This online application gives manufacturers the ability to compare Iowa to other states on a number of different topics including: business climate, education, operating costs, quality of life and workforce.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Comparison of OR tables between the interaction of rs7522462 and rs11945978 in the WTCCC data with the shared controls (left) and the interaction of the proxy SNPs, rs296533 and rs2089509 in the IBDGC data (right). The legend to this table is the same as that of Table 3.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
## Overview
Comparison is a dataset for object detection tasks - it contains Logos QN1Z annotations for 430 images.
## Getting Started
You can download this dataset for use within your own projects, or fork it into a workspace on Roboflow to create your own model.
## License
This dataset is available under the [CC BY 4.0 license](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/CC BY 4.0).
The NADAC Weekly Comparison identifies the drug products with current NADAC rates that are replaced with new NADAC rates. Other changes (e.g. NDC additions and terminations) to the NADAC file are not reflected in this comparison. Note: Effective Date was not recorded in the dataset until 6/7/2017
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This excel file will do a statistical tests of whether two ROC curves are different from each other based on the Area Under the Curve. You'll need the coefficient from the presented table in the following article to enter the correct AUC value for the comparison: Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1983) A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 148:839-843.
A listing of costs, brochures and popular benefits in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP) based on search criteria.
The data-comparison extension for CKAN provides a means to compare data from CSV or XLSX files through visualization. Targeted at CKAN 2.9, this plugin enhances data analysis capabilities by allowing users to visually compare datasets directly within the CKAN environment. This facilitates a more intuitive understanding of data variations and trends. Key Features: CSV/XLSX File Comparison: Allows direct comparison of data contained in CSV and XLSX file formats. Visualization: Leverages visualization tools to present the data comparison results. Chart.js Integration: Employs Chart.js library for creating interactive and customizable charts used in the visualization process. Technical Integration: The data-comparison extension integrates with CKAN by adding a plugin that needs to be activated via the ckan.plugins setting in the CKAN configuration file (/etc/ckan/default/ckan.ini). It also requires the installation of Chart.js using npm to render the visualizations. After installing the extension and modifying the CKAN configurations file, CKAN needs to be restarted for the changes to take effect. Benefits & Impact: Implementing the data-comparison extension offers several benefits, especially for data-driven organizations. By providing visualization-based comparison of datasets, it enables quicker insights and potentially more informed decision-making.
WebGPT Comparisons contains all of the comparisons marked as suitable for reward modelling from the WebGPT paper.
Price comparison portals can be useful in various ways. While they allow buyers to find the best possible price available for a product, they can also help sellers to make sure that the pricing of their products remain competitive. Sellers also can use these portals to market their products in front of a very targeted audience.
In the U.S., Google Shopping is the most well-known price comparison portal with a brand awareness of 59 percent. Second on this list are Yahoo Shopping and Bing Shop, that are recognized by almost half of the internet respondents. Shopzilla comes in fourth, followed by Shopping.com and PriceGrabber.
For this study, brand awareness was surveyed employing the concept of aided brand recognition, showing respondents both the brand's logo and the written brand name.
Interested in more detailed results covering all brands of this ranking and many more? Explore GCS Brand Profiles. These statistics show results of the Brand KPI survey.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Today’s consumers take an active role in the buying process. Instead of sitting back and waiting for brands to come to them, they’ll conduct their own research to find the best item. Who wants to wait around when there’s a whole world at our fingertips? Despite the active role consumers play in their shopping fate, […]
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
## Overview
Test Comparison is a dataset for object detection tasks - it contains Ball Robot Human annotations for 921 images.
## Getting Started
You can download this dataset for use within your own projects, or fork it into a workspace on Roboflow to create your own model.
## License
This dataset is available under the [CC BY 4.0 license](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/CC BY 4.0).
Leonardo6/Daiso10-comparison dataset hosted on Hugging Face and contributed by the HF Datasets community
Nursing Home Compare has detailed information about every Medicare and Medicaid nursing home in the country. A nursing home is a place for people who can’t be cared for at home and need 24-hour nursing care. These are the official datasets used on the Medicare.gov Nursing Home Compare Website provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. These data allow you to compare the quality of care at every Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing home in the country, including over 15,000 nationwide.
On 5th July 2023, Meta Platforms released Threads, a text-focused social media platform. Joining Meta's Family of Apps, Threads focuses on real-time conversations, giving users a similar experience to Twitter. Threads offers users 500 characters per post, in comparison to Twitter's 280 characters. However, for Twitter Blue subscribers, posts can be substantially longer. Threads users can also take advantage of longer video posts, and free verification through their Instagram accounts.
A bolt out of the (Twitter) blue
As the tech elite attempt to fill the Twitter-shaped hole that social media users are feeling since the platform’s recent changes, the company is offering users the chance to verify themselves on the platform. The famous blue check mark, once reserved for journalists, celebrities, and public figures, can be purchased for a monthly fee. As of April 2023, there 640 thousand people were subscribing to Twitter Blue, up from 290 thousand in February 2023.
Threads is off to a strong start
Creating a profile on Threads is easy for Meta product users who already have an Instagram account as the new and free-to-use platform is integrated into the widely used app. With around two billion monthly active users on Instagram, it is no surprise that Threads gained 30 million sign-ups within 24 hours of being launched. Although signing up for Threads is easy, quitting the platform is not so straightforward, as deleting a Threads account results in the deactivation of the linked Instagram account.
In 2023, nearly ** percent of Italian online shoppers reported to have used comparison websites to find information on shipping and delivery conditions. Another ** percent of surveyed consumers looked for special offers and discounts, while shipping and delivery conditions came in third (45.8 percent).
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
## Overview
IR Algos Comparison is a dataset for object detection tasks - it contains Multiple Classes annotations for 1,200 images.
## Getting Started
You can download this dataset for use within your own projects, or fork it into a workspace on Roboflow to create your own model.
## License
This dataset is available under the [CC BY 4.0 license](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/CC BY 4.0).
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Statistical comparison of multiple time series in their underlying frequency patterns has many real applications. However, existing methods are only applicable to a small number of mutually independent time series, and empirical results for dependent time series are only limited to comparing two time series. We propose scalable methods based on a new algorithm that enables us to compare the spectral density of a large number of time series. The new algorithm helps us efficiently obtain all pairwise feature differences in frequency patterns between M time series, which plays an essential role in our methods. When all M time series are independent of each other, we derive the joint asymptotic distribution of their pairwise feature differences. The asymptotic dependence structure between the feature differences motivates our proposed test for multiple mutually independent time series. We then adapt this test to the case of multiple dependent time series by partially accounting for the underlying dependence structure. Additionally, we introduce a global test to further enhance the approach. To examine the finite sample performance of our proposed methods, we conduct simulation studies. The new approaches demonstrate the ability to compare a large number of time series, whether independent or dependent, while exhibiting competitive power. Finally, we apply our methods to compare multiple mechanical vibrational time series.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
We compare 330 ARCH-type models in terms of their ability to describe the conditional variance. The models are compared out-of-sample using DM?$ exchange rate data and IBM return data, where the latter is based on a new data set of realized variance. We find no evidence that a GARCH(1,1) is outperformed by more sophisticated models in our analysis of exchange rates, whereas the GARCH(1,1) is clearly inferior to models that can accommodate a leverage effect in our analysis of IBM returns. The models are compared with the test for superior predictive ability (SPA) and the reality check for data snooping (RC). Our empirical results show that the RC lacks power to an extent that makes it unable to distinguish good and bad models in our analysis.
Apache License, v2.0https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
License information was derived automatically
Converted from: https://modelscope.cn/datasets/damo/CValues-Comparison/summary. We obtained harmless set by selecting pos_type="拒绝为主" and neg_type="风险回复". We obtained helpful set by selecting pos_type="拒绝&正向建议" and neg_type="拒绝为主".
This online application gives manufacturers the ability to compare Iowa to other states on a number of different topics including: business climate, education, operating costs, quality of life and workforce.