Following each census, Detroit City Council is required by the 2012 Detroit City Charter to redraw the boundaries of the City's seven non at-large districts to be "as nearly of equal population as practicable, contiguous, compact and in accordance with any other criteria permitted by law" (Sec. 3-108). After considering six district boundary proposals meant to meet these criteria, City Council selected the boundaries described in this document by an 8-1 vote on February 6, 2024. These boundaries will be used to determine resident districts when voting in 2025 municipal elections, and will officially take effect January 1, 2026.

This map contains the City of Laredo council districts, City Limits and Webb County Voting Precincts. For questions about Voting Precincts, please contact the Webb County Elections office. For information on City Elections please contact the City Secretary of the City of Laredo. Current City Council Districts took effect August 20th, 2022.

This data asset provides the geographic boundaries the City of Austin's City Council Districts, including detailed district shapes and associated geographic coordinates. It is essential for understanding political representation and local governance within the city. By offering this data, we empower city planners, policy analysts, community organizers, and businesses to make informed decisions related to electoral boundaries, public services, and district-level analysis. It also supports more effective civic engagement and resource allocation by helping stakeholders identify key areas of influence and need across the city's council districts.

Terms of Use This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey and represents only the approximate relative location of property boundaries. This product has been produced by the City of Austin for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness.

Historic Boundaries for City of Pittsburgh City Council Districts For more recent and current council district boundaries, see https://res1datad-o-twprdcd-o-torg.vcapture.xyz/dataset/resources/city-council-districts-2012

Historic Boundaries for City of Pittsburgh City Council Districts

For more recent and current council district boundaries, see https://data.wprdc.org/dataset/resources/city-council-districts-2012

Map Gallery for City Council Districts.
For raw GIS Data see City Council GIS Data

Dataset Summary About this data: City Council is the nine-member legislative body for the City of Rochester that works in conjunction with the Mayor's Office to pass laws and govern the city. City Council is comprised of five at-large members who represent the entire city and four district members who are the voice for the South, Northwest, East, and Northeast sections of the city. This map shows the district boundaries that applied until 2023. To access the NEW City Council Districts feature layer, please click HERE. For more information about City Council, please see this page of the City's website. Dictionary: District Name: Quadrant of the City of Rochester where the City Council District is located (Northwest, Northeast, Southwest, Southeast). Additional Information: The location of the office of the City Council representative. Contact Name: The name of the City Council representative for the district. Email: The email for the City Council representative. Phone: The phone number for the City Council representative. Source: This data comes from the City of Rochester.

Since 1978, voters have elected council members from among candidates living within their district, plus the mayor who is elected at large citywide. With the subsequent release of decennial census data by the US Census Bureau in the years 1980, 1990, 2000, and 2010, City Council District boundaries have been adjusted to meet legal requirements and San Jose's own redistricting criteria. The City Council District boundaries are updated every ten years.

Champaign City Council districts with name of current Council Member

This map layer represents the City Council Districts for the City of Bloomington, Indiana. Bloomington contains six representative council districts, numbered one (1) through six (6). Boundaries are set by City ordinance. Districts are based on voting precincts and the municipal boundary. Any additional area annexed by the city are placed in council districts defined by the annexation ordinance. District boundaries may be altered by council action but done rarely other than the redistricting process that follows the Decennial US Census.

Boundaries for Oregon's Councils of Governments. Note, this dataset does not include Portland Metro's boundary since Metro is not a COG, but a metropolitan service district.

Local Councils Units defining local councils extend and area (polygon format).

{{default.description}}

This dataset portrays the boundaries of the County Council Districts in Allegheny County. The dataset is based on municipal boundaries and City of Pittsburgh ward boundaries and was updated as the result of reapportionment in September 2002. It has also been attributed with the current representatives' names. If viewing this description on the Western Pennsylvania Regional Data Center’s open data portal (http://www.wprdc.org), this dataset is harvested on a weekly basis from Allegheny County’s GIS data portal (http://openac.alcogis.opendata.arcgis.com/). The full metadata record for this dataset can also be found on Allegheny County’s GIS portal. You can access the metadata record and other resources on the GIS portal by clicking on the “Explore” button (and choosing the “Go to resource” option) to the right of the “ArcGIS Open Dataset” text below. Category: Civic Vitality and Governance Organization: Allegheny County Department: Geographic Information Systems Group; Department of Administrative Services Temporal Coverage: 2002-present Data Notes: Coordinate System: Pennsylvania State Plane South Zone 3702; U.S. Survey Foot Development Notes: none Other: none Related Document(s): Data Dictionary (none) Frequency - Data Change: As needed Frequency - Publishing: As needed Data Steward Name: Eli Thomas Data Steward Email: gishelp@alleghenycounty.us

Updated December 2013. LA City Council Districts as adopted by Final Ordinance 2012 No. 182168.

Note: This council district layer goes into effect on January 1, 2026. The council district layer in effect until December 31st, 2025 can be found hereThis Council Districts map is for illustrative purposes only and the City of Detroit makes no representations as to its accuracy. For the official geographic boundaries, please refer to the geographical boundaries formally approved by the Detroit City Council on February 6, 2024. For convenience, a link to the formally approved boundaries may be found here. The reapportioned City Council District boundaries take effect on January 1, 2026.Following each census, Detroit City Council is required by the 2012 Detroit City Charter to redraw the boundaries of the City's seven non at-large districts to be "as nearly of equal population as practicable, contiguous, compact and in accordance with any other criteria permitted by law" (Sec. 3-108).City Council selected the boundaries illustrated here by an 8-1 vote on February 6, 2024. These boundaries will be used to determine resident districts when voting in 2025 municipal elections, and will officially take effect January 1, 2026.

Connecticut’s planning regions provide a geographic framework within which municipalities can jointly address common interests, and coordinate such interests with state plans and programs. State statutes authorize the secretary of the Office of Policy and Management (OPM) to designate or redesignate the boundaries of logical planning regions, whereas the member municipalities of each planning region are authorized under separate state statutes to establish a formal governance structure known as a regional council of governments (RCOG). The Office of Policy and Management (OPM) recently completed a comprehensive analysis of the boundaries of logical planning regions in Connecticut under Section 16a-4c of the Connecticut General Statutes (2014 Supplement). This analysis resulted in the number of planning regions being reduced from the original fifteen (15) to nine (9), as a result of four (4) voluntary consolidations and the elimination of two (2) planning regions.

Effective January 2024.More information: 2020 Worcester City Council District Lines are available at the Find My City Councilor application.Visit the School Committee Districts Finder application for help finding your elected School Committee officials.Visit the Geographic Information System (GIS) webpage for access to additional City maps.Informing Worcester is the City of Worcester's open data portal where interested parties can obtain public information at no cost.

This dataset covers the geographic are within the City of Raleigh municipal boundary. The Raleigh City Council dataset includes polygons which represent the boundaries for each City Council district. This dataset also includes labels and other data relating to each district and its representative. The Raleigh City Council is made up of two at-large representatives, five district representatives, and the Mayor. Each resident of Raleigh has one district representative, determined by the electoral district in which their residence falls. Part of a map service displaying administrative boundaries for Wake County and the City of Raleigh.Update Frequency: As NeededTime Period: Current

Web application for searching council districts by address.