8 datasets found
  1. w

    Websites using Cross Domain Tracker For Affiliatewp

    • webtechsurvey.com
    csv
    Updated Apr 22, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    WebTechSurvey (2024). Websites using Cross Domain Tracker For Affiliatewp [Dataset]. https://webtechsurvey.com/technology/cross-domain-tracker-for-affiliatewp
    Explore at:
    csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 22, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    WebTechSurvey
    License

    https://webtechsurvey.com/termshttps://webtechsurvey.com/terms

    Time period covered
    2025
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    A complete list of live websites using the Cross Domain Tracker For Affiliatewp technology, compiled through global website indexing conducted by WebTechSurvey.

  2. c

    ckanext-ds-stats

    • catalog.civicdataecosystem.org
    Updated Jun 4, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2025). ckanext-ds-stats [Dataset]. https://catalog.civicdataecosystem.org/dataset/ckanext-ds-stats
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 4, 2025
    Description

    The ckanext-ds-stats extension for CKAN provides analytics and statistics capabilities by integrating with Google Analytics. It leverages dga-stats and ga-report to pull data from Google Analytics and display relevant statistics within the CKAN interface, primarily focusing on package resource downloads. Facilitating data-driven decisions about dataset usage and popularity, this extension helps CKAN administrators understand how users interact with their data catalog. It also supports cross-domain tracking using Google's site linking feature. Key Features: Google Analytics Integration: Utilizes the Google Analytics API to retrieve website usage data, providing insights into dataset and resource access patterns. Download Tracking: Tracks and displays the number of downloads for individual resources on package pages, providing immediate feedback on resource popularity. Bounce Rate Tracking: Records bounce rate information for a specified page (typically the home page), enabling assessment of landing page effectiveness. Cross-Domain Tracking: Supports cross-domain tracking to consolidate analytics data from multiple related domains into a single Google Analytics property. Event Tracking: (Potentially for CKAN 1.x) Enables tracking of events beyond resource downloads, providing a more holistic view of user interactions with the CKAN instance. Configurable Analytics Settings: Offers several configuration options, including resource_prefix to easily filter resource downloads in Google Analytics, and domain settings to specify the tracking domain.

  3. c

    Research data supporting "Large-Scale Multi-Domain Belief Tracking with...

    • repository.cam.ac.uk
    zip
    Updated Aug 9, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Budzianowski, PF; Ramadan, Osman; Gasic, Milica (2018). Research data supporting "Large-Scale Multi-Domain Belief Tracking with Knowledge Sharing" [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.26059
    Explore at:
    zip(12639800 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 9, 2018
    Dataset provided by
    Apollo
    University of Cambridge
    Authors
    Budzianowski, PF; Ramadan, Osman; Gasic, Milica
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    The Multi-Domain Wizard-of-Oz dataset (MultiWOZ), a collection of human-human written conversations spanning over multiple domains and topics. The dataset was collected based on the Wizard of Oz experiment on Amazon MTurk. Each dialogue contains a goal label and several exchanges between a visitor and the system. Each system turn has labels from the set of slot-value pairs representing a coarse representation of dialogue state. There are in total 9855 dialogues.

  4. Self-contained ground-truths for cross-domain linkage

    • figshare.com
    zip
    Updated Apr 28, 2016
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Mayank Kejriwal (2016). Self-contained ground-truths for cross-domain linkage [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3204325.v1
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 28, 2016
    Dataset provided by
    figshare
    Figsharehttp://figshare.com/
    Authors
    Mayank Kejriwal
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Cross-domain knowledge bases such as DBpedia, Freebase and YAGO have emerged as encyclopedic hubs in the Web of Linked Data. Despite enabling several practical applications in the Semantic Web, the large-scale, schema-free nature of such graphs often precludes research groups from employing them widely as evaluation test cases for entity resolution and instance-based ontology alignment applications. Although the ground-truth linkages between the three knowledge bases above are available, they are not amenable to resource-limited applications. One reason is that the ground-truth files are not self-contained, meaning that a researcher must usually perform a series of expensive joins (typically in MapReduce) to obtain usable information sets. We constructed this resource by uploading several publicly licensed data resources to the public cloud and used simple Hadoop clusters to compile, and make accessible, three cross-domain self-contained test cases involving linked instances from DBpedia, Freebase and YAGO. Self-containment is enabled by virtue of a simple NoSQL JSON-like serialization format. Potential applications for these resources, particularly related to testing transfer learning research hypotheses, are described in more detail in a paper submission in the resource track at ISWC 2016.

  5. d

    Integrating animal tracking datasets at a continental scale for mapping...

    • dataone.org
    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    • +2more
    Updated Nov 3, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Julian Oeser (2023). Integrating animal tracking datasets at a continental scale for mapping Eurasian lynx habitat [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.z8w9ghxhn
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 3, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Dryad Digital Repository
    Authors
    Julian Oeser
    Time period covered
    Oct 17, 2023
    Description

    Aim:  The increasing availability of animal tracking datasets collected across many sites provides new opportunities to move beyond local assessments to enable detailed and consistent habitat mapping at biogeographic scales. However, integrating wildlife datasets across large areas and study sites is challenging, as species’ varying responses to different environmental contexts must be reconciled. Here, we compare approaches for large-area habitat mapping and assess available habitat for a recolonizing large carnivore, the Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx). Â

    Location: Europe  Methods:  We use a continental-scale animal tracking database (450 individuals from 14 study sites) to systematically assess modeling approaches, comparing (1) global strategies that pool all data for training vs. building local, site-specific models and combining them, (2) different approaches for incorporating regional variation in habitat selection, and (3) different modeling algorithms, testing nonlinear mixed eff...

  6. n

    14C of soil CO2 from IPY ITEX Cross Site Comparison

    • access.earthdata.nasa.gov
    • gcmd.earthdata.nasa.gov
    html
    Updated Apr 21, 2017
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2017). 14C of soil CO2 from IPY ITEX Cross Site Comparison [Dataset]. https://access.earthdata.nasa.gov/collections/C1214602443-SCIOPS
    Explore at:
    htmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 21, 2017
    Time period covered
    Jan 16, 2008 - Jan 21, 2008
    Area covered
    Description

    Study sites: Toolik Lake Field Station Alaska, USA 68.63 N, 149.57 W; Atqasuk, Alaska USA 70.45 N, 157.40 W; Barrow, Alaska, USA 71.30 N, 156.67 W; Latnjajaure, Sweden 68.35 N, 18.50 E; Falls Creek, Australia: Site 2-unburned 36.90 S 147.29 E; Site 3-burned 36.89 S 147.28 E. Additional sites will be added summer 2008, but the exact sites are not finalized. Purpose: Collect soil CO2 for analysis of radiocarbon to evaluate the age of the carbon respired in controls and warmed plots from across the ITEX network. Treatments: control and ITEX OTC warming experiment (1994-2007). Design: 5 replicates of each treatment at dry site and moist site. Sampling frequency: Once per peak season.

  7. Integrating animal tracking datasets at a continental scale for mapping...

    • zenodo.org
    bin, csv, tiff
    Updated Jul 11, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Julian Oeser; Julian Oeser (2024). Integrating animal tracking datasets at a continental scale for mapping wildlife habitat [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.z8w9ghxhn
    Explore at:
    bin, tiff, csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jul 11, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Zenodohttp://zenodo.org/
    Authors
    Julian Oeser; Julian Oeser
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description
    Aim:
    The increasing availability of animal tracking datasets collected across many sites provides new opportunities to move beyond local assessments to enable detailed and consistent habitat mapping at biogeographic scales. However, integrating wildlife datasets across large areas and study sites is challenging, as species' varying responses to different environmental contexts must be reconciled. Here, we compare approaches for large-area habitat mapping and assess available habitat for a recolonizing large carnivore, the Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx).
    Location: Europe
    Methods:
    We use a continental-scale animal tracking database (450 individuals from 14 study sites) to systematically assess modeling approaches, comparing (1) global strategies that pool all data for training vs. building local, site-specific models and combining them, (2) different approaches for incorporating regional variation in habitat selection, and (3) different modeling algorithms, testing nonlinear mixed effects models as well as machine-learning algorithms.
    Results:
    Both global and local modeling strategies allowed building transferable habitat models with overall similar predictive performance. Model performance was the highest using flexible machine-learning algorithms and when incorporating variation in habitat selection as a function of environmental variation. Our best-performing model used a weighted combination of local, site-specific habitat models. Our habitat maps identified large areas of suitable, but currently unoccupied lynx habitat, with many of the most suitable unoccupied areas located in regions that could foster connectivity between currently isolated populations.
    Main conclusions:
    We demonstrate that global and local modeling strategies can achieve robust habitat models at the continental scale and that considering regional variation in habitat selection improves broad-scale habitat mapping. More generally, we highlight the promise of large wildlife tracking databases for large-area habitat mapping. Our maps provide the first high-resolution, yet continental assessment of lynx habitat across Europe, providing a consistent basis for conservation planning for restoring the species within its former range.
  8. Replication Data for "Prevalence of Third-Party Tracking on Abortion Clinic...

    • figshare.com
    txt
    Updated May 30, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Ari B Friedman (2023). Replication Data for "Prevalence of Third-Party Tracking on Abortion Clinic Web Pages" [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21437970.v1
    Explore at:
    txtAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 30, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Figsharehttp://figshare.com/
    Authors
    Ari B Friedman
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    In this cross-sectional study, we extracted the uniform resource locator (URL) of each National Abortion Federation member facility on May 6, 2022. We visited each unique URL using webXray (Timothy Libert), which detects third-party tracking. For each web page, we recorded data transfers to third-party domains. Transfers typically include a user’s IP (internet protocol) address and the web page being visited. We also recorded the presence of third-party cookies, data stored on a user’s computer that can facilitate tracking across multiple websites.

  9. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
WebTechSurvey (2024). Websites using Cross Domain Tracker For Affiliatewp [Dataset]. https://webtechsurvey.com/technology/cross-domain-tracker-for-affiliatewp

Websites using Cross Domain Tracker For Affiliatewp

Explore at:
csvAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
Apr 22, 2024
Dataset authored and provided by
WebTechSurvey
License

https://webtechsurvey.com/termshttps://webtechsurvey.com/terms

Time period covered
2025
Area covered
Global
Description

A complete list of live websites using the Cross Domain Tracker For Affiliatewp technology, compiled through global website indexing conducted by WebTechSurvey.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu