13 datasets found
  1. Comparison of select COVID-19 vaccines 2022, by efficacy

    • statista.com
    Updated Mar 7, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Comparison of select COVID-19 vaccines 2022, by efficacy [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1301122/covid-vaccines-comparison-by-efficacy/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 7, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    As of February 2022, mRNA-based vaccine Comirnaty, developed by Pfizer/Biontech, was the leading COVID-19 vaccine by efficacy rate, showing around 95 percent of efficacy against COVID-19. This statistic illustrates the comparison of select COVID-19 vaccines worldwide, by efficacy.

  2. Comparison of select COVID-19 vaccines worldwide 2022, by efficacy against...

    • statista.com
    Updated Apr 11, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2022). Comparison of select COVID-19 vaccines worldwide 2022, by efficacy against Delta [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1301141/covid-vaccines-comparison-by-efficacy-against-delta-worldwide/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 11, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    As of February 2022, the latest COVID-19 vaccine by Sanofi/GlaxoSmithKline showed a 77 percent efficacy against the Delta variant of the coronavirus. This statistic illustrates the comparison of select COVID-19 vaccines worldwide, by their efficacy against the Delta variant.

  3. COVID-19 vaccine comparison adverse events Biontech vs Moderna 2020

    • statista.com
    Updated Dec 16, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2020). COVID-19 vaccine comparison adverse events Biontech vs Moderna 2020 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1193695/covid-vaccine-moderna-vs-biontech-severe-adverse-events/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 16, 2020
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    As of mid-December 2020, the COVID-19 vaccine from the Biontech/Pfizer cooperation showed significant lower rates of severe adverse events than Moderna's product, with the exception of chills where Moderna showed a lower rate. During November, both sites reported nearly the exact same efficacy of around 95 percent of their vaccines.

  4. f

    BNT162b2 covid-19 vaccine summary of findings table (RCT).

    • figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Dec 4, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Sumayyah Ebrahim; Ntombifuthi Blose; Natasha Gloeck; Ameer Hohlfeld; Yusentha Balakrishna; Rudzani Muloiwa; Andy Gray; Andy Parrish; Karen Cohen; Ruth Lancaster; Tamara Kredo (2023). BNT162b2 covid-19 vaccine summary of findings table (RCT). [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0002676.t001
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 4, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS Global Public Health
    Authors
    Sumayyah Ebrahim; Ntombifuthi Blose; Natasha Gloeck; Ameer Hohlfeld; Yusentha Balakrishna; Rudzani Muloiwa; Andy Gray; Andy Parrish; Karen Cohen; Ruth Lancaster; Tamara Kredo
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    BNT162b2 covid-19 vaccine summary of findings table (RCT).

  5. f

    BNT162b2 covid-19 vaccine summary of findings table (observational).

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Dec 4, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Sumayyah Ebrahim; Ntombifuthi Blose; Natasha Gloeck; Ameer Hohlfeld; Yusentha Balakrishna; Rudzani Muloiwa; Andy Gray; Andy Parrish; Karen Cohen; Ruth Lancaster; Tamara Kredo (2023). BNT162b2 covid-19 vaccine summary of findings table (observational). [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0002676.t002
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 4, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS Global Public Health
    Authors
    Sumayyah Ebrahim; Ntombifuthi Blose; Natasha Gloeck; Ameer Hohlfeld; Yusentha Balakrishna; Rudzani Muloiwa; Andy Gray; Andy Parrish; Karen Cohen; Ruth Lancaster; Tamara Kredo
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    BNT162b2 covid-19 vaccine summary of findings table (observational).

  6. f

    Table 5_Intersecting SARS-CoV-2 spike mutations and global vaccine efficacy...

    • frontiersin.figshare.com
    xlsx
    Updated Mar 7, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Samaneh Tokhanbigli; Samira Salami Ghaleh; Karim Rahimian; Mohammadamin Mahmanzar; Saleha Bayat; Shahrzad Ahangarzadeh; Bahman Moradi; Reza Mahmanzar; Yunliang Wang; Brian Gregory George Oliver; Youping Deng (2025). Table 5_Intersecting SARS-CoV-2 spike mutations and global vaccine efficacy against COVID-19.xlsx [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1435873.s005
    Explore at:
    xlsxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 7, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Frontiers
    Authors
    Samaneh Tokhanbigli; Samira Salami Ghaleh; Karim Rahimian; Mohammadamin Mahmanzar; Saleha Bayat; Shahrzad Ahangarzadeh; Bahman Moradi; Reza Mahmanzar; Yunliang Wang; Brian Gregory George Oliver; Youping Deng
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    In line with encountering the world with the emergence of vaccine-resistance variants of SARS-CoV-2, 15,669,529 samples that received COVID-19 vaccines until April 2023 were investigated as two doses in the first phase and booster vaccinations in the second phase. The analysis shows that D614G and P681 mutations occurred in both phases. The E484 and Y655 mutations significantly emerged during the second phase. The 762-889 and 254-381 regions are revealed as conserved parts and could be considered in vaccine design. The Kruskal–Wallis test revealed a significant reduction in single mutations between populations with 20%–50% and those with 70%–100% vaccination coverage (p=0.017). The Mann–Whitney U test proposes a link between vaccination and suppression of viral mutation rates. Dynamic modeling suggests that key mutations have facilitated the virus’ evolution and immune escape. The study’s findings are crucial for understanding virus genome mutations, especially E614 and P681 in Delta and E484 and H655 in Omicron. This highlights the need to adjust strategies and strengthen global efforts in combating the pandemic.

  7. Number of COVID-19 vaccine doses produced in China 2021-2022

    • statista.com
    Updated Nov 26, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2023). Number of COVID-19 vaccine doses produced in China 2021-2022 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1306832/china-covid19-vaccine-production-figures/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 26, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Apr 2021 - Jan 2022
    Area covered
    China
    Description

    By the end of January 2022, almost five billion COVID-19 vaccine doses were manufactured in China, making the country by far the largest producer of COVID-19 vaccines globally. While most vaccines were for domestic use, a considerable portion of vaccines was exported via sales and donations, mainly to lower or middle-income countries. In comparison to western mRNA vaccines such as Comirnaty or Spikevax, inactivated COVID-19 vaccines developed by Sinovac and Sinopharm have a lower efficacy rate.

  8. f

    Table 1_COVID-19 vaccination survey and anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG responses in a...

    • frontiersin.figshare.com
    xlsx
    Updated Nov 18, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Mimi Niu; Yi Mu; Moses Adriko; Rowel Candia; Malcolm K. Jones; Donald P. McManus; Thomas G. Egwang; Pengfei Cai (2024). Table 1_COVID-19 vaccination survey and anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG responses in a human cohort from Schistosoma mansoni-endemic villages in Mayuge District, Uganda: a cross-sectional study.xlsx [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1437063.s001
    Explore at:
    xlsxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 18, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Frontiers
    Authors
    Mimi Niu; Yi Mu; Moses Adriko; Rowel Candia; Malcolm K. Jones; Donald P. McManus; Thomas G. Egwang; Pengfei Cai
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Mayuge
    Description

    IntroductionThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in devastating health and economic consequences worldwide. Vaccination has been a central pillar for COVID-19 prevention and control. Understanding the immunomodulatory effects of helminth infections on COVID-19 vaccine-induced immune responses and vaccine efficacy is crucial to the development and deployment of effective vaccination strategies in low- and middle-income countries with a high prevalence of worms.MethodsIn September 2022, we conducted a cross-sectional, population-based survey in five Schistosoma mansoni endemic villages in Mayuge District, Uganda (n = 450). The prevalence of schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminths was determined by the Kato-Katz (KK) technique on two stool samples collected from each participant. A subset of individuals (n = 204) were interviewed in a COVID-19 vaccination survey. IgG levels against the SARS-CoV-2 spike S1 subunit (anti-S1 IgG) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in collected serum samples.ResultsThe overall schistosomiasis and hookworm prevalence rates in the five villages were 36.4% (166/450) and 36.9% (168/450), respectively. Within the cohort, 69.78% (314/450) of the subjects had a positive anti-S1 IgG response. COVID-19 vaccination coverage among the interviewed participants was 93.14% (190/204; 95% CI, 88.8% − 95.9%). However, 81% (154/190) of COVID-19 vaccinees had an anti-S1 IgG titre ≤200. In an adolescent group receiving a single dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine (n = 23), an inverse correlation was observed between anti-S1 IgG antibody level/titre and faecal egg count. Within the above group, anti-S1 IgG levels/titres were significantly lower in subjects with moderate or heavy S. mansoni infection (n = 5) than those in KK-negative individuals (n = 9).ConclusionAlthough the acceptance rate of COVID-19 vaccination was high, the majority of participants received only a single vaccine dose and the overall anti-S1 IgG titres in confirmed vaccinees were low. Moderate-to-heavy schistosome infections blunted the antibody responses following vaccination with a single dose of BNT162b2. These observations confirm the necessity for a second COVID-19 vaccine dose for two-dose primary immunization series and call for implementation research that may inform the development of a ‘treat and vaccinate’ policy during vaccination roll-out in regions with heavy worm burdens.

  9. f

    Additional file 3 of COVID-19 vaccine update: vaccine effectiveness,...

    • springernature.figshare.com
    xlsx
    Updated Jun 13, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Wei-Yu Chi; Yen-Der Li; Hsin-Che Huang; Timothy En Haw Chan; Sih-Yao Chow; Jun-Han Su; Louise Ferrall; Chien-Fu Hung; T.-C. Wu (2023). Additional file 3 of COVID-19 vaccine update: vaccine effectiveness, SARS-CoV-2 variants, boosters, adverse effects, and immune correlates of protection [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21341619.v1
    Explore at:
    xlsxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 13, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    figshare
    Authors
    Wei-Yu Chi; Yen-Der Li; Hsin-Che Huang; Timothy En Haw Chan; Sih-Yao Chow; Jun-Han Su; Louise Ferrall; Chien-Fu Hung; T.-C. Wu
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Additional file 3: Table S3. Vaccine booster effectiveness against viral variants. Studies of vaccine booster effectiveness against viral variants. Related to Table 2.

  10. f

    Table 1_Distinct response patterns of endothelial markers to the BNT162b2...

    • frontiersin.figshare.com
    docx
    Updated Jan 6, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Beatriz Castro-Robles; Francisco J. Cimas; Lourdes Arias-Salazar; Jesús Ontañón; Julia Lozano; Susana López-López; Fernando Andrés-Pretel; María Ángeles Requena-Calleja; Antonio Mas; Gemma Serrano-Heras; Tomás Segura; Javier Solera (2025). Table 1_Distinct response patterns of endothelial markers to the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 booster vaccine are associated with the spike-specific IgG antibody production.docx [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1471401.s001
    Explore at:
    docxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 6, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Frontiers
    Authors
    Beatriz Castro-Robles; Francisco J. Cimas; Lourdes Arias-Salazar; Jesús Ontañón; Julia Lozano; Susana López-López; Fernando Andrés-Pretel; María Ángeles Requena-Calleja; Antonio Mas; Gemma Serrano-Heras; Tomás Segura; Javier Solera
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    IntroductionDespite the efficacy and safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, inflammatory and/or thrombotic episodes have been reported. Since the impact of COVID-19 vaccines on the endothelium remains uncertain, our objective was to assess endothelial activation status before and 90 days after the third dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine.MethodsA prospective longitudinal study was conducted at University General Hospital of Albacete, involving 38 healthy health-care workers. Serum levels of endothelial markers (endocan and sVCAM-1) and spike S1-specific IgG antibodies were determined before and at 7, 15, 24 and 90days following vaccination. To analyze each participant´s individual response, we calculated relative increases/decreases (delta values) in endothelial markers and antibodies concentrations compared to their pre-vaccination levels.ResultsWe identified two significantly distinct profiles of endothelial markers response, characterized by either increased or decreased serum levels of endocan and sVCAM. Incremental and decremental response groups did not differ in terms of age, sex, cardiovascular risk factors, previous SARS-CoV-2 infection and influenza vaccine co-administration. However, these responses were significantly associated with the relative spike-specific antibody production. Specifically, the greatest relative increase in antibodies was found in the decremental responders. Additionally, the higher delta antibody production was observed in non-previously infected individualsConclusionAdministration of the BNT162b2 booster vaccine triggered a non-homogenous response of endothelial function markers among the study participants. Our findings improve the understanding of individual responses to the mRNA COVID-19 booster vaccine, which could be useful in assessing the need for booster doses, particularly in population at risk of vascular complications.

  11. f

    Potential factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy....

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 14, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Debendra Nath Roy; Mohitosh Biswas; Ekramul Islam; Md. Shah Azam (2023). Potential factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265496.t001
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 14, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Debendra Nath Roy; Mohitosh Biswas; Ekramul Islam; Md. Shah Azam
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Potential factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy.

  12. f

    Table showing the incidence rate of COVID-19 infections and hazard ratios...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 13, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Aashish Contractor; Shashikala Shivaprakash; Anjali Tiwari; Maninder Singh Setia; Tarang Gianchandani (2023). Table showing the incidence rate of COVID-19 infections and hazard ratios (with 95% confidence intervals) in a cohort of 2762 health care personnel in a tertiary care centre, Mumbai, India. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276759.t002
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 13, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Aashish Contractor; Shashikala Shivaprakash; Anjali Tiwari; Maninder Singh Setia; Tarang Gianchandani
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Mumbai, India
    Description

    Table showing the incidence rate of COVID-19 infections and hazard ratios (with 95% confidence intervals) in a cohort of 2762 health care personnel in a tertiary care centre, Mumbai, India.

  13. f

    Table 3_Influence of government policies on handwashing and vaccine uptake...

    • frontiersin.figshare.com
    docx
    Updated Dec 18, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Josphat Martin Muchangi; James Mturi; Hajra Mukasa; Kioko Kithuki; Sarah Jebet Kosgei; Lennah Muhoja Kanyangi; Rogers Moraro; Samuel Kamau; Maureen Nankanja (2024). Table 3_Influence of government policies on handwashing and vaccine uptake in Kenya, Uganda, and Tanzania to prevent and control COVID-19: a systematic review.docx [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1417866.s003
    Explore at:
    docxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 18, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Frontiers
    Authors
    Josphat Martin Muchangi; James Mturi; Hajra Mukasa; Kioko Kithuki; Sarah Jebet Kosgei; Lennah Muhoja Kanyangi; Rogers Moraro; Samuel Kamau; Maureen Nankanja
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda
    Description

    IntroductionThe government's role in influencing policies related to Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine distribution and handwashing practices is essential in controlling the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.MethodsThis study aimed to systematically review published studies to explore the influence of government policies on handwashing and vaccine uptake in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania to prevent and control COVID-19. A comprehensive search strategy was applied across three databases, and eligibility was determined using strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. We reviewed 9 of 136 research papers following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines.ResultsThe findings revealed that the government has a role in influencing policies related to COVID-19 vaccine distribution and handwashing uptake. Employment of public health campaigns and communication strategies by the government in Uganda increased vaccine acceptance and hand hygiene uptake. Similarly, government efforts to make hand hygiene accessible increased the uptake of handwashing in Tanzania. In Kenya, government efforts to increase access to soap and clean water in informal settlements and markets resulted in increased adherence to handwashing practices. Further, government incentives such as cash increased vaccination rates while vaccination reminders combined with cash incentives increased childhood immunization coverage.DiscussionOverall, this review indicates that monitoring and enforcing compliance increases vaccine and handwashing uptake across the three countries. The effectiveness of government policies on handwashing and vaccine uptake is influenced by factors such as safety, efficacy and access to information, among others. Therefore, there is a need to address these factors for the successful implementation of these policies.Systematic review RegistrationPROSPERO ID CRD42023396319, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.

  14. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Comparison of select COVID-19 vaccines 2022, by efficacy [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1301122/covid-vaccines-comparison-by-efficacy/
Organization logo

Comparison of select COVID-19 vaccines 2022, by efficacy

Explore at:
Dataset updated
Mar 7, 2023
Dataset authored and provided by
Statistahttp://statista.com/
Area covered
Worldwide
Description

As of February 2022, mRNA-based vaccine Comirnaty, developed by Pfizer/Biontech, was the leading COVID-19 vaccine by efficacy rate, showing around 95 percent of efficacy against COVID-19. This statistic illustrates the comparison of select COVID-19 vaccines worldwide, by efficacy.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu