Facebook
TwitterThe dataset is made publicly available as a GIS at nominal 1:5 000 000 scale, and shows the time-space-event distribution of mafic-ultramafic magmatism in Australia from the early Archean to the present day. Development of this GIS has been a multi-year project and earlier released extracts (in viewable pdf form with accompanying Geoscience Australia Records) included compilations for the Archean magmatic record, the Proterozoic magmatic record, and the Australian Large Igneous Provinces (LIPs). Publication of the GIS completes the series with addition of the Phanerozoic magmatic record, and formalisation of the complete record of Archean-Phanerozoic magmatic events as a single series. The chronology of Australian mafic-ultramafic magmatism resolves into 74 magmatic events within, predominately, resolvable bands of ±10 million years. Each event is identified by geological units grouped by similar age - this coeval magmatism may or may not be genetically related and may be in response to different geodynamic environments. These magmatic events range in age from the Eoarchean ~3730 Ma ME 1 - Manfred Event, confined within a small remnant domain within the Yilgarn Craton, to the widespread record of Cenozoic magmatism in eastern Australia (ME 72 to ME 74). The magmatic events range in magnitude from the giant volumes of magma in Large Igneous Provinces, to events whose only known occurrence is an isolated record of dated mafic igneous rock in a single drillhole. The GIS makes it possible to focus on the location of any one of these magmatic events, or groups of magmatic events that may be of interest, and overlay context from any other information that users may have available. The delineation of magmatic events for this study is based on several hundred published ages of mafic and ultramafic igneous rocks from different isotopic systems and minerals. In addition to their ages and extents, primary recorded aspects of each magmatic event include the presence or absence of ultramafic components. Further to this, the presence or correlation of known magmatic-related mineralisation is highlighted in Time-Space-Event Charts of Australia (Appendix D, figures D1 and D2). The basis for mapping has been regional solid geology, interpreted basement geology and surface geology base maps made available by the State and Northern Territory geological surveys, providing insight into the total areal extent of the magmatic systems under cover. Also available to complement the Event GIS are the domains and element boundaries from the Australian Crustal Elements map. These boundaries which are which are based on geophysical extrapolation of crustal elements under the cover of continental basins, provide a framework of the shallow crustal structure of the continent, and are used in this guide. The Crustal Elements digital dataset is available for download from the Geoscience Australia website. Insight into the geodynamic development of the continent is provided by the magmatic event structure through time. The compilation draws attention to concentrations of mafic-ultramafic magmatism in the Archean from ~2820-2665 Ma, in the Proterozoic from ~1870-1590 Ma, and in the late Neoproterozoic-Phanerozoic from ~530-225 Ma. These three time spans contain 39 of the 74 magmatic events, 53% of the entire mafic-ultramafic magmatic event record of the continent. The periods in between have mafic-ultramafic magmatic records that are more dispersed in time. Other features of interest include the shared geographic and crustal element locations of Large Igneous Provinces and numerous events with smaller magma volumes. Read the rest of the Executive Summary in the document.
Facebook
TwitterSince its inception in 1991, the Data Access & Support Center (DASC) has served as the State of Kansas Geographic Information System (GIS) data clearinghouse. Created as a center for the archiving and distribution of geospatial data, DASC has worked to expand its service portfolio over the years. While data archiving and distribution are still at the core of DASC's mission, DASC also provides various geospatial services, including web-based application development and hosting, database development and integration, state and local coordination, technical support, and local GIS data backup. These services support the Kansas GIS Initiative and complement state and local GIS activities. During FY2023, DASC developed, maintained, and hosted GIS applications for numerous state agencies, including the Kansas 911 Coordinating Council, Kansas Department of Agriculture, Kansas Division of Emergency Management, Kansas Department of Revenue, Kansas State Department of Education, Kansas State Historical Society, Kansas Department of Transportation, Kansas Water Office, and the Kansas Department of Wildlife & Parks. The full Kansas geospatial catalog is administered by the Kansas Data Access & Support Center (DASC) and can be found at the following URL: https://hub.kansasgis.org/
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This document provides supporting information to assist in the use of the Australian Mafic-Ultramafic Magmatic Events GIS Dataset. The dataset is made publicly available as a GIS at nominal 1:5 000 …Show full descriptionThis document provides supporting information to assist in the use of the Australian Mafic-Ultramafic Magmatic Events GIS Dataset. The dataset is made publicly available as a GIS at nominal 1:5 000 000 scale, and shows the time-space-event distribution of mafic-ultramafic magmatism in Australia from the early Archean to the present day. Development of this GIS has been a multi-year project and earlier released extracts (in viewable pdf form with accompanying Geoscience Australia Records) included compilations for the Archean magmatic record, the Proterozoic magmatic record, and the Australian Large Igneous Provinces (LIPs). Publication of the GIS completes the series with addition of the Phanerozoic magmatic record, and formalisation of the complete record of Archean-Phanerozoic magmatic events as a single series. The chronology of Australian mafic-ultramafic magmatism resolves into 74 magmatic events within, predominately, resolvable bands of ±10 million years. Each event is identified by geological units grouped by similar age - this coeval magmatism may or may not be genetically related and may be in response to different geodynamic environments. These magmatic events range in age from the Eoarchean ~3730 Ma ME 1 - Manfred Event, confined within a small remnant domain within the Yilgarn Craton, to the widespread record of Cenozoic magmatism in eastern Australia (ME 72 to ME 74). The magmatic events range in magnitude from the giant volumes of magma in Large Igneous Provinces, to events whose only known occurrence is an isolated record of dated mafic igneous rock in a single drillhole. The GIS makes it possible to focus on the location of any one of these magmatic events, or groups of magmatic events that may be of interest, and overlay context from any other information that users may have available. The delineation of magmatic events for this study is based on several hundred published ages of mafic and ultramafic igneous rocks from different isotopic systems and minerals. In addition to their ages and extents, primary recorded aspects of each magmatic event include the presence or absence of ultramafic components. Further to this, the presence or correlation of known magmatic-related mineralisation is highlighted in Time-Space-Event Charts of Australia (Appendix D, figures D1 and D2). The basis for mapping has been regional solid geology, interpreted basement geology and surface geology base maps made available by the State and Northern Territory geological surveys, providing insight into the total areal extent of the magmatic systems under cover. Also available to complement the Event GIS are the domains and element boundaries from the Australian Crustal Elements map. These boundaries which are which are based on geophysical extrapolation of crustal elements under the cover of continental basins, provide a framework of the shallow crustal structure of the continent, and are used in this guide. The Crustal Elements digital dataset is available for download from the Geoscience Australia website. Insight into the geodynamic development of the continent is provided by the magmatic event structure through time. The compilation draws attention to concentrations of mafic-ultramafic magmatism in the Archean from ~2820-2665 Ma, in the Proterozoic from ~1870-1590 Ma, and in the late Neoproterozoic-Phanerozoic from ~530-225 Ma. These three time spans contain 39 of the 74 magmatic events, 53% of the entire mafic-ultramafic magmatic event record of the continent. The periods in between have mafic-ultramafic magmatic records that are more dispersed in time. Other features of interest include the shared geographic and crustal element locations of Large Igneous Provinces and numerous events with smaller magma volumes. Read the rest of the Executive Summary in the document.
Facebook
TwitterThis data release includes GIS shapefiles and metadata for location of the study area and phytoplankton taxonomy counts determined by Dr. Russel Rhodes, Faculty Emeritus, Department of Biology, Missouri State University, in three north Louisiana reservoirs: Cross Lake, Bayou D'Arbonne Lake, and Poverty Point Reservoir, June 2009-February 2011. These data and GIS coverages complement and support the findings in the companion report by Tollett and others (in review).
Facebook
TwitterThis data release includes GIS shapefiles and metadata for location of the study area and phytoplankton taxonomy counts determined by Dr. Russel Rhodes, Faculty Emeritus, Department of Biology, Missouri State University, in three north Louisiana reservoirs: Cross Lake, Bayou D'Arbonne Lake, and Poverty Point Reservoir, June 2009-February 2011. These data and GIS coverages complement and support the findings in the companion report by Tollett and others (in review).
Facebook
TwitterArcview GIS containing a regolith-landfrom map with associated site database. Most sites have a field photograph hot linked into the GIS. Complementary datasets include, digital elevation model and enhanced Landsat TM imagery.
Facebook
TwitterGeospatial administrative region data
https://www.wri.org/resources/data-sets/kenya-gis-data
added to complement Kiva dataset
Facebook
TwitterThis dataset is complementary to the “Deforestation-corrected SRTM-DEM” and “Height above the nearest drainage (HAND) dataset for eighteen drainage thresholds” dataset, also available in this repository. This mask of polygons delimits areas inside and outside the Interfluve between the rivers Purus and Madeira where validations of the drainage extraction were not done and deforestation features were not corrected.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Riparian corridors are important areas that maintain connectivity throughout the state of California. The riparian corridors complement the northern Sierra Nevada foothills wildlife connectivity project linkages to further achieve connectivity in the study area. We identified 280 riparian corridors represented by 232 named creeks, 43 named rivers, and 5 sloughs, forks or runs. The major corridors are the Sacramento, San Joaquin, Pit, Tuolumne, Merced, Feather and Stanislaus rivers. The 280 riparian corridors connect 201 landscape blocks. The riparian corridors complement the focal species linkages by providing many east-west corridors while the majority of linkages have a north-south orientation. Also by following the entire passage of the riparian area, these corridors run through many of the landscape blocks across the study area, helping to provide connectivity outside of habitat patch areas.We identified riparian corridors by selected streams, rivers and creeks from the NHD (National Hydrography Dataset) for state of California. From the NHD dataset, features named ‘StreamRiver’ were extracted from the ‘NHDFlowline’ vector dataset. A code 46006 was then used to extract perennial rivers and streams from the ‘StreamRiver’ dataset. However, this step resulted in a stream and river layer with many small segments. In order to reduce the number of segments and identify complete stream/river lines, we intersected the perennial rivers and streams layer with the CDFW statewide streams layer (‘CA_Streams_Statewide’) using the ‘Select by Location’ tool in ArcMap (‘CA_Streams_Statewide’ layer as target layer and the streams and rivers layer we extracted from NHD as a target layer). Second, we extracted features named ‘ArtificialPath’ from the ‘NHDFlowline’ vector dataset. Artificial paths represent the flow of water into, through, and out of features delineated using area; for example, rivers wide enough to be delineated as a polygon are represented by an artificial path flowline at their center line. Therefore, large rivers are often coded as “artificial path” in the NHD dataset. We then selected only those artificial paths with Geographic Names Information System (GNIS) names, with the assumption that artificial path features without names are “very minor streams, only of use to hydrologist” (http://nhd.usgs.gov). Next we used the same method we implemented for streams and rivers in order to remove small segments and have complete lines. The artificial path dataset is not coded to discriminate between perennial and intermittent ones similar to stream and river features. As a result, artificial paths that intersected with perennial streams and rivers were selected to represent permanent waterways. Then, the perennial stream and river layer and the artificial paths layer were merged into one dataset. After the merge we added a 500 m buffer to each side of the riparian area.We compared this merged stream/river layer with riparian vegetation classification data as a cross check. The riparian vegetation classification data are from the 2011 Northern Sierra Nevada Foothills and 2013 Eastern Central Valley fine-scale vegetation maps developed by the Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program (VegCamp) at the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. For areas outside the foothills and eastern central valley we used land cover data compiled by California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CDF) Fire and Resource Assessment Program (FRAP) in 2006, representing data for the period between 1997 and 2002. The resulting perennial dataset was then merged with the wetland and riparian datasets to represent perennial water sources in California. For more information see the project report at [https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=85358].
Facebook
TwitterPolygon feature GIS layer of all public park boundaries in Wyandotte County, KS. These boundaries are based primarily on public recreational land use extents interpreted from high resolution aerial imagery. A tax parcel GIS layer was the secondary information source (for land ownership). Additionally, this park layer's development started with a pre-existing park boundary GIS layer that used tax parcels as a basis. Published as an ESRI shapefile format, polygon vector layer, in US feet units in Kansas North State Plane coordinate system, NAD 83 datum Companion public parks datasets are available : 1) park_bldg_py for building footprints (polygons) 2) park facilities points layer (park_facility_pt), 3) plan line features like driveways, fences, etc (park_plan_ln), 4) plan point features like poles, light posts (park_plan_pt), 5) recreational facility polygons, e.g. tennis courts and ball diamonds (park_facility_py), 6) park trails (park_trail_ln) 6) GIS annotation labels are available to complement this park_py layer. Contact GSS for more information.By using this dataset you acknowledge the following:Kansas Open Records Act StatementThe Kansas Open Records Act provides in K.S.A. 45-230 that "no person shall knowingly sell, give or receive, for the purpose of selling or offering for sale, any property or service to persons listed therein, any list of names and addresses contained in, or derived from public records..." Violation of this law may subject the violator to a civil penalty of $500.00 for each violation. Violators will be reported for prosecution.By accessing this site, the user makes the following certification pursuant to K.S.A. 45-220(c)(2): "The requester does not intend to, and will not: (A) Use any list of names or addresses contained in or derived from the records or information for the purpose of selling or offering for sale any property or service to any person listed or to any person who resides at any address listed; or (B) sell, give or otherwise make available to any person any list of names or addresses contained in or derived from the records or information for the purpose of allowing that person to sell or offer for sale any property or service to any person listed or to any person who resides at any address listed."
Facebook
TwitterLocally Significant Industrial (LSIS) Sites are sites that have particular local importance for industrial and related functions, which complement provision in SILs. The GIS files show the indicative boundaries, please contact the relevant London Borough to confirm accuracy. NOTE: The boundaries are based on Ordnance Survey mapping and the data is published under Ordnance Survey's 'presumption to publish'.Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database rights 2019. Greater London Authority - Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0
Facebook
TwitterIllustrates the Sun Van Service Area Complementary ADA is 3/4 mile buffer around Sun Tran Routes 1-61 and Sun Shuttle Route 450. Premium Optional ADA is outside of the 3/4 mile buffer and includes all areas within the City of Tucson, city limits. Fare changes were approved September 20, 2016 - the Premium Optional ADA will be priced separate from Complementary ADA services. In addition to geographic boundaries Premium (Optional) Sun Van services include: Same day service requests and service requests outside of the complementary Sun Tran (Sun Shuttle) route service hours.PurposeThis layer is intended to be used in the Open Data portal and not for regular use in ArcGIS Online and ArcGIS Enterprise.Dataset ClassificationLevel 0 - OpenKnown UsesLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Known ErrorsLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Data ContactJohn ZukasDepartment of Transportation and Mobility520-837-6762john.zukas@tucsonaz.govUpdate FrequencyUpdates only required when Service Area expands or contracts.
Not seeing a result you expected?
Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.
Facebook
TwitterThe dataset is made publicly available as a GIS at nominal 1:5 000 000 scale, and shows the time-space-event distribution of mafic-ultramafic magmatism in Australia from the early Archean to the present day. Development of this GIS has been a multi-year project and earlier released extracts (in viewable pdf form with accompanying Geoscience Australia Records) included compilations for the Archean magmatic record, the Proterozoic magmatic record, and the Australian Large Igneous Provinces (LIPs). Publication of the GIS completes the series with addition of the Phanerozoic magmatic record, and formalisation of the complete record of Archean-Phanerozoic magmatic events as a single series. The chronology of Australian mafic-ultramafic magmatism resolves into 74 magmatic events within, predominately, resolvable bands of ±10 million years. Each event is identified by geological units grouped by similar age - this coeval magmatism may or may not be genetically related and may be in response to different geodynamic environments. These magmatic events range in age from the Eoarchean ~3730 Ma ME 1 - Manfred Event, confined within a small remnant domain within the Yilgarn Craton, to the widespread record of Cenozoic magmatism in eastern Australia (ME 72 to ME 74). The magmatic events range in magnitude from the giant volumes of magma in Large Igneous Provinces, to events whose only known occurrence is an isolated record of dated mafic igneous rock in a single drillhole. The GIS makes it possible to focus on the location of any one of these magmatic events, or groups of magmatic events that may be of interest, and overlay context from any other information that users may have available. The delineation of magmatic events for this study is based on several hundred published ages of mafic and ultramafic igneous rocks from different isotopic systems and minerals. In addition to their ages and extents, primary recorded aspects of each magmatic event include the presence or absence of ultramafic components. Further to this, the presence or correlation of known magmatic-related mineralisation is highlighted in Time-Space-Event Charts of Australia (Appendix D, figures D1 and D2). The basis for mapping has been regional solid geology, interpreted basement geology and surface geology base maps made available by the State and Northern Territory geological surveys, providing insight into the total areal extent of the magmatic systems under cover. Also available to complement the Event GIS are the domains and element boundaries from the Australian Crustal Elements map. These boundaries which are which are based on geophysical extrapolation of crustal elements under the cover of continental basins, provide a framework of the shallow crustal structure of the continent, and are used in this guide. The Crustal Elements digital dataset is available for download from the Geoscience Australia website. Insight into the geodynamic development of the continent is provided by the magmatic event structure through time. The compilation draws attention to concentrations of mafic-ultramafic magmatism in the Archean from ~2820-2665 Ma, in the Proterozoic from ~1870-1590 Ma, and in the late Neoproterozoic-Phanerozoic from ~530-225 Ma. These three time spans contain 39 of the 74 magmatic events, 53% of the entire mafic-ultramafic magmatic event record of the continent. The periods in between have mafic-ultramafic magmatic records that are more dispersed in time. Other features of interest include the shared geographic and crustal element locations of Large Igneous Provinces and numerous events with smaller magma volumes. Read the rest of the Executive Summary in the document.