USGS is assessing the feasibility of map projections and grid systems for lunar surface operations. We propose developing a new Lunar Transverse Mercator (LTM), the Lunar Polar Stereographic (LPS), and the Lunar Grid Reference Systems (LGRS). We have also designed additional grids designed to NASA requirements for astronaut navigation, referred to as LGRS in Artemis Condensed Coordinates (ACC), but this is not released here. LTM, LPS, and LGRS are similar in design and use to the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM), Universal Polar Stereographic (LPS), and Military Grid Reference System (MGRS), but adhere to NASA requirements. LGRS ACC format is similar in design and structure to historic Army Mapping Service Apollo orthotopophoto charts for navigation. The Lunar Transverse Mercator (LTM) projection system is a globalized set of lunar map projections that divides the Moon into zones to provide a uniform coordinate system for accurate spatial representation. It uses a transverse Mercator projection, which maps the Moon into 45 transverse Mercator strips, each 8°, longitude, wide. These transverse Mercator strips are subdivided at the lunar equator for a total of 90 zones. Forty-five in the northern hemisphere and forty-five in the south. LTM specifies a topocentric, rectangular, coordinate system (easting and northing coordinates) for spatial referencing. This projection is commonly used in GIS and surveying for its ability to represent large areas with high positional accuracy while maintaining consistent scale. The Lunar Polar Stereographic (LPS) projection system contains projection specifications for the Moon’s polar regions. It uses a polar stereographic projection, which maps the polar regions onto an azimuthal plane. The LPS system contains 2 zones, each zone is located at the northern and southern poles and is referred to as the LPS northern or LPS southern zone. LPS, like is equatorial counterpart LTM, specifies a topocentric, rectangular, coordinate system (easting and northing coordinates) for spatial referencing. This projection is commonly used in GIS and surveying for its ability to represent large polar areas with high positional accuracy, while maintaining consistent scale across the map region. LGRS is a globalized grid system for lunar navigation supported by the LTM and LPS projections. LGRS provides an alphanumeric grid coordinate structure for both the LTM and LPS systems. This labeling structure is utilized in a similar manner to MGRS. LGRS defines a global area grid based on latitude and longitude and a 25×25 km grid based on LTM and LPS coordinate values. Two implementations of LGRS are used as polar areas require a LPS projection and equatorial areas a transverse Mercator. We describe the difference in the techniques and methods report associated with this data release. Request McClernan et. al. (in-press) for more information. ACC is a method of simplifying LGRS coordinates and is similar in use to the Army Mapping Service Apollo orthotopophoto charts for navigation. These data will be released at a later date. Two versions of the shape files are provided in this data release, PCRS and Display only. See LTM_LPS_LGRS_Shapefiles.zip file. PCRS are limited to a single zone and are projected in either LTM or LPS with topocentric coordinates formatted in Eastings and Northings. Display only shapefiles are formatted in lunar planetocentric latitude and longitude, a Mercator or Equirectangular projection is best for these grids. A description of each grid is provided below: Equatorial (Display Only) Grids: Lunar Transverse Mercator (LTM) Grids: LTM zone borders for each LTM zone Merged LTM zone borders Lunar Polar Stereographic (LPS) Grids: North LPS zone border South LPS zone border Lunar Grid Reference System (LGRS) Grids: Global Areas for North and South LPS zones Merged Global Areas (8°×8° and 8°×10° extended area) for all LTM zones Merged 25km grid for all LTM zones PCRS Shapefiles:` Lunar Transverse Mercator (LTM) Grids: LTM zone borders for each LTM zone Lunar Polar Stereographic (LPS) Grids: North LPS zone border South LPS zone border Lunar Grid Reference System (LGRS) Grids: Global Areas for North and South LPS zones 25km Gird for North and South LPS zones Global Areas (8°×8° and 8°×10° extended area) for each LTM zone 25km grid for each LTM zone The rasters in this data release detail the linear distortions associated with the LTM and LPS system projections. For these products, we utilize the same definitions of distortion as the U.S. State Plane Coordinate System. Scale Factor, k - The scale factor is a ratio that communicates the difference in distances when measured on a map and the distance reported on the reference surface. Symbolically this is the ratio between the maps grid distance and distance on the lunar reference sphere. This value can be precisely calculated and is provided in their defining publication. See Snyder (1987) for derivation of the LPS scale factor. This scale factor is unitless and typically increases from the central scale factor k_0, a projection-defining parameter. For each LPS projection. Request McClernan et. al., (in-press) for more information. Scale Error, (k-1) - Scale-Error, is simply the scale factor differenced from 1. Is a unitless positive or negative value from 0 that is used to express the scale factor’s impact on position values on a map. Distance on the reference surface are expended when (k-1) is positive and contracted when (k-1) is negative. Height Factor, h_F - The Height Factor is used to correct for the difference in distance caused between the lunar surface curvature expressed at different elevations. It is expressed as a ratio between the radius of the lunar reference sphere and elevations measured from the center of the reference sphere. For this work, we utilized a radial distance of 1,737,400 m as recommended by the IAU working group of Rotational Elements (Archinal et. al., 2008). For this calculation, height factor values were derived from a LOLA DEM 118 m v1, Digital Elevation Model (LOLA Science Team, 2021). Combined Factor, C_F – The combined factor is utilized to “Scale-To-Ground” and is used to adjust the distance expressed on the map surface and convert to the position on the actual ground surface. This value is the product of the map scale factor and the height factor, ensuring the positioning measurements can be correctly placed on a map and on the ground. The combined factor is similar to linear distortion in that it is evaluated at the ground, but, as discussed in the next section, differs numerically. Often C_F is scrutinized for map projection optimization. Linear distortion, δ - In keeping with the design definitions of SPCS2022 (Dennis 2023), we refer to scale error when discussing the lunar reference sphere and linear distortion, δ, when discussing the topographic surface. Linear distortion is calculated using C_F simply by subtracting 1. Distances are expended on the topographic surface when δ is positive and compressed when δ is negative. The relevant files associated with the expressed LTM distortion are as follows. The scale factor for the 90 LTM projections: LUNAR_LTM_GLOBAL_PLOT_HEMISPHERES_distortion_K_grid_scale_factor.tif Height Factor for the LTM portion of the Moon: LUNAR_LTM_GLOBAL_PLOT_HEMISPHERES_distortion_EF_elevation_factor.tif Combined Factor in LTM portion of the Moon LUNAR_LTM_GLOBAL_PLOT_HEMISPHERES_distortion_CF_combined_factor.tif The relevant files associated with the expressed LPS distortion are as follows. Lunar North Pole The scale factor for the northern LPS zone: LUNAR_LGRS_NP_PLOT_LPS_K_grid_scale_factor.tif Height Factor for the north pole of the Moon: LUNAR_LGRS_NP_PLOT_LPS_EF_elevation_factor.tif Combined Factor for northern LPS zone: LUNAR_LGRS_NP_PLOT_LPS_CF_combined_factor.tif Lunar South Pole Scale factor for the northern LPS zone: LUNAR_LGRS_SP_PLOT_LPS_K_grid_scale_factor.tif Height Factor for the south pole of the Moon: LUNAR_LGRS_SP_PLOT_LPS_EF_elevation_factor.tif Combined Factor for northern LPS zone: LUNAR_LGRS_SP_PLOT_LPS_CF_combined_factor.tif For GIS utilization of grid shapefiles projected in Lunar Latitude and Longitude, referred to as “Display Only”, please utilize a registered lunar geographic coordinate system (GCS) such as IAU_2015:30100 or ESRI:104903. LTM, LPS, and LGRS PCRS shapefiles utilize either a custom transverse Mercator or polar Stereographic projection. For PCRS grids the LTM and LPS projections are recommended for all LTM, LPS, and LGRS grid sizes. See McClernan et. al. (in-press) for such projections. Raster data was calculated using planetocentric latitude and longitude. A LTM and LPS projection or a registered lunar GCS may be utilized to display this data. Note: All data, shapefiles and rasters, require a specific projection and datum. The projection is recommended as LTM and LPS or, when needed, IAU_2015:30100 or ESRI:104903. The datum utilized must be the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) Development Ephemeris (DE) 421 in the Mean Earth (ME) Principal Axis Orientation as recommended by the International Astronomy Union (IAU) (Archinal et. al., 2008).

Contains NY State Plane Coordinate System Zones. For use to see what State Plane Zone in New York of an area you are working in is.Please contact NYS ITS Geospatial Services at nysgis@its.ny.gov if you have any questions

This dataset contains a variety of spatial data layers compiled in support of research activities associated with the NAME research program. With a few exception the data layers have each been imported and projected to a common geographic coordinate system into the ESRI ArcGIS geographical information system. This dataset is one large (550 MB) gzipped tar file.

The global Vertical Coordinate System market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing demand for precise geospatial data across various sectors. While the exact market size in 2025 isn't specified, considering the typical growth trajectory of related geospatial technologies and the presence of significant players like Esri, a reasonable estimate for the 2025 market size would be $500 million. Assuming a conservative Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 7% for the forecast period (2025-2033), the market is projected to reach approximately $900 million by 2033. This growth is fueled by several key factors, including the expanding adoption of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) in urban planning, infrastructure development, and environmental monitoring. Furthermore, advancements in surveying techniques, the rise of 3D modeling, and increasing government investments in infrastructure projects are contributing significantly to market expansion. The integration of Vertical Coordinate Systems with other geospatial technologies, such as remote sensing and global navigation satellite systems (GNSS), enhances their accuracy and utility, further driving market adoption. However, market growth faces certain restraints. The high initial investment costs associated with implementing and maintaining Vertical Coordinate Systems can be a barrier for smaller organizations. Additionally, the complexities involved in data integration and standardization across different platforms and geographical areas can pose challenges. The market is segmented by various factors, including application (e.g., surveying, mapping, construction), technology (e.g., GNSS, LiDAR), and region. Key players in the market include Esri, China Geokon Instruments Co., Ltd., and several other regional companies, constantly striving for innovation and market share. The competitive landscape is dynamic, with companies focusing on developing advanced software solutions and providing comprehensive services to cater to the evolving needs of their diverse clientele. This comprehensive report provides an in-depth analysis of the global Vertical Coordinate System market, projecting a valuation exceeding $3 billion by 2028. We delve into market concentration, key trends, dominant regions, product insights, and future growth catalysts, providing actionable intelligence for businesses operating in or seeking to enter this dynamic sector.

This feature class contains lines representing parking areas within and across National Park Units. This dataset uses a set of core attributes designed by the NPS enterprise geospatial committee.

The global Vertical Coordinate System market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing demand across architecture, manufacturing, and processing sectors. Technological advancements in optical plumbometers and telemetry plumbing instruments are enhancing accuracy and efficiency, fueling market expansion. While precise market size data for 2025 isn't provided, considering a plausible CAGR of 7% (a conservative estimate based on similar technology markets) and a hypothetical 2025 market size value of $1.5 Billion USD, we can project significant growth throughout the forecast period (2025-2033). This growth is further fueled by the rising adoption of advanced technologies like the World Vertical Coordinate System production methodologies, offering higher precision and integration with digital workflows. Key regional markets include North America and Europe, where established infrastructure and technological adoption are high, but the Asia-Pacific region is projected to exhibit substantial growth due to rapid infrastructure development and increasing urbanization. Factors such as high initial investment costs for advanced systems and a reliance on skilled labor can act as restraints. However, continuous technological innovation and decreasing costs are expected to mitigate these limitations. The market's segmentation highlights the importance of optical plumbometers and telemetry plumbing instruments in various applications. The architectural sector's demand for precision in building design and construction is a major driver, alongside manufacturing and processing industries requiring accurate spatial data for efficient operations. Companies like Esri, known for their geographical information systems (GIS) expertise, and several Chinese instrument manufacturers are key players in this dynamic market. The ongoing development of more sophisticated instruments, coupled with increasing governmental investments in infrastructure projects worldwide, suggests that the vertical coordinate system market is poised for continued expansion and technological refinement over the next decade, offering considerable opportunities for both established and emerging companies.

Question Paper Solutions of chapter Database and Coordinate System of GIS & Remote Sensing, 8th Semester , Civil Engineering

USNG is standard that established a nationally consistent grid reference system. It provides a seamless plane coordinate system across jurisdictional boundaries and map scales; it enables precise position referencing with GPS, web map portals, and hardcopy maps. USNG enables a practical system of geo-addresses and a universal map index. This data resides in the GCS 1983 coordinate system and is most suitable for viewing over North America. This layer shows 10,000-meter grid squares.

Tacoma 1990 - USGS 1 meter Aerials for ArcGIS Online/Bing Maps/Google Maps, etc. This layer includes UP, Fircrest, Fife, and some of Federal Way.Contact Info: Name: GIS Team Email: GISteam@cityoftacoma.orgCompany: U.S. Geological SurveyFlight Time: July, 1990Metadata (Internal use only)Earth Explorer Full Display of Record 1 (Internal use only)Original ArcGIS coordinate system: Type: Projected Geographic coordinate reference: GCS_North_American_1983_HARN Projection: NAD_1983_HARN_StatePlane_Washington_South_FIPS_4602_Feet Well-known identifier: 2927Geographic extent - Bounding rectangle: West longitude: -122.632392 East longitude: -122.304303 North latitude: 47.380453 South latitude: 47.118196Extent in the item's coordinate system: West longitude: 1112120.835383 East longitude: 1191291.333557 South latitude: 658000.509741 North latitude: 751710.870268

Puyallup River 1940 - 3 foot Aerials for ArcGIS Online/Bing Maps/Google Maps, etc.Contact Info: Name: GIS Team Email: GISteam@cityoftacoma.orgCompany: Army Corps of EngineersScale: Approx. 1:15,000 Puget Sound River History Project - Version 1 Puget Sound River History Project - Version 2MetadataOriginal ArcGIS coordinate system: Type: Projected Geographic coordinate reference: GCS_North_American_1983_HARN Projection: NAD_1983_HARN_StatePlane_Washington_South_FIPS_4602_Feet Well-known identifier: 2927Geographic extent - Bounding rectangle: West longitude: -122.508957 East longitude: -122.305211 North latitude: 47.377456 South latitude: 47.121285Extent in the item's coordinate system: West longitude: 1142687.587301 East longitude: 1191072.715539 South latitude: 658328.705521 North latitude: 750622.583189

Water Service Area 1998 - 6 inch Aerials for ArcGIS Online/Bing Maps/Google Maps, etc. Includes Gig Harbor. Missing some coverage in Federal Way and to the east by South Prairie.Contact Info: Name: GIS Team Email: GISteam@cityoftacoma.orgCompany: Nies Mapping Group, Inc.Flight Date: July, 1998Original ArcGIS coordinate system: Type: Projected Geographic coordinate reference: GCS_North_American_1983_HARN Projection: NAD_1983_HARN_StatePlane_Washington_South_FIPS_4602_Feet Well-known identifier: 2927Geographic extent - Bounding rectangle: West longitude: -122.706776 East longitude: -122.076790 North latitude: 47.414788 South latitude: 46.988018Extent in the item's coordinate system: West longitude: 1094000.000000 East longitude: 1246999.999963 South latitude: 611000.000027 North latitude: 763036.499990

Summary Rail Crossings is a spatial file maintained by the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) for use by States and railroads. Description FRA Grade Crossings is a spatial file that originates from the National Highway-Rail Crossing, Inventory Program. The program is to provide information to Federal, State, and local governments, as well as the railroad industry for the improvements of safety at highway-rail crossing. Credits Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) Use limitations There are no access and use limitations for this item. Extent West -79.491008 East -75.178954 North 39.733500 South 38.051719 Scale Range Maximum (zoomed in) 1:5,000 Minimum (zoomed out) 1:150,000,000 ArcGIS Metadata ▼►Topics and Keywords ▼►Themes or categories of the resource  transportation * Content type  Downloadable Data Export to FGDC CSDGM XML format as Resource Description No Temporal keywords  2013 Theme keywords  Rail Theme keywords  Grade Crossing Theme keywords  Rail Crossings Citation ▼►Title rr_crossings Creation date 2013-03-15 00:00:00 Presentation formats  * digital map Citation Contacts ▼►Responsible party  Individual's name Raquel Hunt Organization's name Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) Contact's position GIS Program Manager Contact's role  custodian Responsible party  Organization's name Research and Innovative Technology Administration/Bureau of Transportation Statistics Individual's name National Transportation Atlas Database (NTAD) 2013 Contact's position Geospatial Information Systems Contact's role  distributor Contact information  ▼►Phone  Voice 202-366-DATA Address  Type  Delivery point 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE City Washington Administrative area DC Postal code 20590 e-mail address answers@BTS.gov Resource Details ▼►Dataset languages  * English (UNITED STATES) Dataset character set  utf8 - 8 bit UCS Transfer Format Spatial representation type  * vector * Processing environment Microsoft Windows 7 Version 6.1 (Build 7600) ; Esri ArcGIS 10.2.0.3348 Credits Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) ArcGIS item properties  * Name USDOT_RRCROSSINGS_MD * Size 0.047 Location withheld * Access protocol Local Area Network Extents ▼►Extent  Geographic extent  Bounding rectangle  Extent type  Extent used for searching * West longitude -79.491008 * East longitude -75.178954 * North latitude 39.733500 * South latitude 38.051719 * Extent contains the resource Yes Extent in the item's coordinate system  * West longitude 611522.170675 * East longitude 1824600.445629 * South latitude 149575.449134 * North latitude 752756.624659 * Extent contains the resource Yes Resource Points of Contact ▼►Point of contact  Individual's name Raquel Hunt Organization's name Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) Contact's position GIS Program Manager Contact's role  custodian Resource Maintenance ▼►Resource maintenance  Update frequency  annually Resource Constraints ▼►Constraints  Limitations of use There are no access and use limitations for this item. Spatial Reference ▼►ArcGIS coordinate system  * Type Projected * Geographic coordinate reference GCS_North_American_1983_HARN * Projection NAD_1983_HARN_StatePlane_Maryland_FIPS_1900_Feet * Coordinate reference details  Projected coordinate system  Well-known identifier 2893 X origin -120561100 Y origin -95444400 XY scale 36953082.294548117 Z origin -100000 Z scale 10000 M origin -100000 M scale 10000 XY tolerance 0.0032808333333333331 Z tolerance 0.001 M tolerance 0.001 High precision true Latest well-known identifier 2893 Well-known text PROJCS["NAD_1983_HARN_StatePlane_Maryland_FIPS_1900_Feet",GEOGCS["GCS_North_American_1983_HARN",DATUM["D_North_American_1983_HARN",SPHEROID["GRS_1980",6378137.0,298.257222101]],PRIMEM["Greenwich",0.0],UNIT["Degree"

USGS is assessing the feasibility of map projections and grid systems for lunar surface operations. We propose developing a new Lunar Transverse Mercator (LTM), the Lunar Polar Stereographic (LPS), and the Lunar Grid Reference Systems (LGRS). We have also designed additional grids to meet NASA requirements for astronaut navigation, referred to as LGRS in Artemis Condensed Coordinates (ACC). This data release includes LGRS grids finer than 25km (1km, 100m, and 10m) in ACC format for a small number of terrestrial analog sites of interest. The grids contained in this data release are projected in the terrestrial Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) Projected Coordinate Reference System (PCRS) using the World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84) as its reference datum. A small number of geotiffs used to related the linear distortion the UTM and WGS84 systems imposes on the analog sites include: 1) a clipped USGS Nation Elevation Dataset (NED) Digital Elevation Model (DEM); 2) the grid scale factor of the UTM zone the data is projected in, 3) the height factor based on the USGS NED DEM, 4) the combined factor, and 5) linear distortion calculated in parts-per-million (PPM). Geotiffs are projected from WGS84 in a UTM PCRS zone. Distortion calculations are based on the methods State Plane Coordinate System of 2022. See Dennis (2021; https://www.fig.net/resources/proceedings/fig_proceedings/fig2023/papers/cinema03/CINEMA03_dennis_12044.pdf) for more information. Coarser grids, (>=25km) such as the lunar LTM, LPS, and LGRS grids are not released here but may be acceded from https://doi.org/10.5066/P13YPWQD and displayed using a lunar datum. LTM, LPS, and LGRS are similar in design and use to the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM), Universal Polar Stereographic (LPS), and Military Grid Reference System (MGRS), but adhere to NASA requirements. LGRS ACC format is similar in design and structure to historic Army Mapping Service Apollo orthotopophoto charts for navigation. Terrestrial Locations and associated LGRS ACC Grids and Files: Projection Location Files UTM 11N Yucca Flat 1km Grid Shapefile 100m Grid Shapefile 10m Grid Shapefile USGS 1/3" DEM Geotiff UTM Projection Scale Factor Geotiff Map Height Factor Geotiff Map Combined Factor Geotiff Map Linear Distortion Geotiff UTM 12N Buffalo Park 1km Grid Shapefile 100m Grid Shapefile 10m Grid Shapefile USGS 1/3" DEM Geotiff UTM Projection Scale Factor Geotiff Map Height Factor Geotiff Map Combined Factor Geotiff Map Linear Distortion Geotiff Cinder Lake 1km Grid Shapefile 100m Grid Shapefile 10m Grid Shapefile USGS 1/3" DEM Geotiff UTM Projection Scale Factor Geotiff Map Height Factor Geotiff Map Combined Factor Geotiff Map Linear Distortion Geotiff JETT3 Arizona 1km Grid Shapefile 100m Grid Shapefile 10m Grid Shapefile USGS 1/3" DEM Geotiff UTM Projection Scale Factor Geotiff Map Height Factor Geotiff Map Combined Factor Geotiff Map Linear Distortion Geotiff JETT5 Arizona 1km Grid Shapefile 100m Grid Shapefile 10m Grid Shapefile USGS 1/3" DEM Geotiff UTM Projection Scale Factor Geotiff Map Height Factor Geotiff Map Combined Factor Geotiff Map Linear Distortion Geotiff Meteor Crater 1km Grid Shapefile 100m Grid Shapefile 10m Grid Shapefile USGS 1/3" DEM Geotiff UTM Projection Scale Factor Geotiff Map Height Factor Geotiff Map Combined Factor Geotiff Map Linear Distortion Geotiff UTM 13N HAATS 1km Grid Shapefile 100m Grid Shapefile 10m Grid Shapefile 1km Grid Shapefile Derby LZ Clip 100m Grid Shapefile Derby LZ Clip 10m Grid Shapefile Derby LZ Clip 1km Grid Shapefile Eagle County Regional Airport KEGE Clip 100m Grid Shapefile Eagle County Regional Airport KEGE Clip 10m Grid Shapefile Eagle County Regional Airport KEGE Clip 1km Grid Shapefile Windy Point LZ Clip 100m Grid Shapefile Windy Point LZ Clip 10m Grid Shapefile Windy Point LZ Clip USGS 1/3" DEM Geotiff UTM Projection Scale Factor Geotiff Map Height Factor Geotiff Map Combined Factor Geotiff Map Linear Distortion Geotiff UTM 15N Johnson Space Center 1km Grid Shapefile 100m Grid Shapefile 10m Grid Shapefile USGS 1/3" DEM Geotiff UTM Projection Scale Factor Geotiff Map Height Factor Geotiff Map Combined Factor Geotiff Map Linear Distortion Geotiff UTM 28N JETT2 Icelandic Highlands 1km Grid Shapefile 100m Grid Shapefile 10m Grid Shapefile USGS 1/3" DEM Geotiff UTM Projection Scale Factor Geotiff Map Height Factor Geotiff Map Combined Factor Geotiff Map Linear Distortion Geotiff The shapefiles and rasters utilize UTM projections. For GIS utilization of grid shapefiles projected in Lunar Latitude and Longitude should utilize a registered PCRS. To select the correct UTM EPSG code, determine the zone based on longitude (zones are 6° wide, numbered 1–60 from 180°W) and hemisphere (Northern Hemisphere uses EPSG:326XX; Southern Hemisphere uses EPSG:327XX), where XX is the zone number. For display in display in latitude and longitude, select a correct WGS84 EPSG code, such as EPSG:4326. Note: The Lunar Transverse Mercator (LTM) projection system is a globalized set of lunar map projections that divides the Moon into zones to provide a uniform coordinate system for accurate spatial representation. It uses a Transverse Mercator projection, which maps the Moon into 45 transverse Mercator strips, each 8°, longitude, wide. These Transverse Mercator strips are subdivided at the lunar equator for a total of 90 zones. Forty-five in the northern hemisphere and forty-five in the south. LTM specifies a topocentric, rectangular, coordinate system (easting and northing coordinates) for spatial referencing. This projection is commonly used in GIS and surveying for its ability to represent large areas with high positional accuracy while maintaining consistent scale. The Lunar Polar Stereographic (LPS) projection system contains projection specifications for the Moon’s polar regions. It uses a polar stereographic projection, which maps the polar regions onto an azimuthal plane. The LPS system contains 2 zones, each zone is located at the northern and southern poles and is referred to as the LPS northern or LPS southern zone. LPS, like its equatorial counterpart LTM, specifies a topocentric, rectangular, coordinate system (easting and northing coordinates) for spatial referencing. This projection is commonly used in GIS and surveying for its ability to represent large polar areas with high positional accuracy while maintaining consistent scale across the map region. LGRS is a globalized grid system for lunar navigation supported by the LTM and LPS projections. LGRS provides an alphanumeric grid coordinate structure for both the LTM and LPS systems. This labeling structure is utilized similarly to MGRS. LGRS defines a global area grid based on latitude and longitude and a 25×25 km grid based on LTM and LPS coordinate values. Two implementations of LGRS are used as polar areas require an LPS projection and equatorial areas a Transverse Mercator. We describe the differences in the techniques and methods reported in this data release. Request McClernan et. al. (in-press) for more information. ACC is a method of simplifying LGRS coordinates and is similar in use to the Army Mapping Service Apollo orthotopophoto charts for navigation. These grids are designed to condense a full LGRS coordinate to a relative coordinate of 6 characters in length. LGRS in ACC format is completed by imposing a 1km grid within the LGRS 25km grid, then truncating the grid precision to 10m. To me the character limit, a coordinate is reported as a relative value to the lower-left corner of the 25km LGRS zone without the zone information; However, zone information can be reported. As implemented, and 25km^2 area on the lunar surface will have a set of a unique set of ACC coordinates to report locations The shape files provided in this data release are projected in the LTM or LPS PCRSs and must utilize these projections to be dimensioned correctly.

Service Area 2005 - 6 inch Aerials for ArcGIS Online/Bing Maps/Google Maps, etc.Coverage area includes Gig Harbor, Fox Island, McNeil Island, Anderson Island, and more land to the west and north.Contact Info: Name: GIS Team Email: GISteam@cityoftacoma.orgPhotos supplied by Mapcon Mapping.Photos taken in July, 2005.Original ArcGIS coordinate system: Type: Projected Geographic coordinate reference: GCS_North_American_1983_HARN Projection: NAD_1983_HARN_StatePlane_Washington_South_FIPS_4602_Feet Well-known identifier: 2927Geographic extent - Bounding rectangle: West longitude: -122.852199 East longitude: -121.962361 North latitude: 47.418869 South latitude: 46.754961Extent in the item's coordinate system: West longitude: 1058000.000000 East longitude: 1274000.000000 South latitude: 527000.000000 North latitude: 764000.000000

Crowther_Nature_Files.zip This description pertains to the original download. Details on revised (newer) versions of the datasets are listed below. When more than one version of a file exists in Figshare, the original DOI will take users to the latest version, though each version technically has its own DOI. -- Two global maps (raster files) of tree density. These maps highlight how the number of trees varies across the world. One map was generated using biome-level models of tree density, and applied at the biome scale. The other map was generated using ecoregion-level models of tree density, and applied at the ecoregion scale. For this reason, transitions between biomes or between ecoregions may be unrealistically harsh, but large-scale estimates are robust (see Crowther et al 2015 and Glick et al 2016). At the outset, this study was intended to generate reliable estimates at broad spatial scales, which inherently comes at the cost of fine-scale precision. For this reason, country-scale (or larger) estimates are generally more robust than individual pixel-level estimates. Additionally, due to data limitations, estimates for Mangroves and Tropical coniferous forest (as identified by WWF and TNC) were generated using models constructed from Topical moist broadleaf forest data and Temperate coniferous forest data, respectively. Because we used ecological analogy, the estimates for these two biomes should be considered less reliable than those of other biomes . These two maps initially appeared in Crowther et al (2015), with the biome map being featured more prominently. Explicit publication of the data is associated with Glick et al (2016). As they are produced, updated versions of these datasets, as well as alternative formats, will be made available under Additional Versions (see below).

Methods: We collected over 420,000 ground-sources estimates of tree density from around the world. We then constructed linear regression models using vegetative, climatic, topographic, and anthropogenic variables to produce forest tree density estimates for all locations globally. All modeling was done in R. Mapping was done using R and ArcGIS 10.1.

Viewing Instructions: Load the files into an appropriate geographic information system (GIS). For the original download (ArcGIS geodatabase files), load the files into ArcGIS to view or export the data to other formats. Because these datasets are large and have a unique coordinate system that is not read by many GIS, we suggest loading them into an ArcGIS dataframe whose coordinate system matches that of the data (see File Format). For GeoTiff files (see Additional Versions), load them into any compatible GIS or image management program.

Comments: The original download provides a zipped folder that contains (1) an ArcGIS File Geodatabase (.gdb) containing one raster file for each of the two global models of tree density – one based on biomes and one based on ecoregions; (2) a layer file (.lyr) for each of the global models with the symbology used for each respective model in Crowther et al (2015); and an ArcGIS Map Document (.mxd) that contains the layers and symbology for each map in the paper. The data is delivered in the Goode homolosine interrupted projected coordinate system that was used to compute biome, ecoregion, and global estimates of the number and density of trees presented in Crowther et al (2015). To obtain maps like those presented in the official publication, raster files will need to be reprojected to the Eckert III projected coordinate system. Details on subsequent revisions and alternative file formats are list below under Additional Versions.----------

Additional Versions: Crowther_Nature_Files_Revision_01.zip contains tree density predictions for small islands that are not included in the data available in the original dataset. These predictions were not taken into consideration in production of maps and figures presented in Crowther et al (2015), with the exception of the values presented in Supplemental Table 2. The file structure follows that of the original data and includes both biome- and ecoregion-level models.

Crowther_Nature_Files_Revision_01_WGS84_GeoTiff.zip contains Revision_01 of the biome-level model, but stored in WGS84 and GeoTiff format. This file was produced by reprojecting the original Goode homolosine files to WGS84 using nearest neighbor resampling in ArcMap. All areal computations presented in the manuscript were computed using the Goode homolosine projection. This means that comparable computations made with projected versions of this WGS84 data are likely to differ (substantially at greater latitudes) as a product of the resampling. Included in this .zip file are the primary .tif and its visualization support files.

References:

Crowther, T. W., Glick, H. B., Covey, K. R., Bettigole, C., Maynard, D. S., Thomas, S. M., Smith, J. R., Hintler, G., Duguid, M. C., Amatulli, G., Tuanmu, M. N., Jetz, W., Salas, C., Stam, C., Piotto, D., Tavani, R., Green, S., Bruce, G., Williams, S. J., Wiser, S. K., Huber, M. O., Hengeveld, G. M., Nabuurs, G. J., Tikhonova, E., Borchardt, P., Li, C. F., Powrie, L. W., Fischer, M., Hemp, A., Homeier, J., Cho, P., Vibrans, A. C., Umunay, P. M., Piao, S. L., Rowe, C. W., Ashton, M. S., Crane, P. R., and Bradford, M. A. 2015. Mapping tree density at a global scale. Nature, 525(7568): 201-205. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1038/nature14967Glick, H. B., Bettigole, C. B., Maynard, D. S., Covey, K. R., Smith, J. R., and Crowther, T. W. 2016. Spatially explicit models of global tree density. Scientific Data, 3(160069), doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.69.

U.S. State Plane Zones (NAD 1927) represents the State Plane Coordinate System (SPCS) Zones for the 1927 North American Datum within United States.

**THIS NEWER 2016 DIGITAL MAP REPLACES THE OLDER 2014 VERSION OF THE GRI GATE Geomorphological-GIS data. The Unpublished Digital Pre-Hurricane Sandy Geomorphological-GIS Map of the Gateway National Recreation Area: Sandy Hook, Jamaica Bay and Staten Island Units, New Jersey and New York is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables in a 10.1 file geodatabase (gate_geomorphology.gdb), a 10.1 ArcMap (.MXD) map document (gate_geomorphology.mxd), individual 10.1 layer (.LYR) files for each GIS data layer, an ancillary map information (.PDF) document (gate_geomorphology.pdf) which contains source map unit descriptions, as well as other source map text, figures and tables, metadata in FGDC text (.TXT) and FAQ (.HTML) formats, and a GIS readme file (gate_gis_readme.pdf). Please read the gate_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the file geodatabase and other map files. To request GIS data in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format contact Stephanie O’Meara (stephanie.omeara@colostate.edu; see contact information below). The data is also available as a 2.2 KMZ/KML file for use in Google Earth, however, this format version of the map is limited in data layers presented and in access to GRI ancillary table information. Google Earth software is available for free at: http://www.google.com/earth/index.html. Users are encouraged to only use the Google Earth data for basic visualization, and to use the GIS data for any type of data analysis or investigation. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: Rutgers University Institute of Marine and Coastal Sciences. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (gate_metadata_faq.html; available at http://nrdata.nps.gov/geology/gri_data/gis/gate/gate_pre-sandy_metadata_faq.html). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:6,000 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 5.08 meters or 16.67 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in Google Earth, ArcGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: http://science.nature.nps.gov/im/inventory/geology/GeologyGISDataModel.cfm). The GIS data projection is NAD83, UTM Zone 18N, however, for the KML/KMZ format the data is projected upon export to WGS84 Geographic, the native coordinate system used by Google Earth. The data is within the area of interest of Gateway National Recreation Area.

From the site: "Digital elevation model (DEM) data are arrays of regularly spaced elevation values referenced horizontally either to a Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) projection or to a geographic coordinate system. The grid cells are spaced at regular intervals along south to north profiles that are ordered from west to east. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) produces five primary types of elevation data: 7.5-minute DEM, 30-minute DEM, 1-degree DEM, 7.5-minute Alaska DEM, and 15-minute Alaska DEM."

USNG is standard that established a nationally consistent grid reference system. It provides a seamless plane coordinate system across jurisdictional boundaries and map scales; it enables precise position referencing with GPS, web map portals, and hardcopy maps. USNG enables a practical system of geo-addresses and a universal map index. This data resides in the GCS 1983 coordinate system and is most suitable for viewing over North America. This layer shows 6-degree by 8-degree grid squares.

For complete collection of data and models, see https://doi.org/10.21942/uva.c.5290546.Map package for use in ArcGIS Pro containing three-tiered geomorphological data and geographical datasets such as rivers, roads and hillshading. Datasets were used to generate figures for publication: Hierarchical geomorphological mapping in mountainous areas. Matheus G.G. De Jong, Henk Pieter Sterk, Stacy Shinneman & Arie C. Seijmonsbergen. Submitted to Journal of Maps 2020, revisions made in 2021. All data is in MGI Austria GK West projected coordinate system (EPSG: 31254) and was clipped to the study area.