West Virginia and Kansas had the lowest cost of living across all U.S. states, with composite costs being half of those found in Hawaii. This was according to a composite index that compares prices for various goods and services on a state-by-state basis. In West Virginia, the cost of living index amounted to **** — well below the national benchmark of 100. Virginia— which had an index value of ***** — was only slightly above that benchmark. Expensive places to live included Hawaii, Massachusetts, and California. Housing costs in the U.S. Housing is usually the highest expense in a household’s budget. In 2023, the average house sold for approximately ******* U.S. dollars, but house prices in the Northeast and West regions were significantly higher. Conversely, the South had some of the least expensive housing. In West Virginia, Mississippi, and Louisiana, the median price of the typical single-family home was less than ******* U.S. dollars. That makes living expenses in these states significantly lower than in states such as Hawaii and California, where housing is much pricier. What other expenses affect the cost of living? Utility costs such as electricity, natural gas, water, and internet also influence the cost of living. In Alaska, Hawaii, and Connecticut, the average monthly utility cost exceeded *** U.S. dollars. That was because of the significantly higher prices for electricity and natural gas in these states.
In 2020, the cost of living index for food and beverages in Saudi Arabia was ******, which implies an increase of ***** percent from the year 2018. In the same year, the general cost of living was ******.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The average for 2021 based on 165 countries was 79.81 index points. The highest value was in Bermuda: 212.7 index points and the lowest value was in Syria: 33.25 index points. The indicator is available from 2017 to 2021. Below is a chart for all countries where data are available.
In 2020, the index for the cost of living for housing and utilities in Saudi Arabia was 90.83, implying a 9.17 percent decrease in the price level compared to 2018. This was also decrease in the housing and utilities price level compared to the previous year. The general consumer price index for that year was 101.28.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Living Cost: Average per Month: SF: Republic of Crimea data was reported at 11,074.000 RUB in Dec 2020. This records an increase from the previous number of 10,945.000 RUB for Sep 2020. Living Cost: Average per Month: SF: Republic of Crimea data is updated quarterly, averaging 9,798.500 RUB from Sep 2014 (Median) to Dec 2020, with 26 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 11,074.000 RUB in Dec 2020 and a record low of 5,786.000 RUB in Sep 2014. Living Cost: Average per Month: SF: Republic of Crimea data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Federal State Statistics Service. The data is categorized under Russia Premium Database’s Household Survey – Table RU.HF001: Living Cost.
In 2020, the cost of living index for transportation in Saudi Arabia was *****, implying a *** percent increase of the price level compared to 2018. The general consumer price index for that year was ******.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Living Cost: Average per Month: FE: Chukotka Area data was reported at 23,999.000 RUB in Dec 2020. This records an increase from the previous number of 23,860.000 RUB for Sep 2020. Living Cost: Average per Month: FE: Chukotka Area data is updated quarterly, averaging 11,724.000 RUB from Jun 2003 (Median) to Dec 2020, with 71 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 23,999.000 RUB in Dec 2020 and a record low of 5,744.000 RUB in Dec 2003. Living Cost: Average per Month: FE: Chukotka Area data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Federal State Statistics Service. The data is categorized under Russia Premium Database’s Household Survey – Table RU.HF001: Living Cost.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Living Cost: Average per Month: Volga Region Federal District (VR): Republic of Bashkortostan data was reported at 9,834.000 RUB in Dec 2020. This records a decrease from the previous number of 9,908.000 RUB for Sep 2020. Living Cost: Average per Month: Volga Region Federal District (VR): Republic of Bashkortostan data is updated quarterly, averaging 5,407.000 RUB from Jun 2001 (Median) to Dec 2020, with 79 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 10,015.000 RUB in Jun 2020 and a record low of 1,333.000 RUB in Sep 2001. Living Cost: Average per Month: Volga Region Federal District (VR): Republic of Bashkortostan data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Federal State Statistics Service. The data is categorized under Russia Premium Database’s Household Survey – Table RU.HF001: Living Cost.
Background:
A household food consumption and expenditure survey has been conducted each year in Great Britain (excluding Northern Ireland) since 1940. At that time the National Food Survey (NFS) covered a sample drawn solely from urban working-class households, but this was extended to a fully demographically representative sample in 1950. From 1957 onwards the Family Expenditure Survey (FES) provided information on all household expenditure patterns including food expenditure, with the NFS providing more detailed information on food consumption and expenditure. The NFS was extended to cover Northern Ireland from 1996 onwards. In April 2001 these surveys were combined to form the Expenditure and Food Survey (EFS), which completely replaced both series. From January 2008, the EFS became known as the Living Costs and Food (LCF) module of the Integrated Household Survey (IHS). As a consequence of this change, the questionnaire was altered to accommodate the insertion of a core set of questions, common to all of the separate modules which together comprised the IHS. Some of these core questions are simply questions which were previously asked in the same or a similar format on all of the IHS component surveys. For further information on the LCF questionnaire, see Volume A of the LCF 2008 User Guide, held with SN 6385. Further information about the LCF, including links to published reports based on the survey, may be found by searching for 'Living Costs and Food Survey' on the ONS website. Further information on the NFS and Living Costs and Food Module of the IHS can be found by searching for 'Family Food' on the GOV.UK website.
History:
The LCF (then EFS) was the result of more than two years' development work to bring together the FES and NFS; both survey series were well-established and important sources of information for government and the wider community, and had charted changes and patterns in spending and food consumption since the 1950s. Whilst the NFS and FES series are now finished, users should note that previous data from both series are still available from the UK Data Archive, under GNs 33071 (NFS) and 33057 (FES).
Purpose of the LCF
The Office for National Statistics (ONS) has overall project management and financial responsibility for the LCF, while the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) sponsors the food data element. As with the FES and NFS, the LCF continues to be primarily used to provide information for the Retail Prices Index, National Accounts estimates of household expenditure, analysis of the effect of taxes and benefits, and trends in nutrition. The results are multi-purpose, however, providing an invaluable supply of economic and social data. The merger of the two surveys also brings benefits for users, as a single survey on food expenditure removes the difficulties of reconciling data from two sources.
Design and methodology
The design of the LCF is based on the old FES, although the use of new processing software by the data creators has resulted in a dataset which differs from the previous structure. The most significant change in terms of reporting expenditure, however, is the introduction of the European Standard Classification of Individual Consumption by Purpose (COICOP), in place of the codes previously used. An additional level of hierarchy has been developed to improve the mapping to the previous codes. The LCF was conducted on a financial year basis from 2001, then moved to a calendar year basis from January 2006 (to complement the IHS) until 2015-16, when the financial year survey was reinstated at the request of users. Therefore, whilst SN 5688 covers April 2005 - March 2006, SN 5986 covers January-December 2006. Subsequent years cover January-December until 2014. SN 8210 returns to the financial year survey and currently covers April 2015 - March 2016.
Northern Ireland sample
Users should note that, due to funding constraints, from January 2010 the Northern Ireland (NI) sample used for the LCF was reduced to a sample proportionate to the NI population relative to the UK.
Family Food database:
'Family Food' is an annual publication which provides detailed statistical information on purchased quantities, expenditure and nutrient intakes derived from both household and eating out food and drink. Data is collected for a sample of households in the United Kingdom using self-reported diaries of all purchases, including food eaten out, over a two week period. Where possible quantities are recorded in the diaries but otherwise estimated. Energy and nutrient intakes are calculated using standard nutrient composition data for each of some 500 types of food. Current estimates are based on data collected in the Family Food Module of the LCFS. Further information about the LCF food databases can be found on the GOV.UK Family Food Statistics web pages.
Secure Access version
A Secure Access version of the LCF from 2006 onwards is available from the UK Data Archive under SN 7047, subject to stringent access conditions. The Secure Access version includes variables that are not included in the standard End User Licence (EUL) version, including geographical variables with detail below Government Office Region, to postcode level; urban/rural area indicators; other sensitive variables; raw diary information files (derived variables are available in the EUL) and the family expenditure codes files. Users are strongly advised to check whether the EUL version is sufficient for their needs before considering an application for the Secure Access version.
Occupation data for 2021 and 2022 data files
The ONS have identified an issue with the collection of some
occupational data in 2021 and 2022 data files in a number of their
surveys. While they estimate any impacts will be small overall, this
will affect the
accuracy of the breakdowns of some detailed (four-digit Standard
Occupational
Classification (SOC)) occupations, and data derived from them. None of
ONS' headline
statistics, other than those directly sourced from occupational data,
are affected and you
can continue to rely on their accuracy. For further information on this
issue, please see:
https://www.ons.gov.uk/news/statementsandletters/occupationaldatainonssurveys.
DEFRA Family Food database:
This is available as a separate Access download zip file for those users who require it.
Latest edition information:
For the second edition (May 2023), the DEFRA Family Food database has been added to the study.
Find out how Australians feel about the increasing cost of living in our latest survey, as well as the latest data from the Cost of Living Index in 2024.
Open Government Licence 3.0http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/
License information was derived automatically
People in Great Britain's experiences of and actions following increases in their costs of living, and how these differed by a range of personal characteristics.
Open Government Licence 3.0http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/
License information was derived automatically
Characteristics of sampled households in the Living Costs and Food Survey.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Living Cost: Average per Month: NC: Republic of Ingushetia data was reported at 10,353.000 RUB in Dec 2020. This records an increase from the previous number of 10,336.000 RUB for Sep 2020. Living Cost: Average per Month: NC: Republic of Ingushetia data is updated quarterly, averaging 4,872.500 RUB from Mar 2001 (Median) to Dec 2020, with 80 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 10,571.000 RUB in Jun 2020 and a record low of 1,121.000 RUB in Mar 2001. Living Cost: Average per Month: NC: Republic of Ingushetia data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Federal State Statistics Service. The data is categorized under Russia Premium Database’s Household Survey – Table RU.HF001: Living Cost.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Living Cost: Children: Average per Month: NW: Republic of Komi data was reported at 14,701.000 RUB in Dec 2020. This stayed constant from the previous number of 14,701.000 RUB for Sep 2020. Living Cost: Children: Average per Month: NW: Republic of Komi data is updated quarterly, averaging 7,511.500 RUB from Mar 2001 (Median) to Dec 2020, with 80 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 14,701.000 RUB in Dec 2020 and a record low of 1,673.000 RUB in Mar 2001. Living Cost: Children: Average per Month: NW: Republic of Komi data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Federal State Statistics Service. The data is categorized under Russia Premium Database’s Household Survey – Table RU.HF004: Living Cost: Children.
In 2020, the cost of living index for communication in Saudi Arabia was ******, implying a **** percent increase of the price level compared to 2018. The general consumer price index for that year was ******.
The Consumer price surveys primarily provide the following: Data on CPI in Palestine covering the West Bank, Gaza Strip and Jerusalem J1 for major and sub groups of expenditure. Statistics needed for decision-makers, planners and those who are interested in the national economy. Contribution to the preparation of quarterly and annual national accounts data.
Consumer Prices and indices are used for a wide range of purposes, the most important of which are as follows: Adjustment of wages, government subsidies and social security benefits to compensate in part or in full for the changes in living costs. To provide an index to measure the price inflation of the entire household sector, which is used to eliminate the inflation impact of the components of the final consumption expenditure of households in national accounts and to dispose of the impact of price changes from income and national groups. Price index numbers are widely used to measure inflation rates and economic recession. Price indices are used by the public as a guide for the family with regard to its budget and its constituent items. Price indices are used to monitor changes in the prices of the goods traded in the market and the consequent position of price trends, market conditions and living costs. However, the price index does not reflect other factors affecting the cost of living, e.g. the quality and quantity of purchased goods. Therefore, it is only one of many indicators used to assess living costs. It is used as a direct method to identify the purchasing power of money, where the purchasing power of money is inversely proportional to the price index.
Palestine West Bank Gaza Strip Jerusalem
The target population for the CPI survey is the shops and retail markets such as grocery stores, supermarkets, clothing shops, restaurants, public service institutions, private schools and doctors.
The target population for the CPI survey is the shops and retail markets such as grocery stores, supermarkets, clothing shops, restaurants, public service institutions, private schools and doctors.
Sample survey data [ssd]
A non-probability purposive sample of sources from which the prices of different goods and services are collected was updated based on the establishment census 2017, in a manner that achieves full coverage of all goods and services that fall within the Palestinian consumer system. These sources were selected based on the availability of the goods within them. It is worth mentioning that the sample of sources was selected from the main cities inside Palestine: Jenin, Tulkarm, Nablus, Qalqiliya, Ramallah, Al-Bireh, Jericho, Jerusalem, Bethlehem, Hebron, Gaza, Jabalia, Dier Al-Balah, Nusseirat, Khan Yunis and Rafah. The selection of these sources was considered to be representative of the variation that can occur in the prices collected from the various sources. The number of goods and services included in the CPI is approximately 730 commodities, whose prices were collected from 3,200 sources. (COICOP) classification is used for consumer data as recommended by the United Nations System of National Accounts (SNA-2008).
