100+ datasets found
  1. COVID-19 death rates in the United States as of March 10, 2023, by state

    • statista.com
    Updated May 15, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). COVID-19 death rates in the United States as of March 10, 2023, by state [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1109011/coronavirus-covid19-death-rates-us-by-state/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 15, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    As of March 10, 2023, the death rate from COVID-19 in the state of New York was 397 per 100,000 people. New York is one of the states with the highest number of COVID-19 cases.

  2. COVID-19 cases and deaths per million in 210 countries as of July 13, 2022

    • statista.com
    Updated Jul 13, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2022). COVID-19 cases and deaths per million in 210 countries as of July 13, 2022 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1104709/coronavirus-deaths-worldwide-per-million-inhabitants/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 13, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    Based on a comparison of coronavirus deaths in 210 countries relative to their population, Peru had the most losses to COVID-19 up until July 13, 2022. As of the same date, the virus had infected over 557.8 million people worldwide, and the number of deaths had totaled more than 6.3 million. Note, however, that COVID-19 test rates can vary per country. Additionally, big differences show up between countries when combining the number of deaths against confirmed COVID-19 cases. The source seemingly does not differentiate between "the Wuhan strain" (2019-nCOV) of COVID-19, "the Kent mutation" (B.1.1.7) that appeared in the UK in late 2020, the 2021 Delta variant (B.1.617.2) from India or the Omicron variant (B.1.1.529) from South Africa.

    The difficulties of death figures

    This table aims to provide a complete picture on the topic, but it very much relies on data that has become more difficult to compare. As the coronavirus pandemic developed across the world, countries already used different methods to count fatalities, and they sometimes changed them during the course of the pandemic. On April 16, for example, the Chinese city of Wuhan added a 50 percent increase in their death figures to account for community deaths. These deaths occurred outside of hospitals and went unaccounted for so far. The state of New York did something similar two days before, revising their figures with 3,700 new deaths as they started to include “assumed” coronavirus victims. The United Kingdom started counting deaths in care homes and private households on April 29, adjusting their number with about 5,000 new deaths (which were corrected lowered again by the same amount on August 18). This makes an already difficult comparison even more difficult. Belgium, for example, counts suspected coronavirus deaths in their figures, whereas other countries have not done that (yet). This means two things. First, it could have a big impact on both current as well as future figures. On April 16 already, UK health experts stated that if their numbers were corrected for community deaths like in Wuhan, the UK number would change from 205 to “above 300”. This is exactly what happened two weeks later. Second, it is difficult to pinpoint exactly which countries already have “revised” numbers (like Belgium, Wuhan or New York) and which ones do not. One work-around could be to look at (freely accessible) timelines that track the reported daily increase of deaths in certain countries. Several of these are available on our platform, such as for Belgium, Italy and Sweden. A sudden large increase might be an indicator that the domestic sources changed their methodology.

    Where are these numbers coming from?

    The numbers shown here were collected by Johns Hopkins University, a source that manually checks the data with domestic health authorities. For the majority of countries, this is from national authorities. In some cases, like China, the United States, Canada or Australia, city reports or other various state authorities were consulted. In this statistic, these separately reported numbers were put together. For more information or other freely accessible content, please visit our dedicated Facts and Figures page.

  3. n

    Coronavirus (Covid-19) Data in the United States

    • nytimes.com
    • openicpsr.org
    • +4more
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    New York Times, Coronavirus (Covid-19) Data in the United States [Dataset]. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/coronavirus-us-cases.html
    Explore at:
    Dataset provided by
    New York Times
    Description

    The New York Times is releasing a series of data files with cumulative counts of coronavirus cases in the United States, at the state and county level, over time. We are compiling this time series data from state and local governments and health departments in an attempt to provide a complete record of the ongoing outbreak.

    Since late January, The Times has tracked cases of coronavirus in real time as they were identified after testing. Because of the widespread shortage of testing, however, the data is necessarily limited in the picture it presents of the outbreak.

    We have used this data to power our maps and reporting tracking the outbreak, and it is now being made available to the public in response to requests from researchers, scientists and government officials who would like access to the data to better understand the outbreak.

    The data begins with the first reported coronavirus case in Washington State on Jan. 21, 2020. We will publish regular updates to the data in this repository.

  4. COVID-19 Case Mortality Ratios by Country

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated Sep 25, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Paul Mooney (2020). COVID-19 Case Mortality Ratios by Country [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/paultimothymooney/coronavirus-covid19-mortality-rate-by-country
    Explore at:
    zip(7847 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 25, 2020
    Authors
    Paul Mooney
    Description

    Context

    The 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic is an ongoing pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019%E2%80%9320_coronavirus_pandemic.

    Content

    Coronavirus COVID-19 confirmed cases, deaths, case mortality ratios, country, latitude, and longitude.

    Disclaimer: Data will be more accurate as more data comes in. Deaths/Infections will be a better measure of mortality rate after a pandemic is over, when the estimates of the number of infections start to get closer to the true number of infected individuals. Note discussion of case mortality ratio (numbers as they are reported) vs infection mortality ratio (estimates of the actual numbers). This dataset discusses case mortality ratios.

    Acknowledgements

    Banner photo by Adhy Savala on Unsplash.

    Data generated from the notebook https://www.kaggle.com/paultimothymooney/does-latitude-impact-the-spread-of-covid-19 using data from https://www.kaggle.com/paultimothymooney/latitude-and-longitude-for-every-country-and-state and https://www.kaggle.com/sudalairajkumar/novel-corona-virus-2019-dataset, all of which were released under open data licenses.

  5. COVID-19 death rates countries worldwide as of April 26, 2022

    • statista.com
    Updated Mar 28, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2020). COVID-19 death rates countries worldwide as of April 26, 2022 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1105914/coronavirus-death-rates-worldwide/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 28, 2020
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    COVID-19 rate of death, or the known deaths divided by confirmed cases, was over ten percent in Yemen, the only country that has 1,000 or more cases. This according to a calculation that combines coronavirus stats on both deaths and registered cases for 221 different countries. Note that death rates are not the same as the chance of dying from an infection or the number of deaths based on an at-risk population. By April 26, 2022, the virus had infected over 510.2 million people worldwide, and led to a loss of 6.2 million. The source seemingly does not differentiate between "the Wuhan strain" (2019-nCOV) of COVID-19, "the Kent mutation" (B.1.1.7) that appeared in the UK in late 2020, the 2021 Delta variant (B.1.617.2) from India or the Omicron variant (B.1.1.529) from South Africa.

    Where are these numbers coming from?

    The numbers shown here were collected by Johns Hopkins University, a source that manually checks the data with domestic health authorities. For the majority of countries, this is from national authorities. In some cases, like China, the United States, Canada or Australia, city reports or other various state authorities were consulted. In this statistic, these separately reported numbers were put together. Note that Statista aims to also provide domestic source material for a more complete picture, and not to just look at one particular source. Examples are these statistics on the confirmed coronavirus cases in Russia or the COVID-19 cases in Italy, both of which are from domestic sources. For more information or other freely accessible content, please visit our dedicated Facts and Figures page.

    A word on the flaws of numbers like this

    People are right to ask whether these numbers are at all representative or not for several reasons. First, countries worldwide decide differently on who gets tested for the virus, meaning that comparing case numbers or death rates could to some extent be misleading. Germany, for example, started testing relatively early once the country’s first case was confirmed in Bavaria in January 2020, whereas Italy tests for the coronavirus postmortem. Second, not all people go to see (or can see, due to testing capacity) a doctor when they have mild symptoms. Countries like Norway and the Netherlands, for example, recommend people with non-severe symptoms to just stay at home. This means not all cases are known all the time, which could significantly alter the death rate as it is presented here. Third and finally, numbers like this change very frequently depending on how the pandemic spreads or the national healthcare capacity. It is therefore recommended to look at other (freely accessible) content that dives more into specifics, such as the coronavirus testing capacity in India or the number of hospital beds in the UK. Only with additional pieces of information can you get the full picture, something that this statistic in its current state simply cannot provide.

  6. Estimated infected population sizes and infection rates as a function of...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 10, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Steen Rasmussen; Michael Skytte Petersen; Niels Høiby (2023). Estimated infected population sizes and infection rates as a function of hospital population using Eqs. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249733.t002
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 10, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Steen Rasmussen; Michael Skytte Petersen; Niels Høiby
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Estimated infected population sizes and infection rates as a function of hospital population using Eqs.

  7. d

    Johns Hopkins COVID-19 Case Tracker

    • data.world
    • kaggle.com
    csv, zip
    Updated Dec 3, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    The Associated Press (2025). Johns Hopkins COVID-19 Case Tracker [Dataset]. https://data.world/associatedpress/johns-hopkins-coronavirus-case-tracker
    Explore at:
    zip, csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 3, 2025
    Authors
    The Associated Press
    Time period covered
    Jan 22, 2020 - Mar 9, 2023
    Area covered
    Description

    Updates

    • Notice of data discontinuation: Since the start of the pandemic, AP has reported case and death counts from data provided by Johns Hopkins University. Johns Hopkins University has announced that they will stop their daily data collection efforts after March 10. As Johns Hopkins stops providing data, the AP will also stop collecting daily numbers for COVID cases and deaths. The HHS and CDC now collect and visualize key metrics for the pandemic. AP advises using those resources when reporting on the pandemic going forward.

    • April 9, 2020

      • The population estimate data for New York County, NY has been updated to include all five New York City counties (Kings County, Queens County, Bronx County, Richmond County and New York County). This has been done to match the Johns Hopkins COVID-19 data, which aggregates counts for the five New York City counties to New York County.
    • April 20, 2020

      • Johns Hopkins death totals in the US now include confirmed and probable deaths in accordance with CDC guidelines as of April 14. One significant result of this change was an increase of more than 3,700 deaths in the New York City count. This change will likely result in increases for death counts elsewhere as well. The AP does not alter the Johns Hopkins source data, so probable deaths are included in this dataset as well.
    • April 29, 2020

      • The AP is now providing timeseries data for counts of COVID-19 cases and deaths. The raw counts are provided here unaltered, along with a population column with Census ACS-5 estimates and calculated daily case and death rates per 100,000 people. Please read the updated caveats section for more information.
    • September 1st, 2020

      • Johns Hopkins is now providing counts for the five New York City counties individually.
    • February 12, 2021

      • The Ohio Department of Health recently announced that as many as 4,000 COVID-19 deaths may have been underreported through the state’s reporting system, and that the "daily reported death counts will be high for a two to three-day period."
      • Because deaths data will be anomalous for consecutive days, we have chosen to freeze Ohio's rolling average for daily deaths at the last valid measure until Johns Hopkins is able to back-distribute the data. The raw daily death counts, as reported by Johns Hopkins and including the backlogged death data, will still be present in the new_deaths column.
    • February 16, 2021

      - Johns Hopkins has reconciled Ohio's historical deaths data with the state.

      Overview

    The AP is using data collected by the Johns Hopkins University Center for Systems Science and Engineering as our source for outbreak caseloads and death counts for the United States and globally.

    The Hopkins data is available at the county level in the United States. The AP has paired this data with population figures and county rural/urban designations, and has calculated caseload and death rates per 100,000 people. Be aware that caseloads may reflect the availability of tests -- and the ability to turn around test results quickly -- rather than actual disease spread or true infection rates.

    This data is from the Hopkins dashboard that is updated regularly throughout the day. Like all organizations dealing with data, Hopkins is constantly refining and cleaning up their feed, so there may be brief moments where data does not appear correctly. At this link, you’ll find the Hopkins daily data reports, and a clean version of their feed.

    The AP is updating this dataset hourly at 45 minutes past the hour.

    To learn more about AP's data journalism capabilities for publishers, corporations and financial institutions, go here or email kromano@ap.org.

    Queries

    Use AP's queries to filter the data or to join to other datasets we've made available to help cover the coronavirus pandemic

    Interactive

    The AP has designed an interactive map to track COVID-19 cases reported by Johns Hopkins.

    @(https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/nRyaf/15/)

    Interactive Embed Code

    <iframe title="USA counties (2018) choropleth map Mapping COVID-19 cases by county" aria-describedby="" id="datawrapper-chart-nRyaf" src="https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/nRyaf/10/" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="width: 0; min-width: 100% !important;" height="400"></iframe><script type="text/javascript">(function() {'use strict';window.addEventListener('message', function(event) {if (typeof event.data['datawrapper-height'] !== 'undefined') {for (var chartId in event.data['datawrapper-height']) {var iframe = document.getElementById('datawrapper-chart-' + chartId) || document.querySelector("iframe[src*='" + chartId + "']");if (!iframe) {continue;}iframe.style.height = event.data['datawrapper-height'][chartId] + 'px';}}});})();</script>
    

    Caveats

    • This data represents the number of cases and deaths reported by each state and has been collected by Johns Hopkins from a number of sources cited on their website.
    • In some cases, deaths or cases of people who've crossed state lines -- either to receive treatment or because they became sick and couldn't return home while traveling -- are reported in a state they aren't currently in, because of state reporting rules.
    • In some states, there are a number of cases not assigned to a specific county -- for those cases, the county name is "unassigned to a single county"
    • This data should be credited to Johns Hopkins University's COVID-19 tracking project. The AP is simply making it available here for ease of use for reporters and members.
    • Caseloads may reflect the availability of tests -- and the ability to turn around test results quickly -- rather than actual disease spread or true infection rates.
    • Population estimates at the county level are drawn from 2014-18 5-year estimates from the American Community Survey.
    • The Urban/Rural classification scheme is from the Center for Disease Control and Preventions's National Center for Health Statistics. It puts each county into one of six categories -- from Large Central Metro to Non-Core -- according to population and other characteristics. More details about the classifications can be found here.

    Johns Hopkins timeseries data - Johns Hopkins pulls data regularly to update their dashboard. Once a day, around 8pm EDT, Johns Hopkins adds the counts for all areas they cover to the timeseries file. These counts are snapshots of the latest cumulative counts provided by the source on that day. This can lead to inconsistencies if a source updates their historical data for accuracy, either increasing or decreasing the latest cumulative count. - Johns Hopkins periodically edits their historical timeseries data for accuracy. They provide a file documenting all errors in their timeseries files that they have identified and fixed here

    Attribution

    This data should be credited to Johns Hopkins University COVID-19 tracking project

  8. Deaths due to COVID-19 by local area and deprivation

    • ons.gov.uk
    • cy.ons.gov.uk
    xlsx
    Updated May 20, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Office for National Statistics (2021). Deaths due to COVID-19 by local area and deprivation [Dataset]. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/deathsduetocovid19bylocalareaanddeprivation
    Explore at:
    xlsxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 20, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    Office for National Statisticshttp://www.ons.gov.uk/
    License

    Open Government Licence 3.0http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Provisional age-standardised mortality rates for deaths due to COVID-19 by sex, local authority and deprivation indices, and numbers of deaths by middle-layer super output area.

  9. Estimates of ascertainment rate, risk of being severe or critical for...

    • figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 7, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Andrea Parisi; Samuel P. C. Brand; Joe Hilton; Rabia Aziza; Matt J. Keeling; D. James Nokes (2023). Estimates of ascertainment rate, risk of being severe or critical for detected cases, risk of death for critical or severe cases, and infection fatality ratio (95% confidence interval in brackets). [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009090.t001
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 7, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Andrea Parisi; Samuel P. C. Brand; Joe Hilton; Rabia Aziza; Matt J. Keeling; D. James Nokes
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    In Grasselli et al. [21], which we use to estimate death risks, individuals up to 39 years old are grouped into two groups corresponding to 0–19 and 20–39. No deaths were registered in the youngest group: rates for the 20–29 and 30–39 were obtained from the second group. The Infection Fatality Rate is obtained by appropriately combining the other five columns.

  10. COVID-19 State Data

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated Nov 3, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Night Ranger (2020). COVID-19 State Data [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/nightranger77/covid19-state-data
    Explore at:
    zip(4501 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 3, 2020
    Authors
    Night Ranger
    Description

    This dataset is a per-state amalgamation of demographic, public health and other relevant predictors for COVID-19.

