Annual data on the nature of fraud and computer misuse offences. Data for the year ending March 2021 and March 2022 are from the Telephone-operated Crime Survey for England and Wales (TCSEW).

In 2024, the most common type of cybercrime reported to the United States internet Crime Complaint Center was phishing, with its variation, spoofing, affecting approximately 193,000 individuals. In addition, over 86,000 cases of extortion were reported to the IC3 during that year. Dynamic of phishing attacks Over the past few years, phishing attacks have increased significantly. In 2024, over 193,000 individuals fell victim to such attacks. The highest number of phishing scam victims since 2018 was recorded in 2021, approximately 324 thousand.Phishing attacks can take many shapes. Bulk phishing, smishing, and business e-mail compromise (BEC) are the most common types. With the recent development of generative AI, it has become easier to craft a believable phishing e-mail. This is currently among the top concerns of organizations leaders. Impact of phishing attacks Among the most targeted industries by cybercriminals are healthcare, financial, manufacturing, and education institutions. An observation carried out in the fourth quarter of 2024 found that software-as-a-service (SaaS) and webmail was most likely to encounter phishing attacks. According to the reports, almost a quarter of them stated being targeted by a phishing scam in the measured period.

Estimates from Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW) on fraud and computer misuse. Also data from Home Office police recorded crime on the number of online offences recorded by the police and Action Fraud figures broken down by police force area.

These tables were formerly known as Experimental tables.

Please note: This set of tables are no longer produced. All content previously released within these tables has, or will be, redistributed among other sets of tables.

Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.The Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW) asks a sole adult in a random sample of households about their, or their household's, experience of crime victimisation in the previous 12 months. These are recorded in the victim form data file (VF). A wide range of questions are then asked, covering demographics and crime-related subjects such as attitudes to the police and the criminal justice system (CJS). These variables are contained within the non-victim form (NVF) data file. In 2009, the survey was extended to children aged 10-15 years old; one resident of that age range was also selected from the household and asked about their experience of crime and other related topics. The first set of children's data covered January-December 2009 and is held separately under SN 6601. From 2009-2010, the children's data cover the same period as the adult data and are included with the main study.The Telephone-operated Crime Survey for England and Wales (TCSEW) became operational on 20 May 2020. It was a replacement for the face-to-face CSEW, which was suspended on 17 March 2020 because of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. It was set up with the intention of measuring the level of crime during the pandemic. As the pandemic continued throughout the 2020/21 survey year, questions have been raised as to whether the year ending March 2021 TCSEW is comparable with estimates produced in earlier years by the face-to-face CSEW. The ONS Comparability between the Telephone-operated Crime Survey for England and Wales and the face-to-face Crime Survey for England and Wales report explores those factors that may have a bearing on the comparability of estimates between the TCSEW and the former CSEW. These include survey design, sample design, questionnaire changes and modal changes.More general information about the CSEW may be found on the ONS Crime Survey for England and Wales web page and for the previous BCS, from the GOV.UK BCS Methodology web page.History - the British Crime SurveyThe CSEW was formerly known as the British Crime Survey (BCS), and has been in existence since 1981. The 1982 and 1988 BCS waves were also conducted in Scotland (data held separately under SNs 4368 and 4599). Since 1993, separate Scottish Crime and Justice Surveys have been conducted. Up to 2001, the BCS was conducted biennially. From April 2001, the Office for National Statistics took over the survey and it became the CSEW. Interviewing was then carried out continually and reported on in financial year cycles. The crime reference period was altered to accommodate this. Secure Access CSEW dataIn addition to the main survey, a series of questions covering drinking behaviour, drug use, self-offending, gangs and personal security, and intimate personal violence (IPV) (including stalking and sexual victimisation) are asked of adults via a laptop-based self-completion module (questions may vary over the years). Children aged 10-15 years also complete a separate self-completion questionnaire. The questionnaires are included in the main documentation, but the data are only available under Secure Access conditions (see SN 7280), not with the main study. In addition, from 2011 onwards, lower-level geographic variables are also available under Secure Access conditions (see SN 7311).New methodology for capping the number of incidents from 2017-18The CSEW datasets available from 2017-18 onwards are based on a new methodology of capping the number of incidents at the 98th percentile. Incidence variables names have remained consistent with previously supplied data but due to the fact they are based on the new 98th percentile cap, and old datasets are not, comparability has been lost with years prior to 2012-2013. More information can be found in the 2017-18 User Guide (see SN 8464) and the article ‘Improving victimisation estimates derived from the Crime Survey for England and Wales’. Fraud and Cyber Crime Module The Office for National Statistics have recently completed a substantial project to develop new questions on fraud (both online and offline) and other types of cyber crime for inclusion in the Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW). The project involved the development, cognitive testing and piloting of a number of screener questions designed to identify who had experienced different types of fraud and cyber crime. The final screener questions were incorporated into the live survey in April 2015 and are now being asked of half the sample of survey respondents. New victimisation module questions have also been developed to capture more detailed information about the offence and to allow accurate coding of the offences recorded. These were introduced into the live survey from October 2015, following testing in a large-scale field trial which took place between May and August 2015, and which was beneficial in testing how the screener and victimisation module questions work together in a live setting. More information about this project can be found on the Office for National Statistics webpage. Main Topics: Experiences of fraud and cyber crime among resident household population in England and Wales. Multi-stage stratified random sample Face-to-face interview 2014 2015 ADMINISTRATION OF J... ADOLESCENTS ADVICE AGE AGGRESSIVENESS ALCOHOL RELATED CRIME ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOUR ASSAULT ATTITUDES AUDIO EQUIPMENT BICYCLES BURGLARY CHRONIC ILLNESS CLUBS COMMUNITIES COMMUNITY ACTION COMMUNITY BEHAVIOUR COMPUTER SECURITY COMPUTER VIRUSES COMPUTERS COSTS CREDIT CARD USE CRIME AND SECURITY CRIME PREVENTION CRIME VICTIMS CRIMINAL DAMAGE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION CRIMINAL JUSTICE SY... CRIMINALS CULTURAL GOODS CULTURAL IDENTITY CYBERCRIME Community Crime and law enfor... DAMAGE DISCIPLINE DOMESTIC RESPONSIBI... ECONOMIC ACTIVITY ECONOMIC VALUE EDUCATIONAL ATTENDANCE EDUCATIONAL ENVIRON... ELECTRONIC MAIL EMPLOYEES EMPLOYMENT ETHNIC CONFLICT ETHNIC GROUPS EVERYDAY LIFE EXPOSURE TO NOISE England and Wales FAMILIES FAMILY MEMBERS FEAR FEAR OF CRIME FINANCIAL CRIME FRAUD FRIENDS GENDER GUNS HARASSMENT HEADS OF HOUSEHOLD HEALTH HEALTH STATUS HOME OWNERSHIP HOUSEHOLD HEAD S EC... HOUSEHOLD HEAD S OC... HOUSEHOLDS HOUSING TENURE Health behaviour INDUSTRIES INTERNET ACCESS INTERNET USE INTERPERSONAL CONFLICT LANDLORDS LAW ENFORCEMENT LEGAL PROCEDURE MARITAL STATUS MOBILE PHONES NEIGHBOURHOODS NEIGHBOURS OFFENCES ONLINE SERVICES PARENTS PERSONAL CONTACT PERSONAL FASHION GOODS PERSONAL IDENTIFICA... PERSONAL SAFETY POLICE OFFICERS POLICE SERVICES POLICING PREJUDICE PUBLIC HOUSES PUBLIC TRANSPORT QUALIFICATIONS QUALITY OF LIFE RECIDIVISM REFUSE RELIGIOUS AFFILIATION RENTED ACCOMMODATION RESIDENTIAL MOBILITY RESPONSIBILITY RISK ROAD SAFETY ROBBERY SCHOOL DISCIPLINE SCHOOL PUNISHMENTS SECURITY SYSTEMS SELF EMPLOYED SIBLINGS SMARTPHONES SOCIAL ACTIVITIES L... SOCIAL HOUSING SOCIAL PARTICIPATION SOCIAL SUPPORT STUDENT BEHAVIOUR STUDENTS Social behaviour an... THEFT TRAINING COURSES UNDERAGE DRINKING UNEMPLOYMENT UNWAGED WORKERS VOLUNTARY WELFARE O... WEAPONS WORKPLACE YOUTH YOUTH CRIME YOUTH CULTURE YOUTH EMPLOYMENT YOUTH GANGS YOUTH UNEMPLOYMENT urban and rural life

This survey is part of a series of cross-sectional online polls. The series begins in 2019. Questions focus on three main areas, cyber offending, cyber victimization, and criminology. Demographic and other computer-use questions are also included.

Computer crime has become an alarming problem in Hong Kong since 2020. In the recent decade, the number of computer crime incidents increased by ***** folds. In 2022, the figure approached ****** cases, representing a year-over year growth of over ** percent.

In 2022, around four in ten internet users worldwide have ever experienced cybercrime. Based on a survey conducted between November and December 2022, internet users in India were most likely to have fallen victim to cybercrime, as nearly 70 percent of respondents claimed to have ever experienced cybercrime. The United States ranked second, with almost half of the respondents, 49 percent, saying they had experienced internet crime.

This survey is part of a series of cross-sectional online polls that begin in 2019. The questions focus on three main areas: cyber offending, cyber victimization, and criminology. Demographic and other computer-use questions are also included.The current 2022 sample here includes three separate samples. These include the U.S. sample (English), the Hungarian sample (Hungarian), and the Finnish sample (Finnish). Separate Surveys and sample variables are included.

Data from the Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW) and the National Fraud Intelligence Bureau (NFIB), including numbers of incidents and characteristics of victims.

Crime isn't a topic most people want to use mental energy to think about. We want to avoid harm, protect our loved ones, and hold on to what we claim is ours. So how do we remain vigilant without digging too deep into the filth that is crime? Data, of course. The focus of our study is to explore possible trends between crime and communities in the city of Calgary. Our purpose is visualize Calgary criminal behaviour in order to help increase awareness for both citizens and law enforcement. Through the use of our visuals, individuals can make more informed decisions to improve the overall safety of their lives. Some of the main concerns of the study include: how crime rates increase with population, which areas in Calgary have the most crime, and if crime adheres to time-sensative patterns.

In 2024, the monetary damage caused by cybercrime reported to the United States' Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) saw a significant year-over-year increase, amounting to a historical peak of **** billion U.S. dollars. Overview of cybercrime in the U.S. Cybercrime continues to be one of the biggest challenges for governments around the world. In the United States, ****************** and ********* were among the most reported categories of cybercrime in 2024, with over ******* individuals falling victim to phishing attacks. Additionally, data breaches cost the U.S. organizations over ************ U.S. dollars on average as of February 2024. Fraud involving elderly Along with other reported internet crimes, online fraud is continuously growing. Targeting one of the most vulnerable groups, the elderly, cybercriminals show notorious skills in ************************************************************. Furthermore, individuals aged 60 and older, reported falling victims of extortion and personal data breach in 2024.

Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.Background: The Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW), previously known as the British Crime Survey (BCS), has been in existence since 1981. The survey traditionally asks a sole randomly selected adult, in a random sample of households, details pertaining to any instances where they, or the household, has been a victim of a crime in the previous 12 months. These are recorded in the victim form data file (VF). A wide range of questions are then asked covering demographics and crime-related subjects such as attitudes to the police and the criminal justice system (CJS). Most of the questionnaire is completed in a face-to-face interview in the respondent's home; these variables are contained within the non-victim form (NVF) data file. Since 2009, the survey has been extended to children aged 10-15 years old; one resident of that age range has also been selected at random from the household and asked about incidents where they have been a victim of crime, and other related topics. The first set of children's data, covering January-December 2009, had experimental status, and is held separately under SN 6601. From 2009-2010, the children's data cover the same period as the adult data and are included with the main dataset. Further information may be found on the ONS Crime Survey for England and Wales web page and for the previous BCS, from the GOV.UK BCS Methodology web page. Self-completion data: A series of questions on drinking behaviour, drug use and intimate personal violence (including stalking and sexual victimisation) are administered to adults via a self-completion module which the respondent completes on a laptop computer. Children aged 10-15 years also complete a separate self-completion questionnaire. The questions are contained within the main questionnaire documents, but the data are not available with the main survey; they are available only under Secure Access conditions. Lower-level geographic variables are also available under Secure Access conditions to match to the survey. History: Up to 2001, the survey was conducted biennially. From April 2001, interviewing was carried out continually and reported on in financial year cycles and the crime reference period was altered to accommodate this change. The core sample size has increased from around 11,000 in the earlier cycles to over 40,000. Following the National Statistician's Review of Crime Statistics in June 2011 the collation and publication of Crime Statistics moved to the Office for National Statistics (ONS) from 1st April 2012, and the survey changed its name to the Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW) accordingly. Scottish data: The 1982 and 1988 BCS waves were also conducted in Scotland. The England and Wales data for 1982 and 1988 are held at the UKDA under SNs 1869 and 2706, but the Scottish data for these studies are held separately under SNs 4368 and 4599. Since 1993, separate Scottish Crime and Justice Surveys have been conducted, see the series web page for more details.New methodology for capping the number of incidents from 2017-18The CSEW datasets available from 2017-18 onward are based upon a new methodology of capping the number of incidents at the 98th percentile. Incidence variables names have remained consistent with previously supplied data but due to the fact they are based on the new 98th percentile cap, and old data sets are not, comparability has been lost with previous years. More information can be found in the 2017-18 User Guide and the article ‘Improving victimisation estimates derived from the Crime Survey for England and Wales’. ONS intend to publish all micro data back to 1981 with incident data based on the 98th percentile cap later in 2019. The main CSEW 1996-2020 Secure Access dataset (SN 7280) includes:the adult and child data also held in the standard End User Licence (EUL) versionadult self-completion modules on drinking behaviour, drug use, stolen goods, children's self-completion modules and sexual identity and low-level geography variables formerly held under Special Licence access conditions (please note that not all modules occur for each year - see the survey year's documentation for details)hate crime variables HATEMT3A-HATEMT3I and HATEPS3A-HATEPS3I from the Victim Formthe interpersonal violence (IPV) data (comprising the modules on domestic violence, sexual victimisation and stalking)Users who do not require access to the modules noted above should apply for the EUL version. The Secure Access version has more restrictive access conditions than the standard EUL version - see the 'Access' tab. All studies in the series can be viewed from the Crime Survey for England and Wales series webpage. This study also includes the following low-level geography variables from 2008 onwards:Local Authority DistrictRural and Urban Area ClassificationPolice Force AreaONS District Level Classification: SupergroupONS District Level Classification: GroupONS District Level Classification: SubgroupOutput Area Classification - Supergroup (7 categories)Output Area Classification - Group (21 categories)Output Area Classification - Subgroup (52 categories)A further CSEW low-level geography file including variables down to Super Output Areas (Lower Layer) is available under separate Secure Access study SN 7311. Latest edition information: For the 12th edition (November 2023), a 'bolt-on' data file containing incident numbers for the 2011-2012 Victim Form, and an accompanying data dictionary, were added to the study.

Police-reported cybercrime, by cyber-related violation (homicide, invitation to sexual touching, sexual exploitation, luring a child via a computer, voyeurism, non-consensual distribution of intimate images, extortion, criminal harassment, indecent/harassing communications, uttering threats, fraud, identity theft, identity fraud, mischief, fail to comply with order, indecent acts, child pornography, making or distribution of child pornography, public morals, breach of probation), Canada (selected police services), 2014 to 2024.

Police-reported cybercrime, number of incidents and rate per 100,000 population, Canada, provinces, territories, Census Metropolitan Areas and Canadian Forces Military Police, 2014 to 2024.

The annual number of complaints of cybercrime received annually on the U.S. Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) website increased significantly between 2000 and 2024. The center received nearly 860,000 complaints in the most recently reported year.

Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW) and Home Office police recorded crime data, by quarterly time periods.

Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.The Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW) asks a sole adult in a random sample of households about their, or their household's, experience of crime victimisation in the previous 12 months. These are recorded in the victim form data file (VF). A wide range of questions are then asked, covering demographics and crime-related subjects such as attitudes to the police and the criminal justice system (CJS). These variables are contained within the non-victim form (NVF) data file. In 2009, the survey was extended to children aged 10-15 years old; one resident of that age range was also selected from the household and asked about their experience of crime and other related topics. The first set of children's data covered January-December 2009 and is held separately under SN 6601. From 2009-2010, the children's data cover the same period as the adult data and are included with the main study.The Telephone-operated Crime Survey for England and Wales (TCSEW) became operational on 20 May 2020. It was a replacement for the face-to-face CSEW, which was suspended on 17 March 2020 because of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. It was set up with the intention of measuring the level of crime during the pandemic. As the pandemic continued throughout the 2020/21 survey year, questions have been raised as to whether the year ending March 2021 TCSEW is comparable with estimates produced in earlier years by the face-to-face CSEW. The ONS Comparability between the Telephone-operated Crime Survey for England and Wales and the face-to-face Crime Survey for England and Wales report explores those factors that may have a bearing on the comparability of estimates between the TCSEW and the former CSEW. These include survey design, sample design, questionnaire changes and modal changes.More general information about the CSEW may be found on the ONS Crime Survey for England and Wales web page and for the previous BCS, from the GOV.UK BCS Methodology web page.History - the British Crime SurveyThe CSEW was formerly known as the British Crime Survey (BCS), and has been in existence since 1981. The 1982 and 1988 BCS waves were also conducted in Scotland (data held separately under SNs 4368 and 4599). Since 1993, separate Scottish Crime and Justice Surveys have been conducted. Up to 2001, the BCS was conducted biennially. From April 2001, the Office for National Statistics took over the survey and it became the CSEW. Interviewing was then carried out continually and reported on in financial year cycles. The crime reference period was altered to accommodate this. Secure Access CSEW dataIn addition to the main survey, a series of questions covering drinking behaviour, drug use, self-offending, gangs and personal security, and intimate personal violence (IPV) (including stalking and sexual victimisation) are asked of adults via a laptop-based self-completion module (questions may vary over the years). Children aged 10-15 years also complete a separate self-completion questionnaire. The questionnaires are included in the main documentation, but the data are only available under Secure Access conditions (see SN 7280), not with the main study. In addition, from 2011 onwards, lower-level geographic variables are also available under Secure Access conditions (see SN 7311).New methodology for capping the number of incidents from 2017-18The CSEW datasets available from 2017-18 onwards are based on a new methodology of capping the number of incidents at the 98th percentile. Incidence variables names have remained consistent with previously supplied data but due to the fact they are based on the new 98th percentile cap, and old datasets are not, comparability has been lost with years prior to 2012-2013. More information can be found in the 2017-18 User Guide (see SN 8464) and the article ‘Improving victimisation estimates derived from the Crime Survey for England and Wales’. CSEW Historic back series – dataset update (March 2022)From January 2019, all releases of crime statistics using CSEW data adopted a new methodology for measuring repeat victimisation (moving from a cap of 5 in the number of repeat incidents to tracking the 98th percentile value for major crime types). To maintain a consistent approach across historic data, all datasets back to 2001 have been revised to the new methodology. The change affects all incident data and related fields. A “bolt-on” version of the data has been created for the 2001/02 to 2011/12 datasets. This “bolt-on” dataset contains only variables previously supplied impacted by the change in methodology. These datasets can be merged onto the existing BCS NVF and VF datasets. A template ‘merge’ SPSS syntax file is provided, which will need to be adapted for other software formats.For the sixth edition (March 2022), “bolt-on” datasets for the NVF and VF files, example merge syntax and additional documentation have been added to the study to accommodate the latest CSEW repeat victimisation measurement methodology. See the documentation for further details. Main Topics: The dataset includes information from two sections of the survey, the non-victim form questionnaire and the victim form questionnaire. The non-victim form questionnaire gathers respondent-level data: topics covered include fear of crime; perception of local area; local crime rates; victimisation screener questions; experiences of the police; attitudes to the CJS; crime prevention and security; witnessing crime; technology crime; the night-time economy and alcohol disorder; identity fraud; experiences of antisocial behaviour; crime and disorder in town centres and high streets; demographic information. The victim form contains offence-level data. Up to six different incidents are asked about for each respondent. Each of these constitutes a separate victim form and can be matched back to the respondent-level data through the variable ROWLABEL. Topics covered include the nature and circumstances of the incident, details of offenders, security measures, costs, emotional reactions, contact with the CJS and outcomes where known. From October 2016, the self-completion questionnaire modules covering drug use, drinking behaviour, and domestic violence, sexual victimisation and stalking are subject to Controlled data access conditions - see SN 7280. Multi-stage stratified random sample Face-to-face interview 2006 2007 ADMINISTRATION OF J... ADOLESCENTS ADVICE AGE AGGRESSIVENESS AIRPORTS ALCOHOL USE ALCOHOLISM AMPHETAMINES ANABOLIC STEROIDS ANGER ASSAULT ATTITUDES BICYCLES BINGE DRINKING BURGLARY CAMERAS CANNABIS CAR PARKING AREAS CHILDREN CHRONIC ILLNESS CLUBS COCAINE COLOUR TELEVISION R... COMBATIVE SPORTS COMMUNITIES COMMUNITY ACTION COMMUNITY BEHAVIOUR COMMUNITY SAFETY COMMUNITY SERVICE P... COMPUTER SECURITY COMPUTERS COSTS COUNSELLING COURT CASES CREDIT CARD USE CRIME AND SECURITY CRIME PREVENTION CRIME VICTIMS CRIMINAL COURTS CRIMINAL DAMAGE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION CRIMINAL JUSTICE SY... CRIMINALS CULTURAL GOODS CULTURAL IDENTITY Crime and law enfor... DAMAGE DEBILITATIVE ILLNESS DISCIPLINE DOGS DOMESTIC RESPONSIBI... DOMESTIC VIOLENCE DOORS DRINKING BEHAVIOUR DRIVING DRUG ABUSE ECONOMIC ACTIVITY ECONOMIC VALUE ECSTASY DRUG ELECTRONIC MAIL EMERGENCY AND PROTE... EMOTIONAL DISTURBANCES EMOTIONAL STATES EMPLOYEES EMPLOYMENT EMPLOYMENT HISTORY ETHNIC CONFLICT ETHNIC GROUPS EVERYDAY LIFE EXPOSURE TO NOISE England and Wales FAMILIES FAMILY MEMBERS FEAR FEAR OF CRIME FINANCIAL COMPENSATION FINANCIAL RESOURCES FIRE FIRE DAMAGE FIRE SAFETY MEASURES FRIENDS GENDER HARASSMENT HEADS OF HOUSEHOLD HEALTH HEALTH PROFESSIONALS HEROIN HOME CONTENTS INSUR... HOME OWNERSHIP HOSPITALIZATION HOURS OF WORK HOUSEHOLD HEAD S EC... HOUSEHOLD HEAD S OC... HOUSEHOLD INCOME HOUSEHOLDS HOUSING AGE HOUSING TENURE INDUSTRIES INFORMATION MATERIALS INFORMATION SOURCES INJURIES INSURANCE CLAIMS INTERNET ACCESS INTERNET USE INTERPERSONAL COMMU... INTERPERSONAL CONFLICT INTERPERSONAL RELAT... INTRUDER ALARM SYSTEMS JUDGES JUDGMENTS LAW JURIES JUVENILE DELINQUENCY LANDLORDS LAW ENFORCEMENT LEARNING DISABILITIES LEAVE LEGAL PROCEDURE LIGHTING LOCAL GOVERNMENT SE... LOCKS LSD DRUG MAGIC MUSHROOMS MAGISTRATES MARITAL STATUS MEDIATION MEDICAL CARE METHADONE MOBILE PHONES MOTOR VEHICLES NEIGHBOURHOODS NEIGHBOURS NEWSPAPER READERSHIP NEWSPAPERS OFFENCES OFFENSIVE TELEPHONE... ONLINE SHOPPING PAYMENTS PERSONAL CONTACT PERSONAL FASHION GOODS PERSONAL IDENTIFICA... PERSONAL SAFETY POLICE OFFICERS POLICE SERVICES POLICING POLITICAL PARTICIPA... PORNOGRAPHY PRISON SENTENCES PROBATION PROSECUTION SERVICE PUBLIC HOUSES PUBLIC OPINION PUNISHMENT PURCHASING QUALIFICATIONS QUALITY OF LIFE RADIO RECEIVERS RECIDIVISM REFUSE RENTED ACCOMMODATION RESIDENTIAL MOBILITY RESPONSIBILITY RISK ROBBERY SCHOOL PUNISHMENTS SECURITY SYSTEMS SELF EMPLOYED SEXUAL ASSAULT SEXUAL BEHAVIOUR SEXUAL HARASSMENT SEXUAL OFFENCES SHARED HOME OWNERSHIP SICK LEAVE SLEEP DISORDERS SMALL BUSINESSES SMOKING SOCIAL ACTIVITIES L... SOCIAL HOUSING SOCIAL PARTICIPATION SOCIAL SUPPORT SOLVENT ABUSE SORROW SPOUSE S ECONOMIC A... SPOUSES STUDENTS SUPERVISORY STATUS Social behaviour an... THEFT TIED HOUSING TRAFFIC OFFENCES TRAINING TRAINING COURSES TRANQUILLIZERS UNDERAGE DRINKING UNEMPLOYMENT UNWAGED WORKERS VAGRANTS VIDEO RECORDERS VISITS PERSONAL VOLUNTARY WELFARE O... WEAPONS WINDOWS WITNESS INTIMIDATION WITNESSES WORKPLACE YOUNG OFFENDERS YOUTH YOUTH COURTS YOUTH CRIME

Trends in Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW) crime and Home Office police recorded crime for England and Wales, by offence type. Also includes more detailed data on crime such as violence, fraud and anti-social behaviour.

As of January 2024, around 58 percent of large companies in the United Kingdom (UK) had experienced cybercrime within the past year. Medium businesses ranked second, with 45 percent of companies experiencing cybercrime. Overall, about 22 percent of UK businesses stated having experienced any form of cybercrime in the preceding year.

India Cyber Crime: IPC Section: Number of Cases Registered data was reported at 33,798.000 Unit in 2022. This records an increase from the previous number of 25,384.000 Unit for 2021. India Cyber Crime: IPC Section: Number of Cases Registered data is updated yearly, averaging 738.000 Unit from Dec 2002 (Median) to 2022, with 21 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 33,798.000 Unit in 2022 and a record low of 176.000 Unit in 2008. India Cyber Crime: IPC Section: Number of Cases Registered data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by National Crime Records Bureau. The data is categorized under India Premium Database’s Crime – Table IN.CRA001: Crime Statistics.