This polygon dataset is the official Zoning map of Buncombe County. Zoning is the classification of land into districts, with each district placing restrictions and regulations on the type of uses and development allowed in the district. This dataset only includes County zoning, and does not include any zoning within incorporated municipalities such as within the City of Asheville or Town of Weaverville. For information about zoning inside of a city or town, please contact those municipalities directly. For more information http://gisdownload.buncombecounty.org/County_Zoning.htm

This Zoning feature class is an element of the Oregon GIS Framework statewide, Zoning spatial data. This version is authorized for public use. Attributes include zoning districts that have been generalized to state classes. As of June 30, 2023, this feature class contains zoning data from 229 local jurisdictions. DLCD plans to continue adding to and updating this statewide zoning dataset as they receive zoning information from the local jurisdictions. Jurisdictions included in the latest version of the statewide zoning geodatabase: Cities: Adams, Adrian, Albany, Amity, Antelope, Ashland, Astoria, Athena, Aurora, Banks, Barlow, Bay City, Beaverton, Bend, Boardman, Bonanza, Brookings, Brownsville, Burns, Butte Falls, Canby, Cannon Beach, Carlton, Cascade Locks, Cave Junction, Central Point, Chiloquin, Coburg, Columbia City, Coos Bay, Cornelius, Corvallis, Cottage Grove, Creswell, Culver, Dayton, Detroit, Donald, Drain, Dufur, Dundee, Dunes City, Durham, Eagle Point, Echo, Enterprise, Estacada, Eugene, Fairview, Falls City, Florence, Forest Grove, Fossil, Garibaldi, Gaston, Gates, Gearhart, Gervais, Gladstone, Gold Beach, Gold Hill, Grants Pass, Grass Valley, Gresham, Halsey, Happy Valley, Harrisburg, Helix, Hermiston, Hillsboro, Hines, Hood River, Hubbard, Idanha, Independence, Jacksonville, Jefferson, Johnson City, Jordan Valley, Junction City, Keizer, King City, Klamath Falls, La Grande, La Pine, Lafayette, Lake Oswego, Lebanon, Lincoln City, Lowell, Lyons, Madras, Malin, Manzanita, Maupin, Maywood Park, McMinnville, Medford, Merrill, Metolius, Mill City, Millersburg, Milton-Freewater, Milwaukie, Mitchell, Molalla, Monmouth, Moro, Mosier, Mount Angel, Myrtle Creek, Myrtle Point, Nehalem, Newberg, Newport, North Bend, North Plains, Nyssa, Oakridge, Ontario, Oregon City, Pendleton, Philomath, Phoenix, Pilot Rock, Port Orford, Portland, Prescott, Prineville, Rainier, Redmond, Reedsport, Rivergrove, Rockaway Beach, Rogue River, Roseburg, Rufus, Saint Helens, Salem, Sandy, Scappoose, Scio, Scotts Mills, Seaside, Shady Cove, Shaniko, Sheridan, Sherwood, Silverton, Sisters, Sodaville, Spray, Springfield, Stanfield, Stayton, Sublimity, Sutherlin, Sweet Home, Talent, Tangent, The Dalles, Tigard, Tillamook, Toledo, Troutdale, Tualatin, Turner, Ukiah, Umatilla, Vale, Veneta, Vernonia, Warrenton, Wasco, Waterloo, West Linn, Westfir, Weston, Wheeler, Willamina, Wilsonville, Winston, Wood Village, Woodburn, Yamhill. Counties: Baker County, Benton County, Clackamas County, Clatsop County, Columbia County, Coos County, Crook County, Curry County, Deschutes County, Douglas County, Harney County, Hood River County, Jackson County, Jefferson County, Josephine County, Klamath County, Lane County, Lincoln County, Linn County, Malheur County, Marion County, Multnomah County, Polk County, Sherman County, Tillamook County, Umatilla County, Union County, Wasco County, Washington County, Wheeler County, Yamhill County. R emaining jurisdictions either chose not to share data to incorporate into the public, statewide dataset or did not respond to DLCD’s request for data. These jurisdictions’ attributes are designated “not shared” in the orZDesc field and “NS” in the orZCode field.

This data identifies current as well as proposed zoning and land use designations that are adopted by ordinances for unincorporated Pierce County. Zoning for cities is not included in this dataset. Zones are adopted by ordinances with specific technicalities for each community. Land Use designations offer a broad spectrum of allowable uses within a community. It is used to create a Comprehensive Plan Map or used for a Generalized Proposed Land Use Map or GPLUM. This dataset is also used to create the Land Use Designations theme, which covers proposed zoning use. The meaning of proposed is that the property might not be currently used for the purpose stated. It should be noted that Council adopted amendments to land use designations/zoning that will be effective at the beginning of 2006. Also, the Council is in the process of adopting the Mid-County Community Plan which amends land use designations/zoning as well. The Cities polygons found in the zoning data does not necessarily match the current cities boundaries. This is because the zoning data is updated once a year per the "Pierce County Comprehensive Plan" and does not allow for changes to be made during the year. The Comprehensive Plan is generally updated in November and generally becomes effective the following March. Use the "Cities in Pierce County" data set to determine current city boundaries. City boundaries can change more often than the current adopted Pierce County Zoning data. The zoning data contains the "Cities in Pierce County" boundaries at the time that the Pierce County Zoning was adopted. When determining the current zoning of a parcel near a city, the current "Cities in Pierce County" data set needs to be reviewed. Zoning codes for parcels within incorporated cities are determined by the city that the parcel is within. Please read metadata for additional information (https://matterhorn.piercecountywa.gov/GISmetadata/pdbplan_zoning.html). Any use or data download constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use (https://matterhorn.piercecountywa.gov/disclaimer/PierceCountyGISDataTermsofUse.pdf).

Zoning boundaries for unincorporated King County; WA. Created layers using parcels, cities, and legal descriptions. This is the version with the cities clipped out. This is used for GISMO and by KCGIS. We have another version that is presently being maintained as coverage that includes city areas.

Zoning is a tool used to regulate the use of land in Kenosha County in a manner that serves to promote the general welfare of its citizens, the quality of the environment and the conservation of its resources. Zoning also implements a land use plan. Zoning in and of itself is the delineation of areas or zones into specific districts which provides uniform regulations and requirements that govern the use, placement, spacing, and size of land and buildings. The Kenosha County Department of Planning and Development, Division of County Development administers the zoning maps and the zoning ordinance for the unincorporated areas of Kenosha County, including the Towns of Brighton, Paris, Randall, Somers and Wheatland.The zoning districts are delineated on maps that have been adopted by the Kenosha County Board of Supervisors and the towns that partner in zoning.The regulations and requirements for zoning districts and land use are encompassed within an ordinance of which in Kenosha County is called the Kenosha County General Zoning and Shoreland/Floodplain Zoning Ordinance. This ordinance is also Chapter 12 of the Municipal Code of Kenosha County.This data is updated on an as-needed basis, as zoning changes are made.

*This layer is a work in progress*Oswego County began the process of digitizing zoning maps into digital geospatial data in 2022. Accuracy of these zones is not guaranteed due to the fact that this data is being digitized from paper maps. Zoning in Oswego County is handled at the local municipal level by Cities, Towns, and Villages and any questioning concerning zoning should be directed to the agency responsible for zoning in those communities, typically the Zoning Board or Code Enforcement Officer.

The purpose of developing parcel-referenced digital zoning dataset is to provide an accurate information about the zoning regulations and designations within Somerset County, New Jersey. The dataset depicts boundaries and attributes of different zoning districts, such as residential, commercial, industrial, agricultural, and mixed-use zones. By utilizing the GIS dataset, urban planners, developers, policymakers, and other stakeholders can visualize and analyze the spatial distribution of zoning regulations. It helps them understand the existing land-use patterns, identify suitable locations for various types of development, evaluate compliance with zoning regulations, and make informed decisions regarding land use planning, development proposals, and policy changes. Additionally, combining zoning data with other spatial datasets, such as transportation networks, population demographics, or environmental data, can provide valuable insights for comprehensive planning and decision-making processes.

Geospatial data about Alexander County, North Carolina County Zoning. Export to CAD, GIS, PDF, CSV and access via API.

This data layer represents a compilation of local zoning districts and is based on zoning information compiled and digitized from each of Westchester's 43 municipalities between 2011 and 2024. It is important to note that it is not an officially adopted map of local zoning, but rather a depiction - or "snapshot" - of local zoning at the time of compilation. As such, this data layer is intended to be used for general reference purposes only. Since local zoning is constantly subject to change, inquiries regarding current status of local zoning districts, zoning designations of specific parcels, and exact use and bulk requirements should be verified at the local level by contacting the local planning or municipal clerk’s office. Selected updates were completed for this data layer in 2015 and 2016 for the municipalities of Rye City, Town of North Castle, Village of Mamaroneck and Port Chester. Updates for the City of Mount Vernon were completed in April 2021. In 2022/2023 Westchester County conducted an outreach project to obtain updated data. The following municipalities were updated during this time: Ardsley, Dobbs Ferry, Greenburgh, Lewisboro, Mount Pleasant, North Salem, New Castle, Village of Ossining, and Peekskill. Updates for Briarcliff Manor and Buchanan were made in 2024. Buchanan has one overlay district which is an exception because no other polygons should be overlapping.

Geospatial data about Clermont County, Ohio Zoning. Export to CAD, GIS, PDF, CSV and access via API.

PDF. Zoning in unincorporated areas of St. Louis County, Missouri. Map scale is 1:62500. Link to metadata.

Geospatial data about Marion County, Florida Zoning Classification. Export to CAD, GIS, PDF, CSV and access via API.

Geospatial data about Kootenai County, Idaho Zoning. Export to CAD, GIS, PDF, CSV and access via API.

Spatially-complete zoning map of North Carolina, USA. The results folder contains results of a machine learning (random forest) model predicting 3 core district zones (residential, non-residential, and mixed use) and 13 sub-district zones (open space, industrial, commercial, office, planned use, high-density residential, medium-high-density residential, medium-density residential, medium-low-density residential, low-density residential, agricultural residential, mixed use, and downtown). Results are provided as 30-m rasters (.tif) with each value corresponding to a zoning district. Table containing zone district ID (number) and zone district name (character string) is included in zone_classification.csv. Final (spatially complete statewide maps) can be found in the final_predicted folder. This folder includes Statewide core district results in NC_predicted_core.tif and statewide sub-district results in NC_predicted_sub.tif.

Zoning was generalized and reclassified into 3 core district zones and 13 sub-district zones (described above). Reclassified zoning data, collected from 39 counties in North Carolina is provided in the observed folder with core districts in core_district_observed_zones.tif and sub-districts in sub_district_observed_zones.tif. Also in this folder is zoning_implementation_NC.csv which includes links to the source data (zoning map and zoning ordinance) for all collected data.

Two models were created to predict zones under different data availability scenarios (i.e., scenarios that assume different levels of data availability). Predictions labeled “within_county” utilized the within-county model which predicts zoning districts in areas where zoning data is partially available for that county. To approximate scenarios of incomplete data accessibility, 20% of the data was randomly removed from training and reserved for independent performance assessments. Predictions labeled “between-county” utilized the between-county model which predicts zoning districts in areas where zoning data is inaccessible. To approximate this scenario, multiple between-county model iterations were computed by randomly removing entire counties from the training dataset and computing performance metrics on the removed (test) counties. Predictions are provided for both core districts and sub-districts (described above). Results from these models can be found in the predicted folder. This folder contains four subfolders: core_district_within_county, sub_district_within_county, core_district_between_county, and sub_district_between_county. Within each of these folders are predicted maps 30-m raster (.tif), performance reports including precision, recall, and f1 score overall and per district (.csv), and accuracy maps (3-km grid shapefile [.shp, .shx, .prj, .dbf]) with values corresponding to the proportion of misclassified pixels within a grid cell. Multiple randomized testing county samples were conducted for the between-county models. Each random sample is labeled r*_ where * is replaced with a number between 1 and 15.

This feature layer contains a zoning layer for each of the 7 towns within Dukes County MA. Most of the data was compiled by the Martha's Vineyard Commission. Older data was created by MAPC staff during the Community Development Plan project in the early 2000s.See dataset's attribute table for last edit date. The date range for edits is wide: 2003 to 2024. The basemap of reference, in some cases (Tisbury) was the current GIS parcel boundary file at time of editing. The other towns seaward extent of zoning will not match the parcel data bounds since a different basemap was referenced at time of editing. The ZoneCode attribute contains the abbreviated zoning name for each district, preceded by the town's ID number.For Zoning Bylaws, see each Town's bylaws website: Aquinnah Chilmark Edgartown Gosnold Oak Bluffs Tisbury West Tisbury

This dataset represents the current zoning districts for the unincorporated parts of Fulton County, Georgia. Zoning is a device of land use planning commonly used by local governments. Through zoning, governments can define common permitted uses, building heights, setbacks and similar characteristics based on geographic zones or districts, thereby segregating land uses and building characteristics believed to incompatible.

For zoning with symbology based on each individual community's zoning map, see Stark County Communities Zoning. This layer was originally conceived as part of a general zoning map for 12 counties across Northeast Ohio. The project was headed by the Northeast Ohio Sustainable Communities Consortium (NEOSCC), with the final map being produced by the Stark County Regional Planning Commission (SCRPC). SCRPC worked with Stark County's cities and villages to obtain zoning data they maintained and then completed the layer by digitizing zoning data for the county's townships with zoning resolutions (some of Stark County's townships and villages are not zoned). Once that project was completed in 2013, SCRPC continued to update zoning data for the townships. City and village data was appended to the layer when provided by those communities.This layer was revamped in 2022 to provide additional capabilities. A field for general zoning was added to show generalized zones to eliminate the need to symbolize by the hundreds of zones across the county. Information for what chapter/section was added, along with hyperlinks to those sections in the codified ordinances and zoning resolutions for communities with that information online. The symbology for the generalized zones were inspired by the American Planning Association's (APA) Land Based Classification Standards (LBCS).

Geospatial data about Bernalillo County, New Mexico Zoning. Export to CAD, GIS, PDF, CSV and access via API.

For countywide generalized zoning, see Stark County Generalized Zoning. Zoning symbolized according to each individual community’s zoning map with Stark County, Ohio. This layer was originally conceived as part of a general zoning map for 12 counties across Northeast Ohio. The project was headed by the Northeast Ohio Sustainable Communities Consortium (NEOSCC), with the final map being produced by the Stark County Regional Planning Commission (SCRPC). SCRPC worked with Stark County's cities and villages to obtain zoning data they maintained and then completed the layer by digitizing zoning data for the county's townships with zoning resolutions (some of Stark County's townships and villages are not zoned). Once that project was completed in 2013, SCRPC continued to update zoning data for the townships. City and village data was appended to the layer when provided by those communities. This layer was revamped in 2022 to provide additional capabilities. A field for general zoning was added to show generalized zones to eliminate the need to symbolize by the hundreds of zones across the county. Information for what chapter/section was added, along with hyperlinks to those sections in the codified ordinances and zoning resolutions for communities with that information online. This layer is symbolized according to the zoning maps of each community, which means the same zone in two different communities can be different colors. These colors are decided by the communities and match their paper zoning maps when possible.