Not apply
Computer Assisted Personal Interview [capi]
A tablet-supported electronic form was designed for price surveys to be used by the field teams in collecting data from different governorates, with the exception of Jerusalem J1. The electronic form is supported with GIS, and GPS mapping technique that allow the field workers to locate the outlets exactly on the map and the administrative staff to manage the field remotely. The electronic questionnaire is divided into a number of screens, namely: First screen: shows the metadata for the data source, governorate name, governorate code, source code, source name, full source address, and phone number. Second screen: shows the source interview result, which is either completed, temporarily paused or permanently closed. It also shows the change activity as incomplete or rejected with the explanation for the reason of rejection. Third screen: shows the item code, item name, item unit, item price, product availability, and reason for unavailability. Fourth screen: checks the price data of the related source and verifies their validity through the auditing rules, which was designed specifically for the price programs. Fifth screen: saves and sends data through (VPN-Connection) and (WI-FI technology).
In case of the Jerusalem J1 Governorate, a paper form has been designed to collect the price data so that the form in the top part contains the metadata of the data source and in the lower section contains the price data for the source collected. After that, the data are entered into the price program database.
The price survey forms were already encoded by the project management depending on the specific international statistical classification of each survey. After the researcher collected the price data and sent them electronically, the data was reviewed and audited by the project management. Achievement reports were reviewed on a daily and weekly basis. Also, the detailed price reports at data source levels were checked and reviewed on a daily basis by the project management. If there were any notes, the researcher was consulted in order to verify the data and call the owner in order to correct or confirm the information.
At the end of the data collection process in all governorates, the data will be edited using the following process: Logical revision of prices by comparing the prices of goods and services with others from different sources and other governorates. Whenever a mistake is detected, it should be returned to the field for correction. Mathematical revision of the average prices for items in governorates and the general average in all governorates. Field revision of prices through selecting a sample of the prices collected from the items.
Not apply
The findings of the survey may be affected by sampling errors due to the use of samples in conducting the survey rather than total enumeration of the units of the target population, which increases the chances of variances between the actual values we expect to obtain from the data if we had conducted the survey using total enumeration. The computation of differences between the most important key goods showed that the variation of these goods differs due to the specialty of each survey. For example, for the CPI, the variation between its goods was very low, except in some cases such as banana, tomato, and cucumber goods that had a high coefficient of variation during 2019 due to the high oscillation in their prices. The variance of the key goods in the computed and disseminated CPI survey that was carried out on the Palestine level was for reasons related to sample design and variance calculation of different indicators since there was a difficulty in the dissemination of results by governorates due to lack of weights. Non-sampling errors are probable at all stages of data collection or data entry. Non-sampling errors include: Non-response errors: the selected sources demonstrated a significant cooperation with interviewers; so, there wasn't any case of non-response reported during 2019. Response errors (respondent), interviewing errors (interviewer), and data entry errors: to avoid these types of errors and reduce their effect to a minimum, project managers adopted a number of procedures, including the following: More than one visit was made to every source to explain the objectives of the survey and emphasize the confidentiality of the data. The visits to data sources contributed to empowering relations, cooperation, and the verification of data accuracy. Interviewer errors: a number of procedures were taken to ensure data accuracy throughout the process of field data compilation: Interviewers were selected based on educational qualification, competence, and assessment. Interviewers were trained theoretically and practically on the questionnaire. Meetings were held to remind interviewers of instructions. In addition, explanatory notes were supplied with the surveys. A number of procedures were taken to verify data quality and consistency and ensure data accuracy for the data collected by a questioner throughout processing and data entry (knowing that data collected through paper questionnaires did not exceed 5%): Data entry staff was selected from among specialists in computer programming and were fully trained on the entry programs. Data verification was carried out for 10% of the entered questionnaires to ensure that data entry staff had entered data correctly and in accordance with the provisions of the questionnaire. The result of the verification was consistent with the original data to a degree of 100%. The files of the entered data were received, examined, and reviewed by project managers before findings were extracted. Project managers carried out many checks on data logic and coherence, such as comparing the data of the current month with that of the previous month, and comparing the data of sources and between governorates. Data collected by tablet devices were checked for consistency and accuracy by applying rules at item level to be checked.
Other technical procedures to improve data quality: Seasonal adjustment processes
In 2020, the general cost of living index in Saudi Arabia was ******, implying a **** percent increase of the price level of the market basket of consumer goods and services from 2018. This was an increase in the general consumer price index compared to the previous year.
Monthly indexes and percentage changes for major components and special aggregates of the Consumer Price Index (CPI), not seasonally adjusted, for Canada, provinces, Whitehorse, Yellowknife and Iqaluit. Data are presented for the corresponding month of the previous year, the previous month and the current month. The base year for the index is 2002=100.
2019 2020 ADMINISTRATIVE AREAS AGE AIR TRAVEL ALCOHOLIC DRINKS APARTMENTS APPOINTMENT TO JOB ASSOCIATIONS BANK ACCOUNTS BANK CHARGES BEDROOMS BEVERAGES BICYCLES BONDS BONUS PAYMENTS BOOKS BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MATERIALS BUILDING OPERATIONS BUILDING SERVICES BUILDING SOCIETIES BUILDING SOCIETY AC... BUSINESS RECORDS CARE OF DEPENDANTS CARERS BENEFITS CARPETS CENTRAL HEATING CEREAL PRODUCTS CHARITABLE ORGANIZA... CHIEF INCOME EARNERS CHILD BENEFITS CHILD MINDING CHILD WORKERS CHILDREN CLEANING AGENTS CLEANING SERVICES CLOTHING COAL COHABITATION COLOUR TELEVISION R... COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS COMPACT DISC PLAYERS COMPANY CARS COMPUTER SOFTWARE COMPUTERS CONDITIONS OF EMPLO... CONFECTIONERY CONSUMER GOODS CONSUMERS CONSUMPTION CONVEYANCING COSTS COUNCIL TAX CREDIT CREDIT CARD USE CULTURAL GOODS Consumption and con... DAIRY PRODUCTS DEATH ALLOWANCES DIESEL OIL DIGITAL GAMES DISABLED PERSONS DOMESTIC APPLIANCES DRIVING DRIVING LICENCES DRUG USE ECONOMIC ACTIVITY ECONOMIC VALUE EDIBLE FATS EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND EDUCATIONAL COURSES EDUCATIONAL FEES EDUCATIONAL GRANTS EDUCATIONAL INSTITU... EGGS FOOD ELDERLY ELECTRIC POWER ELECTRIC POWER SUPPLY ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT ELECTRONIC COMMERCE ELEVATORS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYMENT EMPLOYMENT HISTORY EMPLOYMENT PROGRAMMES ENDOWMENT ASSURANCE ENERGY ENTERTAINMENT EQUIPMENT RENTAL ETHNIC GROUPS EXAMINATIONS EXPENDITURE FAMILIES FAMILY BENEFITS FEES FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS FINANCIAL RESOURCES FINANCIAL SUPPORT FINES FISH AS FOOD FOOD FOSSIL FUELS FOSTER CHILDREN FRINGE BENEFITS FRUIT FUEL OILS FULL TIME EMPLOYMENT FURNISHED ACCOMMODA... FURNITURE Family life and mar... GAMBLING GARAGES GARDENING GAS FUELS GAS SUPPLY GENDER GIFTS HEADS OF HOUSEHOLD HEALTH SERVICES HEATING SYSTEMS HIGHER EDUCATION HIGHER EDUCATION IN... HIRE PURCHASE HOBBIES HOLIDAYS HOLIDAYS ABROAD HOME BUYING HOME OWNERSHIP HOME SELLING HOME SHARING HORTICULTURE HOURS OF WORK HOUSEHOLD BUDGETS HOUSEHOLD PETS HOUSEHOLDS HOUSES HOUSING HOUSING BENEFITS HOUSING FINANCE HOUSING IMPROVEMENT HOUSING TENURE Health behaviour INCOME INCOME TAX INDUSTRIES INSURANCE INSURANCE CLAIMS INSURANCE PREMIUMS INTEREST FINANCE INTERNET INTERNET USE INVESTMENT INVESTMENT RETURN Income JOB DESCRIPTION JOB HUNTING JOB SEEKER S ALLOWANCE LANDLORDS LEAVE LEISURE GOODS LEISURE TIME ACTIVI... LESSONS LICENCES LIFE INSURANCE LOANS LOCAL TAX BENEFITS LODGERS LOTTERIES MAIL ORDER SERVICES MANAGERS MARITAL STATUS MARKETING MARRIED WOMEN MARRIED WOMEN WORKERS MATERNITY BENEFITS MATERNITY LEAVE MATERNITY PAY MEALS MEALS ON WHEELS MEAT MEDICAL CARE MEDICAL INSURANCE MEDICAL PRESCRIPTIONS METHODS OF PAYMENT MILK MOBILE HOMES MOBILE PHONES MORTGAGE PROTECTION... MORTGAGES MOTOR VEHICLE HIRE MOTOR VEHICLES NEWSPAPERS NUTRIENTS OCCUPATIONAL PENSIONS OCCUPATIONS ONE PARENT FAMILIES ONLINE BANKING ONLINE SERVICES ONLINE SHOPPING OUTDOOR PURSUITS OVERSEAS TRANSACTIONS OVERTIME PACKAGE HOLIDAYS PACKETED FOODS PART TIME COURSES PART TIME EMPLOYMENT PARTNERSHIPS BUSINESS PATERNITY LEAVE PENSION CONTRIBUTIONS PERIODICALS PERSONAL FASHION GOODS PET FOODS PETROL PETROLEUM PRODUCTS PHOTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT POCKET MONEY POSTAL SERVICES PRESERVED FOODS PRICES PRIVATE EDUCATION PRIVATE PENSIONS PRIVATE PERSONAL PE... PRIVATE SCHOOLS PRIVATE SECTOR PROFIT SHARING PROFITS PUBLIC SECTOR PURCHASING RATES REBATES RECREATIONAL EDUCATION REDUNDANCY REDUNDANCY PAY REMOVAL SERVICES RENTED ACCOMMODATION RENTS RESIDENTIAL MOBILITY RETAIL SERVICES RETIREMENT ROAD VEHICLE MAINTE... ROOM SHARING ROOMS ROYALTIES SALT SAME SEX RELATIONSHIPS SATELLITE RECEIVERS SAVINGS SCHOLARSHIPS SCHOOL MEALS SCHOOL MILK PROVISION SCHOOLCHILDREN SCHOOLS SECOND HOMES SELF EMPLOYED SERVICE INDUSTRIES SEWAGE DISPOSAL AND... SHARES SICK LEAVE SICK PAY SICK PERSONS SICKNESS AND DISABI... SMALL BUSINESSES SOAP SOCIAL CLASS SOCIAL HOUSING SOCIAL SECURITY SOCIAL SECURITY BEN... SOCIAL SECURITY CON... SOCIAL SERVICES SOCIO ECONOMIC STATUS SOFT DRINKS SPECTACLES SPORT SPORTS EQUIPMENT SPOUSES STATE RETIREMENT PE... STRIKE PAY STRIKES STUDENT LOANS STUDENT TRANSPORTATION STUDENTS SUBSCRIPTIONS SUBSIDIARY EMPLOYMENT SUPERVISORS TAKE AWAY MEALS TAX RELIEF TAXATION TELEPHONES TELEVISION CHANNELS TELEVISION LICENCES TELEVISION RECEIVERS TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT TENANTS HOME PURCHA... TIED HOUSING TINNED FOODS TOBACCO TOP MANAGEMENT TOURIST ACCOMMODATION TRADE UNIONS TRANSPORT TRAVEL TRAVEL PASSES TURNOVER TUTORING UNEARNED INCOME UNEMPLOYED UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS UNFURNISHED ACCOMMO... UNWAGED WORKERS United Kingdom VEGETABLE OILS VEGETABLES VIDEO RECORDERS WAGES WINNINGS WORKERS WORKING MOTHERS WORKING WOMEN WRITING MATERIALS property and invest...
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domainhttps://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domain
Graph and download economic data for Inflation, consumer prices for the United States (FPCPITOTLZGUSA) from 1960 to 2024 about consumer, CPI, inflation, price index, indexes, price, and USA.
West Virginia and Kansas had the lowest cost of living across all U.S. states, with composite costs being half of those found in Hawaii. This was according to a composite index that compares prices for various goods and services on a state-by-state basis. In West Virginia, the cost of living index amounted to **** — well below the national benchmark of 100. Virginia— which had an index value of ***** — was only slightly above that benchmark. Expensive places to live included Hawaii, Massachusetts, and California. Housing costs in the U.S. Housing is usually the highest expense in a household’s budget. In 2023, the average house sold for approximately ******* U.S. dollars, but house prices in the Northeast and West regions were significantly higher. Conversely, the South had some of the least expensive housing. In West Virginia, Mississippi, and Louisiana, the median price of the typical single-family home was less than ******* U.S. dollars. That makes living expenses in these states significantly lower than in states such as Hawaii and California, where housing is much pricier. What other expenses affect the cost of living? Utility costs such as electricity, natural gas, water, and internet also influence the cost of living. In Alaska, Hawaii, and Connecticut, the average monthly utility cost exceeded *** U.S. dollars. That was because of the significantly higher prices for electricity and natural gas in these states.