    Deaths, Infections and Tests by State

    The COVID Tracking Project: https://covidtracking.com/data/api

    Used positive, death and totalTestResults from the API for, respectively, Infected, Deaths and Tested in this dataset. Please read the documentation of the API for more context on those columns

    Predictor Data and Sources

    Population (2020)

    Density is people per meter squared https://worldpopulationreview.com/states/

    ICU Beds and Age 60+

    https://khn.org/news/as-coronavirus-spreads-widely-millions-of-older-americans-live-in-counties-with-no-icu-beds/

    GDP

    https://worldpopulationreview.com/states/gdp-by-state/

    Income per capita (2018)

    https://worldpopulationreview.com/states/per-capita-income-by-state/

    Gini

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by_Gini_coefficient

    Unemployment (2020)

    Rates from Feb 2020 and are percentage of labor force
    https://www.bls.gov/web/laus/laumstrk.htm

    Sex (2017)

    Ratio is Male / Female
    https://www.kff.org/other/state-indicator/distribution-by-gender/

    Smoking Percentage (2020)

    https://worldpopulationreview.com/states/smoking-rates-by-state/

    Influenza and Pneumonia Death Rate (2018)

    Death rate per 100,000 people
    https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/sosmap/flu_pneumonia_mortality/flu_pneumonia.htm

    Chronic Lower Respiratory Disease Death Rate (2018)

    Death rate per 100,000 people
    https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/sosmap/lung_disease_mortality/lung_disease.htm

    Active Physicians (2019)

    https://www.kff.org/other/state-indicator/total-active-physicians/

    Hospitals (2018)

    https://www.kff.org/other/state-indicator/total-hospitals

    Health spending per capita

    Includes spending for all health care services and products by state of residence. Hospital spending is included and reflects the total net revenue. Costs such as insurance, administration, research, and construction expenses are not included.
    https://www.kff.org/other/state-indicator/avg-annual-growth-per-capita/

    Pollution (2019)

    Pollution: Average exposure of the general public to particulate matter of 2.5 microns or less (PM2.5) measured in micrograms per cubic meter (3-year estimate)
    https://www.americashealthrankings.org/explore/annual/measure/air/state/ALL

    Medium and Large Airports

    For each state, number of medium and large airports https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_busiest_airports_in_the_United_States

    Temperature (2019)

    Note that FL was incorrect in the table, but is corrected in the Hottest States paragraph
    https://worldpopulationreview.com/states/average-temperatures-by-state/
    District of Columbia temperature computed as the average of Maryland and Virginia

    Urbanization (2010)

    Urbanization as a percentage of the population https://www.icip.iastate.edu/tables/population/urban-pct-states

    Age Groups (2018)

    https://www.kff.org/other/state-indicator/distribution-by-age/

    School Closure Dates

    Schools that haven't closed are marked NaN https://www.edweek.org/ew/section/multimedia/map-coronavirus-and-school-closures.html

    Note that some datasets above did not contain data for District of Columbia, this missing data was found via Google searches manually entered.

  11. Preliminary 2024-2025 U.S. COVID-19 Burden Estimates

    • data.cdc.gov
    • data.virginia.gov
    • +1more
    csv, xlsx, xml
    Updated Sep 26, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Coronavirus and Other Respiratory Viruses Division (CORVD), National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD). (2025). Preliminary 2024-2025 U.S. COVID-19 Burden Estimates [Dataset]. https://data.cdc.gov/Public-Health-Surveillance/Preliminary-2024-2025-U-S-COVID-19-Burden-Estimate/ahrf-yqdt
    Explore at:
    xlsx, csv, xmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 26, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases
    Authors
    Coronavirus and Other Respiratory Viruses Division (CORVD), National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD).
    License

    https://www.usa.gov/government-workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works

    Description

    This dataset represents preliminary estimates of cumulative U.S. COVID-19 disease burden for the 2024-2025 period, including illnesses, outpatient visits, hospitalizations, and deaths. The weekly COVID-19-associated burden estimates are preliminary and based on continuously collected surveillance data from patients hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections. The data come from the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)-Associated Hospitalization Surveillance Network (COVID-NET), a surveillance platform that captures data from hospitals that serve about 10% of the U.S. population. Each week CDC estimates a range (i.e., lower estimate and an upper estimate) of COVID-19 -associated burden that have occurred since October 1, 2024.

    Note: Data are preliminary and subject to change as more data become available. Rates for recent COVID-19-associated hospital admissions are subject to reporting delays; as new data are received each week, previous rates are updated accordingly.

    References

    1. Reed C, Chaves SS, Daily Kirley P, et al. Estimating influenza disease burden from population-based surveillance data in the United States. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0118369. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118369 
    2. Rolfes, MA, Foppa, IM, Garg, S, et al. Annual estimates of the burden of seasonal influenza in the United States: A tool for strengthening influenza surveillance and preparedness. Influenza Other Respi Viruses. 2018; 12: 132– 137. https://doi.org/10.1111/irv.12486
    3. Tokars JI, Rolfes MA, Foppa IM, Reed C. An evaluation and update of methods for estimating the number of influenza cases averted by vaccination in the United States. Vaccine. 2018;36(48):7331-7337. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.10.026 
    4. Collier SA, Deng L, Adam EA, Benedict KM, Beshearse EM, Blackstock AJ, Bruce BB, Derado G, Edens C, Fullerton KE, Gargano JW, Geissler AL, Hall AJ, Havelaar AH, Hill VR, Hoekstra RM, Reddy SC, Scallan E, Stokes EK, Yoder JS, Beach MJ. Estimate of Burden and Direct Healthcare Cost of Infectious Waterborne Disease in the United States. Emerg Infect Dis. 2021 Jan;27(1):140-149. doi: 10.3201/eid2701.190676. PMID: 33350905; PMCID: PMC7774540.
    5. Reed C, Kim IK, Singleton JA,  et al. Estimated influenza illnesses and hospitalizations averted by vaccination–United States, 2013-14 influenza season. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014 Dec 12;63(49):1151-4. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6349a2.htm 
    6. Reed C, Angulo FJ, Swerdlow DL, et al. Estimates of the Prevalence of Pandemic (H1N1) 2009, United States, April–July 2009. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15(12):2004-2007. https://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1512.091413
    7. Devine O, Pham H, Gunnels B, et al. Extrapolating Sentinel Surveillance Information to Estimate National COVID-19 Hospital Admission Rates: A Bayesian Modeling Approach. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/irv.70026. Volume18, Issue10. October 2024.
    8. https://www.cdc.gov/covid/php/covid-net/index.html">COVID-NET | COVID-19 | CDC 
    9. https://www.cdc.gov/covid/hcp/clinical-care/systematic-review-process.html 
    10. https://academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/article/1/3/pgac079/6604394?login=false">Excess natural-cause deaths in California by cause and setting: March 2020 through February 2021 | PNAS Nexus | Oxford Academic (oup.com)
    11. Kruschke, J. K. 2011. Doing Bayesian data analysis: a tutorial with R and BUGS. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Section 3.3.5.

  12. d

    ARCHIVED: COVID-19 Cases and Deaths Summarized by Geography

    • catalog.data.gov
    Updated Mar 29, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    data.sfgov.org (2025). ARCHIVED: COVID-19 Cases and Deaths Summarized by Geography [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/covid-19-cases-and-deaths-summarized-by-geography
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 29, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    data.sfgov.org
    Description

    A. SUMMARY Medical provider confirmed COVID-19 cases and confirmed COVID-19 related deaths in San Francisco, CA aggregated by several different geographic areas and normalized by 2016-2020 American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year estimates for population data to calculate rate per 10,000 residents. On September 12, 2021, a new case definition of COVID-19 was introduced that includes criteria for enumerating new infections after previous probable or confirmed infections (also known as reinfections). A reinfection is defined as a confirmed positive PCR lab test more than 90 days after a positive PCR or antigen test. The first reinfection case was identified on December 7, 2021. Cases and deaths are both mapped to the residence of the individual, not to where they were infected or died. For example, if one was infected in San Francisco at work but lives in the East Bay, those are not counted as SF Cases or if one dies in Zuckerberg San Francisco General but is from another county, that is also not counted in this dataset. Dataset is cumulative and covers cases going back to 3/2/2020 when testing began. Geographic areas summarized are: 1. Analysis Neighborhoods 2. Census Tracts 3. Census Zip Code Tabulation Areas B. HOW THE DATASET IS CREATED Addresses from medical data are geocoded by the San Francisco Department of Public Health (SFDPH). Those addresses are spatially joined to the geographic areas. Counts are generated based on the number of address points that match each geographic area. The 2016-2020 American Community Survey (ACS) population estimates provided by the Census are used to create a rate which is equal to ([count] / [acs_population]) * 10000) representing the number of cases per 10,000 residents. C. UPDATE PROCESS Geographic analysis is scripted by SFDPH staff and synced to this dataset daily at 7:30 Pacific Time. D. HOW TO USE THIS DATASET San Francisco population estimates for geographic regions can be found in a view based on the San Francisco Population and Demographic Census dataset. These population estimates are from the 2016-2020 5-year American Community Survey (ACS). Privacy rules in effect To protect privacy, certain rules are in effect: 1. Case counts greater than 0 and less than 10 are dropped - these will be null (blank) values 2. Death counts greater than 0 and less than 10 are dropped - these will be null (blank) values 3. Cases and deaths dropped altogether for areas where acs_population < 1000 Rate suppression in effect where counts lower than 20 Rates are not calculated unless the case count is greater than or equal to 20. Rates are generally unstable at small numbers, so we avoid calculating them directly. We advise you to apply the same approach as this is best practice in epidemiology. A note on Census ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTAs) ZIP Code Tabulation Areas are special boundaries created by the U.S. Census based on ZIP Codes developed by the USPS. They are not, however, the same thing. ZCTAs are areal representations of routes. Read how the Census develops ZCTAs on their website. Row included for Citywide case counts, incidence rate, and deaths A single row is included that has the Citywide case counts and incidence rate. This can be used for comparisons. Citywide will capture all cases regardless of address quality. While some cases cannot be mapped to sub-areas like Census Tracts, ongo

  13. Data_Sheet_1_Adjusting Reported COVID-19 Deaths for the Prevailing Routine...

    • frontiersin.figshare.com
    docx
    Updated Jun 1, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Hemant Deepak Shewade; Giridara Gopal Parameswaran; Archisman Mazumder; Mohak Gupta (2023). Data_Sheet_1_Adjusting Reported COVID-19 Deaths for the Prevailing Routine Death Surveillance in India.docx [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.641991.s001
    Explore at:
    docxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Frontiers Mediahttp://www.frontiersin.org/
    Authors
    Hemant Deepak Shewade; Giridara Gopal Parameswaran; Archisman Mazumder; Mohak Gupta
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    India
    Description

    In India, the “low mortality” narrative based on the reported COVID-19 deaths may be causing more harm than benefit. The extent to which COVID-19 deaths get reported depends on the coverage of routine death surveillance [death registration along with medical certification of cause of death (MCCD)] and the errors in MCCD. In India, the coverage of routine death surveillance is 18.1%. This is compounded by the fact that COVID-19 death reporting is focused among reported cases and the case detection ratio is low. To adjust for the coverage of routine death surveillance and errors in MCCD, we calculated a correction (multiplication) factor at national and state level to produce an estimated number of COVID-19 deaths. As on July 31, 2020, we calculated the infection fatality ratio (IFR) for India (0.58:100–1.16:100) using these estimated COVID-19 deaths; this is comparable with the IFR range in countries with near perfect routine death surveillance. We recommend the release of excess deaths data during COVID-19 (at least in states with high death registration) and post-mortem COVID-19 testing as a surveillance activity for a better understanding of under-reporting. In its absence, we should adjust reported COVID-19 deaths for the coverage of routine death surveillance and errors in MCCD. This way we will have a clear idea of the true burden of deaths and our public health response will never be inadequate. We recommend that “reported” or “estimated” is added before the COVID-19 death data and related indicators for better clarity and interpretation.

  14. f

    Estimates of age dependent ascertainment rates, risk of severe, critical...

    • figshare.com
    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    zip
    Updated Jun 10, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Andrea Parisi; Samuel P. C. Brand; Joe Hilton; Rabia Aziza; Matt J. Keeling; D. James Nokes (2023). Estimates of age dependent ascertainment rates, risk of severe, critical cases, death risks and infection fatality ratio from Spanish and Italian data. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009090.s002
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 10, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS Computational Biology
    Authors
    Andrea Parisi; Samuel P. C. Brand; Joe Hilton; Rabia Aziza; Matt J. Keeling; D. James Nokes
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Includes the R markdown for producing estimates and the required data files. (ZIP)

  15. COVID-19 infection and death rates per 100,000 population in Italy as of...

    • statista.com
    Updated Jul 8, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2020). COVID-19 infection and death rates per 100,000 population in Italy as of June 2020 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1119146/covid-19-infection-and-death-rates-per-100-000-inhabitants-italy/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 8, 2020
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2020
    Area covered
    Italy
    Description

    As of July 8, 2020, the total number of coronavirus (COVID-19) cases reached nearly 242 thousand, while the number of deaths stood at approximately 35 thousand. This means that the infection rate per 100 thousand population was 400.4, while the death rate per 100 thousand population was 57.7. Both figures were among the highest recorded worldwide. In fact, Italy was one of the worst hit countries by the pandemic.

  16. Table with input parameters to the combined SEIRS, hospital and home care...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 10, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Steen Rasmussen; Michael Skytte Petersen; Niels Høiby (2023). Table with input parameters to the combined SEIRS, hospital and home care model. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249733.t001
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 10, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Steen Rasmussen; Michael Skytte Petersen; Niels Høiby
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Table with input parameters to the combined SEIRS, hospital and home care model.

  17. f

    Characteristics and rates for Indiana residents tested for, infected with,...

    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    • plos.figshare.com
    Updated Jul 23, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Roberts, Anna R.; Grannis, Shaun J.; Embi, Peter J.; Lembcke, Lauren R.; Valvi, Nimish; Dixon, Brian E. (2021). Characteristics and rates for Indiana residents tested for, infected with, hospitalized with, and death following infection from COVID-19 through December 31, 2020; State of Indiana. [Dataset]. https://datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov/dataset?q=0000759311
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 23, 2021
    Authors
    Roberts, Anna R.; Grannis, Shaun J.; Embi, Peter J.; Lembcke, Lauren R.; Valvi, Nimish; Dixon, Brian E.
    Area covered
    Indiana
    Description

    Characteristics and rates for Indiana residents tested for, infected with, hospitalized with, and death following infection from COVID-19 through December 31, 2020; State of Indiana.

  18. f

    Data_Sheet_1_A global analysis of COVID-19 infection fatality rate and its...

    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    • frontiersin.figshare.com
    Updated Jun 2, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Phan, Thanh-Phuc; Chang, Yao-Mao; Huy, Le Duc; Ou, Tsong-Yih; Nguyen, Nhi Thi Hong; Huang, Chung-Chien; Shih, Chung-Liang (2023). Data_Sheet_1_A global analysis of COVID-19 infection fatality rate and its associated factors during the Delta and Omicron variant periods: an ecological study.docx [Dataset]. https://datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov/dataset?q=0001018796
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 2, 2023
    Authors
    Phan, Thanh-Phuc; Chang, Yao-Mao; Huy, Le Duc; Ou, Tsong-Yih; Nguyen, Nhi Thi Hong; Huang, Chung-Chien; Shih, Chung-Liang
    Description

    BackgroundThe Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 is more highly infectious and transmissible than prior variants of concern. It was unclear which factors might have contributed to the alteration of COVID-19 cases and deaths during the Delta and Omicron variant periods. This study aimed to compare the COVID-19 average weekly infection fatality rate (AWIFR), investigate factors associated with COVID-19 AWIFR, and explore the factors linked to the increase in COVID-19 AWIFR between two periods of Delta and Omicron variants.Materials and methodsAn ecological study has been conducted among 110 countries over the first 12 weeks during two periods of Delta and Omicron variant dominance using open publicly available datasets. Our analysis included 102 countries in the Delta period and 107 countries in the Omicron period. Linear mixed-effects models and linear regression models were used to explore factors associated with the variation of AWIFR over Delta and Omicron periods.FindingsDuring the Delta period, the lower AWIFR was witnessed in countries with better government effectiveness index [β = −0.762, 95% CI (−1.238)–(−0.287)] and higher proportion of the people fully vaccinated [β = −0.385, 95% CI (−0.629)–(−0.141)]. In contrast, a higher burden of cardiovascular diseases was positively associated with AWIFR (β = 0.517, 95% CI 0.102–0.932). Over the Omicron period, while years lived with disability (YLD) caused by metabolism disorders (β = 0.843, 95% CI 0.486–1.2), the proportion of the population aged older than 65 years (β = 0.737, 95% CI 0.237–1.238) was positively associated with poorer AWIFR, and the high proportion of the population vaccinated with a booster dose [β = −0.321, 95% CI (−0.624)–(−0.018)] was linked with the better outcome. Over two periods of Delta and Omicron, the increase in government effectiveness index was associated with a decrease in AWIFR [β = −0.438, 95% CI (−0.750)–(−0.126)]; whereas, higher death rates caused by diabetes and kidney (β = 0.472, 95% CI 0.089–0.855) and percentage of population aged older than 65 years (β = 0.407, 95% CI 0.013–0.802) were associated with a significant increase in AWIFR.ConclusionThe COVID-19 infection fatality rates were strongly linked with the coverage of vaccination rate, effectiveness of government, and health burden related to chronic diseases. Therefore, proper policies for the improvement of vaccination coverage and support of vulnerable groups could substantially mitigate the burden of COVID-19.

  19. Deaths Involving COVID-19 by Vaccination Status

    • open.canada.ca
    • gimi9.com
    • +1more
    csv, docx, html, xlsx
    Updated Nov 12, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Government of Ontario (2025). Deaths Involving COVID-19 by Vaccination Status [Dataset]. https://open.canada.ca/data/dataset/1375bb00-6454-4d3e-a723-4ae9e849d655
    Explore at:
    docx, csv, html, xlsxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 12, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Government of Ontariohttps://www.ontario.ca/
    License

    Open Government Licence - Canada 2.0https://open.canada.ca/en/open-government-licence-canada
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Mar 1, 2021 - Nov 12, 2024
    Description

    This dataset reports the daily reported number of the 7-day moving average rates of Deaths involving COVID-19 by vaccination status and by age group. Learn how the Government of Ontario is helping to keep Ontarians safe during the 2019 Novel Coronavirus outbreak. Effective November 14, 2024 this page will no longer be updated. Information about COVID-19 and other respiratory viruses is available on Public Health Ontario’s interactive respiratory virus tool: https://www.publichealthontario.ca/en/Data-and-Analysis/Infectious-Disease/Respiratory-Virus-Tool Data includes: * Date on which the death occurred * Age group * 7-day moving average of the last seven days of the death rate per 100,000 for those not fully vaccinated * 7-day moving average of the last seven days of the death rate per 100,000 for those fully vaccinated * 7-day moving average of the last seven days of the death rate per 100,000 for those vaccinated with at least one booster ##Additional notes As of June 16, all COVID-19 datasets will be updated weekly on Thursdays by 2pm. As of January 12, 2024, data from the date of January 1, 2024 onwards reflect updated population estimates. This update specifically impacts data for the 'not fully vaccinated' category. On November 30, 2023 the count of COVID-19 deaths was updated to include missing historical deaths from January 15, 2020 to March 31, 2023. CCM is a dynamic disease reporting system which allows ongoing update to data previously entered. As a result, data extracted from CCM represents a snapshot at the time of extraction and may differ from previous or subsequent results. Public Health Units continually clean up COVID-19 data, correcting for missing or overcounted cases and deaths. These corrections can result in data spikes and current totals being different from previously reported cases and deaths. Observed trends over time should be interpreted with caution for the most recent period due to reporting and/or data entry lags. The data does not include vaccination data for people who did not provide consent for vaccination records to be entered into the provincial COVaxON system. This includes individual records as well as records from some Indigenous communities where those communities have not consented to including vaccination information in COVaxON. “Not fully vaccinated” category includes people with no vaccine and one dose of double-dose vaccine. “People with one dose of double-dose vaccine” category has a small and constantly changing number. The combination will stabilize the results. Spikes, negative numbers and other data anomalies: Due to ongoing data entry and data quality assurance activities in Case and Contact Management system (CCM) file, Public Health Units continually clean up COVID-19, correcting for missing or overcounted cases and deaths. These corrections can result in data spikes, negative numbers and current totals being different from previously reported case and death counts. Public Health Units report cause of death in the CCM based on information available to them at the time of reporting and in accordance with definitions provided by Public Health Ontario. The medical certificate of death is the official record and the cause of death could be different. Deaths are defined per the outcome field in CCM marked as “Fatal”. Deaths in COVID-19 cases identified as unrelated to COVID-19 are not included in the Deaths involving COVID-19 reported. Rates for the most recent days are subject to reporting lags All data reflects totals from 8 p.m. the previous day. This dataset is subject to change.

  20. Rates of COVID-19 Cases or Deaths by Age Group and Vaccination Status and...

    • data.cdc.gov
    • healthdata.gov
    • +1more
    csv, xlsx, xml
    Updated Feb 22, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    CDC COVID-19 Response, Epidemiology Task Force (2023). Rates of COVID-19 Cases or Deaths by Age Group and Vaccination Status and Second Booster Dose [Dataset]. https://data.cdc.gov/Public-Health-Surveillance/Rates-of-COVID-19-Cases-or-Deaths-by-Age-Group-and/ukww-au2k
    Explore at:
    xlsx, xml, csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 22, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Centers for Disease Control and Preventionhttp://www.cdc.gov/
    Authors
    CDC COVID-19 Response, Epidemiology Task Force
    Description

    Data for CDC’s COVID Data Tracker site on Rates of COVID-19 Cases and Deaths by Vaccination Status. Click 'More' for important dataset description and footnotes

    Dataset and data visualization details: These data were posted on October 21, 2022, archived on November 18, 2022, and revised on February 22, 2023. These data reflect cases among persons with a positive specimen collection date through September 24, 2022, and deaths among persons with a positive specimen collection date through September 3, 2022.

