8 datasets found
  1. d

    Data from: Evaluation of the Phoenix, Arizona, Homicide Clearance...

    • datasets.ai
    • icpsr.umich.edu
    • +1more
    0
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Department of Justice, Evaluation of the Phoenix, Arizona, Homicide Clearance Initiative, 2003-2005 [Dataset]. https://datasets.ai/datasets/evaluation-of-the-phoenix-arizona-homicide-clearance-initiative-2003-2005-428f2
    Explore at:
    0Available download formats
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Department of Justice
    Area covered
    Arizona, Phoenix
    Description

    The purpose of the study was to conduct a process and outcome evaluation of the Homicide Clearance Project in the Phoenix, Arizona Police Department. The primary objective of the Homicide Clearance Project was to improve homicide clearance rates by increasing investigative time through the transfer of four crime scene specialists to the homicide unit. In 2004, the Phoenix Police Department received a grant from the Bureau of Justice Assistance providing support for the assignment of four crime scene specialists directly to the department's Homicide Unit. Responsibilities of the crime scene specialists were to collect evidence at homicide scenes, prepare scene reports, develop scene diagrams, and other supportive activities. Prior to the project, homicide investigators were responsible for evidence collection, which reduced the time they could devote to investigations. The crime scene specialists were assigned to two of the four investigative squads within the homicide unit. This organizational arrangement provided for a performance evaluation of the squads with crime scene specialists (experimental squads) against the performance of the other squads (comparison squads). During the course of the evaluation, research staff coded information from all homicides that occurred during the 12-month period prior to the transfers (July 1, 2003 - June 30, 2004), referred to as the baseline period, the 2-month training period (July 1, 2004 - August 31, 2004), and a 10-month test period (September 1, 2004 - June 30, 2005). Data were collected on 404 homicide cases (Part 1), 532 homicide victims and survivors (Part 2), and 3,338 records of evidence collected at homicide scenes (Part 3). The two primary sources of information for the evaluation were investigative reports from the department's records management system, called the Police Automated Computer Entry (PACE) system, and crime laboratory reports from the crime laboratory's Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS). Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3 each contain variables that measure squad type, time period, and whether six general categories of evidence were collected. Part 1 contains a total of 18 variables including number of investigators, number of patrol officers at the scene, number of witnesses, number of crime scene specialists at the scene, number of investigators collecting evidence at the scene, total number of evidence collectors, whether the case was open or closed, type of arrest, and whether the case was open or closed by arrest. Part 2 contains a total of 37 variables including victim characteristics and motives. Other variables in Part 2 include an instrumental/expressive homicide indicator, whether the case was open or closed, type of arrest, whether the case was open or closed by arrest, number of investigators, number of patrol officers at the scene, number of witnesses, and investigative time to closure. Part 3 contains a total of 46 variables including primary/secondary scene indicator, scene type, number of pieces of evidence, total time at the scene, and number of photos taken. Part 3 also includes variables that measure whether 16 specific types of evidence were found and the number of items of evidence that were collected for 13 specific evidence types.

  2. d

    Data from: Drugs and Crime in Public Housing, 1986-1989: Los Angeles,...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • icpsr.umich.edu
    Updated Mar 12, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    National Institute of Justice (2025). Drugs and Crime in Public Housing, 1986-1989: Los Angeles, Phoenix, and Washington, DC [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/drugs-and-crime-in-public-housing-1986-1989-los-angeles-phoenix-and-washington-dc-72d17
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 12, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    National Institute of Justice
    Area covered
    Washington, Los Angeles, Phoenix
    Description

    This study investigates rates of serious crime for selected public housing developments in Washington, DC, Phoenix, Arizona, and Los Angeles, California, for the years 1986 to 1989. Offense rates in housing developments were compared to rates in nearby areas of private housing as well as to city-wide rates. In addition, the extent of law enforcement activity in housing developments as represented by arrests was considered and compared to arrest levels in other areas. This process allowed both intra-city and inter-city comparisons to be made. Variables cover study site, origin of data, year of event, offense codes, and location of event. Los Angeles files also include police division.

  3. Data from: Changing Patterns of Homicide and Social Policy in Philadelphia,...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • datasets.ai
    • +1more
    Updated Mar 12, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    National Institute of Justice (2025). Changing Patterns of Homicide and Social Policy in Philadelphia, Phoenix, and St. Louis, 1980-1994 [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/changing-patterns-of-homicide-and-social-policy-in-philadelphia-phoenix-and-st-louis-1980--60128
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 12, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    National Institute of Justicehttp://nij.ojp.gov/
    Area covered
    St. Louis
    Description

    This study sought to assess changes in the volume and types of homicide committed in Philadelphia, Phoenix, and St. Louis from 1980 to 1994 and to document the nature of those changes. Three of the eight cities originally studied by Margaret Zahn and Marc Riedel (NATURE AND PATTERNS OF HOMICIDE IN EIGHT AMERICAN CITIES, 1978 [ICPSR 8936]) were revisited for this data collection. In each city, police records were coded for each case of homicide occurring in the city each year from 1980 to 1994. Homicide data for St. Louis were provided by the St. Louis Homicide Project with Scott Decker and Richard Rosenfeld as the principal investigators. Variables describing the event cover study site, year of the case, date and time of assault, location of fatal injury, method used to kill the victim, and circumstances surrounding the death. Variables pertaining to offenders include total number of homicide and assault victims, number of offenders arrested, number of offenders identified, and disposition of event for offenders. Variables on victims focus on whether the victim was killed at work, if the victim was using drugs or alcohol, the victim's blood alcohol level, and the relationship of the victim to the offender. Demographic variables include age, sex, race, and marital status of victims and offenders.

  4. g

    Evaluation of a Repeat Offender Unit in Phoenix, Arizona, 1987-1989 |...

    • gimi9.com
    Updated Jul 5, 2002
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2002). Evaluation of a Repeat Offender Unit in Phoenix, Arizona, 1987-1989 | gimi9.com [Dataset]. https://gimi9.com/dataset/data-gov_evaluation-of-a-repeat-offender-unit-in-phoenix-arizona-1987-1989-f3b85/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 5, 2002
    License

    U.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Arizona, Phoenix
    Description

    The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a Repeat Offender Unit in Phoenix. Repeat Offender Programs are police-initiated procedures for patrolling and apprehending likely offenders in communities. These units typically rely on the cooperation of police and prosecutors who work together to identify, convict, and incarcerate individuals who are judged likely to commit crimes, especially serious crimes, at high rates. For this study, previous offenders were assigned either to a control or an experimental group. If an individual assigned to the experimental group was later arrested, the case received special attention by the Repeat Offender Program. Staff of the Repeat Offender Program worked closely with the county attorney's office to thoroughly document the case and to obtain victim and witness cooperation. If the individual was in the control group and was later arrested, no additional action was taken by the Program staff. Variables include assignment to the experimental or control group, jail status, probation and parole status, custody status, number of felony arrests, type of case, bond amount, number of counts against the individual, type of counts against the individual, number of prior convictions, arresting agency, case outcome, type of incarceration imposed, and length of incarceration imposed.

  5. a

    Public Safety- Homicide Clearance Rate AGOL

    • sjworkspace-essorg.hub.arcgis.com
    • egishub-phoenix.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Oct 2, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    City of Phoenix (2023). Public Safety- Homicide Clearance Rate AGOL [Dataset]. https://sjworkspace-essorg.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/Phoenix::public-safety-homicide-clearance-rate-agol
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 2, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    City of Phoenix
    Description

    A dashboard used by government agencies to monitor key performance indicators (KPIs) and communicate progress made on strategic outcomes with the general public and other interested stakeholders.

  6. a

    PPD - Homicide Clearance Rate* DEV

    • egishub-phoenix.hub.arcgis.com
    • sjworkspace-essorg.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Jun 12, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    City of Phoenix (2024). PPD - Homicide Clearance Rate* DEV [Dataset]. https://egishub-phoenix.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/ppd-homicide-clearance-rate-dev
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 12, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    City of Phoenix
    Description

    A dashboard used by government agencies to monitor key performance indicators (KPIs) and communicate progress made on strategic outcomes with the general public and other interested stakeholders.

  7. d

    Data from: Multiple Imputation for the Supplementary Homicide Reports:...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • datasets.ai
    • +2more
    Updated Mar 12, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    National Institute of Justice (2025). Multiple Imputation for the Supplementary Homicide Reports: Evaluation in Unique Test Data, 1990-1995, Chicago, Philadelphia, Phoenix and St. Louis [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/multiple-imputation-for-the-supplementary-homicide-reports-evaluation-in-unique-test-data-
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 12, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    National Institute of Justice
    Area covered
    Chicago, St. Louis
    Description

    This study was an evaluation of multiple imputation strategies to address missing data using the New Approach to Evaluating Supplementary Homicide Report (SHR) Data Imputation, 1990-1995 (ICPSR 20060) dataset.

  8. g

    Multiple Imputation for the Supplementary Homicide Reports: Evaluation in...

    • gimi9.com
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Multiple Imputation for the Supplementary Homicide Reports: Evaluation in Unique Test Data, 1990-1995, Chicago, Philadelphia, Phoenix and St. Louis | gimi9.com [Dataset]. https://gimi9.com/dataset/data-gov_multiple-imputation-for-the-supplementary-homicide-reports-evaluation-in-unique-test-data-
    Explore at:
    License

    U.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Chicago, St. Louis
    Description

    This study was an evaluation of multiple imputation strategies to address missing data using the New Approach to Evaluating Supplementary Homicide Report (SHR) Data Imputation, 1990-1995 (ICPSR 20060) dataset.

  9. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Department of Justice, Evaluation of the Phoenix, Arizona, Homicide Clearance Initiative, 2003-2005 [Dataset]. https://datasets.ai/datasets/evaluation-of-the-phoenix-arizona-homicide-clearance-initiative-2003-2005-428f2

Data from: Evaluation of the Phoenix, Arizona, Homicide Clearance Initiative, 2003-2005

Related Article
Explore at:
0Available download formats
Dataset authored and provided by
Department of Justice
Area covered
Arizona, Phoenix
Description

The purpose of the study was to conduct a process and outcome evaluation of the Homicide Clearance Project in the Phoenix, Arizona Police Department. The primary objective of the Homicide Clearance Project was to improve homicide clearance rates by increasing investigative time through the transfer of four crime scene specialists to the homicide unit. In 2004, the Phoenix Police Department received a grant from the Bureau of Justice Assistance providing support for the assignment of four crime scene specialists directly to the department's Homicide Unit. Responsibilities of the crime scene specialists were to collect evidence at homicide scenes, prepare scene reports, develop scene diagrams, and other supportive activities. Prior to the project, homicide investigators were responsible for evidence collection, which reduced the time they could devote to investigations. The crime scene specialists were assigned to two of the four investigative squads within the homicide unit. This organizational arrangement provided for a performance evaluation of the squads with crime scene specialists (experimental squads) against the performance of the other squads (comparison squads). During the course of the evaluation, research staff coded information from all homicides that occurred during the 12-month period prior to the transfers (July 1, 2003 - June 30, 2004), referred to as the baseline period, the 2-month training period (July 1, 2004 - August 31, 2004), and a 10-month test period (September 1, 2004 - June 30, 2005). Data were collected on 404 homicide cases (Part 1), 532 homicide victims and survivors (Part 2), and 3,338 records of evidence collected at homicide scenes (Part 3). The two primary sources of information for the evaluation were investigative reports from the department's records management system, called the Police Automated Computer Entry (PACE) system, and crime laboratory reports from the crime laboratory's Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS). Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3 each contain variables that measure squad type, time period, and whether six general categories of evidence were collected. Part 1 contains a total of 18 variables including number of investigators, number of patrol officers at the scene, number of witnesses, number of crime scene specialists at the scene, number of investigators collecting evidence at the scene, total number of evidence collectors, whether the case was open or closed, type of arrest, and whether the case was open or closed by arrest. Part 2 contains a total of 37 variables including victim characteristics and motives. Other variables in Part 2 include an instrumental/expressive homicide indicator, whether the case was open or closed, type of arrest, whether the case was open or closed by arrest, number of investigators, number of patrol officers at the scene, number of witnesses, and investigative time to closure. Part 3 contains a total of 46 variables including primary/secondary scene indicator, scene type, number of pieces of evidence, total time at the scene, and number of photos taken. Part 3 also includes variables that measure whether 16 specific types of evidence were found and the number of items of evidence that were collected for 13 specific evidence types.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu