Official statistics are produced impartially and free from political influence.
In May 2020, a survey carried out in the UK found that the 80 percent of British respondents overall reported that most people they knew had been obeying the lockdown rules. The respondents were more skeptical of the wider public as only 67 percent that most people in the UK were obeying the lockdown rules.
The latest number of cases in the UK can be found here. For further information about the coronavirus pandemic, please visit our dedicated Facts and Figures page.
The data includes:
See the detailed data on the https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/?_ga=2.109925509.1890178962.1629707832-542459309.1612521000" class="govuk-link">progress of the coronavirus pandemic. This includes the number of people testing positive, case rates and deaths within 28 days of positive test by lower tier local authority.
Also see guidance on COVID-19 restrictions.
As of May 2020, a survey carried out in the United Kingdom found that most Brits would not be comfortable doing many public activities if the current coronavirus lockdown restrictions were relaxed. Ten percent of respondents said they would be slightly comfortable travelling by bus after lockdown restrictions have been eased, compared to 20 percent who said they would be slightly uncomfortable. The latest number of cases in the UK can be found here. For further information about the coronavirus pandemic, please visit our dedicated Facts and Figures page.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Characteristics of respondents from online survey for pregnant women with GDM during COVID-19 pandemic according to meeting the physical activity guidelines/not meeting the physical activity guidelines.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The data in this resource represents the compilation and analysis of the intellectual property terms in the eleven publicly accessible advanced purchase agreements which were signed in 2020, i.e. prior to an approved vaccine being available, five concluded by the UK government and six by the EU Commission.
The agreements analysed are as follows (in chronological order of the date they were signed): EU & AstraZeneca (27 August 2020) – unredacted. UK & AstraZeneca (28 August 2020) – redacted. UK & Valneva (13 September 2020) – redacted. EU & Sanofi/GSK (16 September 2020) – redacted. UK & Pfizer/BioNTech (12 October 2020) – redacted. EU & Janssen (21 October 2020) – redacted. UK & Novavax (22 October 2020) – redacted. EU & Pfizer/BioNTech (11 November 2020) – redacted. UK & Moderna (16 November 2020) – redacted. EU & CureVac (17 November 2020) – redacted. EU & Moderna (4 December 2020) – unredacted.
According to the report undertaken by the National Audit Office published on the 14 December 2020, the UK the UK government had concluded, as of the 8 December 2020, five agreements with potential vaccine suppliers. National Audit Office, ‘Investigation into Preparations for Potential COVID-19 Vaccines’ (14 December 2020) https://www.nao.org.uk/reports/investigation-into-preparations-for-potential-covid-19-vaccines/ accessed 30 September 2022.
For access to relevant documents related to the EU Vaccines Strategy see https://ec.europa.eu/info/live-work-travel-eu/coronavirus-response/public-health/eu-vaccines-strategy_en accessed 30 September 2022.
Copies of each agreement are also on file with the authors and are available on request.
Business leaders within the eating and drinking out sector in the United Kingdom expected their biggest challenges for business recovery post-lockdown due to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic to be operational changes and Government regulations. Challenges related to staff and supply were not considered as major.
Our statistical practice is regulated by the Office for Statistics Regulation (OSR). The OSR sets the standards of trustworthiness, quality and value in the Code of Practice for Statistics that all producers of official statistics should adhere to.
Provisional monthly uptake data for seasonal influenza and COVID-19 vaccines for frontline HCWs working in trusts, Independent Sector Healthcare Providers (ISHCPs), and GP practices in England.
Data is presented at national, NHS regional and individual trust levels.
View the pre-release access list for these reports.
Data from NHS trusts about X-Rays, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans.
These documents record the equality analysis undertaken for the decision to move England into step 4 through the Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (Steps etc.) (England) (Revocation and Amendment) Regulations 2021.
Ministers are required under the https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2011/2260/contents/made" class="govuk-link">Public Sector Equality Duty (PSED) as set out in section 149 of the Equality Act 2010 to have regard to the need to:
Ministers are required to consider the impact of policy decisions on people’s protected characteristics, with particular emphasis on meeting the duties set out above. These protected characteristics are:
The regulations covered by these PSED documents relate to the decision to move England into step 4 on 19 July 2021. This resulted in most legal restrictions, including those relating to social distancing and social contact, ending. All remaining businesses were allowed to reopen.
Based on responses from the Winter Coronavirus (COVID-19) Infection Study to deliver real-time information to help assess the effects of COVID-19 on the lives of individuals and the community, and help understand the potential winter pressures on our health services.
The study has been launched jointly by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) and the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), with data collected via online questionnaire completion and self-reported lateral flow device (LFD) results from previous participants of the COVID-19 Infection Survey.
The data tables are intended to be published fortnightly, but will become weekly if necessary, based on the scale and pattern of infections.
These statistics are published as official statistics in development. Our statistical practice is regulated by the Office for Statistics Regulation (OSR). The OSR sets the standards of trustworthiness, quality and value in the https://code.statisticsauthority.gov.uk/" class="govuk-link">Code of Practice for Statistics that all producers of official statistics should adhere to.
Data on COVID-19 vaccination update in health care workers in NHS Trusts.
In May 2020, a survey carried out in the UK found that 79 percent of British respondents overall reported they were following the lockdown rules as strictly as when they came into force. Although, a quarter of respondents in the age group 18 to 34 years reported to becoming more relaxed and not quite following the restrictions to their full strictness.
The latest number of cases in the UK can be found here. For further information about the coronavirus pandemic, please visit our dedicated Facts and Figures page.
The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, acting through the executive agency of the Department of Health and Social Care, Public Health England, has commissioned the provision of various services to support members of the public during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.
These services are part of the Pandemic and Health Emergency Response Services (PHERS) which supplements the response provided by primary care during pandemics and other health-related emergencies.
These documents explain how personal data is used, in line with the UK General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the Data Protection Act 2018. It includes information on the purpose and categories of data processed, and your rights if information about you is included.
OXFORD COVID-19 GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TRACKER
Data from https://www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/research/research-projects/oxford-covid-19-government-response-tracker
Governments are taking a wide range of measures in response to the COVID-19 outbreak. The Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker (OxCGRT) aims to record these unfolding responses in a rigorous, consistent way across countries and across time.
OxCGRT collects publicly available information on 11 indicators of government response, such as school closings, travel bans, or other measures. For a full description of the data and how they are collected, see this working paper.
For more information see https://www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/research/publications/variation-government-responses-covid-19 and https://www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/research/publications/variation-government-responses-covid-19.
There are currently > 9,000 entries.
Data from https://www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/research/research-projects/oxford-covid-19-government-response-tracker
Banner Photo by Trust "Tru" Katsande on Unsplash
https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F1314380%2Ff4a2efd06213890e48113386caafbe0b%2FScreen%20Shot%202020-03-25%20at%208.58.57%20AM.png?generation=1585148512711932&alt=media" alt="">
Our statistical practice is regulated by the Office for Statistics Regulation (OSR). OSR sets the standards of trustworthiness, quality and value in the Code of Practice for Statistics that all producers of official statistics should adhere to. You are welcome to contact us directly by emailing transport.statistics@dft.gov.uk with any comments about how we meet these standards.
These statistics on transport use are published monthly.
For each day, the Department for Transport (DfT) produces statistics on domestic transport:
The associated methodology notes set out information on the data sources and methodology used to generate these headline measures.
From September 2023, these statistics include a second rail usage time series which excludes Elizabeth Line service (and other relevant services that have been replaced by the Elizabeth line) from both the travel week and its equivalent baseline week in 2019. This allows for a more meaningful like-for-like comparison of rail demand across the period because the effects of the Elizabeth Line on rail demand are removed. More information can be found in the methodology document.
The table below provides the reference of regular statistics collections published by DfT on these topics, with their last and upcoming publication dates.
Mode | Publication and link | Latest period covered and next publication |
---|---|---|
Road traffic | Road traffic statistics | Full annual data up to December 2023 was published in May 2024. Quarterly data up to September 2024 was published December 2024. |
Rail usage | The Office of Rail and Road (ORR) publishes a range of statistics including passenger and freight rail performance and usage. Statistics are available at the https://www.orr.gov.uk/published-statistics" class="govuk-link">ORR website. Statistics for rail passenger numbers and crowding on weekdays in major cities in England and Wales are published by DfT. |
ORR’s latest quarterly rail usage statistics, covering July to September 2024, was published in December 2024. DfT’s most recent annual passenger numbers and crowding statistics for 2023 were published in September 2024. |
Bus usage | Bus statistics | The most recent annual publication covered the year ending March 2024. The most recent quarterly publication covered October to December 2024. |
TfL tube and bus usage | Data on buses is covered by the section above. https://tfl.gov.uk/status-updates/busiest-times-to-travel" class="govuk-link">Station level business data is available. | |
Cycling usage | Walking and cycling statistics, England | 2023 calendar year published in August 2024. |
Cross Modal and journey by purpose | National Travel Survey | 2023 calendar year data published in August 2024. |
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
As members of the MGFVPC we have extensive research experience in documenting and developing strategies on family violence (https://arts.monash.edu/gender-and-family- violence. Collectively we are currently engaged in research documenting the impact of policies introduced as a result of Covid-19 on women (and children)(see Pfitzner, Fitz-Gibbon & True, Gender-based violence and help-seeking behaviours during the COVID-19 Pandemic (https://www.monash.edu/arts/gender-and-family-violence/research-projects/covid-19- and-gender-based-violence); Segrave & Maher, Family violence, help seeking and temporary migration during COVID-19 (https://lens.monash.edu/@politics- society/2020/04/02/1379949/coronavirus-family-violence-and-temporary-migration-in-the-time-of- covid-19) and Walklate et al, Domestic Abuse: Responding to the Shadow Pandemic in England and Wales (https://www.liverpool.ac.uk/law-and-social-justice/research/coronavirus- research/the-shadow-pandemic/working-papers/).
Based on our ongoing and current research expertise in this area, our response focuses primarily on the third question posed by this inquiry:
• Which groups will be disproportionately affected by measures taken by the Government to address the COVID-19 pandemic?
In what follows we offer a review of some of the key concerns that this question raises and offer five recommendations in the light of our review.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
A nationwide survey was conducted during the first UK lockdown to further understanding of the degree to which motives for exercise were associated with physical activity (PA) behaviours and, in turn, how PA behaviours were associated with mental health. A cross-sectional design was employed and data were collected by use of a one-off online survey (N = 392; 18–85 years; MBMI = 25.48; SDBMI = 5.05; 314 women). Exercise motives, PA, and mental health were measured by use of the Behavioural Regulations in Exercise Questionnaire-3, Brunel Lifestyle Physical Activity Questionnaire, and General Health Quesionnaire-12, respectively. Participants were also asked to specify their average step count per day, if they used a mobile device for this purpose (n = 190). Analyses comprised hierarchical regressions and partial correlations. Results indicated that behavioural regulations were more strongly associated with planned PA pre-lockdown, compared to during lockdown. There were no differences observed in explained variance between pre- and during lockdown for unplanned PA and steps per day. Planned and unplanned PA were significant explanatory variables for mental health both pre- and during lockdown, but sedentary behaviour was not. Partial correlations, with BMI and age partialled out, showed that steps per day were not correlated with mental health either pre- or during lockdown. The range of variables used to explain planned and unplanned PA and mental health suggest that people’s motives to exercise were tempered by lockdown. For those who routinely measured their steps per day, the step count was unrelated to their mental health scores both pre- and during lockdown. It appears that engagement in regular PA confers some minor benefits for mental health.
The COVID-19 pandemic has caused major disruptions to families' lives in many ways, including through lockdowns, social distancing, home learning requirements, and restrictions. This resulted in a rapidly changing situation where different pressures have arisen for children, young people and their families over time. Understanding the psychological effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on children and young people, through the collection of high quality data and in a way that could directly inform policy, was set out as an immediate research priority in a Lancet position paper (Holmes et al., 2020) at the start of the pandemic. The Co-SPACE study was launched on 30th March 2020, a week after the first national lockdown was implemented in the UK, with the purpose of using the findings to inform resources and support for families. It was then extended in 2022 under the project on 'Learning from the trajectories of mental health challenges for children, young people and parents over the course of the Covid-19 pandemic' in collaboration with the CORONA x CODOMO project in Japan (run by Dr Naho Morisaki at the National Center for Child Health and Development).
The Co-SPACE project aimed to:
track participating children and young people’s mental health throughout the COVID-19 crisis,
identify what protects children and young people from deteriorating mental health (over time, and at particular stress points),
determine how this varies according to child, family and environmental characteristics.
The Co-SPACE study, overall, involved an online longitudinal survey completed monthly from March 2020 to July 2021 by (i) UK-based parents/carers of children and young people (aged 4-16 years, at the start of the study), and (ii) their children (if aged 11-16 years, at the start of the study). Additional, longer-term follow-ups were then completed 6-monthly in March/April 2022, October 2022, and March/April 2023 by parents who took part in the original Co-SPACE survey. To develop a richer understanding of people’s experiences, qualitative interviews were also conducted with parents/carers, young people, and people who work with them. The current data available includes parent/carer reported survey data only.
The study was designed and conducted with rapid and meaningful stakeholder involvement, including through in-depth discussion with advisory groups of experts, young people, and parents/carers. Parent/carer and young people's involvement was facilitated through the UKRI Emerging Minds Research Network Plus.
In addition to the Principal Investigators (PW, CC, & SS), contributors to the study were as follows: Praveetha Patalay, UCL; Helen Dodd, University of Exeter; Pete Lawrence, University of Southampton; Simona Skripkauskaite, University of Oxford; Samantha Pearcey, University of Oxford; Adrienne Shum, University of Oxford; Amy McCall, University of Oxford; Olly Robertson, University of Oxford; Bettina Moltrecht, UCL; Eoin McElroy, Ulster University; Lowrie Hilladakis (nee Burgess), University of Oxford; Ning Ding, University of Oxford; Martha Oakes, University of Oxford; Naho Morisaki, National Center for Child Health and Development .
Further information, including research reports, are available from the Co-SPACE project website.
Latest edition information
For the second edition (January 2025), the study has been updated to include three new waves of data collection conducted between March 2022 and March 2023. The data and documentation files have been replaced with new versions.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Additional file 4. Confirmed and Deaths Data.
Official statistics are produced impartially and free from political influence.