An effective policy response to the economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic requires an enormous range of data to inform the design and response of programs. Public health measures require data on the spread of the disease, beliefs in the population, and capacity of the health system. Relief efforts depend on an understanding of hardships being faced by various segments of the population. Food policy requires measurement of agricultural production and hunger. In such a rapidly evolving pandemic, these data must be collected at a high frequency. Given the unexpected nature of the shock and urgency with which a response was required, Indian policymakers needed to formulate policies affecting India's 1.4 billion people, without the detailed evidence required to construct effective programs. To help overcome this evidence gap, the World Bank, IDinsight, and the Development Data Lab sought to produce rigorous and responsive data for policymakers across six states in India: Jharkhand, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, and Madhya Pradesh.
Jharkhand, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, and Madhya Pradesh
Household
Sample survey data [ssd]
The samples for these surveys were drawn from surveys and impact evaluations previously conducted by the World Bank, the Ministry of Rural Development, India and IDInsight. A detailed note on the sampling frames is available for download.
Details will be made available after all rounds of data collection and analysis is complete.
Computer Assisted Telephone Interview [cati]
The survey questionnaire consists of the following modules: - Module 0: Introduction - Module 1: Migration - Module 2: Labor and Income - Module 3: Consumption - Module 4: Agriculture - Module 5: Access to Relief - Module 6: Health
~55%
https://www.iza.org/wc/dataverse/IIL-1.0.pdfhttps://www.iza.org/wc/dataverse/IIL-1.0.pdf
WageIndicator is interviewing people around the world to discover what makes the Coronavirus lockdown easier (or tougher), and what is the COVID-19 effect on our jobs, lives and mood. WageIndicator shows coronavirus-induced changes in living and working conditions in over 110 countries on the basis of answers on the following questions among others in the Corona survey: Is your work affected by the corona crisis? Are precautionary measures taken at the workplace? Do you have to work from home? Has your workload increased/decreased? Have you lost your job/work/assignments? The survey contains questions about the home situation of respondents as well as about the possible manifestation of the corona disease in members of the household. Also the effect of having a pet in the house in corona-crisis times is included.
Public Domain Mark 1.0https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
Statistics from SPC's Public Health Division (PHD) on the number of cases of COVID-19 and the number of deaths attributed to COVID-19 in Pacific Island Countries and Territories.
Find more Pacific data on PDH.stat.
The New York Times is releasing a series of data files with cumulative counts of coronavirus cases in the United States, at the state and county level, over time. This time series data is being compiled from state and local governments and health departments in an attempt to provide a complete record of the ongoing outbreak. This deposit contains live data from three geographic levels: U.S., states and counties. ICPSR staff scraped these data on 11/22/2020. For the most current data, please visit https://github.com/nytimes/covid-19-data.
An effective policy response to the economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic requires an enormous range of data to inform the design and response of programs. Public health measures require data on the spread of the disease, beliefs in the population, and capacity of the health system. Relief efforts depend on an understanding of hardships being faced by various segments of the population. Food policy requires measurement of agricultural production and hunger. In such a rapidly evolving pandemic, these data must be collected at a high frequency. Given the unexpected nature of the shock and urgency with which a response was required, Indian policymakers needed to formulate policies affecting India’s 1.4 billion people, without the detailed evidence required to construct effective programs. To help overcome this evidence gap, the World Bank, IDinsight, and the Development Data Lab sought to produce rigorous and responsive data for policymakers across six states in India: Jharkhand, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, and Madhya Pradesh.
Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, and Uttar Pradesh
Household
Sample survey data [ssd]
This dataset includes observations covering six states (Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh) and three survey rounds. The survey did not have a single, unified frame from which to sample phone numbers. The final sample was assembled from several different sample frames, and the choice of frame sample frames varied across states and survey rounds.
These frames comprise four prior IDinsight projects and from an impact evaluation of the National Rural Livelihoods project conducted by the Ministry of Rural Development. Each of these surveys sought to represent distinct populations, and employed idiosyncratic sample designs and weighting schemes.
A detailed note covering key features of each sample frame is available for download.
Computer Assisted Telephone Interview [cati]
The survey questionnaires covered the following subjects:
Agriculture: COVID-19-related changes in price realisation, acreage decisions, input expenditure, access to credit, access to fertilisers, etc.
Income and consumption: Changes in wage rates, employment duration, consumption expenditure, prices of essential commodities, status of food security etc.
Migration: Rates of in-migration, migrant income and employment status, return migration plans etc.
Access to relief: Access to in-kind, cash and workfare relief, quantities of relief received, and constraints on the access to relief.
Health: Access to health facilities and rates of foregone healthcare, knowledge of COVID-19 related symptoms and protective behaviours.
While a number of indicators were consistent across all three rounds, questions were added and removed as and when necessary to account for seasonal changes (i.e: in the agricultural cycle).
Round 1: ~55% Round 2: ~46% Round 3: ~55%
NOTE: This dataset replaces a previous one. Please see below. Chicago residents who are up to date with COVID-19 vaccines by ZIP Code, based on the reported home address and age group of the person vaccinated, as provided by the medical provider in the Illinois Comprehensive Automated Immunization Registry Exchange (I-CARE). “Up to date” refers to individuals who meet the CDC’s updated COVID-19 vaccination criteria based on their age and prior vaccination history. For surveillance purposes, up to date is defined based on the following criteria: People ages 5 years and older: · Are up to date when they receive 1+ doses of a COVID-19 vaccine during the current season. Children ages 6 months to 4 years: · Children who have received at least two prior COVID-19 vaccine doses are up to date when they receive one additional dose of COVID-19 vaccine during the current season, regardless of vaccine product. · Children who have received only one prior COVID-19 vaccine dose are up to date when they receive one additional dose of the current season's Moderna COVID-19 vaccine or two additional doses of the current season's Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. · Children who have never received a COVID-19 vaccination are up to date when they receive either two doses of the current season's Moderna vaccine or three doses of the current season's Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. This dataset takes the place of a previous dataset, which covers doses administered from December 15, 2020 through September 13, 2023 and is marked as historical: - https://data.cityofchicago.org/Health-Human-Services/COVID-19-Vaccinations-by-ZIP-Code/553k-3xzc. Data Notes: Weekly cumulative totals of people up to date are shown for each combination ZIP Code and age group. Note there are rows where age group is "All ages" so care should be taken when summing rows. Coverage percentages are calculated based on the cumulative number of people in each ZIP Code and age group who are considered up to date as of the week ending date divided by the estimated number of people in that subgroup. Population counts are obtained from the 2020 U.S. Decennial Census. For ZIP Codes mostly outside Chicago, coverage percentages are not calculated reliable Chicago-only population counts are not available. Actual counts may exceed population estimates and lead to coverage estimates that are greater than 100%, especially in smaller ZIP Codes with smaller populations. Additionally, the medical provider may report a work address or incorrect home address for the person receiving the vaccination, which may lead to over- or underestimation of vaccination coverage by geography. All coverage percentages are capped at 99%. Weekly cumulative counts and coverage percentages are reported from the week ending Saturday, September 16, 2023 onward through the Saturday prior to the dataset being updated. All data are provisional and subject to change. Information is updated as additional details are received and it is, in fact, very common for recent dates to be incomplete and to be updated as time goes on. At any given time, this dataset reflects data currently known to CDPH. Numbers in this dataset may differ from other public sources due to when data are reported and how City of Chicago boundaries are defined. The Chicago Department of Public Health uses the most complete data available to estimate COVID-19 vaccination coverage among Chicagoans, but there are several limitations that impact our estimates. Individuals may receive vaccinations that are not recorded in the Illinois immunization registry, I-CARE, such as those administered in another state, causing underestimation of the number individuals who are up to date. Inconsistencies in records of separate doses administered to the same person, such as slight variations in dates of birth, can result in duplicate records for a person and underestimate the number of people who are up to date. For all datasets related to COVID-19, please
This dataset was collected as a complement to UN Global Pulse, UNHCR, Durham University, WHO and OCHA's study on simulation models to help with COVID-19 planning in world’s largest refugee settlement. The spread of infectious diseases such as COVID-19 presents many challenges to healthcare systems and infrastructures across the world, exacerbating inequalities and leaving the world’s most vulnerable populations most affected. Given their density and available infrastructure, refugee and internally displaced person (IDP) settlements can be particularly susceptible to disease spread. This survey collected data on individual's contact, interactions and time spent in public zones of refugees' camps in Cox's Bazar, in order to fill spreading matrices to inform this simulation of spread.
Cox's Bazar
Individuals
All participants of Community Based Protection Groups
Sample survey data [ssd]
The sample frame was obtained from lists of Community-Based Protection regular working groups. Each camp group was stratified by gender, age and disabilities, and members of each camp were randomly selected from the working groups of 20 camps in Cox's Bazar.
Telephone interview
Note: This dataset is historical only. -- COVID-19 vaccine delivered to providers in the City of Chicago. Daily counts are shown for the total number of doses delivered as well as cumulative totals as of that date. Data are updated Monday to Friday. As of the launch of this dataset, weekend deliveries are unusual but will be added to the appropriate date (i.e., Saturday or Sunday) the following Monday if they occur. All data are provisional and subject to change. Information is updated as additional details are received. At any given time, this dataset reflects data currently known to CDPH. Numbers in this dataset may differ from other public sources due to when data are reported and how City of Chicago boundaries are defined. For information about the number of vaccine doses administered by Chicago providers, see https://data.cityofchicago.org/Health-Human-Services/COVID-19-Daily-Vaccinations-Administered-in-Chicag/4564-ixr2. For information about the number of vaccine doses administered to Chicago residents and number of residents considered fully vaccinated regardless of if they were vaccinated in Chicago, see https://data.cityofchicago.org/Health-Human-Services/COVID-19-Daily-Vaccinations-Chicago-Residents/2vhs-cf6b. For all datasets related to COVID-19, see https://data.cityofchicago.org/browse?limitTo=datasets&sortBy=alpha&tags=covid-19. Data Sources: Vaccine Tracking System (VTrcks)
The COVID-19 Vaccination Survey in China was conducted in July 2021 to understand refugees' accessibility and willingness to receive a COVID-19 vaccination in China. UNHCR stresses that no one can be left behind in the global effort against COVID-19 and is monitoring the inclusion of refugees and asylum seekers in vaccination plans around the world. At the time, Chinese government policy did not provide free vaccines for foreigners without social security. The survey results however show that this policy was implemented with some flexibility, because among the few that were vaccinated already, more than half received a free COVID-19 vaccine. Some refugees reported difficulties or lack of information about vaccine registration or identity documents to book an appointment. Results further show that even though most are willing to get vaccinated, anti-vaccine sentiments are driven by fear of side effects.
The survey covers 24 provinces with most respondents residing in the province of Guangdong.
Households
The survey was distributed to all 1017 refugees and asylum seekers.
Census/enumeration data [cen]
No sampling was implmented.
Self-administered questionnaire: Web-based
Out of 1017 distributed surveys, UNHCR received 455 answers (45%). Of those, 30 respondents did not provide consent to participate in the survey.
The INFORM Epidemic Risk Index is highly relevant, easily adapted and was developed through an extensive process prior to COVID-19. Therefore it has been used as the starting point for a COVID-19 specific risk index, with the structure and relevant indicators retained as far as possible.
The INFORM Epidemic Risk Index consists of Hazard & Exposure, Vulnerability and Lack of Coping Capacity dimensions. The Person to Person component of Hazard & Exposure is the most relevant to COVID-19 and is used alone.
https://data.humdata.org/dataset/inform-covid-19-risk-index-version-0-1-2
Photo by Troy Bridges on Unsplash
Covid-19 Pandemic.
COVID-19 situation in Saudi Arabia collected from MOH daily reports https://twitter.com/SaudiMOH Explore the latest data on the COVID-19 situation and demographics in Saudi Arabia. This dataset provides valuable insights into the impact of the pandemic within the country. Follow data.kapsarc.org for timely data to advance energy economics research.
COVID-19 Saudi Arabia
The COVID-19 pandemic is first and foremost a health shock, but the secondary economic shock is equally formidable. Access to timely, policy-relevant information on the awareness of, responses to and impacts of the health situation and related restrictions are critical to effectively design, target and evaluate programme and policy interventions. This research project investigates the main socioeconomic impacts of the pandemic on UNHCR people of concern (PoC) – and nationals where possible – in terms of access to information, services and livelihoods opportunities. Two regions were targeted: the Greater Metropolitan Area and the Northern region. Two rounds of data collection took place for this survey, with the purpose of following up with the respondents.
Household
Sample survey data [ssd]
UNHCR’s ProGres database in Costa Rica contains 47,491 registered individuals of which 30,494 are active. Of the 30,494 active individuals registered in the database, 22,487 have a known location as well as a listed primary phone number. Phone penetration rates are high among the PoC population in Costa Rica with 9 out of 10 families having a phone number registered in the ProGres database. This list constitutes just over 22% of the total estimated PoC population living in Costa Rica. As such, this final list serves as the first-choice sampling frame for the phone survey. In addition, two regions of Costa Rica were identified for targeted sampling of PoC following discussion with the UNHCR country team and regional bureau and based on information captured in the ProGres database. These include the Greater Metropolitan Area (GAM, for its acronym in Spanish) inclusive of the capital San Jose and the Northern region. Moreover, it was identified that understanding differences across sub-groups based on country of origin was essential for operational needs. In the GAM the biggest groups are Nicaraguans (67%), Venezuelans (13%) and Cubans (11%). Alternatively, in the North Nicaraguans represent 90% of the PoC population. Based on the above, a sampling strategy was proposed based on four separate strata in order to adequately represent the regions and sub-groups of interest: 1.)GAM – Nicaragua stratum: Nicaraguan PoC in GAM; 2.) GAM – Venezuela stratum: Venezuelan PoC in GAM; 3.) GAM – Cuba stratum: Cuban PoC in GAM; and 4.) North – Nicaragua stratum: Nicaraguan PoC in the North.
Computer Assisted Telephone Interview [cati]
Questionnaire contained the following sections: consent, knowledge, behaviour, access, employment, income, food security, concerns, resilience, networks, demographics
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
A coronavirus dataset with 104 countries constructed from different reliable sources, where each row represents a country, and the columns represent geographic, climate, healthcare, economic, and demographic factors that may contribute to accelerate/slow the spread of the COVID-19. The assumptions for the different factors are as follows:
The last column represents the number of daily tests performed and the total number of cases and deaths reported each day.
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/SamBelkacem/COVID19-Algeria-and-World-Dataset/master/Images/Data%20description.png">
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/SamBelkacem/COVID19-Algeria-and-World-Dataset/master/Images/Countries%20by%20geographic%20coordinates.png">
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/SamBelkacem/COVID19-Algeria-and-World-Dataset/master/Images/Statistical%20description%20of%20the%20data.png">
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/SamBelkacem/COVID19-Algeria-and-World-Dataset/master/Images/Data%20distribution.png">
The dataset is available in an encoded CSV form on GitHub.
The Python Jupyter Notebook to read and visualize the data is available on nbviewer.
The dataset is updated every month with the latest numbers of COVID-19 cases, deaths, and tests. The last update was on March 01, 2021.
The dataset is constructed from different reliable sources, where each row represents a country, and the columns represent geographic, climate, healthcare, economic, and demographic factors that may contribute to accelerate/slow the spread of the coronavirus. Note that we selected only the main factors for which we found data and that other factors can be used. All data were retrieved from the reliable Our World in Data website, except for data on:
If you want to use the dataset please cite the following arXiv paper, more details about the data construction are provided in it.
@article{belkacem_covid-19_2020,
title = {COVID-19 data analysis and forecasting: Algeria and the world},
shorttitle = {COVID-19 data analysis and forecasting},
journal = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.09755},
author = {Belkacem, Sami},
year = {2020}
}
If you have any question or suggestion, please contact me at this email address: s.belkacem@usthb.dz
https://www.iza.org/wc/dataverse/IIL-1.0.pdfhttps://www.iza.org/wc/dataverse/IIL-1.0.pdf
On March 24, 2020, the Indian Government announced a nationwide lockdown to curb the spread of Covid-19, effective with a few hours of notice. For an estimated 40 million migrant workers in the country, this resulted in loss of income, food shortages, and uncertainty about the future. Over 10 million returned to rural homes in one of the largest internal migrations in the country's history. Once returned, they faced stays in government-run quarantine centers, stigma, and uncertain labor prospects. Over the next year, migrants navigated shifting mobility restrictions aimed at mitigating the spread of the pandemic, widespread outbreaks, and patchwork of social protection schemes in order to make ends meet. In order to understand the long-term labor and well-being effects of the pandemic on this population, the research team conducted a panel survey across four rounds with a random sample of 8,265 migrants that had returned to Bihar and Chhattisgarh shortly after the nationwide lockdown in March 2020. The team constructed a post-lockdown sample frame drawing from the approximate population of returned migrants, drawing from government records that attempted to catalogue all entrants in a given time period. These phone surveys included a repeated set of questions on employment and earnings, migration, access to social protections, and coping strategies, as well as single-wave modules on quarantine experiences, health behaviors and beliefs, household composition, migration networks, and discrimination. The questionnaires focused on different aspects of welfare as the pandemic in India has evolved. The following list below details important topics of the surveys: Pre-Lockdown Work Details (Employment, Earnings) Experiences Post-Migration (Harassment, Food Prices, Shortages, Bank Accounts) Awareness and Perceptions of COVID-19 Migration Networks Social Networks Political Participation Impact of COVID-19
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The free database mapping COVID-19 treatment and vaccine development based on the global scientific research is available at https://covid19-help.org/.
Files provided here are curated partial data exports in the form of .csv files or full data export as .sql script generated with pg_dump from our PostgreSQL 12 database. You can also find .png file with our ER diagram of tables in .sql file in this repository.
Structure of CSV files
*On our site, compounds are named as substances
compounds.csv
Id - Unique identifier in our database (unsigned integer)
Name - Name of the Substance/Compound (string)
Marketed name - The marketed name of the Substance/Compound (string)
Synonyms - Known synonyms (string)
Description - Description (HTML code)
Dietary sources - Dietary sources where the Substance/Compound can be found (string)
Dietary sources URL - Dietary sources URL (string)
Formula - Compound formula (HTML code)
Structure image URL - Url to our website with the structure image (string)
Status - Status of approval (string)
Therapeutic approach - Approach in which Substance/Compound works (string)
Drug status - Availability of Substance/Compound (string)
Additional data - Additional data in stringified JSON format with data as prescribing information and note (string)
General information - General information about Substance/Compound (HTML code)
references.csv
Id - Unique identifier in our database (unsigned integer)
Impact factor - Impact factor of the scientific article (string)
Source title - Title of the scientific article (string)
Source URL - URL link of the scientific article (string)
Tested on species - What testing model was used for the study (string)
Published at - Date of publication of the scientific article (Date in ISO 8601 format)
clinical-trials.csv
Id - Unique identifier in our database (unsigned integer)
Title - Title of the clinical trial study (string)
Acronym title - Acronym of title of the clinical trial study (string)
Source id - Unique identifier in the source database
Source id optional - Optional identifier in other databases (string)
Interventions - Description of interventions (string)
Study type - Type of the conducted study (string)
Study results - Has results? (string)
Phase - Current phase of the clinical trial (string)
Url - URL to clinical trial study page on clinicaltrials.gov (string)
Status - Status in which study currently is (string)
Start date - Date at which study was started (Date in ISO 8601 format)
Completion date - Date at which study was completed (Date in ISO 8601 format)
Additional data - Additional data in the form of stringified JSON with data as locations of study, study design, enrollment, age, outcome measures (string)
compound-reference-relations.csv
Reference id - Id of a reference in our DB (unsigned integer)
Compound id - Id of a substance in our DB (unsigned integer)
Note - Id of a substance in our DB (unsigned integer)
Is supporting - Is evidence supporting or contradictory (Boolean, true if supporting)
compound-clinical-trial.csv
Clinical trial id - Id of a clinical trial in our DB (unsigned integer)
Compound id - Id of a Substance/Compound in our DB (unsigned integer)
tags.csv
Id - Unique identifier in our database (unsigned integer)
Name - Name of the tag (string)
tags-entities.csv
Tag id - Id of a tag in our DB (unsigned integer)
Reference id - Id of a reference in our DB (unsigned integer)
API Specification
Our project also has an Open API that gives you access to our data in a format suitable for processing, particularly in JSON format.
https://covid19-help.org/api-specification
Services are split into five endpoints:
Substances - /api/substances
References - /api/references
Substance-reference relations - /api/substance-reference-relations
Clinical trials - /api/clinical-trials
Clinical trials-substances relations - /api/clinical-trials-substances
Method of providing data
All dates are text strings formatted in compliance with ISO 8601 as YYYY-MM-DD
If the syntax request is incorrect (missing or incorrectly formatted parameters) an HTTP 400 Bad Request response will be returned. The body of the response may include an explanation.
Data updated_at (used for querying changed-from) refers only to a particular entity and not its logical relations. Example: If a new substance reference relation is added, but the substance detail has not changed, this is reflected in the substance reference relation endpoint where a new entity with id and current dates in created_at and updated_at fields will be added, but in substances or references endpoint nothing has changed.
The recommended way of sequential download
During the first download, it is possible to obtain all data by entering an old enough date in the parameter value changed-from, for example: changed-from=2020-01-01 It is important to write down the date on which the receiving the data was initiated let’s say 2020-10-20
For repeated data downloads, it is sufficient to receive only the records in which something has changed. It can therefore be requested with the parameter changed-from=2020-10-20 (example from the previous bullet). Again, it is important to write down the date when the updates were downloaded (eg. 2020-10-20). This date will be used in the next update (refresh) of the data.
Services for entities
List of endpoint URLs:
Format of the request
All endpoints have these parameters in common:
changed-from - a parameter to return only the entities that have been modified on a given date or later.
continue-after-id - a parameter to return only the entities that have a larger ID than specified in the parameter.
limit - a parameter to return only the number of records specified (up to 1000). The preset number is 100.
Request example:
/api/references?changed-from=2020-01-01&continue-after-id=1&limit=100
Format of the response
The response format is the same for all endpoints.
number_of_remaining_ids - the number of remaining entities that meet the specified criteria but are not displayed on the page. An integer of virtually unlimited size.
entities - an array of entity details in JSON format.
Response example:
{
"number_of_remaining_ids" : 100,
"entities" : [
{
"id": 3,
"url": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32147628",
"title": "Discovering drugs to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).",
"impact_factor": "Discovering drugs to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).",
"tested_on_species": "in silico",
"publication_date": "2020-22-02",
"created_at": "2020-30-03",
"updated_at": "2020-31-03",
"deleted_at": null
},
{
"id": 4,
"url": "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32157862",
"title": "CT Manifestations of Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia: A Case Report",
"impact_factor": "CT Manifestations of Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia: A Case Report",
"tested_on_species": "Patient",
"publication_date": "2020-06-03",
"created_at": "2020-30-03",
"updated_at": "2020-30-03",
"deleted_at": null
},
]
}
Endpoint details
Substances
URL: /api/substances
Substances
UNHCR conducts Protection Monitoring with partners to analyze trends in the protection environment and situation of refugees in all regions of Lebanon on an ongoing basis. With the outbreak of COVID-19 in Lebanon and the introduction of movement and other restrictions aimed at preventing and containing the spread of the virus, UNHCR and its Protection Monitoring partners Caritas, Intersos and Sheild developed a specific questionnaire to elicit feedback from refugees on the impact of the COVID-19 response on their protection and well-being. The feedback from refugees is used to inform advocacy and programmatic interventions and modes of implementation with the aim of improving refugees' access to protection and essential services, assistance and information.
National coverage
Households
Sample survey data [ssd]
Each week, the caseload is sampled by Registration and sent to partners, who have a set target for calls to conduct each week.
HHs are sampled by Registration to satisfy the following criteria: 1. Age and gender related criteria: 1. a20% Cases with individuals between 16 and 25 -50% male/female 1.b 30% Cases with individuals between 26 and 59 -50% male/female 1.c 10% Cases with individuals who are 60 and above -50%male/female
[note that this method results in sampling from overlapping stratas] When sampling and assigning cases to partners, Registration is also taking into account: 3. the geographical distribution of refugees [although note - sampling is not yet exactly proportional to refugee distribution, but efforts are being made it to make it more so) 4. partners' capacity to complete the desired interview volume 5. the non-response rate that each partner is getting (e.g. this week Intersos BML was given more cases as they have a higher non-response rate than average)
Computer Assisted Telephone Interview [cati]
https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F5505749%2F2b83271d61e47e2523e10dc9c28e545c%2F600x200.jpg?generation=1599042483103679&alt=media" alt="">
Daily global COVID-19 data for all countries, provided by Johns Hopkins University (JHU) Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE). If you want to use the update version of the data, you can use our daily updated data with the help of api key by entering it via Altadata.
In this data product, you may find the latest and historical global daily data on the COVID-19 pandemic for all countries.
The COVID‑19 pandemic, also known as the coronavirus pandemic, is an ongoing global pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‑19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‑CoV‑2). The outbreak was first identified in December 2019 in Wuhan, China. The World Health Organization declared the outbreak a Public Health Emergency of International Concern on 30 January 2020 and a pandemic on 11 March. As of 12 August 2020, more than 20.2 million cases of COVID‑19 have been reported in more than 188 countries and territories, resulting in more than 741,000 deaths; more than 12.5 million people have recovered.
The Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center is a continuously updated source of COVID-19 data and expert guidance. They aggregate and analyze the best data available on COVID-19 - including cases, as well as testing, contact tracing and vaccine efforts - to help the public, policymakers and healthcare professionals worldwide respond to the pandemic.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
In many high-income economies, the recession caused by the Covid-19 pandemic has resulted in unprecedented declines in women’s employment. We examine how the forces that underlie this observation play out in developing countries, with a specific focus on Nigeria, the most populous country in Africa. A force affecting high- and low-income countries alike are increased childcare needs during school closures; in Nigeria, mothers of school-age children experience the largest declines in employment during the pandemic, just as in high-income countries. A key difference is the role of the sectoral distribution of employment: whereas in high-income economies reduced employment in contact-intensive services had a large impact on women, this sector plays a minor role in low-income countries. Another difference is that women’s employment rebounded much more quickly in low-income countries. We conjecture that large income losses without offsetting government transfers drive up labor supply in low-income countries during the recovery.
https://pamepi.rondonia.fiocruz.br/en/covid_en.html;,;https://opendatasus.saude.gov.br/dataset/srag-2021-e-2022;,;https://opendatasus.saude.gov.br/dataset/srag-2020https://pamepi.rondonia.fiocruz.br/en/covid_en.html;,;https://opendatasus.saude.gov.br/dataset/srag-2021-e-2022;,;https://opendatasus.saude.gov.br/dataset/srag-2020
The data includes demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic variables of hospitalised SRAS-CoV-2 infections in Brazil from February 2020 to November 2021 and was primarily prepared for use in the analysis performed in our titled manuscript "Profile of COVID-19 in Brazil: Risk factors and socioeconomic vulnerability associated with disease outcome", currently available as a preprint. The raw data can be freely downloaded directly at the OpenData SUS website (Link https://opendatasus.saude.gov.br/dataset/srag-2020 and https://opendatasus.saude.gov.br/dataset/srag-2021-e-2022) or through a Python code available at our GitHub directory https://github.com/PAMepi/PAMepi_scripts_datalake.git.
The data process to obtain the specific data described here is available at https://github.com/PAMepi/PAMEpi-Reproducibility-of-published-results.git.
This work can be cited as: 1. Platform For Analytical Models in Epidemiology. (2022). PAMEpi-Reproducibility-of-published-results (v1.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6385254. or 2. Pereira, Felipe AC, Arthur R. de Azevedo, Guilherme L. de Oliveira, Renzo Flores-Ortiz, Luis Iván O. Valencia, Moreno Rodrigues, Pablo IP Ramos, Nívea B. da Silva, and Juliane Fonseca Oliveira. "Profile of COVID-19 in Brazil: Risk Factors and Socioeconomic Vulnerability Associated with Disease Outcome." Available at SSRN 4081979.
An effective policy response to the economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic requires an enormous range of data to inform the design and response of programs. Public health measures require data on the spread of the disease, beliefs in the population, and capacity of the health system. Relief efforts depend on an understanding of hardships being faced by various segments of the population. Food policy requires measurement of agricultural production and hunger. In such a rapidly evolving pandemic, these data must be collected at a high frequency. Given the unexpected nature of the shock and urgency with which a response was required, Indian policymakers needed to formulate policies affecting India's 1.4 billion people, without the detailed evidence required to construct effective programs. To help overcome this evidence gap, the World Bank, IDinsight, and the Development Data Lab sought to produce rigorous and responsive data for policymakers across six states in India: Jharkhand, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, and Madhya Pradesh.
Jharkhand, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, and Madhya Pradesh
Household
Sample survey data [ssd]
The samples for these surveys were drawn from surveys and impact evaluations previously conducted by the World Bank, the Ministry of Rural Development, India and IDInsight. A detailed note on the sampling frames is available for download.
Details will be made available after all rounds of data collection and analysis is complete.
Computer Assisted Telephone Interview [cati]
The survey questionnaire consists of the following modules: - Module 0: Introduction - Module 1: Migration - Module 2: Labor and Income - Module 3: Consumption - Module 4: Agriculture - Module 5: Access to Relief - Module 6: Health
~55%