Multifamily Portfolio datasets (section 8 contracts) - The information has been compiled from multiple data sources within FHA or its contractors. HUD oversees more than 22,000 privately owned multifamily properties, and more than 1.4 million assisted housing units. These homes were originally financed with FHA-insured or Direct Loans and many are supported with Section 8 or other rental assistance contracts. Our existing stock of affordable rental housing is a critical resource for seniors and families who otherwise would not have access to safe, decent places to call home.

The following dataset is a listing of all active County contracts. This list is updated daily. Contract spending information can be found at: https://data.montgomerycountymd.gov/Finance-Tax-Property/Contract-Spending/wv2m-su7v

Update Frequency: Daily

Database provides is updated daily list of active contracts/master agreements. Data provides vendor name, vendor location and contact information, purpose of contract, start date, expiration date, authorized users, and purchasing agent's contact information. Public can also access the contract documents, bid abstract/pricing, notice of intent to award, and the terms and conditions that apply.

Contract information for the entire MCA, incl. letters of tender, request to purchase, contractual delegation, dates, extensions etc.

Public contracts sample. Bogotá-Colombia. Incorporates corruption red flags measures.

Gain a Competitive Edge in the US Government Contracting Landscape with Cosmic Link Data

Empower your business development and government contracting efforts with Cosmic Link Data, the premier source for comprehensive and verified data on US government contractors.

What Makes Our Data Unique?

Verified & Up-to-Date: Our data undergoes rigorous verification processes, ensuring accuracy and reliability.

Real-Time & Historical: Make informed decisions with the latest data feeds, complemented by 60 days of historical data for trend analysis.

Granular Insights: Dive deep into B2B company profiles, NAICS codes, equipment utilized, industries served, certifications, SAM registration status, and precise geolocation for targeted outreach.

How is the Data Sourced?

We cultivate a multi-source approach, combining verified B2B information, industry directories, government databases, and supplier self-reported data. This comprehensive strategy guarantees the most accurate and current picture of the US government contracting landscape.

Primary Use Cases and Verticals:

Business Development: Identify and target qualified government contractors for potential partnerships and collaborations.

Government Contracting: Streamline your bidding process by pinpointing contractors with the specific capabilities and certifications required for government projects.

Cosmic Link Data as Part of Your Broader Strategy:

This data product seamlessly integrates with our broader US manufacturing data offerings. This allows you to gain a holistic view of the entire ecosystem, from raw materials and components to finished goods and distribution channels, with a specific focus on government contracting capabilities.

By leveraging Cosmic Link Data, you can:

Shorten sales cycles: Identify the right leads faster and increase your win rates on government contracts.

Optimize resource allocation: Focus your resources on the most promising opportunities.

Gain a competitive edge: Make data-driven decisions and confidently navigate the dynamic world of US government contracting.

The Office of Contracting and Procurement (OCP) is required to post contract awards valued at $100,000 or more for agencies served by OCP. The awarded contracts database includes a caption describing the type of goods or services provided, the contract number, the ordering agency, the contract amount, the period of time covered by the contract award, the contractor receiving the award, and the market type. To obtain a copy of any contract, you may submit a FOIA request online via the DC government Public FOIA Portal. Data has been updated to include agency budget code, name, and acronym attributes. Budget codes were used to assign the agency name and acronym to each record. Agencies that share the same budget code, such as those under the Executive Office of the Mayor, were left blank in PASS records. For questions regarding details within the data, contact the Office of Contracting and Procurement at https://contracts.ocp.dc.gov/contact.

Details of DSA contracts awarded and expiry/renewal dates

Contracts and modifications awarded by the City of Chicago since 1993. This data is currently maintained in the City’s Financial Management and Purchasing System (FMPS), which is used throughout the City for contract management and payment. Legacy System Records: Purchase Order/Contract Numbers that begin with alpha characters identify records imported from legacy systems. Records with a null value in the Contract Type field were imported from legacy systems. "Comptroller-Other" Contract Type: Some records where the Contract Type is "COMPTROLLER-OTHER" are ordinance-based agreements and may have start dates earlier than 1993. Depends Upon Requirements Contracts: If the contract Award Amount is $0, the contract is not cancelled, and the contract is a blanket contract, then the contract award total Depends Upon Requirements. A Depends Upon Requirements contract is an indefinite quantities contract in which the City places orders as needed and the vendor is not guaranteed any particular contract award amount. Blanket vs. Standard Contracts: Only blanket contracts (contracts for repeated purchases) have FMPS end dates. Standard contracts (for example, construction contracts) terminate upon completion and acceptance of all deliverables. These dates are tracked outside of FMPS. Negative Modifications: Some contracts are modified to delete scope and money from a contract. These reductions are indicated by negative numbers in the Award Amount field of this dataset. Data Owner: Procurement Services. Time Period: 1993 to present. Frequency: Data is updated daily.

FCO(S) - Details of current contracts/framework agreements

The Credit Card Agreements (CCA) database includes credit card agreements from more than 600 card issuers. These agreements include general terms and conditions, pricing, and fee information and are collected quarterly pursuant to requirements in the CARD Act. This dataset includes data for the years 2020-2024.

