This research involved the exploration of how the geographies of different crimes intersect with the geographies of social, economic, and demographic characteristics in Nashville, Tennessee, Portland, Oregon, and Tucson, Arizona. Violent crime data were collected from all three cities for the years 1998 through 2002. The data were geo-coded and then aggregated to block groups and census tracts. The data include variables on 28 different crimes, numerous demographic variables taken from the 2000 Census, and several land use variables.

Graph and download economic data for Combined Violent and Property Crime Offenses Known to Law Enforcement in Washington County, OR (DISCONTINUED) (FBITC041067) from 2005 to 2021 about Washington County, OR; crime; violent crime; property crime; Portland; OR; and USA.

In 2023, the property crime rate in the District of Columbia was 4,307.4 reported property crimes per 100,000 residents. New Mexico, Washington, Colorado and Louisiana rounded out the top five states with the highest rates of property crime in that year.

Combined Violent and Property Crime Offenses Known to Law Enforcement in Oregon County, MO was 63.00000 Known Incidents in January of 2021, according to the United States Federal Reserve. Historically, Combined Violent and Property Crime Offenses Known to Law Enforcement in Oregon County, MO reached a record high of 120.00000 in January of 2019 and a record low of 11.00000 in January of 2005. Trading Economics provides the current actual value, an historical data chart and related indicators for Combined Violent and Property Crime Offenses Known to Law Enforcement in Oregon County, MO - last updated from the United States Federal Reserve on July of 2025.

In 2023, the District of Columbia had the highest reported violent crime rate in the United States, with 1,150.9 violent crimes per 100,000 of the population. Maine had the lowest reported violent crime rate, with 102.5 offenses per 100,000 of the population. Life in the District The District of Columbia has seen a fluctuating population over the past few decades. Its population decreased throughout the 1990s, when its crime rate was at its peak, but has been steadily recovering since then. While unemployment in the District has also been falling, it still has had a high poverty rate in recent years. The gentrification of certain areas within Washington, D.C. over the past few years has made the contrast between rich and poor even greater and is also pushing crime out into the Maryland and Virginia suburbs around the District. Law enforcement in the U.S. Crime in the U.S. is trending downwards compared to years past, despite Americans feeling that crime is a problem in their country. In addition, the number of full-time law enforcement officers in the U.S. has increased recently, who, in keeping with the lower rate of crime, have also made fewer arrests than in years past.

Graph and download economic data for Combined Violent and Property Crime Offenses Known to Law Enforcement in Marion County, OR (DISCONTINUED) (FBITC041047) from 2005 to 2019 about Marion County, OR; Salem; crime; violent crime; property crime; OR; and USA.

Graph and download economic data for Combined Violent and Property Crime Offenses Known to Law Enforcement in Crook County, OR (DISCONTINUED) (FBITC041013) from 2005 to 2021 about Crook County, OR; crime; violent crime; property crime; OR; and USA.

This dataset is the City of Bend Police Department Case Offenses GIS layer curated for public use. Data is exported nightly from County E911 and ingested into City databases for both internal and external use.Please note data is updated nightly and reflects cases received as of 6 PM the previous day.Attribute Information: See Table Field Name Description

OBJECTID For internal use.

CaseNumber A unique identifier that corresponds to a call for service number. Case numbers with a “91” after the dash indicate they originated as an online report submitted via bendpolicereports.com (i.e. 2021-91001234). The first four numbers of a case number are the year the case was created.

ReportedDate This is the date and time the incident was reported to Deschutes County 911 or initiated by a Bend Police officer.

Day of Week Day of the week the case was reported.

CrimeCode Description of an offense as assigned by Oregon National Incident-Based Reporting System (O-NIBRS). One or more offense codes may be applied to each case report to identify which offenses occurred during the incident. In some instances, no codes are applied to a case report if the intent is to only document information; such instances will appear as “Case Report Only / No Crime Codes” in any tables.

CrimeCodeDesc Crime code description, based on the grouping of statutes as defined by Oregon Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) Division and National Incident-Base Reporting System (NIBRS). Full definitions available on the State of Oregon CJIS Uniform Crime Reporting Reference Materials website.

Statute Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) applied to the case report. ORS are the codified laws of the State of Oregon. Full statute definitions are available on the State of Oregon website.

StatuteDesc Description of the listed ORS. Full statute definitions are available on the State of Oregon website.

Counts The number of offenses reported in an incident.

AttemptCode Indicates whether the reported offense was attempted or committed.

CaseAddress The address where the incident occurred, rounded to the hundred block for privacy. Occasionally, reporting parties or involved subjects may not be able to provide the exact location where the reported incident occurred, a non-verifiable address is provided, or the crime may have occurred in a location outside Deschutes County. In these instances, the location field will say “address not verified or outside jurisdiction.”

Neighborhood City of Bend neighborhood in which an offense occurred. For questions regarding individual cases or incidents, you can request records from the Bend Police Department here: https://www.bendoregon.gov/government/departments/police/records-division or you can send an email to police@bendoregon.gov

Victim legal services generally, and victims rights enforcement legal services specifically, are still relatively new victim assistance fields compared with other forms of crime victim services. Therefore, the field of victim legal services has so far lacked a conceptual framework that articulates the ultimate goals of these services, and how the provision of these services is intended to promote those goals. This formative evaluation, which is a collaboration between the Justice Research and Statistics Association (JRSA) and the National Crime Victim Law Institute (NCVLI) and funded by the National Institute of Justice, seeks to address this gap by first creating a conceptual model and theory of change, and then testing it in practice.

In 2023, the rate of murder and nonnegligent manslaughter in the United States was at 5.7 cases per 100,000 of the population. This is a decrease from the previous year, when the murder and nonnegligent manslaughter rate stood at 6.5 per 100,000 of the population. However, due to the FBI's transition to a new crime reporting system, only not all law enforcement agencies submitted crime data to the FBI for 2023. As a result, figures may not accurately reflect the rate of murder and nonnegligent manslaughter in the U.S. in this year.

Graph and download economic data for Combined Violent and Property Crime Offenses Known to Law Enforcement in Wheeler County, OR (DISCONTINUED) (FBITC041069) from 2005 to 2016 about Wheeler County, OR; crime; violent crime; property crime; OR; and USA.

As part of its organization-wide transition to community policing in 1989, the Portland Police Bureau, in collaboration with the Family Violence Intervention Steering Committee of Multnomah County, developed a plan to reduce domestic violence in Portland. The creation of a special police unit to focus exclusively on misdemeanor domestic crimes was the centerpiece of the plan. This police unit, the Domestic Violence Reduction Unit (DVRU), had two goals: to increase the sanctions for batterers and to empower victims. This study was designed to determine whether DVRU strategies led to reductions in domestic violence. Data were collected from official records on batterers (Parts 1-10), and from surveys on victims (Parts 11-12). Part 1 (Police Recorded Study Case Data) provides information on police custody reports. Part 2 (Batterer Arrest History Data) describes the arrest history during a five-year period prior to each batterer's study case arrest date. Part 3 (Charges Data for Study Case Arrests) contains charges filed by the prosecutor's office in conjunction with study case arrests. Part 4 (Jail Data) reports booking charges and jail information. Part 5 (Court Data) contains sentencing information for those offenders who had either entered a guilty plea or had been found guilty of the charges stemming from the study case arrest. Data in Part 6 (Restraining Order Data) document the existence of restraining orders, before and/or after the study case arrest date. Part 7 (Diversion Program Data) includes deferred sentencing program information for study cases. Variables in Parts 1-7 provide information on number of batterer's arrests for domestic violence and non-domestic violence crimes in the past five years, charge and disposition of the study case, booking charges, number of hours offender spent in jail, type of release, type of sentence, if restraining order was filed after case arrest, if restraining order was served or vacated, number of days offender stayed in diversion program, and type of diversion violation incurred. Part 8 (Domestic Violence Reduction Unit Treatment Data) contains 395 of the 404 study cases that were randomly assigned to the treatment condition. Variables describe the types of services DVRU provided, such as taking photographs along with victim statements, providing the victim with information on case prosecution, restraining orders, shelters, counseling, and an appointment with district attorney, helping the victim get a restraining order, serving a restraining order on the batterer, transporting the victim to a shelter, and providing the victim with a motel voucher and emergency food supply. Part 9 (Police Record Recidivism Data) includes police entries (incident or arrest) six months before and six months after the study case arrest date. Part 10 (Police Recorded Revictimization and Reoffending Data) consists of revictimization and reoffending summary counts as well as time-to-failure data. Most of the variables in Part 10 were derived from information reported in Part 9. Part 9 and Part 10 variables include whether the offense in each incident was related to domestic violence, whether victimization was done by the same batterer as in the study case arrest, type of police action against the victimization, charges of the victimization, type of premises where the crime was committed, whether the police report indicated that witnesses or children were present, whether the police report mentioned victim injury, weapon used, involvement of drugs or alcohol, whether the batterer denied abuse victim, number of days from study cases to police-recorded revictimization, and whether the recorded victimization led to the batterer's arrest. Part 11 (Wave 1 Victim Interview Data) contains data obtained through in-person interviews with victims shortly (1-2 weeks) after the case entered the study. Data in Part 12 (Wave 2 Victim Interview Data) represent victims' responses to the second wave of interviews, conducted approximately six months after the study case victimization occurred. Variables in Part 11 and Part 12 cover the victim's experience six months before the study case arrest and six months after the study case arrest. Demographic variables in both files include victim's and batterer's race and ethnicity, employment, and income, and relationship status between victim and batterer. Information on childhood experiences includes whether the victim and batterer felt emotionally cared for by parents, whether the victim and batterer witnessed violence between parents while growing up, and whether the victim and batterer were abused as children by a family member. Variables on the batterer's abusive behaviors include whether the batterer threatened to kill, swore at, pushed or grabbed, slapped, beat, or forced the victim to have sex. Information on the results of the abuse includes whether the abuse led to cuts or bruises, broken bones, burns, internal injury, or damage to eyes or ears. Information was also collected on whether alcohol or drugs were involved in the abuse events. Variables on victims' actions after the event include whether the victim saw a doctor, whether the victim talked to a minister, a family member, a friend, a mental health professional, or a district attorney, whether the victim tried to get an arrest warrant, went to a shelter to talk, and/or stayed at a shelter, whether the victim asked police to intervene, tried to get a restraining order, talked to an attorney, or undertook other actions, and whether the event led to the batterer's arrest. Variables on victim satisfaction with the police and the DVRU include whether police or the DVRU were able to calm things down, recommended going to the district attorney, informed the victim of her legal rights, recommended that the victim contact shelter or support groups, transported the victim to a hospital, and listened to the victim, whether police treated the victim with respect, and whether the victim would want police or the DVRU involved in the future if needed. Variables on the victim's emotional state include whether the victim was confident that she could keep herself safe, felt her family life was under control, and felt she was doing all she could to get help. Other variables include number of children the victim had and their ages, and whether the children had seen violence between the victim and batterer.

Alaska saw the highest rape rate in the United States in 2023, with 118.4 rapes per 100,000 inhabitants. The lowest rate was found in New Jersey, with 17.9 rapes per 100,000 inhabitants. Sexual assault in Alaska Fighting sexual assault in Alaska is particularly difficult due to small, isolated, close-knit communities who can be wary of airing their dirty laundry to outsiders, as well as a low number of law enforcement employees in the state. In addition, Alaska’s low population is spread out over a large land area, meaning that in the event of an assault being reported to police, it can take law enforcement hours, or even days, to reach the most isolated communities. The victims of sexual assault There tends to be more reported female victims of sexual assault than male victims. However, since sexual assault is typically an underreported crime, especially among males, these figures could be, and probably are, much higher. In addition, many victims of sexual offenses tend to be young, although sexual assault can occur at any age.

Graph and download economic data for Combined Violent and Property Crime Offenses Known to Law Enforcement in Douglas County, OR (DISCONTINUED) (FBITC041019) from 2005 to 2021 about Douglas County, OR; crime; violent crime; property crime; OR; and USA.

The District of Columbia had the highest robbery rate in the United States in 2023, with 614.2 robberies per 100,000 inhabitants. The lowest robbery rate in the country was found in Idaho, with 9.5 robberies per 100,000 inhabitants. Crime in the District of Columbia The violent crime rate in the District of Columbia was found to be the highest in the United States, with there being a few reasons for this: Firstly, the population of the District of Columbia is quite low (causing a higher rate of crime), and secondly, issues such as the crack epidemic of the 1990s exacerbated the prevalence of crime in the District. As rising rents and gentrification force more people out of the District, crime is moving into neighboring Maryland and Virginia suburbs, as poorer residents seek more affordable living conditions. Crime in the United States Overall, violent crime in the United States and the District of Columbia today is far below the violent crime rate of the 1990s. While some may feel that crime is on the rise, due in part to media sensationalism in fact, the opposite is true, and the United States is becoming safer over time.

Graph and download economic data for Combined Violent and Property Crime Offenses Known to Law Enforcement in Jackson County, OR (DISCONTINUED) (FBITC041029) from 2005 to 2021 about Jackson County, OR; Medford; crime; violent crime; property crime; OR; and USA.

In 2023, the District of Columbia had the highest larceny-theft rate in the United States, with 2,990.8 cases of reported larceny-theft per 100,000 inhabitants. Colorado, New Mexico, Oregon, and Louisiana rounded out the top five states for larceny-theft in that year.

Graph and download economic data for Combined Violent and Property Crime Offenses Known to Law Enforcement in Benton County, OR (DISCONTINUED) (FBITC041003) from 2005 to 2021 about Benton County, OR; Corvallis; crime; violent crime; property crime; OR; and USA.

Past research indicates that there is wide variation in the measurement of juvenile recidivism across state juvenile justice systems. As such, concerns have been raised that cross-agency differences in the definition and measurement of juvenile recidivism may hamper the generalizability of knowledge as well as comparisons across jurisdictions. Yet it is unclear whether measurement choices do impact the conclusions of studies of juvenile recidivism. These data were collected to answer questions about the impact of measurement variation on the rates and predictors of juvenile recidivism. The first sample included 104,354 unique spells of Florida Department of Juvenile Justice supervision, including 48,616 diversion spells, 43,799 probation spells, and 11,939 residential commitment spells that ended between July 1, 2012 and June 30, 2016. The second sample used data from the Oregon Youth authority and featured 2,743 unique spells of supervision, including 1,616 probation spells and 1,127 parole spells that ended between July 1, 2012 and June 30, 2016. The data include a variety of operationalizations of juvenile recidivism that vary in terms of the type of system contact captured, the follow-up length used, and whether the measure includes adult criminal justice system information. The data also include information on youths' demographic characteristics, delinquency history, and risk and protective factors. Contextual data from the American Community Survey and Uniform Crime Reports are also included.

Graph and download economic data for Combined Violent and Property Crime Offenses Known to Law Enforcement in Columbia County, OR (DISCONTINUED) (FBITC041009) from 2005 to 2021 about Columbia County, OR; crime; violent crime; property crime; Portland; OR; and USA.