sheet, the significance (T-test) and effect size (Hedges' g) for both completeness and correctness are provided. Hedges' g was calculated with an online tool: https://www.psychometrica.de/effect_size.html. The independent and moderating variables can be found as follows:

Sheet 5 (By-Notation):

Model correctness and model completeness is compared by notation - UC, US.

Sheet 6 (By-Case):

Model correctness and model completeness is compared by case - SIM, HOS, IFA.

Sheet 7 (By-Process):

Model correctness and model completeness is compared by how well the derivation process is explained - well explained, partially explained, not present.

Sheet 8 (By-Grade):

Model correctness and model completeness is compared by the exam grades, converted to categorical values High, Low , and Medium.

his project involves the creation of an interactive Excel dashboard for SwiftAuto Traders to analyze and visualize car sales data. The dashboard includes several visualizations to provide insights into car sales, profits, and performance across different models and manufacturers. The project makes use of various charts and slicers in Excel for the analysis.

Objective: The primary goal of this project is to showcase the ability to manipulate and visualize car sales data effectively using Excel. The dashboard aims to provide:

Profit and Sales Analysis for each dealer. Sales Performance across various car models and manufacturers. Resale Value Analysis comparing prices and resale values. Insights into Retention Percentage by car models. Files in this Project: Car_Sales_Kaggle_DV0130EN_Lab3_Start.xlsx: The original dataset used to create the dashboard. dashboards.xlsx: The final Excel file that contains the complete dashboard with interactive charts and slicers. Key Visualizations: Average Price and Year Resale Value: A bar chart comparing the average price and resale value of various car models. Power Performance Factor: A column chart displaying the performance across different car models. Unit Sales by Model: A donut chart showcasing unit sales by car model. Retention Percentage: A pie chart illustrating customer retention by car model. Tools Used: Microsoft Excel for creating and organizing the visualizations and dashboard. Excel Slicers for interactive filtering. Charts: Bar charts, pie charts, column charts, and sunburst charts. How to Use: Download the Dataset: You can download the Car_Sales_Kaggle_DV0130EN_Lab3_Start.xlsx file from Kaggle and follow the steps to create a similar dashboard in Excel. Open the Dashboard: The dashboards.xlsx file contains the final version of the dashboard. Simply open it in Excel and start exploring the interactive charts and slicers.

All Comparisons of Differentially Expressed Genes - excel sheet containing the annotations and fold change values of the all the differentially expressed genes between the different clone comparisonsFinal List of Common Genes - excel sheet containing the list of genes that were commonly differentially expressed between all the aphid clone comparisons. Also contains table and bar chart presenting the number of times each candidate gene selected from previous literature was found in each aphid clone comparison.Non-direct and Direct Competition - excel sheet containing number of nymphs produced by all 6 clones on the 3 host plants in the non-direct competition, and the number of nymphs produced by the two clones NS and Viola in the direct competition experiment.sterror - excel sheet containing the means and standard error values of the 6 grouped resistant and susceptible clones in the non-direct competition experiment, used to make the bar plot for the non-direct competition experiment.sterror2 - excel sheet containing the means and standard error values of the resistant clone Viola and susceptible clone NS in the direct competition experiment, used to make the bar plot for the direct competition experiment.cabbagettest - excel sheet containing the number of nymphs produce by the 6 grouped resistant and susceptible clones on the 3 host plants, used to conduct the unpaired t tests to compare the reproductive performance of resistant and susceptible clones on the 3 different host plants when in not in competitiondirectcompetition - excel sheet containing the number of nymphs produce by the resistant clone Viola and susceptible clone NS on the 3 host plants, used to conduct the unpaired t tests comparing the reproductive performance of resistant and susceptible clones on the 3 different host plants when in direct competitionAPHID HOST SHIFT DISS Rscript - R script containing all my statistical tests: unpaired t tests of resistant and susceptible clones on the 3 host plants when in direct and non direct competition, and kruskal Wallis tests and post hoc Dunns test to identify significant differences between individual and resistant and susceptible clones on the different host plants. Also contains all my code for my bar charts for the non-direct and direct competition experiments and the code for my box plots showing the significant differences between individual clones and resistant and susceptible clones on the different host plants.Up and Down-regulated Genes Graph - excel sheet containing the number of and and down regulated genes in each aphid clone comparison and the bar graph generated from this data.

📊 Road Accident Data Analysis: Interactive Excel Dashboard 🚗

Excited to share my Kaggle project focusing on road accident data analysis. Leveraging Excel's power, I've developed an interactive dashboard offering comprehensive insights for safer roads.

Key Aspects:

Data Processing & Cleaning: Ensured data reliability through meticulous processing. KPIs: Primarily focused on Total Casualties, with detailed breakdowns for Fatal, Serious, Slight, and by Car type. Visualizations: Engaging charts - Doughnuts, Line, Bar, and Pie - offering a holistic view of accident trends. Interactivity: User-friendly features include Urban/Rural and Year filters for dynamic exploration. Unique Insights:

Monthly Trends: Line chart for a nuanced comparison of current vs. previous year casualties. Road Type Breakdown: Bar chart to showcase casualties distributed across different road types. Geospatial Analysis: Doughnut charts detailing casualties by location and area. Call for Collaboration: Seeking Kaggle community input for refinement and optimization. Let's collectively contribute to making our roads safer through data-driven insights!

DataAnalysis #RoadSafety #InteractiveDashboard #KaggleProject #Excel #DataVisualization #CollaborationOpportunity

Looking forward to your feedback and contributions! 🚀🌐

Numerical data (Excel spreadsheet) that underly the graphs in Figs 2G, 2H, 4E, 5E, 6I, 6J, 7C,