The Dataset contains the notices, calls for tenders and tender results in an open format collected by the SCP - Public Contract Service database managed by the General Directorate for regulation and public contracts of the Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport. More information is available on the website www.serviziocontrattipubblici.it which allows contracting authorities to publish notices and tenders for works, services and supplies and other information. Servizio Contratti Pubblici is one of the national databases owned by the Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport listed in Annex B of Legislative Decree no. 97/2016 (art. 9) which modifies the publication obligation set forth in the legislation on transparency Legislative Decree Legislative Decree n.33/2013 (art. 9bis). The data relating to tenders are also available in Open Contracting Data Standard (OCDS) format The data are updated daily.

🇬🇧 영국

The purpose of this site is to allow public access to the City's procurement contracts. These contracts represent a diverse list of resources required by Tempe to support the community's needs including equipment, vehicles, products, materials and services. Click on Open or double arrow to enter full screen mode.In line with the City's strong commitment to transparency and Smart City initiatives, we are pleased to make this information available in this accessible format.A user guide may be viewed by clicking here.Additional InformationSource: The original data source originates from the City of Tempe's Purchasing Contracts document storage and the purchasing contract financials application.Contact (author): Contact E-Mail (author): Contact (maintainer): Michael Greene, Procurement AdministrationContact E-Mail (maintainer): michael_greene@tempe.govData Source Type: Data Source Types are: Sql Server, Oracle and pdf file storage.Preparation Method: Data is extracted using a programmatic automation process that pulls data from the defined sources at regular time intervals.Publish Frequency: Once per week.Publish Method: Automatic via developed automation process.Data Dictionary

The San Francisco Controller's Office maintains a database of contracts and payments made to Suppliers (vendors, contractors and grantees). The Supplier Contracts shown here include all fully executed, expenditure-only contracts, including City contracts for commodities, professional and general services, and construction from fiscal year 2018 forward, based upon the contracting departments' inputs. This data set includes both departmental and citywide contracts.

This data is presented on the Supplier Contracts report hosted at http://openbook.sfgov.org, and is also available in CSV format, which lists summary data by contract. We have removed sensitive contracts and information from this data in order to balance disclosure requirements and protected/confidential data. For example, we have removed contracts related to certain legal proceedings that are exempt from disclosure. New data is added on a weekly basis.

Revenue contracts, including concessions and rental income contracts, are not included in this data set; they are tracked in departmental subsystems and currently are not available in SF Open Book. For more information about Revenue Contracts, please contact the respective City Department that awards the contract, e.g. for Airport Concession Contracts, contact the San Francisco Airport Commission which maintains these records.

City Department spending may occur three ways: 1) from Contract to Purchase Order (i.e. a PO with an accounting Encumbrance) to Payment (i.e. an accounting Voucher), AKA On-Contract spending, 2) direct-to-Purchase Order (no contract, only a PO agreement and accounting Encumbrance) to Payment, and 3) Direct Voucher Payment (for limited one-time, non-recurring payments, e.g. a membership or a subscription). Therefore, it is helpful to use both the Supplier Contracts and Supplier Payments reports on SFOpenBook, as well as on DataSF.

The data included in the Supplier Contracts dataset reflects supplier expenditure contracts that were awarded by City Departments after 7/1/2017, the date the City & County of San Francisco implemented the PeopleSoft Financial & Procurement System, as well as the remaining not-to-exceed contract authority for all supplier expenditure contracts that were still active along with their associated purchase order (PO) available, unexpended balances as of 7/1/2017. For partially used contract authority, the Contract Award Amount only includes the portion that was unutilized and available as of 7/1/2017, unless the Contract Award Amount was updated by the department after July 1, 2017. Contracts that were expired before 7/1/2017 as well as contracts that had no remaining contracting authority from which to issue new purchase orders were not converted or loaded into PeopleSoft. For information requests regarding the latter as well as for the portion of contract of authority used prior to 7/1/2017 for otherwise unexpired contract balances that were converted and still active as of 7/1/2017, please contact the City department(s) that issued the contract.

The global contract database management software market is projected to expand from XXX million in 2025 to XXX million by 2033, exhibiting a CAGR of XX% during the forecast period. The surge in data volume, increasing need for efficient contract management, and growing adoption of cloud-based solutions drive the market growth. However, concerns over data security and privacy may hinder the market expansion. Key industry players such as Knowable, Pandaverse, Norton Rose Fulbright, ContractSafe, Contractbook, Contractify, CobbleStone Software, SimpleDocs, ContractPodAi, Casetext, Agiloft, Evisort, SecureDocs, Barhead Solutions, Malbek, SirionLabs, Avvoka, Onit, ContractKen, and Maxime Tools hold significant market shares. The competitive landscape is expected to intensify as companies focus on developing innovative solutions and expanding their global presence. Moreover, the increasing adoption of AI and ML technologies in contract management software is likely to drive market growth in the coming years. The global contract database management software market size was valued at USD 2.96 billion in 2021 and is projected to grow at a CAGR of 13.2% from 2022 to 2030. The growth of this market can be attributed to the increasing need for businesses to manage their contracts effectively, the growing adoption of cloud-based software solutions, and the increasing complexity of contracts.

Open procurement data procurement orders (contracts) that has been done in the government procurement department annually shows all the data of (buyers, bidders, supplies, ...)

The Dataset contains the notices, tenders and tender results in open format collected by the SCP - Public Contracts Service database managed by the General Directorate for regulation and public contracts of the Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport. More information is available on the website www.servizioconratipubblici.it which allows contracting authorities to publish notices and tenders for works, services and supplies and other information. Public Contracts Service is one of the national databases owned by the Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport listed in Annex B of Legislative Decree no. 97/2016 (art. 9) which modifies the publication obligation provided for in the transparency legislation Legislative Decree. Legislative Decree no. 33/2013 (art. 9bis). The data relating to the tenders are also available in Open Contracting Data Standard (OCDS) format The data is updated daily.

Analysis of ‘Supplier Contracts’ provided by Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai), based on source dataset retrieved from https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/534c1caf-36ba-4e3d-a53a-c4a1f872cfe8 on 28 January 2022.

--- Dataset description provided by original source is as follows ---

The San Francisco Controller's Office maintains a database of contracts and payments made to Suppliers (vendors, contractors and grantees). The Supplier Contracts shown here include all fully executed, expenditure-only contracts, including City contracts for commodities, professional and general services, and construction from fiscal year 2018 forward, based upon the contracting departments' inputs. This data set includes both departmental and citywide contracts.

This data is presented on the Supplier Contracts report hosted at http://openbook.sfgov.org, and is also available in CSV format, which lists summary data by contract. We have removed sensitive contracts and information from this data in order to balance disclosure requirements and protected/confidential data. For example, we have removed contracts related to certain legal proceedings that are exempt from disclosure. New data is added on a weekly basis.

Revenue contracts, including concessions and rental income contracts, are not included in this data set; they are tracked in departmental subsystems and currently are not available in SF Open Book. For more information about Revenue Contracts, please contact the respective City Department that awards the contract, e.g. for Airport Concession Contracts, contact the San Francisco Airport Commission which maintains these records.

City Department spending may occur three ways: 1) from Contract to Purchase Order (i.e. a PO with an accounting Encumbrance) to Payment (i.e. an accounting Voucher), AKA On-Contract spending, 2) direct-to-Purchase Order (no contract, only a PO agreement and accounting Encumbrance) to Payment, and 3) Direct Voucher Payment (for limited one-time, non-recurring payments, e.g. a membership or a subscription). Therefore, it is helpful to use both the Supplier Contracts and Supplier Payments reports on SFOpenBook, as well as on DataSF.

--- Original source retains full ownership of the source dataset ---

DISCLAIMER:The information regarding the Assistance and Section 8 contracts, and properties is being furnished for the convenience of interested parties. The information has been compiled from multiple data sources within FHA or its contractors. This information does not purport to be complete or all inclusive. No representation or warranty, express or implied, as to any of the information contained in these files is made by HUD, FHA or any of their respective contractors, representatives or agents, or any officer, Director, employee, or any of the above. INSTRUCTIONS:This database was created to provide HUD partners/clients with a way of measuring the potential impact of expiring project-based subsidy contracts in their communities. It represents the most comprehensive picture of project-based subsidies yet developed, but like any "snap-shot", its usefulness has limits, although, Multifamily plans to refresh this data on a monthly basis. Below, we give a summary of what to keep in mind when viewing the information:Download of the Assistance and Section 8 Contracts - This compressed, (self extracting) file is offered in Microsoft Access Version 7.0 for Windows 95. It is important to note that this is a very large file and the speed for completing the download of the file is dependent on the bandwidth of you Internet Service provider (ISP) and the speed of your connection to the internet. The database contains two tables, one on the contract level, the other on the property level. To see property level data you must link these two tables by the property id field.Contract Expiration Data and Units - Please keep in mind that you will often find more than one contract will share the same property information. The field “assisted_units_count” , in the contract level table counts the number of units funded in that unique contract; the term “property_total_unit_count” shows how many units are in the entire property. A project with 100 units and two 50-units Section 8 contracts would have two records in the contract table and one record in the property table.Rent/Fair Market Rents - For each contract, we display the overall average ratio of gross contract rents to FMR taking into account the number of units and FMR for each bedroom size. Please note that this ratio is a guide only. In addition, since FMRs are determined by county and metro area, errors in project address data may lead to incorrect FMR benchmarks. Lastly, project rents change frequently and are therefore more subject to error. In creating this database, HUD staff processed over 24,000 address records and over 70,000 rent records. While considerable effort was made to assure the accuracy of the data used, absolute certainty is impossible.HUD-Held and HUD-Owned Status - The classification of projects as "HUD-Held" or "HUD-Owned" is based solely on status codes in HUD's accounting systems and has not been independently verified. For the most current status of a particular insured mortgage, contact the local HUD Field Office.Opportunity Zone Indicator - If a property is located in an Opportunity Zone, the field “is_opportunity_zone_ind” will show ‘Y’.