2 datasets found
  1. The Roles of Dehumanization and Moral Outrage in Retributive Justice

    • plos.figshare.com
    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    docx
    Updated Jun 1, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Brock Bastian; Thomas F. Denson; Nick Haslam (2023). The Roles of Dehumanization and Moral Outrage in Retributive Justice [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061842
    Explore at:
    docxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Brock Bastian; Thomas F. Denson; Nick Haslam
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    When innocents are intentionally harmed, people are motivated to see that offenders get their “just deserts”. The severity of the punishment they seek is driven by the perceived magnitude of the harm and moral outrage. The present research extended this model of retributive justice by incorporating the role of offender dehumanization. In three experiments relying on survey methodology in Australia and the United States, participants read about different crimes that varied by type (child molestation, violent, or white collar – Studies 1 and 2) or severity (Study 3). The findings demonstrated that both moral outrage and dehumanization predicted punishment independently of the effects of crime type or crime severity. Both moral outrage and dehumanization mediated the relationship between perceived harm and severity of punishment. These findings highlight the role of offender dehumanization in punishment decisions and extend our understanding of processes implicated in retributive justice.

  2. Definitions of terms in this protocol.

    • plos.figshare.com
    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    xls
    Updated Oct 13, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Briohny Kennedy; Lyndal Bugeja; Jake Olivier; Sjaan Koppel; Jeremy Dwyer; Joseph Ibrahim (2023). Definitions of terms in this protocol. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292837.t002
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 13, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Briohny Kennedy; Lyndal Bugeja; Jake Olivier; Sjaan Koppel; Jeremy Dwyer; Joseph Ibrahim
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    BackgroundThere is a need for both descriptive and analytical evidence on the factors associated with older adult homicide. The current landscape is insufficient because most published research is confined to the United States, and contains insufficient data about the homicide context. This study protocol describes the proposed method for examining the characteristics and factors associated with older adult homicide in the Australian state of Victoria, using data generated for the criminal and coronial investigation into these deaths stored in the Victorian Homicide Register (VHR). Outcomes will support practitioners, policy makers and other key stakeholders to strengthen prevention strategies to reduce the risk of future homicides among older Victorians.MethodsThis study will comprise a single-jurisdiction population-based cross-sectional design to analyse consecutive cases of homicide among community-dwelling older adults in Victoria, Australia for the period 2001 to 2015. All homicides of adults aged 18 years and older, and where the Coroner’s investigation is completed at data extraction will be included. Variables will be selected in accordance with elements of the social-ecological model (i.e., individual, interpersonal, incident, and community). This will include: socio-demographic characteristics; presence of mental or physical illness; deceased-offender relationship; nature of any abuse between the deceased and offender; incident location and weapon used; the presence of alcohol or drugs; and criminal justice outcomes. Homicide rates per 100,000 population will be calculated for older adults (aged 65 years and older) and younger adults (aged 18–64 years), and compared as rate ratios using Poisson regression. Descriptive statistics and cross-tabulation will be generated for factors associated with homicide for older compared to younger adults. Homicide typologies based on deceased-offender relationship and motive will be explored within group and family homicides will be compared between older and younger adults.

  3. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Brock Bastian; Thomas F. Denson; Nick Haslam (2023). The Roles of Dehumanization and Moral Outrage in Retributive Justice [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061842
Organization logo

The Roles of Dehumanization and Moral Outrage in Retributive Justice

Explore at:
187 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
docxAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
Jun 1, 2023
Dataset provided by
PLOShttp://plos.org/
Authors
Brock Bastian; Thomas F. Denson; Nick Haslam
License

Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically

Description

When innocents are intentionally harmed, people are motivated to see that offenders get their “just deserts”. The severity of the punishment they seek is driven by the perceived magnitude of the harm and moral outrage. The present research extended this model of retributive justice by incorporating the role of offender dehumanization. In three experiments relying on survey methodology in Australia and the United States, participants read about different crimes that varied by type (child molestation, violent, or white collar – Studies 1 and 2) or severity (Study 3). The findings demonstrated that both moral outrage and dehumanization predicted punishment independently of the effects of crime type or crime severity. Both moral outrage and dehumanization mediated the relationship between perceived harm and severity of punishment. These findings highlight the role of offender dehumanization in punishment decisions and extend our understanding of processes implicated in retributive justice.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu