In 2021, Austria was the country with the highest practicing physician density at 5.4 practicing physicians per thousand population. On the other hand, countries like India, South Africa, and Indonesia had less than one physician per 1,000 population, the lowest physician density among the selected countries.

Cuba was the country with the highest physician density, i.e. the number of physicians in relation to its population. There were 84 physicians per every 10,000 of Cuba's population, however, the most recent data was from 2018. Other countries with high physician density were mostly found in Europe.

Among OECD countries in 2022, South Korea had the highest rate of yearly visits to a doctor per capita. On average, people in South Korea visited the doctors 15.7 times per year in person. Health care utilization is an important indicator of the success of a country’s health care system. There are many factors that affect health care utilization including healthcare structure and the supply of health care providers.

OECD health systems

Healthcare systems globally include a variety of tools for accessing healthcare, including private insurance based systems, like in the U.S., and universal systems, like in the U.K. Health systems have varying costs among the OECD countries. Worldwide, Europe has the highest expenditures for health as a proportion of the GDP. Among all OECD countries, The United States had the highest share of government spending on health care. Recent estimates of current per capita health expenditures showed the United States also had, by far, the highest per capita spending on health worldwide.

Supply of health providers

Globally, the country with the highest physician density is Cuba, although most other countries with high number of physicians to population was found in Europe. The number of graduates of medicine impacts the number of available physicians in countries. Among OECD countries, Latvia had the highest rate of graduates of medicine, which was almost twice the rate of the OECD average.

Finland Population Per Medical Doctors Graduates was up 0.5% in 2019, from a year earlier.

In 2020, the density rate for medical doctors in Kuwait was 31.5 per 10,000 people, the highest in that year among the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. The regional average of the density of physicians in the GCC was higher than the world average.

In 2020, the density of medical doctors in conflict and risk countries in the Arab region was the highest for Libya at about 22 per ten thousand population, and the lowest for Somalia at 0.2 per ten thousand population. Although the COVID-19 cases in the region were low by international standards, the conflict and humanitarian crises which left more than 57 million people in need of humanitarian assistance even prior to the pandemic made them vulnerable to a greater threat.

As of 2019, the south Indian state of Kerala had the highest density of doctors of about 42 per ten thousand population in the country. However, Jharkhand had the least density of doctors in the country of about four doctors per ten thousand people in the state.

Ireland: Doctors per 1,000 people: The latest value from 2021 is 4.05 doctors per 1,000 people, an increase from 3.46 doctors per 1,000 people in 2020. In comparison, the world average is 3.93 doctors per 1,000 people, based on data from 12 countries. Historically, the average for Ireland from 2011 to 2021 is 3.16 doctors per 1,000 people. The minimum value, 2.67 doctors per 1,000 people, was reached in 2011 while the maximum of 4.05 doctors per 1,000 people was recorded in 2021.

The lack of medical services in West Africa represents a serious issue in sanitary emergency. As of April 2020, different West African countries counted less than a doctor every 10,000 inhabitants. Especially, Sierra Leone had three physicians per 100,000 individuals, the lowest density of medical doctors in West Africa. Moreover, Burkina Faso was estimated to have only 11 ventilators in the whole country for a population of almost 20 million people.

The average number of doctors across the OECD countries in 2019 equaled to 35 per 10,000 inhabitants. The member countries of OECD are mostly high-income countries, whereas Nigeria is an emerging economy and it belongs to countries with lower middle-incomes.

Among presented Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries, Slovakia had the highest number of oncologists per one million population, at 76 as of 2022. Hungary ranked second, with an oncology physician density of 74 per million population.

In 2021, there were approximately 2.56 doctors for every 1,000 inhabitants in South Korea. This was a slight increase compared to the preceding year. This ratio has increased steadily since 2000, with the exception of a slight drop in 2004. However, South Korea still has few doctors relative to its population. The OECD average was 3.3 doctors per 1,000 people, and among the full OECD member countries, only Mexico and Turkey had lower ratios. According to OECD data, key partners China, Brazil, India, South Africa, and Indonesia have ratios lower than Korea. At the other end of the spectrum is Austria with 5.48 doctors per 1,000 people, followed by Norway with 5.16 and Germany with 4.53. Shortage of medical staffs The Korean government officially declared a shortage of several thousand doctors across the nation and recommended the training of an additional 150 doctors every year to make up the shortfall. Furthermore, doctors of traditional Korean medicine are counted among the number of doctors, meaning there are even fewer doctors of modern medical sciences than official figures suggest. Yet there are several factors, such as resistance from doctors, preventing the government from simply increasing the number of medical graduates. Regional imbalances in the medical environmentSome experts refute the government’s claims that Korea faces a doctor shortage and point towards other factors. For example, Korea has a higher population density than other countries, meaning that the average Korean doctor meets with more patients than an Austrian or Norwegian one would. Indeed, half the population is concentrated in the Seoul Capital Area. Additionally, Koreans see doctors around 19 times a year on average, which is far more frequently than any other OECD nationals. Despite this, Korea spends a lower share of its GDP on medical expenditures than other OECD countries, implying that medical personnel do more work for less financial compensation. Regional disparities where doctors are concentrated in Seoul and other major cities is also an issue. The doctor-to-people ratio in Seoul is higher than the national ratio, and the same as the OECD average. Many argue that a shortage of nurses is a greater concern than an alleged shortage of doctors. While the number of trained nurses is adequate, many leave because of harsh working conditions.

Attitude towards the EU and EU enlargement.

Topics: life satisfaction; subjective rating of the development of the general life situation, the economic situation, the financial situation of the household, personal job situation, national labor market situation and the personal professional outlook in the coming year; native language; knowledge of foreign languages; frequency of political discussions with friends; self-rated opinion leadership; frequency of news consumption (television, newspaper and radio); interest in following news topics: local and national politics, social issues, EU, economics, sports, the environment, foreign politics, culture; spontaneous associations with the EU; general attitude towards the EU; knowledge of international institutions and trust into these institutions: UN, UNESCO, NATO, EU, European Parliament, European Commission, OSCE, Council of Europe, European Court of Human Rights, International Court of Justice; Self-rated knowledge about the EU (scale); awareness of application for EU membership by own country; accession to EU of own country as a good thing; approval of EU membership of own country if a referendum was held; advantageousness of EU accession for the own country, the own person and following groups: people with and without foreign language skills, entrepreneurs, politicians, professionals such as doctors or lawyers, young people, children, employees, industrial workers, medium-sized businesses, teachers, civil servants, middle-aged people, farmers, the rural population, the unemployed, pensioners, elderly, population of the capital, cultural, religious and other minorities; some regions benefit more than others, all population groups; agreement with the following statements: accession of the own country would be beneficial for the EU, increasing size of EU increases security and peace, would promote the national economy, increase the influence of the own country in Europe, satisfaction of the national government accession policy, increasing influence of the EU in the world if number of members increases, historical and geographical legitimacy of EU membership of the country, increased cultural wealth and standard of living, rising unemployment due to EU enlargement; expected and desired EU accession year of the own country; consent to possible EU accession of Bulgaria, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia and Turkey; EU or own country as preferred decision-making authority for the following policies: defense, environmental protection, currency, Humanitarian Aid, health and welfare, broadcasting and press, poverty reduction, combating unemployment, agriculture and fisheries, regional compensation, education, science and technology, information on EU , non-European foreign policy, culture, immigration, asylum, fighting against organized crime, police, justice, refugee resettlement, combat of youth delinquency, urban crime and human trafficking, the fight against drugs; preferred source of information about the EU; desire for additional information on the following topics: history of the EU, the EU institutions, European Economic and Monetary Union, Euro, European economy, European single market, further financial / economic issues, agriculture in the EU, European Foreign and Security Policy, international relations of the EU; regional policy of the EU, the European budget, European research and development policy, education policy, cultural policy, youth policy, EU citizenship, consumer protection and environmental protection in the EU, European social policy.

Demography: nationality; family situation; age at end of education; gender; age; occupation; professional position; degree of urbanization; household size; possession of durable goods, role of respondent in the household: main breadwinner, responsible for purchases and household maintenance, religious affiliation, frequency of church attendance, household income

In 2023, there were almost 52 doctors per 10,000 population in Russia. The density of doctors in the country has gradually increased in recent years after a decline in 2015, when the figure fell to around 46 medical professionals per 10,000 residents. How many doctors work in Russia? The number of doctors in the country grew by 85,800 between 2015 and 2023. In total, approximately 759,000 physicians were employed in healthcare in Russia during that year. Over 567,000 medical doctors worked in the public sector, including educational, scientific, cultural, healthcare, and social services organizations, in 2022. Importance of doctors’ density during COVID-19 During the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, countries with a low density of physicians have been suffering from limited healthcare resources and unequal access to medical assistance, as highlighted by the International Labor Organization Department of Statistics (Ilostat). Russia is the only non-high-income country among those with the highest doctors’ density worldwide. There were five infectious disease specialists per 100,000 inhabitants in the country as of April 2020.

Abstract: Medical teleconsultation can apply different technologies to mediate the communication between doctors and patients located in different geographic spaces. Its implementation has been encouraged in several countries, under the assumption of its potential to overcome distances, offering health care in a shorter time, reducing costs and workload. The scarcity of evidence about these allegations, in addition to the need of clarifying the situations in which teleconsultation can be adequate, safe and effective, have generated debates, intensified after the publication of Resolution N. 2.227/2018 by the Federal Council of Medicine, which allowed medical teleconsultation, containing principles and recommendations. This article aims to analyze the international experience of medical teleconsultation, including the media and technologies employed, their use, benefits and limitations, highlighting and associating the controversial points of the resolution recently published by the Federal Council of Medicine. An integrative review of the literature was carried out to identify these experiences from January 2013 to February 2019. Of the 1912 identified references, 42 were analyzed after applying the exclusion and inclusion criteria. Data collection and analysis indicated that telephone, e-mail, e-consulting systems, video or a combination of those have been used in several countries to mediate the doctor-patient relationship. Its use goes ranges from diagnosis to treatment, monitoring, management and prescription, both in acute and chronic conditions. The main benefits include less demand for face-to-face consultations, with the possibility of doctors’ workload management, allowing systems’ reorganization. Moreover, the teleconsultation allows overcoming distance barriers, in a flexible and convenient way for patients, possibly contributing to continuity of care, patient autonomy and resource savings, in the latter case, when it avoids work absenteeism due to face-to-face consultation. Some limitations of the teleconsultation include the inability to perform the physical examination, so it is not recommended for the first consultation. Technical and communication difficulties for each media, as well as its inadequacy for some groups of patients, are other important barriers. Data security regarding diagnosis and clinical precision, patients’ and professionals’ acceptance and the need for organizational adjustments are also considered limitations of the teleconsultation. The success of the teleconsultation depends on the integration of different organizations and professionals, aiming to maximize its potential and improve service design, encompassing clinical, technical, organizational and context issues. Therefore, it is important to investigate in which contexts, situations and conditions the teleconsultation can be beneficial, safe and effective for patient care, as well as the most appropriate means of communication.

Snapshot img

Concierge Medicine Market Size 2025-2029

The concierge medicine market size is forecast to increase by USD 8.86 billion at a CAGR of 7.5% between 2024 and 2029.

The market is experiencing significant growth, driven by the increasing prevalence of chronic diseases, particularly Cardiovascular Diseases (CVD), and the integration of advanced technologies to enhance patient care. This market is projected to offer substantial opportunities for stakeholders, as personalized healthcare services continue to gain popularity. However, challenges persist, particularly in developing countries where accessibility and affordability remain major barriers. The integration of telemedicine, electronic health records, and artificial intelligence into concierge medicine is revolutionizing the industry, enabling healthcare providers to offer more efficient and effective services. Companies seeking to capitalize on this market's potential must focus on delivering personalized, technology-driven healthcare solutions while addressing the affordability and accessibility challenges in underserved regions. Strategic partnerships, collaborations, and investments in emerging technologies can help companies navigate these challenges and capitalize on the market's growth opportunities.

What will be the Size of the Concierge Medicine Market during the forecast period?

Request Free SampleThe market represents a growing segment withIn the healthcare industry, offering customized, round-the-clock care to patients in exchange for retainer fees. This model, also known as retainer-based medicine or boutique medicine, prioritizes ease of access, personalized attention, and tailored services. The market caters to various demographics, including the elderly population and individuals with chronic diseases. Healthcare providers offering concierge medicine services aim to address the physician shortage and improve work-life balance, while ensuring career satisfaction. These providers offer ease of access to healthcare consultation services, including specialist consultations and care while traveling. Healthcare insurance firms are increasingly recognizing the value of concierge medicine, as it can lead to improved patient volume and better care management for those with complex health conditions. The market's growth is driven by the increasing prevalence of chronic diseases and the desire for more personalized, convenient healthcare services. Female doctors are also entering the market, addressing the gender imbalance in healthcare and offering patients a more diverse range of healthcare professionals to choose from. The market's overall size and direction reflect a growing trend towards customized, convenient healthcare solutions that cater to individual patient needs.

How is this Concierge Medicine Industry segmented?

The concierge medicine industry research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD billion' for the period 2025-2029, as well as historical data from 2019-2023 for the following segments. ApplicationPrimary carePediatricCardiologyInternal medicineOthersOwnershipGroupStandaloneGeographyNorth AmericaUSCanadaEuropeFranceGermanyItalyUKAsiaRest of World (ROW)

By Application Insights

The primary care segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.The market's primary care segment is witnessing notable growth due to the escalating demand for customized healthcare services. Known as retainer-based or boutique medicine, this approach allows patients to access their primary care physicians more easily through membership or annual fees. This model enables more personalized care, extended consultation times, and improved patient satisfaction. In 2024, the primary care segment led the market, driven by the rising need for continuous, comprehensive care, particularly among individuals with chronic diseases and those prioritizing preventive measures. Concierge medicine encompasses various services, including specialist consultations, lab tests, osteopathic treatment, coordination of care, and internal medicine. It caters to diverse patient populations, including the elderly and female doctors, and offers financial stability for healthcare providers amidst income reduction and physician shortages. The subscription model, which includes membership fees, direct billing, and patient access, has gained traction due to its premium care delivery and convenience.

Get a glance at the market report of share of various segments Request Free Sample

The Primary care segment was valued at USD 4.82 billion in 2019 and showed a gradual increase during the forecast period.

Regional Analysis

North America is estimated to contribute 42% to the growth of the global market during the forecast period.Technavio’s analysts have elaborately explained the regional trends and driver

The International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) is a continuous programme of cross-national collaboration running annual surveys on topics important for the social sciences. The programme started in 1984 with four founding members - Australia, Germany, Great Britain, and the United States – and has now grown to almost 50 member countries from all over the world. As the surveys are designed for replication, they can be used for both, cross-national and cross-time comparisons. Each ISSP module focuses on a specific topic, which is repeated in regular time intervals. Please, consult the documentation for details on how the national ISSP surveys are fielded. The present study focuses on questions about individual health and the health care system.
Satisfaction with life (happiness); confidence in the educational system and the health system of the country; changes of health care system is needed; justification of better medical supply and better education for people with higher incomes; assessment of the health care system of the country (scale: estimation of improvement of the health care system, usage of health care services more than necessary, government should provide only basic health care services, inefficient health care system); willingness to pay higher taxes to improve the level of health care for all people in the country; attitude towards public funding of: preventive medical checkups, treatment of HIV/AIDS, programs to prevent obesity and conduct organ transplants; attitude towards the access to publicly funded health care for people without citizenship of the country and even if they behave in ways that damage their health; estimated part of people without access to the health care system; causes of severe health problems (behavior that damages health, environment, genes, poverty); evaluation of patients for smoking habits, age and the presence of young children for a needed heart operation; attitude towards alternative (traditional or folk) medicine (provides better solutions for health problems than conventional medicine, promises more than it is able to deliver); assessment of doctors in general in the country (scale: doctors can be trusted, discuss all treatment options with their patients, poor medical skills, more care about their earnings than about their patients, openness in dealing with mistakes during treatment); frequency of difficulties with work or household activities because of health problems, bodily aches or pains, unhappiness and depression, loss of self-confidence and insuperable problems in the past four weeks; frequency of doctor visits and of visiting an alternative (traditional/folk) health care practitioner during the past twelve months; stay in hospital or a clinic as an in-patient overnight during the last year; reasons why the respondent did not receive needed medical treatment (could not pay for it, could not take the time off work or because of other commitments, needed treatment was not available at the place of residence, too long waiting list); likelihood of getting the best treatment available in the country in the case of seriously illness and of treatment from the doctor of own choice; satisfaction with the health care system in the country; satisfaction with treatment at the last visit to a doctor, when attending alternative health care practitioner and with the last hospital stay; number of smoked cigarettes per day; frequency of drinking four or more alcoholic drinks on the same day, strenuous physical activity and of eating fresh fruit or vegetables; assessment of personal health; respondent has a long-standing illness, a chronic condition or a disability; height and weight of respondent; kind of personal health insurance; only respondents with health insurance: assessment of personal health insurance coverage.

Optional items: personal health insurance covers the prescribed drugs, dental health care and in-patient health care in hospital; need of a referral from the family doctor before visiting a medical specialist; limitation of social activities with family or friends because of health problems.

Demography: Sex; age; year of birth; years in school; education (country specific); highest completed degree; work status; hours worked weekly; employment relationship; number of employees; supervision of employees; number of supervised employees; type of organization: for-profit vs. non profit and public vs. private; occupation (ISCO-88); main employment status; living in steady partnership; union membership; religious affiliation or denomination (country specific); groups of religious denominations; attendance of religious services; top-bottom self-placement; vote in last general election; country specific party voted in last general election; party voted (left-right); ethnicity (country specific); number of children; number of toddlers; size of household; earnings of respondent (country specific); family income (country specific); marital status;...

In Mexico, the number of practicing doctors amounted to around 2.51 professionals per 1,000 inhabitants in 2021, an increase compared to the figures reported a year earlier when there were around 2.41 practicing physicians per every thousand people. During the last year depicted, the number of physicians in Mexico totaled approximately 324,000 professionals.

Density of doctors worldwide

In a global comparison, Mexico ranks in an middle category for density of medical doctors per 1,000 population, similar to Japan and Qatar. Among the countries in the upper bracket for highest density of doctors are Cuba, Georgia, Lithuania, and Greece. Along with Mexico’s moderate density of doctors, over 39 percent of the population was considered vulnerable due to lack of access to health services in Mexico as of 2022, up from around 21.5 percent a decade earlier.

Health care in Mexico

Nearly 33 million people in Mexico held public health insurance through Seguro Popular in 2020, which was replaced by a new institution at the beginning of that year, called INSABI (Instituto Nacional de Salud para el Bienestar). However, the IMSS (Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social) led by a large margin as the largest provider of health insurance in the North American country.

Objectives The prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in developing countries has increased dramatically. This study aimed to explore the practice patterns of non-dialysis-dependent CKD care in an affluent developing country. Settings Primary and specialised healthcare facilities of public and private sectors in the United Arab Emirates. Participants 159 non-nephrologist physicians practising in the United Arab Emirates. Interventions A 28-item online self-administered questionnaire based on CKD clinical practice guidelines. Primary and secondary outcome measures The physicians' approach to identifying and managing patients with CKD. Results The survey was completed by 159 non-nephrologists, of whom 135 reported having treated patients with CKD. Almost all the respondents screen patients with hypertension and diabetes for CKD, but one-third of them do not screen patients with cardiovascular disease and elderly patients for CKD. The use of accurate CKD screening tests (estimated glomerular filtration rate and albumin/creatinine ratio) was suboptimal (77% and 59% of physicians used the procedures, respectively). One-third of the physicians do not offer treatment with inhibitors of the renin–angiotensin system to patients with CKD, and only 66% offer antilipid treatment. In general, the primary healthcare physicians are more familiar than secondary healthcare physicians with the diagnosis and management of patients with CKD. Conclusions We identified substantial physician-declared deficiencies in the practice of identifying and managing early CKD. Integration of quality CKD care within the healthcare system is required to face the increasing burden of CKD in the United Arab Emirates and possibly in other developing nations.

Series Name: Health worker density by type of occupation (per 10 000 population)Series Code: SH_MED_HEAWORRelease Version: 2020.Q2.G.03 This dataset is the part of the Global SDG Indicator Database compiled through the UN System in preparation for the Secretary-General's annual report on Progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals.Indicator 3.c.1: Health worker density and distributionTarget 3.c: Substantially increase health financing and the recruitment, development, training and retention of the health workforce in developing countries, especially in least developed countries and small island developing StatesGoal 3: Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all agesFor more information on the compilation methodology of this dataset, see https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/

Health facilities in the public and private sector in South Africa.