The price of tap water in the United States varied greatly from city to city in 2021. One of the most expensive cities for tap water in the U.S. is San Francisco, where one cubic meter costs an average of **** U.S. dollars per cubic meter. In comparison, citizens in the Arizona state capital of Phoenix paid, on average, **** U.S. dollars per cubic meter. This is roughly ** percent lower than the U.S. average. Rising water bills in the U.S. Over the past decade, water bills in the U.S. have increased considerably in a number of major cities. In Austin, Texas, water bills rose by *** U.S. dollars between 2010 and 2018, an increase of *** percent. The sharp rising costs has left many in the United States with unaffordable water bills, especially in low income areas in cities such as New Orleans, Cleveland, and Santa Fe. U.S. water crisis One of the reasons for the rising water bills in the U.S. is the aging and deteriorating water infrastructure. In addition to rising bills, outdated treatment plants with leaking pipes have resulted in harmful toxins and chemicals contaminating drinking water. A number of highly populated cities in the U.S. have been found to have high concentrations of PFAs in tap water, exposing millions of people to potentially unsafe drinking water.

Of the selected cities shown, many of the lowest drinking water prices are in Asia. Mumbai, India had the lowest average tap water price in 2021, at just **** U.S. dollars per 100 cubic meters. The capital city of the Indian state of Karnataka, Bangalore had the second lowest water price, where 100 cubic meters of drinking water cost **** U.S. dollars. The city of Miami in the US American state of Florida has one of the lowest tap water prices outside Asia at ***** U.S. dollars per 100 cubic meters. Most expensive water prices The price of water varies around the world, with some of the highest found in Europe. For example, in Oslo, Norway, citizens pay an average of *** U.S. dollars per 100 cubic meters. In the United States, cities with high levels of water stress – such as Los Angeles and San Diego – also pay high prices for tap water. The cost of water in many U.S. cities has been increasing in recent years, with water bills in San Diego having increased by *** U.S. dollars between 2010 and 2018. Water consumption Globally, per capita water withdrawals are highest in the U.S., with the average American withdrawing ***** cubic meters of water a year. This is roughly twice the per capita withdrawals in Japan, and four times more than in Germany.

Of the selected European cities shown, the Norwegian capital of Oslo had the most expensive tap water in 2021, averaging **** U.S. dollars per cubic meter. This was followed by Germany's manufacturing hub Stuttgart, where 1,000 liters of tap water cost **** U.S. dollars. Europe has some of the most expensive tap water prices worldwide.

This submission contains a set of U.S.-specific potable reuse capital and operations and maintenance (O&M) cost data ($2020) found in published presentations and reports from engineering consulting firms, utility and water agency press releases or websites, and literature. For any unbuilt facilities, the reported costs found in technical documents are mostly engineer estimates and may be subject to change as construction proceeds. This data set contains a mix of both facility specific and total capital costs, which include conveyance infrastructure. Note that this dataset does not include detailed cost breakdowns for each of the facilities. This submission also contains the sources used to build this dataset in pdf format.

Operational, financial, and land use data to estimate drinking water treatment cost functions for 2006 calendar year. Data are organized for surface water and groundwater systems. This dataset is not publicly accessible because: EPA cannot release personally identifiable information regarding living individuals, according to the Privacy Act and the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). This dataset contains information about human research subjects. Because there is potential to identify individual participants and disclose personal information, either alone or in combination with other datasets, individual level data are not appropriate to post for public access. Restricted access may be granted to authorized persons by contacting the party listed. It can be accessed through the following means: US EPA's Office of Water, Office of Science and Technology, Engineering and Analysis Division is the holder of the survey data. US EPA's Office of Water maintains a database of point coordinates for surface water intakes and wells used for public water supply. Format: Our dataset is described in detail in Section 3 of the paper. We include a link to the 2006 Community Water System Survey that excludes the identifiers. Other data are confidential business information.

This dataset is associated with the following publication: Price, J., and M. Heberling. The Effects of Agricultural and Urban Land Use on Drinking Water Treatment Costs: An Analysis of United States Community Water Systems. Water Economics and Policy. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., 5 Toh Tuck Link, SINGAPORE, 6(4): 2050008, (2020).

An average U.S. family of four pays about ***** U.S. dollars for water every month as of 2019, if each person used about 100 gallons per day. The price index of water and sewage maintenance have increased in recent years as infrastructure continues to age across the United States.

Setting water rates

Cities that have increased prices in water, generally use the increased rate to improve infrastructure. Families generally pay a fixed charge every month which is independent of water consumption, and a variable charge which is related to the amount of water used. Higher fixed charges are more commonly used to ensure revenue stability due to increased pipe repair costs, however, it reduces the incentive to conserve water and may punish households that use less water.

Water prices worldwide

Water prices vary across the countries and cities due to the various processes that are used to assign a price. Utilities generally set a water rate or tariff based on costs of water treatment, water storage, transport, wastewater treatment and collection, and other administrative operations. On the other hand, direct abstraction of water from sources such as lakes, is usually not charged, however, some countries require payment based on volume or abstraction rights.

Of the selected cities shown, many of the highest tap water prices in 2021 are in European cities, with the most expensive in Moscow, Russia at ***** U.S. dollars per 100 cubic meters. This was followed by Vancouver, Canada where 100 cubic meters of water costed ***** U.S. dollars.

Data set used to estimate the autoregressive distributed lag (ADL) model to understand how water quality measures (e.g., raw water TOC and algal toxin) and other variables affect drinking water treatment costs at the Bob McEwen Water Treatment Plant in southwestern OH. This dataset is associated with the following publication: Heberling, M., J.I. Price, C. Nietch, M. Elovitz, N. Smucker, D.A. Schupp, A. Safwat, and T. Neyer. Linking Water Quality to Drinking Water Treatment Costs Using Time Series Analysis: Examining the Effect of a Treatment Plant Upgrade in Ohio. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, USA, 58(5): e2021WR031257, (2022).

The associated excel files hold the cost predictions for nitrate and perchlorate treatment based on a series of assumptions outlined in the paper. No experimental data was generated in this project.

This dataset is associated with the following publication: Latham , M. SSWR FY14 Output Summary Report: Performance information and design tools are developed for innovative technologies and approaches for Small Drinking Water and Wastewater Systems. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA.

Dataset of different AWG units and bottled water units for different scales were provided. The LCA results of the different systems were provided as well.

This dataset is associated with the following publication: Absar, M., S. Cashman, X. Ma, J. Garland, and M. Jahne. Life Cycle and Cost Assessments of Atmospheric Water Generation Technologies and Alternative Potable Water Emergency Response Options. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA.

Snapshot img

Bottled Water Market Size 2025-2029

The bottled water market size is forecast to increase by USD 118.5 billion at a CAGR of 6.1% between 2024 and 2029.

The market is experiencing significant growth driven by the increasing premiumization of bottled water. Consumers are increasingly seeking high-quality, purified water options, leading to a shift towards premium bottled water brands. This trend is further fueled by the growing health consciousness among consumers, as bottled water is perceived as a healthier alternative to sugary beverages. Another key trend in the market is the innovation in bottled water packaging. Companies are investing in eco-friendly, lightweight, and convenient packaging solutions to cater to the evolving consumer preferences. These innovations not only help reduce the environmental impact but also make bottled water more accessible and convenient for consumers on-the-go.
However, the market faces challenges from alternative products, including tap water filtration systems and reusable water bottles. The market offers a diverse range of products, from alkaline water to functional drinks, and caters to various consumer preferences and needs. These alternatives offer cost-effective solutions and reduce the environmental impact associated with bottled water. To counter this, bottled water companies are focusing on differentiating their offerings through premiumization, packaging innovations, and marketing strategies to attract and retain consumers. Companies that effectively navigate these challenges and capitalize on market opportunities are well-positioned to succeed in the dynamic market.

What will be the Size of the Bottled Water Market during the forecast period?

Explore in-depth regional segment analysis with market size data - historical 2019-2023 and forecasts 2025-2029 - in the full report.
Request Free Sample

The market is experiencing dynamic shifts, driven by various factors including water pricing models, social responsibility, and consumer health concerns. Companies are investing in water bottling equipment and implementing water quality certification to ensure transparency in their supply chains. E-commerce platforms are revolutionizing retail sales channels, while environmental sustainability and water resource management are key brand building strategies. Water testing methods and safety protocols are crucial in addressing consumer concerns, as is water footprint reduction through efficient product lifecycle management. With the global focus on safe drinking water, the market's expansion is fueled by the health and wellness trend, particularly among working professionals and in-house consumers. Water analytics and data-driven decision making are essential for navigating regional water markets and emerging water trends.

Water industry regulations, water conservation initiatives, and water security are shaping the market landscape, with water scarcity and distribution networks posing significant challenges. Product innovation, water purification technologies, and corporate social responsibility are critical components of a sustainable water industry. Water quality monitoring, consumer behavior, and packaging design are interconnected aspects of the market, with an increasing focus on water analytics and lifecycle assessment. Water resource management and water distribution systems are being optimized through technology and innovation, ensuring a secure and sustainable water supply for businesses and consumers alike.

How is this Bottled Water Industry segmented?

The bottled water industry research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD billion' for the period 2025-2029, as well as historical data from 2019-2023 for the following segments.

Product

  Still drinking water
  Sparkling water
  Bottled spring water


Distribution Channel

  Off-trade
  On-trade


Packaging

  PET bottles
  Glass bottles
  Cans
  Others


Geography

  North America

    US
    Canada


  Europe

    France
    Germany


  APAC

    China
    India
    Indonesia
    Japan
    South Korea


  South America

    Brazil


  Rest of World (ROW)

By Product Insights

The still drinking water segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period. The market experiences significant growth due to various factors, including the increasing preference for alcoholic beverages, rising urbanization, and packaging innovations. Still drinking water, which is non-carbonated, holds a dominant share in the market. Consumers' health consciousness drives the demand for pure and clean drinking water, leading them to avoid carbonated beverages. The contamination of water sources due to environmental pollution further fuels the market's growth. New product development, such as flavored and mineral waters, caters to div

In 2023, the average selling price of industrial tap water in China amounted to ****** U.S. dollars per cubic meter. This was a decrease of *** percent compared to 2021.

Worksheet titled Data for ECM: Data set used to estimate the error correction model to understand how turbidity and other variables affect drinking water treatment costs. Worksheet titled Data for PDL: Data set used to estimate the polynomial distributed lag model to understand how phosphorus load entering reservoir impacts turbidity at the drinking water treatment plant. This dataset is associated with the following publication: Heberling , M., C. Nietch , H. Thurston , M. Elovitz , K. Birkenhauer, S. Panguluri, B. Ramakrishnan, E. Heiser, and T. Neyer. Comparing drinking water treatment costs to source water protection costs using time series analysis.. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, USA, 51(11): 8741-8756, (2015).

Context Access to safe drinking-water is essential to health, a basic human right and a component of effective policy for health protection. This is important as a health and development issue at a national, regional and local level. In some regions, it has been shown that investments in water supply and sanitation can yield a net economic benefit, since the reductions in adverse health effects and health care costs outweigh the costs of undertaking the interventions.

1. pH value: PH is an important parameter in evaluating the acid–base balance of water. It is also the indicator of acidic or alkaline condition of water status. WHO has recommended maximum permissible limit of pH from 6.5 to 8.5. The current investigation ranges were 6.52–6.83 which are in the range of WHO standards.

2. Hardness: Hardness is mainly caused by calcium and magnesium salts. These salts are dissolved from geologic deposits through which water travels. The length of time water is in contact with hardness producing material helps determine how much hardness there is in raw water. Hardness was originally defined as the capacity of water to precipitate soap caused by Calcium and Magnesium.

3. Solids (Total dissolved solids - TDS): Water has the ability to dissolve a wide range of inorganic and some organic minerals or salts such as potassium, calcium, sodium, bicarbonates, chlorides, magnesium, sulfates etc. These minerals produced un-wanted taste and diluted color in appearance of water. This is the important parameter for the use of water. The water with high TDS value indicates that water is highly mineralized. Desirable limit for TDS is 500 mg/l and maximum limit is 1000 mg/l which prescribed for drinking purpose.

4. Chloramines: Chlorine and chloramine are the major disinfectants used in public water systems. Chloramines are most commonly formed when ammonia is added to chlorine to treat drinking water. Chlorine levels up to 4 milligrams per liter (mg/L or 4 parts per million (ppm)) are considered safe in drinking water.

5. Sulfate: Sulfates are naturally occurring substances that are found in minerals, soil, and rocks. They are present in ambient air, groundwater, plants, and food. The principal commercial use of sulfate is in the chemical industry. Sulfate concentration in seawater is about 2,700 milligrams per liter (mg/L). It ranges from 3 to 30 mg/L in most freshwater supplies, although much higher concentrations (1000 mg/L) are found in some geographic locations.

6. Conductivity: Pure water is not a good conductor of electric current rather’s a good insulator. Increase in ions concentration enhances the electrical conductivity of water. Generally, the amount of dissolved solids in water determines the electrical conductivity. Electrical conductivity (EC) actually measures the ionic process of a solution that enables it to transmit current. According to WHO standards, EC value should not exceeded 400 μS/cm.

7. Organic_carbon: Total Organic Carbon (TOC) in source waters comes from decaying natural organic matter (NOM) as well as synthetic sources. TOC is a measure of the total amount of carbon in organic compounds in pure water. According to US EPA < 2 mg/L as TOC in treated / drinking water, and < 4 mg/Lit in source water which is use for treatment.

8. Trihalomethanes: THMs are chemicals which may be found in water treated with chlorine. The concentration of THMs in drinking water varies according to the level of organic material in the water, the amount of chlorine required to treat the water, and the temperature of the water that is being treated. THM levels up to 80 ppm is considered safe in drinking water.

9. Turbidity: The turbidity of water depends on the quantity of solid matter present in the suspended state. It is a measure of light emitting properties of water and the test is used to indicate the quality of waste discharge with respect to colloidal matter. The mean turbidity value obtained for Wondo Genet Campus (0.98 NTU) is lower than the WHO recommended value of 5.00 NTU.

10. Potability: Indicates if water is safe for human consumption where 1 means Potable and 0 means Not potable.

Annual and monthly user costs in US dollars across all communities.

Context

Access to safe drinking-water is essential to health, a basic human right and a component of effective policy for health protection. This is important as a health and development issue at a national, regional and local level. In some regions, it has been shown that investments in water supply and sanitation can yield a net economic benefit, since the reductions in adverse health effects and health care costs outweigh the costs of undertaking the interventions.

Content

The water_potability.csv file contains water quality metrics for 3276 different water bodies.

1. pH value:

PH is an important parameter in evaluating the acid–base balance of water. It is also the indicator of acidic or alkaline condition of water status. WHO has recommended maximum permissible limit of pH from 6.5 to 8.5. The current investigation ranges were 6.52–6.83 which are in the range of WHO standards

2. Hardness:

Hardness is mainly caused by calcium and magnesium salts. These salts are dissolved from geologic deposits through which water travels. The length of time water is in contact with hardness producing material helps determine how much hardness there is in raw water. Hardness was originally defined as the capacity of water to precipitate soap caused by Calcium and Magnesium.

3. Solids (Total dissolved solids - TDS):

Water has the ability to dissolve a wide range of inorganic and some organic minerals or salts such as potassium, calcium, sodium, bicarbonates, chlorides, magnesium, sulfates etc. These minerals produced un-wanted taste and diluted color in appearance of water. This is the important parameter for the use of water. The water with high TDS value indicates that water is highly mineralized. Desirable limit for TDS is 500 mg/l and maximum limit is 1000 mg/l which prescribed for drinking purpose.

4. Chloramines:

Chlorine and chloramine are the major disinfectants used in public water systems. Chloramines are most commonly formed when ammonia is added to chlorine to treat drinking water. Chlorine levels up to 4 milligrams per liter (mg/L or 4 parts per million (ppm)) are considered safe in drinking water.

5. Sulfate:

Sulfates are naturally occurring substances that are found in minerals, soil, and rocks. They are present in ambient air, groundwater, plants, and food. The principal commercial use of sulfate is in the chemical industry. Sulfate concentration in seawater is about 2,700 milligrams per liter (mg/L). It ranges from 3 to 30 mg/L in most freshwater supplies, although much higher concentrations (1000 mg/L) are found in some geographic locations.

6. Conductivity:

Pure water is not a good conductor of electric current rather’s a good insulator. Increase in ions concentration enhances the electrical conductivity of water. Generally, the amount of dissolved solids in water determines the electrical conductivity. Electrical conductivity (EC) actually measures the ionic process of a solution that enables it to transmit current. According to WHO standards, EC value should not exceeded 400 μS/cm.

7. Organic_carbon:

Total Organic Carbon (TOC) in source waters comes from decaying natural organic matter (NOM) as well as synthetic sources. TOC is a measure of the total amount of carbon in organic compounds in pure water. According to US EPA < 2 mg/L as TOC in treated / drinking water, and < 4 mg/Lit in source water which is use for treatment.

8. Trihalomethanes:

THMs are chemicals which may be found in water treated with chlorine. The concentration of THMs in drinking water varies according to the level of organic material in the water, the amount of chlorine required to treat the water, and the temperature of the water that is being treated. THM levels up to 80 ppm is considered safe in drinking water.

9. Turbidity:

The turbidity of water depends on the quantity of solid matter present in the suspended state. It is a measure of light emitting properties of water and the test is used to indicate the quality of waste discharge with respect to colloidal matter. The mean turbidity value obtained for Wondo Genet Campus (0.98 NTU) is lower than the WHO recommended value of 5.00 NTU.

Analysis of ‘Drinking_Water_Potability’ provided by Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai), based on source dataset retrieved from https://www.kaggle.com/artimule/drinking-water-probability on 28 January 2022.

--- Dataset description provided by original source is as follows ---

Context Access to safe drinking water is essential to health, a basic human right, and a component of effective policy for health protection. This is important as a health and development issue at a national, regional, and local level. In some regions, it has been shown that investments in water supply and sanitation can yield a net economic benefit, since the reductions in adverse health effects and health care costs outweigh the costs of undertaking the interventions.

Content The drinking_water_potability.csv file contains water quality metrics for 3276 different water bodies.

1. pH value: PH is an important parameter in evaluating the acid-base balance of water. It is also the indicator of the acidic or alkaline condition of water status. WHO has recommended the maximum permissible limit of pH from 6.5 to 8.5. The current investigation ranges were 6.52–6.83 which are in the range of WHO standards.

2. Hardness: Hardness is mainly caused by calcium and magnesium salts. These salts are dissolved from geologic deposits through which water travels. The length of time water is in contact with hardness-producing material helps determine how much hardness there is in raw water. Hardness was originally defined as the capacity of water to precipitate soap caused by Calcium and Magnesium.

3. Solids (Total dissolved solids - TDS): Water has the ability to dissolve a wide range of inorganic and some organic minerals or salts such as potassium, calcium, sodium, bicarbonates, chlorides, magnesium, sulfates, etc. These minerals produced an unwanted taste and diluted color in the appearance of water. This is the important parameter for the use of water. The water with a high TDS value indicates that water is highly mineralized. The desirable limit for TDS is 500 mg/l and the maximum limit is 1000 mg/l which is prescribed for drinking purposes.

4. Chloramines: Chlorine and chloramine are the major disinfectants used in public water systems. Chloramines are most commonly formed when ammonia is added to chlorine to treat drinking water. Chlorine levels up to 4 milligrams per liter (mg/L or 4 parts per million (ppm)) are considered safe in drinking water.

5. Sulfate: Sulfates are naturally occurring substances that are found in minerals, soil, and rocks. They are present in ambient air, groundwater, plants, and food. The principal commercial use of sulfate is in the chemical industry. Sulfate concentration in seawater is about 2,700 milligrams per liter (mg/L). It ranges from 3 to 30 mg/L in most freshwater supplies, although much higher concentrations (1000 mg/L) are found in some geographic locations.

6. Conductivity: Pure water is not a good conductor of electric current rather’s a good insulator. An increase in ions concentration enhances the electrical conductivity of water. Generally, the amount of dissolved solids in water determines electrical conductivity. Electrical conductivity (EC) actually measures the ionic process of a solution that enables it to transmit current. According to WHO standards, EC value should not exceed 400 μS/cm.

7. Organic_carbon: Total Organic Carbon (TOC) in source waters comes from decaying natural organic matter (NOM) as well as synthetic sources. TOC is a measure of the total amount of carbon in organic compounds in pure water. According to US EPA < 2 mg/L as TOC in treated / drinking water, and < 4 mg/Lit in source water which is use for treatment.

8. Trihalomethanes: THMs are chemicals that may be found in water treated with chlorine. The concentration of THMs in drinking water varies according to the level of organic material in the water, the amount of chlorine required to treat the water, and the temperature of the water that is being treated. THM levels up to 80 ppm are considered safe in drinking water.

9. Turbidity: The turbidity of water depends on the quantity of solid matter present in the suspended state. It is a measure of the light-emitting properties of water and the test is used to indicate the quality of waste discharge with respect to the colloidal matter. The mean turbidity value obtained for Wondo Genet Campus (0.98 NTU) is lower than the WHO recommended value of 5.00 NTU.

10. Potability: Indicates if water is safe for human consumption where 1 means Potable and 0 means Not potable.

Inspiration Contaminated water and poor sanitation are linked to the transmission of diseases such as cholera, diarrhea, dysentery, hepatitis A, typhoid, and polio. Absent, inadequate, or inappropriately managed water and sanitation services expose individuals to preventable health risks. This is particularly the case in health care facilities where both patients and staff are placed at additional risk of infection and disease when water, sanitation, and hygiene services are lacking.

--- Original source retains full ownership of the source dataset ---

This study presents the first large-scale assessment of cyanobacterial frequency and abundance at surface drinking water intakes across the United States. Public water systems serve drinking water to nearly 90% of the United States population. Cyanobacteria and their toxins may degrade the quality of finished drinking water and can lead to negative health consequences. Satellite imagery can serve as a cost-effective and consistent monitoring technique for surface cyanobacterial blooms in source waters and can provide drinking water treatment operators information for managing their systems. This study uses satellite imagery from the European Space Agency’s Ocean and Land Colour Instrument (OLCI) spanning June 2016 through April 2020. At 300-m spatial resolution, OLCI imagery can be used to monitor cyanobacteria in 685 drinking water sources across 285 lakes in 44 states. First, a subset of satellite data was compared to a subset of 99 responses submitted as part of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s fourth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 4). These UCMR 4 quantitative responses included visual observations of algal bloom presence and absence near drinking water intakes from March 2018 through November 2019. Overall agreement between satellite imagery and UCMR 4 qualitative responses was high at over 94% with a Kappa coefficient of 0.70. Next, temporal frequency of cyanobacterial blooms at all resolvable drinking water sources was assessed. In 2019, bloom frequency averaged 2% and peaked at 100%, where 100% indicated a bloom was always present at the source waters when satellite imagery was available. Monthly cyanobacterial abundances were used to assess short-term trends across all resolvable drinking water sources. Generally, 2016-2020 was an insufficient time period for observing changes at these source waters; On average, a decade of data would be required for observed trends to outweigh variability in the data. However, five source waters did demonstrate a sustained short-term trend, with one increasing in cyanobacterial abundance from June 2016 to April 2020 and four decreasing. This dataset is not publicly accessible because: EPA cannot release personally identifiable information regarding living individuals, according to the Privacy Act and the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). This dataset contains information about human research subjects. Because there is potential to identify individual participants and disclose personal information, either alone or in combination with other datasets, individual level data are not appropriate to post for public access. Restricted access may be granted to authorized persons by contacting the party listed. It can be accessed through the following means: Katherine Foreman, Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water. Format: Assessing temporal frequency of cyanobacterial blooms at drining water intakes using imagery from the Sentinel-3A satellite sensor.

This dataset is associated with the following publication: Coffer, M., B. Schaeffer, K. Foreman, A. Porteous, K.A. Loftin, R.P. Stumpf, P.J. Werdell, E. Urquhart, R. Albert, and J. Darling. Assessing cyanobacterial frequency and abundance at surface waters near drinking water intakes across the United States. WATER RESEARCH. Elsevier Science Ltd, New York, NY, USA, 201: 117377, (2021).

Snapshot img

Portable Water Purifier Market Size 2024-2028

The portable water purifier market size is forecast to increase by USD 202.8 billion at a CAGR of 12.32% between 2023 and 2028. The market is experiencing significant growth due to the increasing concerns over water pollution and the resulting health risks, particularly in tropical regions where water-borne diseases are prevalent. Toxins and contaminants in water sources pose a threat to public health, leading to the demand for effective water purification solutions. Climate change and its impact on water resources further exacerbate the issue. Portable water purifiers offer a convenient and efficient solution for individuals and families to ensure safe residential drinking water, especially in areas with limited access to clean water. However, concerns over the safety and effectiveness of these devices have emerged, leading to a growing trend towards online sales to ensure authenticity and quality. The market is expected to continue its growth trajectory, driven by the need for clean water and the increasing awareness of the health risks associated with contaminated water sources.

Request Free Sample

The demand for portable water purifiers is on the rise as the importance of clean drinking water becomes increasingly recognized in various sectors. Waterborne diseases, water-related disasters, and health risks associated with untreated sources have fueled the need for reliable water purification solutions. Portable water purifiers play a crucial role in providing safe drinking water in disaster-prone areas and for individuals in military personnel, campers, and hikers. These devices offer a convenient and efficient way to treat water from untreated sources, ensuring the elimination of pathogens, suspended solids, and toxic compounds.

Water quality is a significant concern for residential areas, particularly in regions with low standard of living. Portable water purifiers offer a cost-effective and accessible solution for these communities, reducing the risk of water-related diseases and improving overall health and wellness. Industrial waste and wastewater treatment are also major contributors to water contamination. Portable water purifiers can be used to treat industrial wastewater, ensuring that the water is safe for reuse or disposal. UV technology is a popular choice for portable water purifiers due to its effectiveness in eliminating pathogens. RO (Reverse Osmosis) and gravity purifiers are also widely used, with the former offering advanced filtration capabilities and the latter providing a simple and cost-effective solution.

Pitcher filters and filtration processes are other types of water purification devices that have gained popularity in recent years. These devices use a filtration process to remove suspended solids and other impurities, providing clean drinking water for individuals and families. Water-related diseases, such as cholera and typhoid fever, pose a significant health risk to individuals in both developed and developing countries. Portable water purifiers offer a reliable and convenient solution for addressing these health risks, ensuring that individuals have access to safe drinking water at all times. Water-related disasters, such as floods and hurricanes, can contaminate large quantities of water, making it unsafe for consumption.

Portable water purifiers can be used to treat contaminated water on-site, providing individuals with a source of clean drinking water during these emergencies. In conclusion, portable water purifiers offer a versatile and effective solution for addressing the need for safe drinking water in various sectors. From disaster-prone areas to industrial wastewater treatment, these devices provide a convenient and efficient way to eliminate pathogens, suspended solids, and toxic compounds, ensuring that individuals have access to clean and safe drinking water.

Market Segmentation

The market research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD million' for the period 2024-2028, as well as historical data from 2018-2022 for the following segments.

Product

  Extrusion water purifier
  Pump water purifier
  Suction water purifier
  UV pen purifier


Application

  Outdoor adventure
  Tourism and leisure
  Military
  Emergency rescue
  Others


Geography

  North America

    US


  Europe

    Germany
    UK
    France


  APAC

    China


  South America



  Middle East and Africa

By Product Insights

The extrusion water purifier segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.The market encompasses various types of water filtration systems, including gravity filters and ultraviolet purifiers. These technologies play a crucial role in removing biological impurities from residential drinking water, thereby mitigating the risk

Over the past five years, water supply and irrigation systems companies have experienced modest growth, primarily driven by increased water prices due to scarcity. Prolonged droughts in regions like Texas, California, and Arizona have heightened dependence on surface water, escalating demand and prices. While the residential construction sector struggled with high interest rates in recent years, 2024 has seen these rates lowered, setting up a revival in demand from the residential segment. Meanwhile, growth in the commercial market has been constrained due to increased remote and hybrid work, keeping office rental vacancies high and impacting water consumption. Overall, industry revenue has grown at a CAGR of 3.7% over the past five years, reaching an estimated $121.5 billion after a 0.7% increase in 2025. Despite rising revenues, profit has been greatly challenged as industry players strive to comply with stringent government regulations. The introduction of the EPA's national drinking water standards for PFAS and lead mandates extensive infrastructure upgrades, increasing operational costs. However, government funding, such as the $1 billion allocated for PFAS testing and treatment, offers support to mitigate these financial challenges. The US water supply system has seen increased privatization in recent years, with private companies purchasing rights to operate public utilities and upgrading aging infrastructure. Additionally, consolidation is ongoing as larger public utility companies acquire smaller, less efficient distribution systems. The much-needed investment in these systems has raised investment needs, causing more profit declines. The water supply and irrigation systems industry is on track to expand in the future period. This growth will be fueled by ongoing privatization efforts and consolidation within the sector. The persistent issues of climate change, water shortages, conservation needs and aging infrastructure will increase demand and prices and prompt significant improvement projects for water systems. Anticipated rises in housing starts will futher support demand for water supplies. Overall, revenue is forecast to grow at a CAGR of 0.2% to $123.0 billion through the end of 2030.