    Vaccination status: A person vaccinated with a primary series had SARS-CoV-2 RNA or antigen detected on a respiratory specimen collected ≥14 days after verifiably completing the primary series of an FDA-authorized or approved COVID-19 vaccine. An unvaccinated person had SARS-CoV-2 RNA or antigen detected on a respiratory specimen and has not been verified to have received COVID-19 vaccine. Excluded were partially vaccinated people who received at least one FDA-authorized vaccine dose but did not complete a primary series ≥14 days before collection of a specimen where SARS-CoV-2 RNA or antigen was detected. Additional or booster dose: A person vaccinated with a primary series and an additional or booster dose had SARS-CoV-2 RNA or antigen detected on a respiratory specimen collected ≥14 days after receipt of an additional or booster dose of any COVID-19 vaccine on or after August 13, 2021. For people ages 18 years and older, data are graphed starting the week including September 24, 2021, when a COVID-19 booster dose was first recommended by CDC for adults 65+ years old and people in certain populations and high risk occupational and institutional settings. For people ages 12-17 years, data are graphed starting the week of December 26, 2021, 2 weeks after the first recommendation for a booster dose for adolescents ages 16-17 years. For people ages 5-11 years, data are included starting the week of June 5, 2022, 2 weeks after the first recommendation for a booster dose for children aged 5-11 years. For people ages 50 years and older, data on second booster doses are graphed starting the week including March 29, 2022, when the recommendation was made for second boosters. Vertical lines represent dates when changes occurred in U.S. policy for COVID-19 vaccination (details provided above). Reporting is by primary series vaccine type rather than additional or booster dose vaccine type. The booster dose vaccine type may be different than the primary series vaccine type. ** Because data on the immune status of cases and associated deaths are unavailable, an additional dose in an immunocompromised person cannot be distinguished from a booster dose. This is a relevant consideration because vaccines can be less effective in this group. Deaths: A COVID-19–associated death occurred in a person with a documented COVID-19 diagnosis who died; health department staff reviewed to make a determination using vital records, public health investigation, or other data sources. Rates of COVID-19 deaths by vaccination status are reported based on when the patient was tested for COVID-19, not the date they died. Deaths usually occur up to 30 days after COVID-19 diagnosis. Participating jurisdictions: Currently, these 31 health departments that regularly link their case surveillance to immunization information system data are included in these incidence rate estimates: Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, New York City (New York), North Carolina, Philadelphia (Pennsylvania), Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Washington, and West Virginia; 30 jurisdictions also report deaths among vaccinated and unvaccinated people. These jurisdictions represent 72% of the total U.S. population and all ten of the Health and Human Services Regions. Data on cases among people who received additional or booster doses were reported from 31 jurisdictions; 30 jurisdictions also reported data on deaths among people who received one or more additional or booster dose; 28 jurisdictions reported cases among people who received two or more additional or booster doses; and 26 jurisdictions reported deaths among people who received two or more additional or booster doses. This list will be updated as more jurisdictions participate. Incidence rate estimates: Weekly age-specific incidence rates by vaccination status were calculated as the number of cases or deaths divided by the number of people vaccinated with a primary series, overall or with/without a booster dose (cumulative) or unvaccinated (obtained by subtracting the cumulative number of people vaccinated with a primary series and partially vaccinated people from the 2019 U.S. intercensal population estimates) and multiplied by 100,000. Overall incidence rates were age-standardized using the 2000 U.S. Census standard population. To estimate population counts for ages 6 months through 1 year, half of the single-year population counts for ages 0 through 1 year were used. All rates are plotted by positive specimen collection date to reflect when incident infections occurred. For the primary series analysis, age-standardized rates include ages 12 years and older from April 4, 2021 through December 4, 2021, ages 5 years and older from December 5, 2021 through July 30, 2022 and ages 6 months and older from July 31, 2022 onwards. For the booster dose analysis, age-standardized rates include ages 18 years and older from September 19, 2021 through December 25, 2021, ages 12 years and older from December 26, 2021, and ages 5 years and older from June 5, 2022 onwards. Small numbers could contribute to less precision when calculating death rates among some groups. Continuity correction: A continuity correction has been applied to the denominators by capping the percent population coverage at 95%. To do this, we assumed that at least 5% of each age group would always be unvaccinated in each jurisdiction. Adding this correction ensures that there is always a reasonable denominator for the unvaccinated population that would prevent incidence and death rates from growing unrealistically large due to potential overestimates of vaccination coverage. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs): IRRs for the past one month were calculated by dividing the average weekly incidence rates among unvaccinated people by that among people vaccinated with a primary series either overall or with a booster dose. Publications: Scobie HM, Johnson AG, Suthar AB, et al. Monitoring Incidence of COVID-19 Cases, Hospitalizations, and Deaths, by Vaccination Status — 13 U.S. Jurisdictions, April 4–July 17, 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2021;70:1284–1290. Johnson AG, Amin AB, Ali AR, et al. COVID-19 Incidence and Death Rates Among Unvaccinated and Fully Vaccinated Adults with and Without Booster Doses During Periods of Delta and Omicron Variant Emergence — 25 U.S. Jurisdictions, April 4–December 25, 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022;71:132–138

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Statista (2024). COVID-19 death rates in the United States as of March 10, 2023, by state [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1109011/coronavirus-covid19-death-rates-us-by-state/
Organization logo

COVID-19 death rates in the United States as of March 10, 2023, by state

Explore at:
29 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
Dataset updated
May 15, 2024
Dataset authored and provided by
Statistahttp://statista.com/
Area covered
United States
Description

As of March 10, 2023, the death rate from COVID-19 in the state of New York was 397 per 100,000 people. New York is one of the states with the highest number of COVID-19 cases.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu