Monaco crime rate per 100K population for 2008 was 0.00, a 0% increase from 2007.

<ul style='margin-top:20px;'>

<li>Monaco crime rate per 100K population for 2007 was <strong>0.00</strong>, a <strong>100% decline</strong> from 2001.</li>
<li>Monaco crime rate per 100K population for 2001 was <strong>3.08</strong>, a <strong>0% increase</strong> from .</li>
<li>Monaco crime rate per 100K population for was <strong>0.00</strong>, a <strong>0% increase</strong> from .</li>
</ul>Intentional homicides are estimates of unlawful homicides purposely inflicted as a result of domestic disputes, interpersonal violence, violent conflicts over land resources, intergang violence over turf or control, and predatory violence and killing by armed groups. Intentional homicide does not include all intentional killing; the difference is usually in the organization of the killing. Individuals or small groups usually commit homicide, whereas killing in armed conflict is usually committed by fairly cohesive groups of up to several hundred members and is thus usually excluded.

Monaco MC: Intentional Homicides: Female: per 100,000 Female data was reported at 0.000 Ratio in 2015. This stayed constant from the previous number of 0.000 Ratio for 2013. Monaco MC: Intentional Homicides: Female: per 100,000 Female data is updated yearly, averaging 0.000 Ratio from Dec 2013 (Median) to 2015, with 2 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 0.000 Ratio in 2015 and a record low of 0.000 Ratio in 2015. Monaco MC: Intentional Homicides: Female: per 100,000 Female data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Monaco – Table MC.World Bank.WDI: Social: Health Statistics. Intentional homicides, female are estimates of unlawful female homicides purposely inflicted as a result of domestic disputes, interpersonal violence, violent conflicts over land resources, intergang violence over turf or control, and predatory violence and killing by armed groups. Intentional homicide does not include all intentional killing; the difference is usually in the organization of the killing. Individuals or small groups usually commit homicide, whereas killing in armed conflict is usually committed by fairly cohesive groups of up to several hundred members and is thus usually excluded.;UN Office on Drugs and Crime's International Homicide Statistics database.;;

Monaco: Thefts per 100,000 people: Pour cet indicateur, The UN office on drugs and crime fournit des données pour la Monaco de 2005 à 2016. La valeur moyenne pour Monaco pendant cette période était de 1015 thefts per 100,000 people avec un minimum de 958 thefts per 100,000 people en 2005 et un maximum de 1080 thefts per 100,000 people en 2016.

In 2024, Monaco and Andorra were the two safest country in the world according to the World Risk Index. San Marino followed behind. The Global Risk Index assesses the risk for disaster of 193 countries.

Most dangerous countries On the other end of the scale, the Philippines was ranked as the country with the highest risk rate with a score of 46.91. Indonesia and India followed behind. A high number of the countries with the highest risk rates were located in Asia. The World Risk Index - Assessing the risk of disaster In the framework of the World Risk Index, disaster risk is analyzed as a complex interplay of natural hazards and social, political and environmental factors. Unlike current approaches that focus strongly on the analysis of the various natural hazards, the World Risk Index, in addition to exposure analysis, focuses on the vulnerability of the population, i.e. its susceptibility, its capacities to cope with and to adapt to future natural events as well as the consequences of climate change. Disaster risk is seen as a function of exposure and vulnerability. The national states are the frame of reference for the analysis. The index consists of indicators in four components: exposure to natural hazards such as earthquakes, storms, floods, droughts and sea level rise; susceptibility as a function of public infrastructure, nutrition and the general economic framework; coping capacities as a function of governance, medical services and economic security; and adaptive capacities to future natural events and climate change.