In 2024, the average value of U.S. farm real estate was 4,170 U.S. dollars per acre. Compared to one decade earlier, the value has increased by almost 40 percent. Generally, the value of U.S. farm real estate has had an upward trend since 1970. U.S. farms The number of farms in the United States has conversely been decreasing each year, reaching about two million farms as of 2022. That year, Texas had the most farms out of any other U.S. state by far, with about 246,000 farms. Missouri and Iowa had the second and third most farms, though neither state exceeded 100,000 farms. Agricultural trade Agricultural products encompass any products from agricultural origin that are meant for human consumption or animal feed. Agricultural products can include livestock products or crops. In 2022, the U.S. exported about 196.4 billion U.S. dollars’ worth of agricultural goods worldwide, increasing from the previous several years. Mexico is a key destination for U.S. agricultural products and imported just over 28 billion dollars’ worth in 2022, more than Europe and Eurasia combined.
Value of farmland and buildings per acre, for Canada and the provinces at July 1 (in dollars).
The value per acre of farmland and buildings in Quebec increased by 875 dollars (+9.63 percent) in 2023. Therefore, the value per acre in Quebec reached a peak in 2023 with 9,964 dollars. Notably, the value per acre continuously increased over the last years.Find more key insights for the value per acre of farmland and buildings in countries and regions like value per acre of farmland and buildings (British Columbia), value per acre of farmland and buildings (Saskatchewan), and value per acre of farmland and buildings (Prince Edward Island).
Between 1997 and 2016 prices raised steadily from around 3,030 euros to 6,040 euros before decreasing slightly and stagnating for a few years. After an increase in 2020, land price went down in 2021 to its lowest price per hectare since 2016.
In 2023, the value per acre of farmland and buildings in British Columbia remained nearly unchanged at around 10,056 dollars. Nevertheless, 2023 still represents a peak in the value per acre in British Columbia. Find more key insights for the value per acre of farmland and buildings in countries and regions like value per acre of farmland and buildings (New Brunswick), value per acre of farmland and buildings (Prince Edward Island), and value per acre of farmland and buildings (Alberta).
This statistic shows the price of agricultural land (in euros per hectare) in France and by department between 2019 and 2021. During that period, land in the Bouches-du-Rhône department was the most expensive in the country. The region of Jura is where agricultural land costs the least in France in 2021.
https://www.ycharts.com/termshttps://www.ycharts.com/terms
View yearly updates and historical trends for Iowa Farmland Value. Source: Iowa State University. Track economic data with YCharts analytics.
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
In 2019, Arable Land Price in North Holland (Netherlands) grew 11.2% compared to a year earlier.
The value per acre of farmland and buildings in Canada increased by *** dollars (+**** percent) in 2023. Therefore, the value per acre in Canada reached a peak in 2023 with ***** dollars. Notably, the value per acre continuously increased over the last years.Find more key insights for the value per acre of farmland and buildings in countries and regions like value per acre of farmland and buildings (Nova Scotia), value per acre of farmland and buildings (Prince Edward Island), and value per acre of farmland and buildings (Quebec).
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The agricultural land prices and rents methodology intends to collect comparable statistics on the prices and rents of agricultural land for agricultural use in the European Union, as land is a primary resource for agricultural production. The EU enlargements increased the need for data on agricultural land prices and rents. The main uses of these statistics are comparisons among the Member States and their regions and analyses of the trends in agricultural land prices and rents.
Land prices |
Land rents |
The agricultural land price statistics provide the price of one hectare of free agricultural land during the reference period (a calendar year). Depending on the Member State, these prices can be collected from the owner of agricultural land who is selling agricultural land for agricultural use (selling prices) or from the physical person/legal person/legal entity who is purchasing agricultural land for agricultural use (purchase prices). | The agricultural land rent represents the price of renting one hectare of agricultural land during the reference period (a calendar year). The renting price should be collected from the agricultural holdings renting the land for agricultural use (renting price paid). |
In 2023, the value per acre of farmland and buildings in Alberta increased by 233 dollars (+6.67 percent) compared to 2022. With 3,728 dollars, the value per acre thereby reached its highest value in the observed period. Notably, the value per acre continuously increased over the last years.Find more key insights for the value per acre of farmland and buildings in countries and regions like value per acre of farmland and buildings (New Brunswick), value per acre of farmland and buildings (Nova Scotia), and value per acre of farmland and buildings (Ontario).
This statistic shows the average price per acre of farmland in England and Wales in the first and second half of 2017, by type. During this time period the cost of pasture land has fallen from over *** thousand British pounds per acre in the first half of 2017 to under *** thousand British pounds per acre in the second half of 2017.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
ABSTRACT: In this study, the share of land rent in the fixed costs of wheat production was examined, and the aim of the study was to find land values using cost tables. To this purpose, we showed the effect of these on land values from the difference between field rents and net income. The study covered the district of Polatlı in Ankara province. Data on wheat production in Polatlı in 2017 was collected from six villages and 37 farms by means of a questionnaire. In selecting the farms, the ability to determine the land rent was taken into account as a selection criterion. The farms examined used on average per hectare, 11.9 hours of labor, 7.7 hours of draft power, 354.3 kg of fertilizer, 205.5 kg of seed, and 1.5 liters of agricultural chemicals. The average wheat production cost per hectare was $865.42; the average unit production cost was $0.23, and the production value was reported to be $1012.40/da. In this study, the land rent was of $225.40, and the net income from the land was reported to be $372.42. It was reported an evaluation performed using the taxation tables that land values according to rental incomes were $4508.80/ha, and $7448.40 when the land was worked by the landowner. Land rent constituted 26.05% of total production costs, and were equivalent to 22.26% of production value. When crop prices increased by 1%, income from the land increased by 4.49%.
Estimated areas, production, yield, average farm price and total farm value of principal field crops.
This publication shows estimates of average farm rents paid in England under full agricultural tenancies, farm business tenancies, seasonal agreements and informal agreements, as well as the area of land covered by these agreements.
Next update: see the statistics release calendar
Defra statistics: Farm Business Survey
Email mailto:fbs.queries@defra.gov.uk">fbs.queries@defra.gov.uk
<p class="govuk-body">You can also contact us via X: <a href="https://x.com/DefraStats" class="govuk-link">https://x.com/DefraStats</a></p>
Syngenta is committed to increasing crop productivity and to using limited resources such as land, water and inputs more efficiently. Since 2014, Syngenta has been measuring trends in agricultural input efficiency on a global network of real farms. The Good Growth Plan dataset shows aggregated productivity and resource efficiency indicators by harvest year. The data has been collected from more than 4,000 farms and covers more than 20 different crops in 46 countries. The data (except USA data and for Barley in UK, Germany, Poland, Czech Republic, France and Spain) was collected, consolidated and reported by Kynetec (previously Market Probe), an independent market research agency. It can be used as benchmarks for crop yield and input efficiency.
National coverage
Agricultural holdings
Sample survey data [ssd]
A. Sample design Farms are grouped in clusters, which represent a crop grown in an area with homogenous agro- ecological conditions and include comparable types of farms. The sample includes reference and benchmark farms. The reference farms were selected by Syngenta and the benchmark farms were randomly selected by Kynetec within the same cluster.
B. Sample size Sample sizes for each cluster are determined with the aim to measure statistically significant increases in crop efficiency over time. This is done by Kynetec based on target productivity increases and assumptions regarding the variability of farm metrics in each cluster. The smaller the expected increase, the larger the sample size needed to measure significant differences over time. Variability within clusters is assumed based on public research and expert opinion. In addition, growers are also grouped in clusters as a means of keeping variances under control, as well as distinguishing between growers in terms of crop size, region and technological level. A minimum sample size of 20 interviews per cluster is needed. The minimum number of reference farms is 5 of 20. The optimal number of reference farms is 10 of 20 (balanced sample).
C. Selection procedure The respondents were picked randomly using a “quota based random sampling” procedure. Growers were first randomly selected and then checked if they complied with the quotas for crops, region, farm size etc. To avoid clustering high number of interviews at one sampling point, interviewers were instructed to do a maximum of 5 interviews in one village.
BF Screened from India were selected based on the following criterion:
(a) Corn growers in Davanagere, Belgaum, Warangal, Kurnool (all = districts)
Location: Davanegere, Belgaum, Warangal, Kurnool
Average adapter of innovation
Mechanized tillage operation due labour shortage
Keeps animals for milk
Corn forage is used for animal feeding
Keep update on commercial market trend
Secondary source of Agriculture income is dairy
Relies on high fertilizer use. (Farmers who use >2 bags of urea and 1 bag of DAP per acre is considered as High fertilizer use growers)
Low use of crop protection products (aim for growers who don't use CPP, if not possible, low use --> UPDATED: maximum of 2 sprays!)
Traditional way of weed control (bullock drawn harrow followed by ridging)
(b) Cotton growers in WC & South
Location: Yavatmal , Akola, Aurangabad, Jalgaon, Warangal , Kurnool , Karimnagar (= all districts)
Commercial, normally traditional practices but a few always looks for new products. (Use hybrids and are interested in new products which deliver higher yields, with less disease and pests.)
Very particular about quality seed.
High expectation of profit from farming.
Good investment on inputs for getting maximum returns.
Some irrigation available but not sufficient, Manual operations.
Social and seeks knowledge from other fellow farmers and retailers. Western regions: I take all decisions in terms of cotton production by myself, without consulting fellow farmers, retailers, agronomists or sales representatives (based on answers of RF)
Use generic / branded chemistry
Dependent on retailers to fund his crop protection chemicals
Prefer Cotton hybrid which give good re flushing
Rotation with Bengalgram
(c) Rice growers in North & East
Location: Karnal, Ludhiana, Sri Muktsar Sahib, Patiala, Allahabad,Gorakhpur, Barabanki (North & East)
Commercial ,Average adapter of innovation.
Medium input cost. (Spend 300 - 500 Rs on fertilizers, About 400-500 Rs on CP products can be considered as moderate or medium input cost.)
Mechanized tillage operations due to shortage of labour.
Good use of CP products. (Use products of leading MNCs; new chemistry/new products etc)
Very particular about quality seeds.
Always look forward to new technologies that would reduce costs or increase profits.
High expectation of profits from farming.
Good investment on input for getting maximum returns.
Not aware about soil fertility issues.
Use generic chemicals
Dependent on commission agent for his recurring expenses or retailer to fund his inputs. = ALL BACKGROUND INFO
May or may not own a tractor.
High involvement of retailer/ commission agent on his decision of CP inputs
Rice wheat rotation.
(d) Rice growers in East
Location: Ranchi, Raipur (= west), Burdwan, Midnapore , Bhagalpur . (= East)
Late adapter of innovation . --> UPDATED: Western region (Raipur): BF is not late adapter of innovation (based on answer of RF)
Usage of hybrid Rice or traditional varieties . (Either Open Pollinated Varieties or certified hybrids is fine. )
Moderate usage of CP products . (The spend on CP products is relatively lower i.e. less number of sprays or lower dose of recommended CP products. ) = ALL BACKGROUND INFO
Lack of resources ( irrigation, finance ) ,less educated ,traditional (= background info),low financial status .
Primarily dependent on farm for food and income. --> RF in Raipur (western region) says to not depend on his farm for income but BF will be recruited based on the original screening criteria above
not aware about soil fertility . --> UPDATED: in western region: BF are aware about soil fertility (based on answer of RF) --> UPDATED: Eastern region (Jharkhand & Bihar): BF are aware about soil fertility (based on answer of RF)
Depends on fertilizer for enhancing productivity.
Usage of generic chemistry.
May or may not own tractor.
High involvement of retailer on his decision of CP inputs . --> RF in Raipur (western region) says to take all decisions himself but BF will be recruited based on the original screening criteria above
Migrated farmers adopt technology . = ALL BACKGROUND INFO
Traditional cultivation practice. (This generally means OPV, little fertilizers and little chemicals.) = ALL BACKGROUND INFO
Conversion happening from OP to hybrid seeds in rainfed areas. = ALL BACKGROUND INFO
(e) Tomato growers
location: Nasik, Pune, Ahmednagar, Belgaum, Vadodara, Jaipur.
Early adapter of innovation.
Mechanized tillage operations due to labour shortage.
Very particular about quality Seeds.
Always look forward to new CP technologies to increase profit
Good crop knowledge & Use advance chemistry ( Farmers who use newly launched, high performance CP products from leading MNCs can be considered as "Advance" or new chemistry products.). --> UPDATED: in Western regions: only have a little bit of knowledge about this and use only a little bit (based on answers of RF)
Use of SYT tomato seeds & CP products. (only for RF, BF can use SYT products but not necessarily) = ALL BACKGROUND INFO, is asked in screening but nobody is screened out (!)
Keep updates on commercial market trend .
Irrigated farms
Has milch animals. --> UPDATED: in Western regions, not all should have livestock (based on answer of RF)
Brand loyalty
Commercially very active.
Knows market prices in leading cities.
Has relationship with market forces.
Keeps in touch with other progressive farmers, good retailers and company professionals.
(f) Soybean growers
location: Ratlam, Dhar, Hoshangabad, Washim
Follow traditional cultivation practices . (Usually the use of farm-saved seeds and varieties, do not use adequate fertilizers, follow traditional interculture practices etc.)
Limited technical knowledge.
Many use farm saved seed.
Mechanized tillage and spraying operation.
Use of tractor for sowing and threshing operations.
Low investment on input in comparison with actual requirement.
Farmers are members of co-operative society in some areas. = ALL BACKGROUND INFO
Soyabean wheat rotation
Some involvement of retailer/commission agent on his decision of CP inputs.
Face-to-face [f2f]
Data collection tool for 2019 covered the following information:
(A) PRE- HARVEST INFORMATION
PART I: Screening PART II: Contact Information PART III: Farm Characteristics a. Biodiversity conservation b. Soil conservation c. Soil erosion d. Description of growing area e. Training on crop cultivation and safety measures PART IV: Farming Practices - Before Harvest a. Planting and fruit development - Field crops b. Planting and fruit development - Tree crops c. Planting and fruit development - Sugarcane d. Planting and fruit development - Cauliflower e. Seed treatment
(B) HARVEST INFORMATION
PART V: Farming Practices - After Harvest a. Fertilizer usage b. Crop protection products c. Harvest timing & quality per crop - Field crops d. Harvest timing & quality per crop - Tree crops e. Harvest timing & quality per crop - Sugarcane f. Harvest timing & quality per crop - Banana g. After harvest PART VI - Other inputs - After Harvest a.
The value per acre of farmland and buildings in New Brunswick increased by 594 dollars (+15.86 percent) compared to the previous year. Therefore, the value per acre in New Brunswick reached a peak in 2023 with 4,340 dollars. Notably, the value per acre continuously increased over the last years.Find more key insights for the value per acre of farmland and buildings in countries and regions like value per acre of farmland and buildings (Prince Edward Island), value per acre of farmland and buildings (Alberta), and value per acre of farmland and buildings (Nova Scotia).
CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
Archives CPR Land Sales Catalogue contains records of sales of agricultural land by the Canadian Pacific Railway to settlers in Manitoba, Saskatchewan, and Alberta from 1881 to 1927. The information includes the name of the purchaser, legal description of the land (i.e. NW-23-4-18-W4), number of acres purchased, and cost per acre. These records are often used when applying for Century Farm status.
CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
This product summarizes fertilizer consumption in the United States by plant nutrient and major fertilizer products—as well as consumption of mixed fertilizers, secondary nutrients, and micronutrients—for 1960 through the latest year for which statistics are available. The share of planted crop acreage receiving fertilizer, and fertilizer applications per receiving acre (by nutrient), are presented for major producing States for corn, cotton, soybeans, and wheat (data on nutrient consumption by crop start in 1964). Fertilizer farm prices and indices of wholesale fertilizer prices are also available.This record was taken from the USDA Enterprise Data Inventory that feeds into the https://data.gov catalog. Data for this record includes the following resources: Data file For complete information, please visit https://data.gov.
Farm operating revenues and expenses for all farm types and revenue classes, available on an annual basis.
In 2024, the average value of U.S. farm real estate was 4,170 U.S. dollars per acre. Compared to one decade earlier, the value has increased by almost 40 percent. Generally, the value of U.S. farm real estate has had an upward trend since 1970. U.S. farms The number of farms in the United States has conversely been decreasing each year, reaching about two million farms as of 2022. That year, Texas had the most farms out of any other U.S. state by far, with about 246,000 farms. Missouri and Iowa had the second and third most farms, though neither state exceeded 100,000 farms. Agricultural trade Agricultural products encompass any products from agricultural origin that are meant for human consumption or animal feed. Agricultural products can include livestock products or crops. In 2022, the U.S. exported about 196.4 billion U.S. dollars’ worth of agricultural goods worldwide, increasing from the previous several years. Mexico is a key destination for U.S. agricultural products and imported just over 28 billion dollars’ worth in 2022, more than Europe and Eurasia combined.