Serious violent crimes consist of Part 1 offenses as defined by the U.S. Department of Justice’s Uniform Reporting Statistics. These include murders, nonnegligent homicides, rapes (legacy and revised), robberies, and aggravated assaults. LAPD data were used for City of Los Angeles, LASD data were used for unincorporated areas and cities that contract with LASD for law enforcement services, and CA Attorney General data were used for all other cities with local police departments. This indicator is based on location of residence. Single-year data are only available for Los Angeles County overall, Service Planning Areas, Supervisorial Districts, City of Los Angeles overall, and City of Los Angeles Council Districts.Neighborhood violence and crime can have a harmful impact on all members of a community. Living in communities with high rates of violence and crime not only exposes residents to a greater personal risk of injury or death, but it can also render individuals more susceptible to many adverse health outcomes. People who are regularly exposed to violence and crime are more likely to suffer from chronic stress, depression, anxiety, and other mental health conditions. They are also less likely to be able to use their parks and neighborhoods for recreation and physical activity.For more information about the Community Health Profiles Data Initiative, please see the initiative homepage.

This map shows a comparable measure of crime in the United States. The crime index compares the average local crime level to that of the United States as a whole. An index of 100 is average. A crime index of 120 indicates that crime in that area is 20 percent above the national average.The crime data is provided by Applied Geographic Solutions, Inc. (AGS). AGS created models using the FBI Uniform Crime Report databases as the primary data source and using an initial range of about 65 socio-economic characteristics taken from the 2000 Census and AGS’ current year estimates. The crimes included in the models include murder, rape, robbery, assault, burglary, theft, and motor vehicle theft. The total crime index incorporates all crimes and provides a useful measure of the relative “overall” crime rate in an area. However, these are unweighted indexes, meaning that a murder is weighted no more heavily than a purse snatching in the computations. The geography depicts states, counties, Census tracts and Census block groups. An urban/rural "mask" layer helps you identify crime patterns in rural and urban settings. The Census tracts and block groups help identify neighborhood-level variation in the crime data.------------------------The Civic Analytics Network collaborates on shared projects that advance the use of data visualization and predictive analytics in solving important urban problems related to economic opportunity, poverty reduction, and addressing the root causes of social problems of equity and opportunity. For more information see About the Civil Analytics Network.

This dataset reflects incidents of crime in the City of Los Angeles from 2010 - 2019. This data is transcribed from original crime reports that are typed on paper and therefore there may be some inaccuracies within the data. Some location fields with missing data are noted as (0°, 0°). Address fields are only provided to the nearest hundred block in order to maintain privacy. This data is as accurate as the data in the database. Please note questions or concerns in the comments.

As of 2020, there were ****** violent crimes reported in Los Angeles by the Los Angeles Police Department. Within the provided time period, the highest number of robberies was reported in 2017, at ******.

There has been little research on United States homicide rates from a long-term perspective, primarily because there has been no consistent data series on a particular place preceding the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR), which began its first full year in 1931. To fill this research gap, this project created a data series that spans two centuries on homicides per capita for the city of Los Angeles. The goal was to create a site-specific, individual-based data series that could be used to examine major social shifts related to homicide, such as mass immigration, urban growth, war, demographic changes, and changes in laws. The basic approach to the data collection was to obtain the best possible estimate of annual counts and the most complete information on individual homicides. Data were derived from multiple sources, including Los Angeles court records, as well as annual reports of the coroner and daily newspapers. Part 1 (Annual Homicides and Related Data) variables include Los Angeles County annual counts of homicides, counts of female victims, method of killing such as drowning, suffocating, or strangling, and the homicide rate. Part 2 (Individual Homicide Data) variables include the date and place of the murder, the age, sex, race, and place of birth of the offender and victim, type of weapon used, and source of data.

The purpose of this data collection was to investigate the effects of crime rates, city characteristics, and police departments' financial resources on felony case attrition rates in 28 cities located in Los Angeles County, California. Demographic data for this collection were obtained from the 1983 COUNTY AND CITY DATA BOOK. Arrest data were collected directly from the 1980 and 1981 CALIFORNIA OFFENDER BASED TRANSACTION STATISTICS (OBTS) data files maintained by the California Bureau of Criminal Statistics. City demographic variables include total population, minority population, population aged 65 years or older, number of female-headed families, number of index crimes, number of families below the poverty level, city expenditures, and police expenditures. City arrest data include information on number of arrests disposed and number of males, females, blacks, and whites arrested. Also included are data on the number of cases released by police, denied by prosecutors, and acquitted, and data on the number of convicted cases given prison terms.

Percent of adults (18+ years old) who reported considering their neighborhood to be safe from crime Data Source: 2011 & 2015 Los Angeles County Health Survey; Office of Health Assessment and Epidemiology, Los Angeles County Department of Public Health. FAQS 1) What is the Los Angeles County Health Survey (LACHS)? The Los Angeles County Health Survey is a population based telephone survey that provides information concerning the health of Los Angeles County residents. The data are used for assessing health-related needs of the population, for program planning and policy development, and for program evaluation. The relatively large sample size allows users to obtain health indicator data for large demographic subgroups and across geographic regions of the County, including Service Planning Areas and Health Districts. Produced by Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, Office of Health Assessment and Epidemiology (OHAE) www.publichealth.lacounty.gov/ha 2) What are the sample sizes of the 2011 and 2015 LACHS? Estimates are based on self-reported data by random samples of 8,036 (from 2011 survey) and 8,008 (from 2015 survey) Los Angeles County adults, representative of the adult population in Los Angeles County. 3) What does the 95% CI mean? The 95% confidence intervals (CI) represent the variability in the estimate due to sampling; the actual prevalence in the population, 95 out of 100 times sampled, would fall within the range provided. 4) What is the prevalence and confidence intervals (CIs) for Los Angeles County and Los Angeles City? Findings for the County of Los Angeles: (84.1%; 95% CI=81.8-86.5)Findings for the City of Los Angeles: (79.9%; 95% CI=75.9-84.0) Note:For purposes of confidentiality, Community Plan Area results with cell sizes less than 5 are not reported and are excluded from the map display. "Field Name" = Field Definition “CPA_NUM” = Unique identifier for each Community Plan Area "NAME_ALF" = the 35 Community Plan Areas, LAX Plan Area, and the Port of Los Angeles Plan Area "Percent" = percentage of adults (18+ years old) whose reported considering their neighborhood to be safe from crime "Stable_est" = (Yes) the estimate is statistically stable (relative standard error ≤ 30%) (No) the estimate is statistically unstable (relative standard error >30%) and therefore may not be appropriate to use for planning or policy purposes "LowerCL" = the lower 95% confidence limit represents the lower margin of error that occurs with statistical sampling "UpperCL" = the upper 95% confidence limit represents the upper margin of error that occurs in statistical sampling

Reporting Districts form the basis of crime reporting, organizing crimes into specific areas.

Locations of offices providing crime prevention and support in Los Angeles CountyThis dataset is maintained through the County of Los Angeles Location Management System. The Location Management System is used by the County of Los Angeles GIS Program to maintain a single, comprehensive geographic database of locations countywide. For more information on the Location Management System, visit http://egis3.lacounty.gov/lms/.

The Justice Equity Need Index (JENI), by Advancement Project California, offers a means to map out the disparate burden that criminalization and a detention-first justice model place on specific communities. The index includes the following indicators:System Involvement: The system-involved population by ZIP Code results in direct needs for justice equity, as measured by adult and youth probation. Indicators: Adult Probation (per 1,000 people); Youth Probation (per 1,000 people) Inequity Drivers: Root inequities across communities that contribute to racial and economic disparities as seen in incarceration and policing. Indicators: Black, Latinx, AIAN, and NHPI Percentages of Population (average percentile); Unemployment Rate (%); Population aged 25+ without a High School Diploma (%); Population below 200% of the Federal Poverty Level (%); Violent Crime Rate (per 1,000 people) Criminalization Risk: Conditions where the criminal justice system has historically taken a detention-first, prevention-last approach. Indicators: Mental Health Hospitalizations (per 1,000 people); Substance Use-Related Hospitalizations (per 1,000 people); Homelessness Rate (per 1,000 people) Learn more at https://www.catalystcalifornia.org/campaign-tools/maps-and-data/justice-equity-need-index.Supervisorial Districts, SPAs, and CSAs determined by ZIP Code centroid.

Part 1 crimes, as defined by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), are:

Criminal Homicide Forcible Rape Robbery Aggravated Assault Burglary Larceny Theft Grand Theft Auto Arson

Part 2 crimes, as defined by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), are:

Forgery Fraud And NSF Checks Sex Offenses Felonies Sex Offenses Misdemeanors Non-Aggravated Assaults Weapon Laws Offenses Against Family Narcotics Liquor Laws Drunk / Alcohol / Drugs Disorderly Conduct Vagrancy Gambling Drunk Driving Vehicle / Boat Vehicle / Boating Laws Vandalism Warrants Receiving Stolen Property Federal Offenses without Money Federal Offenses with Money Felonies Miscellaneous Misdemeanors Miscellaneous

Note About Date Fields:By default, the cloud database assumes all date fields are provided in UTC time zone. As a result, the system attempts to convert to the local time zone in your browser resulting in dates that appear differently than the source file. For example, a user viewing the data in PST will see times that are 8 hours behind. For an example of how dates are displayed, see the example below: Source & Download File Online Database Table Display (Example for PST User)

3/18/2023 8:07:00 AM PST 3/18/2023 8:07:00 AM UTC 3/18/2023 12:07:00 AM DATA DICTIONARY:

Field Name
Field Description


LURN_SAK
System assigned number for the case


Incident Date
Date the crime incident occurred


Incident Reported Date
Date the crime was reported to LASD


Category
Incident crime category


Stat Code
A three digit numerical coding system to identify the primary crime category for an incident


Stat Code Desc
The definition of the statistical code number


Address
The street number, street name, state and zip where the incident occurred


Street
The street number and street name where the incident occurred


City
The city where the incident occurred


Zip
The zip code of the location where the incident occurred


Incident ID
The URN #, or Uniform Report Number, is a unique # assigned to every criminal and noncriminal incident


Reporting District
A geographical area defined by LASD which is within a city or unincorporated area where the incident occurred


Sequential (per Station)
Each incident for each station is issued a unique sequence # within a given year


Gang Related
Indicates if the crime incident was gang related


Unit ID
ORI # is a number issued by the FBI for every law enforcement agency


Unit Name
Station Name


Longitude
Longitude (as plotted on the nearest half block street segment)


Latitude
Latitude (as plotted on the nearest half block street segment)


Part Category
Part I Crime or Part II Crime indicator

***Starting on March 7th, 2024, the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) will adopt a new Records Management System for reporting crimes and arrests. This new system is being implemented to comply with the FBI's mandate to collect NIBRS-only data (NIBRS — FBI - https://www.fbi.gov/how-we-can-help-you/more-fbi-services-and-information/ucr/nibrs). During this transition, users will temporarily see only incidents reported in the retiring system. However, the LAPD is actively working on generating new NIBRS datasets to ensure a smoother and more efficient reporting system. ***

This dataset reflects arrest incidents in the City of Los Angeles from 2020 to present. This data is transcribed from original arrest reports that are typed on paper and therefore there may be some inaccuracies within the data. Some location fields with missing data are noted as (0.0000°, 0.0000°). Address fields are only provided to the nearest hundred block in order to maintain privacy. This data is as accurate as the data in the database. Please note questions or concerns in the comments.

The objective of this study was to examine the observable offending patterns of recent and past drug offenders to assess the crime control potential associated with recent increases in the incarceration of drug offenders. The periods examined were 1986 (representing the second half of the 1980s, when dramatic shifts toward increasing incarceration of drug offenders first became evident), and 1990 (after escalating sentences were well under way). Convicted offenders were the focus, since these cases are most directly affected by changes in imprisonment policies, particularly provisions for mandatory prison terms. Offending patterns of convicted and imprisoned drug offenders were contrasted to patterns of convicted robbers and burglars, both in and out of prison. The researchers used data from the National Judicial Reporting Program (NJRP), sponsored by the U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS), for information on the court processing of individual felony convictions. The National Association of Criminal Justice Planners (NACJP), which maintains data for the approximately 50 counties included in the NJRP, was contracted to determine the counties to be sampled (Los Angeles County and Maricopa County in Arizona were chosen) and to provide individual criminal histories. Variables include number of arrests for robbery, violent crimes, property crimes, and other felonies, number of drug arrests, number of misdemeanor arrests, rate of violent, property, robbery, weapons, other felony, drug, and misdemeanor arrests, offense type (drug trafficking, drug possession, robbery, and burglary), total number of incarcerations, total number of convictions, whether sentenced to prison, jail, or probation, incarceration sentence in months, sex, race, and age at sampled conviction, and age at first arrest (starting at age 17).

As of 2020, there were ***** rapes reported in Los Angeles. Within the provided time period, the highest number of rapes reported was in 2018, at *****.